RV-List Digest Archive

Tue 05/30/06


Total Messages Posted: 57



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 07:23 AM - Re: Fuel Line Firewall Penetration Location (Jekyll)
     2. 07:33 AM - Hangar For Sale at KCNO (Chino, CA) (Dan Checkoway)
     3. 07:42 AM - Re: stiff brakes (Darrell Reiley)
     4. 07:47 AM - How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight (DAVID REEL)
     5. 07:55 AM - Re: Re: Fuel Line Firewall Penetration Location (Dwight Frye)
     6. 08:14 AM - Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight (Ralph E. Capen)
     7. 08:19 AM - Re: Fuel Line Firewall Penetration Location (Jekyll)
     8. 08:25 AM - Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight (Alex Peterson)
     9. 08:31 AM - Re: Hangar For Sale at KCNO (Chino, CA) (Dan Checkoway)
    10. 08:39 AM - Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight (Sherman Butler)
    11. 09:01 AM - GPS Tracking... (Bill VonDane)
    12. 09:10 AM - Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight (Lloyd, Daniel R.)
    13. 09:10 AM - Sterio Icom (Charles Heathco)
    14. 09:14 AM - Re: GPS Tracking... (Ralph E. Capen)
    15. 09:22 AM - Re: Re: Fuel Line Firewall Penetration Location (Terry Watson)
    16. 09:32 AM - Re: GPS Tracking... (Konrad L. Werner)
    17. 09:32 AM - Re: GPS Tracking... (Dan Beadle)
    18. 09:32 AM - Re: GPS Tracking... (vinnfizz@aol.com)
    19. 09:39 AM - Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight (Dan Beadle)
    20. 09:47 AM - Hanging my IO-320 - lower mount spacer (Gerry Filby)
    21. 09:47 AM - Re: GPS Tracking... (James Clark)
    22. 09:59 AM - Re: GPS Tracking... (Larry Pardue)
    23. 10:00 AM - Re: GPS Tracking... (Terry Watson)
    24. 10:14 AM - Re: GPS Tracking... (Rob Prior (rv7))
    25. 10:15 AM - Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight (Tim Olson)
    26. 10:20 AM - Re: GPS Tracking... (Chris W)
    27. 10:53 AM - Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight (John Jessen)
    28. 11:09 AM - Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight (Ed Anderson)
    29. 11:14 AM - Re: Sterio Icom (Paul Besing)
    30. 11:18 AM - Re: GPS Tracking... (David E. Nelson)
    31. 12:01 PM - Re: GPS Tracking... (Bill VonDane)
    32. 12:20 PM - mixture cable flexing (Erich_Weaver@URSCorp.com)
    33. 12:50 PM - Re: Re: GPS Tracking... (Larry Pardue)
    34. 01:18 PM - Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight (Smitty)
    35. 01:33 PM - Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight (Dale Ensing)
    36. 01:41 PM - Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight (Rick McCraw)
    37. 02:00 PM - Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight (Joseph Larson)
    38. 02:39 PM - Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight (bdjones1965)
    39. 03:11 PM - Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight (Jerry Grimmonpre)
    40. 03:27 PM - Re: Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight (Joseph Larson)
    41. 04:03 PM - Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight (Tom Gummo)
    42. 04:14 PM - Re: stiff brakes (Charles Reiche)
    43. 04:26 PM - Re: mixture cable flexing (sarg314)
    44. 04:30 PM - Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight (Ron Lee)
    45. 04:52 PM - Re: Re: GPS Tracking... (David E. Nelson)
    46. 05:04 PM - Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight (Kevin Horton)
    47. 05:17 PM - Re: stiff brakes (Darrell Reiley)
    48. 05:38 PM - Re: stiff brakes (D.Bristol)
    49. 05:46 PM - the ole -4 vs -8 vs HRII thread (JOHN STARN)
    50. 07:12 PM - Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight (Mike Kraus)
    51. 07:12 PM - Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight (Tom Gummo)
    52. 07:21 PM - Re: Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight (dick martin)
    53. 07:46 PM - Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight (Paul Besing)
    54. 07:54 PM - Burnt out MAC indicator? (Larry Bowen)
    55. 08:12 PM - Re: stiff brakes (Darrell Reiley)
    56. 09:09 PM - Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight (John Brick)
    57. 09:35 PM - Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight (LessDragProd@aol.com)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:23:32 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Fuel Line Firewall Penetration Location
    From: "Jekyll" <rcitjh@aol.com>
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Jekyll" <rcitjh@aol.com> Dwight: IO-360 firewall penetration location IS DIFFERENT from the O-360 location. Drawing OP-32 shows the correct location and the parts list. The drawing comes with the FWF. Jekyll Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=37372#37372


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:33:48 AM PST US
    From: "Dan Checkoway" <dan@rvproject.com>
    Subject: Hangar For Sale at KCNO (Chino, CA)
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Dan Checkoway" <dan@rvproject.com> My hangarmate (RV-7A builder) Linas is selling one of his hangars at Chino, CA (KCNO). Here's the deal... Port-A-Port Executive II hangar large enough for a twin engine aircraft. Price $15,000. Contact number 949-436-1792.


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:42:20 AM PST US
    From: Darrell Reiley <lifeofreiley2003@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: stiff brakes
    --> RV-List message posted by: Darrell Reiley <lifeofreiley2003@yahoo.com> Did you read this Charles? According to Wheeler North we must be smoking crack. We never even fixed the brakes on the airplanes we worked on, as bleeding the brakes or even straightening up a caliper and brake line that was forcing a sideways bind could never have caused the brakes to have an issue! I guess is was a miracle... Darrell "do not archive" Wheeler North <wnorth@sdccd.edu> wrote: --> RV-List message posted by: Wheeler North Most likely is the pedal rocker pivots are too stiff and the small compensating valve spring in the master cyl can't open, thereby pushing the pedal back that last bit. (These are NOT the pedal swing pivots which allow for rudder movement) After a bit they either bleed down, or the system cools and reduces fluid pressure. Check by getting the brakes to the stiff condition then pull back on the tops of the pedals to force them fully back and see if that loosens the brakes. (This also assumes the pedal rocker action has enough swing clearence to let the master cyls fully extend.) If this is the case the best fix is to loosen those pivots some as another spring is something that could break/jam/whatever at the wrong time. Air in the line would not cause this as the compensating port allows for air or fluid to return immediately. Is also not likely to be gunk in the caliper as that would probably not get better after a few minutes. The same would also be true for the too tight pins that retain the floating calipers. The one other option is the matco style parking brake valve could be not fully opening both poppets thereby acting like one way check valves, if one is installed. If the above test doesn't make it better remove the pants and get them stiff, then open the bleeder for a tad and see if they loosen. This will tell you if the P brake is holding the pressure on. (you could also try working the P-brake valve when they are stiff and see if that suddenly loosens them.) W --------------------------------- Be a chatter box. Enjoy free PC-to-PC calls with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:47:08 AM PST US
    From: "DAVID REEL" <dreel@cox.net>
    Subject: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight
    --> RV-List message posted by: "DAVID REEL" <dreel@cox.net> I've been exploring the CG range in flight testing of my RV8A and have found an unanticipated cruise speed effect. At 85.9 inches, I was getting 155kias with 2300rpm, 23 in mp, 5,500 ft, and 42 degrees F outside. At 79.6 inches, I got 142kias with 2300rpm, 23 in mp, 4,500 ft, and 64 degrees F outside. My whiz wheel gives true airspeeds of roughly 169kt and 154kt. Quite an improvement just by adding some weight in back. Yes, the fast flight was with a little bit higher weight! There's lots of discussion of speed improvements in the archives, but nothing related to CG location that I could find and certainly nothing so easy to get and of this magnitude. So, my question to everyone is have you had similar experience? Do you know anywhere this has been quantified or further detailed? After all, I'm just comparing two test flights here, but theoretically, I'd guess the decrease in drag due to decreased pitch stability requirements as the CG moves aft would explain the speed increase. Excited! Dave Reel - RV8A


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:55:35 AM PST US
    From: Dwight Frye <dwight@openweave.org>
    Subject: Re: Fuel Line Firewall Penetration Location
    --> RV-List message posted by: Dwight Frye <dwight@openweave.org> Jekyll, I thought there may well be a difference ... and it is a pity that builders don't get warned of this until they get the FWF kit. :) Thanks for the heads up! Is the difference due to a different location of the engine driven fuel pump? Or is there some other reason? Can you tell me -where- the suggested location might be? (I've had input from some other folks already, but want to collect as much information as I can.) Maybe the smart move here would be for me to order the OP-32 plan sheet from Van's ... even though my need to otherwise order the FWF kit is months away. (Or maybe I should just order the darn kit, and be done with it. Choices, choices.) -- Dwight do not archive On Tue May 30 10:15:22 2006, Jekyll wrote : > >--> RV-List message posted by: "Jekyll" <rcitjh@aol.com> > >Dwight: > >IO-360 firewall penetration location IS DIFFERENT from the O-360 location. Drawing OP-32 shows the correct location and the parts list. The drawing comes with the FWF. > >Jekyll > > >Read this topic online here: > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=37372#37372 > > > > > > >


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:14:49 AM PST US
    From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen@earthlink.net> Have you tried simply altering the CG and not the weight? I think I remember reading somewhere that the shifted CG changes stabilized AOA thereby changing drag characteristics. Geek - not aerodynamicist...and I stayed at a Marriot this weekend instead of a Holiday Inn! -----Original Message----- >From: DAVID REEL <dreel@cox.net> >Sent: May 30, 2006 10:47 AM >To: rvlist <rv-list@matronics.com> >Subject: RV-List: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight > >--> RV-List message posted by: "DAVID REEL" <dreel@cox.net> > >I've been exploring the CG range in flight testing of my RV8A and have found >an unanticipated cruise speed effect. At 85.9 inches, I was getting 155kias >with 2300rpm, 23 in mp, 5,500 ft, and 42 degrees F outside. At 79.6 inches, >I got 142kias with 2300rpm, 23 in mp, 4,500 ft, and 64 degrees F outside. >My whiz wheel gives true airspeeds of roughly 169kt and 154kt. Quite an >improvement just by adding some weight in back. Yes, the fast flight was >with a little bit higher weight! > >There's lots of discussion of speed improvements in the archives, but >nothing related to CG location that I could find and certainly nothing so >easy to get and of this magnitude. So, my question to everyone is have you >had similar experience? Do you know anywhere this has been quantified or >further detailed? After all, I'm just comparing two test flights here, but >theoretically, I'd guess the decrease in drag due to decreased pitch >stability requirements as the CG moves aft would explain the speed increase. > >Excited! > >Dave Reel - RV8A > > > > > > >


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:19:21 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Fuel Line Firewall Penetration Location
    From: "Jekyll" <rcitjh@aol.com>
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Jekyll" <rcitjh@aol.com> Dwight: If you are to the point of doing your fuel line passthrough, you are to the point of needing your FWF. It comes with the parts you install on the FW behind the engine such as the heater valve, the master and battery relays and the battery/battery box to name a few. The engine driven fuel pump is in the same location but you need a different fuel line to accommodate the location. You said you are using a vertical induction IO so, you will be getting O-360 finishing and FWF kits. Email or call Vans for the full list of the FWF parts to allow you to add and delete parts as necessary to adapt the O-360 for a vertical induction IO-360. You need to delete the gascolator, gascolator bracket. Substitute certain fule lines and throttle cable and throttle bracket. Jekyll Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=37390#37390


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:25:57 AM PST US
    From: "Alex Peterson" <alexpeterson@earthlink.net>
    Subject: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Alex Peterson" <alexpeterson@earthlink.net> > --> RV-List message posted by: "DAVID REEL" <dreel@cox.net> > > I've been exploring the CG range in flight testing of my RV8A > and have found an unanticipated cruise speed effect. At 85.9 > inches, I was getting 155kias with 2300rpm, 23 in mp, 5,500 > ft, and 42 degrees F outside. At 79.6 inches, I got 142kias > with 2300rpm, 23 in mp, 4,500 ft, and 64 degrees F outside. > My whiz wheel gives true airspeeds of roughly 169kt and > 154kt. Quite an improvement just by adding some weight in > back. Yes, the fast flight was with a little bit higher weight! > > There's lots of discussion of speed improvements in the > archives, but nothing related to CG location that I could > find and certainly nothing so easy to get and of this > magnitude. So, my question to everyone is have you had > similar experience? Do you know anywhere this has been > quantified or further detailed? After all, I'm just > comparing two test flights here, but theoretically, I'd guess > the decrease in drag due to decreased pitch stability > requirements as the CG moves aft would explain the speed increase. > > Excited! > > Dave Reel - RV8A Dave, What were the fuel burns during those two runs? One cannot state that the power was the same, only that the MAP and RPM were the same. You can vary airspeed greatly with mixture. A more aft cg is more efficient, but not that much. (The tail doesn't have to generate as much downward lift.) Alex Peterson RV6-A N66AP 755 hours Maple Grove, MN


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:31:49 AM PST US
    From: "Dan Checkoway" <dan@rvproject.com>
    Subject: Re: Hangar For Sale at KCNO (Chino, CA)
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Dan Checkoway" <dan@rvproject.com> Sorry for the confusion, but the hangar has been taken off the market.


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:39:07 AM PST US
    From: Sherman Butler <lsbrv7a@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight
    --> RV-List message posted by: Sherman Butler <lsbrv7a@yahoo.com> David, That is true in my Bonanza as well, although I have never tried to quantify it. Less drag from less elevator (ruddivator) down force. The Bonanza experts warn of CG change with fuel burn moving the CG aft and the possibility of elevator sensitivity during the landing flare resulting in over correction. Did you notice increased elevator sensitivity? DAVID REEL <dreel@cox.net> wrote: --> RV-List message posted by: "DAVID REEL" I've been exploring the CG range in flight testing of my RV8A and have found an unanticipated cruise speed effect. At 85.9 inches, I was getting 155kias with 2300rpm, 23 in mp, 5,500 ft, and 42 degrees F outside. At 79.6 inches, I got 142kias with 2300rpm, 23 in mp, 4,500 ft, and 64 degrees F outside. My whiz wheel gives true airspeeds of roughly 169kt and 154kt. Quite an improvement just by adding some weight in back. Yes, the fast flight was with a little bit higher weight! There's lots of discussion of speed improvements in the archives, but nothing related to CG location that I could find and certainly nothing so easy to get and of this magnitude. So, my question to everyone is have you had similar experience? Do you know anywhere this has been quantified or further detailed? After all, I'm just comparing two test flights here, but theoretically, I'd guess the decrease in drag due to decreased pitch stability requirements as the CG moves aft would explain the speed increase. Excited! Dave Reel - RV8A Sherman Butler RV-7a Wings Idaho Falls --------------------------------- Be a chatter box. Enjoy free PC-to-PC calls with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:01:45 AM PST US
    From: "Bill VonDane" <bill@vondane.com>
    Subject: GPS Tracking...
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Bill VonDane" <bill@vondane.com> I am looking for some software that I can download GPS track info to = that will display it on a map to show where I have been... Anyone know = of such a thing? Thanks! -Bill do not archive


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:10:11 AM PST US
    Subject: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight
    From: "Lloyd, Daniel R." <LloydDR@wernerco.com>
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Lloyd, Daniel R." <LloydDR@wernerco.com> This has been discussed before on the 10 list. The heavy lift planes of the military will shift loads in flight to do this same thing. How much and to what degree, you would have to talk with a loadmaster, and they tell real interesting stories! So, yes it is possible, but to do it reliable in a small aircraft, without getting your CG stuck in an aft position, is the big risk, and not worth it in my book. YMMV Dan RV10 40269 N289DT Do not archive -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of DAVID REEL Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:48 AM Subject: RV-List: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight --> RV-List message posted by: "DAVID REEL" <dreel@cox.net> I've been exploring the CG range in flight testing of my RV8A and have found an unanticipated cruise speed effect. At 85.9 inches, I was getting 155kias with 2300rpm, 23 in mp, 5,500 ft, and 42 degrees F outside. At 79.6 inches, I got 142kias with 2300rpm, 23 in mp, 4,500 ft, and 64 degrees F outside. My whiz wheel gives true airspeeds of roughly 169kt and 154kt. Quite an improvement just by adding some weight in back. Yes, the fast flight was with a little bit higher weight! There's lots of discussion of speed improvements in the archives, but nothing related to CG location that I could find and certainly nothing so easy to get and of this magnitude. So, my question to everyone is have you had similar experience? Do you know anywhere this has been quantified or further detailed? After all, I'm just comparing two test flights here, but theoretically, I'd guess the decrease in drag due to decreased pitch stability requirements as the CG moves aft would explain the speed increase. Excited! Dave Reel - RV8A


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:10:11 AM PST US
    From: "Charles Heathco" <cheathco@cox.net>
    Subject: Sterio Icom
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Charles Heathco" <cheathco@cox.net> I have a mono flightcom 403 that has alwqys had a slight echo, and it = has a static discharge sound every so often. I want to upgrad and am = thinking Sigtronics steri might be a good choice. Would like coments, = and also will I have to change headst jacks? Charlie H


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:14:43 AM PST US
    From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: GPS Tracking...
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen@earthlink.net> I saw some stuff at my last job - I'll try to contact the guy that had it. It was pretty neat! -----Original Message----- >From: Bill VonDane <bill@vondane.com> >Sent: May 30, 2006 12:00 PM >To: rv-list@matronics.com >Subject: RV-List: GPS Tracking... > >--> RV-List message posted by: "Bill VonDane" <bill@vondane.com> > >I am looking for some software that I can download GPS track info to = >that will display it on a map to show where I have been... Anyone know = >of such a thing? > >Thanks! >-Bill > >do not archive > > > > > > >


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:22:24 AM PST US
    From: "Terry Watson" <terry@tcwatson.com>
    Subject: Re: Fuel Line Firewall Penetration Location
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Terry Watson" <terry@tcwatson.com> Careful, guys. My Superior IO-360-B1B from Aerosport Power is a parallel valve 180 hp engine with Airflow Performance fuel injection, which I believe is also called the XP-360. It is confusing but common practice (and correct, I think) to refer to the heavier angle valve 200 hp IO-360 as the IO-360. They are different engines and require some different accessories. I have the OP-32 RV-7 drawing (it came with my FWF kit), which is for the IO-360. I don't know if the engine-driven fuel pump location is different from my Aerosport IO-360-B1B, but it looks the same as the drawing. Terry --> RV-List message posted by: Dwight Frye <dwight@openweave.org> Jekyll, I thought there may well be a difference ... and it is a pity that builders don't get warned of this until they get the FWF kit. :) Thanks for the heads up! Is the difference due to a different location of the engine driven fuel pump? Or is there some other reason? Can you tell me -where- the suggested location might be? (I've had input from some other folks already, but want to collect as much information as I can.) Maybe the smart move here would be for me to order the OP-32 plan sheet from Van's ... even though my need to otherwise order the FWF kit is months away. (Or maybe I should just order the darn kit, and be done with it. Choices, choices.) -- Dwight do not archive On Tue May 30 10:15:22 2006, Jekyll wrote : > >--> RV-List message posted by: "Jekyll" <rcitjh@aol.com> > >Dwight: > >IO-360 firewall penetration location IS DIFFERENT from the O-360 location. Drawing OP-32 shows the correct location and the parts list. The drawing comes with the FWF. > >Jekyll > > >Read this topic online here: > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=37372#37372 > > > > > > >


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:32:28 AM PST US
    From: "Konrad L. Werner" <klwerner@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: GPS Tracking...
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Konrad L. Werner" <klwerner@comcast.net> Bill, Some Glider guys around my home field use www.seeyou.ws do not archive ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Bill VonDane=20 To: rv-list@matronics.com=20 Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:00 AM Subject: RV-List: GPS Tracking... --> RV-List message posted by: "Bill VonDane" <bill@vondane.com> I am looking for some software that I can download GPS track info to = =3D that will display it on a map to show where I have been... Anyone = know =3D of such a thing? Thanks! -Bill do not archive = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =20 =20 =20 --=20 5/29/2006


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:32:28 AM PST US
    From: "Dan Beadle" <dan.beadle@inclinesoftworks.com>
    Subject: GPS Tracking...
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Dan Beadle" <dan.beadle@inclinesoftworks.com> Try Google Mashups. If you google bike mashup you will find some tutorials. Takes a little fussing around, but it is free. Not aviation based, but you can zoom down on land details. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill VonDane Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 9:01 AM Subject: RV-List: GPS Tracking... --> RV-List message posted by: "Bill VonDane" <bill@vondane.com> I am looking for some software that I can download GPS track info to = that will display it on a map to show where I have been... Anyone know = of such a thing? Thanks! -Bill do not archive


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:32:28 AM PST US
    From: vinnfizz@aol.com
    Subject: Re: GPS Tracking...
    --> RV-List message posted by: vinnfizz@aol.com Try FlightSoft and Vista Moving Map. Vista has a flight record function that will leave a trail of points that follows your movement. Timing of points is adjustable. Ed -----Original Message----- From: Bill VonDane <bill@vondane.com> Sent: Tue, 30 May 2006 10:00:34 -0600 Subject: RV-List: GPS Tracking... --> RV-List message posted by: "Bill VonDane" <bill@vondane.com> I am looking for some software that I can download GPS track info to = that will display it on a map to show where I have been... Anyone know = of such a thing? Thanks! -Bill do not archive


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:39:51 AM PST US
    From: "Dan Beadle" <dan.beadle@inclinesoftworks.com>
    Subject: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Dan Beadle" <dan.beadle@inclinesoftworks.com> This is basic aerodynamics. To get stability (AKA, hard to flare), you move the CG forward. Think Lawn Dart. In this mode, the tail actually pulls down, not up. This results in the wing needing to produce more lift (weight + the tails negative lift so that total lift = weight). If you move the CG back, you have less and less down-lift on the tail, letting the wing work less, thus getting less induced drag. Faster. A heavier airplane, with the same CG, should fly slower than the same plane, same CG, when it is lighter. The reason is the heavier airplane must have a higher angle of attack to produce the needed additional lift. That means more induced drag. The CG limits are set to give reasonable handling. The forward CG is limited by the ability to flare. The Aft CG is limited by the need for positive stability. If we moved the CG back to where the tail was lifting, we would have no stability. In the normal range, as the plane slows from the trimmed AS, the wing and the tail both lose some lift. But the tail is now lifting less in the downward direction, letting the nose fall down a bit and resume the trimmed AS. If we move too far back, we lose the stability feature making the airplane difficult or impossible to fly. Rule of thumb: smooth air, load for aft CG (within limits). Rough air, keep a more forward CG. So your data does make sense. (But the faster/heavier combination is probably just due to aft CG.) Dan -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Sherman Butler Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 8:38 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight --> RV-List message posted by: Sherman Butler <lsbrv7a@yahoo.com> David, That is true in my Bonanza as well, although I have never tried to quantify it. Less drag from less elevator (ruddivator) down force. The Bonanza experts warn of CG change with fuel burn moving the CG aft and the possibility of elevator sensitivity during the landing flare resulting in over correction. Did you notice increased elevator sensitivity? DAVID REEL <dreel@cox.net> wrote: --> RV-List message posted by: "DAVID REEL" I've been exploring the CG range in flight testing of my RV8A and have found an unanticipated cruise speed effect. At 85.9 inches, I was getting 155kias with 2300rpm, 23 in mp, 5,500 ft, and 42 degrees F outside. At 79.6 inches, I got 142kias with 2300rpm, 23 in mp, 4,500 ft, and 64 degrees F outside. My whiz wheel gives true airspeeds of roughly 169kt and 154kt. Quite an improvement just by adding some weight in back. Yes, the fast flight was with a little bit higher weight! There's lots of discussion of speed improvements in the archives, but nothing related to CG location that I could find and certainly nothing so easy to get and of this magnitude. So, my question to everyone is have you had similar experience? Do you know anywhere this has been quantified or further detailed? After all, I'm just comparing two test flights here, but theoretically, I'd guess the decrease in drag due to decreased pitch stability requirements as the CG moves aft would explain the speed increase. Excited! Dave Reel - RV8A Sherman Butler RV-7a Wings Idaho Falls --------------------------------- Be a chatter box. Enjoy free PC-to-PC calls with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:47:29 AM PST US
    Subject: Hanging my IO-320 - lower mount spacer
    From: Gerry Filby <gerf@gerf.com>
    --> RV-List message posted by: Gerry Filby <gerf@gerf.com> Has anyone else had this experience ? I hung my engine this weekend - but I think it needs to come off again. Vans supplies 2 large diameter AN7 washers in the engine mount bolt kit that are to shim the forward faces of the lower engine mounts off the engine so that the mount clears a "step" in the engine casing. The "step" is the mounting flange for the oil sump. All's well on the right lower mount, but on the lower left its as if the shim isn't thick enough, or more to the point, the flange on the engine protrudes too much. Consequence is that mount doesn't sit flush on the engine - its slightly at an angle with the top part of the mount making contact and the lower part interfering with the oil sump flange. Is this a common problem or am I breaking new ground here :) I guess the obvious solution is to pull the engine and grind off the flange on the oil sump mount. I'm more than a little hesitant about doing surgery on my engine. __g__ ========================================================== Gerry Filby gerf@gerf.com Tel: 415 203 9177 ----------------------------------------------------------


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:47:29 AM PST US
    From: "James Clark" <jclarkmail@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: GPS Tracking...
    --> RV-List message posted by: "James Clark" <jclarkmail@gmail.com> I cannot go into details as I am a Beta Tester but take a look here ... http://www.appareo.com/ James On 5/30/06, Bill VonDane <bill@vondane.com> wrote: > > --> RV-List message posted by: "Bill VonDane" <bill@vondane.com> > > I am looking for some software that I can download GPS track info to = > that will display it on a map to show where I have been... Anyone know = > of such a thing? > > Thanks! > -Bill > > do not archive > > -- This is an alternate email. Please continue to email me at james@nextupventures.com .


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:59:44 AM PST US
    From: Larry Pardue <n5lp@warpdriveonline.com>
    Subject: Re: GPS Tracking...
    --> RV-List message posted by: Larry Pardue <n5lp@warpdriveonline.com> On May 30, 2006, at 10:00 AM, Bill VonDane wrote: > --> RV-List message posted by: "Bill VonDane" <bill@vondane.com> > > I am looking for some software that I can download GPS track info to = > that will display it on a map to show where I have been... http://www.seeyou.si/ This is fabulous software, designed for glider pilots. You would have to check to be sure it can handle your data. It is most commonly used with .igc files that glider data loggers generate, but I know some people use it with common Garmin hiking units. Do not archive Larry Pardue Carlsbad, NM RV-6 N441LP Flying http://n5lp.net


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:00:53 AM PST US
    From: "Terry Watson" <terry@tcwatson.com>
    Subject: GPS Tracking...
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Terry Watson" <terry@tcwatson.com> Bill, I don't see it on their website, but Blue Mountain had some software for analyzing data from their EFIS/one that would plot a 3d map of your flight. Terry -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill VonDane Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 9:01 AM Subject: RV-List: GPS Tracking... --> RV-List message posted by: "Bill VonDane" <bill@vondane.com> I am looking for some software that I can download GPS track info to = that will display it on a map to show where I have been... Anyone know = of such a thing? Thanks! -Bill do not archive


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:14:41 AM PST US
    From: "Rob Prior (rv7)" <rv7@b4.ca>
    Subject: Re: GPS Tracking...
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Rob Prior (rv7)" <rv7@b4.ca> > --> RV-List message posted by: "Bill VonDane" <bill@vondane.com> > I am looking for some software that I can download GPS track info to = > that will display it on a map to show where I have been... Anyone > know = of such a thing? I download the tracks from my Garmin GPS into the Garmin MapSource program. It requires that you have purchased some MapSource data from Garmin, of course, so you have a map to overlay it on, but I have most of North America so it works for me. I experimented with downloading the track and converting it to an XML file that I could read into a website and overlay on a Google map... It worked very well, but I found that the performance seriously bogged down beyond about 50 points in the GPS track. It works great for tracking yourself if you're jogging or hiking, but not so good when you fly across country. Here's a website showing how it works for runners. I wanted to do the same thing for pilots, but the API can't handle the large number of points in a typical flight track. <http://www.favoriterun.com/> -Rob


    Message 25


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:15:00 AM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight
    --> RV-List message posted by: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com> I don't see it as an especially big risk, providing it's a fairly simple load move. People don't think twice about putting another person in the rear seat, which is basically what we'd be talking about here, or putting some baggage in the tail. I first noticed this phenomenon in my Sundowner when I brought along a CFI buddy and his girlfriend, who was a pretty chunky chick. It was weird that we had a noticeably higher cruise speed with her, than without. So sure, if you're going to fly X/C somewhere, do the load calculations and if you're way forward on CG, feel free to NOT put that big pile of bags in the rear seats, but move them to the baggage area if it fits there and weighs out properly. Just don't go aft of CG. That's what the range is there for. Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying do not archive Lloyd, Daniel R. wrote: > --> RV-List message posted by: "Lloyd, Daniel R." <LloydDR@wernerco.com> > > This has been discussed before on the 10 list. The heavy lift planes of > the military will shift loads in flight to do this same thing. How much > and to what degree, you would have to talk with a loadmaster, and they > tell real interesting stories! > So, yes it is possible, but to do it reliable in a small aircraft, > without getting your CG stuck in an aft position, is the big risk, and > not worth it in my book. > YMMV > Dan > RV10 40269 > N289DT > > Do not archive > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of DAVID REEL > Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:48 AM > To: rvlist > Subject: RV-List: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight > > --> RV-List message posted by: "DAVID REEL" <dreel@cox.net> > > I've been exploring the CG range in flight testing of my RV8A and have > found > an unanticipated cruise speed effect. At 85.9 inches, I was getting > 155kias > with 2300rpm, 23 in mp, 5,500 ft, and 42 degrees F outside. At 79.6 > inches, > I got 142kias with 2300rpm, 23 in mp, 4,500 ft, and 64 degrees F > outside. > My whiz wheel gives true airspeeds of roughly 169kt and 154kt. Quite an > improvement just by adding some weight in back. Yes, the fast flight > was > with a little bit higher weight! > > There's lots of discussion of speed improvements in the archives, but > nothing related to CG location that I could find and certainly nothing > so > easy to get and of this magnitude. So, my question to everyone is have > you > had similar experience? Do you know anywhere this has been quantified > or > further detailed? After all, I'm just comparing two test flights here, > but > theoretically, I'd guess the decrease in drag due to decreased pitch > stability requirements as the CG moves aft would explain the speed > increase. > > Excited! > > Dave Reel - RV8A > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >


    Message 26


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:20:26 AM PST US
    From: Chris W <3edcft6@cox.net>
    Subject: Re: GPS Tracking...
    --> RV-List message posted by: Chris W <3edcft6@cox.net> Bill VonDane wrote: >--> RV-List message posted by: "Bill VonDane" <bill@vondane.com> > >I am looking for some software that I can download GPS track info to = >that will display it on a map to show where I have been... Anyone know = >of such a thing? > > If you can save the tracking data to a file, and send it to me, I bet I could figure out how to import it into Street Atlas USA. I have automated setting way points from files with lat long points in them. It's possible it will import straight in, worst case I just have to write a simple program that converts the data to the right format. Street Atlas USA is a pretty inexpensive mapping program with street maps of all of the USA and I think some in Canada and Mexico too. do not archive -- Chris W KE5GIX Gift Giving Made Easy Get the gifts you want & give the gifts they want One stop wish list for any gift, from anywhere, for any occasion! http://thewishzone.com


    Message 27


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:53:55 AM PST US
    From: "John Jessen" <jjessen@rcn.com>
    Subject: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight
    --> RV-List message posted by: "John Jessen" <jjessen@rcn.com> Someone, on some list, suggested a system of water bottles that you empty / fill as needed. I know about the Bonanza gaining aft CG as fuel burns, but not sure about the RV's. I think the -10 might. One might have full water on take off and empty as the CG naturally moves aft with fuel burn. The amount of water dependent on the load calculations. John Jessen - Tailcone - RV10 do not archive -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tim Olson Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:14 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight --> RV-List message posted by: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com> I don't see it as an especially big risk, providing it's a fairly simple load move. People don't think twice about putting another person in the rear seat, which is basically what we'd be talking about here, or putting some baggage in the tail. I first noticed this phenomenon in my Sundowner when I brought along a CFI buddy and his girlfriend, who was a pretty chunky chick. It was weird that we had a noticeably higher cruise speed with her, than without. So sure, if you're going to fly X/C somewhere, do the load calculations and if you're way forward on CG, feel free to NOT put that big pile of bags in the rear seats, but move them to the baggage area if it fits there and weighs out properly. Just don't go aft of CG. That's what the range is there for. Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying do not archive Lloyd, Daniel R. wrote: > --> RV-List message posted by: "Lloyd, Daniel R." > --> <LloydDR@wernerco.com> > > This has been discussed before on the 10 list. The heavy lift planes > of the military will shift loads in flight to do this same thing. How > much and to what degree, you would have to talk with a loadmaster, and > they tell real interesting stories! > So, yes it is possible, but to do it reliable in a small aircraft, > without getting your CG stuck in an aft position, is the big risk, and > not worth it in my book. > YMMV > Dan > RV10 40269 > N289DT > > Do not archive > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of DAVID REEL > Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:48 AM > To: rvlist > Subject: RV-List: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight > > --> RV-List message posted by: "DAVID REEL" <dreel@cox.net> > > I've been exploring the CG range in flight testing of my RV8A and have > found an unanticipated cruise speed effect. At 85.9 inches, I was > getting 155kias with 2300rpm, 23 in mp, 5,500 ft, and 42 degrees F > outside. At 79.6 inches, I got 142kias with 2300rpm, 23 in mp, 4,500 > ft, and 64 degrees F outside. > My whiz wheel gives true airspeeds of roughly 169kt and 154kt. Quite > an improvement just by adding some weight in back. Yes, the fast > flight was with a little bit higher weight! > > There's lots of discussion of speed improvements in the archives, but > nothing related to CG location that I could find and certainly nothing > so easy to get and of this magnitude. So, my question to everyone is > have you had similar experience? Do you know anywhere this has been > quantified or further detailed? After all, I'm just comparing two > test flights here, but theoretically, I'd guess the decrease in drag > due to decreased pitch stability requirements as the CG moves aft > would explain the speed increase. > > Excited! > > Dave Reel - RV8A > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >


    Message 28


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:09:42 AM PST US
    From: "Ed Anderson" <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Ed Anderson" <eanderson@carolina.rr.com> Hi Dave, I discovered the same effect in my RV-6A which is a bit nose heavy. Best top speed was when I had the baggage compartment load to the max with camping gear and full wing tanks. I suspect you are correct in that the aft CG results in less down component from the horizonal stabilizer resulting in less drag. The wing incident may also be a bit more optimum (less) also resulting in less drag. As best I could determine my speed increase was between 8-10 MPH. Ed Ed Anderson Rv-6A N494BW Rotary Powered Matthews, NC eanderson@carolina.rr.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "DAVID REEL" <dreel@cox.net> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:47 AM Subject: RV-List: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight > --> RV-List message posted by: "DAVID REEL" <dreel@cox.net> > > I've been exploring the CG range in flight testing of my RV8A and have > found > an unanticipated cruise speed effect. At 85.9 inches, I was getting > 155kias > with 2300rpm, 23 in mp, 5,500 ft, and 42 degrees F outside. At 79.6 > inches, > I got 142kias with 2300rpm, 23 in mp, 4,500 ft, and 64 degrees F outside. > My whiz wheel gives true airspeeds of roughly 169kt and 154kt. Quite an > improvement just by adding some weight in back. Yes, the fast flight was > with a little bit higher weight! > > There's lots of discussion of speed improvements in the archives, but > nothing related to CG location that I could find and certainly nothing so > easy to get and of this magnitude. So, my question to everyone is have > you > had similar experience? Do you know anywhere this has been quantified or > further detailed? After all, I'm just comparing two test flights here, > but > theoretically, I'd guess the decrease in drag due to decreased pitch > stability requirements as the CG moves aft would explain the speed > increase. > > Excited! > > Dave Reel - RV8A > > >


    Message 29


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:14:54 AM PST US
    From: Paul Besing <pbesing@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Sterio Icom
    --> RV-List message posted by: Paul Besing <pbesing@yahoo.com> PS Engineering all the way...can't beat the quality or customer service...not too much more expensive, but the audio quality is far superior, IMHO...I've had both sigtronics and PS Engineering...there's a reason that sigtronics sells "budget quality" headsets and avionics. Spend the extra money on PS Engineering in my opinion. Paul Besing --- Charles Heathco <cheathco@cox.net> wrote: > --> RV-List message posted by: "Charles Heathco" > <cheathco@cox.net> > > I have a mono flightcom 403 that has alwqys had a > slight echo, and it = > has a static discharge sound every so often. I want > to upgrad and am = > thinking Sigtronics steri might be a good choice. > Would like coments, = > and also will I have to change headst jacks? Charlie > H > > > > > browse > Subscriptions page, > FAQ, > > > Admin. > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________


    Message 30


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:18:23 AM PST US
    From: "David E. Nelson" <david.nelson@pobox.com>
    Subject: Re: GPS Tracking...
    --> RV-List message posted by: "David E. Nelson" <david.nelson@pobox.com> Hi Bill, How about these for starters: http://www.gpsvisualizer.com/ - free http://www.obviously.com/gis/gpx_loader.html - looks to be free http://mehere.glenmurphy.com/ - ??? Goodluck, /\/elson On Tue, 30 May 2006, Bill VonDane wrote: > --> RV-List message posted by: "Bill VonDane" <bill@vondane.com> > > I am looking for some software that I can download GPS track info to = > that will display it on a map to show where I have been... Anyone know = > of such a thing? > > Thanks! > -Bill > > do not archive > > -- ~~ ** ~~ Reseach has shown that Mondays account for 1/7th of your time ~~ ** ~~


    Message 31


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:01:25 PM PST US
    From: "Bill VonDane" <bill@vondane.com>
    Subject: Re: GPS Tracking...
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Bill VonDane" <bill@vondane.com> Update... I am not necessarily looking for aviation mapping, but topo = mapping for tracking dirt biking trips... Thanks! -Bill ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Bill VonDane=20 Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:00 AM Subject: GPS Tracking... I am looking for some software that I can download GPS track info to = that will display it on a map to show where I have been... Anyone know = of such a thing? Thanks! -Bill do not archive


    Message 32


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:20:47 PM PST US
    Subject: mixture cable flexing
    From: Erich_Weaver@URSCorp.com
    --> RV-List message posted by: Erich_Weaver@URSCorp.com I have an io-360 with the AFP fuel controller mounted below the sump (vertical induction). AFP supplies nice, heavy duty brackets with the fuel controller for mounting the mixture and throttle cables. However, with the mixture cable in particular, the distance between the firewall pass-through point and the point where the cable attaches to the bracket is very short - maybe 4 inches. This short distance doesnt allow any room for curving the cable and allowing it to flex during engine shaking etc, especially since the eyeball socket at the firewall cable does not allow the cable to slip in and out at all. Do folks generally build-in a little flex in the mixture and throttle cables forward of the firewall, or is it pretty much a straight shot from the firewall to the rod-end bearing? Dont I have a legitimate concern with respect to the need for cable flexing? thanks for any insights Erich Weaver


    Message 33


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:50:26 PM PST US
    From: Larry Pardue <n5lp@warpdriveonline.com>
    Subject: Re: GPS Tracking...
    --> RV-List message posted by: Larry Pardue <n5lp@warpdriveonline.com> On May 30, 2006, at 12:58 PM, Bill VonDane wrote: > --> RV-List message posted by: "Bill VonDane" <bill@vondane.com> > > Update... I am not necessarily looking for aviation mapping, but > topo = > mapping for tracking dirt biking trips... Oh! I use Terrain Navigator for hiking. Works good. http://www.sonic.net/~ed/index.html Do not archive Larry Pardue Carlsbad, NM RV-6 N441LP Flying http://n5lp.net


    Message 34


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:18:06 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight
    From: "Smitty" <smitty@smittysrv.com>
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Smitty" <smitty@smittysrv.com> Funny that this topic came up. Over the weekend, My wife, 10 year old son and I went a short one hour flight in our C172. My 10 year old pitched a royal hissy, wanting to ride in front with me. Rather than argue, my wife reluctantly volunteered to sit in back seat. This was the first time in many pounds since we have done this. The take-off felt a little weird but manageable. When we leveled off I noticed that the ground seemed to going by a lot faster than usual. We were going 15kt faster! On the return fight, my wife made the kiddo sit in the back. Man, that was a long (and slow) trip back. Hmmm, in the future, how do get the wife in the back seat without being obvious? I guess I'll keep my mouth shut and fly slow. Ya'll have a goodun! Smitty http://SmittysRV.com > --> RV-List message posted by: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com> > > I don't see it as an especially big risk, providing it's a fairly > simple load move. People don't think twice about putting another > person in the rear seat, which is basically what we'd be talking > about here, or putting some baggage in the tail. > > I first noticed this phenomenon in my Sundowner when I brought > along a CFI buddy and his girlfriend, who was a pretty chunky chick. > It was weird that we had a noticeably higher cruise speed with > her, than without. > > So sure, if you're going to fly X/C somewhere, do the load > calculations and if you're way forward on CG, feel free to > NOT put that big pile of bags in the rear seats, but > move them to the baggage area if it fits there and weighs > out properly. Just don't go aft of CG. That's what the > range is there for. > > Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying > do not archive > > > Lloyd, Daniel R. wrote: >> --> RV-List message posted by: "Lloyd, Daniel R." <LloydDR@wernerco.com> >> >> This has been discussed before on the 10 list. The heavy lift planes of >> the military will shift loads in flight to do this same thing. How much >> and to what degree, you would have to talk with a loadmaster, and they >> tell real interesting stories! >> So, yes it is possible, but to do it reliable in a small aircraft, >> without getting your CG stuck in an aft position, is the big risk, and >> not worth it in my book. >> YMMV >> Dan >> RV10 40269 >> N289DT >> >> Do not archive >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com >> [mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of DAVID REEL >> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:48 AM >> To: rvlist >> Subject: RV-List: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight >> >> --> RV-List message posted by: "DAVID REEL" <dreel@cox.net> >> >> I've been exploring the CG range in flight testing of my RV8A and have >> found >> an unanticipated cruise speed effect. At 85.9 inches, I was getting >> 155kias >> with 2300rpm, 23 in mp, 5,500 ft, and 42 degrees F outside. At 79.6 >> inches, >> I got 142kias with 2300rpm, 23 in mp, 4,500 ft, and 64 degrees F >> outside. >> My whiz wheel gives true airspeeds of roughly 169kt and 154kt. Quite an >> improvement just by adding some weight in back. Yes, the fast flight >> was >> with a little bit higher weight! >> >> There's lots of discussion of speed improvements in the archives, but >> nothing related to CG location that I could find and certainly nothing >> so >> easy to get and of this magnitude. So, my question to everyone is have >> you >> had similar experience? Do you know anywhere this has been quantified >> or >> further detailed? After all, I'm just comparing two test flights here, >> but >> theoretically, I'd guess the decrease in drag due to decreased pitch >> stability requirements as the CG moves aft would explain the speed >> increase. >> >> Excited! >> >> Dave Reel - RV8A >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >


    Message 35


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:33:01 PM PST US
    From: "Dale Ensing" <densing@carolina.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Dale Ensing" <densing@carolina.rr.com> Hmmm, in the future, how do get the wife in the back seat without being obvious? Smitty, just think back a few years. How did you do it then? anonymous RV-6A do not archive


    Message 36


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:41:03 PM PST US
    From: "Rick McCraw" <rick@n608ef.us>
    Subject: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Rick McCraw" <rick@n608ef.us> I like Dan's explanation, but will add a bit more. Specifically, we require the CG to be forward of the center of lift (CL) in order to have a stable aircraft (and one whose nose drops when the wing is stalled). The closer the CG gets to the CL, the less induced drag, but the less stable the plane will be. If the CG should go aft of the CL, all bets are off in terms of controllability. Another e-mail commented on Bonanzas and how their CG moves with fuel burn. Whether the CG moves aft with fuel burn should depend on the CG of the tank and its fuel relative to the CG of the plane. I fly an A-36 Bonanza, and when weight is up (hence, realistically, with a CG farther aft than when lightly loaded), I have indeed noticed greater pitch sensitivity after a long flight. When I plan flights at higher weights, I check my loading by calculating CG for zero fuel, just to be on the safe side. For extra margin), I try to land with fuller tanks, too. Rick A-36, RV-7 in process -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dan Beadle Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 12:38 PM Subject: RE: RV-List: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight --> RV-List message posted by: "Dan Beadle" <dan.beadle@inclinesoftworks.com> This is basic aerodynamics. To get stability (AKA, hard to flare), you move the CG forward. Think Lawn Dart. In this mode, the tail actually pulls down, not up. This results in the wing needing to produce more lift (weight + the tails negative lift so that total lift = weight). If you move the CG back, you have less and less down-lift on the tail, letting the wing work less, thus getting less induced drag. Faster. A heavier airplane, with the same CG, should fly slower than the same plane, same CG, when it is lighter. The reason is the heavier airplane must have a higher angle of attack to produce the needed additional lift. That means more induced drag. The CG limits are set to give reasonable handling. The forward CG is limited by the ability to flare. The Aft CG is limited by the need for positive stability. If we moved the CG back to where the tail was lifting, we would have no stability. In the normal range, as the plane slows from the trimmed AS, the wing and the tail both lose some lift. But the tail is now lifting less in the downward direction, letting the nose fall down a bit and resume the trimmed AS. If we move too far back, we lose the stability feature making the airplane difficult or impossible to fly. Rule of thumb: smooth air, load for aft CG (within limits). Rough air, keep a more forward CG. So your data does make sense. (But the faster/heavier combination is probably just due to aft CG.) Dan


    Message 37


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:00:17 PM PST US
    From: Joseph Larson <jpl@showpage.org>
    Subject: Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight
    --> RV-List message posted by: Joseph Larson <jpl@showpage.org> Hand her a camera and point out she can take photos out both sides on the way home :-) -J do not archive On May 30, 2006, at 3:15 PM, Smitty wrote: > --> RV-List message posted by: "Smitty" <smitty@smittysrv.com> > > On the return fight, my wife made the kiddo sit in the back. Man, > that was > a long (and slow) trip back. Hmmm, in the future, how do get the > wife in > the back seat without being obvious? I guess I'll keep my mouth > shut and > fly slow. > > Ya'll have a goodun! > Smitty > http://SmittysRV.com


    Message 38


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:39:18 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight
    From: "bdjones1965" <rv_8pilot@hotmail.com>
    --> RV-List message posted by: "bdjones1965" <rv_8pilot@hotmail.com> Couple of points on this topic: 1. A friend said they used to (probably still do) add steel weights to the tail of AT-6's that race in Reno for speed improvements. Can't recall, but I believe they have minimum weights and are probably working with that number but just shifting the CG aft. 2. A few years back I started trying to quantify this situation with adding weight aft. I never got a conclusive answer, but wondered if the benefit of adding ballast to move the CG aft offset the penalty of added overall weight. Example: I am flying (racing) with a near empty airplane. Would the plane be faster with 50-lbs of ballast in the rear baggage compartment than without the 50-lbs? Or faster with 50-lbs of ballast and if I lost 20-lbs?? ;) Seriously, it sounds like there may be some conditions where the added overall weight to move the CG aft may help. Bryan Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=37502#37502


    Message 39


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:11:43 PM PST US
    From: "Jerry Grimmonpre" <jerry@mc.net>
    Subject: Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Jerry Grimmonpre" <jerry@mc.net> Passed on for what it's worth ... I've seen it demonstrated, in the big iron, when the airlines loaded the a/c tail heavy, the elevator would raise the tail and thereby, create an airfoil shape. The hs/elevator would sort of act like an airfoil and create lift. The up movement of the tail would reduce the wing incidence and shed some induced drag. Jerry Grimmonpre' RV8A Electrical > I discovered the same effect in my RV-6A which is a bit nose heavy. Best > top speed was when I had the baggage compartment load to the max with > camping gear and full wing tanks. I suspect you are correct in that the > aft > CG results in less down component from the horizonal stabilizer resulting > in > less drag. The wing incident may also be a bit more optimum (less) also > resulting in less drag. As best I could determine my speed increase was > between 8-10 MPH. > > Ed > Ed Anderson > Rv-6A N494BW Rotary Powered > Matthews, NC > eanderson@carolina.rr.com


    Message 40


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:27:18 PM PST US
    From: Joseph Larson <jpl@showpage.org>
    Subject: Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight
    --> RV-List message posted by: Joseph Larson <jpl@showpage.org> You could do some very careful calculations, then try adding a much smaller weight in the far aft tailcone area somewhere. You wouldn't need remotely as much ballast as something in the baggage compartment - a few pounds would be pretty significant. Not something you would want to do casually. If remotely in doubt, you'd want to reweigh the plane afterwards and reverify the CG information. As you say, 50 pounds of ballast could easily offset the advantages of pushing the CG back. This would at least require far less than 50 pounds. -Joe On May 30, 2006, at 4:35 PM, bdjones1965 wrote: > --> RV-List message posted by: "bdjones1965" <rv_8pilot@hotmail.com> > > Couple of points on this topic: > > 1. A friend said they used to (probably still do) add steel > weights to the tail of AT-6's that race in Reno for speed > improvements. Can't recall, but I believe they have minimum > weights and are probably working with that number but just shifting > the CG aft. > > 2. A few years back I started trying to quantify this situation > with adding weight aft. I never got a conclusive answer, but > wondered if the benefit of adding ballast to move the CG aft offset > the penalty of added overall weight. > > Example: I am flying (racing) with a near empty airplane. Would > the plane be faster with 50-lbs of ballast in the rear baggage > compartment than without the 50-lbs? Or faster with 50-lbs of > ballast and if I lost 20-lbs?? ;) > > Seriously, it sounds like there may be some conditions where the > added overall weight to move the CG aft may help. > > Bryan


    Message 41


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:03:13 PM PST US
    From: "Tom Gummo" <T.gummo@verizon.net>
    Subject: Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Tom Gummo" <T.gummo@verizon.net> Simple, get an RV-4, RV-8 or Harmon Rocket II. If she isn't a pilot, she has to sit in the back. :-) Tom Gummo Apple Valley, CA Harmon Rocket-II do not archive http://mysite.verizon.net/t.gummo/index.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "Smitty" <smitty@smittysrv.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 1:15 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight > --> RV-List message posted by: "Smitty" <smitty@smittysrv.com> > > Funny that this topic came up. Over the weekend, My wife, 10 year old son > and I went a short one hour flight in our C172. My 10 year old pitched a > royal hissy, wanting to ride in front with me. Rather than argue, my wife > reluctantly volunteered to sit in back seat. This was the first time in > many pounds since we have done this. The take-off felt a little weird but > manageable. When we leveled off I noticed that the ground seemed to going > by a lot faster than usual. We were going 15kt faster! > > On the return fight, my wife made the kiddo sit in the back. Man, that was > a long (and slow) trip back. Hmmm, in the future, how do get the wife in > the back seat without being obvious? I guess I'll keep my mouth shut and > fly slow. > > Ya'll have a goodun! > Smitty > http://SmittysRV.com > > >> --> RV-List message posted by: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com> >> >> I don't see it as an especially big risk, providing it's a fairly >> simple load move. People don't think twice about putting another >> person in the rear seat, which is basically what we'd be talking >> about here, or putting some baggage in the tail. >> >> I first noticed this phenomenon in my Sundowner when I brought >> along a CFI buddy and his girlfriend, who was a pretty chunky chick. >> It was weird that we had a noticeably higher cruise speed with >> her, than without. >> >> So sure, if you're going to fly X/C somewhere, do the load >> calculations and if you're way forward on CG, feel free to >> NOT put that big pile of bags in the rear seats, but >> move them to the baggage area if it fits there and weighs >> out properly. Just don't go aft of CG. That's what the >> range is there for. >> >> Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying >> do not archive >> >> >> Lloyd, Daniel R. wrote: >>> --> RV-List message posted by: "Lloyd, Daniel R." <LloydDR@wernerco.com> >>> >>> This has been discussed before on the 10 list. The heavy lift planes of >>> the military will shift loads in flight to do this same thing. How much >>> and to what degree, you would have to talk with a loadmaster, and they >>> tell real interesting stories! >>> So, yes it is possible, but to do it reliable in a small aircraft, >>> without getting your CG stuck in an aft position, is the big risk, and >>> not worth it in my book. >>> YMMV >>> Dan >>> RV10 40269 >>> N289DT >>> >>> Do not archive >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com >>> [mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of DAVID REEL >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:48 AM >>> To: rvlist >>> Subject: RV-List: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight >>> >>> --> RV-List message posted by: "DAVID REEL" <dreel@cox.net> >>> >>> I've been exploring the CG range in flight testing of my RV8A and have >>> found >>> an unanticipated cruise speed effect. At 85.9 inches, I was getting >>> 155kias >>> with 2300rpm, 23 in mp, 5,500 ft, and 42 degrees F outside. At 79.6 >>> inches, >>> I got 142kias with 2300rpm, 23 in mp, 4,500 ft, and 64 degrees F >>> outside. >>> My whiz wheel gives true airspeeds of roughly 169kt and 154kt. Quite an >>> improvement just by adding some weight in back. Yes, the fast flight >>> was >>> with a little bit higher weight! >>> >>> There's lots of discussion of speed improvements in the archives, but >>> nothing related to CG location that I could find and certainly nothing >>> so >>> easy to get and of this magnitude. So, my question to everyone is have >>> you >>> had similar experience? Do you know anywhere this has been quantified >>> or >>> further detailed? After all, I'm just comparing two test flights here, >>> but >>> theoretically, I'd guess the decrease in drag due to decreased pitch >>> stability requirements as the CG moves aft would explain the speed >>> increase. >>> >>> Excited! >>> >>> Dave Reel - RV8A >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >


    Message 42


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:14:57 PM PST US
    From: Charles Reiche <charlieray@optonline.net>
    Subject: Re: stiff brakes
    --> RV-List message posted by: Charles Reiche <charlieray@optonline.net> The wonders never cease to amaze me. Airplanes that fix themselves! Avionics fixed by UPS!!! Do not archive. Charles ----- Original Message ----- From: "Darrell Reiley" <lifeofreiley2003@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:41 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: stiff brakes > --> RV-List message posted by: Darrell Reiley <lifeofreiley2003@yahoo.com> > > Did you read this Charles? > > According to Wheeler North we must be smoking crack. We never even fixed > the brakes on the airplanes we worked on, as bleeding the brakes or even > straightening up a caliper and brake line that was forcing a sideways bind > could never have caused the brakes to have an issue! I guess is was a > miracle... > > Darrell > > "do not archive" > > > Wheeler North <wnorth@sdccd.edu> wrote: > --> RV-List message posted by: Wheeler North > > Most likely is the pedal rocker pivots are too stiff and the small > compensating valve spring in the master cyl can't open, thereby pushing > the > pedal back that last bit. (These are NOT the pedal swing pivots which > allow > for rudder movement) After a bit they either bleed down, or the system > cools > and reduces fluid pressure. > > Check by getting the brakes to the stiff condition then pull back on the > tops of the pedals to force them fully back and see if that loosens the > brakes. (This also assumes the pedal rocker action has enough swing > clearence to let the master cyls fully extend.) > > If this is the case the best fix is to loosen those pivots some as another > spring is something that could break/jam/whatever at the wrong time. > > Air in the line would not cause this as the compensating port allows for > air > or fluid to return immediately. Is also not likely to be gunk in the > caliper > as that would probably not get better after a few minutes. The same would > also be true for the too tight pins that retain the floating calipers. > > The one other option is the matco style parking brake valve could be not > fully opening both poppets thereby acting like one way check valves, if > one > is installed. If the above test doesn't make it better remove the pants > and > get them stiff, then open the bleeder for a tad and see if they loosen. > This > will tell you if the P brake is holding the pressure on. (you could also > try > working the P-brake valve when they are stiff and see if that suddenly > loosens them.) > > W > > > --------------------------------- > Be a chatter box. Enjoy free PC-to-PC calls with Yahoo! Messenger with > Voice. > > >


    Message 43


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:26:46 PM PST US
    From: sarg314 <sarg314@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: mixture cable flexing
    --> RV-List message posted by: sarg314 <sarg314@comcast.net> Erich: I am not flying yet, but I was also uncomfortable with that short run. All connections between the firewall and the engine should have plenty of slack in them. Another local builder whose 6A has been flying for a long time now advised me to penetrate the firewall well above - about 12" above - the fuel controller and have the cable do a graceful "S" down to the attach bracket. That is what I did for both throttle and mixture. You can have too little slack, but too much is not a problem, so err on the side of too much. BTW, mine is a vert. induction, so this may not be an issue for you, but I found the AFP-supplied cable mounting brackets to be unusable on a 6A and made my own which were essentially the mirror image of the AFP brackets. There just isn't room to get the standard brackets to fit around the engine mount tubes on a 6A without hacking away more of the bracket than I was comfortable with. This allowed me to maintain a good separation (about 1/2" as I recall) between the brackets and the engine mount tubes. Also, I had very good experience dealing with Cablecraft. They're expensive, but their cables have a shorter bend radius spec than the cheaper ones from Spruce. They also claim to have a gradual failure mode. I had some shipping damage on my first shipment and they made good on it, no questions asked, no fooling around with UPS claims, so their customer service was excellent. Erich_Weaver@URSCorp.com wrote: >--> RV-List message posted by: Erich_Weaver@URSCorp.com >However, with the >mixture cable in particular, the distance between the firewall pass-through >point and the point where the cable attaches to the bracket is very short >- maybe 4 inches. This short distance doesnt allow any room for curving >the cable and allowing it to flex during engine shaking etc, especially >since the eyeball socket at the firewall cable does not allow the cable to >slip in and out at all. > >


    Message 44


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:30:55 PM PST US
    From: Ron Lee <ronlee@pcisys.net>
    Subject: Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight
    --> RV-List message posted by: Ron Lee <ronlee@pcisys.net> >Simple, get an RV-4, RV-8 or Harmon Rocket II. If she isn't a pilot, she >has to sit in the back. :-) Possible problem is that if she has any hint of claustrophobia she may never fly with you again (at least in a -4). Ron Lee Do not archive


    Message 45


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:52:19 PM PST US
    From: "David E. Nelson" <david.nelson@pobox.com>
    Subject: Re: GPS Tracking...
    --> RV-List message posted by: "David E. Nelson" <david.nelson@pobox.com> Hi Bill, The http://www.gpsvisualizer.com/ does topo overlays. Under 'Draw A Map' -> 'Background Map' -> 'USGS: Topo Map: tiles'. You can also upload your GPS data (2 MB worth) for plotting. There's also some pretty cool demos - look under 'Examples' from the main page. Regards, /\/elson On Tue, 30 May 2006, Bill VonDane wrote: > --> RV-List message posted by: "Bill VonDane" <bill@vondane.com> > > Update... I am not necessarily looking for aviation mapping, but topo = > mapping for tracking dirt biking trips... > > Thanks! > -Bill > > > ----- Original Message -----=20 > From: Bill VonDane=20 > To: rv-list@matronics.com=20 > Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:00 AM > Subject: GPS Tracking... > > > I am looking for some software that I can download GPS track info to = > that will display it on a map to show where I have been... Anyone know = > of such a thing? > > Thanks! > -Bill > > do not archive > > -- ~~ ** ~~ Reseach has shown that Mondays account for 1/7th of your time ~~ ** ~~


    Message 46


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:04:42 PM PST US
    From: Kevin Horton <khorton01@rogers.com>
    Subject: Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight
    --> RV-List message posted by: Kevin Horton <khorton01@rogers.com> --- DAVID REEL <dreel@cox.net> wrote: > --> RV-List message posted by: "DAVID REEL" > <dreel@cox.net> > > I've been exploring the CG range in flight testing > of my RV8A and have found > an unanticipated cruise speed effect. At 85.9 > inches, I was getting 155kias > with 2300rpm, 23 in mp, 5,500 ft, and 42 degrees F > outside. At 79.6 inches, > I got 142kias with 2300rpm, 23 in mp, 4,500 ft, and > 64 degrees F outside. > My whiz wheel gives true airspeeds of roughly 169kt > and 154kt. Quite an > improvement just by adding some weight in back. > Yes, the fast flight was > with a little bit higher weight! > > There's lots of discussion of speed improvements in > the archives, but > nothing related to CG location that I could find and > certainly nothing so > easy to get and of this magnitude. So, my question > to everyone is have you > had similar experience? Do you know anywhere this > has been quantified or > further detailed? After all, I'm just comparing two > test flights here, but > theoretically, I'd guess the decrease in drag due to > decreased pitch > stability requirements as the CG moves aft would > explain the speed increase. > > Excited! A few comments: 1. If you keep the rpm and MP the same, the power produced increases as you increase altitude (due, I think, to the lower exhaust back pressure helping improve the engine's breathing). So, the test at 5,500 ft was with higher power than the test at 4,500 ft. The air temperature was also quite a bit lower for the 5,500 ft test point. I don't know what engine you have, but if you have an IO-360-A series engine, the power at 5,500 ft was about 67.2%, and the power at 4,500 ft was about 65.1%. If you had an O-360-A series engine, the power at 5,500 ft was about 75%, and at 4,500 ft it was about 72.6%. As Alex Peterson mentioned, the mixture setting could also play a role, as you can change the power by changing the mixture, at the same rpm and MP. 2. ASIs have instrument error, and the error will be different at different indicated airspeeds. Static system position error is also different at different indicated airspeeds. Given items 1 and 2, it would be very interesting to repeat these tests at the same altitude. It will also be interesting to record the fuel flow, to be sure it is the same for each test. 3. At a given weight, there is less drag as you move the CG aft (with the CG in approved limits). The tail has to produce a down force to balance out the nose down pitching moment from the wing, and the fact that the CG is ahead of the wing's centre of pressure. The total lift that the wing has to produce is equal to the aircraft's weight, plus the amount of down force that the tail is producing. If you keep the aircraft weight the same, and move the CG aft, the amount of down force that the tail needs to produce decreases. This reduces the drag from the tail, but more importantly, it also reduces the amount of lift that the wing has to generate. So, if you move some item of weight aft (baggage, a body, etc), that will help reduce drag. 4. If you can't move an item of weight aft, some people are interested to know if you can improve performance by adding weight aft. Ideally, the weight you add would be in the area of the horizontal stab, or further aft. In this case, the amount of down force that the tail needs to produce is decreased. This reduces drag, as there is less induced drag from the tail. But, the amount of lift that the wing has to generate has not changed, for as far as it is concerned, we have simply replaced some down force from the tail by down force from gravity on our added weight. So the wing's induced drag does not change. 5. If you can't put the added weight at the HS, what about putting it in the baggage compartment? In this case, some of the additional weight is supported by the wing, and some by the tail. So the amount of tail down force decreases a bit, but the amount of lift that the wing has to generate increases. Depending on how far aft the baggage compartment is, the total drag may be increased or decreased. My gut feel is that in most cases the total drag would be increased. 6. it is very difficult to obtain repeatable speed vs power data. Any one test point may be in error due to poor air quality, not waiting long enough for the speed to stabilize, errors in setting the power or mixture, or errors in recording the data, etc. I wouldn't draw any conclusions from one set of tests. If you can do the same test on three or four different days and get the same speed vs power, then you know you have something. Keep us posted as you do more tests. Kevin Horton RV-8 (Finishing Kit) Ottawa, Canada http://www.kilohotel.com/rv8


    Message 47


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:17:32 PM PST US
    From: Darrell Reiley <lifeofreiley2003@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: stiff brakes
    --> RV-List message posted by: Darrell Reiley <lifeofreiley2003@yahoo.com> Yes, on the UPS fix...has happened a multiple times. In my 14 years of being around aircraft, flying, building, owning a flight school and performing maintenance on my aircraft there's no way I can know anything. But, who really cares... Darrell "DO NOT ARCHIVE" Charles Reiche <charlieray@optonline.net> wrote: --> RV-List message posted by: Charles Reiche The wonders never cease to amaze me. Airplanes that fix themselves! Avionics fixed by UPS!!! Do not archive. Charles ----- Original Message ----- From: "Darrell Reiley" Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:41 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: stiff brakes > --> RV-List message posted by: Darrell Reiley > > Did you read this Charles? > > According to Wheeler North we must be smoking crack. We never even fixed > the brakes on the airplanes we worked on, as bleeding the brakes or even > straightening up a caliper and brake line that was forcing a sideways bind > could never have caused the brakes to have an issue! I guess is was a > miracle... > > Darrell > > "do not archive" > > > Wheeler North wrote: > --> RV-List message posted by: Wheeler North > > Most likely is the pedal rocker pivots are too stiff and the small > compensating valve spring in the master cyl can't open, thereby pushing > the > pedal back that last bit. (These are NOT the pedal swing pivots which > allow > for rudder movement) After a bit they either bleed down, or the system > cools > and reduces fluid pressure. > > Check by getting the brakes to the stiff condition then pull back on the > tops of the pedals to force them fully back and see if that loosens the > brakes. (This also assumes the pedal rocker action has enough swing > clearence to let the master cyls fully extend.) > > If this is the case the best fix is to loosen those pivots some as another > spring is something that could break/jam/whatever at the wrong time. > > Air in the line would not cause this as the compensating port allows for > air > or fluid to return immediately. Is also not likely to be gunk in the > caliper > as that would probably not get better after a few minutes. The same would > also be true for the too tight pins that retain the floating calipers. > > The one other option is the matco style parking brake valve could be not > fully opening both poppets thereby acting like one way check valves, if > one > is installed. If the above test doesn't make it better remove the pants > and > get them stiff, then open the bleeder for a tad and see if they loosen. > This > will tell you if the P brake is holding the pressure on. (you could also > try > working the P-brake valve when they are stiff and see if that suddenly > loosens them.) > > W > > > --------------------------------- > Be a chatter box. Enjoy free PC-to-PC calls with Yahoo! Messenger with > Voice. > > > --------------------------------- Feel free to call! Free PC-to-PC calls. Low rates on PC-to-Phone. Get Yahoo! Messenger with Voice


    Message 48


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:38:59 PM PST US
    From: "D.Bristol" <dbris200@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Re: stiff brakes
    --> RV-List message posted by: "D.Bristol" <dbris200@sbcglobal.net> Darrell, I saw nothing in Wheeler's post that should cause this kind of nasty reply. It was very good information about another possible cause for this problem and did not attack anybody or their ideas. We've run enough good people off this list with this kind of comment and I for one, would like to see it stop. Say something constructive or keep it to yourself. Dave B Darrell Reiley wrote: >--> RV-List message posted by: Darrell Reiley <lifeofreiley2003@yahoo.com> > >Did you read this Charles? > > According to Wheeler North we must be smoking crack. We never even fixed the brakes on the airplanes we worked on, as bleeding the brakes or even straightening up a caliper and brake line that was forcing a sideways bind could never have caused the brakes to have an issue! I guess is was a miracle... > > Darrell > > "do not archive" > > > > >Wheeler North <wnorth@sdccd.edu> wrote: > --> RV-List message posted by: Wheeler North > >Most likely is the pedal rocker pivots are too stiff and the small >compensating valve spring in the master cyl can't open, thereby pushing the >pedal back that last bit. (These are NOT the pedal swing pivots which allow >for rudder movement) After a bit they either bleed down, or the system cools >and reduces fluid pressure. > >Check by getting the brakes to the stiff condition then pull back on the >tops of the pedals to force them fully back and see if that loosens the >brakes. (This also assumes the pedal rocker action has enough swing >clearence to let the master cyls fully extend.) > >If this is the case the best fix is to loosen those pivots some as another >spring is something that could break/jam/whatever at the wrong time. > >Air in the line would not cause this as the compensating port allows for air >or fluid to return immediately. Is also not likely to be gunk in the caliper >as that would probably not get better after a few minutes. The same would >also be true for the too tight pins that retain the floating calipers. > >The one other option is the matco style parking brake valve could be not >fully opening both poppets thereby acting like one way check valves, if one >is installed. If the above test doesn't make it better remove the pants and >get them stiff, then open the bleeder for a tad and see if they loosen. This >will tell you if the P brake is holding the pressure on. (you could also try >working the P-brake valve when they are stiff and see if that suddenly >loosens them.) > >W > > > >--------------------------------- >Be a chatter box. Enjoy free PC-to-PC calls with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. > > > > > > > > >


    Message 49


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:46:11 PM PST US
    From: "JOHN STARN" <jhstarn@verizon.net>
    Subject: the ole -4 vs -8 vs HRII thread
    Cc: "rocket-list" <rocket-list@matronics.com> --> RV-List message posted by: "JOHN STARN" <jhstarn@verizon.net> Since I've flown in the back seat of an RV-4 with & without heel cups and the HRII with them. (6-0 240#) I think I'm in a position to talk. The -4 W/O puts you knees in a very drawn up & uncomfortable position then compared to the same -4 with heel cups. HRII is a whole 'nother ballgame, wider, longer, faster and with larger heel cups. Room to move & reposition during flight. Elbows, shoulders & knees that touch NOTHING (not even parts of the other person in the front seat ie: RV-6,7,9,) unless you want them to. Have not flown in the rear seat of a -8 yet but have sat in one with the canopy closed. Better than the -4 but not as roomy a Rocket. I've said it before BUT I'll say it again. -4 front seat pilots NEED to fly in the back seat With & W/O heel cups. The very FIRST comment when we gave a ride to a -4 builder/pilot was "Wow, those cups made all the difference in the world". Not Wow, what climbing, speed etc you would think about him saying after a Rocket ride. Nope, the difference the heel cups made. BUT don't take my word for it go sit in the back seat of -4 W/O and then with. OR drop by APV & we'll prove it to ya'll. KABONG Do Not Archive ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron Lee" <ronlee@pcisys.net> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 4:28 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight > --> RV-List message posted by: Ron Lee <ronlee@pcisys.net> > > >>Simple, get an RV-4, RV-8 or Harmon Rocket II. If she isn't a pilot, she >>has to sit in the back. :-) > > > Possible problem is that if she has any hint of claustrophobia she > may never fly with you again (at least in a -4). > > Ron Lee > > Do not archive


    Message 50


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:12:18 PM PST US
    From: "Mike Kraus" <n223rv@wolflakeairport.net>
    Subject: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Mike Kraus" <n223rv@wolflakeairport.net> I see the same thing in my -4. Put about 100-120 lbs in the back seat and gain about 10 kts. It is very noticeable. Next time you fly solo, trim out the plane and look at the level the elevator sits relative to the HS. Add a passenger and look again. In my plane with a 120lb passenger, the elevators will be almost level with the HS, but flying solo they are quite a bit different. -Mike -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of DAVID REEL Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:48 AM Subject: RV-List: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight --> RV-List message posted by: "DAVID REEL" <dreel@cox.net> I've been exploring the CG range in flight testing of my RV8A and have found an unanticipated cruise speed effect. At 85.9 inches, I was getting 155kias with 2300rpm, 23 in mp, 5,500 ft, and 42 degrees F outside. At 79.6 inches, I got 142kias with 2300rpm, 23 in mp, 4,500 ft, and 64 degrees F outside. My whiz wheel gives true airspeeds of roughly 169kt and 154kt. Quite an improvement just by adding some weight in back. Yes, the fast flight was with a little bit higher weight! There's lots of discussion of speed improvements in the archives, but nothing related to CG location that I could find and certainly nothing so easy to get and of this magnitude. So, my question to everyone is have you had similar experience? Do you know anywhere this has been quantified or further detailed? After all, I'm just comparing two test flights here, but theoretically, I'd guess the decrease in drag due to decreased pitch stability requirements as the CG moves aft would explain the speed increase. Excited! Dave Reel - RV8A


    Message 51


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:12:18 PM PST US
    From: "Tom Gummo" <T.gummo@verizon.net>
    Subject: Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Tom Gummo" <T.gummo@verizon.net> Of course, marrying wisely helps a lot too. My wife watched me fly an F-4 for twenty years and never even had one thought other than the Pilot sat up front and the other person sat in the back. She picked the RV-4 as the starting point of my building a plane. The RV-4 changed to a Harmon Rocket very early and didn't require reworking. Gummi >>Simple, get an RV-4, RV-8 or Harmon Rocket II. If she isn't a pilot, she >>has to sit in the back. :-) > > > Possible problem is that if she has any hint of claustrophobia she > may never fly with you again (at least in a -4). > > Ron Lee > Do not archive


    Message 52


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:21:15 PM PST US
    From: "dick martin" <martin@gbonline.com>
    Subject: Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight
    --> RV-List message posted by: "dick martin" <martin@gbonline.com> Joe and others, 5 years ago when I first began racing the Air Venture race and others, I added a lead pig (approx 10 lbs) to the tail area of my RV8 to improve the CG. I mounted it just aft of the tail wheel in the tail cone. It fit very nicely and did improve the airspeed. However after a couple hundred hours , I noticed that my tailwheel spring rod was bending (taking a set) . I removed the tail weight and replaced the tailwheel attach rod. I now use a lead shot bag, 25 lbs strapped to the baggage floor and installed or removed as needed with a heavy passenger. The speed improvement is about the same with either of the about the same. On a separate note: I am getting ready for the Air Venture race this summer and would encourage all of you who have flying airplanes to particiipate. Don't worry about not having the fastest airplane. You will learn a lot by participating and competing with the other guys. Dick Martin RV8 N233M the fast one ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joseph Larson" <jpl@showpage.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 5:22 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight > --> RV-List message posted by: Joseph Larson <jpl@showpage.org> > > You could do some very careful calculations, then try adding a much > smaller weight in the far aft tailcone area somewhere. You wouldn't > need remotely as much ballast as something in the baggage compartment > - a few pounds would be pretty significant. > > Not something you would want to do casually. If remotely in doubt, > you'd want to reweigh the plane afterwards and reverify the CG > information. > > As you say, 50 pounds of ballast could easily offset the advantages > of pushing the CG back. This would at least require far less than 50 > pounds. > > -Joe > > On May 30, 2006, at 4:35 PM, bdjones1965 wrote: > >> --> RV-List message posted by: "bdjones1965" <rv_8pilot@hotmail.com> >> >> Couple of points on this topic: >> >> 1. A friend said they used to (probably still do) add steel >> weights to the tail of AT-6's that race in Reno for speed >> improvements. Can't recall, but I believe they have minimum >> weights and are probably working with that number but just shifting >> the CG aft. >> >> 2. A few years back I started trying to quantify this situation >> with adding weight aft. I never got a conclusive answer, but >> wondered if the benefit of adding ballast to move the CG aft offset >> the penalty of added overall weight. >> >> Example: I am flying (racing) with a near empty airplane. Would >> the plane be faster with 50-lbs of ballast in the rear baggage >> compartment than without the 50-lbs? Or faster with 50-lbs of >> ballast and if I lost 20-lbs?? ;) >> >> Seriously, it sounds like there may be some conditions where the >> added overall weight to move the CG aft may help. >> >> Bryan > > >


    Message 53


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:46:39 PM PST US
    From: Paul Besing <pbesing@yahoo.com>
    Subject: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight
    --> RV-List message posted by: Paul Besing <pbesing@yahoo.com> I fly my -4 with a 40lb bag of salt in the baggage compartment (sans passenger of course)...haven't noticed the speed difference, but it does fly better...I'll have to check that out. Paul B esing --- Mike Kraus <n223rv@wolflakeairport.net> wrote: > --> RV-List message posted by: "Mike Kraus" > <n223rv@wolflakeairport.net> > > I see the same thing in my -4. Put about 100-120 > lbs in the back seat > and gain about 10 kts. It is very noticeable. Next > time you fly solo, > trim out the plane and look at the level the > elevator sits relative to > the HS. Add a passenger and look again. In my > plane with a 120lb > passenger, the elevators will be almost level with > the HS, but flying > solo they are quite a bit different. > > -Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com] On > Behalf Of DAVID REEL > Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:48 AM > To: rvlist > Subject: RV-List: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by > adding weight > > > --> RV-List message posted by: "DAVID REEL" > <dreel@cox.net> > > I've been exploring the CG range in flight testing > of my RV8A and have > found an unanticipated cruise speed effect. At 85.9 > inches, I was > getting 155kias with 2300rpm, 23 in mp, 5,500 ft, > and 42 degrees F > outside. At 79.6 inches, I got 142kias with > 2300rpm, 23 in mp, 4,500 > ft, and 64 degrees F outside. My whiz wheel gives > true airspeeds of > roughly 169kt and 154kt. Quite an improvement just > by adding some > weight in back. Yes, the fast flight was with a > little bit higher > weight! > > There's lots of discussion of speed improvements in > the archives, but > nothing related to CG location that I could find and > certainly nothing > so easy to get and of this magnitude. So, my > question to everyone is > have you had similar experience? Do you know > anywhere this has been > quantified or further detailed? After all, I'm just > comparing two test > flights here, but theoretically, I'd guess the > decrease in drag due to > decreased pitch stability requirements as the CG > moves aft would explain > the speed increase. > > Excited! > > Dave Reel - RV8A > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > browse > Subscriptions page, > FAQ, > > > Admin. > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________


    Message 54


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:54:42 PM PST US
    From: "Larry Bowen" <Larry@bowenaero.com>
    Subject: Burnt out MAC indicator?
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Larry Bowen" <Larry@BowenAero.com> One of the rectangluar LED's on my MAC pitch trim indicator seems to be burnt out. Am I the first to have this happen? Guess the only fix is to replace the whole thing? ($86!) - Larry Bowen Larry@BowenAero.com http://BowenAero.com


    Message 55


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:12:49 PM PST US
    From: Darrell Reiley <lifeofreiley2003@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: stiff brakes
    --> RV-List message posted by: Darrell Reiley <lifeofreiley2003@yahoo.com> Maybe you need to read his reply again...! <snip> Air in the line would not cause this as the compensating port allows for air or fluid to return immediately. Is also not likely to be gunk in the caliper as that would probably not get better after a few minutes. The same would also be true for the too tight pins that retain the floating calipers. <snip> This reply is not accurate as it solved our probelm! This is a problem I've dealt with more than once even with hand lever handicap modified levers in RV's... I'm done... warmest regards, Darrell "do not archive" "D.Bristol" <dbris200@sbcglobal.net> wrote: --> RV-List message posted by: "D.Bristol" Darrell, I saw nothing in Wheeler's post that should cause this kind of nasty reply. It was very good information about another possible cause for this problem and did not attack anybody or their ideas. We've run enough good people off this list with this kind of comment and I for one, would like to see it stop. Say something constructive or keep it to yourself. Dave B Darrell Reiley wrote: >--> RV-List message posted by: Darrell Reiley > >Did you read this Charles? > > According to Wheeler North we must be smoking crack. We never even fixed the brakes on the airplanes we worked on, as bleeding the brakes or even straightening up a caliper and brake line that was forcing a sideways bind could never have caused the brakes to have an issue! I guess is was a miracle... > > Darrell > > "do not archive" > > > > >Wheeler North wrote: > --> RV-List message posted by: Wheeler North > >Most likely is the pedal rocker pivots are too stiff and the small >compensating valve spring in the master cyl can't open, thereby pushing the >pedal back that last bit. (These are NOT the pedal swing pivots which allow >for rudder movement) After a bit they either bleed down, or the system cools >and reduces fluid pressure. > >Check by getting the brakes to the stiff condition then pull back on the >tops of the pedals to force them fully back and see if that loosens the >brakes. (This also assumes the pedal rocker action has enough swing >clearence to let the master cyls fully extend.) > >If this is the case the best fix is to loosen those pivots some as another >spring is something that could break/jam/whatever at the wrong time. > >Air in the line would not cause this as the compensating port allows for air >or fluid to return immediately. Is also not likely to be gunk in the caliper >as that would probably not get better after a few minutes. The same would >also be true for the too tight pins that retain the floating calipers. > >The one other option is the matco style parking brake valve could be not >fully opening both poppets thereby acting like one way check valves, if one >is installed. If the above test doesn't make it better remove the pants and >get them stiff, then open the bleeder for a tad and see if they loosen. This >will tell you if the P brake is holding the pressure on. (you could also try >working the P-brake valve when they are stiff and see if that suddenly >loosens them.) > >W > > > >--------------------------------- >Be a chatter box. Enjoy free PC-to-PC calls with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. > > > > > > > > > "Do Not Archive" Darrell Reiley RV7A "Reiley Rocket" N622DR Reserved --------------------------------- Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.


    Message 56


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:09:59 PM PST US
    From: "John Brick" <jebrick@comcast.net>
    Subject: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight
    --> RV-List message posted by: "John Brick" <jebrick@comcast.net> What are we to make of the speeds that Van gives for solo and gross weights? About one mph slower at gross, tandem or side-by side. jb


    Message 57


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:35:20 PM PST US
    From: LessDragProd@aol.com
    Subject: Re: How to add 15kt to cruise speed by adding weight
    --> RV-List message posted by: LessDragProd@aol.com Van's cruise performance testing is usually done at a 8,000' density altitude using full throttle and 2500 RPM. (It helps to remove as many variables as possible when doing performance testing.) I have used a 7,500' density altitude for my RV-3 performance testing. This has been a station altitude of 5,500', at times. I have an RMI MicroEncoder in my RV-3, so I can get a direct readout on density altitude (I believe the outside air temperature is even corrected for compressibility effects). Jim Ayers In a message dated 05/30/2006 9:11:04 PM Pacific Daylight Time, jebrick@comcast.net writes: --> RV-List message posted by: "John Brick" <jebrick@comcast.net> What are we to make of the speeds that Van gives for solo and gross weights? About one mph slower at gross, tandem or side-by side. jb




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv-list
  • Browse RV-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --