RV-List Digest Archive

Tue 05/08/07


Total Messages Posted: 24



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 02:31 AM - Re: Texas Sales Tax Experimental Acft. (PJ Seipel)
     2. 04:13 AM - Re: Texas Sales Tax Experimental Acft.Texas Sales Tax Experimental Acft.Texas Sales Tax Experimental Acft. (Russell Daves)
     3. 04:33 AM - Re: Looking for hangar designer (glen matejcek)
     4. 05:11 AM - Re: N64PR First Flight (Vince-Himsl)
     5. 05:40 AM - Tru Trak EFIS (B25Flyer)
     6. 05:47 AM - Re: Re: Looking for hangar designer (Paul Besing)
     7. 06:08 AM - Re: Texas Sales Tax Experimental Acft. (Bill Gunn)
     8. 06:40 AM - Re: Exhaust Gasket Installation Question (SCOTT SPENCER)
     9. 08:35 AM - Builder's Log Photos (Charles Brame)
    10. 08:46 AM - Re: Builder's Log Photos (Tim Bryan)
    11. 08:49 AM - Garmin 496 - XM Antenna connector (Larry James)
    12. 09:57 AM - Re: Builder's Log Photos (Andy Gold)
    13. 10:15 AM - Re: Builder's Log Photos (Bruce Gray)
    14. 10:48 AM - Re: Garmin 496 - XM Antenna connector (Tim Lewis)
    15. 10:48 AM - Re: Fuel selector structure (Jim Oke)
    16. 11:10 AM - Re: Garmin 496 - XM Antenna connector (Bob J.)
    17. 11:20 AM - Re: N64PR First Flight (John Jessen)
    18. 01:57 PM - Re: Builder's Log Photos (Paul Besing)
    19. 03:01 PM - Re: Builder's Log Photos (Mike Robertson)
    20. 03:43 PM - Re: Aero Classic Oil Cooler (Get a SW) ()
    21. 03:52 PM - Re:N number requirements (Dale Ensing)
    22. 05:55 PM - Compressor & Painting Questions (Doug Medema)
    23. 07:42 PM - Unfourtunately it's time to sell my RV6 (Garry LeGare)
    24. 07:42 PM - Re: Compressor & Painting Questions (linn Walters)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:31:40 AM PST US
    From: PJ Seipel <seipel@seznam.cz>
    Subject: Re: Texas Sales Tax Experimental Acft.
    The sales/use tax in Texas is not new. They may not have been enforcing it, but it's been on the books for a long time. PJ Seipel RV-10 #40032 Bruce Gray wrote: > > And that would be 3 years from the date of purchase of the kit, not the date > of registration. > > Bruce > www.glasair.org > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Kelly McMullen > Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 9:59 PM > To: rv-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV-List: Texas Sales Tax Experimental Acft. > > > > Unless the tax was in place at the time the sale(s) took place, it would > be an unconstitutional retroactive tax. Most state and federal taxes > must be collected within 3 years unless fraud was involved. > Bruce Gray wrote: > >> Seek out the advice of a tax attorney, most states have statute of >> limitation laws. >> >> >> >> Bruce >> www.glasair.org >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> *From:* owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com >> [mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *J. R. Dial >> *Sent:* Monday, May 07, 2007 11:27 AM >> *To:* RV-List >> *Subject:* RV-List: Texas Sales Tax Experimental Acft. >> >> >> >> I do not know if this is going on in other >> states but the state of Texas is sending out sales/use tax notices >> on Experimental homebuilt aircraft. Has anybody else run into this >> and how does the law apply on this. My plane has been registered >> for several years but they are evidently searching FAA data bases >> and trying to collect sales tax as if the plane was bought from >> another person or they want tax on the materials used in the >> construction of the plane. The guy I talked to indicated they want >> tax on the value of the plane which means you would be paying tax >> on your own labor? >> >> If anybody else has addressed this I would >> appreciate how you handled it and what the law requires. >> >> >> >> DO NOT ARCHIVE >> >> * >> >> >> > href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List">http://www.matronics.com/N > avigator?RV-List > >> href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com >> >> * >> >> * >> >> >> * >> > > >


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:13:43 AM PST US
    From: "Russell Daves" <dav1111@suddenlink.net>
    Subject: Re: Texas Sales Tax Experimental Acft.Texas Sales Tax Experimental
    Acft.Texas Sales Tax Experimental Acft. I agree with Bruce (original message below) about providing no information about any purchases. I have read the actual Texas Comptroller letter to one RV-4 Builder and The first sentence of such letter states: "The Federal Aviation Administration's records reflect that you purchased and registered the above referenced aircraft." If I receive such a letter I will respond with a letter that says: "I received the enclosed letter and wish to inform you that I DID NOT purchase the aircraft you inquired about. I BUILT such aircraft and that is why it has as the type aircraft my name on such registration. While I did buy the RV-4 plans and some parts from Van's Aircraft, that was done back in ____ when I started building such airplane. I have reviewed the Tax Publication you sent to me and have consulted my attorney and do not believe that I owe either sales or use taxes on the airplane that I built." Russ Daves N710RV - Flying RV-10 Original Message from Bruce: Tax collectors have been know to use heavy handed and unlawful tactics before. My policy, and I've fought a few battles, is not to provide ANY information to the enemy. Tell them you're not subject to the tax, put the burden of proving you are on them, appeal any ruling up the chain of the taxing agency all the way to the courts, if necessary. If we all did this, they would soon tire and find some other complacent citizen to plunder. Bruce www.glasair.org


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:33:41 AM PST US
    From: "glen matejcek" <aerobubba@earthlink.net>
    Subject: RE: Looking for hangar designer
    Hi Paul- >I wanted to see some plans, some pictures, etc, so I can communicate what I like >to my architect with pictures and other ideas. I'm soley using him for designing >the building to my needs. But, I'd like a good starting point, and it doesn't >seem that there are hangar/home type plans out there like there are home >plans. >I plan on finding a contractor myself, as my architect is on the other side of >the country. At the risk of beating a dead horse, the latest bound copy of the Living With Your PLane directory I have, which is several years old, has 30 floor plans in it. Many of them come with designer and / or builder info. There is a separate section with designer / builder ads. Then there is a fairly comprehensive listing of the airparks across the nation, as well as their details. The whole publication is now online (vs printed) at http://www.livingwithyourplane.com/ . As my particular industry has tanked I'm no longer a member or actively looking at airport homes, but I would strongly recommend this pub as a resource for anyone who is. FWIW, glen matejcek aerobubba@earthlink.net


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:11:42 AM PST US
    From: "Vince-Himsl" <vhimsl@adelphia.net>
    Subject: N64PR First Flight
    You mean these garage queens will one day fly?! You have given me hope! Congratulations!!!! Vince Himsl Rv8(SB) - finish Moscow, ID _____ From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Paul Rice Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 7:04 PM Subject: RV-List: N64PR First Flight Thanks to all who have provided me with info on this site. Today I flew my RV8 with TMX-IO360 and Hartzell Constant speed prop for the first time. Flew straight and level hands off, no adjustments needed. The acceleration is amazing. Now on to the small finish items. Paul Rice


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:40:17 AM PST US
    Subject: Tru Trak EFIS
    From: "B25Flyer" <dougr@petroblend.com>
    All, I was in Springdale and Jim Younkin took me for a ride in the TT RV-9 and I got to fly the Tru Trak EFIS. The autopilot was not enabled and there were some other features that were not working because they were doing flight testing. The screen is INCREDIBLY bright. and the graphics are very bold with thick lines that are very easy to see. The EFIS is smooth as silk. I love my Dynon, but it jumps around in turbulence. The Tru Trak is rock solid smooth. the OVAL HSI looks goofy, but works great. it makes the area where the pointer is very large so the istrument flies like a 6" HSI. The entire unit is very intuitive and with little or no briefing someone should be able to jump in it and fly away. Again, what I flew was a prototype but it will be a really cool box. Tailwinds, Doug Rozendaal Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=111555#111555


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:47:44 AM PST US
    From: Paul Besing <pbesing@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: RE: Looking for hangar designer
    I just subscribed to it, and I must say I was dissapointed. The "floorplans" are nothing but sketches of some peoples home's that have been submitted. Not very much to go on as far as a library of plans you can actually use. I don't know if the bound version is any better, but the online version is not worth the money. Paul Besing glen matejcek <aerobubba@earthlink.net> wrote: Hi Paul- >I wanted to see some plans, some pictures, etc, so I can communicate what I like >to my architect with pictures and other ideas. I'm soley using him for designing >the building to my needs. But, I'd like a good starting point, and it doesn't >seem that there are hangar/home type plans out there like there are home >plans. >I plan on finding a contractor myself, as my architect is on the other side of >the country. At the risk of beating a dead horse, the latest bound copy of the Living With Your PLane directory I have, which is several years old, has 30 floor plans in it. Many of them come with designer and / or builder info. There is a separate section with designer / builder ads. Then there is a fairly comprehensive listing of the airparks across the nation, as well as their details. The whole publication is now online (vs printed) at http://www.livingwithyourplane.com/ . As my particular industry has tanked I'm no longer a member or actively looking at airport homes, but I would strongly recommend this pub as a resource for anyone who is. FWIW, glen matejcek aerobubba@earthlink.net --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:08:22 AM PST US
    From: "Bill Gunn" <WGUNN@dot.state.tx.us>
    Subject: Re: Texas Sales Tax Experimental Acft.
    For Texas aircraft taxes, see the following: <www.window.state.tx.us> (Texas Comptroller home page) - upper right, search for *aircraft*. The Google search engine should show *Aircraft and the Texas Sales and Use Tax (TX 94-168)* dated March 2006 Bill Gunn, TxDOT Aviation Division


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:40:51 AM PST US
    From: SCOTT SPENCER <aerokinetic@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Re: Exhaust Gasket Installation Question
    Some (including me) use silicone as a sealant around the blo-proof gaskets on the exhaust. It performs many functions and has no bad side-effects. Give them a healthy bead of almost any kind of silicone on both sides. Obviously the high-temp stuff sold as gasket sealant is probably best -but even the bathtub variety seems to be tolerant of high temps... just beware some are higher in acetic acid (which is why they are not recommended sometimes for use on aluminum). If it has a really strong vinegar smell then go get another variety. Anyhow... First, it holds the gaskets in place while the rest of the system goes up into place. Second, it lubricates the threads on the studs (smear a little extra all over the threads). Third, it seals any remaining leaks very well -and don't worry about the splooge inside the pipes -it will burn off and come out the pipes leaving the inside flush and smooth. Fourth, it will keep the nuts from loosening and protect them, and the studs from corrosion. (smear a little extra bead around the tightened nut) Fifth, it will make your life much easier when it comes time to take the exhaust system off again. Just put your socket up there over the siliconed nut/stud and start loosening. The stuff will be ground up and cleaned off as you (easily) remove the nut. The stuff is BEAUTIFUL for exhausts! Scott N4ZW (A&P FWIW -and did this on *many* airplanes I used to maintain)


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:35:38 AM PST US
    From: Charles Brame <chasb@satx.rr.com>
    Subject: Builder's Log Photos
    I am within days of getting my Air Worthiness Inspection. I have a pretty detailed builders log but NO photos of any kind. The fFAA AW Application Letter specifies log and photos. Has anybody applied for the inspection with no photos? Any comments from the feds? Charlie Brame RV-6A N11CB San Antonio


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:46:08 AM PST US
    From: "Tim Bryan" <n616tb@btsapps.com>
    Subject: Builder's Log Photos
    I didn't have a builders log or photos and the Designate didn't even ask for it. Another person at the time told me I could just initial the plans where appropriate. Clearly becomes a matter of the inspector you use. A log may suffice. Maybe Mike R. can give better ideas. Tim > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list- > server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Charles Brame > Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 10:34 AM > To: RV-List RV-List > Subject: RV-List: Builder's Log Photos > > > I am within days of getting my Air Worthiness Inspection. I have a > pretty detailed builders log but NO photos of any kind. > > The fFAA AW Application Letter specifies log and photos. > > Has anybody applied for the inspection with no photos? Any comments > from the feds? > > Charlie Brame > RV-6A N11CB > San Antonio > > >


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:49:03 AM PST US
    From: "Larry James" <larry@ncproto.com>
    Subject: Garmin 496 - XM Antenna connector
    Hi Larry and RV-List, So far no joy with Garmin. I've been trying to get Technical Support to pass me up to someone with the answers but evidently Garmin doesn't know anything about that antenna they sell and use. To answer another question about this; I am not using the AirGizmo mount - it uses too much height and its quality doesn't meet my standard. I have designed and built my own mounting and the interference of this USB connector is with the Garmin SL40 that resides right below the 496. My question and predicament remain. Does anyone know if all 5 wires in the Garmin GXM30A antenna are used ??? So far Garmin has been no help. Larry E. James Bellevue, WA Super Decathlon Rocket (under construction)


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:57:38 AM PST US
    From: "Andy Gold" <andygold@rkymtnhi.com>
    Subject: Re: Builder's Log Photos
    The photos are to help prove to the inspector that you actually built the plane in order to get your repairman's certificate. Some inspectors would prefer to see them, some will be happy with you providing other ways to prove that you built at least 51% of it. Your log entrys should be plenty enough proof. In my experience, it just depends on who you are working with and how you get along with him. When I finished mine, I just had a few photos from early in the project, and very few from much past the wing kit. The inspector and I got along and it was no big deal. Andy Builder's Bookstore www.buildersbooks.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles Brame" <chasb@satx.rr.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 9:34 AM Subject: RV-List: Builder's Log Photos > > I am within days of getting my Air Worthiness Inspection. I have a pretty > detailed builders log but NO photos of any kind. > > The fFAA AW Application Letter specifies log and photos. > > Has anybody applied for the inspection with no photos? Any comments from > the feds? > > Charlie Brame > RV-6A N11CB > San Antonio > > >


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:15:16 AM PST US
    From: "Bruce Gray" <Bruce@glasair.org>
    Subject: Builder's Log Photos
    It depends on how friendly your AB-DAR is feeling that day. I've known builders who didn't have a log but none that didn't have photos. Call him before the inspection and ask. Bruce www.glasair.org -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Charles Brame Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 11:34 AM Subject: RV-List: Builder's Log Photos I am within days of getting my Air Worthiness Inspection. I have a pretty detailed builders log but NO photos of any kind. The fFAA AW Application Letter specifies log and photos. Has anybody applied for the inspection with no photos? Any comments from the feds? Charlie Brame RV-6A N11CB San Antonio


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:48:12 AM PST US
    From: Tim Lewis <Tim_Lewis@msm.umr.edu>
    Subject: Re: Garmin 496 - XM Antenna connector
    Larry, I've had similar experience. The mini-USB extension cables I bought didn't work, which I presume is because they were only 4 wire. Wikipedia's article on USB shows (IIRC) that one of the mini-USB pins is normally not used. If you do find a solution I'd be interested in hearing about it. I don't like the interference associated with 90 degree XM connector on the 496. Tim -- Tim Lewis -- HEF (Manassas, VA) RV-6A N47TD -- 900 hrs RV-10 #40059 under construction Larry James wrote: > > Hi Larry and RV-List, > > So far no joy with Garmin. I've been trying to get Technical Support > to pass me up to someone with the answers but evidently Garmin doesn't > know anything about that antenna they sell and use. > > > > To answer another question about this; I am not using the AirGizmo > mount -- it uses too much height and its quality doesn't meet my > standard. I have designed and built my own mounting and the > interference of this USB connector is with the Garmin SL40 that > resides right below the 496. My question and predicament remain. > Does anyone know if all 5 wires in the Garmin GXM30A antenna are used > ??? So far Garmin has been no help. > > > > Larry E. James > > Bellevue, WA > > Super Decathlon > > Rocket (under construction) > > > > * > > > *


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:48:27 AM PST US
    From: Jim Oke <wjoke@shaw.ca>
    Subject: Re: Fuel selector structure
    Patrick; You're right; this is one of those areas on the RV-6/6A where you are pretty much left on your own and the parts supplied may or may not match the plans. Have a look at <http://www.vansairforce.org/projects/okej/onephoto.cgi?Picture_0002.jpg> for how I did mine in the early stages and then <http://www.vansairforce.org/projects/okej/onephoto.cgi?Picture_0525.jpg> for the final configuration. My 683b's are held in place by the heads of the spar plate bolts. The 683 slides a bit to the rear to overhang the spar and then attaches with three or so AN470-4s on each side. At least that's the way I did it. I did not have anything connecting the 683bs to the cabin floor. In the end I deleted the vertical channel with the throttle and mixture, etc. and added a small half round plate to mount the manual trim cable. The removable parts of the seat pans overlap the fuel selector mounting and are notched to clear the F-683 and have a couple of screws going through in it. Try fitting the 683b sides to the 683 top first, clamp in place, adjust the angles to get the holes centered in the flanges and then back drill (carefully) through the spar bolt holes. Good luck and happy building. Jim Oke Wpg., MB RV-6A C-GKGZ Patrick Kelley wrote: > > Ok, Im tired and Im probably just missing this. However, I cant > seem to see anything other than a general depiction on Drawing 32 > (RV-6/6A) that shows how the F683 and F683b go together. (I hope I got > the numbers right, Im going from tired memory.) My F683bs dont look > like that, but I can attach them to the front of the spar as shown. > How is the F683 supposed to attach? In the Orndorff video, George just > uses an angle to attach it to the front of the seat/floor pan and I > didnt spot the F683bs at all. Help, please. > > Patrick Kelley RV-6A Plumbing the fuel and brake systems > > * > > *


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:10:03 AM PST US
    From: "Bob J." <rocketbob@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Garmin 496 - XM Antenna connector
    Guys, Mouser has solderable Mini-USB-B plugs. I would just take a piece of Cat5 cable and make your own cable with these plugs. Part # is 806-KMBX-BPKITST30. USB cables have five pins but only four are used. I suspect Garmin is usin g the #4 pin for something else. Pins 2&3 are data, 1 is +5V and 5 is GND. #4 is normally not used. Regards, Bob Japundza RV-6 flying F1 under const. On 5/8/07, Tim Lewis <Tim_Lewis@msm.umr.edu> wrote: > > Larry, > > I've had similar experience. The mini-USB extension cables I bought > didn't work, which I presume is because they were only 4 wire. Wikipedia 's > article on USB shows (IIRC) that one of the mini-USB pins is normally not > used. > > If you do find a solution I'd be interested in hearing about it. I don't > like the interference associated with 90 degree XM connector on the 496. > > Tim > > -- > Tim Lewis -- HEF (Manassas, VA) > RV-6A N47TD -- 900 hrs > RV-10 #40059 under construction > > > Larry James wrote: > > Hi Larry and RV-List, > > So far no joy with Garmin. I've been trying to get Technical Support to > pass me up to someone with the answers but evidently Garmin doesn't know > anything about that antenna they sell and use. > > > To answer another question about this; I am not using the AirGizmo mount ' > it uses too much height and its quality doesn't meet my standard. I have > designed and built my own mounting and the interference of this USB > connector is with the Garmin SL40 that resides right below the 496. My > question and predicament remain. Does anyone know if all 5 wires in the > Garmin GXM30A antenna are used ??? So far Garmin has been no help. > > > Larry E. James > > Bellevue, WA > > Super Decathlon > > Rocket (under construction) > > > * > > > * > > * > =========== =========== =========== > > * > >


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:20:57 AM PST US
    From: "John Jessen" <jjessen@rcn.com>
    Subject: N64PR First Flight
    Paul, can't wait to see some pictures! Congratulations. John Jessen 40328 do not archive _____ From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Paul Rice Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 10:04 PM Subject: RV-List: N64PR First Flight Thanks to all who have provided me with info on this site. Today I flew my RV8 with TMX-IO360 and Hartzell Constant speed prop for the first time. Flew straight and level hands off, no adjustments needed. The acceleration is amazing. Now on to the small finish items. Paul Rice


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:57:30 PM PST US
    From: Paul Besing <pbesing@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Builder's Log Photos
    He'll know in about 5 minutes if you built the plane or not. I've been told by many inspectors while doing research for KitLog, that the pictures are best for showing quality of work in things like wings before they were closed up. If you kept detailed logs with ALOT of pictures, chances are they'll thumb through a few and call it good. The detailed pictures really help later on when sharing with builders at fly ins, resale value, etc. The most important thing is, if you strayed from the plans in any way, and you can't show it outside the aircraft, be sure you have well documented photos to prove your modification would be airworthy and follows all standard construction practices. Paul Besing --------------------------------- Be a PS3 game guru. Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games.


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:01:24 PM PST US
    From: Mike Robertson <mrobert569@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Builder's Log Photos
    The paper should have said phots and/or builder's logs. Anymore, there are so many RV's around that most inspectors already know the airplane qualifi es under the 51% rule. All the builder's logs are for is usually proof tow ards the repairman's certificate. If you are using a DAR you are more like ly to need the builder's logs. If you are using an FAA inspector he may b e convinced enough that you did the work that he/she may not need the build er's log. I know that it only takes me about 10 minutes of inspection and talking to the builder to determine whether or not he did the work. Mike Robertson Das Fed > From: n616tb@btsapps.com> To: rv-list@matronics.com> Subject: RE: RV-List : Builder's Log Photos> Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 10:43:03 -0500> > --> RV-List message posted by: "Tim Bryan" <n616tb@btsapps.com>> > I didn't have a bui lders log or photos and the Designate didn't even ask for> it. Another pers on at the time told me I could just initial the plans where> appropriate. C learly becomes a matter of the inspector you use. A log may> suffice.> > Ma ybe Mike R. can give better ideas.> Tim> > > -----Original Message-----> > From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-> > server@m atronics.com] On Behalf Of Charles Brame> > Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 10: 34 AM> > To: RV-List RV-List> > Subject: RV-List: Builder's Log Photos> > > I am within days of getting my Air Worthiness Inspection. I have a> > prett y detailed builders log but NO photos of any kind.> > > > The fFAA AW Appli cation Letter specifies log and photos.> > > > Has anybody applied for the inspection with no photos? Any comments> > from the feds?> > > > Charlie Br ==> > > _________________________________________________________________ Change is good. See what=92s different about Windows Live Hotmail. www.windowslive-hotmail.com/learnmore/default.html?locale=en-us&ocid=TX T_TAGLM_HMWL_reten_changegood_0507


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:43:53 PM PST US
    From: <gmcjetpilot@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Aero Classic Oil Cooler (Get a SW)
    Why? It failed in short order and you want another Aero Classic? I guess you could go to the company and demand a replacement. I would step up to real man's cooler a SW cooler. It may cost twice as much, but you get what you pay for. >From: "JOHN HENLEY" <rv7plt@hotmail.com> >Subject: Aero Classic Oil Cooler > >My oil cooler failed. Anyone have any idea who has the >best price these days on Aero Classic coolers? > >John Henley, Rv7, 475 hrs --------------------------------- Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit.


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:52:52 PM PST US
    From: "Dale Ensing" <densing@carolina.rr.com>
    Subject: Re:N number requirements
    To Das Fed aka Mike Robertson Are there any other requirements for displaying the N number on the fuselage of an Experimental aircraft other than; three inches high, horizontal pattern located between trailing edge of wing and leading edge of horizontal stab, and in a contrasting color? Any minimum width of the stroke of the letters/numbers? Thanks Dale Ensing do not archive


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:55:58 PM PST US
    From: "Doug Medema" <doug.medema@comcast.net>
    Subject: Compressor & Painting Questions
    I'm equipping my paint booth and have come up with some questions. I'm planning on buying the DeVilbiss FinishLine 3 HVLP spray gun. This gun takes more air than my little 2hp compressor can deliver so I'm going to buy a bigger one. I'm choosing between the Kobalt 60 gallon single stage from Lowes or the Husky Pro 60 gallon single stage from Home Depot. Both have 15 amp 230 volt motors. The Kobalt has better specs as far as SCFM is concerned. The pump has a cast iron case and cylinder (though the cylinder head appears to be aluminum). It is a single cylinder pump. The Husky Pro has a two cylinder compressor, but the cylinders are aluminum with supposedly an iron or steel sleeve. The Kobalt gives a noise rating of 76dBa which seems fairly quiet for a compressor of this size. Both cost $400. I would probably just choose the Kobalt, but there are some horror stories on the internet about problems with Kobalt compressors and getting them serviced. 1) Anybody out there have experience with either of these compressors? Things you like? Things you dislike? 2) My painting area is quite a ways away from where I have 230Volt power. I was originally planning to buy a 100 foot 10 gauge extension cord, cut off the ends, and wire it to the compressor and a plug that fits my 230 outlets. Those cords are almost $100 right now! I already have 100 feet of 3/8" I.D. air hose. Will I have any problems running an HVLP gun off 100 feet of air hose? 3) I could bring my old compressor into my paint booth and use it's 20 gallon tank as a more local air storage tank. Would this help any problems associated with using 100 feet of air hose? Thanks for your help. I'm getting close to starting the painting process! Doug Medema RV-6A N276DM


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:42:11 PM PST US
    From: Garry LeGare <garry@versadek.com>
    Subject: Unfourtunately it's time to sell my RV6
    Health issues have restricted use of my "6" and finally have made it almost impossible to continue flying. It was completed in 2001 has 260 hr. TT with 190 SMOH on the 0360A3M with Electroair Ignition,new slick mag and a just overhauled Whirlwind 151 3 blade prop, Wolf air/oil separator Chrome Valve covers and intake tubes, Just annualed, and more CUSTOM FEATURES includes:--Center fuel tank(12.5 gal). All carbon fiber tilt canopy structure with special locking access door. Easy removable extended engine air snorkel. Carbon fiber extended vertical fin. Bonded on composite gear leg and intersection Fairing. Special ventilation and heater system with dual muffs, boots on all push rods including flaps and a custom air extractor, means you will be warm or cool, you decide. 3 density Temperfoam seats with lambs wool covering, Single Link tailwheel steering,Carbon fiber elevator intersection fairing, Vortex Generators, Baggage cover, heavy duty canopy cover, Special floor and cockpit insulation, and more. ELECTRICAL:- -B&C 40 amp alt and adjustable reg, 2 new B&C 12 Amp/Hr 400 CCA sealed bats with either or both switching. Over voltage protection, Port on panel for alternator diagnostics, battery charging port. Electric flaps, electric elevator and aileron trim, stabs, dual landing lights with wig wag setting and more. PANEL:--MicroAir transponder and dual MicroAir radios, intercom with built in noise canceling headsets(2) Rocky Mnt Uencoder & Umonitor for engine, ECI CHT/EGT analiser, ECI dual Fuel gauge, Bendix King color GPS, True Track auto pilot, AOA with voice warning, Dynon D10A Efis just factory upgraded, left side throttle/mixtue/prop, controls, G meter, Parking brake, Electonic ignition advance gauge, Sony FM/CD player, Glove box, Wood grain accents, and more It has always been hangered in dry climate area(last four years Paso Robles). The only thing she needs is a paint job,It has been primered since I first started flying. Yes, Laird you are right you should always paint BEFORE flying. This is my baby and I'm going to miss her, hoping to find her a good home. I'm posting it with you guys and the Matronics List before I go to Trade A Plane. So the big question is how much? Any help would be appreciated. Garry "Casper" LeGare


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:42:54 PM PST US
    From: linn Walters <pitts_pilot@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Re: Compressor & Painting Questions
    Doug Medema wrote: > I'm equipping my paint booth and have come up with some questions. > I'm planning on buying the DeVilbiss FinishLine 3 HVLP spray gun. > This gun takes more air than my little 2hp compressor can deliver so > I'm going to buy a bigger one. > > I'm choosing between the Kobalt 60 gallon single stage from Lowes or > the Husky Pro 60 gallon single stage from Home Depot. I'd stay away from single cykinder single stage compressors. they'll run a lot longer with the attendant noise .... whatever it is! > Both have > 15 amp 230 volt motors. The Kobalt has better specs as far as > SCFM is concerned. The pump has a cast iron case and cylinder > (though the cylinder head appears to be aluminum). It is a single > cylinder pump. The Husky Pro has a two cylinder compressor, but > the cylinders are aluminum with supposedly an iron or steel sleeve. > The Kobalt gives a noise rating of 76dBa which seems fairly quiet for > a compressor of this size. Both cost $400. I would probably just > choose the Kobalt, but there are some horror stories on the internet > about problems with Kobalt compressors and getting them serviced. > > 1) Anybody out there have experience with either of these compressors? > Things you like? Things you dislike? No experience with either. I have a two stage 60 gal compressor from Home depot ..... around $350 a few years back. It's worked well with everything I've thrown at it. > 2) My painting area is quite a ways away from where I have 230Volt power. > I was originally planning to buy a 100 foot 10 gauge extension > cord, cut > off the ends, and wire it to the compressor and a plug that fits > my 230 > outlets. Those cords are almost $100 right now! I already have > 100 feet of > 3/8" I.D. air hose. Will I have any problems running an HVLP gun > off 100 feet of air hose? Buy a 100' box of #10 romex. Hell of a lot cheaper than the extension cord and will work fine. > 3) I could bring my old compressor into my paint booth and use it's 20 > gallon tank as a more local air storage tank. Would this help any > problems associated with using 100 feet of air hose? Actually, it will. The hose will stretch in size at full pressure, and the pressure will drop significantly in the first few seconds of paint spraying. The built-in regulator will help too. > Thanks for your help. I'm getting close to starting the painting process! Well it's just my opinion, but I think you'll be far ahead of the game with the romex and the two stage compressor near your painting project. Linn do not archive > > Doug Medema > RV-6A N276DM > > > 2:23 PM > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv-list
  • Browse RV-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --