RV-List Digest Archive

Thu 04/10/08


Total Messages Posted: 11



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:27 AM - Re: RV Safety Record (marknlisa@hometel.com)
     2. 09:21 AM - Re: Re: RV Safety Record (Joshua Siler)
     3. 09:27 AM - RV SAFETY RECORD ( AIRBUS) (Bruno)
     4. 11:15 AM - Re: Re: RV Safety Record (Ron Lee)
     5. 11:38 AM - Re: Re: RV Safety Record (John Morgensen)
     6. 12:44 PM - Re: RV Safety Record (Greg Young)
     7. 03:43 PM - Re: RV7A OVERHEATING (JFLEISC@aol.com)
     8. 04:45 PM - Re: RV7A OVERHEATING (Kevin Horton)
     9. 05:16 PM - Re: Used RV buying best practices? (panhandler1956)
    10. 05:16 PM - Re: RV7A OVERHEATING (JFLEISC@aol.com)
    11. 05:18 PM - Price Reduced: RV-10 Project For Sale (Eric Parlow)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:27:11 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: RV Safety Record
    From: marknlisa@hometel.com
    Scott <acepilot@bloomer.net> said: > I'm really getting tired of this thread. Yes, most accidents are > preventable. But I just don't see where experimentals need to be taking > the rap alone. I've been flying since I was 15, so thats coming up on > 30 years now. Never scratched the paint on an airplane yet, so I'd say > I'm pretty careful. The majority of my time is in taildraggers without > electrical systems so I've propped more airplanes than I've used a > starter. What more can I do to be safe since, thus far, I haven't > contributed to the dismal accident rate? Scott, It is unfortunate you feel unable to engage in a meaningful discussion about this topic -- I'm sorry if I've said something to offend you. It appears from your quote above you are taking all these comments personally, as if people are saying YOU are unsafe. I don't know you, so I can't comment on your personal flying habits, airmanship or professionalism. >From my perspective, the majority of comments are directed at the experimental aviation community as a whole -- not you personally Scott. The suggestion to read the Nall report and peruse the accident reports is simply a means to prove what all of us already knows -- the accident rate in the experimental aviation community is higher than that of the larger GA community. Granted, some of us are much better at assessing and mitigating risk. If your flying history matches your claims, you would appear to fall into that category. My position can best be summed up by a question: What do you do with those 30 years of experience besides keep yourself safe? I say we, as a segment of the flying community with a common interest, have a duty to do what we can address an APPALLING situation -- the fact that we experience PREVENTABLE accidents at a higher rate than the rest of the GA community. I say, rather than ignoring our brothers and sisters who suffer an apparent lack of skill and judgment, rather than assuming there will always be idiots among us who kill themselves, let's assume we CAN, as individuals, make a difference and DO something. Scott, I'm not trying to "win" an argument with you. In fact, I'm deeply troubled by the possibility something I've said may have made you want to retreat farther from getting involved, especially since you seem to have so much to offer. You've been doing something right for the past 30 years, how can we use what you've learned to help those who so desperately need it? Please think about what I've said and consider remaining engaged. At the risk sounding like a broken record, I urge each of you who even remotely believes in what I'm saying to contact EAA and make your voice heard. EAA is our representative organization. It is large and organized. As such, it has the resources to make an impact. If there is any chance of developing and implementing a program that can improve our accident record it will start with EAA. Regards, Mark


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:21:43 AM PST US
    From: "Joshua Siler" <joshua.siler@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: RV Safety Record
    Hi all. Kind of off-topic to this thread but certainly on topic for the question of safety... I was surfing reddit.com today and randomly found a link with a picture of an RV mid somersault with it's prop in the dirt. Does anyone know the story behind this picture? http://img.funtasticus.org/2008/apr/moment1948/moment047.jpg Josh On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 5:23 AM, <marknlisa@hometel.com> wrote: > > Scott <acepilot@bloomer.net> said: > > > I'm really getting tired of this thread. Yes, most accidents are > > preventable. But I just don't see where experimentals need to be taking > > the rap alone. I've been flying since I was 15, so thats coming up on > > 30 years now. Never scratched the paint on an airplane yet, so I'd say > > I'm pretty careful. The majority of my time is in taildraggers without > > electrical systems so I've propped more airplanes than I've used a > > starter. What more can I do to be safe since, thus far, I haven't > > contributed to the dismal accident rate? > > Scott, > > It is unfortunate you feel unable to engage in a meaningful discussion > about this topic -- I'm sorry if I've said something to offend you. > > It appears from your quote above you are taking all these comments > personally, as if people are saying YOU are unsafe. I don't know you, so I > can't comment on your personal flying habits, airmanship or professionalism. > > >From my perspective, the majority of comments are directed at the > experimental aviation community as a whole -- not you personally Scott. The > suggestion to read the Nall report and peruse the accident reports is simply > a means to prove what all of us already knows -- the accident rate in the > experimental aviation community is higher than that of the larger GA > community. > > Granted, some of us are much better at assessing and mitigating risk. If > your flying history matches your claims, you would appear to fall into that > category. My position can best be summed up by a question: What do you do > with those 30 years of experience besides keep yourself safe? > > I say we, as a segment of the flying community with a common interest, > have a duty to do what we can address an APPALLING situation -- the fact > that we experience PREVENTABLE accidents at a higher rate than the rest of > the GA community. > > I say, rather than ignoring our brothers and sisters who suffer an > apparent lack of skill and judgment, rather than assuming there will always > be idiots among us who kill themselves, let's assume we CAN, as individuals, > make a difference and DO something. > > Scott, I'm not trying to "win" an argument with you. In fact, I'm deeply > troubled by the possibility something I've said may have made you want to > retreat farther from getting involved, especially since you seem to have so > much to offer. You've been doing something right for the past 30 years, how > can we use what you've learned to help those who so desperately need it? > Please think about what I've said and consider remaining engaged. > > At the risk sounding like a broken record, I urge each of you who even > remotely believes in what I'm saying to contact EAA and make your voice > heard. EAA is our representative organization. It is large and organized. As > such, it has the resources to make an impact. If there is any chance of > developing and implementing a program that can improve our accident record > it will start with EAA. > > Regards, > > Mark > > -- Joshua Siler 503-819-8919


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:27:12 AM PST US
    From: Bruno <rv4@videotron.ca>
    Subject: RV SAFETY RECORD ( AIRBUS)
    Oops, forget > that. Airbus tried that. Remember the Paris Air > Show when the computer > landed the Airbus in the woods? ------------------------------------------------------ By the way the accident didn't happen at the Paris Airshow but in Mulhose. The computers did not land the A/C in the woods, the pilots did. That what happen when pilots want to be ''Hot Dogs'' ( Two Check Airmen on top of that ).Pull the circuit breakers to disengage the computers, end up in Direct Law ( no stall protection among others) and you have a perfectly serviceable aircraft in the woods. After 2000 hrs + on A-320, I learned that the Airbuses are fantastic aircrafts if flown the way they are supposed to be, like any other a/c. The pilots (Captain) was charged with manslaughter but the case is still in court on appeal.. Bruno Dionne RV-4 (Flying)


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:15:00 AM PST US
    From: "Ron Lee" <ronlee@pcisys.net>
    Subject: Re: RV Safety Record
    I believe that was in England. I never heard what caused the flip. Ron Lee ----- Original Message ----- From: Joshua Siler To: rv-list@matronics.com Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 10:17 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: Re: RV Safety Record Hi all. Kind of off-topic to this thread but certainly on topic for the question of safety... I was surfing reddit.com today and randomly found a link with a picture of an RV mid somersault with it's prop in the dirt. Does anyone know the story behind this picture? http://img.funtasticus.org/2008/apr/moment1948/moment047.jpg Josh


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:38:49 AM PST US
    From: John Morgensen <john@morgensen.com>
    Subject: Re: RV Safety Record
    There is a whole sequence of shots for this event. It occurred at a fly-in in the UK. I don't have a link handy, but the discussion centered around the nose gear issue on the RV-A models. john Joshua Siler wrote: > Hi all. Kind of off-topic to this thread but certainly on topic for > the question of safety... I was surfing reddit.com <http://reddit.com> > today and randomly found a link with a picture of an RV mid somersault > with it's prop in the dirt. Does anyone know the story behind this > picture? > > http://img.funtasticus.org/2008/apr/moment1948/moment047.jpg > > Josh > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 5:23 AM, <marknlisa@hometel.com > <mailto:marknlisa@hometel.com>> wrote: > > <mailto:marknlisa@hometel.com> > > Scott <acepilot@bloomer.net <mailto:acepilot@bloomer.net>> said: > > > I'm really getting tired of this thread. Yes, most accidents are > > preventable. But I just don't see where experimentals need to > be taking > > the rap alone. I've been flying since I was 15, so thats coming > up on > > 30 years now. Never scratched the paint on an airplane yet, so > I'd say > > I'm pretty careful. The majority of my time is in taildraggers > without > > electrical systems so I've propped more airplanes than I've used a > > starter. What more can I do to be safe since, thus far, I haven't > > contributed to the dismal accident rate? > > Scott, > > It is unfortunate you feel unable to engage in a meaningful > discussion about this topic -- I'm sorry if I've said something to > offend you. > > It appears from your quote above you are taking all these comments > personally, as if people are saying YOU are unsafe. I don't know > you, so I can't comment on your personal flying habits, airmanship > or professionalism. > > >From my perspective, the majority of comments are directed at the > experimental aviation community as a whole -- not you personally > Scott. The suggestion to read the Nall report and peruse the > accident reports is simply a means to prove what all of us already > knows -- the accident rate in the experimental aviation community > is higher than that of the larger GA community. > > Granted, some of us are much better at assessing and mitigating > risk. If your flying history matches your claims, you would appear > to fall into that category. My position can best be summed up by a > question: What do you do with those 30 years of experience besides > keep yourself safe? > > I say we, as a segment of the flying community with a common > interest, have a duty to do what we can address an APPALLING > situation -- the fact that we experience PREVENTABLE accidents at > a higher rate than the rest of the GA community. > > I say, rather than ignoring our brothers and sisters who suffer an > apparent lack of skill and judgment, rather than assuming there > will always be idiots among us who kill themselves, let's assume > we CAN, as individuals, make a difference and DO something. > > Scott, I'm not trying to "win" an argument with you. In fact, I'm > deeply troubled by the possibility something I've said may have > made you want to retreat farther from getting involved, especially > since you seem to have so much to offer. You've been doing > something right for the past 30 years, how can we use what you've > learned to help those who so desperately need it? Please think > about what I've said and consider remaining engaged. > > At the risk sounding like a broken record, I urge each of you who > even remotely believes in what I'm saying to contact EAA and make > your voice heard. EAA is our representative organization. It is > large and organized. As such, it has the resources to make an > impact. If there is any chance of developing and implementing a > program that can improve our accident record it will start with EAA. > > Regards, > > Mark > > > -- > Joshua Siler > 503-819-8919 > * > > > *


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:44:44 PM PST US
    From: "Greg Young" <gyoung@cs-sol.com>
    Subject: RV Safety Record
    As one who has contributed to the accident stats I have a unique, if unwanted, perspective of some simple things we can all do. I got a lot of help in double checking the plane and adding extra padding to the glareshield. One person though told me afterward that he had noticed black smoke during my earlier engine starts but didn't say anything. I wish he had. In talking to Don at AFP it was not the cause but it might have caused me to step back and run more tests. I also wish someone would have suggested waiting until morning rather than launching on a 104 degree afternoon. I thought I was pretty well prepared for my flight but there is always something more and others' perspectives and observations are valuable. I don't know if it would have changed the outcome but knowing there was a path not taken is one of the few things that continues to bug me. Maybe just a hint is all it takes for someone to rethink their actions and choose a different path. I used to be quiet like most. Not any more. I've called the tower when I thought certain controllers were unsafe. I tell friends (and strangers) when I see something wearing, when their engine just doesn't sound right or just when something strikes me as off but I don't know why. I've even nagged them when they didn't take action I thought they should. I'll weigh in with an opinion on their judgment calls. So far no one's objected and most are appreciative of another viewpoint regardless of what they decide to do. I view my own judgment calls in a different light as well but I'm not immune so I hope others will do the same for me. Think of what your reaction would be after something happens. If you think you'd regret not having done or said something then do it up front. Regards, Greg Young > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of > marknlisa@hometel.com > Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 7:23 AM > To: rv-list@matronics.com > Subject: RV-List: Re: RV Safety Record > > > Scott <acepilot@bloomer.net> said: > > > I say, rather than ignoring our brothers and sisters who > suffer an apparent lack of skill and judgment, rather than > assuming there will always be idiots among us who kill > themselves, let's assume we CAN, as individuals, make a > difference and DO something. >


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:43:22 PM PST US
    From: JFLEISC@aol.com
    Subject: Re: RV7A OVERHEATING
    In a message dated 4/9/2008 9:07:44 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, khorton01@rogers.com writes: Congratulations. At the start, you were unhappy with both the high engine temperatures and the low TAS. Now you have managed to improve both the cooling and the speed. How much has the speed increased, and what changes did you make that affected the speed? 10 years of operating air cooled engines on a dynamometer has taught me that increases in cooling increases volumetric efficiency, thus more power (astounding differences some times). Could be it. Jim (http://travel.aol.com/travel-guide/united-states?ncid=aoltrv00030000000016)


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:45:09 PM PST US
    From: Kevin Horton <khorton01@rogers.com>
    Subject: Re: RV7A OVERHEATING
    On 10 Apr 2008, at 18:39, JFLEISC@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 4/9/2008 9:07:44 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > khorton01@rogers.com writes: > Congratulations. > > At the start, you were unhappy with both the high engine > temperatures and the low TAS. Now you have managed to improve both > the cooling and the speed. How much has the speed increased, and > what changes did you make that affected the speed? > 10 years of operating air cooled engines on a dynamometer has > taught me that increases in cooling increases volumetric > efficiency, thus more power (astounding differences some times). > Could be it. Interesting. Do you mean that you actually measured an increase in the volume of air being inducted, or are you inferring the increase in volumetric efficiency from a measured increase in power? -- Kevin Horton RV-8 (FInal Assembly) Ottawa, Canada http://www.kilohotel.com/rv8


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:16:16 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Used RV buying best practices?
    From: "panhandler1956" <panhandler1956@gmail.com>
    Good idea Tedd. I added a couple of points to the wiki: vans service bulletins and sloshed fuel tanks -------- Brent O. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=176026#176026


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:16:16 PM PST US
    From: JFLEISC@aol.com
    Subject: Re: RV7A OVERHEATING
    In a message dated 4/10/2008 7:47:19 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, khorton01@rogers.com writes: Congratulations. At the start, you were unhappy with both the high engine temperatures and the low TAS. Now you have managed to improve both the cooling and the speed. How much has the speed increased, and what changes did you make that affected the speed? 10 years of operating air cooled engines on a dynamometer has taught me that increases in cooling increases volumetric efficiency, thus more power (astounding differences some times). Could be it. Interesting. Do you mean that you actually measured an increase in the volume of air being inducted, or are you inferring the increase in volumetric efficiency from a measured increase in power? Absolute measured increase in power. Think about it; You can fit more air in a cold box than a hot one of the same size. Bolye's law. Jim (http://travel.aol.com/travel-guide/united-states?ncid=aoltrv00030000000016)


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:18:01 PM PST US
    From: Eric Parlow <ericparlow@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Price Reduced: RV-10 Project For Sale
    RV-10 project for sale.REDUCED TO $99,900 FOR QUICK SALE! See add in Barnstormers.com and Trade-A-PlaneIncludes all materials to comp lete a flying plane except engine & prop. Full Garmin WAAS IFR instrument p ackage. GNS430W, SL30, GTX327, GI-106A, PMA800SR, LifeSaver 4300 AI, CO Mon itor, BMA EFISone w/ Autopilot and Powerboard. Rudder tim w/ position displ ay for trims and flaps. ELO Touchscreen monitor w/ switch to display EFIS o r computer to Co-pilot. All Van's kits including FWF. Accuracy Avionics ove rhead console and window trim rings. All systems installed including dual b attery Z-14 FADEC based electrical systems. CAD drawings of all system sche matics. To finish it needs: engine, prop, interior, paint, ~1000 hours labo r. Engine $39,200 (Vans)Prop $6,510 (Vans)Interior $3,182 (Flightline)Paint ~$ 8,000 (?) Total ~$56,892 to finish A flying full IFR RV-10 for $156,792! A few photos attached. ERic--(828) 777-7976Williamsport, PA panel4 (Medium).jpg Transfer 12-25-06 192 (Medium).jpg Transfer 1-30-07 048 (Small).jpg Transfer 2-5-07 033 (Small).jpg Transfer 2-5-07 034 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 120 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 121 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 131 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 134 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 138 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 146 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 150 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 170 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 194 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 207 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 213 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 214 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 217 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 221 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 223 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 224 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 226 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 228 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 229 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 230 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 231 (Small).jpg




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv-list
  • Browse RV-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --