Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 11:57 AM - Oil Pressure Variation (John Fasching)
2. 03:23 PM - Large attachments (Ron Lee)
3. 04:16 PM - Re: Large attachments (John Morgensen)
4. 04:18 PM - Re: Large attachments (John Fasching)
5. 04:26 PM - Re: Large attachments (Linn Walters)
6. 08:05 PM - Re: Large attachments (Jerry Springer)
7. 08:17 PM - Re: Seats, Misc... (Matt Dralle)
8. 08:42 PM - Std vs. Aerobatic Engine Vibration Mounts... (Matt Dralle)
9. 08:54 PM - Re: Large attachments (Mark Grieve)
10. 09:12 PM - Re: Large attachments (Robin Marks)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Oil Pressure Variation |
I appreciate all the suggestions. This morning I drained the oil. Opened
the oil pressure relief valve, looked clean, but swabbed it 6 times with
a q-tip dipped in acetone to be sure. Spring was OK.
Opened the oil screen...clean as it could be...
Changed oil filter...cut open old filter, put the filter material in
acetone and washed it out real good...used a magnet to see if there was
any material in the bottom of the bucket...came up perfectly
clean..absolutely nothing. Visual inspection of the filter material
showed nothing...no little sparkles or any foreign material.
Ran the engine after the oil change....pressure came up immediately and
ran about 62psi at 900rpm, and came up to 80psi at 1700 rpm...oil was at
ambient temp, around 75-deg F. All seems OK.
Will fly tomorrow and get altitude and stay within gliding range of the
airport and fly for an hour and see what happens. I hope there was some
small bit of junk on the ball in the pressure relief valve that I did
not see.
My oil pump gear has the last AD per Carter who did the overhaul of the
engine, that now as 513-hours on it. Never has used oil, always had
changes of Aeroshall 15-50 every 4 months...never missed a change of oil
or filter.
Will post results.
John at Salida, CO
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Large attachments |
I just had a file come through that had an attachment or embedded
picture that was over 3 Meg in size. With dialup that is unacceptable.
Please use smaller files/embedded picture sizes.
Ron Lee
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Large attachments |
Agreed. It is always best to be careful.
Ron - Can your email program skip large messages? In Thunderbird on my
laptop, it fetches the first part of the text and then displays a
message allowing the rest of to be downloaded or ignored.
John
Ron Lee wrote:
> I just had a file come through that had an attachment or embedded
> picture that was over 3 Meg in size. With dialup that is unacceptable.
>
> Please use smaller files/embedded picture sizes.
>
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Large attachments |
I agree. I have had several in the last few days that tied up my dialup
system FOR OVER AN HOUR. The sender was advertising some things he
wanted to sell. That's fine, but how about reduceing the size (mb) to
mere kb ... the photo will still be just fine; we don't need ultra pixel
fidelity.
----- Original Message -----
From: Ron Lee
To: rv-list@matronics.com
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 4:13 PM
Subject: RV-List: Large attachments
I just had a file come through that had an attachment or embedded
picture that was over 3 Meg in size. With dialup that is
unacceptable.
Please use smaller files/embedded picture sizes.
Ron Lee
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Large attachments |
I reduce all pics I send over the I'net to 640X480. Aught to be a
'standard' ..... which it is, kinda.
Linn
do not archive
John Fasching wrote:
> I agree. I have had several in the last few days that tied up my dialup
> system FOR OVER AN HOUR. The sender was advertising some things he
> wanted to sell. That's fine, but how about reduceing the size (mb) to
> mere kb ... the photo will still be just fine; we don't need ultra pixel
> fidelity.
>
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Large attachments |
From who? I have not received any large files from anyone on the
RV-list. Matt posted some pictures of his RV-8 seats.
Beautiful seats Matt, only question is where does the kitchen sink go? ;-)
Jerry
do not archive
John Morgensen wrote:
> Agreed. It is always best to be careful.
>
> Ron - Can your email program skip large messages? In Thunderbird on my
> laptop, it fetches the first part of the text and then displays a
> message allowing the rest of to be downloaded or ignored.
>
> John
>
> Ron Lee wrote:
>> I just had a file come through that had an attachment or embedded
>> picture that was over 3 Meg in size. With dialup that is unacceptable.
>>
>> Please use smaller files/embedded picture sizes.
>>
> *
>
>
> *
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Seats, Misc... |
At 08:01 PM 8/14/2009 Friday, you wrote:
>
> From who? I have not received any large files from anyone on the RV-list. Matt
posted some pictures of his RV-8 seats.
>
>Beautiful seats Matt, only question is where does the kitchen sink go? ;-)
>
>Jerry
>do not archive
Thanks Jerry!
Ah! A kitchen sink... Thanks for reminding me!
IO-390 goes on the front this weekend!!! Yahoo!
Matt Dralle
RV-8 #82880 N998RV
http://www.mykitlog.com/dralle
Message 8
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Std vs. Aerobatic Engine Vibration Mounts... |
There was some discussion a while back regarding the Standard engine vibration
mounts verses the Aerobatic style. I happen to have a set of each and thought
others might be interested in seeing what the physical differences actually are.
You can see from the pictures, that one half is exactly the same. It is
very hard and appears to have a "washer" of some sort molded into the rubber about
halfway. The rubber is very hard. It carries the part number "VIP50901-78".
The other side, however, is different between the two types. On the Aerobatic
style, the other side is simply just another one of the first side. It has the
washer inside and appears to carry the exact same part number as a matter of
fact (VIP50901-78). On the Standard mounts, however, the other mount is signifificantly
different and carries a different part number (VIP50900-71). As you
can see from the picture, it is taller by about 25%, it doesn't have the internal
washer, and the rubber seems to be a lot softer. On the softness of the
rubber, it might just be that it feels that way because there is more of it
without any objects molded into it. But I think it does feel a little softer.
The long bushing is also a bit longer on the Standard version.
What does it all really mean? I don't know, but the aerobatic ones seem more manly,
so that's what I'm going to go with... ;-) And, furthermore, I like my
engines mounted like I like breasts on woman - firm, baby, FIRM! :-)
Matt Dralle
RV-8 #82880 N998RV
http://www.mykitlog.com/dralle
Message 9
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Large attachments |
The silly thing is that Windows XP and Vista make it so easy to avoid
this sort of thing. If you are viewing a picture and then right click
and then send, the program will offer to resize the picture. I work at
an ISP and big attachments clogging up dialup mail accounts is our most
common help desk problem.
Mark
Ron Lee wrote:
> I just had a file come through that had an attachment or embedded
> picture that was over 3 Meg in size. With dialup that is unacceptable.
>
> Please use smaller files/embedded picture sizes.
>
> Ron Lee
> *
>
>
> *
Message 10
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Large attachments |
I am sure it was a post from me. I sent 3 photos totaling 1.2
(one-point-two) Mb offing to sell an RV-8 Cowl at a significant
discount. I assumed I was doing a service to some -8 builder on a budget
(not a money making venture). I could have slimmed down the images even
further but I wanted to make sure the prospective buyer was able to see
detail. Sorry it's been about 16 years since I was dial up.
Robin
Do Not Archive
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jerry Springer
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 8:02 PM
Subject: Re: RV-List: Large attachments
From who? I have not received any large files from anyone on the
RV-list. Matt posted some pictures of his RV-8 seats.
Beautiful seats Matt, only question is where does the kitchen sink go?
;-)
Jerry
do not archive
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|