RV-List Digest Archive

Sun 06/06/10


Total Messages Posted: 8



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 07:35 AM - Piece of Grass 2010 refunds (Bob Collins)
     2. 08:40 AM - Re: Piece of Grass 2010 refunds (H. Ivan Haecker)
     3. 10:38 AM - Chainsaw Propeller Carving (Helsper)
     4. 01:24 PM - Re: some approx V speeds (HCRV6@comcast.net)
     5. 02:13 PM - Re: Fw: List Introduction & Main spar falls off workbench (Charlie England)
     6. 03:51 PM - Re: some approx V speeds (Ed Anderson)
     7. 06:45 PM - KCDC (don wentz)
     8. 09:29 PM - engine serial number? (thomas sargent)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:35:34 AM PST US
    From: "Bob Collins" <bcollinsrv7a@comcast.net>
    Subject: Piece of Grass 2010 refunds
    You've probably heard by now that the spot on which we have had the RV get-together at Oshkosh ("Piece of Grass") for (most of) the last 6 years is not likely to be available to us because EAA is moving the 24-hour generator area out to the middle of the field at Camp Scholler (I don't really want to camp in a truck stop), which is where people have always been able to find us (because we told them exactly where we'll be). But EAA has still not made maps available for the new Camp Scholler design and because it's unclear what the net effect of displacing tenters (like me) from that area, I'm in no position to say where my camp area will end up at. A couple of alternative locations have fallen apart (it would appear the Van's dinner is the most likely spot for those who wish to socialize). A lot of people donated a lot of money to secure 6 camping sites for the event, and we won't be needing them, so a week or so ago -- because of the uncertainty -- I returned it via PayPayl (for those of you who submitted it via PayPal). For those of you who sent checks, I've simply shredded the checks and you should "void" them in your register. If you HAVEN'T received a refund, please contact me ASAP. Thanks.


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:40:06 AM PST US
    From: "H. Ivan Haecker" <baremetl@gvtc.com>
    Subject: Re: Piece of Grass 2010 refunds
    MessageAh, thats what's meant by the term "EAA in Action"! Ivan Haecker ----- Original Message ----- From: Bob Collins To: rv-list@matronics.com Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2010 9:24 AM Subject: RV-List: Piece of Grass 2010 refunds You've probably heard by now that the spot on which we have had the RV get-together at Oshkosh ("Piece of Grass") for (most of) the last 6 years is not likely to be available to us because EAA is moving the 24-hour generator area out to the middle of the field at Camp Scholler (I don't really want to camp in a truck stop), which is where people have always been able to find us (because we told them exactly where we'll be). But EAA has still not made maps available for the new Camp Scholler design and because it's unclear what the net effect of displacing tenters (like me) from that area, I'm in no position to say where my camp area will end up at. A couple of alternative locations have fallen apart (it would appear the Van's dinner is the most likely spot for those who wish to socialize). A lot of people donated a lot of money to secure 6 camping sites for the event, and we won't be needing them, so a week or so ago -- because of the uncertainty -- I returned it via PayPayl (for those of you who submitted it via PayPal). For those of you who sent checks, I've simply shredded the checks and you should "void" them in your register. If you HAVEN'T received a refund, please contact me ASAP. Thanks.


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:38:24 AM PST US
    Subject: Chainsaw Propeller Carving
    From: Helsper <nickhelsper@gmail.com>
    There is a propeller carving demo given at Oshkosh every year that shows how to carve a wooden propeller using all power tools (chainsaws and power sanders). Here are some pictures of the process, on my blog, if anyone is interested. http://nickhelsper.blogspot.com/p/propeller-carving-all-power-tool-method.html ~Nick Helsper


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:24:31 PM PST US
    From: HCRV6@comcast.net
    Subject: Re: some approx V speeds
    Ed, Thanks for that. Without giving it much thought (make that any thought) my reaction was, what does it matter what kind of prop? Obviously it does as s oon as one recognizes the effect of airspeed/RPM on HP with the fixed pitch props. My experience is consistent with your observation, at 120 MPH my Catto prop allows me to climb with any of my buddies with CS props. They always get a bit of a jump on me at takeoff but as soon as I accelerate to 120 to 130 I can catch up. Harry Crosby RV-6 N16CX, 695 hours ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ed Anderson" <eanderson@carolina.rr.com> Sent: Friday, June 4, 2010 4:41:21 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: RE: RV-List: some approx V speeds Harry, When I first did my airspeed checks with my fixed pitch prop RV-6A, I could n=99t get anywhere near the performance/airspeed figures that Van quo ted. It turns out his figures are for engines with a constant speed prop. My best climb speed Vy turns out to be 120 MPH IAS, considerably higher tha n the Van=99s figure. I=99m sure there is someone out there that can give you a more unders tandable explanation =93 but it goes something like this. Here is how I see it =93 with a constant speed prop, you can get more HP at slow airspeeds by making the pitch finer producing less load on the engine, which results in more RPM which results in more HP. When you are di scussing climb it=99s the EXTRA HP above that required to maintain le vel flight than causes you to climb. If you can increase your HP above that necessary for level flight, you can increase your climb rate at any airspe ed (well, just about).. With a fixed pitch prop, you have the maximum load on the prop and therefor e the engine at slower airspeeds during climb-out, that keeps the rpm lower and therefore HP down compared to a constant speed prop. Therefore, in ord er to get more climb you need to produce more HP, with a fixed pitch prop y ou do that by flying a higher airspeed unloading the prop and engine a bit thereby permitting more rpm and HP and higher climb rate. Ed Ed Anderson Rv-6A N494BW Rotary Powered Matthews, NC eanderson@carolina.rr.com http://www.andersonee.com http://www.dmack.net/mazda/index.html http://www.flyrotary.com/ http://members.cox.net/rogersda/rotary/configs.htm#N494BW http://www.rotaryaviation.com/Rotorhead%20Truth.htm From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matro nics.com] On Behalf Of HCRV6@comcast.net Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 4:09 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: some approx V speeds Please explain: Whether you have fixed pitch or constant speed prop makes a difference. Harry Crosby RV-6 N16CX, 693 hours http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List http://forums.matronics.com http ===================== ==


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:13:06 PM PST US
    From: Charlie England <ceengland@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Re: Fwd: List Introduction & Main spar falls off workbench
    Obviously, Van should have the final word. But I'll bet they tell you to clean up the edges of the crack & build on. It's hard to imagine that one rivet doing a lot to keep the plane in the air. Take a look at edge distances & see if you can add a rivet outboard (toward the corner), & one between the original outboard pair. Adding a doubler there looks like it would be difficult, with the gear weldment in that space. Charlie ________________________________ From: James S Clark IV <james.s.clark@comcast.net> Sent: Sat, June 5, 2010 3:56:56 PM Subject: RV-List: Fwd: List Introduction & Main spar falls off workbench Hello RV'ers, I've been lurking, reading, and building an RV7A slow build since 2007. I thought I'd introduce myself to the list prior to my first request for help! Well it took till getting the fuselage kit for the first major problem to strike: a comedy of errors, on which I would truly appreciate some advice: Assembling the main spar center section, I had just constructed and temp bolted the wood spacer blocks between the fore and aft main spars to check for fit. Things looked good and I left the center spar on the workbench for the night. Unfortunately, I left it on a piece of foam which gradually compressed and the spar fell off the table 3 feet to the concrete and linoleum floor! The first floor strike appeared to bend a corner of the spar web down 90 degrees on a 45 degree bias. This is on the forward left lower side of the front spar web (where the 7A gear leg will go through later) I just knew it was stressed and would crack bending it back and it did when bent about half way back. I stop drilled the crack #30 and bent it the rest of the way back flat. I then sanded and scotchbrited a smooth slot. My question is (and I will ask Vans): This is a small crack, but it is in a BAD place (1 inch to main spar bolts). Is my fix OK? Is there a better solution? This piece is matched to my left and right main wing spars and wings are 90% done. Is it impossible to get a new center section front spar? Looking at the drawings, I note: Both the forward bottom skin and the aft bottom skin overlap this lower spar web flange at the front spar (lots of skin thickness here). Are there no stresses on the corner of this web at this location? The landing gear leg on the 7A will require scalloping a bit of this flange away anyway, but that scallop area (approximated by red pen in picture) is closer to the second rivet hole than the first. I got excited when I saw this as I thought I might cut my error away anyway, but it looks like the scallop will miss the damaged area. Well so much for you all thinking highly of me on my first intro. I've been pretty careful so far and not many mistakes or drilled fingers, but boy is this a bummer. Could it have happened on a worse piece? Thoughts, comments, fixes, and good natured laughter are appreciated. Best regards, Jim Clark (Gainesville, VA) BTW, for some additional comedy: the bucking bar followed the spar off the table (in the same event) an put a nice dent in the center of the web to add insult to injury. This is not a show stopper though.


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:51:38 PM PST US
    From: "Ed Anderson" <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
    Subject: some approx V speeds
    Welcome, Harry. Yeah, I really thought I had a dog at first, because I couldn't match Van's performance numbers - just the wrong comparison in my case {:>). There are certainly benefits to having a C/S on take off - however, for cost and simplicity reasons, I have not regretted staying fixed pitch. I swing a 74x 88 Performance Wood Prop which takes all the right rudder I have in my 6A to keep it on our 35' wide runway, in fact until I hit around 40 mph, there is not sufficient rudder authority. Take off performance is great, but I still need to hit 120 MPH to get best rate of climb. Now if I had to fly up a mountain side after take off - I might sing a different tune {:>) ed Ed Anderson Rv-6A N494BW Rotary Powered Matthews, NC eanderson@carolina.rr.com <http://www.andersonee.com> http://www.andersonee.com <http://www.dmack.net/mazda/index.html> http://www.dmack.net/mazda/index.html http://www.flyrotary.com/ <http://members.cox.net/rogersda/rotary/configs.htm> http://members.cox.net/rogersda/rotary/configs.htm#N494BW http://www.rotaryaviation.com/Rotorhead%20Truth.htm <http://www.dmack.net/mazda/index.html> _____ From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of HCRV6@comcast.net Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2010 4:24 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: some approx V speeds Ed, Thanks for that. Without giving it much thought (make that any thought) my reaction was, what does it matter what kind of prop? Obviously it does as soon as one recognizes the effect of airspeed/RPM on HP with the fixed pitch props. My experience is consistent with your observation, at 120 MPH my Catto prop allows me to climb with any of my buddies with CS props. They always get a bit of a jump on me at takeoff but as soon as I accelerate to 120 to 130 I can catch up. Harry Crosby RV-6 N16CX, 695 hours ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ed Anderson" <eanderson@carolina.rr.com> Sent: Friday, June 4, 2010 4:41:21 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: RE: RV-List: some approx V speeds Harry, When I first did my airspeed checks with my fixed pitch prop RV-6A, I couldn't get anywhere near the performance/airspeed figures that Van quoted. It turns out his figures are for engines with a constant speed prop. My best climb speed Vy turns out to be 120 MPH IAS, considerably higher than the Van's figure. I'm sure there is someone out there that can give you a more understandable explanation - but it goes something like this. Here is how I see it - with a constant speed prop, you can get more HP at slow airspeeds by making the pitch finer producing less load on the engine, which results in more RPM which results in more HP. When you are discussing climb it's the EXTRA HP above that required to maintain level flight than causes you to climb. If you can increase your HP above that necessary for level flight, you can increase your climb rate at any airspeed (well, just about).. With a fixed pitch prop, you have the maximum load on the prop and therefore the engine at slower airspeeds during climb-out, that keeps the rpm lower and therefore HP down compared to a constant speed prop. Therefore, in order to get more climb you need to produce more HP, with a fixed pitch prop you do that by flying a higher airspeed unloading the prop and engine a bit thereby permitting more rpm and HP and higher climb rate. Ed Ed Anderson Rv-6A N494BW Rotary Powered Matthews, NC eanderson@carolina.rr.com <http://www.andersonee.com> http://www.andersonee.com <http://www.dmack.net/mazda/index.html> http://www.dmack.net/mazda/index.html http://www.flyrotary.com/ <http://members.cox.net/rogersda/rotary/configs.htm> http://members.cox.net/rogersda/rotary/configs.htm#N494BW http://www.rotaryaviation.com/Rotorhead%20Truth.htm <http://www.dmack.net/mazda/index.html> _____ From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of HCRV6@comcast.net Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 4:09 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: some approx V speeds Please explain: Whether you have fixed pitch or constant speed prop makes a difference. Harry Crosby RV-6 N16CX, 693 hours http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List http://forums.matronics.com http://www.matronics.com/contribution t="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:45:41 PM PST US
    From: "don wentz" <dasduck@comcast.net>
    Subject: KCDC
    Hey RVers, anyone in the vicinity of Cedar City UT? Have an RV-6 stranded there with electrical/battery issues. pls call 503-703 1724 thanks!


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:29:59 PM PST US
    Subject: engine serial number?
    From: thomas sargent <sarg314@gmail.com>
    I am filling out the forms to request an airworthiness inspection. Form 8130-12 asks for the engine model and serial number. Mine is an Aerosport Power rebuild. The Aerosport power data plate on the engine shows the serial number as 0240, which in retrospect (after I got back home) seems way too small to be a Lycoming serial number. Is that what they are asking for? Who is deemed to be the engine maker, Lycoming or Aerosport? I'm not aware of a Lycoming serial number anywhere on the engine, though I easily could have missed it. I didn't think to check the engine log book which is at the hangar. -- Tom Sargent, RV-6A, doing the paper work.




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv-list
  • Browse RV-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --