Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 09:05 AM - Re: 406MHz ELTs (Corey Crawford)
2. 09:06 AM - Re: 406MHz ELTs (William Greenley)
3. 09:12 AM - Re: 406MHz ELTs (Bill Boyd)
4. 09:45 AM - Re: 406MHz ELTs ()
5. 10:24 AM - Re: 406MHz ELTs (Mark Swaney)
6. 10:49 AM - Re: 406MHz ELTs (Marty Helller)
7. 11:28 AM - Re: 406MHz ELTs (Scott)
8. 11:28 AM - Re: 406MHz ELTs (Scott)
9. 08:57 PM - 320 vs 360 flywheel (DEAN PSIROPOULOS)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Unfortunately, the E-04 from ACK is not yet available - ACK is stuck in
certification red tape.
--
Corey Crawford
corey.crawford@gmail.com
RV-7A - Denver, CO
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:37 PM, <Vanremog@aol.com> wrote:
> Listers-
>
> With the recent announcement that the FCC will discourage the sale of the
> older 121.5MHz ELTs this August, I would be interested in conversing
> with those of you who have done the switch from the ACK E-01 to the E-04 in
> a flying aircraft with panel mounted GPS.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
> N1GV (RV-6A Flying 944TTAE Silicon Valley, CA)
> "Intelligence is displayed in two fundamental ways: understanding problems
> and solving problems." --G.E. Moore
>
> **
>
>
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
This is discussed in http://eaa.org/news/2010/2010-06-21_conflicting.asp .
My question is, does this mean that it is unlawful to broadcast in 121.5 by
the ELT. If so, are all the new 406 elts also now illegal since they all
from what I see broadcast on both 406 and 121.5? I could not find any that
only use 406.
Bill Greenley
From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Vanremog@aol.com
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 10:38 PM
Subject: Re: RV-List: 406MHz ELTs
Listers-
With the recent announcement that the FCC will discourage the sale of the
older 121.5MHz ELTs this August, I would be interested in conversing with
those of you who have done the switch from the ACK E-01 to the E-04 in a
flying aircraft with panel mounted GPS.
Thanks in advance.
N1GV (RV-6A Flying 944TTAE Silicon Valley, CA)
"Intelligence is displayed in two fundamental ways: understanding problems
and solving problems." --G.E. Moore
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
"Discourage the sale," - yeah. From what I read, it's more like "ban the
use of." The FAA is apparently OK with 121.5 ELT's remaining in use, but
the FCC plans to cite you if you activate one for any reason.
Typical big gov.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:37 PM, <Vanremog@aol.com> wrote:
> Listers-
>
> With the recent announcement that the FCC will discourage the sale of the
> older 121.5MHz ELTs this August, I would be interested in conversing
> with those of you who have done the switch from the ACK E-01 to the E-04 in
> a flying aircraft with panel mounted GPS.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
> N1GV (RV-6A Flying 944TTAE Silicon Valley, CA)
> "Intelligence is displayed in two fundamental ways: understanding problems
> and solving problems." --G.E. Moore
>
> *
>
> *
>
>
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Dang. My new ELT for my RV-9A was just delivered last week. Boat anchor,
"get a rope".
Smitty
----- Original Message -----
From: Corey Crawford
To: rv-list@matronics.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 10:20 AM
Subject: Re: RV-List: 406MHz ELTs
Unfortunately, the E-04 from ACK is not yet available - ACK is stuck
in certification red tape.
--
Corey Crawford
corey.crawford@gmail.com
RV-7A - Denver, CO
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:37 PM, <Vanremog@aol.com> wrote:
Listers-
With the recent announcement that the FCC will discourage the sale
of the older 121.5MHz ELTs this August, I would be interested in
conversing with those of you who have done the switch from the ACK E-01
to the E-04 in a flying aircraft with panel mounted GPS.
Thanks in advance.
N1GV (RV-6A Flying 944TTAE Silicon Valley, CA)
"Intelligence is displayed in two fundamental ways: understanding
problems and solving problems." --G.E. Moore
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
This is what the Aircraft Spruce catalog says about the ACK E-04 ELT:=0AUn
dergoing certification testing, ACK is not accepting orders for the E-04 u
ntil ELT certification process is complete.-ACK 406/121.5 MHz E-04 ELTAC
K 406/121.5 MHz E-04 ELTACK 406/121.5 MHz E-04 ELT
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Before taking any action=3B wait for more accurate news. The news clip we'
re seeing says=2C 'FCC will discourage the sale' not=2C 'must replace.' Y
ou might be one of the last buyers of the technology=2C as am I.
The issue isn't about saving lifes=3B it's about rescue workers responding
to false alarms.....
Marty Heller
RV-7=2C Wiring
From: smitty@smittysrv.com
Subject: Re: RV-List: 406MHz ELTs
Dang. My new ELT for my RV-9A was just delivered last week. Boat anchor=2C
"get a rope".
Smitty
----- Original Message -----
From: Corey Crawford
Sent: Tuesday=2C June 22=2C 2010 10:20 AM
Subject: Re: RV-List: 406MHz ELTs
Unfortunately=2C the E-04 from ACK is not yet available - ACK is stuck in c
ertification red tape.
--
Corey Crawford
corey.crawford@gmail.com
RV-7A - Denver=2C CO
On Mon=2C Jun 21=2C 2010 at 8:37 PM=2C <Vanremog@aol.com> wrote:
Listers-
With the recent announcement that the FCC will discourage the sale of the o
lder 121.5MHz ELTs this August=2C I would be interested in conversing with
those of you who have done the switch from the ACK E-01 to the E-04 in a fl
ying aircraft with panel mounted GPS.
Thanks in advance.
N1GV (RV-6A Flying 944TTAE Silicon Valley=2C CA)
"Intelligence is displayed in two fundamental ways: understanding problems
and solving problems." --G.E. Moore
href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List">http://www.matronics.co
m/Navigator?RV-List
href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c
_________________________________________________________________
The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with H
otmail.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multicalendar&ocid=
PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_5
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
If you're involved in an emergency and a 121.5 MHz ELT goes off, the FCC
would be hard pressed to fine you. As a ham operator, I can use ANY
radio or other means necessary to protect life, limb or property in an
EMERGENCY and that right should also be with every citizen....
FCC Regulations, Part 97 covers us hams:
*
97.403 Safety of life and protection of property.-
<http://www.arrl.org/part-97-amateur-radio#>
No provision of these rules prevents the use by an amateur station
of any means of radio communication at its disposal to provide
essential communication needs in connection with the immediate
safety of human life and immediate protection of property when
normal communication systems are not available.
Bill Boyd wrote:
> "Discourage the sale," - yeah. From what I read, it's more like "ban
> the use of." The FAA is apparently OK with 121.5 ELT's remaining in
> use, but the FCC plans to cite you if you activate one for any reason.
>
> Typical big gov.
>
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:37 PM, <Vanremog@aol.com
> <mailto:Vanremog@aol.com>> wrote:
>
> Listers-
>
> With the recent announcement that the FCC will discourage the sale
> of the older 121.5MHz ELTs this August, I would be interested in
> conversing with those of you who have done the switch from the ACK
> E-01 to the E-04 in a flying aircraft with panel mounted GPS.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
> N1GV (RV-6A Flying 944TTAE Silicon Valley, CA)
> "Intelligence is displayed in two fundamental ways: understanding
> problems and solving problems." --G.E. Moore
>
> *
>
> t="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List
> tp://forums.matronics.com
> _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
>
> *
>
>
> *
>
>
> *
--
Scott
http://corbenflyer.tripod.com/
Flying Corben Junior Ace - Building RV-4
Gotta Fly or Gonna Die
Message 8
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I still don't get it (and admittedly haven't done my homework)...how
will going to the 406 MHz ELTs prevent false alarms?
Scott
http://corbenflyer.tripod.com/
Flying Corben Junior Ace - Building RV-4
Gotta Fly or Gonna Die
Marty Helller wrote:
> Before taking any action; wait for more accurate news. The news clip
> we're seeing says, 'FCC will discourage the sale' not, 'must
> replace.' You might be one of the last buyers of the technology, as
> am I.
>
> The issue isn't about saving lifes; it's about rescue workers
> responding to false alarms.....
>
> Marty Heller
> RV-7, Wiring
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Message 9
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | 320 vs 360 flywheel |
Hi all:
Anyone know the answer to this question..the perimeter bolt holes (the
inch holes just under the ring gear, not the prop bolt holes) on the 0-360
flywheel vs those on an 0-320is there any difference? In other words, if I
lay an 0-320 flywheel on top of one for an 0-360 will the perimeter bolt
holes all line up? Need to know if my Landoll steel ring for 0-360 will
bolt onto 0-320 flywheel. Thanks for the help.
Dean Psiropoulos
RV-6A N197DM
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|