RV10-List Digest Archive

Thu 06/30/05


Total Messages Posted: 25



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:38 AM - Re: Van's Conduit In Wing (Tim Olson)
     2. 05:27 AM - Re: Tube Flaring technique (Gary Specketer)
     3. 05:42 AM - Re: Van's Conduit In Wing (wlucas@nc.rr.com)
     4. 07:20 AM - Re: Tube Flaring technique (Stein Bruch)
     5. 08:23 AM - Re: Van's Conduit In Wing (Eric Panning)
     6. 08:36 AM - Re: Van's Conduit In Wing (James Hein)
     7. 08:59 AM - Re: Van's Conduit In Wing (Dan Checkoway)
     8. 09:17 AM - Re: Aux fuel tanks? (Jesse Saint)
     9. 09:37 AM - Re: Van's Conduit In Wing (Scott Schmidt)
    10. 10:46 AM - Newbe!!!!! (Jim Wade)
    11. 11:04 AM - Re: Newbe!!!!! (James Hein)
    12. 11:48 AM - Found the source for deburr bits for Dremel (James Hein)
    13. 12:44 PM - Re: Newbe!!!!! (Brian Sponcil)
    14. 02:57 PM - Re: Aux fuel tanks? (Nikolaos Napoli)
    15. 03:12 PM - Re: Firewall Insualtion? (Byron Gillespie)
    16. 04:02 PM - Second Battery (Dick Gurley)
    17. 04:19 PM - Re: Second Battery (Condrey, Bob (US SSA))
    18. 04:26 PM - Re: Second Battery (McGANN, Ron)
    19. 07:56 PM - Re: Tank Sealant Quantity? (Rick)
    20. 08:00 PM - Re: Van's Conduit In Wing (Rick)
    21. 08:09 PM - Re: Second Battery (Condrey, Bob (US SSA))
    22. 08:18 PM - cancellation (Neville Murray)
    23. 09:01 PM - Re: Tube Flaring technique (DejaVu)
    24. 09:32 PM - Re: Second Battery (Marcus Cooper)
    25. 09:57 PM - Re: Second Battery (John W. Cox)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:38:22 AM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: Van's Conduit In Wing
    --> RV10-List message posted by: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com> I don't remember the exact measurement I drilled to, but I drilled to the outer measurement of the smaller diameter of the conduit (in the low spots) but then deburred it slightly larger because that was hard to pull. I didn't go all the way to the outer diameter of the conduit. By the time I got done, it wasn't too bad to pull, with 2 people. It was pretty close to that outer diameter, just not all the way there. Tim Olson -- RV-10 #170 Current project: Fuselage Eric Panning wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: Eric Panning <ericmpmail-rv10@yahoo.com> > > More conduit questions.... > > I've decided to use the van's conduit and picked up 50 > feet of it from them today. > > Looks like I need to drill the rib holes from the > current 5/8ths to 11/16ths for the smaller outer > radius of the corrigated conduit. The other option > would be to drill to the outer radius of the conduit > and then hold it in place somehow. > > Which is the preferred method? I'm guessing drill > 11/16ths, stuff it though and it will self lock. Is > this correct? > > Thanks! > > Eric >


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:27:38 AM PST US
    From: "Gary Specketer" <speckter@comcast.net>
    Subject: Tube Flaring technique
    Glad I could help. Hope you get some good stuff to replace it. Check some samples of the new batch before you pay for it. Gary -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of DejaVu Subject: Re: RV10-List: Tube Flaring technique I had a friend A&P mechanic come by the house tonight with his tool, which was the same as mine. He tried about a dozen times and everyone of his cracked also. He also tried to dip the tube in Alodine for about 15min to soften it some-no joy. He tried a couple more while taking note of the position of the crack. They all cracked about the same place along the tube. He also looked at the lip with a magnifying glass after only one turn and could detect the crack starting. Couldn't see any obvious defect to the tube. He concluded that it was a bad batch of tubing that I got. Anh #141 ----- Original Message ----- From: Gary <mailto:speckter@comcast.net> Specketer Subject: RE: RV10-List: Tube Flaring technique One of the tricks is to have fresh tubing. My Glasair kit had tubing that would not flair. I had to get replacement tubing. Cut a sample or two and bring them to a friend and have him try it. That will tell you if it is technique or tubing. Gary -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of DejaVu Subject: RV10-List: Tube Flaring technique What's the trick to good flares? I did fine for half of the tubes and then managed to crack every one. I tried to carefully cut with a tube cutter, a little at a time, make sure the ends are squared, deburred. I have one of those sliding block flaring tools (37deg). One fella in the archive mentioned leaving 5/16" of the tube protruding through the block and turn 7 half turns. Anh #141


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:42:32 AM PST US
    From: wlucas@nc.rr.com
    Subject: Re: Van's Conduit In Wing
    iPlanet-SMTP-Warning: Lines longer than SMTP allows found and truncated. DNA: do not archive Its-Bogus: do not forward to list - No Plain-Text Section --- MIME Errors - No Plain-Text Section Found --- A message with no text/plain MIME section was received. The entire body of the message was removed. Please resend the email using Plain Text formatting. HOTMAIL is notorious for only including an HTML section in their client's default configuration. If you're using HOTMAIL, please see your email application's settings and switch to a default mail option that uses "Plain Text". --- MIME Errors No Plain-Text Section Found ---


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:20:05 AM PST US
    d="scan'208,217"; a="1215136055:sNHT47703644"
    From: "Stein Bruch" <stein@steinair.com>
    Subject: Tube Flaring technique
    First, get a good flaring tool. The "sliding block" type ones will work just ok, but are by far inferior to the good "Rotoflare" type tools. You'll never get the consistently good flares like using a "rotoflare" or something similar. Yes, the good flaring tools are more expensive than the cheapos, but they usually work much better and they'll do it every time. You don't have to measure a certain amount of tubing to leave protrucing, because it has a stop built into it. You also don't have to "count turns", you just turn until it's done! Also, did anyone mention squirting the tube with a bit of LPS or WD-40 when flaring? It's common practice to lubricate the mandrel with something and usually assists in keeping cracks away. That being said, if you have bad tubing, nothing will help but a fresh batch of tubing! Just my 2 cents as usual. No need for everyone to buy one, split the cost among friends. They're only about $85.00, and it's money well spent. Cheers, Stein. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of linn walters Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 11:22 PM To: rv10-list@matronics.com Subject: Re: RV10-List: Tube Flaring technique DejaVu wrote: I had a friend A&P mechanic come by the house tonight with his tool, which was the same as mine. He tried about a dozen times and everyone of his cracked also. He also tried to dip the tube in Alodine for about 15min to soften it some-no joy. That's because Alodine is a chromium conversion coating. If you leave it in for a really long time, Alodine will slowly eat the aluminum .... and it tkes a really long time. But, it won't corrode!!! Linn do not archive He tried a couple more while taking note of the position of the crack. They all cracked about the same place along the tube. He also looked at the lip with a magnifying glass after only one turn and could detect the crack starting. Couldn't see any obvious defect to the tube. He concluded that it was a bad batch of tubing that I got. Anh #141 ----- Original Message ----- From: Gary Specketer To: rv10-list@matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 8:46 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Tube Flaring technique One of the tricks is to have fresh tubing. My Glasair kit had tubing that would not flair. I had to get replacement tubing. Cut a sample or two and bring them to a friend and have him try it. That will tell you if it is technique or tubing. Gary -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of DejaVu Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 11:12 PM To: RV10 Subject: RV10-List: Tube Flaring technique What's the trick to good flares? I did fine for half of the tubes and then managed to crack every one. I tried to carefully cut with a tube cutter, a little at a time, make sure the ends are squared, deburred. I have one of those sliding block flaring tools (37deg). One fella in the archive mentioned leaving 5/16" of the tube protruding through the block and turn 7 half turns. Anh #141


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:23:39 AM PST US
    s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=PiB14DRH0aM0tktUijd+pz9pThd+GxFWmPJdsuUL7y1JzX5TfsmfMSFpH++KcZd4Q19k1HDaQ9DwnP2u5RN4pOqT9ZPka26ZC2TX52FKXD6ebKTLuFJXGirTpYe8AXb+EyHpPJjP6EhU3GbmKVSJ09uSEQ879HUCHrI9iDFhdd0= ;
    From: Eric Panning <ericmpmail-rv10@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Van's Conduit In Wing
    --> RV10-List message posted by: Eric Panning <ericmpmail-rv10@yahoo.com> Thanks for the quick reponses, I think I will follow Tim's input. I wish I had made up my mind prior to assembling the wings (except for the bottom skins) as it is a tight fit for some of the holes (+ the chips!) I built it to plans but it is a real tight fit through the stock bushings. I have strobe, AoA, autopilot harness, nav lighting, pitot heat and landing lights to run. Eric --- wlucas@nc.rr.com wrote: --------------------------------- --> RV10-List message posted by: wlucas@nc.rr.com I read on some RV construction sites where the conduit holes have been drilled out to the OD of the conduit. This makes it easy to pull the conduit through the holes in the ribs. Then, electrical cable zip ties are placed on each side of a rib, tighten to ensure a good grip on the conduit, and the excess snipped off. With a zip tie fastened to each side of the rib, that baby's not going anywhere. Just a thought! Wade ----- Original Message ----- From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Van's Conduit In Wing > --> RV10-List message posted by: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com> > > I don't remember the exact measurement I drilled to, but I > drilled to the outer measurement of the smaller diameter of > the conduit (in the low spots) but then deburred it slightly > larger because that was hard to pull. I didn't go all the way > to the outer diameter of the conduit. By the time I got done, > it wasn't too bad to pull, with 2 people. It was pretty close > to that outer diameter, just not all the way there. > > Tim Olson -- RV-10 #170 > Current project: Fuselage > > > Eric Panning wrote: > > --> RV10-List message posted by: Eric Panning <ericmpmail- > rv10@yahoo.com>> > > More conduit questions.... > > > > I've decided to use the van's conduit and picked up 50 > > feet of it from them today. > > >


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:36:17 AM PST US
    d="scan'208"; a="1058433111:sNHT15902246"
    From: James Hein <n8vim@arrl.net>
    Subject: Re: Van's Conduit In Wing
    --> RV10-List message posted by: James Hein <n8vim@arrl.net> I would be cautious about putting cable ties where you can't get to them later. In my experience, a cable tie outdoors does not last more than a few years; Indoors they may last 5 years or so. What happens is that they get brittle and just come apart in pieces. One more tip: Avoid the black ties anyplace where there can be sunlight. Even the "UV Stabilized" black ties seem to fail very quickly (on the order of a year or so.) -Jim 40384 wlucas@nc.rr.com wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: wlucas@nc.rr.com > > I read on some RV construction sites where the conduit holes have been > drilled out to the OD of the conduit. This makes it easy to pull the > conduit through the holes in the ribs. Then, electrical cable zip > ties are placed on each side of a rib, tighten to ensure a good grip > on the conduit, and the excess snipped off. With a zip tie fastened > to each side of the rib, that baby's not going anywhere. Just a thought! > > Wade > > *----- Original Message -----* > > *From*: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com> *Date*: Thursday, June 30, 2005 > 7:37 am *Subject*: Re: RV10-List: Van's Conduit In Wing > --> > RV10-List message posted by: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com> > > > > I don't remember the exact measurement I drilled to, but I > > drilled to the outer measurement of the smaller diameter of > > the conduit (in the low spots) but then deburred it slightly > > larger because that was hard to pull. I didn't go all the way > > to the outer diameter of the conduit. By the time I got done, > > it wasn't too bad to pull, with 2 people. It was pretty close > > to that outer diameter, just not all the way there. > > > > Tim Olson -- RV-10 #170 > > Current project: Fuselage > > > > > > Eric Panning wrote: > > > --> RV10-List message posted by: Eric Panning <ericmpmail- > > rv10@yahoo.com>> > > > More conduit questions.... > > > > > > I've decided to use the van's conduit and picked up 50 > > > feet of it from them today.


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:59:02 AM PST US
    From: "Dan Checkoway" <dan@rvproject.com>
    Subject: Re: Van's Conduit In Wing
    --> RV10-List message posted by: "Dan Checkoway" <dan@rvproject.com> Just use some RTV (or proseal). do not archive )_( Dan RV-7 N714D http://www.rvproject.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Hein" <n8vim@arrl.net> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Van's Conduit In Wing > --> RV10-List message posted by: James Hein <n8vim@arrl.net> > > I would be cautious about putting cable ties where you can't get to them > later. In my experience, a cable tie outdoors does not last more than a > few years; Indoors they may last 5 years or so. > > What happens is that they get brittle and just come apart in pieces. > > One more tip: Avoid the black ties anyplace where there can be sunlight. > Even the "UV Stabilized" black ties seem to fail very quickly (on the > order of a year or so.) > > -Jim 40384 > > wlucas@nc.rr.com wrote: > > > --> RV10-List message posted by: wlucas@nc.rr.com > > > > I read on some RV construction sites where the conduit holes have been > > drilled out to the OD of the conduit. This makes it easy to pull the > > conduit through the holes in the ribs. Then, electrical cable zip > > ties are placed on each side of a rib, tighten to ensure a good grip > > on the conduit, and the excess snipped off. With a zip tie fastened > > to each side of the rib, that baby's not going anywhere. Just a thought! > > > > Wade > > > > *----- Original Message -----* > > > > *From*: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com> *Date*: Thursday, June 30, 2005 > > 7:37 am *Subject*: Re: RV10-List: Van's Conduit In Wing > --> > > RV10-List message posted by: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com> > > > > > > I don't remember the exact measurement I drilled to, but I > > > drilled to the outer measurement of the smaller diameter of > > > the conduit (in the low spots) but then deburred it slightly > > > larger because that was hard to pull. I didn't go all the way > > > to the outer diameter of the conduit. By the time I got done, > > > it wasn't too bad to pull, with 2 people. It was pretty close > > > to that outer diameter, just not all the way there. > > > > > > Tim Olson -- RV-10 #170 > > > Current project: Fuselage > > > > > > > > > Eric Panning wrote: > > > > --> RV10-List message posted by: Eric Panning <ericmpmail- > > > rv10@yahoo.com>> > > > > More conduit questions.... > > > > > > > > I've decided to use the van's conduit and picked up 50 > > > > feet of it from them today. > >


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:17:50 AM PST US
    From: "Jesse Saint" <jesse@itecusa.org>
    Subject: Aux fuel tanks?
    --> RV10-List message posted by: "Jesse Saint" <jesse@itecusa.org> Everything is statute, both speed and distance. Sorry for not including that. Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. jesse@itecusa.org www.itecusa.org W: 352-465-4545 C: 352-427-0285 F: 815-377-3694 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tim Olson Subject: Re: RV10-List: Aux fuel tanks? --> RV10-List message posted by: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com> Not to nit pick...really don't intend it that way, but... To Everyone....when you post speed specs, please add the extra keystrokes to specify either MPH or KTS. At least these I can assume are MPH, or you have a very large engine. I plan to deal exclusively in KTS, so my specs will be posted that way. Very cool about your 1,000 mile range.... Now, is that 1000 NM, or 1000 Statute. ;) Again, I calculate everything in Nautical. Tim Tim Olson -- RV-10 #170 Current project: Fuselage DO NOT ARCHIVE Jesse Saint wrote: > Grumpy, > > > > I am not going to argue the point with you, but I think probably the > only similarities between the RV-10 and the F-16 is that they both fly. > There are a lot of certified airplanes that are much more similar to the > RV-10 than the F-16 that have added tip tanks as an STC, without > restructuring the wing. These planes aren't pulling 8G's in an outside > loop, though, which may require a little more engineering. > > > > We have actually discovered that we can fly at 12,000 feet burning 9.5 > gal/hour and cruising at 178 without the wheel or gear fairings. Adding > those should take us up to about 190 at least (from the reports we have > read - namely Dan Checkoway). This will give us over 1,000 miles of > range with an hour of reserve. We have thought all along that we wanted > aux tanks, but just realized that we can probably get by without them. > Just food for thought. > > > > Jesse Saint > > I-TEC, Inc. > > jesse@itecusa.org <mailto:jesse@itecusa.org> > > www.itecusa.org <http://www.itecusa.org> > > W: 352-465-4545 > > C: 352-427-0285 > > F: 815-377-3694 > > > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of > *GenGrumpy@aol.com > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 28, 2005 8:18 PM > *To:* rv10-list@matronics.com > *Subject:* Re: RV10-List: Aux fuel tanks? > > > > Guys, I'm a newcomer to building the -10, but have years of flight test > experience in high performance aircraft. > > > > I would not - repeat not - add anything to the outboard section of the > wing that Van has not done structural analysis on to include flight tests. > > > > I specifically recall a problem with flight test of the F-16 and > outboard stores that nearly took the outboard section of the wing off. > > > > The structures guys said it would never happen (the torsional loads) > until we showed them on videotape. > > > > They then said "if you let that continue, it would probably rip the wing > off......" > > > > Just a thought from a guy who requires both the design engineer and > flight test folks to say "it's ok"...... > > > > grumpy > > > > In a message dated 6/28/2005 4:09:11 PM Central Standard Time, > gyoung@cs-sol.com writes: > > Having the weight at the end of the spar is typically a benefit to > the load distribution in flight. It can be a detriment to the > landing loads though. Case in point, my Navion tip tanks allow me to > increase my gross weight BUT only by the amount of fuel carried in > the tip tanks. We are also cautioned to land gently if the tips are > filled. It was likely a no-analysis item back when the STC was > approved. Bending loads are one thing but it will also change the > handling and fore-aft sloshing will affect CG and may impart > torsional loads to the wing. Look at Van's write-up on the wing > design and load testing before you think about modifying it. > > Regards, > Greg Young > > > ________________________________ > > > --> RV10-List message posted by: Darton Steve <sfdarton@yahoo.com> > > Having owned and flown a Cessna 310 for the last three > years and 500 hours I'm not concerned about stability > issues. C310 main tanks are the tip tanks, 50 gallons > per side, the aux tanks are in the wings only 15 > gallons per side. This is a very stable aircraft. My > question would be about adding the loading to the end > of the spar? > Steve 40212 Wings >


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:37:43 AM PST US
    Subject: Van's Conduit In Wing
    From: "Scott Schmidt" <sschmidt@ussynthetic.com>
    --> RV10-List message posted by: "Scott Schmidt" <sschmidt@ussynthetic.com> I used a 13/16" first but had a hard time pulling the conduit through. I then opened it up to 7/8" and that seemed to work much better. It is much easier to pull through but is not going to go anywhere. http://freedomflyers.com/forums/showthread.php?p=25#post25 Scott Schmidt Cell: 801-319-3094 sschmidt@ussynthetic.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Eric Panning Subject: Re: RV10-List: Van's Conduit In Wing --> RV10-List message posted by: Eric Panning <ericmpmail-rv10@yahoo.com> More conduit questions.... I've decided to use the van's conduit and picked up 50 feet of it from them today. Looks like I need to drill the rib holes from the current 5/8ths to 11/16ths for the smaller outer radius of the corrigated conduit. The other option would be to drill to the outer radius of the conduit and then hold it in place somehow. Which is the preferred method? I'm guessing drill 11/16ths, stuff it though and it will self lock. Is this correct? Thanks! Eric


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:46:53 AM PST US
    From: Jim Wade <jwadejr@direcway.com>
    Subject: Newbe!!!!!
    Just wanted to introduce Julie and I to you. We have been following your emails with great interest, but have never posted any of our own. We started our RV-10 empenage April 25th finished yesterday. Waiting for fuselage and wings end of July. Slow build. We have learned a lot just reading your posts thanks for all the info. We will have all glass panel, new lycoming, tip tanks, aero composite 2 blade prop. This is the first kit plane we have built. We have restored several antique aircraft. Working with all new parts is a dream!!!! Julie, my wife works right along with me everyday and couldn t get it done without her. Keep us the good work, you all are a great inspiration. Blue Skies Jim & Julie Wade 40383


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:04:42 AM PST US
    d="scan'208"; a="1215933271:sNHT16425648"
    From: James Hein <n8vim@arrl.net>
    Subject: Re: Newbe!!!!!
    --> RV10-List message posted by: James Hein <n8vim@arrl.net> Welcome neighbor! I'm just starting the Elevators, and am working totally alone so it appears you're way ahead of me now! What tip tanks are you going to use? -Jim 40384 Jim Wade wrote: > Just wanted to introduce Julie and I to you. We have been following > your emails with great interest, but have never posted any of our own. > We started our RV-10 empenage April 25th finished yesterday. Waiting > for fuselage and wings end of July. Slow build. We have learned a lot > just reading your posts, thanks for all the info. We will have all > glass panel, new lycoming, tip tanks, aero composite 2 blade prop. > This is the first kit plane we have built. We have restored several > antique aircraft. Working with all new parts is a dream!!!! Julie, my > wife works right along with me everyday and couldn't get it done > without her. Keep us the good work, you all are a great inspiration. > Blue Skies > Jim & Julie Wade > 40383 > > > >


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:48:10 AM PST US
    d="jpg'145?scan'145,208,217,145"; a="1190986271:sNHT44711868"
    From: James Hein <n8vim@arrl.net>
    Subject: Found the source for deburr bits for Dremel
    DNA: do not archive Its-Bogus: do not forward to list - No Plain-Text Section --- MIME Errors - No Plain-Text Section Found --- A message with no text/plain MIME section was received. The entire body of the message was removed. Please resend the email using Plain Text formatting. HOTMAIL is notorious for only including an HTML section in their client's default configuration. If you're using HOTMAIL, please see your email application's settings and switch to a default mail option that uses "Plain Text". --- MIME Errors No Plain-Text Section Found ---


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:44:45 PM PST US
    From: "Brian Sponcil" <bsponcil@belinblank.org>
    Subject: Re: Newbe!!!!!
    You claim to be a newbie yet you've already finished the empenage!! I JUST ordered my tail kit so I've got to be the newest RV10 builder (at least for the next day or two). Strangely I think my wife Christine is more pumped about the project than I am and I hate to admit it, but at this point she's a better riveter than I am. Oh well. I'm sure to get plenty of practice in the next month or two. Anyway, good luck and keep us posted on your progress.... -Brian Iowa City, IA ----- Original Message ----- From: Jim Wade To: rv10-list@matronics.com Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 12:45 PM Subject: RV10-List: Newbe!!!!! Just wanted to introduce Julie and I to you. We have been following your emails with great interest, but have never posted any of our own. We started our RV-10 empenage April 25th finished yesterday. Waiting for fuselage and wings end of July. Slow build. We have learned a lot just reading your posts, thanks for all the info. We will have all glass panel, new lycoming, tip tanks, aero composite 2 blade prop. This is the first kit plane we have built. We have restored several antique aircraft. Working with all new parts is a dream!!!! Julie, my wife works right along with me everyday and couldn't get it done without her. Keep us the good work, you all are a great inspiration. Blue Skies Jim & Julie Wade 40383


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:57:17 PM PST US
    s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=MiINP5gz2ruo1J4nscSDN55eKNeJkiYqzAxpdD1iip33aXUnpCsq054gCxJe0+OvyfLNEnNCgnQVNcW66uoX74/bVo+jdBftZ64C4II1JHZ7G6lRU/WtiXnIfv7EtG0V/rYYBxMWiuw8XmT0c2RlHXqZIjHli0uwL4dpGzHxj4w= ;
    From: Nikolaos Napoli <owl40188@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Aux fuel tanks?
    In general I agree with Grumpy. The idea that if you add weight to the outboard wing you will eventually have problems is a given. The only unknown is for a particular design at what point it occurs. I don't think any of the builders know this at this time and Van's might not have a good handle on it either. The problem is considerably more complex than one might envision, which is brought to light by the statement that what happened to the F16 wing was surprising to the engineers working on it. Once a few RV10s with mods accumulate some hours we will have a better idea of how strong the wing is and how much more load it can safely take if any. It is also not a matter of if the aircraft are similar or not. Its simply a matter of what the static and fatigue margins are, what the aeroelastic response of the wing is, how much the loads are increased and how the load distributions have changed. I would advise extreme caution during any deviation from what Van's intended. In most cases small changes work out okay because the margins are usually high but not always. We know of at least one RV8 crash where the wing broke. To my knowledge the cause has not been determined. In fact, I remember reading another case in the Rviator where one of the 2 seater RV's encountered flutter. Also keep in mind that as a general rule of thumb a 10% increase in load (stress) will halve the fatigue life. Developing a fatigue crack in the spar is usually not a good thing. I am not saying that adding the outboard tanks is a problem or not a problem. I simple suggesting that builders take any mods seriously. Also remember that Vans did not test the wing to failure. The structure was clearly straining during the test as evidenced by all the noise per the test report, and your wing might not be as strong as the one that was tested. The above is just my opinion, I know not all agree with it and thats ok. GenGrumpy@aol.com wrote: Jesse - not to argue a point either. The huge transients we saw were in 1g level flight, and were totally related to airspeed and weight in the outboard section of the wing as compared to inner weight (such as full inner tanks and full outer tanks????). I run the world's largest ground wind tunnel test facility (Arnold Air Force Base), so I've seen some very strange things happen when all of the engineers said that it would not happen. And you do not want to have this happen to you for the first time in actual flight (you'd rather that Van's guys prove it first). My thoughts for whatever they're worth. Grumpy - #40404 In a message dated 6/29/2005 4:39:47 PM Central Standard Time, jesse@itecusa.org writes: Grumpy, I am not going to argue the point with you, but I think probably the only similarities between the RV-10 and the F-16 is that they both fly. There are a lot of certified airplanes that are much more similar to the RV-10 than the F-16 that have added tip tanks as an STC, without restructuring the wing. These planes arent pulling 8Gs in an outside loop, though, which may require a little more engineering. We have actually discovered that we can fly at 12,000 feet burning 9.5 gal/hour and cruising at 178 without the wheel or gear fairings. Adding those should take us up to about 190 at least (from the reports we have read namely Dan Checkoway). This will give us over 1,000 miles of range with an hour of reserve. We have thought all along that we wanted aux tanks, but just realized that we can probably get by without them. Just food for thought. Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. jesse@itecusa.org http://www.itecusa.org/ W: 352-465-4545 C: 352-427-0285 F: 815-377-3694


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:12:47 PM PST US
    d="scan'208,217"; a="935913572:sNHT44822844"
    From: "Byron Gillespie" <bgill1@charter.net>
    Subject: Firewall Insualtion?
    Thanks for the reply; My interest is probably more for the insulation characteristics. I am in the South Georgia area and the heat can be nasty. Can't seem to get to altitude quick enough. Aircraft Spruce has something called "The Insulator" that looks interesting. May give it a try and see how it works. Has anyone else tried this material? Thanks, Byron Starting on the fuselage sides # 40253 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Randy DeBauw Subject: RE: RV10-List: Firewall Insualtion? I have not installed the firewall sound insulation yet. What is interesting is that a good friend of mine flew with me in 10 the other day and was astounded at how quite the 10 is without the insulation in place. He was sure it would be one of the first things that I would want to get done after the first flights. Now we said he wouldn't think you would even need it. I will be putting it in. The material I have is from Hi Tec foams. Randy _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Byron Gillespie Subject: RV10-List: Firewall Insualtion? What are any of you doing relative to firewall insulation? I have searched the archives and have found very little info. I am putting together an order to Aircraft Spruce and noticed that they have several different types. Thought that I would add it on to the floor insulation order. Just ordered my fuel pumps, etc from Vans yesterday. Just looking to those who have (and are) forged ahead for the usual guidance. Thanks, Byron More fuselage decisions - # 40253


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:02:40 PM PST US
    From: "Dick Gurley" <rngurley@mindspring.com>
    Subject: Second Battery
    I have searched the archives and not found an answer to the following questions. To those of you who are going to use a dual electrical system, where have you placed the second battery? What is the effect does the placement have on weight and balance. Thanks for you help Dick Gurley #40414


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:19:07 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Second Battery
    From: "Condrey, Bob (US SSA)" <bob.condrey@baesystems.com>
    --> RV10-List message posted by: "Condrey, Bob (US SSA)" <bob.condrey@baesystems.com> I modified the battery tray to accept a pair of PC-680s (17 AH each) instead of the stock single 25 AH battery. Adds a few pounds total weight but I opted for extra redundancy that will partially offset the ballast that the factory carries. Bob -------------------------- Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com <owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com> Subject: RV10-List: Second Battery I have searched the archives and not found an answer to the following questions. To those of you who are going to use a dual electrical system, where have you placed the second battery? What is the effect does the placement have on weight and balance. Thanks for you help Dick Gurley #40414


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:26:59 PM PST US
    From: "McGANN, Ron" <ron.mcgann@baesystems.com>
    Subject: Second Battery
    --> RV10-List message posted by: "McGANN, Ron" <ron.mcgann@baesystems.com> Hey Bob, Do you have any photos of your tray mod? cheers, Ron -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Condrey, Bob (US SSA) Subject: Re: RV10-List: Second Battery --> RV10-List message posted by: "Condrey, Bob (US SSA)" <bob.condrey@baesystems.com> I modified the battery tray to accept a pair of PC-680s (17 AH each) instead of the stock single 25 AH battery. Adds a few pounds total weight but I opted for extra redundancy that will partially offset the ballast that the factory carries. Bob -------------------------- Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com <owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com> Subject: RV10-List: Second Battery I have searched the archives and not found an answer to the following questions. To those of you who are going to use a dual electrical system, where have you placed the second battery? What is the effect does the placement have on weight and balance. Thanks for you help Dick Gurley #40414


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:56:49 PM PST US
    From: Rick <ricksked@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Tank Sealant Quantity?
    --> RV10-List message posted by: Rick <ricksked@earthlink.net> As a bonafide card carrying OSHA compliance officer I can give you several reasons to avoid BOTH of these chemicals. Anyone ever have a low grade headache for a few days after working on your tanks? If not you didn't get your head into the mix good enough, or you had an SCBA, organic masks provide a low level (read not much) of protection and over a period of two hours your polluted. Toulene makes wonderful explosions, MEK is less volatile due to a higher boiling point. Guys, get outside if possible. I finished hazardous materials refresher this week. Explained my low grade 5 day headache. (Tanks!!!!) I won't open the old aluminum dust explosion conversations again. If you have a pile of that dust around your grinder, ground yourself and carefully sweep it into the trash bin. DON'T use your shop vac...static electricity can work wonders to light off that stuff. Damn videos scare the crap outta ya!! Rick S. 40185 Wings (Almost done,...staring at the tips) waiting for the fuse.


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:00:52 PM PST US
    From: Rick <ricksked@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: Van's Conduit In Wing
    --> RV10-List message posted by: Rick <ricksked@earthlink.net> Eric, 7/8" worked perfect for me...remember you need to allow the ribs to move when doing the bottom skins. Try to get them at a perfect 90 to the spar prior to siliconing the conduit to the ribs. I applied silicone prior to clecoing the skins on and match drilling to make sure the conduit was straight and not to loose or tight prior to completing the bottom skins. Rick S. 40185 Tips


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:09:57 PM PST US
    Subject: Second Battery
    From: "Condrey, Bob (US SSA)" <bob.condrey@baesystems.com>
    Um9uLA0KIA0KUGljdHVyZXMgYXR0YWNoZWQuICBJIGFsc28ganVzdCBjaGVja2VkIHRoZSBzcGVj cyAtIHRoZSBDb25jb3JkZSBSRy0yNVhDIGlzIDI0IEFIIGFuZCB3ZWlnaHMgMjMuNSBsYnMuICBF YWNoIFBDLTY4MCBpcyAxNiBBSCBhbmQgd2VpZ2hzIDE0LjUgbGJzLiAgRGltZW5zaW9uYWxseSwg dGhlIGJhdHRlcnkgdHJheSBoYWQgdG8gYmUgd2lkZW5lZCBieSBhbiBpbmNoIG9yIHNvIGFuZCBt YWRlIHNoYWxsb3dlciBieSBhIGZyYWN0aW9uIG9mIGFuIGluY2guICBJIGNob3NlIHRvIHVzZSBz b21lIDMvNCIgLjA2MyBzdG9jayB0byBtb3VudCB0aGUgcGFpciBvZiBjb250YWN0b3JzIG9uIHVz aW5nIHRoZSBzdG9jayBudXRwbGF0ZXMgdG8gYXR0YWNoIHRvIHRoZSBiYXR0ZXJ5IHRyYXkuICBU cmF5IHdhcyB3aWRlbmVkIHdpdGggLjA2MyBzaGVldCBhbmQgYW5nbGUuDQogDQpCb2IgIzQwMTA1 DQogDQoNCgktLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLSANCglGcm9tOiBvd25lci1ydjEwLWxp c3Qtc2VydmVyQG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20gb24gYmVoYWxmIG9mIE1jR0FOTiwgUm9uIA0KCVNlbnQ6 IFRodSAwNi8zMC8yMDA1IDA2OjI2IFBNIA0KCVRvOiAncnYxMC1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20n IA0KCUNjOiANCglTdWJqZWN0OiBSRTogUlYxMC1MaXN0OiBTZWNvbmQgQmF0dGVyeQ0KCQ0KCQ0K DQoJLS0+IFJWMTAtTGlzdCBtZXNzYWdlIHBvc3RlZCBieTogIk1jR0FOTiwgUm9uIiA8cm9uLm1j Z2FubkBiYWVzeXN0ZW1zLmNvbT4gDQoNCglIZXkgQm9iLCANCg0KCURvIHlvdSBoYXZlIGFueSBw aG90b3Mgb2YgeW91ciB0cmF5IG1vZD8gDQoNCgljaGVlcnMsIA0KCVJvbiANCg0KCS0tLS0tT3Jp Z2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tIA0KCUZyb206IG93bmVyLXJ2MTAtbGlzdC1zZXJ2ZXJAbWF0cm9u aWNzLmNvbSANCglbbWFpbHRvOm93bmVyLXJ2MTAtbGlzdC1zZXJ2ZXJAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbV1P biBCZWhhbGYgT2YgQ29uZHJleSwgQm9iIA0KCShVUyBTU0EpIA0KCVNlbnQ6IEZyaWRheSwgMSBK dWx5IDIwMDUgODo1MCBBTSANCglUbzogUlYxMC1MaXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20gDQoJU3ViamVj dDogUmU6IFJWMTAtTGlzdDogU2Vjb25kIEJhdHRlcnkgDQoNCg0KCS0tPiBSVjEwLUxpc3QgbWVz c2FnZSBwb3N0ZWQgYnk6ICJDb25kcmV5LCBCb2IgKFVTIFNTQSkiIA0KCTxib2IuY29uZHJleUBi YWVzeXN0ZW1zLmNvbT4gDQoNCglJIG1vZGlmaWVkIHRoZSBiYXR0ZXJ5IHRyYXkgdG8gYWNjZXB0 IGEgcGFpciBvZiBQQy02ODBzICgxNyBBSCBlYWNoKSBpbnN0ZWFkIA0KCW9mIHRoZSBzdG9jayBz aW5nbGUgMjUgQUggYmF0dGVyeS4gIEFkZHMgYSBmZXcgcG91bmRzIHRvdGFsIHdlaWdodCBidXQg SSANCglvcHRlZCBmb3IgZXh0cmEgcmVkdW5kYW5jeSB0aGF0IHdpbGwgcGFydGlhbGx5IG9mZnNl dCB0aGUgYmFsbGFzdCB0aGF0IHRoZSANCglmYWN0b3J5IGNhcnJpZXMuIA0KDQoJQm9iIA0KCS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tIA0KCVNlbnQgZnJvbSBteSBCbGFja0JlcnJ5IFdpcmVs ZXNzIEhhbmRoZWxkIA0KDQoNCgktLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLSANCglGcm9tOiBv d25lci1ydjEwLWxpc3Qtc2VydmVyQG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20gDQoJPG93bmVyLXJ2MTAtbGlzdC1z ZXJ2ZXJAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbT4gDQoJVG86IHJ2MTAtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tIDxydjEw LWxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbT4gDQoJU2VudDogVGh1IEp1biAzMCAxNjowMToyNCAyMDA1IA0K CVN1YmplY3Q6IFJWMTAtTGlzdDogU2Vjb25kIEJhdHRlcnkgDQoNCglJIGhhdmUgc2VhcmNoZWQg dGhlIGFyY2hpdmVzIGFuZCBub3QgZm91bmQgYW4gYW5zd2VyIHRvIHRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcgDQoJ cXVlc3Rpb25zLiAgVG8gdGhvc2Ugb2YgeW91IHdobyBhcmUgZ29pbmcgdG8gdXNlIGEgZHVhbCBl bGVjdHJpY2FsIHN5c3RlbSwgDQoJd2hlcmUgaGF2ZSB5b3UgcGxhY2VkIHRoZSBzZWNvbmQgYmF0 dGVyeT8gIFdoYXQgaXMgdGhlIGVmZmVjdCBkb2VzIHRoZSANCglwbGFjZW1lbnQgaGF2ZSBvbiB3 ZWlnaHQgYW5kIGJhbGFuY2UuIA0KDQoJDQoNCglUaGFua3MgZm9yIHlvdSBoZWxwIA0KDQoJDQoN CglEaWNrIEd1cmxleSANCg0KCSM0MDQxNCANCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCgkNCgkgIA0KCSAg DQoNCg0KDQoJXy09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0gDQoJXy09ICAgICAgICAgIC0gVGhlIFJWMTAtTGlzdCBFbWFpbCBGb3J1 bSAtIA0KCV8tPSBVc2UgdGhlIE1hdHJvbmljcyBMaXN0IEZlYXR1cmVzIE5hdmlnYXRvciB0byBi cm93c2UgDQoJXy09IHRoZSBtYW55IExpc3QgdXRpbGl0aWVzIHN1Y2ggYXMgdGhlIFN1YnNjcmlw dGlvbnMgcGFnZSwgDQoJXy09IEFyY2hpdmUgU2VhcmNoICYgRG93bmxvYWQsIDctRGF5IEJyb3dz ZSwgQ2hhdCwgRkFRLCANCglfLT0gUGhvdG9zaGFyZSwgYW5kIG11Y2ggbXVjaCBtb3JlOiANCglf LT0gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgDQoJXy09IC0t PiBodHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20vTmF2aWdhdG9yP1JWMTAtTGlzdCANCglfLT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PSAN Cg0KDQoNCgkNCgkgIA0KCSAgDQoNCg0K


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:18:09 PM PST US
    From: "Neville Murray" <alpinesr@onthenet.com.au>
    Subject: cancellation
    Please remove my email address from your list. Thank you for the information that you have provided. Regards Neville


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:01:39 PM PST US
    From: "DejaVu" <wvu@ameritel.net>
    Subject: Re: Tube Flaring technique
    Stein, Thanks for the help. I sent me findings to Scott Risan at Van's. He's sending me a replacement 12' roll of tubing. Anh ----- Original Message ----- From: Stein Bruch To: rv10-list@matronics.com Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 10:19 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Tube Flaring technique First, get a good flaring tool. The "sliding block" type ones will work just ok, but are by far inferior to the good "Rotoflare" type tools. You'll never get the consistently good flares like using a "rotoflare" or something similar. Yes, the good flaring tools are more expensive than the cheapos, but they usually work much better and they'll do it every time. You don't have to measure a certain amount of tubing to leave protrucing, because it has a stop built into it. You also don't have to "count turns", you just turn until it's done! Also, did anyone mention squirting the tube with a bit of LPS or WD-40 when flaring? It's common practice to lubricate the mandrel with something and usually assists in keeping cracks away. That being said, if you have bad tubing, nothing will help but a fresh batch of tubing! Just my 2 cents as usual. No need for everyone to buy one, split the cost among friends. They're only about $85.00, and it's money well spent. Cheers, Stein. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of linn walters Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 11:22 PM To: rv10-list@matronics.com Subject: Re: RV10-List: Tube Flaring technique DejaVu wrote: I had a friend A&P mechanic come by the house tonight with his tool, which was the same as mine. He tried about a dozen times and everyone of his cracked also. He also tried to dip the tube in Alodine for about 15min to soften it some-no joy. That's because Alodine is a chromium conversion coating. If you leave it in for a really long time, Alodine will slowly eat the aluminum .... and it tkes a really long time. But, it won't corrode!!! Linn do not archive He tried a couple more while taking note of the position of the crack. They all cracked about the same place along the tube. He also looked at the lip with a magnifying glass after only one turn and could detect the crack starting. Couldn't see any obvious defect to the tube. He concluded that it was a bad batch of tubing that I got. Anh #141 ----- Original Message ----- From: Gary Specketer To: rv10-list@matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 8:46 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Tube Flaring technique One of the tricks is to have fresh tubing. My Glasair kit had tubing that would not flair. I had to get replacement tubing. Cut a sample or two and bring them to a friend and have him try it. That will tell you if it is technique or tubing. Gary -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of DejaVu Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 11:12 PM To: RV10 Subject: RV10-List: Tube Flaring technique What's the trick to good flares? I did fine for half of the tubes and then managed to crack every one. I tried to carefully cut with a tube cutter, a little at a time, make sure the ends are squared, deburred. I have one of those sliding block flaring tools (37deg). One fella in the archive mentioned leaving 5/16" of the tube protruding through the block and turn 7 half turns. Anh #141


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:32:14 PM PST US
    From: "Marcus Cooper" <coop85@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Second Battery
    --> RV10-List message posted by: "Marcus Cooper" <coop85@bellsouth.net> The dual Odyssey batteries seem like a pretty slick idea. Anyone have any practical CG numbers that could see if there's any potential situation with too aft a CG with the extra 5.5lbs at the battery location? To further the question, I know there was a PDF file posted from the finishing kit weight & balance info but I can't find it in the archives. Could someone steer me in the right direction? Thanks, Marcus 40286 QB wings & finishing kit shipping next week -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Condrey, Bob (US SSA) Subject: Re: RV10-List: Second Battery --> RV10-List message posted by: "Condrey, Bob (US SSA)" <bob.condrey@baesystems.com> I modified the battery tray to accept a pair of PC-680s (17 AH each) instead of the stock single 25 AH battery. Adds a few pounds total weight but I opted for extra redundancy that will partially offset the ballast that the factory carries. Bob -------------------------- Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com <owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com> Subject: RV10-List: Second Battery I have searched the archives and not found an answer to the following questions. To those of you who are going to use a dual electrical system, where have you placed the second battery? What is the effect does the placement have on weight and balance. Thanks for you help Dick Gurley #40414


    Message 25


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:57:50 PM PST US
    Subject: Second Battery
    From: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox@pacificnw.com>
    --> RV10-List message posted by: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox@pacificnw.com> <http://www.myrv10.com/tips/index.html> Posted April 30th at 7:42PM from Tim's site. I have created a nifty excel sheet which allows unlimited manipulation of weights and balance changes. And I have requested Tim give me the datum arm to the rear tie down mount for that 70 pound jettisonable water bottle idea. That's 12147 inch pounds to relocate along the longitudinal somewhere. Shaking the bush. John _ KUAO -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Cooper Subject: RE: RV10-List: Second Battery --> RV10-List message posted by: "Marcus Cooper" <coop85@bellsouth.net> The dual Odyssey batteries seem like a pretty slick idea. Anyone have any practical CG numbers that could see if there's any potential situation with too aft a CG with the extra 5.5lbs at the battery location? To further the question, I know there was a PDF file posted from the finishing kit weight & balance info but I can't find it in the archives. Could someone steer me in the right direction? Thanks, Marcus 40286 QB wings & finishing kit shipping next week




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv10-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV10-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv10-list
  • Browse RV10-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --