Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:21 AM - Re: Re: St Nick (rob kermanj)
     2. 04:23 AM - Re: Garmin GTX-327 pricing (rob kermanj)
     3. 04:23 AM - Re: shipping costs (Wayne Edgerton)
     4. 05:40 AM - Re: shipping costs (Larry Rosen)
     5. 05:53 AM - Re: shipping costs (Jerry Grimmonpre)
     6. 06:23 AM - Vans Pricing Increase question (Jeff Dalton)
     7. 06:38 AM - Re: Did I ruin my skin??? (Schroeder, Bob (Parts Clerk))
     8. 07:38 AM - Re: Vans Pricing Increase question (Chris)
     9. 08:27 AM - Re: Vans Pricing Increase question (Condrey, Bob (US SSA))
    10. 09:28 AM - Re: Re: Andair Fuel Valve extension (Tim Olson)
    11. 10:04 AM - Re: shipping costs (Bruce Case)
    12. 10:25 AM - Re: Vans Pricing Increase question (Bruce Case)
    13. 11:35 AM - Picking an Engine Monitor (John Testement)
    14. 11:49 AM - Re: shipping costs (Chuck Jensen)
    15. 11:55 AM - Re: shipping costs (owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com)
    16. 11:59 AM - Re: Picking an Engine Monitor (RV Builder (Michael Sausen))
    17. 12:18 PM - Re: shipping costs (Chuck Jensen)
    18. 12:22 PM - Re: Picking an Engine Monitor (Tim Dawson-Townsend)
    19. 12:22 PM - Re: Picking an Engine Monitor (Tim Olson)
    20. 12:42 PM - Re: Picking an Engine Monitor (John Jessen)
    21. 12:50 PM - Re: shipping costs (owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com)
    22. 01:02 PM - Re: Picking an Engine Monitor (RV Builder (Michael Sausen))
    23. 01:02 PM - Re: shipping costs (owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto)
    24. 01:19 PM - Re: Picking an Engine Monitor (John Jessen)
    25. 02:54 PM -  Re: Picking an Engine Monitor (LIKE2LOOP@aol.com)
    26. 03:17 PM - Re: shipping costs (Ed Mueller)
    27. 03:24 PM - Re: Did I ruin my skin??? (Doug Shenk)
    28. 03:28 PM - Re: Picking an Engine Monitor (John Testement)
    29. 03:39 PM - AF-2500 Chelton Interface (RobHickman@aol.com)
    30. 03:49 PM - Re: shipping costs (Dave)
    31. 04:08 PM - Re: Picking an Engine Monitor (Jesse Saint)
    32. 04:15 PM - Re: Did I ruin my skin??? (Jeff Carpenter)
    33. 04:15 PM - Edge Rolling (Albert Gardner)
    34. 04:49 PM - Re: shipping costs (Chuck Jensen)
    35. 07:23 PM - Re: Vans Pricing Increase question (rsipp@earthlink.net)
    36. 07:31 PM - Re: Picking an Engine Monitor (Tim Olson)
    37. 07:50 PM - Re: Picking an Engine Monitor (David McNeill)
    38. 08:14 PM - Re: Picking an Engine Monitor (John W. Cox)
    39. 08:23 PM - Happy Birthday (2 me) a year later (Tim Olson)
    40. 08:26 PM - Re: Picking an Engine Monitor (Tim Olson)
    41. 08:33 PM - Re: Happy Birthday (2 me) a year later (Tim Dawson-Townsend)
    42. 08:34 PM - Re: Picking an Engine Monitor (David McNeill)
    43. 08:38 PM - Re: Re: Picking an Engine Monitor (Tim Dawson-Townsend)
    44. 09:17 PM - Re: Picking an Engine Monitor (David McNeill)
    45. 09:37 PM - Re: Happy Birthday (2 me) a year later (Rene)
    46. 09:37 PM - Re: Happy Birthday (2 me) a year later (Tim Olson)
    47. 09:51 PM - Re: Happy Birthday (2 me) a year later (Tim Olson)
    48. 09:56 PM - Re: Happy Birthday (2 me) a year later (Tim Olson)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> RV10-List message posted by: rob kermanj <rv10es@earthlink.net>
      
      How long did it take to arrive.  I am waiting for mine.  Thanks.
      
      do not archive
      
      rob kermanj
      rv10es@earthlink.net
      
      
      On Dec 15, 2005, at 5:50 PM, David McNeill wrote:
      
      > --> RV10-List message posted by: "David McNeill" <dlm46007@cox.net>
      >
      > St. Nick arrived early rhis year. Just received the Hartzell prop.  
      > Opened the box and retrieved the paperwork; will inspect this weekend.
      >
      >
      > your generous support!
      >
      >
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Garmin GTX-327 pricing | 
      
      Contact http://www.starkavionics.com/products.htm.  He has the best  
      prices but he does not take credit cards.
      
      Do Not archive
      
      rob kermanj
      rv10es@earthlink.net
      
      
      On Dec 15, 2005, at 5:59 PM, RV Builder (Michael Sausen) wrote:
      
      > Anyone know offhand what you can get a Garmin GTX-327 transponder  
      > for new or used?  I have a chance to pick up a used for $1100 that  
      > is yellow tagged but I believe you can get a brand new one of about  
      > $1300.
      >
      > Michael Sausen
      > -10 #352 Mid Fuse Bulkheads
      > do not archive
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: shipping costs | 
      
      I received my QB Fuselage and Wings at the end of November in the Dallas area using
      Tony Partain. It cost me $2467. This price was about $500 cheaper than the
      price that Van's said it would cost me if they had shipped it. When I originally
      thought of using Tony there was a $1000 saving for a 10, the crating charge
      at Van's, but Tony said his fuel cost have gone up. Not having to mess with
      the uncrating and disposal was a plus for me.
      
      Wayne Edgerton
      RV10 -40336
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: shipping costs | 
      
      --> RV10-List message posted by: Larry Rosen <LarryRosen@comcast.net>
      
      Tony Partain charged me $2,758.00 for delivery of my QB Wings and 
      Fuselage to southern New Jersey back in July.
      
      Larry Rosen
      <http://lrosen.nerv10.com>
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: shipping costs | 
      
      How can Tony Partain be contacted (phone, email or business address)?  I have to
      ship a cowl from WA to IL ...
      Thanks
      
      Jerry Grimmonpre'
      RV8A
        ----- Original Message -----
        From: Wayne Edgerton
        To: rv10-list@matronics.com
        Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 6:23 AM
        Subject: Re: RV10-List: shipping costs
      
      
        I received my QB Fuselage and Wings at the end of November in the Dallas area
      using Tony Partain. It cost me $2467. This price was about $500 cheaper than
      the price that Van's said it would cost me if they had shipped it. When I originally
      thought of using Tony there was a $1000 saving for a 10, the crating charge
      at Van's, but Tony said his fuel cost have gone up. Not having to mess with
      the uncrating and disposal was a plus for me.
      
        Wayne Edgerton
        RV10 -40336
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Vans Pricing Increase question | 
      
      With Vans increasing prices on Jan 1st 3% will I get the 2005 price if I send them
      a check before 12/31?
      
      Is the price based on payment date or delivery date?
      
      Jeff
        ----- Original Message -----
        From: Conti, Rick
        To: rv10-list@matronics.com
        Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 6:26 PM
        Subject: RE: RV10-List: shipping costs
      
      
        The shipment was classified as containing plastic. According to trucking companies,
      that raises the price.
      
      
        Thank You
        Rick Conti
        office: 703-414-6141
           cell: 571-215-6134
      
      
        From: steve dinieri [mailto:capsteve@adelphia.net]
        Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 4:57 PM
        To: rv10-list@matronics.com
        Subject: Re: RV10-List: shipping costs
      
      
        i just recieved a shipping bill for my rv-10 fuse that was delivered in november.
      (there must have been a screw up in processing) but it seems much higher
      than i've paid for any other crate from vans in the past. What have you guys experienced
      as far as costs go??? they're trying to collect  890  bucks and telling
      me thats with vans discount. i know vans has a 60% discount with roadway
      express, which means the real retail price should be 1500 bucks or so. what say
      ye'?????(btw..destination was niagara falls,NY)
      
      
        steve dinieri
      
        n221rv
      
        n231rv
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Did I ruin my skin??? | 
      
      --> RV10-List message posted by: "Schroeder, Bob (Parts Clerk)" <BSchroeder@uta.cog.ut.us>
      
      That's ok, it meant a lot to me personally that AVERY TOOLS would stand
      up to help a guy in his hour of need. Well done!
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Mike
      Lauritsen - Work
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Did I ruin my skin???
      
      --> RV10-List message posted by: "Mike Lauritsen - Work"
      <mike@cleavelandtool.com>
      
      I am so sorry to the rest of the list I meant for this to go directly to
      Bill, but forgot to change the address.  How embarrassing, sorry...
      
      Mike
      
      Mike Lauritsen
      Cleaveland Aircraft Tool
      2225 First St. 
      Boone, Iowa 50036
      515-432-6794
      mike@cleavelandtool.com
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Mike
      Lauritsen -
      Work
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Did I ruin my skin???
      
      --> RV10-List message posted by: "Mike Lauritsen - Work"
      <mike@cleavelandtool.com>
      
      Bill,
      
      I am sorry that happened to your skin.  It really shows how good tools
      will
      make or break the finish of an aircraft.  I will give you our edge
      forming
      tool and make sure you understand how to use it in exchange for a
      "customer
      testimonial" the old skin, the old tool, and permission to use your
      photos.
      
      http://www5.mailordercentral.com/clevtool/prodinfo.asp?number=EF60
      
      Thanks,
      Mike
      
      Mike Lauritsen
      Cleaveland Aircraft Tool
      2225 First St. 
      Boone, Iowa 50036
      515-432-6794
      mike@cleavelandtool.com
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Larry Rosen
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Did I ruin my skin???
      
      --> RV10-List message posted by: Larry Rosen <LarryRosen@comcast.net>
      
      I think you will regret not getting new skins.  Even if the fix works 
      out you will always know about any imperfection.  Like another poster 
      said, in the grand scheme of things the new skins are not that
      expensive.
      
      I like Cleaveland's edge forming tool 
      <http://www5.mailordercentral.com/clevtool/products.asp?dept=56>.  It is
      
      not cheep at $39, but it is a quality tool that works well.
      
      Larry Rosen
      N205EN (reserved)
      <http://lrosen.nerv10.com>
      
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Vans Pricing Increase question | 
      
      The letter on their website says the policy has changed such that you will lock
      in the 2005 price if your order is sent in before 2006.
      -Chris Lucas
      #40072
      Waiting on slow build fuselage order confirmation.
      
      do not archive
        ----- Original Message -----
        From: Jeff Dalton
        To: rv10-list@matronics.com
        Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 9:22 AM
        Subject: RV10-List: Vans Pricing Increase question
      
      
        With Vans increasing prices on Jan 1st 3% will I get the 2005 price if I send
      them a check before 12/31?
      
        Is the price based on payment date or delivery date?
      
        Jeff
          ----- Original Message -----
          From: Conti, Rick
          To: rv10-list@matronics.com
          Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 6:26 PM
          Subject: RE: RV10-List: shipping costs
      
      
          The shipment was classified as containing plastic. According to trucking companies,
      that raises the price.
      
          
      
          Thank You
          Rick Conti
          office: 703-414-6141
             cell: 571-215-6134
      
      
          From: steve dinieri [mailto:capsteve@adelphia.net]
          Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 4:57 PM
          To: rv10-list@matronics.com
          Subject: Re: RV10-List: shipping costs
      
          
      
          i just recieved a shipping bill for my rv-10 fuse that was delivered in november.
      (there must have been a screw up in processing) but it seems much higher
      than i've paid for any other crate from vans in the past. What have you guys
      experienced as far as costs go??? they're trying to collect  890  bucks and telling
      me thats with vans discount. i know vans has a 60% discount with roadway
      express, which means the real retail price should be 1500 bucks or so. what
      say ye'?????(btw..destination was niagara falls,NY)
      
          
      
          steve dinieri
      
          n221rv
      
          n231rv
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Vans Pricing Increase question | 
      
      With the exception of engines and props.  In those cases the deposit
      does NOT lock in price.
      
      
      Bob #40105
      
      
        _____ 
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Chris
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Vans Pricing Increase question
      
      
      The letter on their website says the policy has changed such that you
      will lock in the 2005 price if your order is sent in before 2006.
      
      -Chris Lucas
      
      #40072
      
      Waiting on slow build fuselage order confirmation.
      
      
      do not archive
      
              ----- Original Message -----
      
              From: Jeff Dalton <mailto:jdalton77@comcast.net> 
      
              To: rv10-list@matronics.com
      
              Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 9:22 AM
      
              Subject: RV10-List: Vans Pricing Increase question
      
              
      
              With Vans increasing prices on Jan 1st 3% will I get the 2005
      price if I send them a check before 12/31?
      
              
      
              Is the price based on payment date or delivery date?
      
              
      
              Jeff
      
                      ----- Original Message -----
      
                      From: Conti, Rick <mailto:rick.conti@boeing.com> 
      
                      To: rv10-list@matronics.com
      
                      Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 6:26 PM
      
                      Subject: RE: RV10-List: shipping costs
      
                      
      
                      The shipment was classified as containing plastic.
      According to trucking companies, that raises the price.
      
                      
      
                      Thank You
                      Rick Conti
                      office: 703-414-6141
                         cell: 571-215-6134
      
              =09
        _____ 
      
      
                      From: steve dinieri [mailto:capsteve@adelphia.net]
                      Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 4:57 PM
                      To: rv10-list@matronics.com
                      Subject: Re: RV10-List: shipping costs
      
                      
      
                      i just recieved a shipping bill for my rv-10 fuse that
      was delivered in november. (there must have been a screw up in
      processing) but it seems much higher than i've paid for any other crate
      from vans in the past. What have you guys experienced as far as costs
      go??? they're trying to collect  890  bucks and telling me thats with
      vans discount. i know vans has a 60% discount with roadway express,
      which means the real retail price should be 1500 bucks or so. what say
      ye'?????(btw..destination was niagara falls,NY)
      
                      
      
                      steve dinieri
      
                      n221rv
      
                      n231rv
      
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: RE: Andair Fuel Valve extension | 
      
      --> RV10-List message posted by: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
      
      Darrin,
      
      Here's an oooold post of mine from before.
      Currently, I can add a couple more points, too:
      
      -----
      Good question.  Here's my answer:
      
      1) The standard valve is very ugly
      2) The andair valve has that engraved plate with left/right labeling
           whereas you have to stick or paint on labels with the other.
      3) The andair valve has a more positive detent feel for when you get
           to the left or right position.
      4) The andair valve has an OFF position that you can't get to by
           just twisting the valve...you couldn't do it by accident.
           I'll be flying with kids on 95% of my flights, and they
           like to climb around and trade seats.
      5) It's not really a retrofit difficulty...you have to build the
           whole fuel line system anyway.  The convolution is in the
           STANDARD valve...you have to cross the fuel lines so the
           Left line feeds the RIGH side of the valve, and vice versa.
           This is an incredibly screwed up situation, which has already
           led to one other builder mounting hsi standard valve backwards
           just to make the convoluted routing simpler.  The Andair valve
           is a much more straightforward and logical plumbing job.
      6) The plane is going to be > $150K....point #1 is just too much
           to bear when the andair looks so nice.  I'm not building a
           flying lawn tractor.
      
      ** New
      
      7) If you use the Andair valve with an extension to the handle,
          it may be much easier to make clearance for your rear heat
          SCAT tube to pass by that area...this is a real problem,
          that to my knowledge has only been successfully addressed by
          reducing the hose to 1.5".  In addition, having the hose
          packed in there makes it very vulnerable to being rubbed
          through by the rudder cable, and it will heat your fuel valve.
      
      8) With the Andair valve and extension, you'll have clearance
          from your rudder cables for the valve fittings.
      
      
      Latest news:  If my order came in today, I may have my new
      Andair valve, and my flex fuel hoses.  If so, I'll be shooting
      some photos this weekend.  If not, we're still a few days
      away.
      
      Tim Olson -- RV-10  #170
      
      
      Schawang, Darrin wrote:
      > What makes the Andair valve that much better than the one that comes 
      > with the kit from Van's?
      
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: shipping costs | 
      
      I have found that there is generally a horrendous charge for delivery to your home
      or business.  If you can pick it up at the shippers dock you can save quite
      a bit.  They wanted $175 to deliver my tail kit 2 miles.
      
      Bruce Case, #40446
        ----- Original Message -----
        From: Jesse Saint
        To: rv10-list@matronics.com
        Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 9:34 PM
        Subject: RE: RV10-List: shipping costs
      
      
        Shipping on our fuse to FL in October of '04 was $903, and to a business address.
      You can probably save something by picking it up at the dock.  It is a really
      big box, even though it doesn't weight that much.  I just got a quote, however,
      to ship the same crate to Ecuador, South America by air (including trucking
      to Miami, FL) and the price was around $1,320.  Would that be $903 for trucking
      and $417 for air, I think not.  Something is not right with Van's shipping
      company.  It is possible to get quotes, I imagine, from other shippers and
      have them pick it up at Van's.  If anybody is interested in being the first,
      please let us know how much you can save.  I imagine Van's would go for this.
      In fact, you could even just get quotes based on the weight, size and contents
      and compare them.  Better yet, get a quote from the same shipping company and
      see what the real discount is.  If Van's gets a 60% discount, then they are
      getting that off the "listed price", which nobody probably ever pays.  Maybe
      they give the average Joe a 30% discount and then truly give Van's only a 30%
      discount off what anybody would pay.
      
      
        Jesse Saint
      
        I-TEC, Inc.
      
        jesse@itecusa.org
      
        www.itecusa.org
      
        Fax: 815-377-3694
      
      
        I am in Ecuador until May, 2006.  If you have questions regarding I-TEC, please
      call the office at 352-465-4545.  If you would like to talk to me, please call
      me at 352-505-1899.  This number won't always be on, but it has voicemail
      that will get to me in Ecuador.
      
      
        From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of RV Builder (Michael Sausen)
        Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 5:29 PM
        To: rv10-list@matronics.com
        Subject: RE: RV10-List: shipping costs
      
      
        Sounds right.  Mine last week was $745 to a business address in Texas.  Residential
      is always about $50-$100 more.  Quite the screw job these freight companies
      have going.  It had a $120 fuel surcharge on it too.  This is the first time
      Van's shipped to me via Roadway.  The other times it was ABF and much cheaper
      but then again the fuse crate is huge to accommodate that canopy.
      
      
        Michael Sausen
      
        -10 #352 Mid Fuse Bulkheads
      
      
        From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of steve dinieri
        Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 3:57 PM
        To: rv10-list@matronics.com
        Subject: Re: RV10-List: shipping costs
      
        i just recieved a shipping bill for my rv-10 fuse that was delivered in november.
      (there must have been a screw up in processing) but it seems much higher
      than i've paid for any other crate from vans in the past. What have you guys experienced
      as far as costs go??? they're trying to collect  890  bucks and telling
      me thats with vans discount. i know vans has a 60% discount with roadway
      express, which means the real retail price should be 1500 bucks or so. what say
      ye'?????(btw..destination was niagara falls,NY)
      
      
        steve dinieri
      
        n221rv
      
        n231rv
      
Message 12
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Vans Pricing Increase question | 
      
      Price is based on order date.
      
      Bruce Case
      
        ----- Original Message -----
        From: Jeff Dalton
        To: rv10-list@matronics.com
        Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 8:22 AM
        Subject: RV10-List: Vans Pricing Increase question
      
      
        With Vans increasing prices on Jan 1st 3% will I get the 2005 price if I send
      them a check before 12/31?
      
        Is the price based on payment date or delivery date?
      
        Jeff
          ----- Original Message -----
          From: Conti, Rick
          To: rv10-list@matronics.com
          Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 6:26 PM
          Subject: RE: RV10-List: shipping costs
      
      
          The shipment was classified as containing plastic. According to trucking companies,
      that raises the price.
      
          
      
          Thank You
          Rick Conti
          office: 703-414-6141
             cell: 571-215-6134
      
      
          From: steve dinieri [mailto:capsteve@adelphia.net]
          Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 4:57 PM
          To: rv10-list@matronics.com
          Subject: Re: RV10-List: shipping costs
      
          
      
          i just recieved a shipping bill for my rv-10 fuse that was delivered in november.
      (there must have been a screw up in processing) but it seems much higher
      than i've paid for any other crate from vans in the past. What have you guys
      experienced as far as costs go??? they're trying to collect  890  bucks and telling
      me thats with vans discount. i know vans has a 60% discount with roadway
      express, which means the real retail price should be 1500 bucks or so. what
      say ye'?????(btw..destination was niagara falls,NY)
      
          
      
          steve dinieri
      
          n221rv
      
          n231rv
      
Message 13
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Picking an Engine Monitor | 
      
      I am in the process of selecting and engine monitor and would like any
      suggestions you have to offer. The options I am considering are:
      Advanced Flight Systems F2500
      Grand Rapids EIS600
      Dynon EMS D-10
      MVP-50
      
      I will have dual Cheltons and would like to display the engine data on the
      Chelton. I also like the idea of having electronic checklists and data
      recording.
      
      What experience do you have with any of these? What should I look for or
      avoid? Any experience interfacing with Chelton?
      
      
      John Testement
      jwt@roadmapscoaching.com
      40321
      Working on QB fuse
      
      
Message 14
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Find out from Van's what freight Classification it should have gone
      under, for example Class 80.  The freight classification is a multiplier
      for the weight and distance.  Thus, if the shipment should have been
      Class 80 and it shipped as Class 240, your freight will be 3 times as
      high.  Now, I doubt aircraft parts ship at 80, but this is what you need
      to confirm with Van's.  Then check weight to see if that's also correct.
      The freight companies are using the 'current situation' to jack up
      freight rates and then throw a fuel surcharge on top of it.  This is not
      pointed at Roadway Express particularly (we use them as well as a couple
      others), but they are all in the business of being 'creative' to enhance
      revenue.  So, check those things our and see where you are.
      
      Chuck Jensen
      Do Not Archive
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of steve dinieri
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: shipping costs
      
      i just recieved a shipping bill for my rv-10 fuse that was delivered in
      november. (there must have been a screw up in processing) but it seems
      much higher than i've paid for any other crate from vans in the past.
      What have you guys experienced as far as costs go??? they're trying to
      collect  890  bucks and telling me thats with vans discount. i know vans
      has a 60% discount with roadway express, which means the real retail
      price should be 1500 bucks or so. what say ye'?????(btw..destination was
      niagara falls,NY)
      
      steve dinieri
      n221rv
      n231rv
      
Message 15
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Of course, it would be even higher if it contained metal....uuummmm,
      that about covers it.
      
      Chuck Jensen
      Do Not Archive
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Conti, Rick
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: shipping costs
      
      The shipment was classified as containing plastic. According to trucking
      companies, that raises the price.
      
      Thank You
      Rick Conti
      office: 703-414-6141
         cell: 571-215-6134
      ________________________________
      
      From: steve dinieri [mailto:capsteve@adelphia.net]
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: shipping costs
      
      i just recieved a shipping bill for my rv-10 fuse that was delivered in
      november. (there must have been a screw up in processing) but it seems
      much higher than i've paid for any other crate from vans in the past.
      What have you guys experienced as far as costs go??? they're trying to
      collect  890  bucks and telling me thats with vans discount. i know vans
      has a 60% discount with roadway express, which means the real retail
      price should be 1500 bucks or so. what say ye'?????(btw..destination was
      niagara falls,NY)
      
      steve dinieri
      n221rv
      n231rv
      
Message 16
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Picking an Engine Monitor | 
      
      If you want it on the Chelton's, you really only have one choice for the moment.
      That being the Grand Rapids.  Although I believe at least one or two others
      are working towards interfacing.
      
      If you can wait until S&F I think you will have some additional options.
      
      Michael
      do not archive
      
      ________________________________
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Testement
      Subject: RV10-List: Picking an Engine Monitor
      
      
      I am in the process of selecting and engine monitor and would like any suggestions
      you have to offer. The options I am considering are:
      Advanced Flight Systems F2500
      Grand Rapids EIS600
      Dynon EMS D-10
      MVP-50
      
      I will have dual Cheltons and would like to display the engine data on the Chelton.
      I also like the idea of having electronic checklists and data recording.
      
      What experience do you have with any of these? What should I look for or avoid?
      Any experience interfacing with Chelton?
      
      
      John Testement
      jwt@roadmapscoaching.com
      40321
      Working on QB fuse
      
      
Message 17
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      The Classifications are covered in the NMFC (National Motor Freight
      Classification) book, which is about 4" thick.  The downside is its
      thickness; the upside is you have numerous 'possible' classifications
      the parts can fall into, which can sharply affect your freight rate
      because the Classification is a multiplier of the weight.  You can be
      assured, when this selection is left to the freight company, they well
      select the highest Classification.  On the other hand, you are entitled
      to select the lowest Classification that reasonably describes your
      shipped materials.
      
      Freight bills should be inspected with particular emphasis on
      Classification.  If it's incorrect, call the freight company and ask for
      a requote.  It's a hassle but several hundred dollars can be at stake.
      
      Finally, Classifications, and by extension the rates you pay, are based
      on the weight density.  Shipping a ton of feathers will cost a lot more
      than shipping a ton of lead...because you are taking up more truck
      space.  But within the description of feathers, there's duck features,
      chicken features, compressed feathers, white feathers, ad nauseum (just
      kidding, but only a little) and each will have a different
      Classification.  The onus is on you to select the most favorable
      Classification.  And, NEVER pay list price...much like flying for full
      fare on an airline. 
      
      Chuck Jensen
      Do Not Archive
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Lenhardt
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: shipping costs
      
      The rate is also based on the classification or category of the contents
      of the shipment.  It's different between being aircraft parts or
      assemblies or materials (ie. sheet aluminum).  I found this out getting
      my own quotes when considering having my QB wings and fuse delivered to
      Roanoke, VA.  At first I got a very low quote (sorry, don't have it
      anymore) and I inquired about the difference.  That's when I found out
      about the category rating.  Originally, I only gave the size and weight
      of the crates to a person that was not familiar with the origination
      address (Van's).  When I called back, the person, who knew Van's
      Aircraft, asked me about the contents and informed me about the change
      in rate.  I guess it may have to do with insurance or the value of the
      cargo (if it's expensive, you can afford to pay more?).
      
      I ended up saving money by using Tony Partain (Partain Transport
      Company) to deliver without Van's crating them.
      
      John Lenhardt
      #40262
              ----- Original Message -----
              From: Jesse Saint <mailto:jesse@itecusa.org> 
              To: rv10-list@matronics.com
              Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 10:34 PM
              Subject: RE: RV10-List: shipping costs
              
              Shipping on our fuse to FL in October of '04 was $903, and to a
      business address.  You can probably save something by picking it up at
      the dock.  It is a really big box, even though it doesn't weight that
      much.  I just got a quote, however, to ship the same crate to Ecuador,
      South America by air (including trucking to Miami, FL) and the price was
      around $1,320.  Would that be $903 for trucking and $417 for air, I
      think not.  Something is not right with Van's shipping company.  It is
      possible to get quotes, I imagine, from other shippers and have them
      pick it up at Van's.  If anybody is interested in being the first,
      please let us know how much you can save.  I imagine Van's would go for
      this.  In fact, you could even just get quotes based on the weight, size
      and contents and compare them.  Better yet, get a quote from the same
      shipping company and see what the real discount is.  If Van's gets a 60%
      discount, then they are getting that off the "listed price", which
      nobody probably ever pays.  Maybe they give the average Joe a 30%
      discount and then truly give Van's only a 30% discount off what anybody
      would pay.
              
              Jesse Saint
              I-TEC, Inc.
              jesse@itecusa.org
              www.itecusa.org
              Fax: 815-377-3694
              
              I am in Ecuador until May, 2006.  If you have questions
      regarding I-TEC, please call the office at 352-465-4545.  If you would
      like to talk to me, please call me at 352-505-1899.  This number won't
      always be on, but it has voicemail that will get to me in Ecuador.
      =09
      ________________________________
      
              From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of RV Builder
      (Michael Sausen)
              Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 5:29 PM
              To: rv10-list@matronics.com
              Subject: RE: RV10-List: shipping costs
              
              Sounds right.  Mine last week was $745 to a business address in
      Texas.  Residential is always about $50-$100 more.  Quite the screw job
      these freight companies have going.  It had a $120 fuel surcharge on it
      too.  This is the first time Van's shipped to me via Roadway.  The other
      times it was ABF and much cheaper but then again the fuse crate is huge
      to accommodate that canopy.
              
              Michael Sausen
              -10 #352 Mid Fuse Bulkheads
              
      =09
      ________________________________
      
              From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of steve dinieri
              Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 3:57 PM
              To: rv10-list@matronics.com
              Subject: Re: RV10-List: shipping costs
              i just recieved a shipping bill for my rv-10 fuse that was
      delivered in november. (there must have been a screw up in processing)
      but it seems much higher than i've paid for any other crate from vans in
      the past. What have you guys experienced as far as costs go??? they're
      trying to collect  890  bucks and telling me thats with vans discount. i
      know vans has a 60% discount with roadway express, which means the real
      retail price should be 1500 bucks or so. what say
      ye'?????(btw..destination was niagara falls,NY)
              
              steve dinieri
              n221rv
              n231rv
      
Message 18
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Picking an Engine Monitor | 
      
      EI is advertising Chelton interface for the MVP-50.  Nice unit, but $$
      
      Do not archive
      
      TDT
      
      ________________________________
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com on behalf of RV Builder (Michael Sausen)
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Picking an Engine Monitor
      
      
      If you want it on the Chelton's, you really only have one choice for the moment.
      That being the Grand Rapids.  Although I believe at least one or two others
      are working towards interfacing.
      
      If you can wait until S&F I think you will have some additional options.
      
      Michael
      do not archive
      
      ________________________________
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Testement
      Subject: RV10-List: Picking an Engine Monitor
      
      
      I am in the process of selecting and engine monitor and would like any suggestions
      you have to offer. The options I am considering are:
      Advanced Flight Systems F2500
      Grand Rapids EIS600
      Dynon EMS D-10
      MVP-50
      
      I will have dual Cheltons and would like to display the engine data on the Chelton.
      I also like the idea of having electronic checklists and data recording.
      
      What experience do you have with any of these? What should I look for or avoid?
      Any experience interfacing with Chelton?
      
      
      John Testement
      jwt@roadmapscoaching.com
      40321
      Working on QB fuse
      
      
Message 19
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Picking an Engine Monitor | 
      
      --> RV10-List message posted by: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
      
      The EIS6000 is the one that interfaces to the Chelton. It has
      software specific to that application on it.  I will be integrating
      mine over the next couple weeks.
      
      Rob, creator and designer of the AFS systems will also be interfacing
      with the Chelton.  At present, I have not heard that this has been
      completed, but Rob may be able to fill you in.  Other than those,
      if you're going with dual cheltons and want engine display on there,
      then I'd skip even looking further.
      
      
      Tim Olson -- RV-10  #40170
      DO NOT ARCHIVE
      
      
      John Testement wrote:
      > I am in the process of selecting and engine monitor and would like any 
      > suggestions you have to offer. The options I am considering are:
      > Advanced Flight Systems F2500
      > Grand Rapids EIS600
      > Dynon EMS D-10
      > MVP-50
      >  
      > I will have dual Cheltons and would like to display the engine data on 
      > the Chelton. I also like the idea of having electronic checklists and 
      > data recording.
      >  
      > What experience do you have with any of these? What should I look for or 
      > avoid? Any experience interfacing with Chelton?
      >  
      > 
      > John Testement
      > jwt@roadmapscoaching.com <mailto:jwt@roadmapscoaching.com>
      > 40321
      > Working on QB fuse
      > 
      >  
      > 
      >  
      
      
Message 20
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Picking an Engine Monitor | 
      
      Rob Hickman, what say you?  Interfacing to the Chilton's?  
      
      John Jessen
        ~328  
      
      do not archive
      
        _____  
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of RV Builder
      (Michael Sausen)
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Picking an Engine Monitor
      
      
      If you want it on the Chelton's, you really only have one choice for the
      moment.  That being the Grand Rapids.  Although I believe at least one or
      two others are working towards interfacing.
      
      If you can wait until S&F I think you will have some additional options.
      
      Michael
      do not archive
      
        _____  
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Testement
      Subject: RV10-List: Picking an Engine Monitor
      
      
      I am in the process of selecting and engine monitor and would like any
      suggestions you have to offer. The options I am considering are:
      Advanced Flight Systems F2500
      Grand Rapids EIS600
      Dynon EMS D-10
      MVP-50
      
      I will have dual Cheltons and would like to display the engine data on the
      Chelton. I also like the idea of having electronic checklists and data
      recording.
      
      What experience do you have with any of these? What should I look for or
      avoid? Any experience interfacing with Chelton?
      
      
      John Testement
      jwt@roadmapscoaching.com
      40321
      Working on QB fuse
      
      
Message 21
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Chuck, Thank you for an important point to consider when having the
      product shipped.
      
      
      John - KUAO
      
      
      ________________________________
      
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Chuck Jensen
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: shipping costs
      
      
      The Classifications are covered in the NMFC (National Motor Freight
      Classification) book, which is about 4" thick.  The downside is its
      thickness; the upside is you have numerous 'possible' classifications
      the parts can fall into, which can sharply affect your freight rate
      because the Classification is a multiplier of the weight.  You can be
      assured, when this selection is left to the freight company, they well
      select the highest Classification.  On the other hand, you are entitled
      to select the lowest Classification that reasonably describes your
      shipped materials.
      
      
      Freight bills should be inspected with particular emphasis on
      Classification.  If it's incorrect, call the freight company and ask for
      a requote.  It's a hassle but several hundred dollars can be at stake.
      
      
      Finally, Classifications, and by extension the rates you pay, are based
      on the weight density.  Shipping a ton of feathers will cost a lot more
      than shipping a ton of lead...because you are taking up more truck
      space.  But within the description of feathers, there's duck features,
      chicken features, compressed feathers, white feathers, ad nauseum (just
      kidding, but only a little) and each will have a different
      Classification.  The onus is on you to select the most favorable
      Classification.  And, NEVER pay list price...much like flying for full
      fare on an airline. 
      
      
      Chuck Jensen
      
      Do Not Archive
      
      
Message 22
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Picking an Engine Monitor | 
      
      Ya, interfacing with any old farm equipment?   Ohhhhh, you meant Chelton.  Darn
      spell check.  :-D
      
      do not archive
      
      ________________________________
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Jessen
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Picking an Engine Monitor
      
      
      Rob Hickman, what say you?  Interfacing to the Chilton's? 
      
      John Jessen
        ~328 
      
      do not archive
      
      ________________________________
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of RV Builder (Michael Sausen)
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Picking an Engine Monitor
      
      
      If you want it on the Chelton's, you really only have one choice for the moment.
      That being the Grand Rapids.  Although I believe at least one or two others
      are working towards interfacing.
      
      If you can wait until S&F I think you will have some additional options.
      
      Michael
      do not archive
      
      ________________________________
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Testement
      Subject: RV10-List: Picking an Engine Monitor
      
      
      I am in the process of selecting and engine monitor and would like any suggestions
      you have to offer. The options I am considering are:
      Advanced Flight Systems F2500
      Grand Rapids EIS600
      Dynon EMS D-10
      MVP-50
      
      I will have dual Cheltons and would like to display the engine data on the Chelton.
      I also like the idea of having electronic checklists and data recording.
      
      What experience do you have with any of these? What should I look for or avoid?
      Any experience interfacing with Chelton?
      
      
      John Testement
      jwt@roadmapscoaching.com
      40321
      Working on QB fuse
      
      
Message 23
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Chuck,
      
        I just pulled my bill of lading from my fuse for last week.  It has a:
      
      NMFC15660004 CLC150
      
        Care to interpret for us as you seem to have the best understanding of the gibberish
      that invades our wallets.
      
      Michael
      do not archive
      
      ________________________________
      
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: shipping costs
      
      
      The Classifications are covered in the NMFC (National Motor Freight Classification)
      book, which is about 4" thick.  The downside is its thickness; the upside
      is you have numerous 'possible' classifications the parts can fall into, which
      can sharply affect your freight rate because the Classification is a multiplier
      of the weight.  You can be assured, when this selection is left to the freight
      company, they well select the highest Classification.  On the other hand,
      you are entitled to select the lowest Classification that reasonably describes
      your shipped materials.
      
      Freight bills should be inspected with particular emphasis on Classification. 
      If it's incorrect, call the freight company and ask for a requote.  It's a hassle
      but several hundred dollars can be at stake.
      
      Finally, Classifications, and by extension the rates you pay, are based on the
      weight density.  Shipping a ton of feathers will cost a lot more than shipping
      a ton of lead...because you are taking up more truck space.  But within the description
      of feathers, there's duck features, chicken features, compressed feathers,
      white feathers, ad nauseum (just kidding, but only a little) and each
      will have a different Classification.  The onus is on you to select the most favorable
      Classification.  And, NEVER pay list price...much like flying for full
      fare on an airline. 
      
      Chuck Jensen
      Do Not Archive
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Lenhardt
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: shipping costs
      
      The rate is also based on the classification or category of the contents of the
      shipment.  It's different between being aircraft parts or assemblies or materials
      (ie. sheet aluminum).  I found this out getting my own quotes when considering
      having my QB wings and fuse delivered to Roanoke, VA.  At first I got a
      very low quote (sorry, don't have it anymore) and I inquired about the difference.
      That's when I found out about the category rating.  Originally, I only gave
      the size and weight of the crates to a person that was not familiar with the
      origination address (Van's).  When I called back, the person, who knew Van's
      Aircraft, asked me about the contents and informed me about the change in rate.
      I guess it may have to do with insurance or the value of the cargo (if it's
      expensive, you can afford to pay more?).
      
      I ended up saving money by using Tony Partain (Partain Transport Company) to deliver
      without Van's crating them.
      
      John Lenhardt
      #40262
              ----- Original Message -----
              From: Jesse Saint <mailto:jesse@itecusa.org> 
              To: rv10-list@matronics.com
              Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 10:34 PM
              Subject: RE: RV10-List: shipping costs
              
              Shipping on our fuse to FL in October of '04 was $903, and to a business
      address.  You can probably save something by picking it up at the dock.  It
      is a really big box, even though it doesn't weight that much.  I just got a quote,
      however, to ship the same crate to Ecuador, South America by air (including
      trucking to Miami, FL) and the price was around $1,320.  Would that be $903
      for trucking and $417 for air, I think not.  Something is not right with Van's
      shipping company.  It is possible to get quotes, I imagine, from other shippers
      and have them pick it up at Van's.  If anybody is interested in being the
      first, please let us know how much you can save.  I imagine Van's would go for
      this.  In fact, you could even just get quotes based on the weight, size and
      contents and compare them.  Better yet, get a quote from the same shipping company
      and see what the real discount is.  If Van's gets a 60% discount, then they
      are getting that off the "listed price", which nobody probably ever pays. 
      Maybe they give the average Joe a 30% discount and then truly give Van's only
      a 30% discount off what anybody would pay.
              
              Jesse Saint
              I-TEC, Inc.
              jesse@itecusa.org
              www.itecusa.org
              Fax: 815-377-3694
              
              I am in Ecuador until May, 2006.  If you have questions regarding I-TEC,
      please call the office at 352-465-4545.  If you would like to talk to me, please
      call me at 352-505-1899.  This number won't always be on, but it has voicemail
      that will get to me in Ecuador.
      =09
      ________________________________
      
              From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of RV Builder (Michael Sausen)
              Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 5:29 PM
              To: rv10-list@matronics.com
              Subject: RE: RV10-List: shipping costs
              
              Sounds right.  Mine last week was $745 to a business address in Texas.
      Residential is always about $50-$100 more.  Quite the screw job these freight
      companies have going.  It had a $120 fuel surcharge on it too.  This is the first
      time Van's shipped to me via Roadway.  The other times it was ABF and much
      cheaper but then again the fuse crate is huge to accommodate that canopy.
              
              Michael Sausen
              -10 #352 Mid Fuse Bulkheads
              
      =09
      ________________________________
      
              From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of steve dinieri
              Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 3:57 PM
              To: rv10-list@matronics.com
              Subject: Re: RV10-List: shipping costs
              i just recieved a shipping bill for my rv-10 fuse that was delivered in
      november. (there must have been a screw up in processing) but it seems much higher
      than i've paid for any other crate from vans in the past. What have you
      guys experienced as far as costs go??? they're trying to collect  890  bucks and
      telling me thats with vans discount. i know vans has a 60% discount with roadway
      express, which means the real retail price should be 1500 bucks or so. what
      say ye'?????(btw..destination was niagara falls,NY)
              
              steve dinieri
              n221rv
              n231rv
      
Message 24
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Picking an Engine Monitor | 
      
      I did spell check and accepted the result without thinking.  My mistake.  
      
      do not archive
      
        _____  
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of RV Builder
      (Michael Sausen)
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Picking an Engine Monitor
      
      
      Ya, interfacing with any old farm equipment?   Ohhhhh, you meant Chelton.
      Darn spell check.  :-D
      
      do not archive
      
        _____  
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Jessen
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Picking an Engine Monitor
      
      
      Rob Hickman, what say you?  Interfacing to the Chilton's?  
      
      John Jessen
        ~328  
      
      do not archive
      
        _____  
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of RV Builder
      (Michael Sausen)
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Picking an Engine Monitor
      
      
      If you want it on the Chelton's, you really only have one choice for the
      moment.  That being the Grand Rapids.  Although I believe at least one or
      two others are working towards interfacing.
      
      If you can wait until S&F I think you will have some additional options.
      
      Michael
      do not archive
      
        _____  
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Testement
      Subject: RV10-List: Picking an Engine Monitor
      
      
      I am in the process of selecting and engine monitor and would like any
      suggestions you have to offer. The options I am considering are:
      Advanced Flight Systems F2500
      Grand Rapids EIS600
      Dynon EMS D-10
      MVP-50
      
      I will have dual Cheltons and would like to display the engine data on the
      Chelton. I also like the idea of having electronic checklists and data
      recording.
      
      What experience do you have with any of these? What should I look for or
      avoid? Any experience interfacing with Chelton?
      
      
      John Testement
      jwt@roadmapscoaching.com
      40321
      Working on QB fuse
      
      
Message 25
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Picking an Engine Monitor | 
      
      --> RV10-List message posted by: LIKE2LOOP@aol.com
      
         clear thingd for me...why would you want engine monitor display to share a 
      display?  wouldn't it be best to have it always up for visual scan?  am I 
      missing something???
      
      Do not archive.
      
      
      Steve    VS - completed
      
      Port St. Lucie, FL
      772-475-5556
      
      Sent from my Treo 600
      
      
Message 26
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> RV10-List message posted by: Ed Mueller <ed@muellerartcover.com>
      
      Anyone looked at ForwardAir  (www.forwardair.com)?  They ship from terminal to terminal only. You have to get the item to the terminal (they have one in Portland) and pick up at a terminal near you.  I used them once and they were very reasonable.  Question is, can we get the stuff moved from Aurora to Portland (around 33 miles) reasonably. 
      
      Ed Mueller
      
      On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:47:19 -0500, Chuck Jensen wrote:
      >Find out from Vans what freight Classification it should have gone
      >under, for example Class 80.The freight classification is a
      >multiplier for the weight and distance.Thus, if the shipment
      >should have been Class 80 and it shipped as Class 240, your freight
      >will be 3 times as high. Now, I doubt aircraft parts ship at 80,
      >but this is what you need to confirm with Vans.Then check weight
      >to see if thats also correct.The freight companies are using the
      >current situation to jack up freight rates and then throw a fuel
      >surcharge on top of it.This is not pointed at Roadway Express
      >particularly (we use them as well as a couple others), but they are
      >all in the business of being creative to enhance revenue.So,
      >check those things our and see where you are.
      >
      >Chuck Jensen
      >
      >Do Not Archive
      >
      >-----Original Message-----
      >From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-
      >server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of steve dinieri
      >Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 4:57 PM
      >To: rv10-list@matronics.com
      >Subject: Re: RV10-List: shipping costs
      >
      >i just recieved a shipping bill for my rv-10 fuse that was
      >delivered in november. (there must have been a screw up in
      >processing) but it seems much higher than i've paid for any other
      >crate from vans in the past. What have you guys experienced as far
      >as costs go??? they'retrying to collect 890bucks and telling me
      >thats with vans discount. i know vans has a 60% discount with
      >roadway express, which means the real retail price should be 1500
      >bucks or so. what say ye'?????(btw..destination was niagara
      >falls,NY)
      >
      >
      >steve dinieri
      >
      >n221rv
      >
      >n231rv
      
      
Message 27
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Did I ruin my skin??? | 
      
      --> RV10-List message posted by: Doug Shenk <dshenk3@bresnan.net>
      
      I'm building a 6a and found my learning curve on edge rolling was pretty 
      steep with the usual tools you have shown.
      My favorite tool is part no. EF60 at Cleveland Tools.  Based on a vise 
      grip handle and much
      easier to handle and adjust.
      Just a thought.
      Doug Shenk rv6aqb
      
      
      Tim Olson wrote:
      
      > --> RV10-List message posted by: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
      >
      > Bill,
      > Those first pictures made it look worse than the other pictures
      > did.  I think there's a good chance you're OK.
      >
      > Here's what I think.
      >
      > A) That roller tool isn't fantastic.   The Avery hockey puck one
      > is very similar, but fits in the palm of your hand and I think
      > that makes it easier to control.
      >
      > B) I think that you just didn't get a consistent, and sharp breaking
      > bend to the edge.  When you bend the edge, as far as I know, it isn't
      > a super smooth transition, but an actual straight-line bend that
      > angles the skin back maybe 10-15 degrees. It looks to me like you
      > kind of let it bend in some areas and not in others, and maybe tried
      > to keep the bend from creasing.   I'm not an expert, but in my own
      > opinion, which may be wrong, that bend should actually be a visible
      > crease in the skin.  The trick is just keeping it consistent.
      >
      > That said, I have a small...not as large as your clecoed pics,
      > bit of pillowing between my rivets....caused by rolling the edge
      > after it was dimpled.
      >
      > Anyway, I'd definitely have someone handy look at it to judge it
      > for you and show you how to do them, but it sure looks like you
      > can salvage that skin.
      >
      >
      > PS: regarding your proseal, get the quart can size. That's the
      > slower stuff and will be perfect for doing your tanks and
      > any other trailing edges, firewall sealants and heater box
      > sealing, and a few other chores.  If you haven't started
      > your tanks, and have the money to burn, I personally would
      > get 2 cans.
      >
      > Tim Olson -- RV-10  #40170
      > DO NOT ARCHIVE
      >
      >
      > Bill and Tami Britton wrote:
      >
      >> OOPS forgot to attach the pics.
      >>
      >>     ----- Original Message -----
      >>     *From:* Bill and Tami Britton <mailto:william@gbta.net>
      >>     *To:* rv10-list@matronics.com <mailto:rv10-list@matronics.com>
      >>     *Sent:* Thursday, December 15, 2005 10:08 AM
      >>     *Subject:* Re: RV10-List: Did I ruin my skin???
      >>
      >>     Here's the last set of pictures I'll post of this.  I clecoed the
      >>     skin to the AEX wedge and it flattened most of it out.  However, as
      >>     you can see in the pics there's still some waviness in the 
      >> middle.     Is it possible to get this out??  Another question is, if 
      >> I decide
      >>     to keep this skin does it need further edge rolling (more would
      >>     probably make it worse unless I could just use the seamers and put a
      >>     super small "bend" in it)?  Vans mentioned gluing it to the 
      >> wedge.     How would that affect it??
      >>          Now, I promise to lay this to rest.  I'll wait for a few 
      >> replies
      >>     then probably order the new skin!!!!!
      >>          Bill
      >>                    -----Original Message-----
      >>     *From:* owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      >>     <mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com>
      >>     [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Bill
      >>     and Tami Britton
      >>     *Sent:* Thursday, December 15, 2005 1:03 AM
      >>     *To:* RV10-list@matronics.com <mailto:RV10-list@matronics.com>
      >>     *Subject:* RV10-List: Did I ruin my skin???
      >>
      >>         
      >>         Tried rolling the trailing edge of the elevator skins tonight
      >>         and it doesn't look very good.  I haven't had much luck with
      >>         this edge rolling process yet in my building.  Anyway, I didn't
      >>         apply much pressure at all and the first skin, after a single
      >>         pass,  turned out wavy.  Check out the picture and let me know
      >>         what you think.  Tomorrow I'll try clecoing it to the trailing
      >>         edge wedge and see how it looks.
      >>
      >>         
      >>         Has anybody just skipped this step in their bulding???  I'm
      >>         wondering how big the gap would actually be if I just didn't
      >>         worry about rolling the edges on the elevator skins???  Just
      >>         curious.
      >>
      >>         
      >>         Bill
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >
      >
      
      
Message 28
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Picking an Engine Monitor | 
      
      --> RV10-List message posted by: "John Testement" <jwt@roadmapscoaching.com>
      
      Might be useful to bring the engine data to the pilot side screen (Chelton)
      periodically, especially if you are viewing one of the many other screens on
      the engine monitor itself (checklists, fuel management, setup, etc).
      Actually Tim has the best setup with 3 Cheltons - any information on any
      screen and a dedicated engine monitor.
      
      John Testement
      jwt@roadmapscoaching.com
      40321
      Working on QB fuse
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of LIKE2LOOP@aol.com
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Picking an Engine Monitor
      
      --> RV10-List message posted by: LIKE2LOOP@aol.com
      
         clear thingd for me...why would you want engine monitor display to share
      a display?  wouldn't it be best to have it always up for visual scan?  am I
      missing something???
      
      Do not archive.
      
      
      Steve    VS - completed
      
      Port St. Lucie, FL
      772-475-5556
      
      Sent from my Treo 600
      
      
Message 29
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | AF-2500 Chelton Interface | 
      
      We have finished the software interface for the AF-2500 to Chelton  System 
      and are currently testing it.  We have a number of orders for the  system and 
      should have them delivered in the next 4 weeks.
      
      
      Rob Hickman
      Advanced Flight Systems
      
Message 30
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Tony delivered my QB wings, Fuse and Finish kit to the Baltimore area for
      $3,000.  There is no crating charge from Vans on deliveries made bay Tony
      since they do not have to provide a crate.  This save a significant amount
      of money considering the regular shipping and crating charges for the QB
      kits.
      Dave Bope
        -----Original Message-----
        From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Robert G. Wright
        Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 9:13 PM
        To: rv10-list@matronics.com
        Subject: RE: RV10-List: shipping costs
      
      
        Using Tony Partain will be my method, too.  I won't know anything for sure
      until about February but I'll try to remember to post the Partain cost of
      trucking my crateless QB wings and fuse to Enterprise, AL.
      
      
        Rob Wright
      
        #392
      
      
      --
      
        From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Lenhardt
        Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 10:57 PM
        To: rv10-list@matronics.com
        Subject: Re: RV10-List: shipping costs
      
      
        The rate is also based on the classification or category of the contents
      of the shipment.  It's different between being aircraft parts or assemblies
      or materials (ie. sheet aluminum).  I found this out getting my own quotes
      when considering having my QB wings and fuse delivered to Roanoke, VA.  At
      first I got a very low quote (sorry, don't have it anymore) and I inquired
      about the difference.  That's when I found out about the category rating.
      Originally, I only gave the size and weight of the crates to a person that
      was not familiar with the origination address (Van's).  When I called back,
      the person, who knew Van's Aircraft, asked me about the contents and
      informed me about the change in rate.  I guess it may have to do with
      insurance or the value of the cargo (if it's expensive, you can afford to
      pay more?).
      
      
        I ended up saving money by using Tony Partain (Partain Transport Company)
      to deliver without Van's crating them.
      
      
        John Lenhardt
      
        #40262
      
          ----- Original Message -----
      
          From: Jesse Saint
      
          To: rv10-list@matronics.com
      
          Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 10:34 PM
      
          Subject: RE: RV10-List: shipping costs
      
      
          Shipping on our fuse to FL in October of '04 was $903, and to a business
      address.  You can probably save something by picking it up at the dock.  It
      is a really big box, even though it doesn't weight that much.  I just got a
      quote, however, to ship the same crate to Ecuador, South America by air
      (including trucking to Miami, FL) and the price was around $1,320.  Would
      that be $903 for trucking and $417 for air, I think not.  Something is not
      right with Van's shipping company.  It is possible to get quotes, I imagine,
      from other shippers and have them pick it up at Van's.  If anybody is
      interested in being the first, please let us know how much you can save.  I
      imagine Van's would go for this.  In fact, you could even just get quotes
      based on the weight, size and contents and compare them.  Better yet, get a
      quote from the same shipping company and see what the real discount is.  If
      Van's gets a 60% discount, then they are getting that off the "listed price"
      discount and then truly give Van's only a 30% discount off what anybody
      would pay.
      
      
          Jesse Saint
      
          I-TEC, Inc.
      
          jesse@itecusa.org
      
          www.itecusa.org
      
          Fax: 815-377-3694
      
      
          I am in Ecuador until May, 2006.  If you have questions regarding I-TEC,
      please call the office at 352-465-4545.  If you would like to talk to me,
      please call me at 352-505-1899.  This number won't always be on, but it has
      voicemail that will get to me in Ecuador.
      
      
          From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of RV Builder
      (Michael Sausen)
          Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 5:29 PM
          To: rv10-list@matronics.com
          Subject: RE: RV10-List: shipping costs
      
      
          Sounds right.  Mine last week was $745 to a business address in Texas.
      Residential is always about $50-$100 more.  Quite the screw job these
      freight companies have going.  It had a $120 fuel surcharge on it too.  This
      is the first time Van's shipped to me via Roadway.  The other times it was
      ABF and much cheaper but then again the fuse crate is huge to accommodate
      that canopy.
      
      
          Michael Sausen
      
          -10 #352 Mid Fuse Bulkheads
      
      
          From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of steve dinieri
          Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 3:57 PM
          To: rv10-list@matronics.com
          Subject: Re: RV10-List: shipping costs
      
          i just recieved a shipping bill for my rv-10 fuse that was delivered in
      november. (there must have been a screw up in processing) but it seems much
      higher than i've paid for any other crate from vans in the past. What have
      you guys experienced as far as costs go??? they're trying to collect  890
      bucks and telling me thats with vans discount. i know vans has a 60%
      discount with roadway express, which means the real retail price should be
      1500 bucks or so. what say ye'?????(btw..destination was niagara falls,NY)
      
      
          steve dinieri
      
          n221rv
      
          n231rv
      
Message 31
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Picking an Engine Monitor | 
      
      --> RV10-List message posted by: "Jesse Saint" <jesse@itecusa.org>
      
      I'm with you, Steve.
      
      Jesse Saint
      I-TEC, Inc.
      jesse@itecusa.org
      www.itecusa.org
      Fax: 815-377-3694
      
      I am in Ecuador until May, 2006.  If you have questions regarding I-TEC,
      please call the office at 352-465-4545.  If you would like to talk to me,
      please call me at 352-505-1899.  This number won't always be on, but it has
      voicemail that will get to me in Ecuador.
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of LIKE2LOOP@aol.com
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Picking an Engine Monitor
      
      --> RV10-List message posted by: LIKE2LOOP@aol.com
      
         clear thingd for me...why would you want engine monitor display to share
      a 
      display?  wouldn't it be best to have it always up for visual scan?  am I 
      missing something???
      
      Do not archive.
      
      
      Steve    VS - completed
      
      Port St. Lucie, FL
      772-475-5556
      
      Sent from my Treo 600
      
      
Message 32
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Did I ruin my skin??? | 
      
      --> RV10-List message posted by: Jeff Carpenter <jeff@westcottpress.com>
      
      It's funny how we all seem to have our individual hang ups.  For me,  
      bending the edges was a piece of cake.  I used a hand seamer to put a  
      little bend in the edge and worked my way down the length in  
      overlapping strokes.  The key here is to avoid overdoing it.  My  
      trailing edges are works of art.
      
      Now, you want to talk about trouble... I just replaced every bolt and  
      nyloc nut in the left wing after I discovered I had knocked the  
      torque wrench 5 in/lbs below zero before I started working...
      
      ... and don't even ask me about countersinking!
      
      Jeff Carpenter
      40304
      Wing Rear Spar
      
      
      On Dec 16, 2005, at 3:23 PM, Doug Shenk wrote:
      
      > --> RV10-List message posted by: Doug Shenk <dshenk3@bresnan.net>
      >
      > I'm building a 6a and found my learning curve on edge rolling was  
      > pretty steep with the usual tools you have shown.
      > My favorite tool is part no. EF60 at Cleveland Tools.  Based on a  
      > vise grip handle and much
      > easier to handle and adjust.
      > Just a thought.
      > Doug Shenk rv6aqb
      >
      >
      > Tim Olson wrote:
      >
      >> --> RV10-List message posted by: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
      >>
      >> Bill,
      >> Those first pictures made it look worse than the other pictures
      >> did.  I think there's a good chance you're OK.
      >>
      >> Here's what I think.
      >>
      >> A) That roller tool isn't fantastic.   The Avery hockey puck one
      >> is very similar, but fits in the palm of your hand and I think
      >> that makes it easier to control.
      >>
      >> B) I think that you just didn't get a consistent, and sharp breaking
      >> bend to the edge.  When you bend the edge, as far as I know, it isn't
      >> a super smooth transition, but an actual straight-line bend that
      >> angles the skin back maybe 10-15 degrees. It looks to me like you
      >> kind of let it bend in some areas and not in others, and maybe tried
      >> to keep the bend from creasing.   I'm not an expert, but in my own
      >> opinion, which may be wrong, that bend should actually be a visible
      >> crease in the skin.  The trick is just keeping it consistent.
      >>
      >> That said, I have a small...not as large as your clecoed pics,
      >> bit of pillowing between my rivets....caused by rolling the edge
      >> after it was dimpled.
      >>
      >> Anyway, I'd definitely have someone handy look at it to judge it
      >> for you and show you how to do them, but it sure looks like you
      >> can salvage that skin.
      >>
      >>
      >> PS: regarding your proseal, get the quart can size. That's the
      >> slower stuff and will be perfect for doing your tanks and
      >> any other trailing edges, firewall sealants and heater box
      >> sealing, and a few other chores.  If you haven't started
      >> your tanks, and have the money to burn, I personally would
      >> get 2 cans.
      >>
      >> Tim Olson -- RV-10  #40170
      >> DO NOT ARCHIVE
      >>
      >>
      >> Bill and Tami Britton wrote:
      >>
      >>> OOPS forgot to attach the pics.
      >>>
      >>>     ----- Original Message -----
      >>>     *From:* Bill and Tami Britton <mailto:william@gbta.net>
      >>>     *To:* rv10-list@matronics.com <mailto:rv10-list@matronics.com>
      >>>     *Sent:* Thursday, December 15, 2005 10:08 AM
      >>>     *Subject:* Re: RV10-List: Did I ruin my skin???
      >>>
      >>>     Here's the last set of pictures I'll post of this.  I clecoed  
      >>> the
      >>>     skin to the AEX wedge and it flattened most of it out.   
      >>> However, as
      >>>     you can see in the pics there's still some waviness in the  
      >>> middle.     Is it possible to get this out??  Another question  
      >>> is, if I decide
      >>>     to keep this skin does it need further edge rolling (more would
      >>>     probably make it worse unless I could just use the seamers  
      >>> and put a
      >>>     super small "bend" in it)?  Vans mentioned gluing it to the  
      >>> wedge.     How would that affect it??
      >>>          Now, I promise to lay this to rest.  I'll wait for a few  
      >>> replies
      >>>     then probably order the new skin!!!!!
      >>>          Bill
      >>>                    -----Original Message-----
      >>>     *From:* owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      >>>     <mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com>
      >>>     [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of  
      >>> *Bill
      >>>     and Tami Britton
      >>>     *Sent:* Thursday, December 15, 2005 1:03 AM
      >>>     *To:* RV10-list@matronics.com <mailto:RV10-list@matronics.com>
      >>>     *Subject:* RV10-List: Did I ruin my skin???
      >>>
      >>>                 Tried rolling the trailing edge of the elevator  
      >>> skins tonight
      >>>         and it doesn't look very good.  I haven't had much luck with
      >>>         this edge rolling process yet in my building.  Anyway, I  
      >>> didn't
      >>>         apply much pressure at all and the first skin, after a  
      >>> single
      >>>         pass,  turned out wavy.  Check out the picture and let me  
      >>> know
      >>>         what you think.  Tomorrow I'll try clecoing it to the  
      >>> trailing
      >>>         edge wedge and see how it looks.
      >>>
      >>>                 Has anybody just skipped this step in their  
      >>> bulding???  I'm
      >>>         wondering how big the gap would actually be if I just didn't
      >>>         worry about rolling the edges on the elevator skins???  Just
      >>>         curious.
      >>>
      >>>                 Bill
      >>>
      >>>
      >>> ----
      >>>
      >>>
      >>> ----
      >>>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >
      >
      
      
Message 33
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> RV10-List message posted by: "Albert Gardner" <ibspud@adelphia.net>
      
      
      Subject changed from 'Did I Ruin My Skin???'
      
      The amount of upset or roll depends on the part. On the leading edge of the
      rudder I put a great deal more because the rolled edge fits against a curved
      surface. The trailing edges and tank skins are rolled so they fit tight
      against the wedge and wing skins respectively.
      Albert Gardner        
      Yuma, AZ
      
      
Message 34
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Michael,
      
      Rather than interpreting, I will quote,
      
      "The charge for packages or pieces subject to a particular density group
      may be assessed on the basis of the next lower class provided in
      connection with the next heavier density group at the weight which would
      accrue from multiplying the cubage of such packages or pieces by the
      lowest density named in the density group which provides the next lower
      class.  In each such instance, that actual cube, actual weight, density
      group embracing the actual density, declared density and resultant
      weight for billing purposes (declared weight) of the pieces for which
      density is being declared must be shown by shipper on shipping orders
      and bills of lading at time of shipment."  
      
      And we thought the FAA wrote dense regulations!!!
      
      And, understand that was just sub-note 156608 which explains
      Classification 156600 Sub 4.  So, do I care to interpret?  Well, I would
      if I could, but I can't, so I won't.  However, I will suggest an
      alternative classification, that being 15660009, which is Class 70.
      Being Class 70 is 46% of Class 150, so it would cut your freight bill by
      64%...that's before your 'good guy' discount of 30%-50%.  Per the NMFC
      for Class 15660009, Note 13, I quote:
      
      "Plate or sheet (plastic) with formed interior cells, cavities or flutes
      may be shipped strapped on pallets or skids."
      
      Now, for a little lawyering; An aircraft hull for an RV is metal, but
      the carrier wants to kick it into a higher class because of the plastic
      canopy.  Since the plastic is construed by the carrier as the most
      restrictive rated piece, then you are entitled to ship by the
      appropriate Classification for that plastic component.  To wit, a canopy
      is most certainly plate, or sheet plastic that is formed with an
      interior cavity-that being where the pilot sticks his head.   
      
      All that stands between you and a refund is some nerve and a lot of
      patience.  However, the BEST way to avoid this problem is when YOU fill
      out the bill of lading (BOL), make sure you describe the components
      reasonably consistent with this description and mark "70" in the
      Classification box.  The carriers rating and invoice people will, 9 out
      of 10 times (that's 90% if you're calculating) will let it fly right on
      by.
      
      Chuck Jensen
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of RV Builder
      (Michael Sausen)
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: shipping costs
      
      Chuck,
      
        I just pulled my bill of lading from my fuse for last week.  It has a:
      
      NMFC15660004 CLC150
      
        Care to interpret for us as you seem to have the best understanding of
      the gibberish that invades our wallets.
      
      Michael
      do not archive
      
      ________________________________
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Chuck Jensen
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: shipping costs
      The Classifications are covered in the NMFC (National Motor Freight
      Classification) book, which is about 4" thick.  The downside is its
      thickness; the upside is you have numerous 'possible' classifications
      the parts can fall into, which can sharply affect your freight rate
      because the Classification is a multiplier of the weight.  You can be
      assured, when this selection is left to the freight company, they well
      select the highest Classification.  On the other hand, you are entitled
      to select the lowest Classification that reasonably describes your
      shipped materials.
      
      Freight bills should be inspected with particular emphasis on
      Classification.  If it's incorrect, call the freight company and ask for
      a requote.  It's a hassle but several hundred dollars can be at stake.
      
      Finally, Classifications, and by extension the rates you pay, are based
      on the weight density.  Shipping a ton of feathers will cost a lot more
      than shipping a ton of lead...because you are taking up more truck
      space.  But within the description of feathers, there's duck features,
      chicken features, compressed feathers, white feathers, ad nauseum (just
      kidding, but only a little) and each will have a different
      Classification.  The onus is on you to select the most favorable
      Classification.  And, NEVER pay list price...much like flying for full
      fare on an airline. 
      
      Chuck Jensen
      Do Not Archive
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Lenhardt
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: shipping costs
      
      The rate is also based on the classification or category of the contents
      of the shipment.  It's different between being aircraft parts or
      assemblies or materials (ie. sheet aluminum).  I found this out getting
      my own quotes when considering having my QB wings and fuse delivered to
      Roanoke, VA.  At first I got a very low quote (sorry, don't have it
      anymore) and I inquired about the difference.  That's when I found out
      about the category rating.  Originally, I only gave the size and weight
      of the crates to a person that was not familiar with the origination
      address (Van's).  When I called back, the person, who knew Van's
      Aircraft, asked me about the contents and informed me about the change
      in rate.  I guess it may have to do with insurance or the value of the
      cargo (if it's expensive, you can afford to pay more?).
      
      I ended up saving money by using Tony Partain (Partain Transport
      Company) to deliver without Van's crating them.
      
      John Lenhardt
      #40262
              ----- Original Message -----
              From: Jesse Saint <mailto:jesse@itecusa.org> 
              To: rv10-list@matronics.com
              Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 10:34 PM
              Subject: RE: RV10-List: shipping costs
              
              Shipping on our fuse to FL in October of '04 was $903, and to a
      business address.  You can probably save something by picking it up at
      the dock.  It is a really big box, even though it doesn't weight that
      much.  I just got a quote, however, to ship the same crate to Ecuador,
      South America by air (including trucking to Miami, FL) and the price was
      around $1,320.  Would that be $903 for trucking and $417 for air, I
      think not.  Something is not right with Van's shipping company.  It is
      possible to get quotes, I imagine, from other shippers and have them
      pick it up at Van's.  If anybody is interested in being the first,
      please let us know how much you can save.  I imagine Van's would go for
      this.  In fact, you could even just get quotes based on the weight, size
      and contents and compare them.  Better yet, get a quote from the same
      shipping company and see what the real discount is.  If Van's gets a 60%
      discount, then they are getting that off the "listed price", which
      nobody probably ever pays.  Maybe they give the average Joe a 30%
      discount and then truly give Van's only a 30% discount off what anybody
      would pay.
              
              Jesse Saint
              I-TEC, Inc.
              jesse@itecusa.org
              www.itecusa.org
              Fax: 815-377-3694
              
              I am in Ecuador until May, 2006.  If you have questions
      regarding I-TEC, please call the office at 352-465-4545.  If you would
      like to talk to me, please call me at 352-505-1899.  This number won't
      always be on, but it has voicemail that will get to me in Ecuador.
      =09
      ________________________________
      
              From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of RV Builder
      (Michael Sausen)
              Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 5:29 PM
              To: rv10-list@matronics.com
              Subject: RE: RV10-List: shipping costs
              
              Sounds right.  Mine last week was $745 to a business address in
      Texas.  Residential is always about $50-$100 more.  Quite the screw job
      these freight companies have going.  It had a $120 fuel surcharge on it
      too.  This is the first time Van's shipped to me via Roadway.  The other
      times it was ABF and much cheaper but then again the fuse crate is huge
      to accommodate that canopy.
              
              Michael Sausen
              -10 #352 Mid Fuse Bulkheads
              
      =09
      ________________________________
      
              From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of steve dinieri
              Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 3:57 PM
              To: rv10-list@matronics.com
              Subject: Re: RV10-List: shipping costs
              i just recieved a shipping bill for my rv-10 fuse that was
      delivered in november. (there must have been a screw up in processing)
      but it seems much higher than i've paid for any other crate from vans in
      the past. What have you guys experienced as far as costs go??? they're
      trying to collect  890  bucks and telling me thats with vans discount. i
      know vans has a 60% discount with roadway express, which means the real
      retail price should be 1500 bucks or so. what say
      ye'?????(btw..destination was niagara falls,NY)
              
              steve dinieri
              n221rv
              n231rv
      
Message 35
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Vans Pricing Increase question | 
      DNA: do not archive
      Its-Bogus: do not forward to list - No Plain-Text Section
      
      --- MIME Errors - No Plain-Text Section Found ---
      
        A message with no text/plain MIME section was received.
        The entire body of the message was removed.  Please
        resend the email using Plain Text formatting.
      
        HOTMAIL is notorious for only including an HTML section
        in their client's default configuration.  If you're using
        HOTMAIL, please see your email application's settings
        and switch to a default mail option that uses "Plain Text".
      
      --- MIME Errors No Plain-Text Section Found ---
      
      
Message 36
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Picking an Engine Monitor | 
      
      --> RV10-List message posted by: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
      
      I do see your point in a way, which is why on my panel I have 3 Chelton
      screens...so I still have the EFIS PFD display and the Map view whenever
      I want them.
      
      But...   If you have the GRT or Rob's device, and maybe the EI one too,
      remember that all of them have their own display, so you will also
      be able to have engine instrument displays available there, albeit
      smaller or less pretty.  In my case, with the EIS 6000, I still can
      have pages of engine data on the LCD display, and my favorite page
      running most of the time.  Also, if something goes out of spec,
      you'll get the warning light.
      
      So yes, I see your point, but I don't think it's as major an issue
      as you might think.  But, I do think it valid enough that I was
      willing to splurge for 3 screens and make the entire panel more
      useful or "comfortable".
      
      Now, John, to nitpick on your post...(the one that followed this one 
      that I'm replying to)   Please note that you cannot move the engine
      data to the pilot side screen if you are only using 2 chelton screens.
      The PFD (Primary display ... pilot side) is locked to the horizon
      display ONLY.   The 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Chelton screens can flip to
      any display.  That's another reason why I chose 3 screens. The
      center will be a map screen normally, but I'll have a stick switch
      that will flip the screen from map to engine.   The right side screen
      will also have a stick switch to flip it from map to engine to EFIS
      screen.
      
      When I let a co-pilot fly, they can have the Attitude screen, and we'll 
      leave the map in the middle or engine instruments as appropriate.
      
      Tim
      
      Tim Olson -- RV-10  #40170
      DO NOT ARCHIVE
      
      
      LIKE2LOOP@aol.com wrote:
      > --> RV10-List message posted by: LIKE2LOOP@aol.com
      > 
      >    clear thingd for me...why would you want engine monitor display to share a
      
      > display?  wouldn't it be best to have it always up for visual scan?  am I 
      > missing something???
      > 
      > Do not archive.
      > 
      > 
      > Steve    VS - completed
      > 
      > Port St. Lucie, FL
      > 772-475-5556
      > 
      > Sent from my Treo 600
      > 
      
      
Message 37
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Picking an Engine Monitor | 
      
      --> RV10-List message posted by: "David McNeill" <dlm46007@cox.net>
      
      One statement is incorrect; You may define the Chelton IDUs so that any IDU 
      will display any data including engine data. I have done it. Only the 
      certified version requires a dedicated PFD.
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "Tim Olson" <Tim@MyRV10.com>
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Picking an Engine Monitor
      
      
      > --> RV10-List message posted by: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
      >
      > I do see your point in a way, which is why on my panel I have 3 Chelton
      > screens...so I still have the EFIS PFD display and the Map view whenever
      > I want them.
      >
      > But...   If you have the GRT or Rob's device, and maybe the EI one too,
      > remember that all of them have their own display, so you will also
      > be able to have engine instrument displays available there, albeit
      > smaller or less pretty.  In my case, with the EIS 6000, I still can
      > have pages of engine data on the LCD display, and my favorite page
      > running most of the time.  Also, if something goes out of spec,
      > you'll get the warning light.
      >
      > So yes, I see your point, but I don't think it's as major an issue
      > as you might think.  But, I do think it valid enough that I was
      > willing to splurge for 3 screens and make the entire panel more
      > useful or "comfortable".
      >
      > Now, John, to nitpick on your post...(the one that followed this one that 
      > I'm replying to)   Please note that you cannot move the engine
      > data to the pilot side screen if you are only using 2 chelton screens.
      > The PFD (Primary display ... pilot side) is locked to the horizon
      > display ONLY.   The 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Chelton screens can flip to
      > any display.  That's another reason why I chose 3 screens. The
      > center will be a map screen normally, but I'll have a stick switch
      > that will flip the screen from map to engine.   The right side screen
      > will also have a stick switch to flip it from map to engine to EFIS
      > screen.
      >
      > When I let a co-pilot fly, they can have the Attitude screen, and we'll 
      > leave the map in the middle or engine instruments as appropriate.
      >
      > Tim
      >
      > Tim Olson -- RV-10  #40170
      > DO NOT ARCHIVE
      >
      >
      > LIKE2LOOP@aol.com wrote:
      >> --> RV10-List message posted by: LIKE2LOOP@aol.com
      >>
      >>    clear thingd for me...why would you want engine monitor display to 
      >> share a display?  wouldn't it be best to have it always up for visual 
      >> scan?  am I missing something???
      >>
      >> Do not archive.
      >>
      >>
      >> Steve    VS - completed
      >>
      >> Port St. Lucie, FL
      >> 772-475-5556
      >>
      >> Sent from my Treo 600
      >>
      >
      >
      > 
      
      
Message 38
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Picking an Engine Monitor | 
      
      --> RV10-List message posted by: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox@pacificnw.com>
      
      David, do tell the wiring or functional process you used that allowed
      the Chelton to release screen #1 from PFD and become a secondary engine
      annunciator (MFD) in that primary position.  I am most interested.
      
      I concur with #2, #3... #n will take any secondary function and display
      accordingly.  This would be an even stronger installation argument for
      the Chelton.  In the Lancair, N6XE, that I am familiar with, it would
      (should) not have done that.
      
      John Cox
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of David McNeill
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Picking an Engine Monitor
      
      
Message 39
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Happy Birthday (2 me)  a year later | 
      
      Some of you may remember that a year ago for my birthday, I got an RV-10
      hand carved model from my dad.  It was only one of 2 made by Griffin
      Aerospace Models.  You may also remember that right after OSH 2005 this
      summer, I sold off my highly prized posession to Dan Lloyd, because
      Griffin said the cost of a repaint was basically equal for me to
      the cost of having another one made...maybe a few more bucks to go
      custom, but oh well.
      
      Well today, just past that next birthday, I got my present in the mail
      again, but this time it is truly "MY" RV10.  Attached are some photos.
      I can highly recommend Griffin, as I believe Dan any myself would both
      tell you that the quality is extrordinary.  The only thing missing on
      mine is the antennas, which would be my fault since I didn't specify
      them, and the photos I sent didn't show the antennas.
      
      See below for the photos.  Here is Griffin's contact info:
      817-624-2320 or 866-584-0260
      Fax 817-624-0422
      
      Today, despite UPS not showing up with my fuel line stuff, I'm a very
      happy boy.
      
      To see a couple more pics, or if you get the digest version, here's a
      link: http://www.myrv10.com/N104CD/misc/index.html
      
      Tim
      -- 
      Tim Olson -- RV-10  #40170
      DO NOT ARCHIVE
      
Message 40
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Picking an Engine Monitor | 
      
      --> RV10-List message posted by: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
      
      Ahh, many thanks David.  I thought from our previous discussions
      that it was still a single-function device. Glad you got yours
      hooked up and it still flips.  I'm not sure if i'll let my left
      side flip or not, since there are 3, but if I do, I won't do it
      with remote buttons.
      
      Thanks for adding the 100% answer to that.  Sorry John if I misled
      you.  I'll be a little more reliable soon, as I'm currently
      wiring the panel ... slowly, as these darn manufacturers get my
      parts trickling in.  I'm at the stage where small parts not
      being on hand can slow you down, and every little piece can
      delay progress for a few days.
      
      Tim
      
      Tim Olson -- RV-10  #40170
      DO NOT ARCHIVE
      
      
      David McNeill wrote:
      > --> RV10-List message posted by: "David McNeill" <dlm46007@cox.net>
      > 
      > One statement is incorrect; You may define the Chelton IDUs so that any 
      > IDU will display any data including engine data. I have done it. Only 
      > the certified version requires a dedicated PFD.
      > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Olson" <Tim@MyRV10.com>
      > To: <rv10-list@matronics.com>
      > Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 8:31 PM
      > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Picking an Engine Monitor
      > 
      > 
      >> --> RV10-List message posted by: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
      >>
      >> I do see your point in a way, which is why on my panel I have 3 Chelton
      >> screens...so I still have the EFIS PFD display and the Map view whenever
      >> I want them.
      >>
      >> But...   If you have the GRT or Rob's device, and maybe the EI one too,
      >> remember that all of them have their own display, so you will also
      >> be able to have engine instrument displays available there, albeit
      >> smaller or less pretty.  In my case, with the EIS 6000, I still can
      >> have pages of engine data on the LCD display, and my favorite page
      >> running most of the time.  Also, if something goes out of spec,
      >> you'll get the warning light.
      >>
      >> So yes, I see your point, but I don't think it's as major an issue
      >> as you might think.  But, I do think it valid enough that I was
      >> willing to splurge for 3 screens and make the entire panel more
      >> useful or "comfortable".
      >>
      >> Now, John, to nitpick on your post...(the one that followed this one 
      >> that I'm replying to)   Please note that you cannot move the engine
      >> data to the pilot side screen if you are only using 2 chelton screens.
      >> The PFD (Primary display ... pilot side) is locked to the horizon
      >> display ONLY.   The 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Chelton screens can flip to
      >> any display.  That's another reason why I chose 3 screens. The
      >> center will be a map screen normally, but I'll have a stick switch
      >> that will flip the screen from map to engine.   The right side screen
      >> will also have a stick switch to flip it from map to engine to EFIS
      >> screen.
      >>
      >> When I let a co-pilot fly, they can have the Attitude screen, and 
      >> we'll leave the map in the middle or engine instruments as appropriate.
      >>
      >> Tim
      >>
      >> Tim Olson -- RV-10  #40170
      >> DO NOT ARCHIVE
      >>
      >>
      >> LIKE2LOOP@aol.com wrote:
      >>
      >>> --> RV10-List message posted by: LIKE2LOOP@aol.com
      >>>
      >>>    clear thingd for me...why would you want engine monitor display to 
      >>> share a display?  wouldn't it be best to have it always up for visual 
      >>> scan?  am I missing something???
      >>>
      >>> Do not archive.
      >>>
      >>>
      >>> Steve    VS - completed
      >>>
      >>> Port St. Lucie, FL
      >>> 772-475-5556
      >>>
      >>> Sent from my Treo 600
      >>>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      
      
Message 41
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Happy Birthday (2 me)  a year later | 
      
      Tim:
      
      Wieviel kostet es?
      
      TDT
      do not archive
      
      ________________________________
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com on behalf of Tim Olson
      Subject: RV10-List: Happy Birthday (2 me) a year later
      
      
      Some of you may remember that a year ago for my birthday, I got an RV-10
      hand carved model from my dad.  It was only one of 2 made by Griffin
      Aerospace Models.  You may also remember that right after OSH 2005 this
      summer, I sold off my highly prized posession to Dan Lloyd, because
      Griffin said the cost of a repaint was basically equal for me to
      the cost of having another one made...maybe a few more bucks to go
      custom, but oh well.
      
      Well today, just past that next birthday, I got my present in the mail
      again, but this time it is truly "MY" RV10.  Attached are some photos.
      I can highly recommend Griffin, as I believe Dan any myself would both
      tell you that the quality is extrordinary.  The only thing missing on
      mine is the antennas, which would be my fault since I didn't specify
      them, and the photos I sent didn't show the antennas.
      
      See below for the photos.  Here is Griffin's contact info:
      817-624-2320 or 866-584-0260
      Fax 817-624-0422
      
      Today, despite UPS not showing up with my fuel line stuff, I'm a very
      happy boy.
      
      To see a couple more pics, or if you get the digest version, here's a
      link: http://www.myrv10.com/N104CD/misc/index.html
      
      Tim
      --
      Tim Olson -- RV-10  #40170
      DO NOT ARCHIVE
      
      
Message 42
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Picking an Engine Monitor | 
      
      --> RV10-List message posted by: "David McNeill" <dlm46007@cox.net>
      
      One other thing may affect it, I have software version 6.20A2.
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox@pacificnw.com>
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Picking an Engine Monitor
      
      
      > --> RV10-List message posted by: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox@pacificnw.com>
      > 
      > David, do tell the wiring or functional process you used that allowed
      > the Chelton to release screen #1 from PFD and become a secondary engine
      > annunciator (MFD) in that primary position.  I am most interested.
      > 
      > I concur with #2, #3... #n will take any secondary function and display
      > accordingly.  This would be an even stronger installation argument for
      > the Chelton.  In the Lancair, N6XE, that I am familiar with, it would
      > (should) not have done that.
      > 
      > John Cox
      > 
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of David McNeill
      > Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 7:50 PM
      > To: rv10-list@matronics.com
      > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Picking an Engine Monitor
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      >
      
      
Message 43
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Picking an Engine Monitor | 
      
      FYI
      
      One goal for integrated electronic cockpits is to move to a "dark cockpit", i.e.
      it's a waste of time to stare at engine gauges that are all "normal".  Computers
      can do a much better job monitoring things than a human.  Therefore, displays
      can be "dark" or limited under normal circumstances, and only give you a
      face full of data when it's really important, for instance when an exceedance
      or significant trend is detected. 
      
      TDT
      
      
      ________________________________
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com on behalf of LIKE2LOOP@aol.com
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Picking an Engine Monitor
      
      
      --> RV10-List message posted by: LIKE2LOOP@aol.com
      
         clear thingd for me...why would you want engine monitor display to share a
      display?  wouldn't it be best to have it always up for visual scan?  am I
      missing something???
      
      Do not archive.
      
      
      Steve    VS - completed
      
      Port St. Lucie, FL
      772-475-5556
      
      Sent from my Treo 600
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 44
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Picking an Engine Monitor | 
      
      --> RV10-List message posted by: "David McNeill" <dlm46007@cox.net>
      
      Just got the following from Peter at D2A
      
      Yes you are correct.  If you want your system to look and act like a
      certified system you can name your #1 screen IDU1 and you will only have
      PFD functions on that display.  Naming the #1 display IDU0 you will have
      all multi-functions.
      
      Take Care,
      
      Peter Stiles
      Vice President
      Direct-To Avionics
      www.d2av.com
      peter@d2av.com
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: David McNeill [mailto:dlm46007@cox.net] 
      Subject: IDU definition
      
      Just a point of clarification. In the experimental version the IDUs can
      be 
      defined to display PFD, map or engine data on any IDU. Only the
      certified 
      version requires a dedicated PFD IDU and this is defined in the CPU 
      designation (0-4)? 
      
      
Message 45
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Happy Birthday (2 me)  a year later | 
      
      --> RV10-List message posted by: "Rene" <rene@felker.com>
      
      Tim, is the baggage door on the Right?  Is that where yours is?
      
      Do Not Archive
      
      Rene'
      801-721-6080
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tim Olson
      Subject: RV10-List: Happy Birthday (2 me) a year later
      
      Some of you may remember that a year ago for my birthday, I got an RV-10
      hand carved model from my dad.  It was only one of 2 made by Griffin
      Aerospace Models.  You may also remember that right after OSH 2005 this
      summer, I sold off my highly prized posession to Dan Lloyd, because
      Griffin said the cost of a repaint was basically equal for me to
      the cost of having another one made...maybe a few more bucks to go
      custom, but oh well.
      
      Well today, just past that next birthday, I got my present in the mail
      again, but this time it is truly "MY" RV10.  Attached are some photos.
      I can highly recommend Griffin, as I believe Dan any myself would both
      tell you that the quality is extrordinary.  The only thing missing on
      mine is the antennas, which would be my fault since I didn't specify
      them, and the photos I sent didn't show the antennas.
      
      See below for the photos.  Here is Griffin's contact info:
      817-624-2320 or 866-584-0260
      Fax 817-624-0422
      
      Today, despite UPS not showing up with my fuel line stuff, I'm a very
      happy boy.
      
      To see a couple more pics, or if you get the digest version, here's a
      link: http://www.myrv10.com/N104CD/misc/index.html
      
      Tim
      -- 
      Tim Olson -- RV-10  #40170
      DO NOT ARCHIVE
      
      
Message 46
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Happy Birthday (2 me)  a year later | 
      
      --> RV10-List message posted by: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
      
      Es hat mich ein kleines ber zwei hundert Bcke gekostet.
      
      Tim Olson -- RV-10  #40170
      DO NOT ARCHIVE
      
      
      Tim Dawson-Townsend wrote:
      > Tim:
      >  
      > Wieviel kostet es?
      >  
      > TDT
      > do not archive
      > 
      > ________________________________
      > 
      > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com on behalf of Tim Olson
      > Sent: Fri 12/16/2005 11:22 PM
      > To: RV10
      > Subject: RV10-List: Happy Birthday (2 me) a year later
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > Some of you may remember that a year ago for my birthday, I got an RV-10
      > hand carved model from my dad.  It was only one of 2 made by Griffin
      > Aerospace Models.  You may also remember that right after OSH 2005 this
      > summer, I sold off my highly prized posession to Dan Lloyd, because
      > Griffin said the cost of a repaint was basically equal for me to
      > the cost of having another one made...maybe a few more bucks to go
      > custom, but oh well.
      > 
      > Well today, just past that next birthday, I got my present in the mail
      > again, but this time it is truly "MY" RV10.  Attached are some photos.
      > I can highly recommend Griffin, as I believe Dan any myself would both
      > tell you that the quality is extrordinary.  The only thing missing on
      > mine is the antennas, which would be my fault since I didn't specify
      > them, and the photos I sent didn't show the antennas.
      > 
      > See below for the photos.  Here is Griffin's contact info:
      > 817-624-2320 or 866-584-0260
      > Fax 817-624-0422
      > 
      > Today, despite UPS not showing up with my fuel line stuff, I'm a very
      > happy boy.
      > 
      > To see a couple more pics, or if you get the digest version, here's a
      > link: http://www.myrv10.com/N104CD/misc/index.html
      > 
      > Tim
      > --
      > Tim Olson -- RV-10  #40170
      > DO NOT ARCHIVE
      > 
      > 
      
      
Message 47
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Happy Birthday (2 me)  a year later | 
      
      --> RV10-List message posted by: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
      
      Wow, I overlooked that!  You're right.  No, mine is on the left. ;)
      I'll have to debate on wether I want to send it back or not.
      I'll have to look it over closer and then determine how much it
      means to me.  I suppose if I sent it back, I could ask for the
      antennas too.  I just wouldn't want them to mess up the paint
      to move the door.
      
      
      Tim Olson -- RV-10  #40170
      DO NOT ARCHIVE
      
      
      Rene wrote:
      > --> RV10-List message posted by: "Rene" <rene@felker.com>
      > 
      > Tim, is the baggage door on the Right?  Is that where yours is?
      > 
      > Do Not Archive
      > 
      > Rene'
      > 801-721-6080
      > 
      > 
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tim Olson
      > Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 9:22 PM
      > To: RV10
      > Subject: RV10-List: Happy Birthday (2 me) a year later
      > 
      > Some of you may remember that a year ago for my birthday, I got an RV-10
      > hand carved model from my dad.  It was only one of 2 made by Griffin
      > Aerospace Models.  You may also remember that right after OSH 2005 this
      > summer, I sold off my highly prized posession to Dan Lloyd, because
      > Griffin said the cost of a repaint was basically equal for me to
      > the cost of having another one made...maybe a few more bucks to go
      > custom, but oh well.
      > 
      > Well today, just past that next birthday, I got my present in the mail
      > again, but this time it is truly "MY" RV10.  Attached are some photos.
      > I can highly recommend Griffin, as I believe Dan any myself would both
      > tell you that the quality is extrordinary.  The only thing missing on
      > mine is the antennas, which would be my fault since I didn't specify
      > them, and the photos I sent didn't show the antennas.
      > 
      > See below for the photos.  Here is Griffin's contact info:
      > 817-624-2320 or 866-584-0260
      > Fax 817-624-0422
      > 
      > Today, despite UPS not showing up with my fuel line stuff, I'm a very
      > happy boy.
      > 
      > To see a couple more pics, or if you get the digest version, here's a
      > link: http://www.myrv10.com/N104CD/misc/index.html
      > 
      > Tim
      
      
Message 48
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Happy Birthday (2 me)  a year later | 
      
      --> RV10-List message posted by: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
      
      I now see how it got on the wrong side.... My fault...
      
      On that paint layout page I had:
      http://www.myrv10.com/N104CD/paint/index.html
      
      That's what I sent them to go by for the paint design.  I'm not sure
      how the baggage door showed up on the right side, but I bet that
      in my paint scheme layout I flipped the line drawing into a mirror
      image to get the plane facing to the right.  That flipped the door.
      So, I guess it's my fault completely.
      
      Tim Olson -- RV-10  #40170
      
      
      Rene wrote:
      > --> RV10-List message posted by: "Rene" <rene@felker.com>
      > 
      > Tim, is the baggage door on the Right?  Is that where yours is?
      > 
      > Do Not Archive
      > 
      > Rene'
      > 801-721-6080
      > 
      > 
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tim Olson
      > Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 9:22 PM
      > To: RV10
      > Subject: RV10-List: Happy Birthday (2 me) a year later
      > 
      > Some of you may remember that a year ago for my birthday, I got an RV-10
      > hand carved model from my dad.  It was only one of 2 made by Griffin
      > Aerospace Models.  You may also remember that right after OSH 2005 this
      > summer, I sold off my highly prized posession to Dan Lloyd, because
      > Griffin said the cost of a repaint was basically equal for me to
      > the cost of having another one made...maybe a few more bucks to go
      > custom, but oh well.
      > 
      > Well today, just past that next birthday, I got my present in the mail
      > again, but this time it is truly "MY" RV10.  Attached are some photos.
      > I can highly recommend Griffin, as I believe Dan any myself would both
      > tell you that the quality is extrordinary.  The only thing missing on
      > mine is the antennas, which would be my fault since I didn't specify
      > them, and the photos I sent didn't show the antennas.
      > 
      > See below for the photos.  Here is Griffin's contact info:
      > 817-624-2320 or 866-584-0260
      > Fax 817-624-0422
      > 
      > Today, despite UPS not showing up with my fuel line stuff, I'm a very
      > happy boy.
      > 
      > To see a couple more pics, or if you get the digest version, here's a
      > link: http://www.myrv10.com/N104CD/misc/index.html
      > 
      > Tim
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |