Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 01:00 AM - Re: Sharpie marks on wingtip lens (John Cleary)
2. 11:46 AM - Re: Re: AOA Provisions for (RV Builder (Michael Sausen))
3. 04:55 PM - Re: Re: AOA Provisions for (Patrick Thyssen)
4. 06:54 PM - Re: AOA Provisions (Dan Masys)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Sharpie marks on wingtip lens |
--> RV10-List message posted by: "John Cleary" <johncleary@mangertonnsw.com>
Try methylated spirits,
John
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dan Masys
Sent: Sunday, 19 March 2006 6:50 AM
Subject: RV10-List: Sharpie marks on wingtip lens
--> RV10-List message posted by: Dan Masys <dmasys@cox.net>
I got a few straw blue sharpie marks on my wingtip lens. Tested various
solvents on a scrap piece to see if they would take the marks off without
dulling the surface of the plastic, and confirmed that MEK, Laquer thinner,
and Acetone all damage the plastic. WD-40 is ok, but doesn't take the marks
off :-(. Anybody know of a safe solvent?
Thanks in advance,
-Dan Masys
#400448 Finishing wings
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: AOA Provisions for |
Sorry, more of a blanket statement for DAR's or the FSDO's rather than referring
to a specific reg. We know they all have their own interpretation of the
regs. Off the top of my head I can't think of anything in part 91 (91.205 being
the closest IIRC) and, as you stated part, 23 is not necessarily pertinent
to experimental.
Michael Sausen
RV-10 #352 Working on Fuselage
Do Not Archive
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Scott Gesele
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 1:04 AM
Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: AOA Provisions for
--> RV10-List message posted by: Scott Gesele <sgesele@yahoo.com>
Mike,
Just curious, what part of the FARs are you referring to that requires stall warning
in an experimental? To the best of my knowledge there are no such requirements.
Scott Gesele
RV-6A Flying
> Time: 02:54:19 PM PST US
> Subject:
> Installation
> From: "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)"
> <rvbuilder@sausen.net>
<snip>
> Other than that the AoA should
> satisfy the regs as a stall
> warning device.
>
> Michael Sausen
> RV-10 #352 Working on Fuselage
> Do Not Archive
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: AOA Provisions for |
But it is wise to have one or the other.
Pat Thyssen
#257
"RV Builder (Michael Sausen)" <rvbuilder@sausen.net> wrote:
Sorry, more of a blanket statement for DAR's or the FSDO's rather than
referring to a specific reg. We know they all have their own interpretation of
the regs. Off the top of my head I can't think of anything in part 91 (91.205
being the closest IIRC) and, as you stated part, 23 is not necessarily pertinent
to experimental.
Michael Sausen
RV-10 #352 Working on Fuselage
Do Not Archive
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Scott Gesele
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 1:04 AM
Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: AOA Provisions for
--> RV10-List message posted by: Scott Gesele <sgesele@yahoo.com>
Mike,
Just curious, what part of the FARs are you referring to that requires stall warning
in an experimental? To the best of my knowledge there are no such requirements.
Scott Gesele
RV-6A Flying
> Time: 02:54:19 PM PST US
> Subject:
> Installation
> From: "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)"
> <rvbuilder@sausen.net>
<snip>
> Other than that the AoA should
> satisfy the regs as a stall
> warning device.
>
> Michael Sausen
> RV-10 #352 Working on Fuselage
> Do Not Archive
====================================
RV10-List Email Forum -
bsp;
">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
====================================
bsp; - List Contribution Web Site -
bsp; -Matt Dralle, List Admin.
">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
====================================
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: AOA Provisions |
--> RV10-List message posted by: Dan Masys <dmasys@cox.net>
The stall warning system on the -10 seemed the strangest part of the kit when I
got to that point, since the vast majority of flying RV's don't have any formal
stall warning system. The informal stall warning system, which is quite impressive
in my -7A, is the quite distinctive change in windstream noise in the
cockpit as the controls get soft and the nose comes up. If you get the plane
in a slip low and slow, such as steeply turning base to final with a crosswind,
the stall warning is that distinctive snap roll into a nosedive (just kidding,
but it sure does that, too.) Am probably a little more conservative than
many RV drivers, but I never let that sucker get slower than 80 kts indicated
until I am on short final. I remember that the only instruction I got from Ken
when I rode in Ole Blue at Van's factory was an emphatic "don't *ever* let a
short wing airplane go slow in the pattern." Doin' my best not to make it go
slow at any time :-). A little off topic, but not m
uch since the -10 is still relatively a short wing airplane.
-Dan Masys
#40448
> Sorry, more of a blanket statement for DAR's or the FSDO's rather than referring
to a specific reg. We know they all have their own interpretation of the
regs. Off the top of my head I can't think of anything in part 91 (91.205 being
the closest IIRC) and, as you stated part, 23 is not necessarily pertinent
to experimental.
>
>
> Michael Sausen
> RV-10 #352 Working on Fuselage
> Do Not Archive
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Scott Gesele
> Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 1:04 AM
> To: rv10-list@matronics.com
> Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: AOA Provisions for
>
> --> RV10-List message posted by: Scott Gesele <sgesele@yahoo.com>
>
> Mike,
>
> Just curious, what part of the FARs are you referring to that requires stall
warning in an experimental? To the best of my knowledge there are no such requirements.
>
> Scott Gesele
> RV-6A Flying
>
> > Time: 02:54:19 PM PST US
> > Subject:
> > Installation
> > From: "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)"
> > <rvbuilder@sausen.net>
> <snip>
> > Other than that the AoA should
> > satisfy the regs as a stall
> > warning device.
> >
> > Michael Sausen
> > RV-10 #352 Working on Fuselage
> > Do Not Archive
>
>
> __________________________________________________
>
>
>
> ====================================
> ====================================
> ====================================
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|