RV10-List Digest Archive

Thu 07/13/06


Total Messages Posted: 30



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:29 AM - Re: RV-10 vs RV-9 or 7 or 6 build time (Tom Gesele)
     2. 05:42 AM - Re: instrument sub-panel, fwd fuse and cabin cover questions (RV Builder (Michael Sausen))
     3. 06:21 AM - Re: instrument sub-panel, fwd fuse and cabin cover questions (John Testement)
     4. 06:27 AM - Re: instrument sub-panel, fwd fuse and cabin cover questions (Jesse Saint)
     5. 07:59 AM - Re: instrument sub-panel, fwd fuse and cabin cover questions (Ted French)
     6. 08:17 AM - Re: RV-10 vs RV-9 or 7 or 6 build time (Michael Schipper)
     7. 10:14 AM - Re: instrument sub-panel, fwd fuse and cabin cover questions (Jesse Saint)
     8. 11:35 AM - Relative Value for Complete RV-10's? (James K Hovis)
     9. 11:59 AM - Re: instrument sub-panel, fwd fuse and cabin cover questions (John W. Cox)
    10. 12:25 PM - Re: Relative Value for Complete RV-10's? (John Jessen)
    11. 12:30 PM - Re: Relative Value for Complete RV-10's? (Phil Hall)
    12. 12:30 PM - Re: instrument sub-panel, fwd fuse and cabin cover questions (Tim Dawson-Townsend)
    13. 12:41 PM - Re: Relative Value for Complete RV-10's? (Tim Dawson-Townsend)
    14. 01:08 PM - Re: instrument sub-panel, fwd fuse and cabin cover questions (John Jessen)
    15. 01:21 PM - Re: Relative Value for Complete RV-10's? (Tim Olson)
    16. 01:43 PM - Re: Relative Value for Complete RV-10's? (Bill DeRouchey)
    17. 02:05 PM - Re: Relative Value for Complete RV-10's? (Chris , Susie Darcy)
    18. 04:30 PM - Door fitting (rv10builder)
    19. 04:38 PM - Re: Relative Value for Complete RV-10's? (Tim Dawson-Townsend)
    20. 05:20 PM - Re: Relative Value for Complete RV-10's? (Pascal)
    21. 06:00 PM - Re: instrument sub-panel, fwd fuse and cabin cover questions (John W. Cox)
    22. 06:43 PM - Quick Build (QB) Wings & Fuse - Steps Remaining (Bill Reining)
    23. 06:53 PM - Re: RV-10 vs RV-9 or 7 or 6 build time (jerry petersen)
    24. 07:29 PM - covers (David McNeill)
    25. 09:02 PM - Re: covers (John Testement)
    26. 09:06 PM - Re: Quick Build (QB) Wings & Fuse - Steps Remaining (Robert G. Wright)
    27. 09:11 PM - Re: Quick Build (QB) Wings & Fuse - Steps Remaining (John Dunne)
    28. 09:14 PM -  (John Dunne)
    29. 10:17 PM - Re: Relative Value for Complete RV-10's? (linn Walters)
    30. 11:04 PM - Re: Door fitting (Tim Olson)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:29:34 AM PST US
    From: Tom Gesele <tgesele@optonline.net>
    Subject: RV-10 vs RV-9 or 7 or 6 build time
    --> RV10-List message posted by: Tom Gesele <tgesele@optonline.net> I buit a -6 to the point of needing to hang engine/install avionics and am currently at the exact same place on the -10 so my perspective is the construction of the kit as Van's supplied. On the -6, I had roughly 2500 hours in and on the -10 I've got 1150 in. My guess is engine and avionics will be roughly the same between the two. Both kits were slow builds, the -6 was pre-punched emp/wings. Keep in mind that the experience gained bulding the -6 translated into substantially faster build time on the -10 with far fewer mistakes. Hope this helps. - Tom Gesele #40473 -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of William DeLacey Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 11:20 PM --> RV10-List message posted by: "William DeLacey" <whd721@msn.com> I would like comments from any repeat builders as to the comparison of build times for the RV-10 verses any other previous RV they built. Comments like 20% more or half as much would be helpful. whd721@msn.com


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:42:14 AM PST US
    From: "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)" <rvbuilder@sausen.net>
    Subject: instrument sub-panel, fwd fuse and cabin cover questions
    --> RV10-List message posted by: "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)" <rvbuilder@sausen.net> Deems, One of the local builders here didn't install the forward deck until he was a couple weeks from flying. Why? Thank a certain panel builder for their timely delivery. ;-) He had everything done, hung, installed except for the windscreen, cowl, and anything that would attach to the deck. Michael Sausen RV-10 #352 Working on Fuselage -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Deems Davis Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 9:46 PM questions --> RV10-List message posted by: Deems Davis <deemsdavis@cox.net> I'd like any input regarding the installation of the above items. I don't bend like I used to and want to avoid as many contortions as possible, to that end I'd like to leave the fuse opened up as long as possible. 1. What things can I go ahead and attach to the instrument sub-panel while it's 'transportable' i.e not riveted to the Fuse? a. Other than the modifications to open up areas for avionics mounting, what other access holes have builders put in the sub-panel? b. has anybody installed anything on the FORWARD side of the sub-panel? What? c. Any other recommendations for sub-panel work before installing the upper fwd fuse? 2. How long can I leave the Cabin cover drilled/clecoed' before riveting it to the fuse? can the doors be(accurately) fit to the cabin w/ the cover only clecoed vs riveted? 3. Is it easier to install the windows with the cover on or off of the Fuse? I appreciate any input you might have. THANKS Deems Davis # 406 Finishing Fuse / Finishing http://deemsrv10.com/


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:21:52 AM PST US
    From: "John Testement" <jwt@roadmapscoaching.com>
    Subject: instrument sub-panel, fwd fuse and cabin cover questions
    Bill, can you post photos of the connector locations. Your description was helpful. Thanks. John Testement HYPERLINK "mailto:jwt@roadmapscoaching.com"jwt@roadmapscoaching.com 40321 Richmond, VA Finish kit - gear legs and wheels _____ [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill DeRouchey Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 12:56 AM questions I approached the fwd upper fuselage, panel, and cabin in the following order and in hindsight it worked well. Before the panel & fwd upper fuse were riveted to the lower fuselage I installed avionics, glass PFD, autopilot, engine monitor, voltage regulator, switch, and map box while the unit was on the bench. Three wire bundles [engine bay, left side run, right side run] were collected with long tails and each wire labeled with masking tape. A 37pin Amp plug was mounted to the sub-panel and all panel wiring passes through this plug. My fuse box, from West Marine, was installed on the sub-panel with only three fuses on the outer panel to shed load during an electrical emergency. Rivet the unit to the fuselage and run the bundles into the engine compartment and down the left and right sides. Now two work areas can be addressed independently - engine compartment and cabin. The wires on the side were either spliced or routed to one of my three connectors [L & R wing, tail]. The cabin was permanently installed next. I do not think the doors can be fitted properly unless the fiberglass cabin is in its final resting place. The doors are seated into the cabin opening by beveling both/either edges and small changes in the outer shell can have big effects on the door fit. Before I cemented the front windscreen, I installed the GPS antenna far forward in line with the co-pilot. Note that I also left vertical space so the antenna could be replaced with a newer antenna that supports WAAS. Windows, cabin doors, and FWF were next. Last item riveted were the two top tail skins. Leaving this to last was a big help routing wires through the tail. Bill DeRouchey - HYPERLINK "mailto:billderou@yahoo.com"billderou@yahoo.com N939SB, Kit #40029 Fly next week Deems Davis <deemsdavis@cox.net> wrote: --> RV10-List message posted by: Deems Davis I'd like any input regarding the installation of the above items. I don't bend like I used to and want to avoid as many contortions as possible, to that end I'd like to leave the fuse opened up as long as possible. 1. What things can I go ahead and attach to the instrument sub-panel while it's 'transportable' i.e not riveted to the Fuse? a. Other than the modifications to open up areas for avionics mounting, what other access holes have builders put in the -- No virus found in this incoming message. --


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:27:21 AM PST US
    From: "Jesse Saint" <jesse@itecusa.org>
    Subject: instrument sub-panel, fwd fuse and cabin cover questions
    --> RV10-List message posted by: "Jesse Saint" <jesse@itecusa.org> 1. What things can I go ahead and attach to the instrument sub-panel while it's 'transportable' i.e not riveted to the Fuse? a. Other than the modifications to open up areas for avionics mounting, what other access holes have builders put in the sub-panel? b. has anybody installed anything on the FORWARD side of the sub-panel? What? c. Any other recommendations for sub-panel work before installing the upper fwd fuse? Jesse: I just put in one big hole for the radio stack, then used the bottom of the sub-panel to hold adel clamps that all of my wires go through, then put holes and snap bushings in the sub-panel to route wires through to the firewall and down to the sides of the plane. I have my instrument cooling fan, power distribution bus block, MAP Sensor, Ammeter Shunt, and dimmer boards all on the sub-panel. That makes it really nice to work on the wiring just by removing the panel. Also, I have the crossbar under the instrument panel (although removeable with screws) there as an armrest if/when needed. In N256H we almost completely removed the sub-panel and then used angles to stiffen it back up, but then we had no good place to mount all of the things mentioned above. To each his own, but this worked great for us. 2. How long can I leave the Cabin cover drilled/clecoed' before riveting it to the fuse? can the doors be(accurately) fit to the cabin w/ the cover only clecoed vs riveted? Jesse: You can leave it there for as long as you want, but it will limit the amount of work that you can do. You may be able to fit the doors safely, but I don't know it I recommend it. Fitting the doors is a pretty important part. I guess, if you were to go ahead and bolt/screw the cabin top in where the door goes, then cleco it where all the pop rivets go, it should be pretty good. What are you trying to avoid by leaving it off. It is possible to install the upper forward fuse section after the cabin top is in place, although it is not quite as easy. 3. Is it easier to install the windows with the cover on or off of the Fuse? Jesse: I am sure it would be a fair bit easier with the cover off, but much safer with it on, because you really want to have it in the exact form that it will stay in before gluing the windows in IMHO. Hope this helps. Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. jesse@itecusa.org www.itecusa.org W: 352-465-4545 C: 352-427-0285 --


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:59:25 AM PST US
    From: "Ted French" <ted_french@telus.net>
    Subject: instrument sub-panel, fwd fuse and cabin cover questions
    --> RV10-List message posted by: "Ted French" <ted_french@telus.net> I installed the forward fuse assembly, but left the top skin off. Everything will be installed behind the panel in such a way that I can remove it to rivit the top skin on. As much panel wiring as possible is done on the bench. Do Not Archive Ted French RV-10 wiring -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Jesse Saint Sent: July 13, 2006 6:26 AM questions --> RV10-List message posted by: "Jesse Saint" <jesse@itecusa.org> 1. What things can I go ahead and attach to the instrument sub-panel while it's 'transportable' i.e not riveted to the Fuse? a. Other than the modifications to open up areas for avionics mounting, what other access holes have builders put in the sub-panel? b. has anybody installed anything on the FORWARD side of the sub-panel? What? c. Any other recommendations for sub-panel work before installing the upper fwd fuse? Jesse: I just put in one big hole for the radio stack, then used the bottom of the sub-panel to hold adel clamps that all of my wires go through, then put holes and snap bushings in the sub-panel to route wires through to the firewall and down to the sides of the plane. I have my instrument cooling fan, power distribution bus block, MAP Sensor, Ammeter Shunt, and dimmer boards all on the sub-panel. That makes it really nice to work on the wiring just by removing the panel. Also, I have the crossbar under the instrument panel (although removeable with screws) there as an armrest if/when needed. In N256H we almost completely removed the sub-panel and then used angles to stiffen it back up, but then we had no good place to mount all of the things mentioned above. To each his own, but this worked great for us. 2. How long can I leave the Cabin cover drilled/clecoed' before riveting it to the fuse? can the doors be(accurately) fit to the cabin w/ the cover only clecoed vs riveted? Jesse: You can leave it there for as long as you want, but it will limit the amount of work that you can do. You may be able to fit the doors safely, but I don't know it I recommend it. Fitting the doors is a pretty important part. I guess, if you were to go ahead and bolt/screw the cabin top in where the door goes, then cleco it where all the pop rivets go, it should be pretty good. What are you trying to avoid by leaving it off. It is possible to install the upper forward fuse section after the cabin top is in place, although it is not quite as easy. 3. Is it easier to install the windows with the cover on or off of the Fuse? Jesse: I am sure it would be a fair bit easier with the cover off, but much safer with it on, because you really want to have it in the exact form that it will stay in before gluing the windows in IMHO. Hope this helps. Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. jesse@itecusa.org www.itecusa.org W: 352-465-4545 C: 352-427-0285 --


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:17:01 AM PST US
    From: Michael Schipper <mike@learningplanet.com>
    Subject: Re: RV-10 vs RV-9 or 7 or 6 build time
    --> RV10-List message posted by: Michael Schipper <mike@learningplanet.com> Compared to the RV-9A, the RV-10 kit is very similar. The instructions, however, are far superior so far. It took about 1500 hours to complete my RV-9A slow build. Given the larger size of the RV-10 I figure it will take about 25% more time. The quickbuild would save a lot of time, but I enjoy building. Mike Schipper RV-9A - N63MS - Flying RV-10 #40576 - Working on Empennage http://www.rvten.com On Jul 12, 2006, at 10:20 PM, William DeLacey wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: "William DeLacey" <whd721@msn.com> > > I would like comments from any repeat builders as to the comparison > of build times for the RV-10 verses any other previous RV they > built. Comments like 20% more or half as much would be helpful. > > whd721@msn.com >


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:14:11 AM PST US
    From: "Jesse Saint" <jesse@itecusa.org>
    Subject: instrument sub-panel, fwd fuse and cabin cover questions
    --> RV10-List message posted by: "Jesse Saint" <jesse@itecusa.org> One big part of this equation is that installing it is only part of the decision. Working on it, upgrading, modifying is another huge part. The more stuff you put in a place that will be hard to get to, the more you may end up hating yourself down the road. Personally, I like the idea of being able to install the entire panel, including wiring runs for the whole fuselage, after the plane structure is complete. If I can get there in the first place, then I can get there to fix it. It might not look quite as neat under there when I am done, or quite as clean as having everything on forward side of the sub-panel, but I guarantee you are going to have fits when (not if) it comes time to change something. This brings up another issue. For those who are using Van's standard panel, cut the thing into at least 2 pieces. That thing is a very tight fit in one piece, and you are guaranteed to scratch stuff getting it in and out. The easier it is to take out, the less time you will spend on your back working under there and the more time you will spend sitting in the nice comfortable seat working back there with the panel removed. This is just IMHO, but I have done two now, two different ways, and I am realizing how much of a pain it is to work under that panel. Do not archive. Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. jesse@itecusa.org www.itecusa.org W: 352-465-4545 C: 352-427-0285 -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ted French Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 10:54 AM questions --> RV10-List message posted by: "Ted French" <ted_french@telus.net> I installed the forward fuse assembly, but left the top skin off. Everything will be installed behind the panel in such a way that I can remove it to rivit the top skin on. As much panel wiring as possible is done on the bench. Do Not Archive Ted French RV-10 wiring -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Jesse Saint Sent: July 13, 2006 6:26 AM questions --> RV10-List message posted by: "Jesse Saint" <jesse@itecusa.org> 1. What things can I go ahead and attach to the instrument sub-panel while it's 'transportable' i.e not riveted to the Fuse? a. Other than the modifications to open up areas for avionics mounting, what other access holes have builders put in the sub-panel? b. has anybody installed anything on the FORWARD side of the sub-panel? What? c. Any other recommendations for sub-panel work before installing the upper fwd fuse? Jesse: I just put in one big hole for the radio stack, then used the bottom of the sub-panel to hold adel clamps that all of my wires go through, then put holes and snap bushings in the sub-panel to route wires through to the firewall and down to the sides of the plane. I have my instrument cooling fan, power distribution bus block, MAP Sensor, Ammeter Shunt, and dimmer boards all on the sub-panel. That makes it really nice to work on the wiring just by removing the panel. Also, I have the crossbar under the instrument panel (although removeable with screws) there as an armrest if/when needed. In N256H we almost completely removed the sub-panel and then used angles to stiffen it back up, but then we had no good place to mount all of the things mentioned above. To each his own, but this worked great for us. 2. How long can I leave the Cabin cover drilled/clecoed' before riveting it to the fuse? can the doors be(accurately) fit to the cabin w/ the cover only clecoed vs riveted? Jesse: You can leave it there for as long as you want, but it will limit the amount of work that you can do. You may be able to fit the doors safely, but I don't know it I recommend it. Fitting the doors is a pretty important part. I guess, if you were to go ahead and bolt/screw the cabin top in where the door goes, then cleco it where all the pop rivets go, it should be pretty good. What are you trying to avoid by leaving it off. It is possible to install the upper forward fuse section after the cabin top is in place, although it is not quite as easy. 3. Is it easier to install the windows with the cover on or off of the Fuse? Jesse: I am sure it would be a fair bit easier with the cover off, but much safer with it on, because you really want to have it in the exact form that it will stay in before gluing the windows in IMHO. Hope this helps. Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. jesse@itecusa.org www.itecusa.org W: 352-465-4545 C: 352-427-0285 -- -- No virus found in this incoming message. --


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:35:12 AM PST US
    From: "James K Hovis" <james.k.hovis@gmail.com>
    Subject: Relative Value for Complete RV-10's?
    As noted before I've been lurking absorbing the material before I actually make the plunge and get a RV-10 kit. One question I'd like to post to you here is what you think the relative value for a completed RV-10 would be if one was to sell their aircraft on the open market? I know that type of question would probably lead to many different answers since each airplane built is a little different from the next based on builder preferences and such. For example, one guy could build a strictly VFR machine while his buddy a few hangers away has a hard IFR capable machine. What I'm thinking is a moderate to high hp engine (235 to 260 hp) and probably light duty IFR capable (i.e. basic gauges with maybe one or two EFIS displays and engine monitor). If I can reasonably assure the household finance minister that I can get a good return on my investment, it might sway her towards my thinking. I've seen one RV-10 offered for $220,000 and a partially finished a/c for $175,000. I'd assume there hasn't been many sold since finished birds haven't been flying long, but any info from the list is helpful. Thanks. James K. Hovis


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:59:27 AM PST US
    From: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox@pacificnw.com>
    Subject: instrument sub-panel, fwd fuse and cabin cover questions
    --> RV10-List message posted by: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox@pacificnw.com> Jesse & Ted As an aged (56+), height (74"), and weight (240#), tri-focal impaired builder - your idea needs repeated illumination. Always ask, "How will I be servicing this item down the road". Dan has done a great job on his site of the many changes, improvements and repairs which are seldom thought out in the quest for "Just Building It" and "blindly following the instructions". Partial panel (sub panel) design, service lengths on wire runs, style of connectors/disconnections, attachment points and process to ease of repair are the source of most cussing at the airlines each night. Those damned teenage computer hackers sitting at 24" flat screen LCD monitors with 1680x1050 resolution who design aircraft subsystems with no regard to servicing. We just smile and say "Oh yeh, it all pays by the hour - not the piece". As a kit builder, it is tough to fault oneself for moving blindly into the future of serviceability after choosing to just go blindly. We usually only think about oil changes and refueling - right? At your age, you should spent time just flying and pondering what it will be like in 40 years doing the servicing ;-). John - KUAO Do not Archive -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Saint Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 10:07 AM questions --> RV10-List message posted by: "Jesse Saint" <jesse@itecusa.org> One big part of this equation is that installing it is only part of the decision. Working on it, upgrading, modifying is another huge part. The more stuff you put in a place that will be hard to get to, the more you may end up hating yourself down the road. Personally, I like the idea of being able to install the entire panel, including wiring runs for the whole fuselage, after the plane structure is complete. If I can get there in the first place, then I can get there to fix it. It might not look quite as neat under there when I am done, or quite as clean as having everything on forward side of the sub-panel, but I guarantee you are going to have fits when (not if) it comes time to change something. This brings up another issue. For those who are using Van's standard panel, cut the thing into at least 2 pieces. That thing is a very tight fit in one piece, and you are guaranteed to scratch stuff getting it in and out. The easier it is to take out, the less time you will spend on your back working under there and the more time you will spend sitting in the nice comfortable seat working back there with the panel removed. This is just IMHO, but I have done two now, two different ways, and I am realizing how much of a pain it is to work under that panel. Do not archive. Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. jesse@itecusa.org www.itecusa.org W: 352-465-4545 C: 352-427-0285


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:25:26 PM PST US
    From: "John Jessen" <jjessen@rcn.com>
    Subject: Relative Value for Complete RV-10's?
    I'd bet Tim Olson could sell his for more than $220k. But, I like the paint scheme. Or, just take her down to a Cirrus dealer and show her the price tag. Then, explain to her how the -10 is a better plane in terms of: useful load, economy, comfort in the back and front, overall costs, etc, etc. I think that she'd get the idea pretty fast. John Jessen do not archive _____ [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of James K Hovis Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 11:28 AM As noted before I've been lurking absorbing the material before I actually make the plunge and get a RV-10 kit. One question I'd like to post to you here is what you think the relative value for a completed RV-10 would be if one was to sell their aircraft on the open market? I know that type of question would probably lead to many different answers since each airplane built is a little different from the next based on builder preferences and such. For example, one guy could build a strictly VFR machine while his buddy a few hangers away has a hard IFR capable machine. What I'm thinking is a moderate to high hp engine (235 to 260 hp) and probably light duty IFR capable ( i.e. basic gauges with maybe one or two EFIS displays and engine monitor). If I can reasonably assure the household finance minister that I can get a good return on my investment, it might sway her towards my thinking. I've seen one RV-10 offered for $220,000 and a partially finished a/c for $175,000. I'd assume there hasn't been many sold since finished birds haven't been flying long, but any info from the list is helpful. Thanks. James K. Hovis


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:30:09 PM PST US
    From: Phil Hall <phil@asibuildings.com>
    Subject: Re: Relative Value for Complete RV-10's?
    --> RV10-List message posted by: Phil Hall <phil@asibuildings.com> James, I have a 10 that is close to being done and have $125,000 invested in it and I have to sell it. I will sell it for $125,000. I0-540, MT prop, dual GRT EFIS, etc. The only thing left to purchase is upholstery and paint Phil 40122 888-583-5155 At 01:28 PM 7/13/2006 -0500, you wrote: > > As noted before I've been lurking absorbing the material before I actually > make the plunge and get a RV-10 kit. One question I'd like to post to you > here is what you think the relative value for a completed RV-10 would be if > one was to sell their aircraft on the open market? I know that type of > question would probably lead to many different answers since each airplane > built is a little different from the next based on builder preferences and > such. For example, one guy could build a strictly VFR machine while his buddy > a few hangers away has a hard IFR capable machine. What I'm thinking is a > moderate to high hp engine (235 to 260 hp) and probably light duty IFR > capable ( i.e. basic gauges with maybe one or two EFIS displays and engine > monitor). If I can reasonably assure the household finance minister that I > can get a good return on my investment, it might sway her towards my > thinking. I've seen one RV-10 offered for $220,000 and a partially finished > a/c for $175,000. I'd assume there hasn't been many sold since finished birds > haven't been flying long, but any info from the list is helpful. > > Thanks. > > James K. Hovis


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:30:09 PM PST US
    From: "Tim Dawson-Townsend" <Tdawson@avidyne.com>
    Subject: instrument sub-panel, fwd fuse and cabin cover questions
    --> RV10-List message posted by: "Tim Dawson-Townsend" <Tdawson@Avidyne.com> As a "computer hacker sitting at flat screen LCD monitors with 1680x1050 resolution who design aircraft subsystems", I feel hurt . . . : ) TDT 40025 Do not archive -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John W. Cox Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 2:56 PM questions --> RV10-List message posted by: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox@pacificnw.com> Jesse & Ted As an aged (56+), height (74"), and weight (240#), tri-focal impaired builder - your idea needs repeated illumination. Always ask, "How will I be servicing this item down the road". Dan has done a great job on his site of the many changes, improvements and repairs which are seldom thought out in the quest for "Just Building It" and "blindly following the instructions". Partial panel (sub panel) design, service lengths on wire runs, style of connectors/disconnections, attachment points and process to ease of repair are the source of most cussing at the airlines each night. Those damned teenage computer hackers sitting at 24" flat screen LCD monitors with 1680x1050 resolution who design aircraft subsystems with no regard to servicing. We just smile and say "Oh yeh, it all pays by the hour - not the piece". As a kit builder, it is tough to fault oneself for moving blindly into the future of serviceability after choosing to just go blindly. We usually only think about oil changes and refueling - right? At your age, you should spent time just flying and pondering what it will be like in 40 years doing the servicing ;-). John - KUAO Do not Archive -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Saint Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 10:07 AM questions --> RV10-List message posted by: "Jesse Saint" <jesse@itecusa.org> One big part of this equation is that installing it is only part of the decision. Working on it, upgrading, modifying is another huge part. The more stuff you put in a place that will be hard to get to, the more you may end up hating yourself down the road. Personally, I like the idea of being able to install the entire panel, including wiring runs for the whole fuselage, after the plane structure is complete. If I can get there in the first place, then I can get there to fix it. It might not look quite as neat under there when I am done, or quite as clean as having everything on forward side of the sub-panel, but I guarantee you are going to have fits when (not if) it comes time to change something. This brings up another issue. For those who are using Van's standard panel, cut the thing into at least 2 pieces. That thing is a very tight fit in one piece, and you are guaranteed to scratch stuff getting it in and out. The easier it is to take out, the less time you will spend on your back working under there and the more time you will spend sitting in the nice comfortable seat working back there with the panel removed. This is just IMHO, but I have done two now, two different ways, and I am realizing how much of a pain it is to work under that panel. Do not archive. Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. jesse@itecusa.org www.itecusa.org W: 352-465-4545 C: 352-427-0285


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:41:28 PM PST US
    From: "Tim Dawson-Townsend" <Tdawson@avidyne.com>
    Subject: Relative Value for Complete RV-10's?
    --> RV10-List message posted by: "Tim Dawson-Townsend" <Tdawson@Avidyne.com> That's a good deal . . . TDT do not archive -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Phil Hall Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 8:09 AM --> RV10-List message posted by: Phil Hall <phil@asibuildings.com> James, I have a 10 that is close to being done and have $125,000 invested in it and I have to sell it. I will sell it for $125,000. I0-540, MT prop, dual GRT EFIS, etc. The only thing left to purchase is upholstery and paint Phil 40122 888-583-5155 At 01:28 PM 7/13/2006 -0500, you wrote: > > As noted before I've been lurking absorbing the material before I actually > make the plunge and get a RV-10 kit. One question I'd like to post to you > here is what you think the relative value for a completed RV-10 would be if > one was to sell their aircraft on the open market? I know that type of > question would probably lead to many different answers since each airplane > built is a little different from the next based on builder preferences and > such. For example, one guy could build a strictly VFR machine while his buddy > a few hangers away has a hard IFR capable machine. What I'm thinking is a > moderate to high hp engine (235 to 260 hp) and probably light duty IFR > capable ( i.e. basic gauges with maybe one or two EFIS displays and engine > monitor). If I can reasonably assure the household finance minister that I > can get a good return on my investment, it might sway her towards my > thinking. I've seen one RV-10 offered for $220,000 and a partially finished > a/c for $175,000. I'd assume there hasn't been many sold since finished birds > haven't been flying long, but any info from the list is helpful. > > Thanks. > > James K. Hovis


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:08:37 PM PST US
    From: "John Jessen" <jjessen@rcn.com>
    Subject: instrument sub-panel, fwd fuse and cabin cover questions
    --> RV10-List message posted by: "John Jessen" <jjessen@rcn.com> Anyone trying to make these vunderbar panels tilt down or slide out or somehow easily removable for future repair or rewire work? Got some examples you're willing to share. And for those who have been silent all this time while building the stealth OSH winner, could you please consider sharing so others can benefit? Many thanks John Jessen -328 (about ready to resume building again, now that the rental is back together) -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tim Dawson-Townsend Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 12:09 PM questions --> RV10-List message posted by: "Tim Dawson-Townsend" --> <Tdawson@Avidyne.com> As a "computer hacker sitting at flat screen LCD monitors with 1680x1050 resolution who design aircraft subsystems", I feel hurt . . . : ) TDT 40025 Do not archive -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John W. Cox Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 2:56 PM questions --> RV10-List message posted by: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox@pacificnw.com> Jesse & Ted As an aged (56+), height (74"), and weight (240#), tri-focal impaired builder - your idea needs repeated illumination. Always ask, "How will I be servicing this item down the road". Dan has done a great job on his site of the many changes, improvements and repairs which are seldom thought out in the quest for "Just Building It" and "blindly following the instructions". Partial panel (sub panel) design, service lengths on wire runs, style of connectors/disconnections, attachment points and process to ease of repair are the source of most cussing at the airlines each night. Those damned teenage computer hackers sitting at 24" flat screen LCD monitors with 1680x1050 resolution who design aircraft subsystems with no regard to servicing. We just smile and say "Oh yeh, it all pays by the hour - not the piece". As a kit builder, it is tough to fault oneself for moving blindly into the future of serviceability after choosing to just go blindly. We usually only think about oil changes and refueling - right? At your age, you should spent time just flying and pondering what it will be like in 40 years doing the servicing ;-). John - KUAO Do not Archive -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Saint Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 10:07 AM questions --> RV10-List message posted by: "Jesse Saint" <jesse@itecusa.org> One big part of this equation is that installing it is only part of the decision. Working on it, upgrading, modifying is another huge part. The more stuff you put in a place that will be hard to get to, the more you may end up hating yourself down the road. Personally, I like the idea of being able to install the entire panel, including wiring runs for the whole fuselage, after the plane structure is complete. If I can get there in the first place, then I can get there to fix it. It might not look quite as neat under there when I am done, or quite as clean as having everything on forward side of the sub-panel, but I guarantee you are going to have fits when (not if) it comes time to change something. This brings up another issue. For those who are using Van's standard panel, cut the thing into at least 2 pieces. That thing is a very tight fit in one piece, and you are guaranteed to scratch stuff getting it in and out. The easier it is to take out, the less time you will spend on your back working under there and the more time you will spend sitting in the nice comfortable seat working back there with the panel removed. This is just IMHO, but I have done two now, two different ways, and I am realizing how much of a pain it is to work under that panel. Do not archive. Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. jesse@itecusa.org www.itecusa.org W: 352-465-4545 C: 352-427-0285


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:21:07 PM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: Relative Value for Complete RV-10's?
    --> RV10-List message posted by: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com> No, I couldn't.....my wife would kill me. ;) Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying do not archive John Jessen wrote: > I'd bet Tim Olson could sell his for more than $220k. But, I like the > paint scheme. Or, just take her down to a Cirrus dealer and show her > the price tag. Then, explain to her how the -10 is a better plane in > terms of: useful load, economy, comfort in the back and front, overall > costs, etc, etc. I think that she'd get the idea pretty fast. > > John Jessen > > do not archive > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *James K Hovis > *Sent:* Thursday, July 13, 2006 11:28 AM > *To:* rv10-list@matronics.com > *Subject:* RV10-List: Relative Value for Complete RV-10's? > > As noted before I've been lurking absorbing the material before I > actually make the plunge and get a RV-10 kit. One question I'd like to > post to you here is what you think the relative value for a completed > RV-10 would be if one was to sell their aircraft on the open market? I > know that type of question would probably lead to many different answers > since each airplane built is a little different from the next based on > builder preferences and such. For example, one guy could build a > strictly VFR machine while his buddy a few hangers away has a hard > IFR capable machine. What I'm thinking is a moderate to high hp engine > (235 to 260 hp) and probably light duty IFR capable ( i.e. basic gauges > with maybe one or two EFIS displays and engine monitor). If I can > reasonably assure the household finance minister that I can get a good > return on my investment, it might sway her towards my thinking. I've > seen one RV-10 offered for $220,000 and a partially finished a/c for > $175,000. I'd assume there hasn't been many sold since finished birds > haven't been flying long, but any info from the list is helpful. > > Thanks. > > James K. Hovis


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:43:33 PM PST US
    From: Bill DeRouchey <billderou@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Relative Value for Complete RV-10's?
    James- The decision to purchase/build an RV-10 is a slam dunk. Its a great plane and, properly equipped, will hold its value until you decide its time to convert it back into cash. I know of no other comparable airplane from a cost/benefit viewpoint. The real problem is how to convince the finance minister that she will benefit from the endeaver and the temporary storage of money can be traded for a great lifestyle enhancement. Suggest you drop phrases such as "good return on investment" or any link between investment and aircraft. It may get the aircraft in the garage but will poison all that follows. Bill DeRouchey N939SB, #40029, billderou@yahoo.com fly next week do not archive James K Hovis <james.k.hovis@gmail.com> wrote: As noted before I've been lurking absorbing the material before I actually make the plunge and get a RV-10 kit. One question I'd like to post to you here is what you think the relative value for a completed RV-10 would be if one was to sell their aircraft on the open market? I know that type of question would probably lead to many different answers since each airplane built is a little different from the next based on builder preferences and such. For example, one guy could build a strictly VFR machine while his buddy a few hangers away has a hard IFR capable machine. What I'm thinking is a moderate to high hp engine (235 to 260 hp) and probably light duty IFR capable ( i.e. basic gauges with maybe one or two EFIS displays and engine monitor). If I can reasonably assure the household finance minister that I can get a good return on my investment, it might sway her towards my thinking. I've seen one RV-10 offered for $220,000 and a partially finished a/c for $175,000. I'd assume there hasn't been many sold since finished birds haven't been flying long, but any info from the list is helpful. Thanks. James K. Hovis


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:05:39 PM PST US
    From: "Chris , Susie Darcy" <VHMUM@bigpond.com>
    Subject: Re: Relative Value for Complete RV-10's?
    John you are right as some are pooring a small fortune into these toys. Over here things are a bit diferent ,small population etc. So at prices over 200k AUS people will have a huge choice of aircraft ofcourse second hand but most were not built in someones shed. Like our 6 that we sold we are building the 10 as light as possible and as cheap as possible with not sacrifising Quality etc. Will be using an overhauled engine to keep price down. We will not be going IFR so basic panel maybe 2 Dynons with no back up instruments. Yes lashing out on glass but thats it. No auto pilot as my wife flys to so one of us is always hands on or we might as well fly in a airliner (cheaper). So you can build a quality aircraft VFR at a reasonable price and get your money back. We doubled our money on the 6 which was light and simple but I think we can only get %30 more than cost to build on 10 but we shall see when we eventuly sell it. Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: John Jessen To: rv10-list@matronics.com Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 5:09 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Relative Value for Complete RV-10's? I'd bet Tim Olson could sell his for more than $220k. But, I like the paint scheme. Or, just take her down to a Cirrus dealer and show her the price tag. Then, explain to her how the -10 is a better plane in terms of: useful load, economy, comfort in the back and front, overall costs, etc, etc. I think that she'd get the idea pretty fast. John Jessen do not archive ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of James K Hovis Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 11:28 AM To: rv10-list@matronics.com Subject: RV10-List: Relative Value for Complete RV-10's? As noted before I've been lurking absorbing the material before I actually make the plunge and get a RV-10 kit. One question I'd like to post to you here is what you think the relative value for a completed RV-10 would be if one was to sell their aircraft on the open market? I know that type of question would probably lead to many different answers since each airplane built is a little different from the next based on builder preferences and such. For example, one guy could build a strictly VFR machine while his buddy a few hangers away has a hard IFR capable machine. What I'm thinking is a moderate to high hp engine (235 to 260 hp) and probably light duty IFR capable ( i.e. basic gauges with maybe one or two EFIS displays and engine monitor). If I can reasonably assure the household finance minister that I can get a good return on my investment, it might sway her towards my thinking. I've seen one RV-10 offered for $220,000 and a partially finished a/c for $175,000. I'd assume there hasn't been many sold since finished birds haven't been flying long, but any info from the list is helpful. Thanks. James K. Hovis


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:30:17 PM PST US
    From: "rv10builder" <rv10builder@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Door fitting
    For those of you that have fitted your doors... I am finding that a considerable amount of material must be removed from the door perimeter to get them to where they'll recess into the canopy opening. By considerable I mean that possibly 1/8 to 1/4 further than the scribe line is removed. Is this normal? Just being cautious! Brian 40308 (doors) http://www.mykitlog.com/rv10builder


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:38:46 PM PST US
    From: "Tim Dawson-Townsend" <Tdawson@avidyne.com>
    Subject: Relative Value for Complete RV-10's?
    Pointing out the travel time savings for visiting the finance minister's sisters helped me! "Look, Hon, your sister is only 3 hours away in an RV-10" . . . TDT do not archive -----Original Message----- Sent: Thu 7/13/2006 4:38 PM James- The decision to purchase/build an RV-10 is a slam dunk. Its a great plane and, properly equipped, will hold its value until you decide its time to convert it back into cash. I know of no other comparable airplane from a cost/benefit viewpoint. The real problem is how to convince the finance minister that she will benefit from the endeaver and the temporary storage of money can be traded for a great lifestyle enhancement. Suggest you drop phrases such as "good return on investment" or any link between investment and aircraft. It may get the aircraft in the garage but will poison all that follows. Bill DeRouchey N939SB, #40029, billderou@yahoo.com fly next week do not archive James K Hovis <james.k.hovis@gmail.com> wrote: As noted before I've been lurking absorbing the material before I actually make the plunge and get a RV-10 kit. One question I'd like to post to you here is what you think the relative value for a completed RV-10 would be if one was to sell their aircraft on the open market? I know that type of question would probably lead to many different answers since each airplane built is a little different from the next based on builder preferences and such. For example, one guy could build a strictly VFR machine while his buddy a few hangers away has a hard IFR capable machine. What I'm thinking is a moderate to high hp engine (235 to 260 hp) and probably light duty IFR capable ( i.e. basic gauges with maybe one or two EFIS displays and engine monitor). If I can reasonably assure the household finance minister that I can get a good return on my investment, it might sway her towards my thinking. I've seen one RV-10 offered for $220,000 and a partially finished a/c for $175,000. I'd assume there hasn't been many sold since finished birds haven't been flying long, but any info from the list is helpful. Thanks. James K. Hovis


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:20:28 PM PST US
    From: "Pascal" <pascalreid@verizon.net>
    Subject: Re: Relative Value for Complete RV-10's?
    I see you questions are focused on resale. I have a few for you however (but there are hundreds of questions I assume you have reviewed before reaching the finacial piece) - Do you have a strong desire to build a plane? 1250 or so hours of your life is a lot of time to be spending for good resale value - Does the finance minister like to fly- will she look forward to going on trips that take too long to get to by auto? - Do you understand that the price to build the plane is only the start of the finances you'll be spending (Taxes, hangar, maintenance (oil, etc) that can add up to 10% yearly. With that said, I have not started the building but I have a stronger desire to build the plane than to fly it and one day will be ready to sell it for another reason. I have no doubt I'll get my time and money back when the plane is sold. Simply put my CFO supports the RV-10 because she knows I love to build and have spent 7 years planning and saving for a kit plane. She also really wants to take trips we simply can not go on due to distance and time to get there, those two and not the resale works for me, if your answer to the three questions is "yes" and your wife understands the implication of your time building, the resale value should be an easy sale for you. Just don't get caught up with the money and forget why your building the plane to start with- unless of course it is as an investment with hopes of making money on your labor and not for the pleasure it will bring. Best of success with your propostion to the finance minister Pascal ----- Original Message ----- From: James K Hovis To: rv10-list@matronics.com Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 11:28 AM Subject: RV10-List: Relative Value for Complete RV-10's? As noted before I've been lurking absorbing the material before I actually make the plunge and get a RV-10 kit. One question I'd like to post to you here is what you think the relative value for a completed RV-10 would be if one was to sell their aircraft on the open market? I know that type of question would probably lead to many different answers since each airplane built is a little different from the next based on builder preferences and such. For example, one guy could build a strictly VFR machine while his buddy a few hangers away has a hard IFR capable machine. What I'm thinking is a moderate to high hp engine (235 to 260 hp) and probably light duty IFR capable ( i.e. basic gauges with maybe one or two EFIS displays and engine monitor). If I can reasonably assure the household finance minister that I can get a good return on my investment, it might sway her towards my thinking. I've seen one RV-10 offered for $220,000 and a partially finished a/c for $175,000. I'd assume there hasn't been many sold since finished birds haven't been flying long, but any info from the list is helpful. Thanks. James K. Hovis


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:00:23 PM PST US
    From: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox@pacificnw.com>
    Subject: instrument sub-panel, fwd fuse and cabin cover questions
    --> RV10-List message posted by: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox@pacificnw.com> Tim, have you been upside down for 90 +minutes, trying to reach for specialty tools, sweating in 115 degree heat and wondering where you sat that thing-a-me-gig while standing on your head to replace a bad cannon plug connector? I can spin an X-Y-Z axis file in turbocad, solidworks or autocad a lot quicker in my air-conditioned office with a Starbucks double venti bla, bla, bla and my favorite toon on my MP3. Now I understand that the Boeing 777 was conceived totally in cyberspace, but I know the mechanics at Everett that forced those kids to redraw systems a zillion times till the service component was near perfection. We become those guys. John PS - I am looking forward to your completed panel and serviceable aircraft. Thanks for the picture. -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tim Dawson-Townsend Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 12:09 PM questions --> RV10-List message posted by: "Tim Dawson-Townsend" <Tdawson@Avidyne.com> As a "computer hacker sitting at flat screen LCD monitors with 1680x1050 resolution who design aircraft subsystems", I feel hurt . . . : ) TDT 40025 Do not archive


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:43:40 PM PST US
    From: "Bill Reining" <wreining@gmail.com>
    Subject: Quick Build (QB) Wings & Fuse - Steps Remaining
    Has anyone posted a detailed list of what has already been done, and what remains to be done, for the QB wings and fuselage? Ideally something that references the plans, such as: for the wings, sections xx all complete, steps yy in section zz. need to be finished. I checked the archive, but had no luck. Bill Reining - going to OSH all week Tail cone 40514 N475R reserved


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:53:17 PM PST US
    From: jerry petersen <bldanrv9a@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: RV-10 vs RV-9 or 7 or 6 build time
    --> RV10-List message posted by: jerry petersen <bldanrv9a@yahoo.com> The RV-10 is taking at least 25% to 40% longer to complete than the 9A did. There are always lots of variables in comparisons but it does take longer. --- Michael Schipper <mike@learningplanet.com> wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: Michael Schipper > <mike@learningplanet.com> > > Compared to the RV-9A, the RV-10 kit is very > similar. The > instructions, however, are far superior so far. > > It took about 1500 hours to complete my RV-9A slow > build. Given the > larger size of the RV-10 I figure it will take about > 25% more time. > The quickbuild would save a lot of time, but I enjoy > building. > > Mike Schipper > RV-9A - N63MS - Flying > RV-10 #40576 - Working on Empennage > http://www.rvten.com > > > On Jul 12, 2006, at 10:20 PM, William DeLacey wrote: > > > --> RV10-List message posted by: "William DeLacey" > <whd721@msn.com> > > > > I would like comments from any repeat builders as > to the comparison > > of build times for the RV-10 verses any other > previous RV they > > built. Comments like 20% more or half as much > would be helpful. > > > > whd721@msn.com > > > > > > > > browse > Subscriptions page, > FAQ, > > > Admin. > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:29:23 PM PST US
    From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007@cox.net>
    Subject: covers
    In section 35 of the plans, there is a F-1042G-R and -L but below those "wire covers" is a rectangular area where most of my wiring appears. Does Van's supply or do we just fabricate?


    Message 25


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:02:01 PM PST US
    From: "John Testement" <jwt@roadmapscoaching.com>
    Subject: covers
    You can order these from Vans. They also come in their wiring kit (which I don't recommend unless you are doing a very basic panel). The wiring kit plans are available separately (to get part numbers from). Tim O. can give you access to a part of his site with the plans. John Testement HYPERLINK "mailto:jwt@roadmapscoaching.com"jwt@roadmapscoaching.com 40321 Richmond, VA Finish kit - gear legs and wheels _____ [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of David McNeill Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 10:25 PM In section 35 of the plans, there is a F-1042G-R and -L but below those "wire covers" is a rectangular area where most of my wiring appears. Does Van's supply or do we just fabricate? -- No virus found in this incoming message. --


    Message 26


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:06:06 PM PST US
    From: "Robert G. Wright" <armywrights@adelphia.net>
    Subject: Quick Build (QB) Wings & Fuse - Steps Remaining
    Bill, good luck on this one. When my QB Wings and Fuse arrived, I went through the plans as thoroughly as I thought I could, noting what was left to do, but didn't make a separate list. Even if I had, I've found lately that I've had to go back and do things that I overlooked, and then go back and fit the thing I was working on in the first place! It's not bad because it's kind of a checks and balances, but it sure throws you off of your rhythm when it happens. For me, these incidental things just "get done" and I've not tried to annotate them when I come across them, because it's all in the name of getting back to the original task. So a good, thorough, complete list seems like pie in the sky. There are parts of the plans, however, that do say for Slowbuild, do this, for QB, do this. That's not everywhere in the plans, but seems to be the author's choice when he wrote that section. Probably wouldn't be hard for Vans to make a separate set of plans since the QB stuff is done the same way every time, but then we wouldn't have the slow-build sections to reference in case we needed to redo a part or needed to modify something to suit our own missions. Rob Wright #392 QB Wings Tru-Trak Servos delivered yesterday! Finishing kit delivery next Thurs! Engine paid for awaiting delivery! Need more money/time/arms! _____ [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill Reining Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 8:42 PM Has anyone posted a detailed list of what has already been done, and what remains to be done, for the QB wings and fuselage? Ideally something that references the plans, such as: for the wings, sections xx all complete, steps yy in section zz. need to be finished. I checked the archive, but had no luck. Bill Reining - going to OSH all week Tail cone 40514 N475R reserved


    Message 27


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:11:40 PM PST US
    From: "John Dunne" <acs@acspropeller.com.au>
    Subject: Quick Build (QB) Wings & Fuse - Steps Remaining
    Bill this would be extremely helpful but you'll find most likely it doesn't exist. The problem as I see it, is you don't really want to encourage someone starting out from point x without the intellectual catch up on what has been done for you already, particularly when the potential is for minor variations and discrepancies between QB's which shouldn't happen with good QC but nonetheless does. You will see on certain pages of the plans, references to Standard build and QB but it's my experience that you need to read and re-read everything that's gone before in any case to be on the safe side and to feel mentally "up to speed" with the project. Identify everything page by page as per the standard plans and verify it has been completed correctly is best engineering practice. John 40315 ACS * John Dunne Managing Director acs@acspropeller.com.au Aviation Component Services (Qld) Pty Ltd. Building 612 Lores Bonney Drive, Archerfield Airport Queensland Australia. PH:61 7 3274 4500 FAX:61 7 3274 4010 "Everything Propeller" _____ [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill Reining Sent: Friday, 14 July 2006 11:42 AM Has anyone posted a detailed list of what has already been done, and what remains to be done, for the QB wings and fuselage? Ideally something that references the plans, such as: for the wings, sections xx all complete, steps yy in section zz. need to be finished. I checked the archive, but had no luck. Bill Reining - going to OSH all week Tail cone 40514 N475R reserved


    Message 28


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:14:47 PM PST US
    From: "John Dunne" <acs@acspropeller.com.au>
    Subject:
    My apologies to the list, I didn't mean to have all the business email tag on the end Sorry! John 40315


    Message 29


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:17:56 PM PST US
    From: linn Walters <pitts_pilot@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Re: Relative Value for Complete RV-10's?
    Reply not necessarily aimed at Pascal! Pascal wrote: > I see you questions are focused on resale. I have a few for you > however (but there are hundreds of questions I assume you have > reviewed before reaching the finacial piece) > - Do you have a strong desire to build a plane? 1250 or so hours of > your life is a lot of time to be spending for good resale value > - Does the finance minister like to fly- will she look forward to > going on trips that take too long to get to by auto? > - Do you understand that the price to build the plane is only the > start of the finances you'll be spending (Taxes, hangar, maintenance > (oil, etc) that can add up to 10% yearly. > > With that said, I have not started the building but I have a stronger > desire to build the plane than to fly it and one day will be ready to > sell it for another reason. I have no doubt I'll get my time and money > back when the plane is sold. Initially this may be so, but as the -10 becomes more available you'll be hard pressed to get value for your labor and maybe not the money you've spent. I had a small business brokering airplanes, and there are two kinds of folks out there. There are owners that are selling a 'gold bar' and buyers looking for a 'lead bar'. Very rarely are the two folks close to reality. There are those that will pay a nice price for a homebuilt because they have more money than time ..... but as the market sees more airplanes for sale then the competition for buyers heats up and sales prices fall. Profit (or breaking even) shouldn't be a part of the decision to build any homebuilt. Satisfaction and the ability to legally 'tweak' your pride and joy to improve it's looks, speed, or efficiency go a long way. Linn > Simply put my CFO supports the RV-10 because she knows I love to build > and have spent 7 years planning and saving for a kit plane. She also > really wants to take trips we simply can not go on due to distance and > time to get there, those two and not the resale works for me, if your > answer to the three questions is "yes" and your wife understands the > implication of your time building, the resale value should be an easy > sale for you. Just don't get caught up with the money and forget why > your building the plane to start with- unless of course it is as an > investment with hopes of making money on your labor and not for the > pleasure it will bring. > > Best of success with your propostion to the finance minister > > Pascal > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: James K Hovis <mailto:james.k.hovis@gmail.com> > To: rv10-list@matronics.com <mailto:rv10-list@matronics.com> > Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 11:28 AM > Subject: RV10-List: Relative Value for Complete RV-10's? > > As noted before I've been lurking absorbing the material before I > actually make the plunge and get a RV-10 kit. One question I'd > like to post to you here is what you think the relative value > for a completed RV-10 would be if one was to sell their aircraft > on the open market? I know that type of question would probably > lead to many different answers since each airplane built is a > little different from the next based on builder preferences and > such. For example, one guy could build a strictly VFR machine > while his buddy a few hangers away has a hard IFR capable machine. > What I'm thinking is a moderate to high hp engine (235 to 260 hp) > and probably light duty IFR capable ( i.e. basic gauges with maybe > one or two EFIS displays and engine monitor). If I can reasonably > assure the household finance minister that I can get a good return > on my investment, it might sway her towards my thinking. I've seen > one RV-10 offered for $220,000 and a partially finished a/c for > $175,000. I'd assume there hasn't been many sold since finished > birds haven't been flying long, but any info from the list is > helpful. > > Thanks. > > James K. Hovis >


    Message 30


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:04:24 PM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: Door fitting
    --> RV10-List message posted by: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com> I didn't see any other replies to this, so... Yes, I believe that you will be trimming considerably further than the scribe mark on some areas of the doors. In fact, you can get the gap nice and thin while fitting them, between the lip and inner door, but then if you cover the door with fabric you'll end up trimming even further. So my advice is to not paint that lip until you absolutely know the doors are done. If you trimmed too far, it's not the end of the world. The door seal will seal the air. If there's a lip there it should keep out water. So beyond that I think it's mostly cosmetic, so just try to make it nice and even. Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying do not archive rv10builder wrote: > For those of you that have fitted your doors... > > I am finding that a considerable amount of material must be removed from > the door perimeter to get them to where they'll recess into the canopy > opening. By considerable I mean that possibly 1/8 to 1/4 further > than the scribe line is removed. Is this normal? Just being cautious! > > Brian > 40308 (doors) > http://www.mykitlog.com/rv10builder




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv10-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV10-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv10-list
  • Browse RV10-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --