Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 03:30 AM - Re: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative engines, primer, and painting? (Wayne Edgerton)
2. 10:06 AM - intake alternate air (David McNeill)
3. 11:24 AM - Re: intake alternate air (Doerr, Ray R [NTK])
4. 11:57 AM - Re: intake alternate air (Rob Kermanj)
5. 12:06 PM - Re: intake alternate air (Tim Olson)
6. 12:10 PM - Re: alternative engines (Jesse Saint)
7. 12:12 PM - Re: Static port question (Bill DeRouchey)
8. 12:34 PM - Airflow Performance Purge Line (Tom Gesele)
9. 02:10 PM - Avidyne TAS600 (Chris Johnston)
10. 02:38 PM - Re: Avidyne TAS600 (Tim Olson)
11. 02:39 PM - Re: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative engines, primer, and painting? (Chris , Susie Darcy)
12. 04:09 PM - Re: Static port question (jdalton77)
13. 04:09 PM - Re: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative engines, primer, and painting? (jdalton77)
14. 04:15 PM - Re: intake alternate air (Neville Boyle)
15. 05:03 PM - Re: Airflow Performance Purge Line (Mike Kraus)
16. 05:56 PM - Re: Airflow Performance Purge Line (rv10builder)
17. 06:24 PM - Re: intake alternate air (Jesse Saint)
18. 06:29 PM - Re: Static port question (Larry Rosen)
19. 06:30 PM - Re: Airflow Performance Purge Line (Jesse Saint)
20. 07:03 PM - Matco Parking Break Installation (Larry Rosen)
21. 07:13 PM - Re: Airflow Performance Purge Line (rv10builder)
22. 07:33 PM - Re: Avidyne TAS600 (John W. Cox)
23. 08:18 PM - Re: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative engines, primer, and painting? (Rob Wright)
24. 09:49 PM - Re: Avidyne TAS600 (Tim Dawson-Townsend)
25. 10:59 PM - Re: Matco Parking Break Installation (Albert Gardner)
26. 11:07 PM - Birthday boy (Deems Davis)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative |
engines, primer, and painting?
Yes, use a rubber band :>}
do not archive
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | intake alternate air |
For those operating the IO540 D4A5, are you installing both hinged
alternate door on the front of the box and the emergency air door on the
bottom of the box?
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | intake alternate air |
I just installed the one on the bottom of the Box. This is
just in case the air filter is blocked by ice or anything else.
Thank You
Ray Doerr
N519RV (40250) 125 hours.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of David McNeill
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 12:05 PM
Subject: RV10-List: intake alternate air
For those operating the IO540 D4A5, are you installing both hinged
alternate door on the front of the box and the emergency air door on the
bottom of the box?
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: intake alternate air |
Just the emergency one for me.
Do not archive.
On Sep 5, 2006, at 1:04 PM, David McNeill wrote:
> For those operating the IO540 D4A5, are you installing both hinged
> alternate door on the front of the box and the emergency air door
> on the bottom of the box?
> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List_-
> ============================================================ _-
> forums.matronics.com_-
> ============================================================ _-
> ============================================================ _-
> contribution_-
> ===========================================================
>
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: intake alternate air |
--> RV10-List message posted by: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
Ditto on that.
Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying
do not archive
Doerr, Ray R [NTK] wrote:
> I just installed the one on the bottom of the Box. This is
> just in case the air filter is blocked by ice or anything else.
>
>
>
> Thank You
> *Ray Doerr*
>
> *N519RV (40250) 125 hours.*
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *David McNeill
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 05, 2006 12:05 PM
> *To:* rv10-list@matronics.com
> *Subject:* RV10-List: intake alternate air
>
>
>
> For those operating the IO540 D4A5, are you installing both hinged
> alternate door on the front of the box and the emergency air door on the
> bottom of the box?
>
> * *
>
> * *
>
> **
>
> **
>
> **
>
> **
>
> **
>
> **
>
> **
>
> **
>
> **
>
> **
>
> **
>
> **
>
> **
>
> **
>
> ****
>
> **
>
> **
>
> **
>
> **
>
> ****
>
> **
>
> * *
>
> *
>
>
> *
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: alternative engines |
--> RV10-List message posted by: "Jesse Saint" <jesse@itecusa.org>
On the engine, I just noticed that Van's is selling the experimental O-540
for $32,900 or so. If you are under huge budget constraints, that might
not be a bad way to go, which would also make it much easier to run Mogas.
Just a thought.
do not archive.
Jesse Saint
> --> RV10-List message posted by: James Hein <n8vim@arrl.net>
>
> I'll bite!
> I'm in the same position, that is I can't see spending $40k for a
> new engine, so I'm about 80% sure at this point I'm going to go with the
> Eggenfellner Subaru engine (H6) on my -10.
>
> I recently had an impressive ground demonstration (weather sucked
> for flying) of an RV-9A with the Egg 4-cylinder engine on it. Very
> impressive to say the least. Very quiet, lots of torque, and smooth...
> very smooth...
>
> As an engineer, I like the liquid cooling since tolerances can be
> much closer in the engine (and hence, less oil burning), etc.
>
> I won't need an engine for 2-3 years (due to financial reasons), so
> I'm keeping my options open right now.
>
> As for primer, I'm Alodining and Epoxy priming (PPG DP50LF)
> everything I can. My plane won't be a hangar queen with what I get paid
> around here! :) I am lucky in one respect though; Here in taxachusetts,
> would you beleive there is NO tax on airplanes or airplane parts?
>
> This is my opinion; What's yours?
>
> -Jim 40384, Drilling bottom wing skins...
>
> jdalton77 wrote:
>
>> H aha ha.
>>
>> Seriously, any way to not spend 40k on an engine?
>>
>>*
>>
>>
>>*
>>
>
>
Jesse Saint
I-TEC, Inc.
jesse@itecusa.org
www.itecusa.org
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Static port question |
Sorry no pictures - but -
I believe the only critical item is routing both ports up to the highest point
on the nearest bulkhead and then tee off for a single run to the panel. This
will drain the water back out the port and not into the instrumentation.
It would also be a good idea to perform a leak test and a flying test. Without
a correct static port no instrumentation on your panel can be be accurate.
A simple flying test, derived from a very few observations, is to open your static
line inside the cockpit during a flight. The altitude should increase 200
feet (or so). If it decreases then your static port is drawing a vacuum and
your airspeeds will be incorrectly low and your altitudes high.
Bill DeRouchey
N939SB, Flying
billderou@yahoo.com
Ben Westfall <rv10@sinkrate.com> wrote:
Does anyone have any pictures of how they ran their static port
tubing? Did you drill out holes for bushings in the ribs and what size did you
use? I went with the Vans pop-rivet kit because I never got around to researching
anything else and the time has come to install.
Any pointers would be appreciated.
-Ben Westfall
#40579 Tailcone still
Message 8
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Airflow Performance Purge Line |
--> RV10-List message posted by: Tom Gesele <tgesele@optonline.net>
Can anyone with an airflow performance fuel injection system installed on
the -10 tell me where they penetrated the firewall for the purge line. I'm
planning on installing a 45 deg bulkhead fitting in the same location
(opposite side) as the fitting for the fuel line and want to ensure there
are no interference issues with running the purge line from there. Also, if
anyone has a picture of the setup from the engine side that they could
forward, I'd appreciate it.
Thanks,
Tom Gesele #473
Message 9
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> RV10-List message posted by: "Chris Johnston" <CJohnston@popsound.com>
Hey all -
I'm considering putting the TAS600 active traffic system into my 10, so
I called up Avidyne and asked if they have an install kit that you can
buy. I'm working on the fuse, so now would be the time to install the
antennas and such. Also, it splits up the investment into a couple
smaller payments that don't look quite so bad. The part number for the
kit with all antennas and tray is 71-2026 for anyone else who is
interested. It's $3055 according to the guy at Avidyne. Total cost for
the system is $9900.
My question is - the sales rep said something about having to have an IA
inspect the install of the unit, or do the install. Really? He said
something like "it's the same thing you have to do after you install
your chelton..." Really? Someone has to inspect my installation of my
avionics? I certainly don't pretend to be very knowledgeable about
what's required legally when you build, but I'd have thought I would
have heard a bit about that. Anyone have any thoughts about this?
cj
#40410
(con)fuse(ed)
www.perfectlygoodairplane.net
Message 10
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Avidyne TAS600 |
--> RV10-List message posted by: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
I'm sure the guy you talked to just wasn't used to dealing
with the experimental world.
Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying
do not archive
Chris Johnston wrote:
> --> RV10-List message posted by: "Chris Johnston" <CJohnston@popsound.com>
>
> Hey all -
>
> I'm considering putting the TAS600 active traffic system into my 10, so
> I called up Avidyne and asked if they have an install kit that you can
> buy. I'm working on the fuse, so now would be the time to install the
> antennas and such. Also, it splits up the investment into a couple
> smaller payments that don't look quite so bad. The part number for the
> kit with all antennas and tray is 71-2026 for anyone else who is
> interested. It's $3055 according to the guy at Avidyne. Total cost for
> the system is $9900.
>
> My question is - the sales rep said something about having to have an IA
> inspect the install of the unit, or do the install. Really? He said
> something like "it's the same thing you have to do after you install
> your chelton..." Really? Someone has to inspect my installation of my
> avionics? I certainly don't pretend to be very knowledgeable about
> what's required legally when you build, but I'd have thought I would
> have heard a bit about that. Anyone have any thoughts about this?
>
> cj
> #40410
> (con)fuse(ed)
> www.perfectlygoodairplane.net
>
>
>
>
>
Message 11
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative |
engines, primer, and painting?
Yes we cannot aford 40 grand so we are going with an overhauled engine
saving about 15 grand!
Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: jdalton77
To: rv10-list@matronics.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: RV10-List: Since there is no one here can we talk about
alternative engines, primer, and painting?
I agree with your assessment. I'm looking forward to hearing how it
flies and how your demo flight goes. It will be interesting to hear how
220HP flies in the -10.
----- Original Message -----
From: millstees@ameritech.net
To: rv10-list@matronics.com
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: RV10-List: Since there is no one here can we talk about
alternative engines, primer, and painting?
I am going with the Eggenfellner H-6 turbocharged on my -10. I will
be receiving the engine in November, and am going to Florida for a demo
ride in Jan's H-6 equipped RV this coming weekend. The cost is $25K
firewall forward. Yes, I have heard all the negative press, but seems
to me, that there are lots of advantages that offset the minor loss in
horsepower, and that minor loss goes away at higher altitudes because of
the turbocharging. And, all those people who are criticizing the
engine, for the most part, have not flown it.
Steve Mills
40486
fuselage, Naperville Illinois
----- Original Message -----
From: jdalton77
To: rv10-list@matronics.com
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 4:06 PM
Subject: RV10-List: Since there is no one here can we talk about
alternative engines, primer, and painting?
H aha ha.
Seriously, any way to not spend 40k on an engine?
s.com/Navigator?RV10-List
s.com/Navigator?RV10-List
Message 12
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Static port question |
Since we're on the static port question, and for those of you in the
know, is there any significant reason, other than appearance, to go with
the SafeAir vs. the Vans "pop rivet?" For those who have installed the
Cleveland, how about that one. It sure looks nice and it's a lot
cheaper than the SafeAir.
----- Original Message -----
From: Bill DeRouchey
To: rv10-list@matronics.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: RV10-List: Static port question
Sorry no pictures - but -
I believe the only critical item is routing both ports up to the
highest point on the nearest bulkhead and then tee off for a single run
to the panel. This will drain the water back out the port and not into
the instrumentation.
It would also be a good idea to perform a leak test and a flying test.
Without a correct static port no instrumentation on your panel can be be
accurate.
A simple flying test, derived from a very few observations, is to open
your static line inside the cockpit during a flight. The altitude should
increase 200 feet (or so). If it decreases then your static port is
drawing a vacuum and your airspeeds will be incorrectly low and your
altitudes high.
Bill DeRouchey
N939SB, Flying
billderou@yahoo.com
Ben Westfall <rv10@sinkrate.com> wrote:
Does anyone have any pictures of how they ran their static port
tubing? Did you drill out holes for bushings in the ribs and what size
did you use? I went with the Van's pop-rivet kit because I never got
around to researching anything else and the time has come to install.
Any pointers would be appreciated.
-Ben Westfall
--> http://forums.matronics.com
http://wiki.matronics.com
===========
Message 13
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative |
engines, primer, and painting?
I wish I knew how to do that - I'm not an engine junkie. I can do the
rest, including all the electronics no problem, but I'm no expert with a
piston.
----- Original Message -----
From: Chris , Susie Darcy
To: rv10-list@matronics.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: RV10-List: Since there is no one here can we talk about
alternative engines, primer, and painting?
Yes we cannot aford 40 grand so we are going with an overhauled engine
saving about 15 grand!
Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: jdalton77
To: rv10-list@matronics.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: RV10-List: Since there is no one here can we talk about
alternative engines, primer, and painting?
I agree with your assessment. I'm looking forward to hearing how it
flies and how your demo flight goes. It will be interesting to hear how
220HP flies in the -10.
----- Original Message -----
From: millstees@ameritech.net
To: rv10-list@matronics.com
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: RV10-List: Since there is no one here can we talk
about alternative engines, primer, and painting?
I am going with the Eggenfellner H-6 turbocharged on my -10. I
will be receiving the engine in November, and am going to Florida for a
demo ride in Jan's H-6 equipped RV this coming weekend. The cost is
$25K firewall forward. Yes, I have heard all the negative press, but
seems to me, that there are lots of advantages that offset the minor
loss in horsepower, and that minor loss goes away at higher altitudes
because of the turbocharging. And, all those people who are criticizing
the engine, for the most part, have not flown it.
Steve Mills
40486
fuselage, Naperville Illinois
----- Original Message -----
From: jdalton77
To: rv10-list@matronics.com
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 4:06 PM
Subject: RV10-List: Since there is no one here can we talk about
alternative engines, primer, and painting?
H aha ha.
Seriously, any way to not spend 40k on an engine?
s.com/Navigator?RV10-List
s.com/Navigator?RV10-List
s.com/Navigator?RV10-List
Message 14
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | intake alternate air |
David I installed both mainly because I had the alternate air installed
and the original magnetic filter bypass when the AD for the magnetic
filter bypass came I ended up with both .If I was doing it again I would
only fit the filter bypass.
Neville Boyle
VHNVL 14.5 hours
Do Not Archive
-----Original Message-----
From: David McNeill [mailto:dlm46007@cox.net]
Sent: Wednesday, 6 September 2006 3:05 AM
Subject: RV10-List: intake alternate air
For those operating the IO540 D4A5, are you installing both hinged
alternate door on the front of the box and the emergency air door on the
bottom of the box?
Message 15
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Airflow Performance Purge Line |
--> RV10-List message posted by: "Mike Kraus" <n223rv@wolflakeairport.net>
Just did this last week. I ran a second 45 degree fitting below the
current fuel 45 fitting on the firewall. Ran the line down the right
side of the tunnel, and put in a 90 degree bend into the left tank line.
I plan on Adel clamping the line to the right side wall of the tunnel
soon. I also had to finagle a #4 line into a #6 line with some fitting
magic, but it was no big deal (the purge line is #4).
-Mike Kraus
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tom Gesele
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 3:33 PM
Subject: RV10-List: Airflow Performance Purge Line
--> RV10-List message posted by: Tom Gesele <tgesele@optonline.net>
Can anyone with an airflow performance fuel injection system installed
on the -10 tell me where they penetrated the firewall for the purge
line. I'm planning on installing a 45 deg bulkhead fitting in the same
location (opposite side) as the fitting for the fuel line and want to
ensure there are no interference issues with running the purge line from
there. Also, if anyone has a picture of the setup from the engine side
that they could forward, I'd appreciate it.
Thanks,
Tom Gesele #473
Message 16
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Airflow Performance Purge Line |
--> RV10-List message posted by: rv10builder <rv10builder@bellsouth.net>
Here is how I routed mine...
http://www.mykitlog.com/users/display_log.php?user=rv10builder&project=7&category=501&log=15056&row=19
Brian
40308
Tom Gesele wrote:
> --> RV10-List message posted by: Tom Gesele <tgesele@optonline.net>
>
> Can anyone with an airflow performance fuel injection system installed on
> the -10 tell me where they penetrated the firewall for the purge line. I'm
> planning on installing a 45 deg bulkhead fitting in the same location
> (opposite side) as the fitting for the fuel line and want to ensure there
> are no interference issues with running the purge line from there. Also, if
> anyone has a picture of the setup from the engine side that they could
> forward, I'd appreciate it.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom Gesele #473
>
>
>
> .
>
>
Message 17
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | intake alternate air |
We've done both and haven't used either in over 300 hours of flying yet, but
haven't had an emergency yet.
Jesse Saint
I-TEC, Inc.
jesse@itecusa.org
www.itecusa.org
W: 352-465-4545
C: 352-427-0285
_____
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of David McNeill
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 1:05 PM
Subject: RV10-List: intake alternate air
For those operating the IO540 D4A5, are you installing both hinged alternate
door on the front of the box and the emergency air door on the bottom of the
box?
--
Message 18
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Static port question |
--> RV10-List message posted by: Larry Rosen <LarryRosen@comcast.net>
*You can see how Deems the static tubing here
<http://www.deemsrv10.com/album/Sec%2035%20Access%20covers%20and%20Floor%20panels/index.html>
look at pictures DSC03048, 49 & 50.
*
Message 19
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Airflow Performance Purge Line |
--> RV10-List message posted by: "Jesse Saint" <jesse@itecusa.org>
Beautiful layout. With the selector on the right tank and the purged fuel
into the left line between the tank and the selector, you force the fuel
back into the tank without running a complete return line. Why did you not
just use a "T" with flared ends instead of pipe threads and pipe-to-flare
fittings?
Do not archive?
Jesse Saint
I-TEC, Inc.
jesse@itecusa.org
www.itecusa.org
W: 352-465-4545
C: 352-427-0285
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of rv10builder
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 8:55 PM
Subject: Re: RV10-List: Airflow Performance Purge Line
--> RV10-List message posted by: rv10builder <rv10builder@bellsouth.net>
Here is how I routed mine...
http://www.mykitlog.com/users/display_log.php?user=rv10builder&project=7&cat
egory=501&log=15056&row=19
Brian
40308
Tom Gesele wrote:
> --> RV10-List message posted by: Tom Gesele <tgesele@optonline.net>
>
> Can anyone with an airflow performance fuel injection system installed on
> the -10 tell me where they penetrated the firewall for the purge line. I'm
> planning on installing a 45 deg bulkhead fitting in the same location
> (opposite side) as the fitting for the fuel line and want to ensure there
> are no interference issues with running the purge line from there. Also,
if
> anyone has a picture of the setup from the engine side that they could
> forward, I'd appreciate it.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom Gesele #473
>
>
>
> .
>
>
--
--
Message 20
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Matco Parking Break Installation |
--> RV10-List message posted by: Larry Rosen <LarryRosen@comcast.net>
Many have installed the Matco parking break valve on the inside of the
firewall like
Deemes
<http://www.deemsrv10.com/album/Sec%2036%20Brake%20Lines/slides/DSC02527.html>
William <http://wcurtis.nerv10.com/08fuselage/fuselage03w.html>
Scott <http://scottandranae.smugmug.com/gallery/425029/2/17824900>
Has anyone routed / connected up the control cable yet?
How did you do it? Any pictures?
--
Larry Rosen
RV-10 #356
http://lrosen.nerv10.com
Message 21
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Airflow Performance Purge Line |
--> RV10-List message posted by: rv10builder <rv10builder@bellsouth.net>
Thanks Jesse - works exactly as you described. Good point about the
fitting, just a matter of mating together two sizes of tubing. In the
end I really just copied Dan Checkoway's installation:
(http://www.rvproject.com/20030516.html). - Thanks Dan if you're listening!
Jesse Saint wrote:
> --> RV10-List message posted by: "Jesse Saint" <jesse@itecusa.org>
>
> Beautiful layout. With the selector on the right tank and the purged fuel
> into the left line between the tank and the selector, you force the fuel
> back into the tank without running a complete return line. Why did you not
> just use a "T" with flared ends instead of pipe threads and pipe-to-flare
> fittings?
>
> Do not archive?
>
> Jesse Saint
> I-TEC, Inc.
> jesse@itecusa.org
> www.itecusa.org
> W: 352-465-4545
> C: 352-427-0285
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of rv10builder
> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 8:55 PM
> To: rv10-list@matronics.com
> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Airflow Performance Purge Line
>
> --> RV10-List message posted by: rv10builder <rv10builder@bellsouth.net>
>
> Here is how I routed mine...
>
> http://www.mykitlog.com/users/display_log.php?user=rv10builder&project=7&cat
> egory=501&log=15056&row=19
>
> Brian
> 40308
>
> Tom Gesele wrote:
>
>> --> RV10-List message posted by: Tom Gesele <tgesele@optonline.net>
>>
>> Can anyone with an airflow performance fuel injection system installed on
>> the -10 tell me where they penetrated the firewall for the purge line. I'm
>> planning on installing a 45 deg bulkhead fitting in the same location
>> (opposite side) as the fitting for the fuel line and want to ensure there
>> are no interference issues with running the purge line from there. Also,
>>
> if
>
>> anyone has a picture of the setup from the engine side that they could
>> forward, I'd appreciate it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tom Gesele #473
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Message 22
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> RV10-List message posted by: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox@pacificnw.com>
The IA must be thinking that because of the more than 600 units sold and
the exceptional quality of such birds as Debbie's, then it must be a
certificated production aircraft. Production Certificateds would
require such a modification process requiring an IA signature on the 337
form.
I think your approach and investment will pay dividends. I believe you
are good to go, and I for one will be thrilled to hear your journey.
John Cox
Do not Archive
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Chris
Johnston
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 2:10 PM
Subject: RV10-List: Avidyne TAS600
--> RV10-List message posted by: "Chris Johnston"
<CJohnston@popsound.com>
Hey all -
I'm considering putting the TAS600 active traffic system into my 10, so
I called up Avidyne and asked if they have an install kit that you can
buy. I'm working on the fuse, so now would be the time to install the
antennas and such. Also, it splits up the investment into a couple
smaller payments that don't look quite so bad. The part number for the
kit with all antennas and tray is 71-2026 for anyone else who is
interested. It's $3055 according to the guy at Avidyne. Total cost for
the system is $9900.
My question is - the sales rep said something about having to have an IA
inspect the install of the unit, or do the install. Really? He said
something like "it's the same thing you have to do after you install
your chelton..." Really? Someone has to inspect my installation of my
avionics? I certainly don't pretend to be very knowledgeable about
what's required legally when you build, but I'd have thought I would
have heard a bit about that. Anyone have any thoughts about this?
cj
#40410
(con)fuse(ed)
www.perfectlygoodairplane.net
Message 23
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative |
engines, primer, and painting?
How about $32K for a first run IO-540 with new cylinders, EIS ignition, and
overhaul?
Rob Wright
#392
Closed up Left Wing tonight...
_____
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of jdalton77
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 4:06 PM
Subject: RV10-List: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative
engines, primer, and painting?
H aha ha.
Seriously, any way to not spend 40k on an engine?
Message 24
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Chris:
I concur with Tim. Do you have the name of who you talked to? I'll be
sure to set them straight . . .
We've got a TAS system going in our -10 and Debbie Dewey's already got
one flying, I think . . .
Tim D-T
40025
________________________________
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com on behalf of Chris Johnston
Sent: Tue 9/5/2006 5:09 PM
Subject: RV10-List: Avidyne TAS600
--> RV10-List message posted by: "Chris Johnston"
<CJohnston@popsound.com>
Hey all -
I'm considering putting the TAS600 active traffic system into my 10, so
I called up Avidyne and asked if they have an install kit that you can
buy. I'm working on the fuse, so now would be the time to install the
antennas and such. Also, it splits up the investment into a couple
smaller payments that don't look quite so bad. The part number for the
kit with all antennas and tray is 71-2026 for anyone else who is
interested. It's $3055 according to the guy at Avidyne. Total cost for
the system is $9900.
My question is - the sales rep said something about having to have an IA
inspect the install of the unit, or do the install. Really? He said
something like "it's the same thing you have to do after you install
your chelton..." Really? Someone has to inspect my installation of my
avionics? I certainly don't pretend to be very knowledgeable about
what's required legally when you build, but I'd have thought I would
have heard a bit about that. Anyone have any thoughts about this?
cj
#40410
(con)fuse(ed)
www.perfectlygoodairplane.net
Message 25
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Matco Parking Break Installation |
Here is one way. The kit included a bracket for the TruTrak pitch servo
that
didn't work as well as the one TruTrak provided with the pitch servo
they
sent me so I used it to make the bracket that holds the push/pull cable
that
those excellent guys at Spruce sent me.
Albert Gardner
RV-10 #422
Yuma, AZ
--> RV10-List message posted by: Larry Rosen <LarryRosen@comcast.net>
Many have installed the Matco parking break valve on the inside of the
firewall Has anyone routed / connected up the control cable yet?
How did you do it? Any pictures?
Larry Rosen
RV-10 #356
http://lrosen.nerv10.com
Message 26
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> RV10-List message posted by: Deems Davis <deemsdavis@cox.net>
Rumor has it that Rick Sked ce;ebrated a borthday today!
Happy B'Day Rick !!!!
Deems
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|