RV10-List Digest Archive

Sat 12/09/06


Total Messages Posted: 22



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:07 AM - Re: Another Alternative Engine? (Rodger Todd)
     2. 05:49 AM - Re: Another Alternative Engine? (Tim Olson)
     3. 06:10 AM - Re: Paint experience (Tim Olson)
     4. 06:27 AM - Re: Another Alternative Engine? (Mark Ritter)
     5. 06:41 AM - Re: Another Alternative Engine? (PJ Seipel)
     6. 06:50 AM - Re: Paint experience (James Hein)
     7. 07:00 AM - Re: Paint experience (Rodger Todd)
     8. 07:08 AM - Re: Another Alternative Engine? (Rodger Todd)
     9. 07:27 AM - Re: Another Alternative Engine? (Jesse Saint)
    10. 08:07 AM - Re: Hot Starts Lycoming? (C Smith)
    11. 08:33 AM - Re: Paint experience (Brian Douglas)
    12. 08:36 AM - Re: Hot Starts Lycoming? (Tim Olson)
    13. 09:28 AM - Re: Hot Starts Lycoming? (Mark Ritter)
    14. 09:55 AM - Engine analyzer/monitor (Kelly McMullen)
    15. 01:09 PM - Re: Hot Starts Lycoming? (Jesse Saint)
    16. 01:12 PM - Re: Hot Starts Lycoming? (C Smith)
    17. 02:05 PM - Gear leg fairings (Chris Hukill)
    18. 03:05 PM - Re: Hot Starts Lycoming? (Tim Olson)
    19. 04:16 PM - Re: Hot Starts Lycoming? (Kelly McMullen)
    20. 04:19 PM - Re: Another Alternative Engine? (johngoodman)
    21. 06:31 PM - Re: Paint experience (RV Builder (Michael Sausen))
    22. 06:34 PM - Fuse Part (Rob Wright)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:07:53 AM PST US
    From: Rodger Todd <rj_todd@yahoo.co.uk>
    Subject: Re: Another Alternative Engine?
    I don't consider myself an expert - well not in this field anyway, but when I first started looking at the -10 it was obvious to me that the SMA230 would be eminently suitable. I contacted both the local agent and SMA in France to be told two things. Firstly they were only interested in supplying complete FWF kits which only they would install and secondly they were developing a higher powered version which eventually would be suitable for us (higher powered being 350+hp). That left me wondering about their marketing and also their ability to read (when did 260hp max 350hp?) My take is that they are not interested in any way in the experimental market. Since then I have heard that they are still having prop problems due to unevenness in the cycle - can't remember the source but it was printed. I regretfully will be installing some form of Lycosaurus which it's ravenous appetite and dislike for hot starting. If it's not too early, received first card 1 month ago, Merry Christmas to all, Rodger --- Jeff Carpenter <jeff@westcottpress.com> wrote: > <jeff@westcottpress.com> > > http://www.flyjeta.com/tech.htm > > What say you engine experts? > > > Click on > about > provided > www.buildersbooks.com > Admin. > > browse > Subscriptions page, > FAQ, > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > > > > > ___________________________________________________________ All new Yahoo! Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity and ease of use." - PC Magazine http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:49:40 AM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: Another Alternative Engine?
    Hi Rodger, I had thought of the SMA too, but hearing of the troubles they had and the high cost turned me off as well. For what it's worth, I've found that at least with the Lightspeed ignition on one side, Hot Start issues are a myth, once you learn how to do them. I had a couple of starts go bad early on, but now I can get it started right away both hot or cold, and it's an injected engine. So don't let hot starts scare you away. Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying do not archive Rodger Todd wrote: > > I don't consider myself an expert - well not in this > field anyway, but when I first started looking at the > -10 it was obvious to me that the SMA230 would be > eminently suitable. I contacted both the local agent > and SMA in France to be told two things. Firstly they > were only interested in supplying complete FWF kits > which only they would install and secondly they were > developing a higher powered version which eventually > would be suitable for us (higher powered being > 350+hp). That left me wondering about their marketing > and also their ability to read (when did 260hp max > 350hp?) > > My take is that they are not interested in any way in > the experimental market. Since then I have heard that > they are still having prop problems due to unevenness > in the cycle - can't remember the source but it was > printed. > > I regretfully will be installing some form of > Lycosaurus which it's ravenous appetite and dislike > for hot starting. > > If it's not too early, received first card 1 month > ago, Merry Christmas to all, > > Rodger > --- Jeff Carpenter <jeff@westcottpress.com> wrote: > >> <jeff@westcottpress.com> >> >> http://www.flyjeta.com/tech.htm >> >> What say you engine experts? >> >> >> Click on >> about >> provided >> www.buildersbooks.com >> Admin. >> >> browse >> Subscriptions page, >> FAQ, >> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________ > All new Yahoo! Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity and ease of use." - PC Magazine > http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html > > > >


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:10:40 AM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: Paint experience
    Reply inline... Rob Wright wrote: > How much experience did you (anyone) have prior to doing your own > priming and then paint? I need to start planning. For the simplicity > of the fuse interior, it seems that I can both prime and paint with an > inexpensive gun (<$50 or<$75), then I can save up for a higher quality > exterior gun after I fly for a while. > > Questions: > > Hows the learning curve? > The learning curve question is a very tough question. It could vary greatly for people. I do believe that those who are priming their own parts can benefit from the time spent priming, however. My advice is if you don't feel really comfortable, have someone come over who is when you get to the real painting, and give you a hand with some parts, or at least critique you. Most people will know SOMEONE who they can call who's painted things before, even if it's a friend of a friend. So talk about it with those close to you and see who knows who. Even if it cost you a couple hundred bucks for an off-duty auto body person for a day, you'd learn things....and a professional paid paint job will still be many THOUSANDS more. > > How many practice pieces before committing? > Painting isn't too bad when you get the theory down and have some practice. After doing the plane I painted and matched a couple of car pieces too, including clearcoat. The only thing that didn't turn out perfect is I did it in a dusty garage and got some dirt in the clearcoat. If you have someone get you started, there's no reason that you can't do a reasonable job. I'll never pay for a car to be painted again, from what I've found now. So now my wife can nail all the deer she wants. ;) > > > What about gravity vs. standard fed guns? Meaning, how easy is it to > manipulate the gun to all the nooks and crannys with such a big cup > without losing paint flow? > > Here's a good suggestion for you. I think the pressure pot guns would do good for people on the main color, but we didn't use them. But, the guy who helped me had a good trick. For the Sata guns we used, they make a plastic liner disposable paint cup that has it's own integral filter. It was awesome for doing even the undersides of things, because as the paint got used, the liner collapsed, keeping it void of air for the most part. This eliminated the issue. They weren't too expensive, and it was nice to just throw away the liners when done with a session. Again, a small cost compared to paying a pro. Incidently, keeping a paint job simple (which is what I consider mine to be), can help make it easier. One large single color base followed by 1 or 2 stripe colors isn't really a big deal. Actually, the color stripes are even easier to do on top of the base, and I found the base coat clearcoat to be even easier to work with in general. But I am glad I went single stage on the main color. > > Recommend pint or quart cup to cover the interior, or go with a touch-up > gun? I see on Tims site that he only used about a quart total for the > whole inside. > The interior is harder to maneuver around than the exterior. I now own, AFTER the fact, a nice SATA MiniJet with a smaller cup that would be great for the small areas on the interior. I think you could use either, but you'll want to put any inline hose filters somewhere upstream a ways so the hose connects directly to the gun with a 10' whip instead of quick connectors. That makes it easier to flex around. I don't know what I'd do if I could do it all over again. Probably use the minijet on the interior, since it's such a small area. Either way, when you paint the plane, you're going to mix up larger batches of paint than what one gun cup will hold. You need to be able to just pour more into the gun and carry on quick, in order to keep painting along the wet edge on the larger parts. The good news is, if you can't keep up and keep the edge wet, you can back up to a seam or some spot and start that panel with a new edge. Anyway, you just don't want to have to stop and mix more paint during a large shoot if possible. It also might be nice, if you have the time and space to do it, to do a couple major pieces at a time. Like the day you do the fuselage, don't do anything else. Do the wings another day. Then do the small parts another day. That helps break things up. For my next plane, I may even just plastic line my garage and do the entire thing there, as the color striped we did there turned out fine. I'd just need to get some blower/filter stuff set up but I could do that cheap enough to still make the entire job a bargain over a paid-for pro job. Mine isn't the prettiest plane out there, but it still seems to look good to most people from what I can tell. Tim > > > Thanks, > > > > Rob Wright > > #392 > > Fuse Access Covers > > *


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:27:06 AM PST US
    From: "Mark Ritter" <mritter509@msn.com>
    Subject: Re: Another Alternative Engine?
    Rodger, I have the same setup on my Lyc. IO-540 (Aero Sport engine) as Tim (Lightspeed and Mag) and agree hot starts are a non-issue. Mark (N410MR) >From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com> >To: rv10-list@matronics.com >Subject: Re: RV10-List: Another Alternative Engine? >Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2006 07:47:38 -0600 > > >Hi Rodger, >I had thought of the SMA too, but hearing of the troubles >they had and the high cost turned me off as well. > >For what it's worth, I've found that at least with the >Lightspeed ignition on one side, Hot Start issues are >a myth, once you learn how to do them. I had a couple >of starts go bad early on, but now I can get it started >right away both hot or cold, and it's an injected >engine. So don't let hot starts scare you away. > >Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying >do not archive > > >Rodger Todd wrote: >> >>I don't consider myself an expert - well not in this >>field anyway, but when I first started looking at the >>-10 it was obvious to me that the SMA230 would be >>eminently suitable. I contacted both the local agent >>and SMA in France to be told two things. Firstly they >>were only interested in supplying complete FWF kits >>which only they would install and secondly they were >>developing a higher powered version which eventually >>would be suitable for us (higher powered being >>350+hp). That left me wondering about their marketing >>and also their ability to read (when did 260hp max >>350hp?) >> >>My take is that they are not interested in any way in >>the experimental market. Since then I have heard that >>they are still having prop problems due to unevenness >>in the cycle - can't remember the source but it was >>printed. >> >>I regretfully will be installing some form of >>Lycosaurus which it's ravenous appetite and dislike >>for hot starting. >> >>If it's not too early, received first card 1 month >>ago, Merry Christmas to all, >> >>Rodger >>--- Jeff Carpenter <jeff@westcottpress.com> wrote: >> >>><jeff@westcottpress.com> >>> >>>http://www.flyjeta.com/tech.htm >>> >>>What say you engine experts? >>> >>> >>>Click on >>>about >>>provided >>>www.buildersbooks.com >>>Admin. >>> >>>browse >>>Subscriptions page, >>>FAQ, >>>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>___________________________________________________________ All new Yahoo! >>Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity and ease of use." - >>PC Magazine http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html >> >> >> >> > > _________________________________________________________________ Get free, personalized commercial-free online radio with MSN Radio powered by Pandora http://radio.msn.com/?icid=T002MSN03A07001


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:41:36 AM PST US
    From: PJ Seipel <seipel@seznam.cz>
    Subject: Re: Another Alternative Engine?
    SMA has been around for a long time. I looked at them when I was considering DeltaHawk and others. They will not sell to the experimental market. Only way you're going to get an engine from them, at least in the next five to ten years, is if you bring them a Cessna 182 and get it retrofitted for $80K. Their entire focus is on the certified GA market. PJ RV-10 #40032 Jeff Carpenter wrote: > > http://www.flyjeta.com/tech.htm > > What say you engine experts? > >


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:50:19 AM PST US
    From: James Hein <n8vim@arrl.net>
    Subject: Re: Paint experience
    Rob, I use a Paasche airbrush for all the small pieces (anything other than a skin), which keeps overspray down, wastes less paint, and lets you work a boit slower this allowing you more precision in priming. For the skins, it is too small, so I use a regular automotive touchup gun, but the amount of paint that gets in the air is horrible compared to the airbrush. If you do go the airbrush route, make sure to get a few 3 or 6 oz. spray jars and a large needle to spray the heavy paints. I use the airbrush at 70psi. Oh, if you screw up a small part during priming, just toss the part in a bucket of Acetone or MEK and it will remove it so you can try again later. (after a week though, the PPG Epoxy paint won't dissolve!) I am using PPG DP50LF Epoxy primer, with DP401 Catalyst. -Jim 40384 (must..... get..... back.... to..... riveting..... bottom.... wing.... skins.... ! ) Rob Wright wrote: > How much experience did you (anyone) have prior to doing your own > priming and then paint? I need to start planning. For the simplicity > of the fuse interior, it seems that I can both prime and paint with an > inexpensive gun (<$50 or<$75), then I can save up for a higher quality > exterior gun after I fly for a while. > > Questions: > > Hows the learning curve? > > How many practice pieces before committing? > > What about gravity vs. standard fed guns? Meaning, how easy is it to > manipulate the gun to all the nooks and crannys with such a big cup > without losing paint flow? > > Recommend pint or quart cup to cover the interior, or go with a > touch-up gun? I see on Tims site that he only used about a quart > total for the whole inside. > > Thanks, > > Rob Wright > > #392 > > Fuse Access Covers >


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:00:34 AM PST US
    From: Rodger Todd <rj_todd@yahoo.co.uk>
    Subject: Re: Paint experience
    Hi Tim, "they make a plastic liner disposable paint cup that has it's own integral filter. It was awesome for doing even the undersides of things, because as the paint got used, the liner collapsed, keeping it void of air for the most part" I think you're refering to the 3M PPS system here which is available for most guns. I'm in the process of getting it for my Sata Minijet 4 - been on order for over two months, the distributor is currently waiting for the mini-cups. See http://multimedia.mmm.com/mws/mediawebserver.dyn?6666660Zjcf6lVs6EVs66SeggCOrrrrQ- or if this doesn't work then go to the 3M site and search for PPS. I think some one here mentioned this some months ago. Best wishes, Rodger --- Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com> wrote: > <Tim@MyRV10.com> > > Reply inline... > > > Rob Wright wrote: > > How much experience did you (anyone) have prior to > doing your own > > priming and then paint? I need to start planning. > For the simplicity > > of the fuse interior, it seems that I can both > prime and paint with an > > inexpensive gun (<$50 or<$75), then I can save up > for a higher quality > > exterior gun after I fly for a while. > > > > Questions: > > > > Hows the learning curve? > > > > The learning curve question is a very tough > question. It could vary > greatly for people. I do believe that those who are > priming their own > parts can benefit from the time spent priming, > however. My advice is > if you don't feel really comfortable, have someone > come over who is > when you get to the real painting, and give you a > hand with some parts, > or at least critique you. Most people will know > SOMEONE who they > can call who's painted things before, even if it's a > friend of a > friend. So talk about it with those close to you > and see who > knows who. Even if it cost you a couple hundred > bucks for an off-duty > auto body person for a day, you'd learn > things....and a professional > paid paint job will still be many THOUSANDS more. > > > > > > How many practice pieces before committing? > > > > Painting isn't too bad when you get the theory down > and have some > practice. After doing the plane I painted and > matched a couple of > car pieces too, including clearcoat. The only thing > that didn't > turn out perfect is I did it in a dusty garage and > got some dirt > in the clearcoat. If you have someone get you > started, there's no > reason that you can't do a reasonable job. I'll > never pay for a > car to be painted again, from what I've found now. > So now my > wife can nail all the deer she wants. ;) > > > > > > > What about gravity vs. standard fed guns? Meaning, > how easy is it to > > manipulate the gun to all the nooks and crannys > with such a big cup > > without losing paint flow? > > > > > > Here's a good suggestion for you. I think the > pressure pot guns would > do good for people on the main color, but we didn't > use them. But, > the guy who helped me had a good trick. For the > Sata guns we used, > they make a plastic liner disposable paint cup that > has it's own > integral filter. It was awesome for doing even the > undersides > of things, because as the paint got used, the liner > collapsed, keeping > it void of air for the most part. This eliminated > the issue. They > weren't too expensive, and it was nice to just throw > away the liners > when done with a session. Again, a small cost > compared to paying > a pro. > > Incidently, keeping a paint job simple (which is > what I consider mine > to be), can help make it easier. One large single > color base followed > by 1 or 2 stripe colors isn't really a big deal. > Actually, the color > stripes are even easier to do on top of the base, > and I found the base > coat clearcoat to be even easier to work with in > general. But I am > glad I went single stage on the main color. > > > > > > > Recommend pint or quart cup to cover the interior, > or go with a touch-up > > gun? I see on Tims site that he only used about > a quart total for the > > whole inside. > > > > The interior is harder to maneuver around than the > exterior. I now own, > AFTER the fact, a nice SATA MiniJet with a smaller > cup that would be > great for the small areas on the interior. I think > you could use > either, but you'll want to put any inline hose > filters somewhere > upstream a ways so the hose connects directly to the > gun with a 10' > whip instead of quick connectors. That makes it > easier to flex > around. I don't know what I'd do if I could do it > all over again. > Probably use the minijet on the interior, since it's > such a small > area. > > Either way, when you paint the plane, you're going > to mix up larger > batches of paint than what one gun cup will hold. > You need to be able > to just pour more into the gun and carry on quick, > in order to keep > painting along the wet edge on the larger parts. > The good news is, > if you can't keep up and keep the edge wet, you can > back up to a > seam or some spot and start that panel with a new > edge. Anyway, > you just don't want to have to stop and mix more > paint during a large > shoot if possible. It also might be nice, if you > have the time > and space to do it, to do a couple major pieces at a > time. Like > the day you do the fuselage, don't do anything else. > Do the wings > another day. Then do the small parts another day. > That helps > break things up. > > For my next plane, I may even just plastic line my > garage and do > the entire thing there, as the color striped we did > there turned > out fine. I'd just need to get some blower/filter > stuff set up > but I could do that cheap enough to still make the > entire job > a bargain over a paid-for pro job. Mine isn't the > prettiest > plane out there, but it still seems to look good to > most > people from what I can tell. > > Tim > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Rob Wright > > > > #392 > > > > Fuse Access Covers > > > > * > > > Click on > about > provided > === message truncated == ___________________________________________________________ All new Yahoo! Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity and ease of use." - PC Magazine http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:08:39 AM PST US
    From: Rodger Todd <rj_todd@yahoo.co.uk>
    Subject: Re: Another Alternative Engine?
    Thanks to both Mark and Tim for the thumbs up on hot starts. Tim knows that I live in an area where hot starts are an everyday necessity and I'm glad to hear that this is one less worry. Rodger --- Mark Ritter <mritter509@msn.com> wrote: > <mritter509@msn.com> > > Rodger, > > I have the same setup on my Lyc. IO-540 (Aero Sport > engine) as Tim > (Lightspeed and Mag) and agree hot starts are a > non-issue. > > Mark (N410MR) > > > > > >From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com> > >To: rv10-list@matronics.com > >Subject: Re: RV10-List: Another Alternative Engine? > >Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2006 07:47:38 -0600 > > > <Tim@MyRV10.com> > > > >Hi Rodger, > >I had thought of the SMA too, but hearing of the > troubles > >they had and the high cost turned me off as well. > > > >For what it's worth, I've found that at least with > the > >Lightspeed ignition on one side, Hot Start issues > are > >a myth, once you learn how to do them. I had a > couple > >of starts go bad early on, but now I can get it > started > >right away both hot or cold, and it's an injected > >engine. So don't let hot starts scare you away. > > > >Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying > >do not archive > > > > > >Rodger Todd wrote: > <rj_todd@yahoo.co.uk> > >> > >>I don't consider myself an expert - well not in > this > >>field anyway, but when I first started looking at > the > >>-10 it was obvious to me that the SMA230 would be > >>eminently suitable. I contacted both the local > agent > >>and SMA in France to be told two things. Firstly > they > >>were only interested in supplying complete FWF > kits > >>which only they would install and secondly they > were > >>developing a higher powered version which > eventually > >>would be suitable for us (higher powered being > >>350+hp). That left me wondering about their > marketing > >>and also their ability to read (when did 260hp max > > >>350hp?) > >> > >>My take is that they are not interested in any way > in > >>the experimental market. Since then I have heard > that > >>they are still having prop problems due to > unevenness > >>in the cycle - can't remember the source but it > was > >>printed. > >> > >>I regretfully will be installing some form of > >>Lycosaurus which it's ravenous appetite and > dislike > >>for hot starting. > >> > >>If it's not too early, received first card 1 month > >>ago, Merry Christmas to all, > >> > >>Rodger > >>--- Jeff Carpenter <jeff@westcottpress.com> wrote: > >> > >>><jeff@westcottpress.com> > >>> > >>>http://www.flyjeta.com/tech.htm > >>> > >>>What say you engine experts? > >>> > >>> > >>>Click on > >>>about > >>>provided > >>>www.buildersbooks.com > >>>Admin. > >>> > >>>browse > >>>Subscriptions page, > >>>FAQ, > >>>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>___________________________________________________________ > All new Yahoo! > >>Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its > simplicity and ease of use." - > >>PC Magazine > http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get free, personalized commercial-free online radio > with MSN Radio powered > by Pandora > http://radio.msn.com/?icid=T002MSN03A07001 > > > > Click on > about > provided > www.buildersbooks.com > Admin. > > browse > Subscriptions page, > FAQ, > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > > > > > ___________________________________________________________ All new Yahoo! Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity and ease of use." - PC Magazine http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:27:59 AM PST US
    From: "Jesse Saint" <jesse@itecusa.org>
    Subject: Another Alternative Engine?
    I guess ravenous appetite could be debated as well. Yes, you can burn 26gph at sea level running rich on take-off, but you can also cruise burning 7gph with TAS upwards of 150Kts, or 13.5gph at 176Kts. That seems to me to be pretty economical. Another issue on hot starts is there is a fuel injection system that has a purge valve so you can pull a lever, run the boost pump, and flush the hot fuel out of the system. With 2 mags hot start takes a little longer, but it isn't a big deal IMHO. A Slick Start helps with this also, although they have stopped selling it, but I hear they are coming out with a new version sometime early next year. Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. jesse@itecusa.org www.itecusa.org W: 352-465-4545 C: 352-427-0285 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rodger Todd Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2006 8:06 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Another Alternative Engine? I don't consider myself an expert - well not in this field anyway, but when I first started looking at the -10 it was obvious to me that the SMA230 would be eminently suitable. I contacted both the local agent and SMA in France to be told two things. Firstly they were only interested in supplying complete FWF kits which only they would install and secondly they were developing a higher powered version which eventually would be suitable for us (higher powered being 350+hp). That left me wondering about their marketing and also their ability to read (when did 260hp max 350hp?) My take is that they are not interested in any way in the experimental market. Since then I have heard that they are still having prop problems due to unevenness in the cycle - can't remember the source but it was printed. I regretfully will be installing some form of Lycosaurus which it's ravenous appetite and dislike for hot starting. If it's not too early, received first card 1 month ago, Merry Christmas to all, Rodger --- Jeff Carpenter <jeff@westcottpress.com> wrote: > <jeff@westcottpress.com> > > http://www.flyjeta.com/tech.htm > > What say you engine experts? > > > Click on > about > provided > www.buildersbooks.com > Admin. > > browse > Subscriptions page, > FAQ, > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > > > > > ___________________________________________________________ All new Yahoo! Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity and ease of use." - PC Magazine http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html -- 12:53 PM -- 12:53 PM


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:07:19 AM PST US
    From: "C Smith" <pilot4profit@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Hot Starts Lycoming?
    Any one care to share their hot start tips????? CS


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:33:32 AM PST US
    From: "Brian Douglas" <bsponcil@belinblank.org>
    Subject: Re: Paint experience
    This past summer I borrowed a HVLP system from a guy at our airport and shot my practice kit control surface just to see how good of a job I could do. The final result was pretty poor so I decided I'd just give up on that idea and let the pros do it for me. Since then I bought an el-cheapo gun from Wally-World to shoot the interior surfaces of the tailcone skins with epoxy primer (I had until then been using rattle can stuff) and after shooting all of those skins and associated bulkheads I'm coming back around to the thought of shooting the paint myself. It takes some time and experimentation to get the gun set up right and to figure out all of the other variables in the process but my guess is that by the time you've shot the tailcone and wings, you'll be much more confident in your ability and you'll have made all of the mistakes you need to make and figured out how to fix them. It sounds like Rob is well beyond that point in his build so I'm not sure what to suggest as far a practice. Scrap aluminum from the junkyard? Old wheelbarrow? Helpfully suggest to the wife that the gargage doors need to be re-painted? One thing I'll say is that el-cheapo gun has a TREMENDOUS amount of overspray. I'd swear that every flat surface in my garage has a 1/16" layer of grey dust on it. -Brian #40497 Iowa City, IA ----- Original Message ----- From: Rob Wright To: rv10-list@matronics.com Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 11:24 PM Subject: RV10-List: Paint experience How much experience did you (anyone) have prior to doing your own priming and then paint? I need to start planning. For the simplicity of the fuse interior, it seems that I can both prime and paint with an inexpensive gun (<$50 or<$75), then I can save up for a higher quality exterior gun after I fly for a while. Questions: How's the learning curve? How many practice pieces before committing? What about gravity vs. standard fed guns? Meaning, how easy is it to manipulate the gun to all the nooks and crannys with such a big cup without losing paint flow? Recommend pint or quart cup to cover the interior, or go with a touch-up gun? I see on Tim's site that he only used about a quart total for the whole inside. Thanks, Rob Wright #392 Fuse Access Covers


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:36:43 AM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: Hot Starts Lycoming?
    I have the plain Bendix/Precision style silverhawk injection. For a hot start: No prime Throttle cracked about 1/4-1/2" Mixture full lean to cutoff While cranking, as soon as it fires, rapidly move the mixture to the normal ground lean range....maybe 1" back from full rich. Then add or remove throttle as necessary. When I've failed, it's because I didn't get the mixture forward in time and it didn't stay running, and expecially at first I was confused as to how to proceed from there.... prime, no prime, mixture cutoff, or leave it where it is. Even back when I messed up a little, I still was able to get it started within a couple attempts. Now days I just don't fail the first time as often. I still don't really have a procedure figured out for a perfect recovery from a failed start, because it hasn't happened more than maybe 5-6 times since I started flying, but generally I think I'd actually give it a quick prime and go idle cutoff for the reattempt. That one would need some experimentation, and I'd rather just do it right the first time. ;) Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying do not archive C Smith wrote: > > Any one care to share their hot start tips????? > CS > >


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:28:28 AM PST US
    From: "Mark Ritter" <mritter509@msn.com>
    Subject: Re: Hot Starts Lycoming?
    I also have the Bendix injection system. The Lycoming engine manuel has the following advice on hot starts: "Because fuel percolates the system must be cleared of vapor: it is recommended the same procedure for starting a cold engine be used for starting a hot engine" Don't know if this procedure assumes you have a fuel return line but it has worked in my rather limited experience - 50 hrs. and waiting on paint shop to finish. Tim's idea of not turning on the boost pump may prevent from having to go to a flooded start procedure. On another subject - I'm working on an RV-10 POH. Does anyone have a completed POH that could be used to compare? Mark (N410MR) >From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com> >To: rv10-list@matronics.com >Subject: Re: RV10-List: Hot Starts Lycoming? >Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2006 10:34:52 -0600 > > >I have the plain Bendix/Precision style silverhawk injection. > >For a hot start: > >No prime >Throttle cracked about 1/4-1/2" >Mixture full lean to cutoff >While cranking, as soon as it fires, rapidly move the mixture to >the normal ground lean range....maybe 1" back from full rich. >Then add or remove throttle as necessary. > >When I've failed, it's because I didn't get the mixture >forward in time and it didn't stay running, and expecially >at first I was confused as to how to proceed from there.... >prime, no prime, mixture cutoff, or leave it where it is. >Even back when I messed up a little, I still was able to >get it started within a couple attempts. Now days I just >don't fail the first time as often. > >I still don't really have a procedure figured out for >a perfect recovery from a failed start, because it hasn't >happened more than maybe 5-6 times since I started flying, >but generally I think I'd actually give it a quick prime >and go idle cutoff for the reattempt. That one would need >some experimentation, and I'd rather just do it right >the first time. ;) > >Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying >do not archive > > >C Smith wrote: >> >>Any one care to share their hot start tips????? >>CS >> >> > > _________________________________________________________________ MSN Shopping has everything on your holiday list. Get expert picks by style, age, and price. Try it! http://shopping.msn.com/content/shp/?ctId00,ptnrid=176,ptnrdata 0601&tcode=wlmtagline


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:55:06 AM PST US
    From: "Kelly McMullen" <apilot2@gmail.com>
    Subject: Engine analyzer/monitor
    Anyone looked at this system? http://www.xerionavionix.com/


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:09:27 PM PST US
    From: "Jesse Saint" <jesse@itecusa.org>
    Subject: Hot Starts Lycoming?
    I think my dad uses the same as for cold start, maybe not running the boost pump quite as long. He has the Bendix injection with 2 Slick mags and a Slick Start. Mixture Rich Throttle In Boost Pump 3-4 seconds Mixture Lean Cutoff Throttle 1/2" in or so Crank till fires Mixture Rich Throttle Idle Seems to work pretty well with over 300 hrs so far. Do not archive. Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. jesse@itecusa.org www.itecusa.org W: 352-465-4545 C: 352-427-0285 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of C Smith Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2006 11:06 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Hot Starts Lycoming? Any one care to share their hot start tips????? CS -- 12:53 PM -- 12:53 PM


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:12:01 PM PST US
    From: "C Smith" <pilot4profit@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Hot Starts Lycoming?
    Subject: Re: RV10-List: Hot Starts Lycoming? I also have the Bendix injection system. The Lycoming engine manuel has the following advice on hot starts: "Because fuel percolates the system must be cleared of vapor: it is recommended the same procedure for starting a cold engine be used for starting a hot engine" Don't know if this procedure assumes you have a fuel return line but it has worked in my rather limited experience - 50 hrs. and waiting on paint shop to finish. Tim's idea of not turning on the boost pump may prevent from having to go to a flooded start procedure. Unfortunately this doesn't work in my '04 T182T. Thanks for offering just the same. I'm just trying to see what others are doing and what works for them. CS


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:05:30 PM PST US
    From: "Chris Hukill" <cjhukill@cox.net>
    Subject: Gear leg fairings
    When I built my RV8, I flew around for about a year before I finally permanently installed my gear leg/ wheel fairings. Then I jacked the plane and crawled around on the floor for many hours to get them installed. NEVER AGAIN I said to myself, and anyone within cursing range of my hangar. On my RV10, I currently have the main fuselage section, with gear legs temporarily installed, minus the tailcone, hanging from my aerolift, at standing height. I was able to perfectly align and level the fuselage, in all axis, using tiedown straps around the wingspars, and the boarding steps. I drop plumb-bobs thru the centerline rivet holes down to a heavy steel 4X8 foot table aligned beneath the fuselage. With this accurately jigged arraignment I have been able to install and drill all the fairings while comfortably seated at the worktable, using a series of rulers, squares, and taught string references. One could do this just as well with the tailcone and cabin attached, and a block and tackle system could replace an aerolift. This, my fourth homebuilt project, has become my challenge to be the most organized and comfortable project it can be. If that means doing gear leg fairings this early on, so be it. Chris Hukill buildus interuptus during major home remodel


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:05:16 PM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: Hot Starts Lycoming?
    Yeah, I'm sure that it's going to be somewhat dependent on what engine, what injection system, and even what installation airframe (cowl heat and stuff like that) that you have, so as always, YMMV. It's funny, when I run into bonanza pilots and some people I've flown and been around, they all seem to jump on me with their ideas. Many have even told me before they even asked, that I should do it the way I am. It just seems to be that once you find the method that works for you, you should stick with it. Fortunately, from the few posts we've had already, you can tell that in the RV-10, with an IO-540, using the Bendix system, there are already a few ways that have acceptable results. One thing for sure, when my engine is cold, (or just unplugged in this season), it sure pops off extremely quickly. I hardly have time to turn the key all the way and it's running. People who take rides are often amazed it starts without the usual cranking and 5-10 prop revolutions that you sometimes see on the airfield. Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying do not archive C Smith wrote: > > > > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Hot Starts Lycoming? > > > I also have the Bendix injection system. The Lycoming engine manuel has the > > following advice on hot starts: > > "Because fuel percolates the system must be cleared of vapor: it is > recommended the same procedure for starting a cold engine be used for > starting a hot engine" > > Don't know if this procedure assumes you have a fuel return line but it has > worked in my rather limited experience - 50 hrs. and waiting on paint shop > to finish. Tim's idea of not turning on the boost pump may prevent from > having to go to a flooded start procedure. > > > > Unfortunately this doesn't work in my '04 T182T. Thanks for offering just > the same. I'm just trying to see what others are doing and what works for > them. > CS


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:16:52 PM PST US
    From: "Kelly McMullen" <apilot2@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Hot Starts Lycoming?
    I can tell you what works on my Lyc IO360-A1A with Bendix injection. Leave mixture idle cutoff. Turn boost pump on just long enough to see 15lbs or more pressure.maybe 2 sec. Advance throttle to about 1/2". Begin cranking. After about 5-6 blades, begin easing mixture forward slowly. Somewhere around 1/3 of mixture travel engine will fire and bring mixture up to maybe 2/3s and reducing throttle to 1000 rpm. Has been very reliable for 500 hrs. I have Bendix shower of sparks retard breaker mags and Skytec lightweight starter, which certainly contributes with much faster crank speed. If first try doesn't suceed...rare, but happens..wait a minute for starter to cool, try again. If that fails, go to flooded start procedure. 4 cyl Lycomings aren't very prone to flooding. Cold start...wait min. 30 seconds after priming before cranking. It lets fuel vaporize and makes for very quick start. On 12/9/06, Tim Olson <Tim@myrv10.com> wrote: > > Yeah, I'm sure that it's going to be somewhat dependent on > what engine, what injection system, and even what installation > airframe (cowl heat and stuff like that) that you have, so as > always, YMMV. It's funny, when I run into bonanza pilots and > some people I've flown and been around, they all seem to jump > on me with their ideas. Many have even told me before they > even asked, that I should do it the way I am. It just seems > to be that once you find the method that works for you, you > should stick with it. Fortunately, from the few posts we've > had already, you can tell that in the RV-10, with an IO-540, > using the Bendix system, there are already a few ways that > have acceptable results. > > One thing for sure, when my engine is cold, (or just unplugged > in this season), it sure pops off extremely quickly. I > hardly have time to turn the key all the way and it's > running. People who take rides are often amazed it starts > without the usual cranking and 5-10 prop revolutions that > you sometimes see on the airfield. > > Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying > do not archive > > > C Smith wrote: > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Hot Starts Lycoming? > > > > > > I also have the Bendix injection system. The Lycoming engine manuel has the > > > > following advice on hot starts: > > > > "Because fuel percolates the system must be cleared of vapor: it is > > recommended the same procedure for starting a cold engine be used for > > starting a hot engine" > > > > Don't know if this procedure assumes you have a fuel return line but it has > > worked in my rather limited experience - 50 hrs. and waiting on paint shop > > to finish. Tim's idea of not turning on the boost pump may prevent from > > having to go to a flooded start procedure. > > > > > > > > Unfortunately this doesn't work in my '04 T182T. Thanks for offering just > > the same. I'm just trying to see what others are doing and what works for > > them. > > CS > >


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:19:15 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Another Alternative Engine?
    From: "johngoodman" <johngoodman@earthlink.net>
    carl.froehlich(at)cox.net wrote: > Two problems: > - Price (>$80K) > - French > > -- I don't mind the French, but it's pretty heavy as well. John -------- #40572 Empennage - Starting tailcone. N711JG reserved Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p455#80455


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:31:15 PM PST US
    Subject: Paint experience
    From: "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)" <rvbuilder@sausen.net>
    Use SprayGunDepot.com. I've used them a few times and never had a problem. Got the PPS from them about a month ago along with adapters for my guns. Haven't had a chance to use it yet though. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rodger Todd Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2006 8:59 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Paint experience Hi Tim, "they make a plastic liner disposable paint cup that has it's own integral filter. It was awesome for doing even the undersides of things, because as the paint got used, the liner collapsed, keeping it void of air for the most part" I think you're refering to the 3M PPS system here which is available for most guns. I'm in the process of getting it for my Sata Minijet 4 - been on order for over two months, the distributor is currently waiting for the mini-cups. See http://multimedia.mmm.com/mws/mediawebserver.dyn?6666660Zjcf6lVs6EVs66Se ggCOrrrrQ- or if this doesn't work then go to the 3M site and search for PPS. I think some one here mentioned this some months ago. Best wishes, Rodger --- Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com> wrote: > <Tim@MyRV10.com> > > Reply inline... > > > Rob Wright wrote: > > How much experience did you (anyone) have prior to > doing your own > > priming and then paint? I need to start planning. > For the simplicity > > of the fuse interior, it seems that I can both > prime and paint with an > > inexpensive gun (<$50 or<$75), then I can save up > for a higher quality > > exterior gun after I fly for a while. > > > > Questions: > > > > How's the learning curve? > > > > The learning curve question is a very tough > question. It could vary > greatly for people. I do believe that those who are > priming their own > parts can benefit from the time spent priming, > however. My advice is > if you don't feel really comfortable, have someone > come over who is > when you get to the real painting, and give you a > hand with some parts, > or at least critique you. Most people will know > SOMEONE who they > can call who's painted things before, even if it's a > friend of a > friend. So talk about it with those close to you > and see who > knows who. Even if it cost you a couple hundred > bucks for an off-duty > auto body person for a day, you'd learn > things....and a professional > paid paint job will still be many THOUSANDS more. > > > > > > How many practice pieces before committing? > > > > Painting isn't too bad when you get the theory down > and have some > practice. After doing the plane I painted and > matched a couple of > car pieces too, including clearcoat. The only thing > that didn't > turn out perfect is I did it in a dusty garage and > got some dirt > in the clearcoat. If you have someone get you > started, there's no > reason that you can't do a reasonable job. I'll > never pay for a > car to be painted again, from what I've found now. > So now my > wife can nail all the deer she wants. ;) > > > > > > > What about gravity vs. standard fed guns? Meaning, > how easy is it to > > manipulate the gun to all the nooks and crannys > with such a big cup > > without losing paint flow? > > > > > > Here's a good suggestion for you. I think the > pressure pot guns would > do good for people on the main color, but we didn't > use them. But, > the guy who helped me had a good trick. For the > Sata guns we used, > they make a plastic liner disposable paint cup that > has it's own > integral filter. It was awesome for doing even the > undersides > of things, because as the paint got used, the liner > collapsed, keeping > it void of air for the most part. This eliminated > the issue. They > weren't too expensive, and it was nice to just throw > away the liners > when done with a session. Again, a small cost > compared to paying > a pro. > > Incidently, keeping a paint job simple (which is > what I consider mine > to be), can help make it easier. One large single > color base followed > by 1 or 2 stripe colors isn't really a big deal. > Actually, the color > stripes are even easier to do on top of the base, > and I found the base > coat clearcoat to be even easier to work with in > general. But I am > glad I went single stage on the main color. > > > > > > > Recommend pint or quart cup to cover the interior, > or go with a touch-up > > gun? I see on Tim's site that he only used about > a quart total for the > > whole inside. > > > > The interior is harder to maneuver around than the > exterior. I now own, > AFTER the fact, a nice SATA MiniJet with a smaller > cup that would be > great for the small areas on the interior. I think > you could use > either, but you'll want to put any inline hose > filters somewhere > upstream a ways so the hose connects directly to the > gun with a 10' > whip instead of quick connectors. That makes it > easier to flex > around. I don't know what I'd do if I could do it > all over again. > Probably use the minijet on the interior, since it's > such a small > area. > > Either way, when you paint the plane, you're going > to mix up larger > batches of paint than what one gun cup will hold. > You need to be able > to just pour more into the gun and carry on quick, > in order to keep > painting along the wet edge on the larger parts. > The good news is, > if you can't keep up and keep the edge wet, you can > back up to a > seam or some spot and start that panel with a new > edge. Anyway, > you just don't want to have to stop and mix more > paint during a large > shoot if possible. It also might be nice, if you > have the time > and space to do it, to do a couple major pieces at a > time. Like > the day you do the fuselage, don't do anything else. > Do the wings > another day. Then do the small parts another day. > That helps > break things up. > > For my next plane, I may even just plastic line my > garage and do > the entire thing there, as the color striped we did > there turned > out fine. I'd just need to get some blower/filter > stuff set up > but I could do that cheap enough to still make the > entire job > a bargain over a paid-for pro job. Mine isn't the > prettiest > plane out there, but it still seems to look good to > most > people from what I can tell. > > Tim > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Rob Wright > > > > #392 > > > > Fuse Access Covers > > > > * > > > Click on > about > provided > === message truncated == ___________________________________________________________ All new Yahoo! Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity and ease of use." - PC Magazine http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:34:38 PM PST US
    From: "Rob Wright" <armywrights@adelphia.net>
    Subject: Fuse Part
    For those past the Access Covers section (35), last page where it shows the bolt access covers, F-1050B. When holding mine up to their install location, they don't seem to match up very well or I'll need to introduce a crease to make them sit flush. Wonder what others' experiences have been and any pics if available. Looks like if I installed them right now it would overlap the powder coated angle on the fwd end and underlap it on the rear end of the cover. Sorry no pics yet I didn't have the camera with me today. Rob Wright #392 Fuse Access Covers




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv10-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV10-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv10-list
  • Browse RV10-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --