Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 03:02 AM - Re: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy ()
2. 03:29 AM - Re: GNS 430 wiring (was Everybody doing taxes?) (Indran Chelvanayagam)
3. 04:34 AM - Re: GNS 430 wiring (was Everybody doing taxes?) (McGANN, Ron)
4. 06:11 AM - Re: Torque Specs for NPT fittings (Don)
5. 06:16 AM - Re: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy (Bobby J. Hughes)
6. 06:22 AM - Re: Re: Torque Specs for NPT fittings (James Hein)
7. 06:26 AM - Re: Re: Torque Specs for NPT fittings (Rick)
8. 06:45 AM - Re: Re: Torque Specs for NPT fittings (James Hein)
9. 07:04 AM - Re: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy (Jesse Saint)
10. 07:11 AM - Re: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy (Condrey, Bob (US SSA))
11. 07:36 AM - Re: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy (Deems Davis)
12. 07:37 AM - Re: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy (Lloyd, Daniel R.)
13. 07:48 AM - Re: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy (John Testement)
14. 08:13 AM - Re: Everybody doing taxes? (John Ackerman)
15. 08:44 AM - Re: C-FXCS Flies.... (Pascal)
16. 09:24 AM - avionics cooling fan (curtis groote)
17. 09:35 AM - Re: C-FXCS Flies.... (Miles Bowen)
18. 09:35 AM - Re: C-FXCS Flies.... (Jesse Saint)
19. 10:06 AM - Re: avionics cooling fan (SteinAir, Inc.)
20. 10:38 AM - Re: avionics cooling fan ()
21. 11:41 AM - Re: C-FXCS Flies.... (John Gonzalez)
22. 12:40 PM - Re: Re: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy ()
23. 01:19 PM - Re: Re: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy (Ralph E. Capen)
24. 01:22 PM - Matco wheel vs Van's tube (Phil White)
25. 02:23 PM - Dynon's AOA pitot (John Gonzalez)
26. 02:45 PM - Re: Matco wheel vs Van's tube (Condrey, Bob (US SSA))
27. 03:25 PM - Re: Re: C-FXCS Flies.... ()
28. 03:42 PM - Re: avionics cooling fan (Indran Chelvanayagam)
29. 03:45 PM - Re: Re: C-FXCS Flies.... (Pascal)
30. 03:54 PM - Re: Dynon's AOA pitot (Randy DeBauw)
31. 03:58 PM - Sun & Fun Plans? (Eric Parlow)
32. 04:42 PM - Re: Dynon's AOA pitot (Jon Reining)
33. 04:45 PM - Re: Re: Dynon's AOA pitot (Randy DeBauw)
34. 05:00 PM - Re: Re: Dynon's AOA pitot (John Gonzalez)
35. 05:11 PM - Minimum power required for level flight (Eric Panning)
36. 07:16 PM - Sun-N-Fun (Jesse Saint)
37. 07:48 PM - Re: Sun-N-Fun (Dave Leikam)
38. 07:55 PM - Re: GNS 430 wiring (was Everybody doing taxes?) (JSMcGrew@aol.com)
39. 08:04 PM - Re: Sun-N-Fun (orchidman)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy |
Jesse: I am interested in the dual setup. Roy Russell
---- Jesse Saint <jesse@saintaviation.com> wrote:
>
> That could be done without too much trouble, probably. I could talk to the
> machinist and design a base. The single visor will cover both sides, just
> not both at the same time, so whoever is flying can use it. How many would
> be interested in this setup? I have 20 people now who want the visor, so
> that gets into a half-decent price for the base. Doing a double base would
> probably take the kit with two visors to about $350 or so.
>
> Jesse Saint
> Saint Aviation, Inc.
> jesse@saintaviation.com
> www.saintaviation.com
> Cell: 352-427-0285
> Fax: 815-377-3694
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
> kilopapa@antelecom.net
> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 7:47 PM
> To: rv10-list@matronics.com
> Subject: RE: RV10-List: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy
>
>
> Have you looked at a center mount that would allow 2 visors
> to hang from it, one for each side?
>
> Kevin
> 40494
>
> ><jesse@saintaviation.com>
> >
> >If I or anybody else comes out with a way to mount it on
> >the outside corners, it would be easy to get another visor
> >and put the first one and the new one on the outside
> >corners. The mount would then not be useable, but the new
> >mount would replace it anyway. We could have put it on the
> >outside corners with screws through the door channel, but
> >the problem is that it would be in the way quite a bit with
> >no way to get it completely out of the way so it didn't
> >obstruct visibility.
> >
> > Do not archive.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> 11:52 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Everybody doing taxes?) |
Sorry - I'm sending this email as a means to procrastinate about
doing my Quarterly BAS (Business Activity Statement) and PAYG (Pay as
you go) tax to the ATO (Australian Tax Office).
Lighting Bus Lo = negative or ground for DC voltages.
Lighting bus Hi can be configured to accept various voltages.
Apparently the selection of incorrect voltage doesn't damage the unit
- see page F-27, figure F-13, note 4 of the installation manual.
I've just been through this with my 430. I have a Flight Design
Systems LC40e dimmer controller, which is basically a pulse width
modulated unit. Connecting the 430 to this produces a visible (and
annoying) pulse in light intensity. I fiddled with various settings/
offsets on the lighting setup on the 430, but found that none were
satisfactory to me - ie eliminated pulsation, but gave reasonable
response to turning the dimmer knob. The automatic setting using the
built-in photocell is entirely adequate for varying illumination
levels. The other answer would be to run a voltage straight through a
potentiometer to the 430 lighting bus, but the idea of wasting
precious electrons as heat makes me cringe!
Hope this helps
Indran
#40228 - Looks like an aircraft, but isn't one yet!
On 16/04/2007, at 12:51 PM, McGANN, Ron wrote:
> With all the tax prep being done, hopefully someone can help me
> with a simple question.
>
> Section 4.2.2.2 of the GNS430 installation manual refers to
> Lighting Bus Hi and Lighting Bus Lo connections on P4001. Section
> 5.2.6 defines the lighting config pages but does not dicsriminate
> between the Hi and Lo buses. Assuming the Hi bus is connected to a
> 14V dimmer cct, what is Lighting Bus Lo used for?
>
> cheers,
> Ron
> 187 finishing
> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List_-
> ============================================================ _-
> forums.matronics.com_-
> ===========================================================
>
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Everybody doing taxes?) |
Thanks Indran. I guess I am a little surprised that the Lighting Bus Lo
is another ground connection. There are already two aircraft ground
pins on P4001. I didn't see anything in the lighting description to
indicate the lighting bus accommodates a negative voltage. I could find
no description of Lighting Bus Lo at all. But it sounds like I could
just use the photocell rather than a dimmer.
Mine looks like an aeroplane as well, but I know I have loooong way to
go.
cheers
Ron
BTW - thanks for reminding me about my BAS!!!
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com on behalf of Indran
Chelvanayagam
Sent: Mon 16/04/2007 19:59
Subject: Re: GNS 430 wiring (was RV10-List: Everybody doing taxes?)
Sorry - I'm sending this email as a means to procrastinate about
doing my Quarterly BAS (Business Activity Statement) and PAYG (Pay as
you go) tax to the ATO (Australian Tax Office).
Lighting Bus Lo = negative or ground for DC voltages.
Lighting bus Hi can be configured to accept various voltages.
Apparently the selection of incorrect voltage doesn't damage the unit
- see page F-27, figure F-13, note 4 of the installation manual.
I've just been through this with my 430. I have a Flight Design
Systems LC40e dimmer controller, which is basically a pulse width
modulated unit. Connecting the 430 to this produces a visible (and
annoying) pulse in light intensity. I fiddled with various settings/
offsets on the lighting setup on the 430, but found that none were
satisfactory to me - ie eliminated pulsation, but gave reasonable
response to turning the dimmer knob. The automatic setting using the
built-in photocell is entirely adequate for varying illumination
levels. The other answer would be to run a voltage straight through a
potentiometer to the 430 lighting bus, but the idea of wasting
precious electrons as heat makes me cringe!
Hope this helps
Indran
#40228 - Looks like an aircraft, but isn't one yet!
On 16/04/2007, at 12:51 PM, McGANN, Ron wrote:
> With all the tax prep being done, hopefully someone can help me
> with a simple question.
>
> Section 4.2.2.2 of the GNS430 installation manual refers to
> Lighting Bus Hi and Lighting Bus Lo connections on P4001. Section
> 5.2.6 defines the lighting config pages but does not dicsriminate
> between the Hi and Lo buses. Assuming the Hi bus is connected to a
> 14V dimmer cct, what is Lighting Bus Lo used for?
>
> cheers,
> Ron
> 187 finishing
>
>
=========
>
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Torque Specs for NPT fittings |
Pipe thread fitting torque
1/8" Pipe 45-65 in-lbs
1/4" Pipe 70-110 in-lbs
3/8" Pipe 95-135 in-lbs
1/2" Pipe 110-140 in-lbs
Hope this helps
Don
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=107253#107253
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy |
Jesse,
What about a two sided clamp for the center post similar to the Rosen
Universal visor? Should allow for both visors to move independently.
Bobby
40116
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Saint
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 3:33 PM
Subject: RE: RV10-List: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy
That could be done without too much trouble, probably. I could talk to
the machinist and design a base. The single visor will cover both
sides, just not both at the same time, so whoever is flying can use it.
How many would be interested in this setup? I have 20 people now who
want the visor, so that gets into a half-decent price for the base.
Doing a double base would probably take the kit with two visors to about
$350 or so.
Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation, Inc.
jesse@saintaviation.com
www.saintaviation.com
Cell: 352-427-0285
Fax: 815-377-3694
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
kilopapa@antelecom.net
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 7:47 PM
Subject: RE: RV10-List: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy
Have you looked at a center mount that would allow 2 visors to hang from
it, one for each side?
Kevin
40494
><jesse@saintaviation.com>
>
>If I or anybody else comes out with a way to mount it on the outside
>corners, it would be easy to get another visor and put the first one
>and the new one on the outside corners. The mount would then not be
>useable, but the new mount would replace it anyway. We could have put
>it on the outside corners with screws through the door channel, but the
>problem is that it would be in the way quite a bit with no way to get
>it completely out of the way so it didn't obstruct visibility.
>
> Do not archive.
--
11:52 AM
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Torque Specs for NPT fittings |
This helps a great deal!
Tim - Put this on your site with the other torque specs.. Please! :)
Thanks!
-Jim 40384
Don wrote:
>
>Pipe thread fitting torque
>
>1/8" Pipe 45-65 in-lbs
>1/4" Pipe 70-110 in-lbs
>3/8" Pipe 95-135 in-lbs
>1/2" Pipe 110-140 in-lbs
>
>Hope this helps
>
>
>Don
>
>
>Read this topic online here:
>
>http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=107253#107253
>
>
>
>
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Torque Specs for NPT fittings |
Don,
You can't get away with just posting the torque without reminding everyone how
to calculate the torque while using a crows foot!! ;)
Flying out tonght to S n F on the commercial redeye, hope see everyone who's there
over the next few days.
Rick S.
40185
do not archive
Message 8
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Torque Specs for NPT fittings |
Hey now... Give me some credit! :)
I found the calculation for using a crow's foot in AC43.13, but never
could find the NPT torque specs in there..
-Jim 40384
Rick wrote:
>
>Don,
>
>You can't get away with just posting the torque without reminding everyone how
to calculate the torque while using a crows foot!! ;)
>
>Flying out tonght to S n F on the commercial redeye, hope see everyone who's there
over the next few days.
>
>Rick S.
>40185
>
>do not archive
>
>
>
>
Message 9
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy |
That would work, but would be more complicated, would not look as good, and
would obstruct the view of the pilot when not wanted - IMHO.
Do not archive.
Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation, Inc.
jesse@saintaviation.com
www.saintaviation.com
Cell: 352-427-0285
Fax: 815-377-3694
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bobby J. Hughes
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 10:09 AM
Subject: RE: RV10-List: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy
Jesse,
What about a two sided clamp for the center post similar to the Rosen
Universal visor? Should allow for both visors to move independently.
Bobby
40116
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Saint
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 3:33 PM
Subject: RE: RV10-List: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy
That could be done without too much trouble, probably. I could talk to
the machinist and design a base. The single visor will cover both
sides, just not both at the same time, so whoever is flying can use it.
How many would be interested in this setup? I have 20 people now who
want the visor, so that gets into a half-decent price for the base.
Doing a double base would probably take the kit with two visors to about
$350 or so.
Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation, Inc.
jesse@saintaviation.com
www.saintaviation.com
Cell: 352-427-0285
Fax: 815-377-3694
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
kilopapa@antelecom.net
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 7:47 PM
Subject: RE: RV10-List: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy
Have you looked at a center mount that would allow 2 visors to hang from
it, one for each side?
Kevin
40494
><jesse@saintaviation.com>
>
>If I or anybody else comes out with a way to mount it on the outside
>corners, it would be easy to get another visor and put the first one
>and the new one on the outside corners. The mount would then not be
>useable, but the new mount would replace it anyway. We could have put
>it on the outside corners with screws through the door channel, but the
>problem is that it would be in the way quite a bit with no way to get
>it completely out of the way so it didn't obstruct visibility.
>
> Do not archive.
--
11:52 AM
--
4:22 PM
Message 10
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy |
Jesse,
I'd be interested in the dual version.
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Saint
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 4:33 PM
Subject: RE: RV10-List: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy
That could be done without too much trouble, probably. I could talk to
the
machinist and design a base. The single visor will cover both sides,
just
not both at the same time, so whoever is flying can use it. How many
would
be interested in this setup? I have 20 people now who want the visor,
so
that gets into a half-decent price for the base. Doing a double base
would
probably take the kit with two visors to about $350 or so.
Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation, Inc.
jesse@saintaviation.com
www.saintaviation.com
Cell: 352-427-0285
Fax: 815-377-3694
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
kilopapa@antelecom.net
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 7:47 PM
Subject: RE: RV10-List: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy
Have you looked at a center mount that would allow 2 visors
to hang from it, one for each side?
Kevin
40494
><jesse@saintaviation.com>
>
>If I or anybody else comes out with a way to mount it on
>the outside corners, it would be easy to get another visor
>and put the first one and the new one on the outside
>corners. The mount would then not be useable, but the new
>mount would replace it anyway. We could have put it on the
>outside corners with screws through the door channel, but
>the problem is that it would be in the way quite a bit with
>no way to get it completely out of the way so it didn't
>obstruct visibility.
>
> Do not archive.
--
11:52 AM
Message 11
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy |
I'd be interested in dual's but would like to find a way to mount them
so they could swing to cover door windows also.
Deems Davis # 406
Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! )
http://deemsrv10.com/
Message 12
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy |
Jesse
I would be interested in the dual solution
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Saint
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 10:04 AM
Subject: RE: RV10-List: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy
That would work, but would be more complicated, would not look as good,
and
would obstruct the view of the pilot when not wanted - IMHO.
Do not archive.
Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation, Inc.
jesse@saintaviation.com
www.saintaviation.com
Cell: 352-427-0285
Fax: 815-377-3694
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bobby J.
Hughes
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 10:09 AM
Subject: RE: RV10-List: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy
Jesse,
What about a two sided clamp for the center post similar to the Rosen
Universal visor? Should allow for both visors to move independently.
Bobby
40116
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Saint
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 3:33 PM
Subject: RE: RV10-List: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy
That could be done without too much trouble, probably. I could talk to
the machinist and design a base. The single visor will cover both
sides, just not both at the same time, so whoever is flying can use it.
How many would be interested in this setup? I have 20 people now who
want the visor, so that gets into a half-decent price for the base.
Doing a double base would probably take the kit with two visors to about
$350 or so.
Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation, Inc.
jesse@saintaviation.com
www.saintaviation.com
Cell: 352-427-0285
Fax: 815-377-3694
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
kilopapa@antelecom.net
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 7:47 PM
Subject: RE: RV10-List: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy
Have you looked at a center mount that would allow 2 visors to hang from
it, one for each side?
Kevin
40494
><jesse@saintaviation.com>
>
>If I or anybody else comes out with a way to mount it on the outside
>corners, it would be easy to get another visor and put the first one
>and the new one on the outside corners. The mount would then not be
>useable, but the new mount would replace it anyway. We could have put
>it on the outside corners with screws through the door channel, but the
>problem is that it would be in the way quite a bit with no way to get
>it completely out of the way so it didn't obstruct visibility.
>
> Do not archive.
--
11:52 AM
--
4:22 PM
Message 13
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy |
Jesse,
Since I have a center overhead console I would have to mount visors to
either side. I would be interested in an installation that could mount above
the door posts.
John Testement
jwt@roadmapscoaching.com
40321
Richmond, VA
Paint prep and LOTS of misc stuff
do not archive
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Condrey, Bob (US
SSA)
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 10:11 AM
Subject: RE: RV10-List: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy
--> <bob.condrey@baesystems.com>
Jesse,
I'd be interested in the dual version.
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Saint
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 4:33 PM
Subject: RE: RV10-List: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy
That could be done without too much trouble, probably. I could talk to the
machinist and design a base. The single visor will cover both sides, just
not both at the same time, so whoever is flying can use it. How many would
be interested in this setup? I have 20 people now who want the visor, so
that gets into a half-decent price for the base. Doing a double base would
probably take the kit with two visors to about $350 or so.
Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation, Inc.
jesse@saintaviation.com
www.saintaviation.com
Cell: 352-427-0285
Fax: 815-377-3694
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
kilopapa@antelecom.net
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 7:47 PM
Subject: RE: RV10-List: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy
Have you looked at a center mount that would allow 2 visors to hang from it,
one for each side?
Kevin
40494
><jesse@saintaviation.com>
>
>If I or anybody else comes out with a way to mount it on the outside
>corners, it would be easy to get another visor and put the first one
>and the new one on the outside corners. The mount would then not be
>useable, but the new mount would replace it anyway. We could have put
>it on the outside corners with screws through the door channel, but the
>problem is that it would be in the way quite a bit with no way to get
>it completely out of the way so it didn't obstruct visibility.
>
> Do not archive.
--
11:52 AM
--
7:58 PM
--
7:58 PM
Message 14
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Everybody doing taxes? |
Dave, I installed the "A" kit of the Advanced Flight Systems AOA
(http://www.advanced-flight-systems.com/Products/AOA/aoa.html) when I
was about where you are. I did not install the factory stall warner.
The AFS 3500 will be our engine monitor and backup EFIS, and it has
the ability to display and "speak" the AOA information. Nonetheless,
I'm leaning toward putting a separate AOA indicator smack in the
pilot's field of view, and am leaning toward the "PRO" model.
Does anybody have advice/opinions on this matter?
We're inventorying a friend's finish kit today and will probably
purchase it.
John Ackerman 40458 fuselage
do not archive
Has anybody else
On Apr 15, 2007, at 10:35 PM, Dave Leikam wrote:
> I have been doing inventory and organizing parts on my QB wings,
> fuse and finish kit and have been doing stuff with the kids during
> SB. Just about to store the tailcone and start on the wings.
>
> I have decided not to install a stall warning and rather AOA. What
> is the choice of AOA system for everyone. I am leaning towards a
> G900X panel which does not integrate AOA yet.
>
> Dave Leikam
> 40496
> Starting QB wings
>
Message 15
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: C-FXCS Flies.... |
I helped a local builder install the wings and ailerons this weekend and
we noticed that the aileron deflected up about 2-3 time more than it did
down on both sides. We didn't check the rigging yet but I wonder if that
is normal or if there should be equal deflection in both directions.
Thanks!
Pascal
----- Original Message -----
From: Jesse Saint
To: rv10-list@matronics.com
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 2:38 PM
Subject: RE: RV10-List: C-FXCS Flies....
Aileron trim, I'd say. Make sure your flaps and ailerons are rigged
evenly, because that can make it want to roll one way or the other, but
burning fuel out of the left first would lighten that side. I doubt
there is much more weight there, just having you sit on that side alone
makes a little difference. Again, aileron trim and rudder trim will
make the thing fly like it needs to no matter how you are loaded, for
the most part.
Do not archive.
Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation, Inc.
jesse@saintaviation.com
www.saintaviation.com
Cell: 352-427-0285
Fax: 815-377-3694
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ted French
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 8:15 PM
To: rv10-list@matronics.com
Subject: RV10-List: C-FXCS Flies....
RV-10 C-FXCS took to the air on Thurs Apr 5 with Colin Jordan at the
controls. He flew for one hour high power for break-in. The aircraft has
a heavy left wing, an oil leak on the pilot side, and I managed to
reverse the action on the aileron trim and the altitude hold. Colin said
when he landed that this was as close to taking off in a jet as you can
get without being in a jet. He was VERY impressed with the aircraft.
I delayed leaving on a weeks holidays so we could get the first flight
in, so I haven't addressed any of the issues as yet.
Question. What is the procedure to correct a heavy wing in an RV-10?
Do Not Archive
Ted French C-FXCS
RV-10 Flying
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-Listhttp://forums.matronics.com
Message 16
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | avionics cooling fan |
I can't find much on the search engine for avionics
cooling fans. Is there a consensus of opinion whether
it would be wise to install one in an IFR fitted
machine? I understand that some people do and some don't.
__________________________________________________
Message 17
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: C-FXCS Flies.... |
[quote="rv10builder(at)verizon.ne"]I helped a local builder install the wings and
ailerons this weekend and we noticed that the aileron deflected up about 2-3
time more than it did down on both sides. We didn't check the rigging yet
but I wonder if that is normal or if there should be equal deflection in both
directions.
Thanks!
Pascal
> ---
Most airplanes have this feature designed in to reduce adverse yaw. Perfectly normal.
Check your manual for what the actual deflections should be.
--------
Miles
1955 C170B
HRII Plans#211
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=107308#107308
Message 18
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | C-FXCS Flies.... |
That's normal.
Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation, Inc.
jesse@saintaviation.com
www.saintaviation.com
Cell: 352-427-0285
Fax: 815-377-3694
_____
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Pascal
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 11:42 AM
Subject: Re: RV10-List: C-FXCS Flies....
I helped a local builder install the wings and ailerons this weekend and we
noticed that the aileron deflected up about 2-3 time more than it did down
on both sides. We didn't check the rigging yet but I wonder if that is
normal or if there should be equal deflection in both directions.
Thanks!
Pascal
----- Original Message -----
From: Jesse <mailto:jesse@saintaviation.com> Saint
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 2:38 PM
Subject: RE: RV10-List: C-FXCS Flies....
Aileron trim, I'd say. Make sure your flaps and ailerons are rigged evenly,
because that can make it want to roll one way or the other, but burning fuel
out of the left first would lighten that side. I doubt there is much more
weight there, just having you sit on that side alone makes a little
difference. Again, aileron trim and rudder trim will make the thing fly
like it needs to no matter how you are loaded, for the most part.
Do not archive.
Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation, Inc.
jesse@saintaviation.com
www.saintaviation.com
Cell: 352-427-0285
Fax: 815-377-3694
_____
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ted French
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 8:15 PM
Subject: RV10-List: C-FXCS Flies....
RV-10 C-FXCS took to the air on Thurs Apr 5 with Colin Jordan at the
controls. He flew for one hour high power for break-in. The aircraft has a
heavy left wing, an oil leak on the pilot side, and I managed to reverse the
action on the aileron trim and the altitude hold. Colin said when he landed
that this was as close to taking off in a jet as you can get without being
in a jet. He was VERY impressed with the aircraft.
I delayed leaving on a weeks holidays so we could get the first flight in,
so I haven't addressed any of the issues as yet.
Question. What is the procedure to correct a heavy wing in an RV-10?
Do Not Archive
Ted French C-FXCS
RV-10 Flying
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
http://forums.matronics.com
href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com
/Navigator?RV10-List
href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
Message 19
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | avionics cooling fan |
It actually has more to do with what you are installing in the stack then
whether it's IFR or not. For example, things like Chelton screens, GNS-480
and some others have cooling fans built into them. Other things do not. If
you only have one radio like an ICOM installed by itself in the stack,
you're unlikely to need a cooling fan. But, if you ahve a full Garmin
stack, then it's a good idea. Some of the Garmin stuff has cooling ports
cast into the racks. The cooling fans are relatively cheap compared to the
cost of your avionics stack (somewhere around $150-250) and it's cheap
insurance for a $20-30K stack of avionics.
Perhaps of equal importance is not to just have a cooling fan, but some sort
of "vent" holes in the glareshield to let the hot air escape from. Do that
and you'll be in pretty good shape. So, in the end my recommendation is
that depending on your stack you may or may not need to install one.
Cheers,
Stein.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
>[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of curtis groote
>Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 11:24 AM
>To: rv10-list@matronics.com
>Subject: RV10-List: avionics cooling fan
>
>
>
>I can't find much on the search engine for avionics
>cooling fans. Is there a consensus of opinion whether
>it would be wise to install one in an IFR fitted
>machine? I understand that some people do and some don't.
>
>__________________________________________________
>
>
Message 20
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: avionics cooling fan |
Probably wise to install in any aircraft.
Just put a thermometer on your glare shield in the summer. You can assume it's
considerably warmer where your radios are. Keeping them cool may prolong their
life.
Depending on your region, you may be able to get by with just an outside air vent
circulating air to keep the radios cool. Most places, especially in the summer,
there should be a dedicated fan for cooling the radio stack.
I'll stay away from the debate on whether or not just to use a standard computer
type box fan, or a dedicated TSO'd avionics fan.
>
> From: curtis groote <cgroote1@yahoo.com>
> Date: 2007/04/16 Mon AM 11:24:10 EST
> To: rv10-list@matronics.com
> Subject: RV10-List: avionics cooling fan
>
>
> I can't find much on the search engine for avionics
> cooling fans. Is there a consensus of opinion whether
> it would be wise to install one in an IFR fitted
> machine? I understand that some people do and some don't.
>
> __________________________________________________
>
>
>
>
Message 21
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | C-FXCS Flies.... |
It is called differential aileron throw. The idea is that a down aileron
creates a lot more drag than the up aileron. Basically it limits the adverse
effect of the down aileron causing a yaw problem.
less down more up.
John
>From: "Jesse Saint" <jesse@saintaviation.com>
>To: <rv10-list@matronics.com>
>Subject: RE: RV10-List: C-FXCS Flies....
>Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:35:15 -0400
>
>That's normal.
>
>
>Jesse Saint
>
>Saint Aviation, Inc.
>
>jesse@saintaviation.com
>
>www.saintaviation.com
>
>Cell: 352-427-0285
>
>Fax: 815-377-3694
>
> _____
>
>From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
>[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Pascal
>Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 11:42 AM
>To: rv10-list@matronics.com
>Subject: Re: RV10-List: C-FXCS Flies....
>
>
>I helped a local builder install the wings and ailerons this weekend and we
>noticed that the aileron deflected up about 2-3 time more than it did down
>on both sides. We didn't check the rigging yet but I wonder if that is
>normal or if there should be equal deflection in both directions.
>
>Thanks!
>
>Pascal
>
>----- Original Message -----
>
>From: Jesse <mailto:jesse@saintaviation.com> Saint
>
>To: rv10-list@matronics.com
>
>Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 2:38 PM
>
>Subject: RE: RV10-List: C-FXCS Flies....
>
>
>Aileron trim, I'd say. Make sure your flaps and ailerons are rigged
>evenly,
>because that can make it want to roll one way or the other, but burning
>fuel
>out of the left first would lighten that side. I doubt there is much more
>weight there, just having you sit on that side alone makes a little
>difference. Again, aileron trim and rudder trim will make the thing fly
>like it needs to no matter how you are loaded, for the most part.
>
>
>Do not archive.
>
>
>Jesse Saint
>
>Saint Aviation, Inc.
>
>jesse@saintaviation.com
>
>www.saintaviation.com
>
>Cell: 352-427-0285
>
>Fax: 815-377-3694
>
>
> _____
>
>
>From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
>[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ted French
>Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 8:15 PM
>To: rv10-list@matronics.com
>Subject: RV10-List: C-FXCS Flies....
>
>
>RV-10 C-FXCS took to the air on Thurs Apr 5 with Colin Jordan at the
>controls. He flew for one hour high power for break-in. The aircraft has a
>heavy left wing, an oil leak on the pilot side, and I managed to reverse
>the
>action on the aileron trim and the altitude hold. Colin said when he landed
>that this was as close to taking off in a jet as you can get without being
>in a jet. He was VERY impressed with the aircraft.
>
>
>I delayed leaving on a weeks holidays so we could get the first flight in,
>so I haven't addressed any of the issues as yet.
>
>
>Question. What is the procedure to correct a heavy wing in an RV-10?
>
>
>Do Not Archive
>
>Ted French C-FXCS
>RV-10 Flying
>
>
>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
>http://forums.matronics.com
>
>
>href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com
>/Navigator?RV10-List
>href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
>
>
Message 22
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy |
Count me in. I'd be interested in the dual version. Jim
>
> From: "Condrey, Bob (US SSA)" <bob.condrey@baesystems.com>
> Date: 2007/04/16 Mon AM 09:10:50 EST
> To: <rv10-list@matronics.com>
> Subject: RE: RV10-List: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy
>
>
> Jesse,
>
> I'd be interested in the dual version.
>
> Bob
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Saint
> Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 4:33 PM
> To: rv10-list@matronics.com
> Subject: RE: RV10-List: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy
>
>
> That could be done without too much trouble, probably. I could talk to
> the
> machinist and design a base. The single visor will cover both sides,
> just
> not both at the same time, so whoever is flying can use it. How many
> would
> be interested in this setup? I have 20 people now who want the visor,
> so
> that gets into a half-decent price for the base. Doing a double base
> would
> probably take the kit with two visors to about $350 or so.
>
> Jesse Saint
> Saint Aviation, Inc.
> jesse@saintaviation.com
> www.saintaviation.com
> Cell: 352-427-0285
> Fax: 815-377-3694
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
> kilopapa@antelecom.net
> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 7:47 PM
> To: rv10-list@matronics.com
> Subject: RE: RV10-List: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy
>
>
> Have you looked at a center mount that would allow 2 visors
> to hang from it, one for each side?
>
> Kevin
> 40494
>
> ><jesse@saintaviation.com>
> >
> >If I or anybody else comes out with a way to mount it on
> >the outside corners, it would be easy to get another visor
> >and put the first one and the new one on the outside
> >corners. The mount would then not be useable, but the new
> >mount would replace it anyway. We could have put it on the
> >outside corners with screws through the door channel, but
> >the problem is that it would be in the way quite a bit with
> >no way to get it completely out of the way so it didn't
> >obstruct visibility.
> >
> > Do not archive.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> 11:52 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 23
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy |
Dual version - I'm interested too
-----Original Message-----
>From: gorejr@bellsouth.net
>Sent: Apr 16, 2007 3:38 PM
>To: rv10-list@matronics.com
>Subject: Re: RE: RV10-List: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy
>
>
>Count me in. I'd be interested in the dual version. Jim
>>
>> From: "Condrey, Bob (US SSA)" <bob.condrey@baesystems.com>
>> Date: 2007/04/16 Mon AM 09:10:50 EST
>> To: <rv10-list@matronics.com>
>> Subject: RE: RV10-List: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy
>>
>>
>> Jesse,
>>
>> I'd be interested in the dual version.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
>> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Saint
>> Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 4:33 PM
>> To: rv10-list@matronics.com
>> Subject: RE: RV10-List: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy
>>
>>
>> That could be done without too much trouble, probably. I could talk to
>> the
>> machinist and design a base. The single visor will cover both sides,
>> just
>> not both at the same time, so whoever is flying can use it. How many
>> would
>> be interested in this setup? I have 20 people now who want the visor,
>> so
>> that gets into a half-decent price for the base. Doing a double base
>> would
>> probably take the kit with two visors to about $350 or so.
>>
>> Jesse Saint
>> Saint Aviation, Inc.
>> jesse@saintaviation.com
>> www.saintaviation.com
>> Cell: 352-427-0285
>> Fax: 815-377-3694
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
>> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
>> kilopapa@antelecom.net
>> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 7:47 PM
>> To: rv10-list@matronics.com
>> Subject: RE: RV10-List: Rosen Sun Visor Group Buy
>>
>>
>> Have you looked at a center mount that would allow 2 visors
>> to hang from it, one for each side?
>>
>> Kevin
>> 40494
>>
>> ><jesse@saintaviation.com>
>> >
>> >If I or anybody else comes out with a way to mount it on
>> >the outside corners, it would be easy to get another visor
>> >and put the first one and the new one on the outside
>> >corners. The mount would then not be useable, but the new
>> >mount would replace it anyway. We could have put it on the
>> >outside corners with screws through the door channel, but
>> >the problem is that it would be in the way quite a bit with
>> >no way to get it completely out of the way so it didn't
>> >obstruct visibility.
>> >
>> > Do not archive.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> 11:52 AM
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Message 24
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Matco wheel vs Van's tube |
I replaced the Van's supplied front wheel with Matco's NW511.25. I
can't find the email that indicated which tube fits this new wheel with
its valve stem hole closer to the center. Does one need a different
tube, or does the 5.00-5 with TR-67 valve one that Van's originally
supplied work in the new wheel??
Phil White #40220 (doors & windows) in IL
Message 25
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Dynon's AOA pitot |
Has anyone installed and used the AOA pitot tube from Dynon. If so, what are
your impressions? I saw on their web site that they offer a heated version,
but Aircraft Spruce seems to only list the unheated version.
JOhn
Message 26
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Matco wheel vs Van's tube |
Original tube works.
Bob #40105
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Phil White
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 3:20 PM
Subject: RV10-List: Matco wheel vs Van's tube
I replaced the Van's supplied front wheel with Matco's NW511.25. I
can't find the email that indicated which tube fits this new wheel with
its valve stem hole closer to the center. Does one need a different
tube, or does the 5.00-5 with TR-67 valve one that Van's originally
supplied work in the new wheel??
Phil White #40220 (doors & windows) in IL
Message 27
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: C-FXCS Flies.... |
Ailerons are rigged as differential. In order to offset adverse yaw, the aileron
traveling up moves more than the aileron traveling down. (Downward aileron
increases wing camber / lift causing more drag.)
No it's normal for the aileron to move up more than down. It's by design.
Jim C
Do Not Archive
===========================================================
From: "Pascal" <rv10builder@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: RV10-List: C-FXCS Flies....
I helped a local builder install the wings and ailerons this weekend and we noticed
that the aileron deflected up about 2-3 time more than it did down on both
sides. We didn't check the rigging yet but I wonder if that is normal or if
there should be equal deflection in both directions.
Thanks!
Pascal
----- Original Message -----
From: Jesse Saint
To: rv10-list@matronics.com
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 2:38 PM
Subject: RE: RV10-List: C-FXCS Flies....
Aileron trim, I'd say. Make sure your flaps and ailerons are rigged evenly,
because that can make it want to roll one way or the other, but burning fuel out
of the left first would lighten that side. I doubt there is much more weight
there, just having you sit on that side alone makes a little difference. Again,
aileron trim and rudder trim will make the thing fly like it needs to no
matter how you are loaded, for the most part.
Do not archive.
Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation, Inc.
jesse@saintaviation.com
www.saintaviation.com
Cell: 352-427-0285
Fax: 815-377-3694
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ted French
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 8:15 PM
To: rv10-list@matronics.com
Subject: RV10-List: C-FXCS Flies....
RV-10 C-FXCS took to the air on Thurs Apr 5 with Colin Jordan at the controls.
He flew for one hour high power for break-in. The aircraft has a heavy left
wing, an oil leak on the pilot side, and I managed to reverse the action on the
aileron trim and the altitude hold. Colin said when he landed that this was
as close to taking off in a jet as you can get without being in a jet. He was
VERY impressed with the aircraft.
I delayed leaving on a weeks holidays so we could get the first flight in, so
I haven't addressed any of the issues as yet.
Question. What is the procedure to correct a heavy wing in an RV-10?
Do Not Archive
Ted French C-FXCS
RV-10 Flying
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-Listhttp://forums.matronics.com
===========================================================
Message 28
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: avionics cooling fan |
The Dynons under Australian summer conditions definitely need cooling
fans to prevent overheating!
Indran
On 17/04/2007, at 12:24 AM, curtis groote wrote:
>
> I can't find much on the search engine for avionics
> cooling fans. Is there a consensus of opinion whether
> it would be wise to install one in an IFR fitted
> machine? I understand that some people do and some don't.
>
> __________________________________________________
>
>
Message 29
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: C-FXCS Flies.... |
Thanks all for the responses!
Pascal
----- Original Message -----
From: <jim@CombsFive.Com>
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: Re: RV10-List: C-FXCS Flies....
>
> Ailerons are rigged as differential. In order to offset adverse yaw, the
> aileron traveling up moves more than the aileron traveling down.
> (Downward aileron increases wing camber / lift causing more drag.)
>
> No it's normal for the aileron to move up more than down. It's by design.
>
> Jim C
>
> Do Not Archive
>
> ===========================================================
> From: "Pascal" <rv10builder@verizon.net>
> Date: 2007/04/16 Mon AM 11:42:18 EDT
> To: <rv10-list@matronics.com>
> Subject: Re: RV10-List: C-FXCS Flies....
>
> I helped a local builder install the wings and ailerons this weekend and
> we noticed that the aileron deflected up about 2-3 time more than it did
> down on both sides. We didn't check the rigging yet but I wonder if that
> is normal or if there should be equal deflection in both directions.
> Thanks!
> Pascal
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jesse Saint
> To: rv10-list@matronics.com
> Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 2:38 PM
> Subject: RE: RV10-List: C-FXCS Flies....
>
>
> Aileron trim, I'd say. Make sure your flaps and ailerons are rigged
> evenly, because that can make it want to roll one way or the other, but
> burning fuel out of the left first would lighten that side. I doubt there
> is much more weight there, just having you sit on that side alone makes a
> little difference. Again, aileron trim and rudder trim will make the
> thing fly like it needs to no matter how you are loaded, for the most
> part.
>
>
> Do not archive.
>
>
> Jesse Saint
>
> Saint Aviation, Inc.
>
> jesse@saintaviation.com
>
> www.saintaviation.com
>
> Cell: 352-427-0285
>
> Fax: 815-377-3694
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ted French
> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 8:15 PM
> To: rv10-list@matronics.com
> Subject: RV10-List: C-FXCS Flies....
>
>
> RV-10 C-FXCS took to the air on Thurs Apr 5 with Colin Jordan at the
> controls. He flew for one hour high power for break-in. The aircraft has a
> heavy left wing, an oil leak on the pilot side, and I managed to reverse
> the action on the aileron trim and the altitude hold. Colin said when he
> landed that this was as close to taking off in a jet as you can get
> without being in a jet. He was VERY impressed with the aircraft.
>
>
> I delayed leaving on a weeks holidays so we could get the first flight
> in, so I haven't addressed any of the issues as yet.
>
>
> Question. What is the procedure to correct a heavy wing in an RV-10?
>
>
> Do Not Archive
>
> Ted French C-FXCS
> RV-10 Flying
>
> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-Listhttp://forums.matronics.com
>
>
> ===========================================================
>
>
>
Message 30
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Dynon's AOA pitot |
I have installed the early heated pitot and they are sending me the
updated one. The install is easy with the Grets pitot mount. I used the
AOA and wired it up and ran the tubing but changed my mind on it and
went with Rob's AOA. I never have used the dynon aoa function. Randy
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Gonzalez
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 2:22 PM
Subject: RV10-List: Dynon's AOA pitot
<indigoonlatigo@msn.com>
Has anyone installed and used the AOA pitot tube from Dynon. If so, what
are
your impressions? I saw on their web site that they offer a heated
version,
but Aircraft Spruce seems to only list the unheated version.
JOhn
Message 31
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Sun & Fun Plans? |
RV-10 specific plans for Sun & Fun?
I propose we all meet at Van's booth by the -10 at high noon Fri & Sat for a
photo and lunch.
ERic--
RV-10, 40014, Fiberglass Finishing :-(
N104EP
As a pilot, only two bad things can happen to you:
a. One day you will walk out to the aircraft knowing that it is your last
flight.
b. One day you will walk out to the aircraft not knowing that it is your
last flight.
Message 32
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Dynon's AOA pitot |
If you want to hook it up to a stand-alone AOA guage, is that possible? It looked
like the only output was to the Dynon EFIS, is that true?
Jon (and Bill) Reining
40514 - tailcone
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=107427#107427
Message 33
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Dynon's AOA pitot |
It will only work with the Dynon.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jon Reining
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 4:42 PM
Subject: RV10-List: Re: Dynon's AOA pitot
<jonathan.w.reining@wellsfargo.com>
If you want to hook it up to a stand-alone AOA guage, is that possible?
It looked like the only output was to the Dynon EFIS, is that true?
Jon (and Bill) Reining
40514 - tailcone
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=107427#107427
Message 34
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Dynon's AOA pitot |
It appears that it only works with Dynon. What I find interesting is that
all these EFIS companies are competing with one another and one company
might get ahead with a new release, but then other is soon to catch up and
then offer it with a lower price.
It seems that if I am going to use a Dynon as a primary or a secondary, why
spend the extra$$$$ for a seperate AOA unit.
John
>From: "Randy DeBauw" <Randy@abros.com>
>To: <rv10-list@matronics.com>
>Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Dynon's AOA pitot
>Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:43:38 -0700
>
>
>It will only work with the Dynon.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
>[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jon Reining
>Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 4:42 PM
>To: rv10-list@matronics.com
>Subject: RV10-List: Re: Dynon's AOA pitot
>
><jonathan.w.reining@wellsfargo.com>
>
>If you want to hook it up to a stand-alone AOA guage, is that possible?
>It looked like the only output was to the Dynon EFIS, is that true?
>
>Jon (and Bill) Reining
>40514 - tailcone
>
>
>Read this topic online here:
>
>http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=107427#107427
>
>
Message 35
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Minimum power required for level flight |
Hi,
This question is for those with flying RV-10's. Has
anyone noted the minimum power setting to maintain
level flight? Did you note the airspeed, altitude and
% power (MP/RPM) or fuel flow (leaned or not) +
loading conditions (gross, light, etc)?
Has anyone constructed a power required curve with
more data points?
100% 211 mph
85% 201 mph (8000 ft, 2200 lb 260 HP per Van's)
75%
65%
55% 180 mph (same)
45%
35%
25%
15% ??
Thanks!
Eric (40150 spending more time on my IFR than building...))
Message 36
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
We're down here in the camper now and are getting ready for a great week.
We have N416EC here and I will be hanging around it a fair bit as well as
going through the vendor tents. If there is anybody who isn't able to be
here and really wants to hear the updates on a certain product, let me know
and I will see what I can do. I have internet here, so will plan to keep up
on the list stuff in the evenings.
Do not archive.
Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation, Inc.
jesse@saintaviation.com
www.saintaviation.com
Cell: 352-427-0285
Fax: 815-377-3694
Message 37
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Is Eggenfellner there and has is he shipped any of his E6 turbos.
Thanks.
Dave Leikam
40496
----- Original Message -----
From: Jesse Saint
To: rv10-list@matronics.com
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 8:15 PM
Subject: RV10-List: Sun-N-Fun
We're down here in the camper now and are getting ready for a great
week. We have N416EC here and I will be hanging around it a fair bit as
well as going through the vendor tents. If there is anybody who isn't
able to be here and really wants to hear the updates on a certain
product, let me know and I will see what I can do. I have internet
here, so will plan to keep up on the list stuff in the evenings.
Do not archive.
Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation, Inc.
jesse@saintaviation.com
www.saintaviation.com
Cell: 352-427-0285
Fax: 815-377-3694
Message 38
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Everybody doing taxes?) |
Ron,
I believe Hi / Lo is avionics talk for positive / negative.
Jim
40134
In a message dated 4/16/2007 12:53:34 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
ron.mcgann@baesystems.com writes:
With all the tax prep being done, hopefully someone can help me with a
simple question.
Section 4.2.2.2 of the GNS430 installation manual refers to Lighting Bus Hi
and Lighting Bus Lo connections on P4001. Section 5.2.6 defines the lighting
config pages but does not dicsriminate between the Hi and Lo buses.
Assuming the Hi bus is connected to a 14V dimmer cct, what is Lighting Bus Lo
used
for?
cheers,
Ron
187 finishing
Jim "Scooter" McGrew
_http://www.mit.edu/~jsmcgrew_ (http://www.mit.edu/~jsmcgrew)
************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Message 39
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
jesse(at)saintaviation.co wrote:
> If there is anybody who isnt able to be here and really wants to hear the updates
on a certain product, let me know and I will see what I can do.
If you run across any EFIS info, right now the 2 things I am most interested in
is Great Plains new addition to its EFIS and if Dynon is going to match it in
the next by next summer when I plan on placing my order for the main unit, which
ever brand I go with.
--------
Gary Blankenbiller
RV10 - # 40674
(N410GB reserved)
do not archive
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=107474#107474
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|