RV10-List Digest Archive

Sun 07/29/07


Total Messages Posted: 32



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 02:13 AM - Re: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine would you buy? (The McGough Family)
     2. 05:26 AM - Re: Trim Problem with Ray Allen Relays (Wayne Edgerton)
     3. 05:51 AM - Re: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine would you buy? (Tim Olson)
     4. 06:30 AM - Re: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine would y (Michael Wellenzohn)
     5. 07:03 AM - Re: Re: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine would y (Tim Olson)
     6. 07:17 AM - OSH 07 ()
     7. 07:18 AM - Re: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine would you buy? (RV Builder (Michael Sausen))
     8. 07:18 AM - OSH 07 - Couple of pics ()
     9. 07:39 AM - Re: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine would yo (AirMike)
    10. 07:44 AM - WSI pricing changes with new Sirius System (Tim Olson)
    11. 08:08 AM - Re: Trim Problem with Ray Allen Relays (Tim Olson)
    12. 08:11 AM - Re: Re: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine would yo (Tim Olson)
    13. 08:23 AM - Re: WSI pricing changes with new Sirius System (N777TY)
    14. 08:42 AM - Re: How's things in Oz? (John W. Cox)
    15. 09:09 AM - Re: Re: WSI pricing changes with new Sirius System (Tim Olson)
    16. 09:10 AM - RV-10 HQ -Great Experience (Bob Leffler)
    17. 09:15 AM - Re: How's things in Oz? (Tim Olson)
    18. 09:27 AM - Re: Trim Problem with Ray Allen Relays (James Hein)
    19. 09:35 AM - Re: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine would you buy? (John W. Cox)
    20. 09:46 AM - Re: 51% rule update from OSH (John W. Cox)
    21. 09:55 AM - Re: RV-10 HQ -Great Experience (Dj Merrill)
    22. 09:57 AM - Please pass to Scott Reagan (GenGrumpy@aol.com)
    23. 10:05 AM - Re: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine would you buy? (John W. Cox)
    24. 10:09 AM - Re: Trim Problem with Ray Allen Relays (Tim Olson)
    25. 10:43 AM - Re: How's things in Oz? (Scott Schmidt)
    26. 01:08 PM - Re: Trim Problem with Ray Allen Relays (Vernon Smith)
    27. 01:25 PM - Re: How's things in Oz? (John W. Cox)
    28. 02:39 PM - Re: Trim Problem with Ray Allen Relays (Larry Rosen)
    29. 06:54 PM - Re: Trim Problem with Ray Allen Relays (Matt Dralle)
    30. 09:01 PM - How's things in Oz? (John Jessen)
    31. 09:18 PM - Re: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine would you buy? (Dave Leikam)
    32. 09:44 PM - Re: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine would you buy? (McGANN, Ron)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:13:49 AM PST US
    From: "The McGough Family" <VHMUM@bigpond.com>
    Subject: Re: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine would
    you buy? My first engine developed a slight oil leak at one of the cylinders. There fix was get it fixed anywhere I like and they will pay the bill. No dramas at all and could not ask for more I am in Australia regards Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kelly McMullen" <apilot2@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 9:53 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine would you buy? > > How does Aero Sport Power deal with warranty issues? Any concerns > bringing engine across the border? > > On 7/28/07, Mark Ritter <mritter509@msn.com> wrote: >> >> I am 100% happy with my IO-540 purchased from Bart at Aero Sport Power. >> Might be a good idea to do a little comparison shopping. Very nice folks >> to >> work with. >> >> Mark >> >> >> >> >> >From: Jesse Saint <jesse@saintaviation.com> >> >To: <rv10-list@matronics.com> >> >Subject: RE: RV10-List: If money were no object which Lycoming-style >> >engine >> > would you buy? >> >Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 12:31:31 -0500 >> > >> > >> > >From all my research and talking to people, BPA would be the way to >> > >go. >> > >> >Jesse Saint >> >Saint Aviation, Inc >> >jesse@saintaviation.com >> >www.saintaviation.com >> >352-427-0285 >> > >> >Leather interior kit for the RV-10 - >> >www.saintaviation.com/interior >> > >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: "jdalton77" <jdalton77@comcast.net> >> >To: rv10-list@matronics.com >> >Sent: 7/28/2007 11:23 AM >> >Subject: RV10-List: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine >> >would you buy? >> > >> >Is Barrett Precision Engines high price worth the money? Is it safer, >> >faster, stronger, lighter as advertised? >> >How about the Lycoming X series? >> >Others? >> > >> >If cost were not the main factor, but quality, reliability, safety, and >> >weight were, which would you like, regardless of cost? >> > >> >Jeff Dalton >> >Wings >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> _________________________________________________________________ >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:26:40 AM PST US
    From: "Wayne Edgerton" <wayne.e@grandecom.net>
    Subject: Re: Trim Problem with Ray Allen Relays
    HI Tim, I'm having the same problem with my trim. I though it was something we did wrong. I'm glad to hear there is a quick solution. Thanks for the heads up. Wayne Edgerton #40336 flying do not archive


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:51:46 AM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine would
    you buy? I've been 99% trouble free, but had lots of questions for Aerosport along the way and they always went way out to help me with anything. I had a nicked gasket under my oil pressure adjuster, and although they were just cheap parts and I told them I would just order some and replace them, they still insisted in sending me a couple. I wasn't sure of the size and they wanted to make sure that I got the right ones if my order was wrong. Not only that, but they included a kit with a couple of expendables that I'd need. Fantastic service. As for shipping, when I was getting engine quotes, for some reason the shipping cost to get the engine from them in Canada was far cheaper than the shipping cost to get it from the central US to Wisconsin. That was strange, but showed me that they must know what they're doing with deliveries. I picked it up at OSH and saved even that shipping though. Now that it's flown for 260 hours, I plan to do some test flights after cleaning my injectors and see how tightly matched I can get them. Bart's policy is that you can fly and get flow data on them, and he'll send you injectors to install to swap out a couple and you can just send them back if they work better. So you can get GAMI precision, with zero cost of swapping injectors. They also sold it with flow balanced injectors, and they seem to be very close after installation...the engine runs smooth LOP. So nothing against any other engine place. We all hear great things about BPA, and America's Aircraft Engines, but based on what I've seen this time around, I'm going back to Aerosport. In fact at OSH I asked rebuild questions just to get the long-term heads up, since it looks like this engine isn't going to last me 20 years at the rate I'm flying. ;) Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying do not archive The McGough Family wrote: > > My first engine developed a slight oil leak at one of the cylinders. > There fix was get it fixed anywhere I like and they will pay the bill. > No dramas at all and could not ask for more > > I am in Australia > > regards Chris > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kelly McMullen" <apilot2@gmail.com> > To: <rv10-list@matronics.com> > Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 9:53 AM > Subject: Re: RV10-List: If money were no object which Lycoming-style > engine would you buy? > > >> >> How does Aero Sport Power deal with warranty issues? Any concerns >> bringing engine across the border? >> >> On 7/28/07, Mark Ritter <mritter509@msn.com> wrote: >>> >>> I am 100% happy with my IO-540 purchased from Bart at Aero Sport Power. >>> Might be a good idea to do a little comparison shopping. Very nice >>> folks to >>> work with. >>> >>> Mark >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >From: Jesse Saint <jesse@saintaviation.com> >>> >To: <rv10-list@matronics.com> >>> >Subject: RE: RV10-List: If money were no object which Lycoming-style >>> >engine >>> > would you buy? >>> >Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 12:31:31 -0500 >>> > >>> > >>> > >From all my research and talking to people, BPA would be the way >>> to > >go. >>> > >>> >Jesse Saint >>> >Saint Aviation, Inc >>> >jesse@saintaviation.com >>> >www.saintaviation.com >>> >352-427-0285 >>> > >>> >Leather interior kit for the RV-10 - >>> >www.saintaviation.com/interior >>> > >>> >-----Original Message----- >>> >From: "jdalton77" <jdalton77@comcast.net> >>> >To: rv10-list@matronics.com >>> >Sent: 7/28/2007 11:23 AM >>> >Subject: RV10-List: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine >>> >would you buy? >>> > >>> >Is Barrett Precision Engines high price worth the money? Is it safer, >>> >faster, stronger, lighter as advertised? >>> >How about the Lycoming X series? >>> >Others? >>> > >>> >If cost were not the main factor, but quality, reliability, safety, and >>> >weight were, which would you like, regardless of cost? >>> > >>> >Jeff Dalton >>> >Wings >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> _________________________________________________________________ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:30:09 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine would
    y
    From: "Michael Wellenzohn" <rv-10@wellenzohn.net>
    I ordered a TMX-540 at Oshkosh. Anyone flying a ten with the TMX? Since I want to stay as close to the certified engine due to swiss regulations I chose Mattituck and they will support me to satisfy the swiss authorities with and provide all required documentation etc. (Tim sorry I couldn't meet you, Osh was overwhelming I hardly managed to see everything I had on my list. Hope your wife and daughters left some swiss chocolate for you too ;-)) Michael -------- RV-10 builder (wings) #511 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=126121#126121


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:03:27 AM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine
    would y Michael, yes, I'm sorry I didn't run into you either! They did leave me some Chocolate, that was great! It's very hard to accomplish anywhere near what you think you can when you go to OSH. I do know of at least 2 other -10 builders that bought TMX engines on the same day at OSH, so they're definitely another one of the popular ones, and most experiences I hear are positive as well. Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying do not archive Michael Wellenzohn wrote: > <rv-10@wellenzohn.net> > > I ordered a TMX-540 at Oshkosh. Anyone flying a ten with the TMX? > Since I want to stay as close to the certified engine due to swiss > regulations I chose Mattituck and they will support me to satisfy the > swiss authorities with and provide all required documentation etc. > > (Tim sorry I couldn't meet you, Osh was overwhelming I hardly managed > to see everything I had on my list. Hope your wife and daughters left > some swiss chocolate for you too ;-)) > > Michael > > -------- RV-10 builder (wings) #511 >


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:17:35 AM PST US
    From: <jim@CombsFive.Com>
    Subject: OSH 07
    Great trip! Can't wait to get my -10 in the air. Big thanks to Gary, Brenda, Adrian, Tim, Jessie and everyone else that set up the HQ space. Attached a few pictures. One note - The -10 taxi space needs to be made larger. Those 32 foot wings only had about 2 feet on each side. Having someone to walk the tips during taxi is not optional. Jim C 40192 Do Not Archive ===========================================================


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:18:28 AM PST US
    From: "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)" <rvbuilder@sausen.net>
    Subject: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine would
    you buy? As I have a Barrett engine I'm a bit biased, so take what I say with a gr ain of salt. ;-) But I spent a fair amount of time looking at the various engine builders out there and you can safely pick any one of them and proba bly never really have to worry. Aerosport was probably my second choice bu t I have a problem with sending money out of the country if I can support a company in the US without sacrificing quality or service. At the time I wa s shopping I also knew of one builder that had some problems with a rebuilt Aerosport having mismatched parts and they ended up going with a "new" exp erimental from them. But I'm sure that is the exception more than the rule . BPE's workmanship is absolutely top notch and they are always willing to answer your questions. When I looked at the engine builders out there, and compared the prices, the prices usually averaged out once you took what was included from one co mpared to what was extra from another. Don't just look at the sticker pric e, look at exactly what is included. Besides having an excellent reputatio n, Barrett will give you an honest answer to any question even if it might not be in their best interest. They also build competition winning engines for several big names so you know they can take a beating. Any of the 6 s hops that are authorized to build a new Lycoming "X" engine will be a good choice but Barrett won out for me. Michael Sausen -10 #352 Limbo From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@m atronics.com] On Behalf Of jdalton77 Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 11:24 AM Subject: RV10-List: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine wou ld you buy? Is Barrett Precision Engines high price worth the money? Is it safer, fast er, stronger, lighter as advertised? How about the Lycoming X series? Others? If cost were not the main factor, but quality, reliability, safety, and wei ght were, which would you like, regardless of cost? Jeff Dalton Wings


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:18:46 AM PST US
    From: <jim@CombsFive.Com>
    Subject: OSH 07 - Couple of pics
    Couple of pics Jim C 40192 Do Not Archive


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:39:24 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine would
    yo
    From: "AirMike" <Mikeabel@Pacbell.net>
    I just ordered the Mattituck IO-540 Red/Gold pkg at OSH. I just want a all new 260hp quality engine that I will not have any problems with. They had a great deal for the OSH crowd (-$500 plus free USA shipping) and they seem to be really behind the Red/Gold program. Their warranty is better than Lycoming's (3 yrs from engine start) and they are very flexible on the delivery (any time this year). The engine includes a lot of value added bells and whistles including irridium plugs. There were at least 3 RV10's at OSH with the Red?gold package from Mattituck. I never saw the aerosport or BPE booths at OSH, so I did not get their presentation, but they are there. Guess that I will just have to see how the engine runs and warranty support. -------- OSH '08 or Bust Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=126134#126134


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:44:08 AM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: WSI pricing changes with new Sirius System
    Got a sheet at OSH that listed the new service plans from WSI. They are now priced exactly as XM, which is to say lower with more features. Here's the rundown: $29.99/mo ($359/yr) WSI NOWrad Precipitation Type Dynamic Radar Coverage Mask Lightning METARs TAFs TFRs City Forecasts $49.99/mo ($599/yr) adds the following: Radar Summary Winds Aloft Temperatures Aloft Cloud Top (Satellite IR) International METARs * International TAFs * AIRMETs SIGMETs Surface Analysis Sever Storm Watch Boxes Canadian Radar, Coverage Mask Add-ons: $99/yr PIREPs and AIREPs - Can be added to either service I believe they are also planning to roll out some additional new features, but they haven't been announced as of yet. ------------------------ Another important Note: If you have an un-activated AV-100 or AV-200, you will want to activate it right away. They will still activate it later so you can upgrade, but apparently their legal department has some concerns over possible fraud that can happen and they'd like to close the doors on the problem by getting them activated very soon. -- Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying do not archive


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:08:49 AM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: Trim Problem with Ray Allen Relays
    Just got word from Vic that he replaced his MAC relay last year too, and now he *thinks* it's happening again (at least once). That would seem to show a trend...he's got over 400 hours, and I've got 260 and Scott in the low 200's I think. So it looks like perhaps the REL-1's will only go so long and you'll start having them stick. The prudent thing would be to replace them before that happens. Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying do not archive Wayne Edgerton wrote: > HI Tim, > > I'm having the same problem with my trim. I though it was something we > did wrong. I'm glad to hear there is a quick solution. > > Thanks for the heads up. > > Wayne Edgerton #40336 > > flying > > do not archive > > *


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:11:42 AM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine
    would yo Great deal! But, Let's all be hoping that nobody has to get a chance to see the warranty support. ;) So far from the sounds of it, everyone's RV-10 engine from these few dealers has been a very very good experience. Now if we can only keep the pilots skills and attitudes under control we should show a very good damage track record as well. Hope to see about 40 at OSH2008. It's been running at about 25% of the flying number so far, so that seems reasonable by that time. Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying do not archive AirMike wrote: > > I just ordered the Mattituck IO-540 Red/Gold pkg at OSH. I just want > a all new 260hp quality engine that I will not have any problems > with. They had a great deal for the OSH crowd (-$500 plus free USA > shipping) and they seem to be really behind the Red/Gold program. > Their warranty is better than Lycoming's (3 yrs from engine start) > and they are very flexible on the delivery (any time this year). The > engine includes a lot of value added bells and whistles including > irridium plugs. There were at least 3 RV10's at OSH with the Red?gold > package from Mattituck. I never saw the aerosport or BPE booths at > OSH, so I did not get their presentation, but they are there. > > Guess that I will just have to see how the engine runs and warranty > support. > > -------- OSH '08 or Bust >


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:23:18 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: WSI pricing changes with new Sirius System
    From: "N777TY" <microsmurfer@yahoo.com>
    Just curious -- did they talk about how this will all play out when they merge with XM? will they still have two systems (I guess it wouldn't make sense)? -------- RV-7A N777TY (res) Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=126147#126147


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:42:27 AM PST US
    Subject: How's things in Oz?
    From: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox@pacificnw.com>
    The great story on Epic is how they computer stretched the Lancair IVP 50% to get to the Epic LT and now Lancair has unveiled their new improved four passenger that is an Epic shrunk 49%. The new Lancair sure has a powerful PW turbo prop up front. Mecca was amazing for RV-10s. Scott's should be in the November issue of AOPA. Jesse has a great interior package. Tim's plane flies great. Wonderful builders. Lopresti's seminar on cowl design shows the James brothers are truly from the south. Lots of new electronics. "Miss Piggy" the RV-12 mockup is still not ready for primetime. Cessna and Cirrus will take the certified portion. Many builders were interested but all the hoopla on an emerging market is still not documented. The Russian M-12 was interesting and if you can pull the Jabiru option off and install Rotax 914 turbos, it could be interesting. Back home. John #600 ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Jessen Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 5:03 PM Subject: RV10-List: How's things in Oz? It's rather quiet out there, don't you think? Did the land of Oz swallow up everyone? There's got to be some wifi to use to get reports out. Must be having too much fun. Hey, JC, how about something on Epic? Or how about a thought on how the Cirrus and Cessna entrees into LSA just blew the RV-12 out of the water, if it was ever in the water, given the stall issues. Come on, fellows, gals, set the beer bottles down just for a second and type us poor souls a note! John Jessen #40328, and not in the land of Oz. do not archive


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:09:11 AM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: WSI pricing changes with new Sirius System
    From everything I hear so far, nobody's making plans to merge systems yet. WSI is actively contracted with Avidyne to have their receivers built, and they're taking quite the hit swapping them for free, so it's doubtful that they'll be too interested in quickly swapping them for some other system. Also, in talking to at least Chelton, the more "certified" systems have a concern in that right now WSI is the only one that actually provides a system with a constant and known interface. XM is out there in many various forms, but you can only count on it working in the certified world if you have a known system. That's why Garmin's stuff relies on their own receiver. So the fact that you get a known interface keeps WSI attractive in the certified world that isn't Garmin. So there really isn't much talk on what's going to happen down the road. The installed base on both sides is too significant to ignore if they decided to merge technologies. In the end, they may just stay split on the datalink systems...nobody knows. Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying do not archive N777TY wrote: > > Just curious -- did they talk about how this will all play out when > they merge with XM? will they still have two systems (I guess it > wouldn't make sense)? > > -------- RV-7A N777TY (res) >


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:10:31 AM PST US
    From: "Bob Leffler" <rvmail@thelefflers.com>
    Subject: RV-10 HQ -Great Experience
    I am just now getting to the thousands of emails that I purposefully neglected while at OSH. I did want to share my appreciation and thanks to all that were at the RV-10 HQ and other RV related activities this past week. I especially want to thank Susan and Brenda for putting up will all of us and keeping everyone well fed. I also want to thank them for allowing Bob and Gary to arrive early and reserve all our spaces. Without Bob's and Gary's effort, I know my OSH experience would have been the same. As a builder that is just starting, I learned a wealth of information from the many informal gatherings that took place at RV-10. I want to thank everyone for making both Brad and myself fell welcomed. My trip home yesterday was a little more tense that my perfect trip to OSH. Originally, I had an IFR reservation at 9:30 to depart. I filed IFR to be talking to ATC over the lake and because the wx in Ohio was going to be marginal. When I talked to FSS in the morning, they said that I had nothing to worry about and it should be good vfr all the way home. ATC was giving an eta of 60-90 minutes for engine starts for IFR departures. Based upon our FSS briefing and the delays, Brad and I decided to depart VFR. No big deal until we got to the other side of Lake Michigan. The 7000 scattered soon became 3500 broken, with visibility dropping to 3-4 miles. We thought about going above the broken layer, but decided against since the clouds were building vertically very quickly. Unfortunately, when we were about half way between Fort Wayne and Toledo, the ceiling and visibility started to drop considerably. Thankfully ATC wasn't busy and I filed IFR for the rest of the trip. I spent the next hour in hard IFR until I broke out on the approach at KOSU. This was the first time that I had been in hard IFR conditions since I got the rating and the first time that I was without an instructor. Most of my experience has just been popping up and down through the cloud layer. It got tense for a few moments, but I kept telling myself to keep the scan going and do what I was taught. Other than getting home a little more stressed out than planned, everything turned out for the best. Had I had a little more recent experience, I'm sure I would have been less stressed out. If there is any advice I can share for anyone with a newly minted IFR rating is to get as much experience in real IFR conditions as you can. I've rambled enough about my trip home. I was fortunate enough to meet many new friends and fellow RV-10 builders of which the list is too long to mention. Based upon the comments from Brad and myself, my wife has already made a decision that we'll both be there next year as long as I rent a RV for camping. We are already counting down the days until we see everyone again next year. bob


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:15:24 AM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: How's things in Oz?
    I didn't really see anything in the 4 large hangars that qualified as "revolutionary" this year. It was all just incremental improvements in the various existing market. I continue to be surprised though that there's even a market for lots of VLJ's. Also, after thinking about it a bit, I don't know if I'm interested in the RV-12 at all anymore. It's pretty ugly to look at, and the Sonex seems to be more aerobatically inclined. No, I haven't quite started a serious hunt to buy another kit, but have been toying around with the idea of building an aerobatic 2 seater to play with and perhaps give it to my dad to use as "his" airplane much of the year. I might be up for a quick building kit. Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying do not archive John W. Cox wrote: > The great story on Epic is how they computer stretched the Lancair IVP > 50% to get to the Epic LT and now Lancair has unveiled their new > improved four passenger that is an Epic shrunk 49%. The new Lancair > sure has a powerful PW turbo prop up front. > > > > Mecca was amazing for RV-10s. Scotts should be in the November issue > of AOPA. Jesse has a great interior package. Tims plane flies great. > Wonderful builders. Loprestis seminar on cowl design shows the James > brothers are truly from the south. > > > > Lots of new electronics. > > > > Miss Piggy the RV-12 mockup is still not ready for primetime. Cessna > and Cirrus will take the certified portion. Many builders were > interested but all the hoopla on an emerging market is still not > documented. The Russian M-12 was interesting and if you can pull the > Jabiru option off and install Rotax 914 turbos, it could be interesting. > > > > Back home. > > > > John #600 > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *John Jessen > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 25, 2007 5:03 PM > *To:* rv10-list@matronics.com > *Subject:* RV10-List: How's things in Oz? > > > > It's rather quiet out there, don't you think? Did the land of Oz > swallow up everyone? There's got to be some wifi to use to get reports > out. Must be having too much fun. > > > > Hey, JC, how about something on Epic? Or how about a thought on how the > Cirrus and Cessna entrees into LSA just blew the RV-12 out of the water, > if it was ever in the water, given the stall issues. Come on, fellows, > gals, set the beer bottles down just for a second and type us poor souls > a note! > > > > John Jessen > > #40328, and not in the land of Oz. > > > > do not archive > > * * > > * * > > ** > > ** > > ** > > ** > > ** > > ** > > *http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List* > > ** > > ** > > ** > > *http://forums.matronics.com* > > ** > > * * > > * > > > *


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:27:24 AM PST US
    From: James Hein <n8vim@arrl.net>
    Subject: Re: Trim Problem with Ray Allen Relays
    Hey Y'all... I'm an EE, and one question keeps popping into my head on the relay issue: Why are you using a *mechanical* relay? Does it give you any advantage over a solid-state relay or equivalent circuit? Just curious... Neither right or wrong implied.... -Jim 40384 (just unpacking fuselage kit between downpours.. Woohoo!) Tim Olson wrote: > > Just got word from Vic that he replaced his MAC relay last year too, > and now he *thinks* it's happening again (at least once). That > would seem to show a trend...he's got over 400 hours, and I've got > 260 and Scott in the low 200's I think. So it looks like perhaps > the REL-1's will only go so long and you'll start having them > stick. The prudent thing would be to replace them before that > happens. > > Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying > do not archive > > > Wayne Edgerton wrote: > >> HI Tim, >> >> I'm having the same problem with my trim. I though it was something >> we did wrong. I'm glad to hear there is a quick solution. >> >> Thanks for the heads up. >> >> Wayne Edgerton #40336 >> >> flying >> >> do not archive >> >> * > >


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:35:11 AM PST US
    Subject: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine would
    you buy?
    From: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox@pacificnw.com>
    Until you place in print where each of the Lycoming based vendors document their product. We are waiting on apples, oranges, tangerines and kiwis as a discussion point. It is damned difficult to answer. In defense of clarity, which of the alternatives to Barrett, provide an owner with a documented Dyno run to establish the pig in a poke? To what gram weight is each component balanced. When a builder does not care, then Barrett is indeed more expensive. Another standard is which airshow performers use which RV-10 engine builder? Which rebuilder gives a complete set of documents, CDROMS and blueprints? OSH was a pretty fair playing field to get those questions answered. For price alone, Aerosport has a lot of engines flying in RV-10s. To avoid being coy. I selected Barrett, John Forsling and a Lopresti style cowl a long time ago and little has swayed my decision since. James is no LoPresti cowl. If Money were not object - the subject line question. BPAE. John Cox - 600 ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of jdalton77 Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 9:24 AM Subject: RV10-List: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine would you buy? Is Barrett Precision Engines high price worth the money? Is it safer, faster, stronger, lighter as advertised? How about the Lycoming X series? Others? If cost were not the main factor, but quality, reliability, safety, and weight were, which would you like, regardless of cost? Jeff Dalton Wings


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:46:35 AM PST US
    Subject: 51% rule update from OSH
    From: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox@pacificnw.com>
    I hope and pray each night before I go to bed, that the individuals on the committee take swift and clear action to protect individual builders rights. Hearing "Two weeks to Taxi" at OSH and my neck begins to swell. Then again, should the FAA reconsider Quick Build kit definitions. Not if the builder actually can demonstrate through action and verbal answer that "They built it for their own education". The question will be how much final assembly composite work can companies like Lancair and Epic bring into their Factory Assist Programs and away from untrained hired guns. Should we restrict Builder Assist and deprive all the fat cats of their "money can buy anything lifestyle"? I am not getting my hopes up when the wolves are guarding the Hen House. But thanks Bob for thinking Van is looking after the little guys in their garages. John Cox Do Not Archive -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bob Leffler Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 2:22 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: 51% rule update from OSH Van made an interesting comment at the banquet the other night. He basically stated if you paying somebody to build your aircraft, you better get it done quick. You can read into that whatever you choose.


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:55:04 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: RV-10 HQ -Great Experience
    From: Dj Merrill <deej@deej.net>
    I had a great time as well, and would also like to thank those that helped to setup the camping. The most fun part of the trip for me was just hanging out and chatting about airplanes, although I was mighty disappointed to find out we weren't "Real Pilots"... ;-) -Dj do not archive -- Dj Merrill Sportsman 2+2 Builder #7118 http://econ.duke.edu/~deej/sportsman/ "Many things that are unexplainable happen during the construction of an airplane." --Dave Prizio, 30 Aug 2005


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:57:35 AM PST US
    From: GenGrumpy@aol.com
    Subject: Please pass to Scott Reagan
    Scott, I stopped by the booth at Osh on Wed hoping to find that Jepp is going to price the nav / obst data for Chelton Sports more reasonably this year. I was disappointed to hear from the lady I talked with that the price is not only NOT going down, but is planned to go UP! C'mon, Jepp. Please get real for those of us in the Chelton world, both the certified and sport versions! Price these database updates as competitively as the ones for my G-430!!! Here's hoping we see some reasonable pricing soon! John Miller ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:05:12 AM PST US
    Subject: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine would
    you buy?
    From: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox@pacificnw.com>
    The Aero Sport people are "First Rate" with a great track record. Probably because their's have not been any major problems, consumers have no idea trying to use US attorneys to recover restitution from Canadian barristers. I hear you need to be a blood relative of the Queen. Good people, no problem. Cheap products, quick sale artists and you will get a quick lesson in International trade. Tread carefully with international copies who do not have a US presence so you can file in US courts if you believe you are harmed. Great query. John Do not Archive -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Kelly McMullen Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 4:54 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine would you buy? How does Aero Sport Power deal with warranty issues? Any concerns bringing engine across the border?


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:09:25 AM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: Trim Problem with Ray Allen Relays
    Jim, Man, while I agree with you, it's a tough one to call, because either way you can have a failure. I guess I'm just as uncomfortable having one than the other, but right now there isn't a commercial alternative that is in ready-to-use form, and I myself will be happy to just snip and solder to get it working well. From the sounds of it, they've been abusing and testing the heck out of their REL-2, so I would hope we wouldn't continue to see issues after that swap. If someone came out with a pretty foolproof commercial solid state relay for the task, complete with interchangeable wire harness, I'd probably look at it too. I'm a build-it-yourself guy, but on this one I'm not only lazy, but I'd want to see someone's schematic first. Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying do not archive James Hein wrote: > > Hey Y'all... > > I'm an EE, and one question keeps popping into my head on the relay issue: > > Why are you using a *mechanical* relay? Does it give you any advantage > over a solid-state relay or equivalent circuit? > > Just curious... Neither right or wrong implied.... > > -Jim 40384 (just unpacking fuselage kit between downpours.. Woohoo!) > > Tim Olson wrote: > >> >> Just got word from Vic that he replaced his MAC relay last year too, >> and now he *thinks* it's happening again (at least once). That >> would seem to show a trend...he's got over 400 hours, and I've got >> 260 and Scott in the low 200's I think. So it looks like perhaps >> the REL-1's will only go so long and you'll start having them >> stick. The prudent thing would be to replace them before that >> happens. >> >> Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying >> do not archive >> >> >> Wayne Edgerton wrote: >> >>> HI Tim, >>> >>> I'm having the same problem with my trim. I though it was something >>> we did wrong. I'm glad to hear there is a quick solution. >>> >>> Thanks for the heads up. >>> >>> Wayne Edgerton #40336 >>> >>> flying >>> >>> do not archive >>> >>> * >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >


    Message 25


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:43:00 AM PST US
    From: Scott Schmidt <scottmschmidt@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: How's things in Oz?
    My thoughts are very similar. I had a friend from Salt Lake show up Saturda y morning while I was leaving and he and his son only had Saturday and half of Sunday to look around and wanted to know what he should look at. That was a hard one because like Tim said, I didn't see anything at Oshkosh that I am dying for. Oshkosh had a feeling that the "middle class" is starting to go away. Light Sport aircraft was being pushed by the EAA, and 4 place turbines / jets were popping up everywhere. So you had the $25,000 Sonex and the $1MM dollar Evolution / Eclipse / Epic / Cirrus. I was amazed at how many of the Cessna Light Sport aircraft were pre-sold. I think the la st number I heard was somewhere in the 500's. That is a $100,000 + dollar aircraft and is basically a newer 152. =0AIn the four / five place single engine category I was very impressed with the Diamond Aircraft DA50. It ap peared to have good room, great visibility and huge storage with a 1320 lb. useful load. But for $600,000+ it also had a big price tag. =0AFor EFIS systems, I didn't see anything that made me jealous. I played with the OP EFIS a little but would like to see a head to head Chelton / OP fly-off. Ga rmin is doing a great job too. =0ANothing really great in engines other than the standard Lycoming still appears to be the only reliable choice. T he rotary engine was cool but I kept thinking to myself, why? New engine d evelopment must be fueled by Jet A if it is going to have a chance of displ acing the standard Lycoming. SMA may have something in a few more years th ough. =0AThis was the first year that Burt Rutan wasn't there giving a foru m ( I'm pretty sure). Heard he sold Scaled Composites and probably is off buying a ride to space from the Russians. =0A =0AThis was also the most cro wded Oshkosh ever. The camp grounds were completely full and the ATIS for a few days said there was no more room for airplanes unless you were a home built or vintage aircraft. Every spot of grass had an airplane on it. The economy over the past 5 years has been incredible and I think the type of aircraft that are being developed show it and the number of people who are interested in aviation is growing. By Sunday night (before Oshkosh even be gan) the campground was full all the way to the main road where you enter i nto the campground. =0AI also learned something new this year, Oshkosh rea lly starts on Sunday. I bought all my shirts on Sunday, the grounds were v ery crowded and 80% of the planes were already there. =0A =0AIt appears th at a level of saturation is occurring. The growth areas really are new pil ots who are going to buy light sport aircraft and 4 place turbines that wil l go into air taxi service where there isn't any additional pilots added to the current 600,000 just new passengers. =0A =0AThe RV-10 amazed me even more after this trip. For the price of a Cessna Light Sport you can have f our seats, cruise at 170 knots and have a plane that is fun to fly with gre at visibility. =0A =0AScott Schmidt=0Ascottmschmidt@yahoo.com =0A=0A=0A=0A ----- Original Message ----=0AFrom: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>=0ATo: rv10-l ist@matronics.com=0ASent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 10:13:02 AM=0ASubject: Re: Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>=0A=0AI didn't really see anything in the 4 large ha ngars that qualified as=0A"revolutionary" this year. It was all just incre mental improvements in=0Athe various existing market. I continue to be sur prised though that=0Athere's even a market for lots of VLJ's.=0A=0AAlso, af ter thinking about it a bit, I don't know if I'm interested=0Ain the RV-12 at all anymore. It's pretty ugly to look at, and=0Athe Sonex seems to be m ore aerobatically inclined. No, I haven't=0Aquite started a serious hunt t o buy another kit, but have been=0Atoying around with the idea of building an aerobatic 2 seater=0Ato play with and perhaps give it to my dad to use a s "his" airplane=0Amuch of the year. I might be up for a quick building ki t.=0A=0ATim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying=0Ado not archive=0A=0A=0AJohn W. Cox wrote:=0A> The great story on Epic is how they computer stretched the L ancair IVP =0A> 50% to get to the Epic LT and now Lancair has unveiled thei r new =0A> improved four passenger that is an Epic shrunk 49%. The new Lan cair =0A> sure has a powerful PW turbo prop up front.=0A> =0A> =0A> =0A> M ecca was amazing for RV-10s. Scott=92s should be in the November issue =0A > of AOPA. Jesse has a great interior package. Tim=92s plane flies great. =0A> Wonderful builders. Lopresti=92s seminar on cowl design shows the J ames =0A> brothers are truly from the south.=0A> =0A> =0A> =0A> Lots of ne w electronics.=0A> =0A> =0A> =0A> =93Miss Piggy=94 the RV-12 mockup is sti ll not ready for primetime. Cessna =0A> and Cirrus will take the certified portion. Many builders were =0A> interested but all the hoopla on an emerg ing market is still not =0A> documented. The Russian M-12 was interesting and if you can pull the =0A> Jabiru option off and install Rotax 914 turbos , it could be interesting.=0A> =0A> =0A> =0A> Back home.=0A> =0A> =0A> =0A> John #600=0A> =0A> =0A> =0A> ---------------------------------------- --------------------------------=0A> =0A> *From:* owner-rv10-list-server@ma tronics.com =0A> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf O f *John Jessen=0A> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 25, 2007 5:03 PM=0A> *To:* rv10- list@matronics.com=0A> *Subject:* RV10-List: How's things in Oz?=0A> =0A> =0A> =0A> It's rather quiet out there, don't you think? Did the land of Oz =0A> swallow up everyone? There's got to be some wifi to use to get repor ts =0A> out. Must be having too much fun. =0A> =0A> =0A> =0A> Hey, JC, ho w about something on Epic? Or how about a thought on how the =0A> Cirrus a nd Cessna entrees into LSA just blew the RV-12 out of the water, =0A> if it was ever in the water, given the stall issues. Come on, fellows, =0A> gal s, set the beer bottles down just for a second and type us poor souls =0A> a note! =0A> =0A> =0A> =0A> John Jessen=0A> =0A> #40328, and not in the land of Oz. =0A> =0A> =0A> =0A> do not archive=0A> =0A> * *=0A> =0A> * * =0A> =0A> **=0A> =0A> **=0A> =0A> **=0A> =0A> **=0A> =0A> **=0A> =0A> **=0A > =0A> *http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List*=0A> =0A> **=0A> =0A> **=0A> =0A> **=0A> =0A> *http://forums.matronics.com*=0A> =0A> **=0A> =0A> =========


    Message 26


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:08:07 PM PST US
    From: Vernon Smith <planesmith@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Trim Problem with Ray Allen Relays
    In Ray Allen's documentation, that comes with the 207 hand grip, it shows a way to direct wire the stick controls without the rely. However, if a seco nd grip or the panel mounted rocker switch is used the alternative shown is a DPDT switch that transfers the function for one control stick to the ot her or panel rocker switch. Not as elegant as the relays but it is an optio n. Vern Smith #324 fuselage systems > Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 12:06:40 -0500> From: Tim@MyRV10.com> To: rv10-li st@matronics.com> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Trim Problem with Ray Allen Relay Man, while I agree with you, it's a tough one to call, because either> way you can have a failure. I guess I'm just as uncomfortable> having one than the other, but right now there isn't a commercial> alternative that is in ready-to-use form, and I myself will be> happy to just snip and solder to g et it working well. From the> sounds of it, they've been abusing and testin g the heck out of> their REL-2, so I would hope we wouldn't continue to see issues> after that swap. If someone came out with a pretty foolproof> comm ercial solid state relay for the task, complete with> interchangeable wire harness, I'd probably look at it too.> I'm a build-it-yourself guy, but on this one I'm not only lazy, but> I'd want to see someone's schematic first. > > Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying> do not archive> > > James Hein wrote y Y'all...> > > > I'm an EE, and one question keeps popping into my head on the relay issue:> > > > Why are you using a *mechanical* relay? Does it gi ve you any advantage > > over a solid-state relay or equivalent circuit?> > > > Just curious... Neither right or wrong implied....> > > > -Jim 40384 ( just unpacking fuselage kit between downpours.. Woohoo!)> > > > Tim Olson w >>> >> Just got word from Vic that he replaced his MAC relay last year too, > >> and now he *thinks* it's happening again (at least once). That> >> wou ld seem to show a trend...he's got over 400 hours, and I've got> >> 260 and Scott in the low 200's I think. So it looks like perhaps> >> the REL-1's w ill only go so long and you'll start having them> >> stick. The prudent thi ng would be to replace them before that> >> happens.> >>> >> Tim Olson - RV -10 N104CD - Flying> >> do not archive> >>> >>> >> Wayne Edgerton wrote:> > >> >>> HI Tim,> >>> > >>> I'm having the same problem with my trim. I thoug h it was something > >>> we did wrong. I'm glad to hear there is a quick so lution.> >>> > >>> Thanks for the heads up.> >>> > >>> Wayne Edgerton #4033 6> >>> > >>> flying> >>> > >>> do not archive> >>>> >>> *> >>> >>> >>> >>> ====================> > > _________________________________________________________________ Don't get caught with egg on your face. Play Chicktionary!-- http://club.live.com/chicktionary.aspx?icid=chick_wlmailtextlink


    Message 27


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:25:17 PM PST US
    Subject: How's things in Oz?
    From: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox@pacificnw.com>
    I ditto Scott and Tim's comments. Although I had the privilege of flying a Fighter/Trainer into OSH which qualified for free admission and a free parking pass, the Free dissolved quickly with the cost of 100LL to get both ways. KUAO-KOSH-KUAO. Our usual Air Combat / Formation Training at KMTW looks like that is passing into the History Books. Next year will be the Fiftieth of the Nanchang CJ-6/Yak so it may be the last year for lots of those as well. I was also able to get Paul Grimstad and Deems a perspective of OSH from the air and what the warbirds were about. The turbine and turbo-props will have to be "Certified" to see Air Taxi operation. Angel Flight has already reached board consistence not to allow carriage of passengers in Amateur built aircraft. Not enough buyers are going to fund the Factory Assist Kit Built over $1,000,000 pursuit, but it remains fun to watch. I know that Dave Martin, former editor of Kitplanes, turned in his medical and went Sport Pilot, but then he gets to fly over 100 types as an author. I don't have any other over 55 year old pilots considering the intoxication of the EAA screams of Light Sport coming. I still cannot find the fire for all the smoke and commotion stirred by the EAA for Sport Pilot privileges. Bar NONE, the RV-10 is still the finest kit for the money when equipped with Dual EFIS and IFR Cross Country capability. Their were six beauties to look at, Scott and Rene still have a right to grin and Tim's was an unforgettable pleasure to bank with a full load of builders "On Board" Lots of sharing of ideas, great comradery, the weather was fine (for Wisconsin) and it became a most enjoyable week. I already saw signs that some EFIS manufacturers will fade away in the next three years. BMA won't even support a brand new unit of three years ago as it labeled its own product obsolete with no replacement parts into the future. Much became a rehash of the excitement in years passed. Kent White, the metal smith guru, was a total no show, three other instructors of seminars were never there and the topics left with crowds waiting in chairs. ATS and other tool suppliers did not offer the significant Daily Special Discounts of years past. Several speakers were poorly prepared yet LoPresti is coming to market with their own wingtips, landing lights and engine cowl specifically for the RV-10 market. The airshow each day was a yawner except for the cold one consumed just outside the security fence while we watched and listened to EAA -AM radio 1510. All in all, everything waits on the 51% committee to make their final recommendation to save the Lil Guys or sell them out to the Two Weeks to Taxi hired professionals. OSH 2007 was all about the great people that make building for Education and Pleasure so much fun. John Cox > > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *John Jessen > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 25, 2007 5:03 PM > *To:* rv10-list@matronics.com > *Subject:* RV10-List: How's things in Oz? > > > > It's rather quiet out there, don't you think? Did the land of Oz > swallow up everyone? There's got to be some wifi to use to get reports > out. Must be having too much fun. > > > > Hey, JC, how about something on Epic? Or how about a thought on how the > Cirrus and Cessna entrees into LSA just blew the RV-12 out of the water, > if it was ever in the water, given the stall issues. Come on, fellows, > gals, set the beer bottles down just for a second and type us poor souls > a note! > > > > John Jessen > > #40328, and not in the land of Oz. > > > > do not archive > > * * > > * * > > ** > > ** > > ** > > ** > > ** > > ** > > *http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List* > > ** > > ** > > ** > > *http://forums.matronics.com <http://forums.matronics.com/> * > > ** > > * * > > * > > > * <B --> http://forums.matronics.com</=============> <http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-Listsp;--------%20 NEW%20MATRONICS%20WEB%20FORUMS%20-%3cBhttp://forums.matronics.com/> <http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-Listsp;--------%20 NEW%20MATRONICS%20WEB%20FORUMS%20-%3cBhttp://forums.matronics.com/>


    Message 28


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:39:16 PM PST US
    From: Larry Rosen <LarryRosen@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: Trim Problem with Ray Allen Relays
    Aircraft Extras has a relay board for the Ray Allen relays. <http://www.aircraftextras.com/RelayBoard1.htm> Any experience out there with these relays. Just about ready to mount the pair I have. -- Larry Rosen RV-10 #356 http://lrosen.nerv10.com


    Message 29


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:54:09 PM PST US
    From: Matt Dralle <dralle@matronics.com>
    Subject: Re: Trim Problem with Ray Allen Relays
    At 02:35 PM 7/29/2007 Sunday, you wrote: > >Aircraft Extras has a relay board for the Ray Allen relays. ><http://www.aircraftextras.com/RelayBoard1.htm> >Any experience out there with these relays. Just about ready to mount the pair I have. > >-- >Larry Rosen >RV-10 #356 >http://lrosen.nerv10.com > Our Matronics Governor MkIII does a similar function and includes speed control in a small, reliable package: http://www.matronics.com/governor/ There are over 1000 RVs flying with the Governor MkIII! Best regards, Matt Dralle Matronics Matt G Dralle | Matronics | PO Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551 925-606-1001 V | 925-606-6281 F | dralle@matronics.com Email http://www.matronics.com/ WWW | Featuring Products For Aircraft


    Message 30


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:01:59 PM PST US
    Subject: How's things in Oz?
    From: John Jessen <n212pj@gmail.com>
    I'm disappointed by the lack of news of any substance out of OSH. Everyday I'd check the familiar news sources and see very little in the way of new and potentially interesting up ticks to many of the products that I've been following. I was hoping to hear what new portable GPS Garmin was going to put out, given that many of us in the market for a 496 are now waiting for the other shoe to drop, given the recent reduction in prices. I was also waiting to hear more about Rob's new software, but not much about that (did anyone see it and was it more than what his web site shows?). I hope to finally get to Oz next year. Never been, and if I wait until the -10 is finished, well, I do want to get there before the next ice age. So, save me a place. John J #328. do not archive _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John W. Cox Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 1:22 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: How's things in Oz? I ditto Scott and Tim=92s comments. Although I had the privilege of flying a Fighter/Trainer into OSH which qualified for free admission and a free parking pass, the Free dissolved quickly with the cost of 100LL to get both ways. KUAO-KOSH-KUAO. Our usual Air Combat / Formation Training at KMTW looks like that is passing into the History Books. Next year will be the Fiftieth of the Nanchang CJ-6/Yak so it may be the last year for lots of those as well. I was also able to get Paul Grimstad and Deems a perspective of OSH from the air and what the warbirds were about. The turbine and turbo-props will have to be =93Certified=94 to see Air Taxi operation. Angel Flight has already reached board consistence not to allow carriage of passengers in Amateur built aircraft. Not enough buyers are going to fund the Factory Assist Kit Built over $1,000,000 pursuit, but it remains fun to watch. I know that Dave Martin, former editor of Kitplanes, turned in his medical and went Sport Pilot, but then he gets to fly over 100 types as an author. I don=92t have any other over 55 year old pilots considering the intoxication of the EAA screams of Light Sport coming. I still cannot find the fire for all the smoke and commotion stirred by the EAA for Sport Pilot privileges. Bar NONE, the RV-10 is still the finest kit for the money when equipped with Dual EFIS and IFR Cross Country capability. Their were six beauties to look at, Scott and Rene still have a right to grin and Tim=92s was an unforgettable pleasure to bank with a full load of builders =93On Board=94 Lots of sharing of ideas, great comradery, the weather was fine (for Wisconsin) and it became a most enjoyable week. I already saw signs that some EFIS manufacturers will fade away in the next three years. BMA won=92t even support a brand new unit of three years ago as it labeled its own product obsolete with no replacement parts into the future. Much became a rehash of the excitement in years passed. Kent White, the metal smith guru, was a total no show, three other instructors of seminars were never there and the topics left with crowds waiting in chairs. ATS and other tool suppliers did not offer the significant Daily Special Discounts of years past. Several speakers were poorly prepared yet LoPresti is coming to market with their own wingtips, landing lights and engine cowl specifically for the RV-10 market. The airshow each day was a yawner except for the cold one consumed just outside the security fence while we watched and listened to EAA 'AM radio 1510. All in all, everything waits on the 51% committee to make their final recommendation to save the Lil Guys or sell them out to the Two Weeks to Taxi hired professionals. OSH 2007 was all about the great people that make building for Education and Pleasure so much fun. John Cox > > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *John Jessen > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 25, 2007 5:03 PM > *To:* rv10-list@matronics.com > *Subject:* RV10-List: How's things in Oz? > > > > It's rather quiet out there, don't you think? Did the land of Oz > swallow up everyone? There's got to be some wifi to use to get reports > out. Must be having too much fun. > > > > Hey, JC, how about something on Epic? Or how about a thought on how the > Cirrus and Cessna entrees into LSA just blew the RV-12 out of the water, > if it was ever in the water, given the stall issues. Come on, fellows, > gals, set the beer bottles down just for a second and type us poor souls > a note! > > > > John Jessen > > #40328, and not in the land of Oz. > > > > do not archive > > * * > > * * > > ** > > ** > > ** > > ** > > ** > > ** > > *http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List* > > ** > > ** > > ** > > *http://forums.matronics.com <http://forums.matronics.com/> * > > ** > > * * > > * > > > * <B --> http://forums.matronics.com</=============> <http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-Listsp; -%20NEW%20MATRONICS%20WEB%20FORUMS%20-%3cBhttp://forums.matronics.com/> <http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-Listsp; -%20NEW%20MATRONICS%20WEB%20FORUMS%20-%3cBhttp://forums.matronics.com/> href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronic s.com /Navigator?RV10-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com


    Message 31


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:18:14 PM PST US
    From: "Dave Leikam" <DAVELEIKAM@wi.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine would
    you buy? One thing I came away with from this years show is that I am going to install an IO-540 of some kind. BPA or AeroSport both look good. I appreciate all the posts on this subject because I was about to ask the same question. I am no longer on the fence about alternatives. The only question now is certified or experimental? Dave Leikam 40496 QB Wings ----- Original Message ----- From: John W. Cox To: rv10-list@matronics.com Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 10:32 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine would you buy? Until you place in print where each of the Lycoming based vendors document their product. We are waiting on apples, oranges, tangerines and kiwis as a discussion point. It is damned difficult to answer. In defense of clarity, which of the alternatives to Barrett, provide an owner with a documented Dyno run to establish the pig in a poke? To what gram weight is each component balanced. When a builder does not care, then Barrett is indeed more expensive. Another standard is which airshow performers use which RV-10 engine builder? Which rebuilder gives a complete set of documents, CDROMS and blueprints? OSH was a pretty fair playing field to get those questions answered. For price alone, Aerosport has a lot of engines flying in RV-10s. To avoid being coy. I selected Barrett, John Forsling and a Lopresti style cowl a long time ago and little has swayed my decision since. James is no LoPresti cowl. If Money were not object - the subject line question. BPAE. John Cox - 600 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of jdalton77 Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 9:24 AM To: rv10-list@matronics.com Subject: RV10-List: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine would you buy? Is Barrett Precision Engines high price worth the money? Is it safer, faster, stronger, lighter as advertised? How about the Lycoming X series? Others? If cost were not the main factor, but quality, reliability, safety, and weight were, which would you like, regardless of cost? Jeff Dalton Wings http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-Listhttp://forums.matronics.com


    Message 32


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:44:24 PM PST US
    Subject: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine would
    you buy?
    From: "McGANN, Ron" <ron.mcgann@baesystems.com>
    Why is Vans experimental IO-540 direct from Lycoming not rating a mention here? I just took delivery of an IO-540 and Hartzell prop from Vans for almost the same price as a BPA engine (courtesy of a recent engine price drop and Engine/prop package discount at Vans). I would have liked a Barrett engine given unlimited budget, but I don't know what level of support they can offer customers in the deeeep south. A Lycoming branded engine with no middle man should be readily supportable by engine shops here in Oz and lend themselves to any local performance enhancements they have to offer. cheers, Ron in South Australia - thinkin' about paint ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dave Leikam Sent: Monday, 30 July 2007 2:50 PM To: rv10-list@matronics.com Subject: Re: RV10-List: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine would you buy? One thing I came away with from this years show is that I am going to install an IO-540 of some kind. BPA or AeroSport both look good. I appreciate all the posts on this subject because I was about to ask the same question. I am no longer on the fence about alternatives. The only question now is certified or experimental? Dave Leikam 40496 QB Wings ----- Original Message ----- From: John W. Cox <mailto:johnwcox@pacificnw.com> To: rv10-list@matronics.com Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 10:32 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine would you buy? Until you place in print where each of the Lycoming based vendors document their product. We are waiting on apples, oranges, tangerines and kiwis as a discussion point. It is damned difficult to answer. In defense of clarity, which of the alternatives to Barrett, provide an owner with a documented Dyno run to establish the pig in a poke? To what gram weight is each component balanced. When a builder does not care, then Barrett is indeed more expensive. Another standard is which airshow performers use which RV-10 engine builder? Which rebuilder gives a complete set of documents, CDROMS and blueprints? OSH was a pretty fair playing field to get those questions answered. For price alone, Aerosport has a lot of engines flying in RV-10s. To avoid being coy. I selected Barrett, John Forsling and a Lopresti style cowl a long time ago and little has swayed my decision since. James is no LoPresti cowl. If Money were not object - the subject line question. BPAE. John Cox - 600 ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of jdalton77 Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 9:24 AM To: rv10-list@matronics.com Subject: RV10-List: If money were no object which Lycoming-style engine would you buy? Is Barrett Precision Engines high price worth the money? Is it safer, faster, stronger, lighter as advertised? How about the Lycoming X series? Others? If cost were not the main factor, but quality, reliability, safety, and weight were, which would you like, regardless of cost? Jeff Dalton Wings http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronic s .com/Navigator?RV10-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv10-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV10-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv10-list
  • Browse RV10-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --