RV10-List Digest Archive

Wed 11/21/07


Total Messages Posted: 37



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:34 AM - Elevator pushrod idler arm assembly (MauleDriver)
     2. 06:05 AM - Re: Elevator pushrod idler arm assembly (Jesse Saint)
     3. 06:13 AM - Re: Elevator pushrod idler arm assembly (MauleDriver)
     4. 06:31 AM - Re: Elevator pushrod idler arm assembly (Tim Olson)
     5. 06:47 AM - Re: Elevator pushrod idler arm assembly (MauleDriver)
     6. 07:26 AM - RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours (Tim Olson)
     7. 07:44 AM - Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours (scbt@comcast.net)
     8. 07:52 AM - Re: Firewall penetrations (AirMike)
     9. 08:26 AM - Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours (Tim Olson)
    10. 08:36 AM - Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours (pilotdds@aol.com)
    11. 09:04 AM - Re: Painting and corrosion proofing the steps (Michael Kraus)
    12. 09:13 AM - Re: Firewall penetrations (Scott Schmidt)
    13. 09:23 AM - [Fw: NTSB prelim report on N289DT] (Jae Chang)
    14. 09:39 AM - Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours (neil)
    15. 09:50 AM - Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours (Scott Schmidt)
    16. 09:55 AM - Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours (dougpflyrv@aol.com)
    17. 10:15 AM - Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours (David Jones)
    18. 10:22 AM - Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours (Scott Schmidt)
    19. 10:23 AM - Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours (Perry Casson - Home)
    20. 10:25 AM - NTSB report is out on 289DT (Tim Olson)
    21. 10:40 AM - Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours (Tim Olson)
    22. 10:45 AM - Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours (Tim Olson)
    23. 10:50 AM - thanksgiving (gommone7@bellsouth.net)
    24. 11:15 AM - RV-10 report on line (Pascal)
    25. 11:22 AM - [Fw: NTSB prelim report on N289DT] (Jae Chang)
    26. 11:23 AM - Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours (Doerr, Ray R [NTK])
    27. 12:10 PM - RV-10 Door Incidents (Tim Olson)
    28. 12:22 PM - Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours (Mark Ritter)
    29. 01:34 PM - Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours (Mark Ritter)
    30. 02:39 PM - Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours (dherring10)
    31. 02:50 PM - Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours (Randy DeBauw)
    32. 03:38 PM - Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours (Ted French)
    33. 04:36 PM - Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours (Bill DeRouchey)
    34. 06:02 PM - Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours (Wayne Edgerton)
    35. 06:12 PM - V-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours (GenGrumpy@aol.com)
    36. 09:35 PM - Trutrak AP (David McNeill)
    37. 10:21 PM - Re: Trutrak AP (Tim Olson)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:34:26 AM PST US
    From: MauleDriver <MauleDriver@nc.rr.com>
    Subject: Elevator pushrod idler arm assembly
    It seems that the plans specify a 7/16" thick rod end bearing and a 1/2" thick rod end bearing to both be fastened to the Idler arm clevis. But the clevis is 7/16" wide. I find it odd they the design would call for two rod end bearings of different thicknesses to share a single clevis. Did anyone else run into this or can you otherwise tell me where I'm going wrong? I've gone back and double checked the plans and the manual to find that: The forward pushrod has rod end bearing MD3614M on its aft end, which according to the builders manual is 7/16" thick The rear pushrod has rod end bearing MD3616M on both ends which according to the builders manual is 1/2" thick I think I can force the idler arm clevis to accept both but that just doesn't seem like good design or practice. Bill Watson 40605


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:05:00 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Elevator pushrod idler arm assembly
    From: "Jesse Saint" <jesse@saintaviation.com>
    The smaller of the two gets washers to make up the space. do not archive Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. jesse@saintaviation.com www.saintaviation.com 352-427-0285 MauleDriver wrote: > > It seems that the plans specify a 7/16" thick rod end bearing and a 1/2" > thick rod end bearing to both be fastened to the Idler arm clevis. But > the clevis is 7/16" wide. > > I find it odd they the design would call for two rod end bearings of > different thicknesses to share a single clevis. > > Did anyone else run into this or can you otherwise tell me where I'm > going wrong? > > I've gone back and double checked the plans and the manual to find that: > The forward pushrod has rod end bearing MD3614M on its aft end, which > according to the builders manual is 7/16" thick > The rear pushrod has rod end bearing MD3616M on both ends which > according to the builders manual is 1/2" thick > > I think I can force the idler arm clevis to accept both but that just > doesn't seem like good design or practice. > > Bill Watson > 40605 > >


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:13:52 AM PST US
    From: MauleDriver <MauleDriver@nc.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Elevator pushrod idler arm assembly
    Duh.... Nevermind. The walk back from the hangar in the crisp morning air provided some insight. I went back and once again looked at the plans focusing on the washer configuration. Looking carefully, I see that to 10L washers are used inside the clevis to build up the thinner rod end. With a push and a squeeze, that should work. Bill "more coffee" Watson 40605 MauleDriver wrote: > > It seems that the plans specify a 7/16" thick rod end bearing and a > 1/2" thick rod end bearing to both be fastened to the Idler arm > clevis. But the clevis is 7/16" wide. > > I find it odd they the design would call for two rod end bearings of > different thicknesses to share a single clevis. > > Did anyone else run into this or can you otherwise tell me where I'm > going wrong? > > I've gone back and double checked the plans and the manual to find that: > The forward pushrod has rod end bearing MD3614M on its aft end, which > according to the builders manual is 7/16" thick > The rear pushrod has rod end bearing MD3616M on both ends which > according to the builders manual is 1/2" thick > > I think I can force the idler arm clevis to accept both but that just > doesn't seem like good design or practice. > > Bill Watson > 40605 >


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:31:48 AM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: Elevator pushrod idler arm assembly
    Bill, what page and control arm number are you talking about? I see page 39-3 with a F-1089 that uses a GMM-4M-675 on the forward end, and a MD3614M on the aft. Then on page 39-4 there's a F-1090 that uses 2 of the MD3616M's. And, then on page 39-6 it shows th attachment of the aft end of F-1089 with it's MD3614M connecting to the idler arm with the F-1090's MD3616M, but you can see washers inserted on that forward part of the idler arm for the smaller one. That bracket should be big enough for both of those, not small so you have to stuff the larger one in. Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying MauleDriver wrote: > > It seems that the plans specify a 7/16" thick rod end bearing and a 1/2" > thick rod end bearing to both be fastened to the Idler arm clevis. But > the clevis is 7/16" wide. > > I find it odd they the design would call for two rod end bearings of > different thicknesses to share a single clevis. > > Did anyone else run into this or can you otherwise tell me where I'm > going wrong? > > I've gone back and double checked the plans and the manual to find that: > The forward pushrod has rod end bearing MD3614M on its aft end, which > according to the builders manual is 7/16" thick > The rear pushrod has rod end bearing MD3616M on both ends which > according to the builders manual is 1/2" thick > > I think I can force the idler arm clevis to accept both but that just > doesn't seem like good design or practice. > > Bill Watson > 40605


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:47:01 AM PST US
    From: MauleDriver <MauleDriver@nc.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Elevator pushrod idler arm assembly
    I missed the washers. I just didn't focus in on where they were to be inserted. Too early in the morning and not enough caffeine. However, the idler arm 'clevis' measures 7/16" rather than the 1/2" needed but after a little coaxing it shouldn't be a problem. Thanks. Tim Olson wrote: > > Bill, what page and control arm number are you talking about? > > I see page 39-3 with a F-1089 that uses a GMM-4M-675 on the > forward end, and a MD3614M on the aft. Then on page 39-4 > there's a F-1090 that uses 2 of the MD3616M's. And, then > on page 39-6 it shows th attachment of the aft end of F-1089 > with it's MD3614M connecting to the idler arm with the > F-1090's MD3616M, but you can see washers inserted on that > forward part of the idler arm for the smaller one. That bracket > should be big enough for both of those, not small so you have > to stuff the larger one in. > > Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying > > > MauleDriver wrote: >> >> It seems that the plans specify a 7/16" thick rod end bearing and a >> 1/2" thick rod end bearing to both be fastened to the Idler arm >> clevis. But the clevis is 7/16" wide. >> >> I find it odd they the design would call for two rod end bearings of >> different thicknesses to share a single clevis. >> >> Did anyone else run into this or can you otherwise tell me where I'm >> going wrong? >> >> I've gone back and double checked the plans and the manual to find that: >> The forward pushrod has rod end bearing MD3614M on its aft end, which >> according to the builders manual is 7/16" thick >> The rear pushrod has rod end bearing MD3616M on both ends which >> according to the builders manual is 1/2" thick >> >> I think I can force the idler arm clevis to accept both but that just >> doesn't seem like good design or practice. >> >> Bill Watson >> 40605 > >


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:26:16 AM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours
    I'd like to kind of get a quick informal survey for a couple days and see if we can find out what kind of hours we're gathering as a fleet. If you have a flying RV-10, take this post, add your N-number and total hours to the bottom of the list, (**Round it to the nearest 5) and TRIM OUT ALL THE JUNK THAT GETS ADDED BELOW IT (We'll try to keep it a clean and lean email), and lets see what kind of running total we can come up with in the next couple days. From there, we can expand on it and make some wild assumptions about the fleet based on about 110-115 flying. No major purpose for this, but it seemed like a cool thing to do. If you know of other RV-10's that may not post to the list, and want to post their numbers, go ahead. I'll add what I know was Vic's before he sold it. -- Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying ************************************ **** RV-10 total flying hours **** **** (as of approx. 11/22-23/07 **** ************************************ 310 N104CD 580 N64VC


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:44:33 AM PST US
    From: scbt@comcast.net
    Subject: Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours
    K203JJ - 155 hrs > > > <html><body> <DIV>K203JJ - 155 hrs</DIV> <pre><b><font size=2 color="#000000" face="courier new,courier"> </b></font></pre></body></html>


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:52:13 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Firewall penetrations
    From: "AirMike" <Mikeabel@Pacbell.net>
    Every RV builder should check out EPM-AVCORP.com before they start working on their FIREwall. Regardless of which way you go, you should have the information. This guy has done the research. -------- OSH '08 or Bust Q/B Kit - Doors/windows/fiberglass stuff Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=147698#147698


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:26:07 AM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours
    Tim Olson wrote: > > I'd like to kind of get a quick informal survey for a couple > days and see if we can find out what kind of hours we're > gathering as a fleet. If you have a flying RV-10, take this > post, add your N-number and total hours to the bottom of the list, > (**Round it to the nearest 5) and TRIM OUT ALL THE JUNK > THAT GETS ADDED BELOW IT (We'll try to keep it a clean > and lean email), and lets see what kind of running total > we can come up with in the next couple days. From there, > we can expand on it and make some wild assumptions about the fleet > based on about 110-115 flying. No major purpose for this, but it > seemed like a cool thing to do. If you know of other RV-10's that > may not post to the list, and want to post their numbers, go ahead. > I'll add what I know was Vic's before he sold it. > ************************************ **** RV-10 total flying hours **** **** (as of approx. 11/22-23/07 **** ************************************ Hours N-Number ----- -------- 310 N104CD 580 N64VC 155 K203JJ


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:36:57 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours
    From: pilotdds@aol.com
    728DD--175 -----Original Message----- From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com> Sent: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 7:25 am Subject: RV10-List: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours ? I'd like to kind of get a quick informal survey for a couple? days and see if we can find out what kind of hours we're? gathering as a fleet. If you have a flying RV-10, take this? post, add your N-number and total hours to the bottom of the list,? (**Round it to the nearest 5) and TRIM OUT ALL THE JUNK? THAT GETS ADDED BELOW IT (We'll try to keep it a clean? and lean email), and lets see what kind of running total? we can come up with in the next couple days. From there,? we can expand on it and make some wild assumptions about the fleet? based on about 110-115 flying. No major purpose for this, but it? seemed like a cool thing to do. If you know of other RV-10's that? may not post to the list, and want to post their numbers, go ahead.? I'll add what I know was Vic's before he sold it.? ? -- Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying? ? ************************************? **** RV-10 total flying hours ****? **** (as of approx. 11/22-23/07 ****? ************************************? ? 310 N104CD? 580 N64VC? ? ? ? ________________________________________________________________________ Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! - http://mail.aol.com


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:04:59 AM PST US
    From: Michael Kraus <n223rv@wolflakeairport.net>
    Subject: Painting and corrosion proofing the steps
    I installed the bolts upside down for this very reason, and drilled a 1/2'' hole in the bottom of the fuse and filled it with a hole plug. In the baggage floor I installed two of the same access panels used on the wings for the stall mechanism. I ended up chrome plating my steps, the sure do look purdy and hopefully will be durable. If not, at least it won't be too hard to swap them out. -Mike -----Original Message----- From: "John Gonzalez" <indigoonlatigo@msn.com> Sent: 11/20/07 1:33 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Painting and corrosion proofing the steps Scott, Have you tried to put the bold in the receiver when the side wall panels are on. I can't remember, but I think the bolt was too long to fit without either making an additional hole in the floor(Behind those side panels) or also having the side panels removable with screws and nutplates. John G. 409 What I did for the step was to simply cut access holes in my baggage compartment so I could take the steps on and off. I just manufactured a simple cover with nutplates. Then you don't have to worry about the step right now


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:13:18 AM PST US
    From: Scott Schmidt <scottmschmidt@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Firewall penetrations
    http://www.epm-avcorp.com/tubeseal.html I really liked these for all my wires. Just order the biggest one if you go this route. The smaller ones are much more difficult to work with. I used the eyeball style for my throttle, prop and mixture and for my three cables that power the electronic ignition. http://www.scottandranae.smugmug.com/gallery/518426/1/53556340/Medium Scott Schmidt ----- Original Message ---- From: "McGANN, Ron" <ron.mcgann@baesystems.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 2:37:04 PM Subject: RV10-List: Firewall penetrations Firewall penetrations G'day all, I am about to work the firewall for wire and cable pass throughs. What penetration techniques have people found the best - eyeballs, s/s grommet covers, tube/firesleeve etc? Are there any specific locations to avoid when making the penetrations? Is there a 'best spot'? What is the best way to cut 'largish' holes (ie >1/2") into the stainless?? Thanks in advance for your suggestions. Ron 187 finishing "Warning: The information contained in this email and any attached files is confidential to BAE Systems Australia. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this email or any attachments is expressly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately. VIRUS: Every care has been taken to ensure this email and its attachments are virus free, however, any loss or damage incurred in using this email is not the sender's responsibility. It is your responsibility to ensure virus checks are completed before installing any data sent in this email to your computer."


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:23:21 AM PST US
    From: Jae Chang <jc-matronics_rv10@jline.com>
    Subject: [Fwd: NTSB prelim report on N289DT]
    Looks like the NTSB prelim report is released... -------- Original Message -------- Subject: NTSB prelim report on N289DT From: Gerry Filby <gerf@gerf.com> Has anyone posted this link to the RV-10 matronics list ? http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id 071120X01821&key=1 g


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:39:44 AM PST US
    From: neil <ncol@xtra.co.nz>
    Subject: Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours
    20 ZK-RVT


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:50:14 AM PST US
    From: Scott Schmidt <scottmschmidt@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours
    Is there anyone at the factory right now monitoring this thread? Do you know what their two planes have on them? Scott Schmidt Do not archive ----- Original Message ---- From: "pilotdds@aol.com" <pilotdds@aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 9:28:18 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours 728DD--175 -----Original Message----- From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com> Sent: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 7:25 am Subject: RV10-List: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours I'd like to kind of get a quick informal survey for a couple days and see if we can find out what kind of hours we're gathering as a fleet. If you have a flying RV-10, take this post, add your N-number and total hours to the bottom of the list, (**Round it to the nearest 5) and TRIM OUT ALL THE JUNK THAT GETS ADDED BELOW IT (We'll try to keep it a clean and lean email), and lets see what kind of running total we can come up with in the next couple days. From there, we can expand on it and make some wild assumptions about the fleet based on about 110-115 flying. No major purpose for this, but it seemed like a cool thing to do. If you know of other RV-10's that may not post to the list, and want to post their numbers, go ahead. I'll add what I know was Vic's before he sold it. -- Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying ************************************ **** RV-10 total flying hours **** **** (as of approx. 11/22-23/07 **** ************************************ 310 N104CD 580 N64VC Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail!


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:55:02 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours
    From: dougpflyrv@aol.com
    YA'LL HAVE A HAPPY THANKSGIVING DP -----Original Message----- From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com> Sent: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 9:25 am Subject: RV10-List: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours ? I'd like to kind of get a quick informal survey for a couple? days and see if we can find out what kind of hours we're? gathering as a fleet. If you have a flying RV-10, take this? post, add your N-number and total hours to the bottom of the list,? (**Round it to the nearest 5) and TRIM OUT ALL THE JUNK? THAT GETS ADDED BELOW IT (We'll try to keep it a clean? and lean email), and lets see what kind of running total? we can come up with in the next couple days. From there,? we can expand on it and make some wild assumptions about the fleet? based on about 110-115 flying. No major purpose for this, but it? seemed like a cool thing to do. If you know of other RV-10's that? may not post to the list, and want to post their numbers, go ahead.? I'll add what I know was Vic's before he sold it.? ? -- Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying? ? ************************************? **** RV-10 total flying hours ****? **** (as of approx. 11/22-23/07 ****? ************************************? ? 310 N104CD? 580 N64VC 85?? N372RV ________________________________________________________________________


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:15:11 AM PST US
    From: David Jones <d.j.goneflyin@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours
    -----Original Message----- >From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com> >Sent: Nov 21, 2007 11:09 AM >To: rv10-list@matronics.com >Subject: Re: RV10-List: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours > > > >Tim Olson wrote: >> >> I'd like to kind of get a quick informal survey for a couple >> days and see if we can find out what kind of hours we're >> gathering as a fleet. If you have a flying RV-10, take this >> post, add your N-number and total hours to the bottom of the list, >> (**Round it to the nearest 5) and TRIM OUT ALL THE JUNK >> THAT GETS ADDED BELOW IT (We'll try to keep it a clean >> and lean email), and lets see what kind of running total >> we can come up with in the next couple days. From there, >> we can expand on it and make some wild assumptions about the fleet >> based on about 110-115 flying. No major purpose for this, but it >> seemed like a cool thing to do. If you know of other RV-10's that >> may not post to the list, and want to post their numbers, go ahead. >> I'll add what I know was Vic's before he sold it. >> > >************************************ >**** RV-10 total flying hours **** >**** (as of approx. 11/22-23/07 **** >************************************ >Hours N-Number >----- -------- >310 N104CD >580 N64VC >155 K203JJ 086 N331DJ > >


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:22:14 AM PST US
    From: Scott Schmidt <scottmschmidt@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours
    Tim Olson wrote: > > I'd like to kind of get a quick informal survey for a couple > days and see if we can find out what kind of hours we're > gathering as a fleet. If you have a flying RV-10, take this > post, add your N-number and total hours to the bottom of the list, > (**Round it to the nearest 5) and TRIM OUT ALL THE JUNK > THAT GETS ADDED BELOW IT (We'll try to keep it a clean > and lean email), and lets see what kind of running total > we can come up with in the next couple days. From there, > we can expand on it and make some wild assumptions about the fleet > based on about 110-115 flying. No major purpose for this, but it > seemed like a cool thing to do. If you know of other RV-10's that > may not post to the list, and want to post their numbers, go ahead. > I'll add what I know was Vic's before he sold it. > ************************************ **** RV-10 total flying hours **** **** (as of approx. 11/22-23/07 **** ************************************ Hours N-Number ----- -------- 310 N104CD 580 N64VC 155 K203JJ 290 N104XP


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:23:53 AM PST US
    From: Perry Casson - Home <pcasson@sasktel.net>
    Subject: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours
    ************************************ **** RV-10 total flying hours **** **** (as of approx. 11/22-23/07 **** ************************************ 310 N104CD 580 N64VC 155 K203JJ 20 C-FMHP


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:25:18 AM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: NTSB report is out on 289DT
    The following just came out of the NTSB. NTSB Identification: NYC08LA023 14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation Accident occurred Friday, November 02, 2007 in Greenville, PA Aircraft: Vans Aircraft RV-10, registration: N289DT Injuries: 1 Fatal. This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors. Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been completed. On November 2, 2007, at 0830 eastern daylight time, an amateur built Vans RV-10, N289DT, was substantially damaged when it impacted terrain near Greenville, Pennsylvania. The certificated private pilot was fatally injured. Day visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the local flight that departed Greenville Municipal Airport (4G1), Greenville, Pennsylvania. No flight plan was filed for the personal flight conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. According to a family member, the pilot had driven to the airport to practice "touch and go's" and to make sure everything was functioning properly, prior to a planned afternoon trip in the airplane with his family to Boston, Massachusetts. Witness interviews were conducted by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the Safety Board, and while no one saw the airplane depart 4G1, the airplane was observed by a witness at approximately 0800 traveling in a northwesterly direction at low altitude, moving "fast," and sounding like it was "running strong like a Ford Mustang (turbocharged) Cobra that the witness once owned." At approximately 0825, the airplane was again observed but, this time by multiple witnesses. Descriptions varied between witness statements as to the altitude, direction of flight, and velocity of the airplane; however, the preponderance of witness statements were that the airplane was flying north on the east side of Pennsylvania State Route 58, and seemed to make a circle to the left at approximately 500 feet above ground level (agl). It was next observed to travel in a westerly direction, fly across Route 58 and make another turn to the left with the engine "revving up and down," and losing altitude. When it reached approximately 50-feet agl and was heading east, the airplane rolled wings level and impacted a cornfield in a 35 to 60 degree nose down attitude. A fireball erupted, and the airplane slid approximately 100-feet. It then impacted the shoulder of Route 58, nosed over, and came to rest inverted on the roadway. The amateur built airplane, was a four place, low wing monoplane. It was equipped with a non-certificated Eggenfellner E6T/220, which was a water cooled, fuel injected, turbo-charged, six cylinder engine. The airplane's special airworthiness certificate was issued on July 10, 2007. The pilot held a private pilot certificate, with a rating for airplane single engine land. His most recent FAA third class medical certificate was issued on March 14, 2006. According to his pilot logbook, he had accrued 221.4 total hours of flight experience. A weather observation taken about 23 minutes after the accident at Port Meadville Airport (GKJ), Meadville, Pennsylvania, located about 14 nautical miles northeast of the accident site, recorded the winds as 090 degrees at 4 knots, visibility 10 miles, sky clear, temperature 1 degree Celsius, dew point -2 degrees Celsius, and an altimeter setting of 30.36 inches of mercury. The wreckage was retained by the Safety Board for further examination.


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:40:02 AM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours
    To all: I guess, don't worry about cleaning up the message as you go and adding yours to the bottom. Since 2 or more people can reply at the same time, that could mean someones gets left out. I'll just watch all of them come in and make a list and then repost the list so far a couple times for the next couple days. That way you can just delete all of the emails in the thread coming in and you'll be left with a cleaned up one now and then. I guess my foresight was a little lacking here. ;) Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying do not archive Scott Schmidt wrote: > > > > Tim Olson wrote: > <mailto:Tim@MyRV10.com>> > > > > I'd like to kind of get a quick informal survey for a couple > > days and see if we can find out what kind of hours we're > > gathering as a fleet. If you have a flying RV-10, take this > > post, add your N-number and total hours to the bottom of the list, > > (**Round it to the nearest 5) and TRIM OUT ALL THE JUNK > > THAT GETS ADDED BELOW IT (We'll try to keep it a clean > > and lean email), and lets see what kind of running total > > we can come up with in the next couple days. From there, > > we can expand on it and make some wild assumptions about the fleet > > based on about 110-115 flying. No major purpose for this, but it > > seemed like a cool thing to do. If you know of other RV-10's that > > may not post to the list, and want to post their numbers, go ahead. > > I'll add what I know was Vic's before he sold it. > > > > ************************************ > **** RV-10 total flying hours **** > **** (as of approx. 11/22-23/07 **** > ************************************ > Hours N-Number > ----- -------- > 310 N104CD > 580 N64VC > 155 K203JJ > 290 N104XP > > * > > > *


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:45:05 AM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours
    Just re-cleaning the thread.... Tim Olson wrote: > > I'd like to kind of get a quick informal survey for a couple > days and see if we can find out what kind of hours we're > gathering as a fleet. If you have a flying RV-10, take this > post, add your N-number and total hours to the bottom of the list, > (**Round it to the nearest 5) and TRIM OUT ALL THE JUNK > THAT GETS ADDED BELOW IT (We'll try to keep it a clean > and lean email), and lets see what kind of running total > we can come up with in the next couple days. From there, > we can expand on it and make some wild assumptions about the fleet > based on about 110-115 flying. No major purpose for this, but it > seemed like a cool thing to do. If you know of other RV-10's that > may not post to the list, and want to post their numbers, go ahead. > I'll add what I know was Vic's before he sold it. > ************************************ **** RV-10 total flying hours **** **** (as of approx. 11/22-23/07 **** ************************************ Hours N-Number ----- -------- 310 N104CD 580 N64VC 155 K203JJ 85 N372RV 175 N728DD 20 ZK-RVT


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:50:25 AM PST US
    From: gommone7@bellsouth.net
    Subject: thanksgiving
    Happy thanksgiving to everybody ,and safe fly. Hugo 40456


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:15:41 AM PST US
    From: "Pascal" <rv10builder@verizon.net>
    Subject: RV-10 report on line
    NTSB Preliminary Report is online. http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id 071120X01821&key=1 ..."the preponderance of witness statements were that the airplane was flying north on the east side of Pennsylvania State Route 58, and seemed to make a circle to the left at approximately 500 feet above ground level (agl). It was next observed to travel in a westerly direction, fly across Route 58 and make another turn to the left with the engine "revving up and down," and losing altitude. When it reached approximately 50-feet agl and was heading east, the airplane rolled wings level and impacted a cornfield in a 35 to 60 degree nose down attitude. A fireball erupted, and the airplane slid approximately 100- feet. It then impacted the shoulder of Route 58, nosed over, and came to rest inverted on the roadway."...


    Message 25


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:22:07 AM PST US
    From: Jae Chang <jc-matronics_rv10@jline.com>
    Subject: [Fwd: NTSB prelim report on N289DT]
    oops. i meant to only forward the link. i didn't mean to post anyone's email addresses out to the world, including my own. sorry Gerry! Jae


    Message 26


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:23:03 AM PST US
    Subject: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours
    From: "Doerr, Ray R [NTK]" <Ray.R.Doerr@sprint.com>
    ************************************ **** RV-10 total flying hours **** **** (as of approx. 11/22-23/07 **** ************************************ 340 N519RV


    Message 27


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:10:56 PM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: RV-10 Door Incidents
    Sorry to not post just all good cheer before a holiday, but a safety message well received should be cheery, right? A former RV-10 owner saw the write up I did from early this week and that prompted him to call me today. He's a professional pilot, with many many thousand hours of experience, and is a CFI (and more). He said he hadn't posted anything previously because it is indeed embarrassing to tell a story of poor preparation...things like missing something on a checklist and then having an incident. But reading the write up he felt compelled to share his story. He's not involved in our online community any more, but asked me if I'd mind telling it for him. (And no, to make sure this isn't mis-attributed, it was not the famous red/white plane of Vic's) The basic story is simple. A passenger was along, and as they taxied along, they were less "sterile cockpit" than what you may prefer. This caused them to overlook the checklist item of verifying the doors closed and latched. They got their VFR takeoff clearance, and as they rotated, the door came up. His headset was twisted sideways, as your body's edge is a little in the air stream when this happen, so he quickly moved to put his headset back on, and as he looked up at the door, it departed the aircraft. With 8000' of runway, there was room to do a gentle landing, and taxi back to grab the door. The issue is, he said it was an extremely rattling event...much like an "explosion" to use his words, when that door opened. He believed that it was startling enough that some day, a door opening event would cause a bad accident....not because the plane flew poorly (he said it flew just great without the door), but because the pilot will be too startled and may react inappropriately. Now, although not much has been written on forums about RV-10's and doors, it's pretty well known to some that there have indeed been a handful of RV-10 door incidents where the door was either torn off or nearly torn off, due to improper latching. I'm not sure how many...probably under 10, but over 5. This is just a guess, but I'd have to say that I believe this is about the only mechanical type issue we've seen that has caused damage to a plane. So, it's something to absolutely take seriously with your checklist. Does the RV-10 need a door redesign? Well, it would be a lie to say you couldn't design a better door system, but, it is what it is. In reality, although the doors have this potential, if the pilot is diligent you'll very likely never see an incident, and this pilot knows that. He knew he screwed up. Van's also knew their design wasn't perhaps as ideal as a Cirrus, for instance, but it is a simple design that a homebuilder can handle easily. Van's has known this for a long time, and they came out with their door latch warning system just to combat this problem with inattentive pilots. It monitors the door pins and there are lights and a buzzer to let you know if the pins aren't secured properly. Given that addition, there's no reason you should have to have as much worry. This pilot did not have that system installed because he felt he may become too reliant on the sensing hardware, rather than a good checklist procedure....and hardware fails too. Well, as is easy to guess...pilots probably fail more often than hardware does, and that's what happened here. It's something that could happen to any of us. I write this all here as a reminder from him to pay attention to this item very closely in your piloting. It is the one known issue that you really have to watch for. But once those doors are latched and the roll pin is seated tightly in the latch mechanism, it is also true that there is no reason you should have a door come off, so you should not be overly alarmed at the mere potential. Please, as you flying RV-10 owners take to the skies both this Holiday season and beyond, check the doors, and instill it in your families to all participate in the door pin check. Install the latch warning system and use it. Admittedly, since the system came out after I was flying I have not yet installed my kit, but this is quickly helping me to move it higher on the to-do list, and I need to be extra cautious. Also, thanks to our former RV-10 pal who was willing to share his story and a learning experience with you all. Happy Thanksgiving! -- Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying


    Message 28


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:22:56 PM PST US
    From: Mark Ritter <mritter509@msn.com>
    Subject: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours
    <html><div></div> > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:25:06 -0600> From: Tim@MyRV10.com> To: rv10-lis t@matronics.com> Subject: RV10-List: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours to kind of get a quick informal survey for a couple> days and see if we ca n find out what kind of hours we're> gathering as a fleet. If you have a fl ying RV-10, take this> post, add your N-number and total hours to the botto m of the list,> (**Round it to the nearest 5) and TRIM OUT ALL THE JUNK> TH AT GETS ADDED BELOW IT (We'll try to keep it a clean> and lean email), and lets see what kind of running total> we can come up with in the next couple days. From there,> we can expand on it and make some wild assumptions abou t the fleet> based on about 110-115 flying. No major purpose for this, but it> seemed like a cool thing to do. If you know of other RV-10's that> may not post to the list, and want to post their numbers, go ahead.> I'll add w hat I know was Vic's before he sold it.> > -- > Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying> > > ************************************> **** RV-10 total flying h ours ****> **** (as of approx. 11/22-23/07 ****> ************************** ===============> > > _________________________________________________________________ You keep typing, we keep giving. Download Messenger and join the i=92m Init iative now.


    Message 29


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:34:11 PM PST US
    From: Mark Ritter <mritter509@msn.com>
    Subject: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours
    160 N410MR<html><div></div> > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:36:47 -0600> From: Tim@MyRV10.com> To: rv10-lis t@matronics.com> Subject: Re: RV10-List: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit y ll:> > I guess, don't worry about cleaning up the message as> you go and ad ding yours to the bottom. Since 2 or more> people can reply at the same tim e, that could mean someones> gets left out. I'll just watch all of them com e in> and make a list and then repost the list so far> a couple times for t he next couple days. That way you> can just delete all of the emails in the thread coming> in and you'll be left with a cleaned up one now and then.> I guess my foresight was a little lacking here. ;)> > Tim Olson - RV-10 N10 4CD - Flying> do not archive> > > Scott Schmidt wrote:> > > > > > > > Tim O > > <mailto:Tim@MyRV10.com>>> > >> > > I'd like to kind of get a quick inf ormal survey for a couple> > > days and see if we can find out what kind of hours we're> > > gathering as a fleet. If you have a flying RV-10, take th is> > > post, add your N-number and total hours to the bottom of the list,> > > (**Round it to the nearest 5) and TRIM OUT ALL THE JUNK> > > THAT GETS ADDED BELOW IT (We'll try to keep it a clean> > > and lean email), and let s see what kind of running total> > > we can come up with in the next coupl e days. From there,> > > we can expand on it and make some wild assumptions about the fleet> > > based on about 110-115 flying. No major purpose for t his, but it> > > seemed like a cool thing to do. If you know of other RV-10 's that> > > may not post to the list, and want to post their numbers, go a head.> > > I'll add what I know was Vic's before he sold it.> > >> > > > ** **********************************> > **** RV-10 total flying hours ****> > **** (as of approx. 11/22-23/07 ****> > ********************************** **> > Hours N-Number> > ----- --------> > 310 N104CD> > 580 N64VC> > 155 K2 ==============> > > _________________________________________________________________ Connect and share in new ways with Windows Live. http://www.windowslive.com/connect.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_Wave2_newways_1120 07


    Message 30


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:39:07 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours
    From: "dherring10" <dherring10@suddenlink.net>
    I think all of you guys are just bragging, trying to make us non-flyers feel bad! [Laughing] Dwayne Herring 40506 fighting with canopy & doors Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=147778#147778


    Message 31


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:50:47 PM PST US
    Subject: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours
    From: "Randy DeBauw" <Randy@abros.com>
    -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tim Olson Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 7:25 AM Subject: RV10-List: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours I'd like to kind of get a quick informal survey for a couple days and see if we can find out what kind of hours we're gathering as a fleet. If you have a flying RV-10, take this post, add your N-number and total hours to the bottom of the list, (**Round it to the nearest 5) and TRIM OUT ALL THE JUNK THAT GETS ADDED BELOW IT (We'll try to keep it a clean and lean email), and lets see what kind of running total we can come up with in the next couple days. From there, we can expand on it and make some wild assumptions about the fleet based on about 110-115 flying. No major purpose for this, but it seemed like a cool thing to do. If you know of other RV-10's that may not post to the list, and want to post their numbers, go ahead. I'll add what I know was Vic's before he sold it. -- Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying ************************************ **** RV-10 total flying hours **** **** (as of approx. 11/22-23/07 **** ************************************ 310 N104CD 580 N64VC 225 N610RV


    Message 32


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:38:51 PM PST US
    From: "Ted French" <ted_french@telus.net>
    Subject: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours
    C-FXCS - 70 hrs Do Not Archive Ted French C-FXCS RV-10 Flying


    Message 33


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:36:18 PM PST US
    From: Bill DeRouchey <billderou@yahoo.com>
    Subject: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours
    N939SB 155hrs N504LB 150hrs Ted French <ted_french@telus.net> wrote: C-FXCS - 70 hrs Do Not Archive Ted French C-FXCS RV-10 Flying


    Message 34


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:02:12 PM PST US
    From: "Wayne Edgerton" <wayne.e@grandecom.net>
    Subject: Re: RV-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours
    N602WT 85hrs Wayne Edgerton do not archive


    Message 35


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:12:22 PM PST US
    From: GenGrumpy@aol.com
    Subject: V-10 Total Flight Time - Submit yours
    In a message dated 11/21/2007 10:28:24 A.M. Central Standard Time, Tim@MyRV10.com writes: --> RV10-List message posted by: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com> Tim Olson wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com> > > I'd like to kind of get a quick informal survey for a couple > days and see if we can find out what kind of hours we're > gathering as a fleet. If you have a flying RV-10, take this > post, add your N-number and total hours to the bottom of the list, > (**Round it to the nearest 5) and TRIM OUT ALL THE JUNK > THAT GETS ADDED BELOW IT (We'll try to keep it a clean > and lean email), and lets see what kind of running total > we can come up with in the next couple days. From there, > we can expand on it and make some wild assumptions about the fleet > based on about 110-115 flying. No major purpose for this, but it > seemed like a cool thing to do. If you know of other RV-10's that > may not post to the list, and want to post their numbers, go ahead. > I'll add what I know was Vic's before he sold it. > ************************************ **** RV-10 total flying hours **** **** (as of approx. 11/22-23/07 **** ************************************ Hours N-Number ----- -------- 310 N104CD 580 N64VC 155 K203JJ 65 N184JM **************************************Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest products. (http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001)


    Message 36


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:35:37 PM PST US
    From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007@cox.net>
    Subject: Trutrak AP
    I have have the Digiflite II V2.20. The aircraft is not flying; roll servo harness is in dsub for wing connection. pitch servo harness is connected to the elevator control horn. When testing the controller, I find that the units turns on and properly indicates when receiving the GPS signal. The Problem is that the ALT Hold function can not be disengaged without going into setup mode and and turning off the pitch servo altogether. Is something wrong with the harness? the unit? or are these strange results in response to a system only partially connected? TT has updated the software once already and the aircraft has not left the garage.


    Message 37


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:21:12 PM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: Trutrak AP
    David, I've got good news, and bad news. The bad news is that yes, that's the way it works. If you want no ALT hold, then you have to hold the ALT button down until you're in the config menu and just set it to not be on. I'm not sure why they didn't make it able to be a wing leveler only, but other than that method, there isn't a way that I've found. There's more bad news... Version 2.20 is not going to be what you'll want to fly with considering you have a good vertically integrated system. 2.20 contains the rounding bug that will cause pitch oscillations. So, perhaps before you get too far along and into that pre-first-flight crunch, you may want to get it up to at least 2.24, which does work well. Now, for the good news... I haven't found that there's really been much for times that I care about the seemingly goofy step of turning the ALT hold off. Once you hook that AP to the EFIS for doing your flights, you'll be able to set altitude preselects on your Chelton, it will climb to altitude, do your descents, both lateral and vertical controlling, heading mode, and pretty much anything you would want. The only time it would be at all handy to have the ALT hold off is if you for some reason really want to hand fly the altitude only, but let the EFIS or AP take care of the lateral steering....which would kind of be strange since you HAVE the functionality to make life easy. Plus, for those few times when you really just want to get the climb going right away, the EFIS makes hand flying so easy that you can just disengage the AP and it's still easy. I know, you probably think the whole situation sucks right now....but just wait until you fly it...it works very well. Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying do not archive David McNeill wrote: > I have have the Digiflite II V2.20. The aircraft is not flying; roll > servo harness is in dsub for wing connection. pitch servo harness is > connected to the elevator control horn. When testing the controller, I > find that the units turns on and properly indicates when receiving the > GPS signal. The Problem is that the *ALT Hold* function can not be > disengaged without going into setup mode and and turning off the pitch > servo altogether. Is something wrong with the harness? the unit? or are > these strange results in response to a system only partially > connected? TT has updated the software once already and the aircraft has > not left the garage. > > * >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv10-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV10-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv10-list
  • Browse RV10-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --