Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 02:42 AM - Re: Trim Controller (tomhanaway)
     2. 03:43 AM - Re: Re: Trim Controller (Bob-tcw)
     3. 05:14 AM - Re: Re: Koolmat Installation (dougpflyrv@aol.com)
     4. 05:24 AM - Re: Re: Koolmat Installation (David Maib)
     5. 05:33 AM - Hartzell 14" Spinner Dimensions (jason.kreidler@regalbeloit.com)
     6. 05:37 AM - Re: Re: Trim Controller (gary)
     7. 05:59 AM - Trim Controller (Fred Williams, M.D.)
     8. 06:07 AM - Re: Re: Koolmat Installation (Rick Sked)
     9. 06:29 AM - Re: Re: Koolmat Installation (GRANSCOTT@aol.com)
    10. 06:40 AM - Re: Hartzell 14" Spinner Dimensions (Fred Williams, M.D.)
    11. 06:44 AM - Re: AA Overhead console retrofitting (Lew Gallagher)
    12. 06:46 AM - Re: Re: Koolmat Installation (Kelly McMullen)
    13. 07:02 AM - Re: V Speeds (steveadams)
    14. 07:03 AM - Re: Gear Leg Fairing (Lew Gallagher)
    15. 07:03 AM - Re: Re: Koolmat Installation (nicholscatoauto@aol.com)
    16. 07:23 AM - Re: Re: AA Overhead console retrofitting (Phillips, Jack)
    17. 07:56 AM - Re: Hartzell 14" Spinner Dimensions (Carl Froehlich)
    18. 10:17 AM - Re: Wisconsin Visit (Jeff Carpenter)
    19. 11:36 AM - Oil Cooler Aero Duct (Robin Marks)
    20. 11:50 AM - Re: Trim Controller (John Hurst)
    21. 06:41 PM - Re: Re: Koolmat Installation (kilopapa@antelecom.net)
    22. 06:52 PM - Re: Re: Koolmat Installation (Rick Sked)
    23. 07:56 PM - Re: Re: Koolmat Installation (Les Kearney)
    24. 08:34 PM - Re: Re: Koolmat Installation (David McNeill)
    25. 11:13 PM - New service letter on RV10 (Vernon Smith)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Trim Controller | 
      
      
      John,
      I hadn't heard anything so I called SteinAir last night.  They were going through
      the list trying to figure out some of the people that ordered based on username.
      So they found my name, my bank account is poorer by the amount of servo and harness,
      and it's on its way.
      
      So you might just give them a call today.
      
      Tom H.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=164161#164161
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: RE: Trim Controller | 
      
      John,    Please give Stein a call,  he is shipping out product for the 
      Group Buy promotion.   I know first hand!   He has Safety-Trim 
      controllers, harnesses and airspeed switches in stock and is sending 
      them out every day.  
      
      do not archive
      
      Best regards,
      Bob Newman
      TCW Technologies
      www.tcwtech.com
      
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: John Hurst 
        To: rv10-list@matronics.com 
        Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 9:56 PM
        Subject: RV10-List: RE: Trim Controller
      
      
        This wasn't from the "Group buy" was it? 
        I haven't received any info from Stein since Jan 23rd and am hoping 
      that I haven't deleted something important by mistake.
      
        john
        gary <speckter@comcast.net> wrote:
          I just got my trim controller from Stein and have a question that 
      might be helpful to all.
           
          I got the air switch.  It has a Pitot input and a Static input.  Is 
      there any overwhelming reason to plumb the static port into the aircraft 
      system?  Why not leave it open to the cabin pressure?  Other than being 
      off a few MPH from time to time would it make any big difference?
           
          Gary
          40274
           
      
      -------------------------------------------------------------------------
      ---
      
          From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com 
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dave Saylor
          Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 12:20 AM
          To: rv10-list@matronics.com
          Subject: RV10-List: Shameless For-Profit Promotion of New RV-10 
      Products
           
          We've posted a few new products on our web site specifically for 
      RV-10s:  http://www.aircraftersllc.com/products.htm
           
          Please call or email with any questions!
           
          Dave Saylor
          AirCrafters LLC
          140 Aviation Way
          Watsonville, CA 
          831-722-9141
          831-750-0284 CL
          www.AirCraftersLLC.com
           
           
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Koolmat Installation | 
      
      
       RON, DO U FEEL IT HELPED REDUCE TUNNEL HEAT?
      DOUG PRESTON
      N372RV
      
      DO NOT ARCHIVE
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: McGANN, Ron <ron.mcgann@baesystems.com>
      Sent: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 9:54 pm
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Koolmat Installation
      
      
      
      Looks like Koolmat installation might become the next 'primer war'
      <gag>.
      
      I installed Koolmat on the engine side of the firewall about 12 months
      ago when 'tunnel heat' was the hot topic (bad pun - sorry).  It was my
      attempt to reduce any radiant heat affects that drove tunnel temps and I
      used red RTV for attachment.  I also installed a layer of Koolmat on the
      tunnel floor, attached with velcro in answer to Lew's question below.  I
      have also heard of builders here in Oz using snap fasteners and even s/s
      screws to pin the mat in position, but I doubt that velcro would be up
      to the mission in the engine compartment.  Just another 0.02 worth.
      
      Cheers,
      Ron
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Lew Gallagher
      Sent: Friday, 15 February 2008 2:07 PM
      Subject: RV10-List: Re: Koolmat Installation
      
      
      Hey Guys,
      
      We're not this far yet, but very interested in the discussion.  If
      removable insulation is desirable, is there a velcro product that could
      be used here?
      
      Later, - Lew
      
      --------
      non-pilot
      crazy about building
      NOW OFICIALLY BUILDER #40549
      Landing gear installed, we're mobile!
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=164117#164117
      
      
      "Warning:
      The information contained in this email and any attached files is
      confidential to BAE Systems Australia. If you are not the intended
      recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this email or any
      attachments is expressly prohibited.  If you have received this email
      in error, please notify us immediately. VIRUS: Every care has been
      taken to ensure this email and its attachments are virus free,
      however, any loss or damage incurred in using this email is not the
      sender's responsibility.  It is your responsibility to ensure virus
      checks are completed before installing any data sent in this email to
      your computer."
      
      
      ________________________________________________________________________
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Koolmat Installation | 
      
      
      Well, I did not intend to start a "Koolmat War" when I asked the  
      original question! However, as always, the list is priceless for all  
      of the points of view and sources of information. Thanks to all for  
      the responses. There was never any question from me about what side  
      it goes on. It is made for the firewall side. I just wanted some  
      ideas about how to secure it, and now I have that!
      Thanks to all.
      
      David Maib
      40559
      Engine should be hung next week!
      
      do not archive
      
      
      On Feb 14, 2008, at 9:14 PM, Rick Sked wrote:
      
      
      OK...
      
      Koolmat is intended as a FIRE BARRIER. It is intended to be installed  
      on the engine side firewall. Ask all the NASCAR drivers who  
      experienced catastropic engine fires last year how it worked, it's  
      standard equipment. If you have a problem with inspecting your  
      firewall, don't use it. I have it on mine, it is held by a perimeter  
      bead of red RTV. I can peel it off without much trouble, I have done  
      it once already. If you want to bat around the inspection of the  
      firewall issue then fine, I can pull my stainless steel  heat valves  
      off, loosen my eyeball cable guides, remove my firewall mounted  
      electrial connectors and see my firewall in about an hours worth of  
      work. BUT....if I prang a landing, the last thing I'm worrying about  
      is the firewall. The firewall is really not a structural piece. The  
      weldments and adjoining structural members are the parts that will  
      absorb the impact and show signs of STRUCTURAL failure. Yes the  
      firewall will wrinkle, but get on your back, scoot your a!
        ss under the panel and see what is really bent. Most of us elected  
      to use the koolmat to prevent heat buldup in the tunnel. It is a  
      fiberglass mat with a pure silicone finish. It is NOT a  
      insulator...it is intended to keep FLAMES from breaching the  
      firewall. So screw your indifference. Rob has spelled it out..read  
      the spec sheet on the stuff and decide if you want it or not...Look  
      at a tube and frame aircraft, the firewall only is intended to keep  
      flames away from the cockpit...not provide structural integrity. I'm  
      off the soap box...
      
      Risk Sked
      40185
      Koolmat user
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "Kelly McMullen" <apilot2@gmail.com>
      Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 4:54:29 PM (GMT-0800) America/ 
      Los_Angeles
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Koolmat Installation
      
      
      I'm glad there is a difference in your mind. That is the only place
      you will find any difference in R value or acoustic value.
      If it is on the front side, you will NOT be able to properly inspect
      the firewall.
      
      On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Bob-tcw <rnewman@tcwtech.com> wrote:
      >
      >
      > I'm going to use Koolmat on my RV-10,   I'm planning on putting it  
      > on the
      > firewall side for the following reasons.
      >
      > 1) The Silicon side of koolmat is quite impervious to oil and fluids.
      > 2) Heat transfer is a function of three modes: Convection,  
      > Conduction and
      > Radiation.  Limiting heat transfer into the passanger compartment  
      > should
      > best be accomplished by reducing each of these factors.     
      > Insulation on
      > either side of the firewall will be effective at reducing conduction,
      > (convection should not be an issue because there's no airflow over the
      > firewall per se)    However,  Only by insulating the firewall side  
      > can we
      > reduce the effects of radiation.    The radiated heat of the engine  
      > and
      > exhaust system will land on the firewall and heat the firewall.   With
      > insulation only on the cabin side, the firewall effectively is  
      > heated and
      > re-radiates into the cabin.   The insulation on the cabin side only  
      > slows
      > the progress of heat flow into the cabin it doesn't prevent it from
      > occuring.   With insulation on the firewall side, the radiated  
      > energy cannot
      > heat the firewall to begin with and therefore should provide less  
      > cabin
      > heating.
      > 3)  Accoustically it should be quieter.   For the same reasons as  
      > in # 2 for
      > heat,  accoustically it should be quiter if the firewall is not  
      > radiated
      > with sound energy.     Theoretically!   will see in practice  
      > hopefully the
      > end of this year.
      >
      >
      > So those our my reasons for insulating the firewall side.   note,   
      > I do plan
      > on corrosion proofing the rivets on the firewall side before  
      > applying the
      > koolmat.
      >
      > FWIW
      >
      >
      > Bob Newman
      > TCW Technologies
      > www.tcwtech.com
      >
      >
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Hartzell 14" Spinner Dimensions | 
      
      I am looking for a dimension from the propeller mounting surface of the 
      engine, to the back edge of the spinner.  I am attempting to mount the 
      cowl (James Cowl) without the prop or spinner in hand, and need this 
      dimension to set the jig used to hold the cowl at the proper dimension 
      from the face of the crank.  There is a rather long lead time on the prop, 
      and I would like to get the cowl positioned so I can continue mounting the 
      plenum, ram air, etc.  If anyone has the Hartzell 14" spinner (A-2297), 
      and the 'standard' Hartzell 2-Blade Blended Airfoil Prop (C2YR-1BFP/F8068D
      ) on hand, I would greatly appreciate any help.  I received some numbers 
      from Hartzell, but am not confident enough to start cutting (they told me 
      .99").  Others have told me that number doesn't seem right, but do not 
      have data one way or the other.
      
      Thanks, Jason
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | RE: Trim Controller | 
      
      Yes it is from the group buy.  If you haven't received an e-mail from Stein
      verifying your order, I would contact him.  Just so all know.  The
      controller does not come with fittings to tie into your pitot/static system
      nor does it come with the 25 pin sub D connector shell or the
      on/off/momentary switch you will kneed.  So if you are just waiting for the
      controller you may want to pick up these things while you wait.
      
      
      Gary
      
      40274
      
      
        _____  
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Hurst
      Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 9:57 PM
      Subject: RV10-List: RE: Trim Controller
      
      
      This wasn't from the "Group buy" was it? 
      
      I haven't received any info from Stein since Jan 23rd and am hoping that I
      haven't deleted something important by mistake.
      
      john
      gary <speckter@comcast.net> wrote:
      
      I just got my trim controller from Stein and have a question that might be
      helpful to all.
      
      
      I got the air switch.  It has a Pitot input and a Static input.  Is there
      any overwhelming reason to plumb the static port into the aircraft system?
      Why not leave it open to the cabin pressure?  Other than being off a few MPH
      from time to time would it make any big difference?
      
      
      Gary
      
      40274
      
      
        _____  
      
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dave Saylor
      Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 12:20 AM
      Subject: RV10-List: Shameless For-Profit Promotion of New RV-10 Products
      
      
      We've posted a few new products on our web site specifically for RV-10s:
      http://www.aircraftersllc.com/products.htm
      
      
      Please call or email with any questions!
      
      
      Dave Saylor
      
      AirCrafters LLC
      
      140 Aviation Way
      
      Watsonville, CA 
      
      831-722-9141
      
      831-750-0284 CL
      
      www.AirCraftersLLC.com
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      John;
      
      Mine came in the mail last night.  Stein called me last week for my 
      credit card information.  Maybe you ought to call them if you haven't 
      heard from them over the last two weeks.
      
      Fred.
      40515
      bonded one door yesterday, whoopee!!
      
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Koolmat Installation | 
      
      
      Actually I didn't man to imply that the firewall was not structural but to inspect
      the firewall and not the structure behind it might allow one to miss damage
      to the structure behind the firewall.
      
      Rick Sked
      40185
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "Rick Sked" <ricksked@embarqmail.com>
      Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 7:14:58 PM (GMT-0800) America/Los_Angeles
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Koolmat Installation
      
      
      OK...
      
      Koolmat is intended as a FIRE BARRIER. It is intended to be installed on the engine
      side firewall. Ask all the NASCAR drivers who experienced catastropic engine
      fires last year how it worked, it's standard equipment. If you have a problem
      with inspecting your firewall, don't use it. I have it on mine, it is held
      by a perimeter bead of red RTV. I can peel it off without much trouble, I have
      done it once already. If you want to bat around the inspection of the firewall
      issue then fine, I can pull my stainless steel  heat valves off, loosen my
      eyeball cable guides, remove my firewall mounted electrial connectors and see
      my firewall in about an hours worth of work. BUT....if I prang a landing, the
      last thing I'm worrying about is the firewall. The firewall is really not a structural
      piece. The weldments and adjoining structural members are the parts that
      will absorb the impact and show signs of STRUCTURAL failure. Yes the firewall
      will wrinkle, but get on your back, scoot your a!
      
       ss under the panel and see what is really bent. Most of us elected to use the
      koolmat to prevent heat buldup in the tunnel. It is a fiberglass mat with a pure
      silicone finish. It is NOT a insulator...it is intended to keep FLAMES from
      breaching the firewall. So screw your indifference. Rob has spelled it out..read
      the spec sheet on the stuff and decide if you want it or not...Look at a tube
      and frame aircraft, the firewall only is intended to keep flames away from
      the cockpit...not provide structural integrity. I'm off the soap box...
      
      Risk Sked
      40185
      Koolmat user
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "Kelly McMullen" <apilot2@gmail.com>
      Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 4:54:29 PM (GMT-0800) America/Los_Angeles
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Koolmat Installation
      
      
      I'm glad there is a difference in your mind. That is the only place
      you will find any difference in R value or acoustic value.
      If it is on the front side, you will NOT be able to properly inspect
      the firewall.
      
      On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Bob-tcw <rnewman@tcwtech.com> wrote:
      >
      >
      > I'm going to use Koolmat on my RV-10,   I'm planning on putting it on the
      > firewall side for the following reasons.
      >
      > 1) The Silicon side of koolmat is quite impervious to oil and fluids.
      > 2) Heat transfer is a function of three modes: Convection, Conduction and
      > Radiation.  Limiting heat transfer into the passanger compartment should
      > best be accomplished by reducing each of these factors.    Insulation on
      > either side of the firewall will be effective at reducing conduction,
      > (convection should not be an issue because there's no airflow over the
      > firewall per se)    However,  Only by insulating the firewall side can we
      > reduce the effects of radiation.    The radiated heat of the engine and
      > exhaust system will land on the firewall and heat the firewall.   With
      > insulation only on the cabin side, the firewall effectively is heated and
      > re-radiates into the cabin.   The insulation on the cabin side only slows
      > the progress of heat flow into the cabin it doesn't prevent it from
      > occuring.   With insulation on the firewall side, the radiated energy cannot
      > heat the firewall to begin with and therefore should provide less cabin
      > heating.
      > 3)  Accoustically it should be quieter.   For the same reasons as in # 2 for
      > heat,  accoustically it should be quiter if the firewall is not radiated
      > with sound energy.     Theoretically!   will see in practice hopefully the
      > end of this year.
      >
      >
      > So those our my reasons for insulating the firewall side.   note,  I do plan
      > on corrosion proofing the rivets on the firewall side before applying the
      > koolmat.
      >
      > FWIW
      >
      >
      > Bob Newman
      > TCW Technologies
      > www.tcwtech.com
      >
      >
      
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Koolmat Installation | 
      
      One of the largest contributors to deaths in aviation is post crash fires  
      often caused by ruptured fuel tanks...has anyone reviewed fuel cell  bladders?
      
      
      **************The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the Grammy 
      Awards. Go to AOL Music.      
      (http://music.aol.com/grammys?NCID=aolcmp00300000002565)
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Hartzell 14" Spinner Dimensions | 
      
      
      Jason. 
      
      I have the same prop but with a standard cowl.  I could measure from the 
      starter ring to the back of the faceplate.  From the face of the starter 
      ring plate to the back of the spinner plate I measure 2.95 inches.  I 
      was able to mic from the face of the tooth to the back and 3.070 
      inches.  Go to the site below to look at pics of where I took the 
      measurements.  Hope this helps. 
      
      Fred.
      
      http://picasaweb.google.com/drfredparis/Engine
      
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: AA Overhead console retrofitting | 
      
      
      About overhead consoles:  I went to the junk yard and picked up the overhead out
      of a late model Chevy Blazer last weekend (it comes out with three screws) --
      complete with wiring harness, front and rear left/right spots, three compartments,
      dome light, AND apparently a compass and temp display ... for $25.  For
      that, I'll make it work!
      
      Later, - Lew
      
      --------
      non-pilot
      crazy about building
      NOW OFICIALLY BUILDER #40549
      Landing gear installed, we're mobile!
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=164190#164190
      
      
Message 12
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Koolmat Installation | 
      
      
      Choices, choices. How do you feel about an extra 35-40 lbs empty weight? 
      I would presume you would want to do slow build wings if you go that 
      direction.
      
      GRANSCOTT@aol.com wrote:
      > One of the largest contributors to deaths in aviation is post crash 
      > fires often caused by ruptured fuel tanks...has anyone reviewed fuel 
      > cell bladders?
      >
      
      
Message 13
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      I agree you don't want to exceed the design envelope for the plane, but it seems
      to me you need to verify the V speeds you can during phase 1. If you are afraid
      to test up to design Vne, your Vne should be set at the fastest speed you
      are willing to test. Maybe I'm just weird, but to me phase 1 is a test period,
      not a "flyoff", so explore the whole flight envelope before you start filling
      up the other seats.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=164198#164198
      
      
Message 14
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Gear Leg Fairing | 
      
      
      Hey Chris.
      
      Here's a follow up comment to your process of adding a strip of glass/epoxy between
      the hinge and the fairing on the strut pants:  I did this (as well as adding
      a layer over the rivet heads)on the nose strut and I ran into this problem
      that others should be aware of.  
      
      When you put pressure on the bond with clecoes, some resin squeezes out between
      the ears of the hinge.  This looked innocent enough at the time and I didn't
      think anything about it.  But then after it hardened and I tried to mate the two
      hinge halves, the slight build up of resin between the ears prevents the mating
      hinge from seating all the way in -- so that even though the hinge pin slides
      freely in each half separately, it won't draw the hinges together -- i.e.,
      you can't get the hinge pin in.  
      
      So after a couple hours of carving out the resin between the ears, it finally mates!
      Whew!  It looks indestructible, but I promise, I will take great care not
      to let the resin get in the way on the main gear strut pants!
      
      Later, - Lew
      
      --------
      non-pilot
      crazy about building
      NOW OFICIALLY BUILDER #40549
      Landing gear installed, we're mobile!
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=164199#164199
      
      
Message 15
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Koolmat Installation | 
      
      Les
      
      A word of caution when using the 3M yellow. If you use it you will have a very
      tough time to remove?the Koolmat for inspection. It is a contact cement made for
      installing automotive weather stripping. It will make your installation permanent.
      Good stuff though for gluing together non similar items. I think for inspection
      purposes the silicone bead will work much better.
      
      Just a thought
      Jeff Nichols
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: Les Kearney <kearney@shaw.ca>
      Sent: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:55 pm
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Koolmat Installation
      
      
      
      Lew
      
      When I spoke to Patty at Koolmat today she suggested using a product called
      "gorilla snot" (I kid you not) to secure the Koolmat. She said it was also
      called "3M Yellow" so I think this is it:
      
      http://www.3mestore.com/62214006090.html?WT.mc_id=3M-com-AtoZ-Super-Weathers
      trip-Adhesive
      
      She also mentioned that you must use a silicone based adhesive to join
      sheets.
      
      Cheers
      
      Les Kearney
      #40643
      C-GCWZ (reserved)
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Lew Gallagher
      Sent: February-14-08 8:37 PM
      Subject: RV10-List: Re: Koolmat Installation
      
      
      Hey Guys,
      
      We're not this far yet, but very interested in the discussion.  If removable
      insulation is desirable, is there a velcro product that could be used here?
      
      Later, - Lew
      
      --------
      non-pilot
      crazy about building
      NOW OFICIALLY BUILDER #40549
      Landing gear installed, we're mobile!
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=164117#164117
      
      
      ________________________________________________________________________
      
Message 16
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: AA Overhead console retrofitting | 
      
      
      How much does it weigh, Lew?
      
      Jack Phillips
      Still waiting for my SB Wing Kit
      #40610
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Lew Gallagher
      Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 9:40 AM
      Subject: RV10-List: Re: AA Overhead console retrofitting
      
      
      About overhead consoles:  I went to the junk yard and picked up the
      overhead out of a late model Chevy Blazer last weekend (it comes out
      with three screws) -- complete with wiring harness, front and rear
      left/right spots, three compartments, dome light, AND apparently a
      compass and temp display ... for $25.  For that, I'll make it work!
      
      Later, - Lew
      
      --------
      non-pilot
      crazy about building
      NOW OFICIALLY BUILDER #40549
      Landing gear installed, we're mobile!
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=164190#164190
      
      
      _________________________________________________
      
      or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify
      the sender
      
      Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - Norsk
      - Portuguese
      
      
Message 17
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Hartzell 14" Spinner Dimensions | 
      
      Jason,
      
      
      I will be doing the same install on my RV-10.  If you have not yet purchased
      the spinner, I just bought one from MustangAero at a much reduced price
      ($885 for the polished version, $785 for the unpolished one).
      
      
      The only recommendation I can offer is to not do any cowl work until you
      have at lease the spinner in hand.  There is a huge slug or work needed to
      get a proper cowl fit.  Without at least the spinners back plate mounted you
      run a risk of doing a lot of rework.
      
      
      Carl Froehlich
      
      RV-8A (400 hrs)
      
      RV-10 (wings) 
      
      
        _____  
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
      jason.kreidler@regalbeloit.com
      Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 8:27 AM
      Subject: RV10-List: Hartzell 14" Spinner Dimensions
      
      
      I am looking for a dimension from the propeller mounting surface of the
      engine, to the back edge of the spinner.  I am attempting to mount the cowl
      (James Cowl) without the prop or spinner in hand, and need this dimension to
      set the jig used to hold the cowl at the proper dimension from the face of
      the crank.  There is a rather long lead time on the prop, and I would like
      to get the cowl positioned so I can continue mounting the plenum, ram air,
      etc.  If anyone has the Hartzell 14" spinner (A-2297), and the 'standard'
      Hartzell 2-Blade Blended Airfoil Prop (C2YR-1BFP/F8068D) on hand, I would
      greatly appreciate any help.  I received some numbers from Hartzell, but am
      not confident enough to start cutting (they told me .99").  Others have told
      me that number doesn't seem right, but do not have data one way or the
      other. 
      
      Thanks, Jason 
      
      
Message 18
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Wisconsin Visit | 
      
      
      Hi Dave,
      
      We're in town now... actually in Whales.  Is there a day/time that  
      works for you?
      
      Jeff
      
      
      On Feb 9, 2008, at 9:25 PM, Dave Leikam wrote:
      
      >
      > Jeff,
      > Give me a call when you get in town.  I live in Muskego and would  
      > love to show you my project if time permits.  Muskego is about 20  
      > min. form Delafield.
      >
      > Dave Leikam
      > #40496
      > 414-807-5499 cell
      >
      > do not archive
      >
      > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Carpenter"  
      > <jeff@westcottpress.com>
      > To: <rv10-list@matronics.com>
      > Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2008 5:58 PM
      > Subject: RV10-List: Wisconsin Visit
      >
      >
      >> <jeff@westcottpress.com>
      >>
      >> The family and I are heading out to Dellafield Wisconsin next week  
      >> to  see some friends.  We'll be in town late Thursday through  
      >> Monday  morning. Weather permitting I'll take my 5 year old son up  
      >> to the  EAA Museum one of the days.  Are there any 10 builders in  
      >> the general  area... Milwaukee, Dellafield, Oshkosh up for a visit?
      >>
      >> Jeff Carpenter
      >> South Pasadena, California
      >> 40304
      >> Almost through the dreaded section 29
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >
      >
      
      
Message 19
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Oil Cooler Aero Duct | 
      
      I made the choice to purchase a premium aero duct to vent my oil cooler
      vs. the standard scat tube. I am trying to optimize the airflow to the
      cooler and maximize its efficiency. The aero duct has less convolutions
      and a smooth silicone inner liner to assist in air flow. It's the same
      duct used for routing air to race car disk brake assemblies.
      Unfortunately it comes in 12' sections for ~$150 delivered (from
      recollection). 
      
      I am offering 3' sections to the list for $35.00 including shipping. I
      have already sent one section to Don McDonald and he seems to be pleased
      with this simple mod.
      
      It's available in any color you want as long as it's Blue (see below).
      
      If anyone is interested please contact me off list.
      
      
      Robin
      
      Robin@PaintTheWeb.com
      
      
Message 20
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Trim Controller | 
      
      Thanks, I though a lot of time had passed since he last contacted me.
      
      John
      
      
      John;
      
      Mine came in the mail last night.  Stein called me last week for my 
      credit card information.  Maybe you ought to call them if you haven't 
      heard from them over the last two weeks.
      
      Fred.
      40515
      bonded one door yesterday, whoopee!!
      
      
Message 21
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Koolmat Installation | 
      
      
      Maybe you could place a scrap of Koolmat on your keyboard
      before you type....
      
      Kevin
      40494
      
      
      ----- Original Message Follows -----
      From: Rick Sked <ricksked@embarqmail.com>
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Koolmat Installation
      
      ><ricksked@embarqmail.com>
      >
      >OK...
      >
      >Koolmat is intended as a FIRE BARRIER. It is intended to be
      >installed on the engine side firewall. Ask all the NASCAR
      >drivers who experienced catastropic engine fires last year
      >how it worked, it's standard equipment. If you have a
      >problem with inspecting your firewall, don't use it. I have
      >it on mine, it is held by a perimeter bead of red RTV. I
      >can peel it off without much trouble, I have done it once
      >already. If you want to bat around the inspection of the
      >firewall issue then fine, I can pull my stainless steel 
      >heat valves off, loosen my eyeball cable guides, remove my
      >firewall mounted electrial connectors and see my firewall
      >in about an hours worth of work. BUT....if I prang a
      >landing, the last thing I'm worrying about is the firewall.
      >The firewall is really not a structural piece. The
      >weldments and adjoining structural members are the parts
      >that will absorb the impact and show signs of STRUCTURAL
      >failure. Yes the firewall will wrinkle, but get on your
      >back, scoot your a!
      > ss under the panel and see what is really bent. Most of us
      >elected to use the koolmat to prevent heat buldup in the
      >tunnel. It is a fiberglass mat with a pure silicone finish.
      >It is NOT a insulator...it is intended to keep FLAMES from
      >breaching the firewall. So screw your indifference. Rob has
      >spelled it out..read the spec sheet on the stuff and decide
      >if you want it or not...Look at a tube and frame aircraft,
      >the firewall only is intended to keep flames away from the
      >cockpit...not provide structural integrity. I'm off the
      >soap box...
      >
      >Risk Sked
      >40185
      >Koolmat user
      
      
Message 22
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Koolmat Installation | 
      
      
      LOL...OK...that's funny...you win.
      Rick S.
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: kilopapa@antelecom.net
      Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 6:36:21 PM (GMT-0800) America/Los_Angeles
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Koolmat Installation
      
      
      Maybe you could place a scrap of Koolmat on your keyboard
      before you type....
      
      Kevin
      40494
      
      
      ----- Original Message Follows -----
      From: Rick Sked <ricksked@embarqmail.com>
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Koolmat Installation
      
      ><ricksked@embarqmail.com>
      >
      >OK...
      >
      >Koolmat is intended as a FIRE BARRIER. It is intended to be
      >installed on the engine side firewall. Ask all the NASCAR
      >drivers who experienced catastropic engine fires last year
      >how it worked, it's standard equipment. If you have a
      >problem with inspecting your firewall, don't use it. I have
      >it on mine, it is held by a perimeter bead of red RTV. I
      >can peel it off without much trouble, I have done it once
      >already. If you want to bat around the inspection of the
      >firewall issue then fine, I can pull my stainless steel 
      >heat valves off, loosen my eyeball cable guides, remove my
      >firewall mounted electrial connectors and see my firewall
      >in about an hours worth of work. BUT....if I prang a
      >landing, the last thing I'm worrying about is the firewall.
      >The firewall is really not a structural piece. The
      >weldments and adjoining structural members are the parts
      >that will absorb the impact and show signs of STRUCTURAL
      >failure. Yes the firewall will wrinkle, but get on your
      >back, scoot your a!
      > ss under the panel and see what is really bent. Most of us
      >elected to use the koolmat to prevent heat buldup in the
      >tunnel. It is a fiberglass mat with a pure silicone finish.
      >It is NOT a insulator...it is intended to keep FLAMES from
      >breaching the firewall. So screw your indifference. Rob has
      >spelled it out..read the spec sheet on the stuff and decide
      >if you want it or not...Look at a tube and frame aircraft,
      >the firewall only is intended to keep flames away from the
      >cockpit...not provide structural integrity. I'm off the
      >soap box...
      >
      >Risk Sked
      >40185
      >Koolmat user
      
      
Message 23
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Koolmat Installation | 
      
      Hi
      
      
      Thanks for the heads up. I plant to use RTV *sparingly*. I just couldn't
      bring myself to use something called "gorilla snot". My daughter would never
      let me hear the end of it..
      
      
      Cheers
      
      
      Les 
      
      
      Do not archive
      
      
        _____  
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
      nicholscatoauto@aol.com
      Sent: February-15-08 7:59 AM
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Koolmat Installation
      
      
      Les
      
      A word of caution when using the 3M yellow. If you use it you will have a
      very tough time to remove the Koolmat for inspection. It is a contact cement
      made for installing automotive weather stripping. It will make your
      installation permanent. Good stuff though for gluing together non similar
      items. I think for inspection purposes the silicone bead will work much
      better.
      
      Just a thought
      Jeff Nichols
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: Les Kearney <kearney@shaw.ca>
      Sent: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:55 pm
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Koolmat Installation
      
      
      Lew
      
      When I spoke to Patty at Koolmat today she suggested using a product called
      "gorilla snot" (I kid you not) to secure the Koolmat. She said it was also
      called "3M Yellow" so I think this is it:
      
      http://www.3mestore.com/62214006090.html?WT.mc_id=3M-com-AtoZ-Super-Weathers
      trip-Adhesive
      
      She also mentioned that you must use a silicone based adhesive to join
      sheets.
      
      Cheers
      
      Les Kearney
      #40643
      C-GCWZ (reserved)
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      <mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com?> ] On Behalf Of Lew Gallagher
      Sent: February-14-08 8:37 PM
      Subject: RV10-List: Re: Koolmat Installation
      
      
      Hey Guys,
      
      We're not this far yet, but very interested in the discussion.  If removable
      insulation is desirable, is there a velcro product that could be used here?
      
      Later, - Lew
      
      --------
      non-pilot
      crazy about building
      NOW OFICIALLY BUILDER #40549
      Landing gear installed, we're mobile!
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=164117#164117
      
      
        _____  
      
      size=2 width="100%" align=center> 
      
      <http://o.aolcdn.com/cdn.webmail.aol.com/mailtour/aol/en-us/text.htm?ncid=ao
      lcmp00050000000003> !
      
      
Message 24
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Koolmat Installation | 
      
      An alternative. When in doubt push the fire handle. 
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
      kilopapa@antelecom.net
      Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 7:36 PM
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Koolmat Installation
      
      
      Maybe you could place a scrap of Koolmat on your keyboard before you
      type....
      
      Kevin
      40494
      
      
      ----- Original Message Follows -----
      From: Rick Sked <ricksked@embarqmail.com>
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Koolmat Installation
      
      ><ricksked@embarqmail.com>
      >
      >OK...
      >
      >Koolmat is intended as a FIRE BARRIER. It is intended to be installed 
      >on the engine side firewall. Ask all the NASCAR drivers who experienced 
      >catastropic engine fires last year how it worked, it's standard 
      >equipment. If you have a problem with inspecting your firewall, don't 
      >use it. I have it on mine, it is held by a perimeter bead of red RTV. I 
      >can peel it off without much trouble, I have done it once already. If 
      >you want to bat around the inspection of the firewall issue then fine, 
      >I can pull my stainless steel heat valves off, loosen my eyeball cable 
      >guides, remove my firewall mounted electrial connectors and see my 
      >firewall in about an hours worth of work. BUT....if I prang a landing, 
      >the last thing I'm worrying about is the firewall.
      >The firewall is really not a structural piece. The weldments and 
      >adjoining structural members are the parts that will absorb the impact 
      >and show signs of STRUCTURAL failure. Yes the firewall will wrinkle, 
      >but get on your back, scoot your a!
      > ss under the panel and see what is really bent. Most of us elected to 
      >use the koolmat to prevent heat buldup in the tunnel. It is a 
      >fiberglass mat with a pure silicone finish.
      >It is NOT a insulator...it is intended to keep FLAMES from breaching 
      >the firewall. So screw your indifference. Rob has spelled it out..read 
      >the spec sheet on the stuff and decide if you want it or not...Look at 
      >a tube and frame aircraft, the firewall only is intended to keep flames 
      >away from the cockpit...not provide structural integrity. I'm off the 
      >soap box...
      >
      >Risk Sked
      >40185
      >Koolmat user
      
      
Message 25
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | New service letter on RV10 | 
      
      Just received a new service letter, in the mail, on the door warning switch
      es shipped after August 2006. Here is a link to it on Van's site:
      http://www.vansaircraft.com/pdf/letters/10_door_latch_switches.pdf
      
      Vern Smith (#324)
      _________________________________________________________________
      Helping your favorite cause is as easy as instant messaging.-You IM, we g
      ive.
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |