RV10-List Digest Archive

Sat 12/13/08


Total Messages Posted: 6



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 08:58 AM - Re: Indicator lights - what functions to include (marcausman)
     2. 01:12 PM - Battery Size (Rene)
     3. 01:36 PM - Re: Battery Size (Carl Froehlich)
     4. 02:01 PM - Re: Engine mounting ear nut torque (Patrick Thyssen)
     5. 03:03 PM - Re: Battery Size (Kevin Belue)
     6. 04:55 PM - Re: Battery Size (Kelly McMullen)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:58:02 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Indicator lights - what functions to include
    From: "marcausman" <marc@verticalpower.com>
    Yes, I concur. I have the alarms on the EFIS, and not the EIS which is buried. The VP-200 handles all the annunciations and electrical alarms. avu1(at)md.metrocast.net wrote: > To summarize the various responses: > > Engine information from the EIS can be repeated on the GRT EFIS. > Alert limits are set on either system independent of one another. > Either system can be programmed to have no alerts. > Alerts generated by one system are not displayed on the other. > Alerts tripped by one system can only be reset/acknowledged by that system. > Either system can have an external light which blinks when tripped based > on programmed limits, steady when acknowledged, goes away when problem is > no longer there. > Leveraging the capability of each system can eliminate the need for the > EIS remote button. > > -------- Marc Ausman http://www.verticalpower.com RV-7 IO-390 Flying Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=219214#219214


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:12:56 PM PST US
    From: "Rene" <rene@felker.com>
    Subject: Battery Size
    Some background. As I was building.........I was worried about the CG being to far forward and thus I was not concerned about putting in a bigger battery (Odyssey 925 at 24 LBS) and my O2 system behind the rear bulkhead. In the end, that left my empty weight CG at 109.22, which is pretty far aft. My first annual is due in Jan and thus I am considering options for moving the CG forward. I have a little more interior work to do, but I do not think it will have any affect. One of the options I am considering in moving the battery from the normal location behind the bulkhead and mounting it on the firewall. My rough calculation is the empty weight CG will move to 107.58 a little forward of the forward edge of the envelope. (this does not include some of the wiring changes which will also move the CG a little forward also.....). So here is the real question, anyone flying out there with just one PC680 battery? If so have you found it adequate? I am a little like Tim Taylor....why use a 680 anmp battery when you can get a 925 amp battery, but do I need all of that power. I have a standby alternator (8 amp) and a backup battery for my Alamo instruments (AS, Altimeter and ADI). So I am not to worried about the loss of the primary altinator Anybody have any other ideas? Rene' 801-721-6080


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:36:50 PM PST US
    From: "Carl Froehlich" <carl.froehlich@cox.net>
    Subject: Battery Size
    If it works for your CG, another option is to use two identical but smaller batteries, one aft one forward. These would replace your one big battery and your small backup battery. Run them in parallel for normal ops, split if you have an problem on one side. PC-625s are more than adequate for starting. My normal maintenance is to replace one battery every other year. The old ones end up in law tractors and such - still going strong years later. Carl Froehlich RV-8A (450 hrs) RV-10 (fuselage) -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rene Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 4:13 PM Subject: RV10-List: Battery Size Some background. As I was building.........I was worried about the CG being to far forward and thus I was not concerned about putting in a bigger battery (Odyssey 925 at 24 LBS) and my O2 system behind the rear bulkhead. In the end, that left my empty weight CG at 109.22, which is pretty far aft. My first annual is due in Jan and thus I am considering options for moving the CG forward. I have a little more interior work to do, but I do not think it will have any affect. One of the options I am considering in moving the battery from the normal location behind the bulkhead and mounting it on the firewall. My rough calculation is the empty weight CG will move to 107.58 a little forward of the forward edge of the envelope. (this does not include some of the wiring changes which will also move the CG a little forward also.....). So here is the real question, anyone flying out there with just one PC680 battery? If so have you found it adequate? I am a little like Tim Taylor....why use a 680 anmp battery when you can get a 925 amp battery, but do I need all of that power. I have a standby alternator (8 amp) and a backup battery for my Alamo instruments (AS, Altimeter and ADI). So I am not to worried about the loss of the primary altinator Anybody have any other ideas? Rene' 801-721-6080


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:01:58 PM PST US
    From: Patrick Thyssen <jump2@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Re: Engine mounting ear nut torque
    The torque will be in your maintenace manual. If it is different it will be indicated as such. Don't forget your maintenance overhaul manual composes also of SB, SL and SI. as stated in the front of your maintenance book. -And when you do your mags repair don't forget section 8 of the unison/sl ick- manuals. Otherwise you really are experimenting. Right Tim. -Pat Thyssen --- On Fri, 12/12/08, Chris <toaster73@embarqmail.com> wrote: From: Chris <toaster73@embarqmail.com> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Engine mounting ear nut torque Thats what I need but don't have one yet...figured someone on the list may have one at their finger tips.- I wasn't sure I would want to use the standard torque since the stud is in Al housing. Othe r folks are checking so if I hear from my local builder friends I'll let you know. Thanks -Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: Jesse Saint To: rv10-list@matronics.com Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 8:49 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Engine mounting ear nut torque You can look in the Engine Overhaul Manual if you have one and if it isn't specified then you use the general table of torque values for the engine. -I have one, but don't have access to it right now. -I'll look later if someone else hasn't already helped you by then. do not archive Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. jesse@saintaviation.com Cell: 352-427-0285 Fax: 815-377-3694 On Dec 11, 2008, at 7:39 PM, Chris wrote: Checked the archives with no luck, can't seem to find any info in engine documentation, therefore does anybody know t he torque required for the nuts which hold the ears on the IO-540-D4A5 ? I ts a 3/8 stud so does the usual torque number apply? Thanks Chris Lucas #40072http://www.matronics.com/contribution href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics. com/Navigator?RV10-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/chr ef="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.co m/Navigator?RV10-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:03:44 PM PST US
    From: "Kevin Belue" <kdbelue@charter.net>
    Subject: Re: Battery Size
    Rene, I have 2 PC680 batteries in my RV10. One is for the main bus and the other is backup and for the EFIS to boot on during start. I can switch in both batteries for start if needed. My experience has been that 1 PC680 starts my RV-6A just fine, but it's not really enough for the IO540. It will start it but sometimes I have to use both batteries when it is cold and it still just barely gets it started. I'm using a skytec PM starter, so I different starter might help. Kevin Belue RV-6A Flying RV-10 Flying ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rene" <rene@felker.com> Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 3:12 PM Subject: RV10-List: Battery Size > > Some background. As I was building.........I was worried about the CG > being > to far forward and thus I was not concerned about putting in a bigger > battery (Odyssey 925 at 24 LBS) and my O2 system behind the rear bulkhead. > In the end, that left my empty weight CG at 109.22, which is pretty far > aft. > > > My first annual is due in Jan and thus I am considering options for moving > the CG forward. I have a little more interior work to do, but I do not > think it will have any affect. > > One of the options I am considering in moving the battery from the normal > location behind the bulkhead and mounting it on the firewall. My rough > calculation is the empty weight CG will move to 107.58 a little forward of > the forward edge of the envelope. (this does not include some of the > wiring > changes which will also move the CG a little forward also.....). > > So here is the real question, anyone flying out there with just one PC680 > battery? If so have you found it adequate? I am a little like Tim > Taylor....why use a 680 anmp battery when you can get a 925 amp battery, > but > do I need all of that power. > > I have a standby alternator (8 amp) and a backup battery for my Alamo > instruments (AS, Altimeter and ADI). So I am not to worried about the > loss > of the primary altinator > > Anybody have any other ideas? > > > Rene' > 801-721-6080 > > >


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:55:12 PM PST US
    From: Kelly McMullen <kellym@aviating.com>
    Subject: Re: Battery Size
    Skytec PM starters have about the highest current draw out there. The NL series takes maybe 10-20% less, and the Kelly E-drive takes about 1/2 the current of the Skytec PM. Kevin Belue wrote: > > Rene, > > I have 2 PC680 batteries in my RV10. One is for the main bus and the > other is backup and for the EFIS to boot on during start. I can switch > in both batteries for start if needed. My experience has been that 1 > PC680 starts my RV-6A just fine, but it's not really enough for the > IO540. It will start it but sometimes I have to use both batteries > when it is cold and it still just barely gets it started. I'm using a > skytec PM starter, so I different starter might help. > > Kevin Belue > RV-6A Flying > RV-10 Flying > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rene" <rene@felker.com> > To: <rv10-list@matronics.com> > Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 3:12 PM > Subject: RV10-List: Battery Size > > >> >> Some background. As I was building.........I was worried about the >> CG being >> to far forward and thus I was not concerned about putting in a bigger >> battery (Odyssey 925 at 24 LBS) and my O2 system behind the rear >> bulkhead. >> In the end, that left my empty weight CG at 109.22, which is pretty >> far aft. >> >> >> My first annual is due in Jan and thus I am considering options for >> moving >> the CG forward. I have a little more interior work to do, but I do not >> think it will have any affect. >> >> One of the options I am considering in moving the battery from the >> normal >> location behind the bulkhead and mounting it on the firewall. My rough >> calculation is the empty weight CG will move to 107.58 a little >> forward of >> the forward edge of the envelope. (this does not include some of the >> wiring >> changes which will also move the CG a little forward also.....). >> >> So here is the real question, anyone flying out there with just one >> PC680 >> battery? If so have you found it adequate? I am a little like Tim >> Taylor....why use a 680 anmp battery when you can get a 925 amp >> battery, but >> do I need all of that power. >> >> I have a standby alternator (8 amp) and a backup battery for my Alamo >> instruments (AS, Altimeter and ADI). So I am not to worried about >> the loss >> of the primary altinator >> >> Anybody have any other ideas? >> >> >> >> Rene' >> 801-721-6080 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv10-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV10-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv10-list
  • Browse RV10-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --