RV10-List Digest Archive

Sat 01/31/09


Total Messages Posted: 21



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:42 AM - weight & balance program (rvdave)
     2. 06:11 AM - Re: Van's tach (PJ Seipel)
     3. 07:08 AM - Re: heads up (Kelly McMullen)
     4. 07:14 AM - Re: Re: 406 MHZ ELT (Kelly McMullen)
     5. 07:19 AM - Re: Re: 406 MHZ ELT (Tim Olson)
     6. 08:00 AM - Re: Glad to be hangered! (RV Builder (Michael Sausen))
     7. 08:00 AM - Re: Re: Van's Whelen/ELT bracket (RV Builder (Michael Sausen))
     8. 08:36 AM - Re: Van's Whelen/ELT bracket (tsts4)
     9. 08:50 AM - Re: Glad to be hangered! (Robin Marks)
    10. 11:00 AM - test - please ignore (Tim Lewis)
    11. 01:03 PM - Tru Trak (RV-10) roll servo stop plate  (Tim Lewis)
    12. 01:43 PM - Re: weight & balance program (Ted French)
    13. 03:14 PM - Re: Glad to be hangered! (Dave Leikam)
    14. 03:45 PM - Re: Glad to be hangered! (Bob Kaufmann)
    15. 06:22 PM - Re: Tru Trak (RV-10) roll servo stop plate (John Hilger)
    16. 06:25 PM - Re: Re: 406 MHZ ELT (Bill DeRouchey)
    17. 07:01 PM - Re: Re: 406 MHZ ELT (Patrick Thyssen)
    18. 07:43 PM - Re: Tru Trak (RV-10) roll servo stop plate (Larry Rosen)
    19. 08:22 PM - Re: Mistake on the aft deck (Rick Sked)
    20. 09:07 PM - Deburring (Doug Gee)
    21. 10:42 PM - Re: Re: Van's Whelen/ELT bracket (Vernon Smith)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:42:06 AM PST US
    Subject: weight & balance program
    From: "rvdave" <davidbf@centurytel.net>
    Is there a weight & balance program for the 10 that anyone has written? I know there is an older one here http://www.matronics.com/searching/getmsg_script.cgi?INDEX=135332088?KEYS=weight_&_balance_program?LISTNAME=RV?HITNUMBER=2?SERIAL=0501037899?SHOWBUTTONS=YES but it doesn't allow any parameters to change without a password. -------- Dave Ford RV6 flying RV10 building Lake City, MI based at CAD Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=227851#227851


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:11:44 AM PST US
    From: PJ Seipel <seipel@seznam.cz>
    Subject: Re: Van's tach
    You need the 12" extension. I believe you can get just the extension and add it to the transducer. Part number is IE VTACH EXT12 PJ Seipel RV-10 #40032 partner14 wrote: > > I have dual lightspeed ignition, and now understand that it will not communicate with the Van's tach. So I ordered the tranducer. But upon receipt I then realized that with the backup SD20 Alternator mounted on the rear of the engine, there's no room to get the transducer to fit. > Has ANYONE found a solution to this? Is there another way to provide the Van's tach with the required input. > Thanks guys, Don McDonald > > -------- > Don A. McDonald > 40636 > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=227818#227818 > > >


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:08:52 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: heads up
    From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2@gmail.com>
    You can see that setup on many a Cessna, combo tail skid and tiedown ring. Heck, even my Mooney has a tail skid. Helps when pilot gets confused and tries to land it like a taildragger. ;-) On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Dave Leikam <daveleikam@wi.rr.com> wrote: > After having read about this before, I will probably mount a small piece of > spring steel in the shape of a "U" at the tie down point using the tie down > ring to hold it in place. Haven't decided where to get the spring steel > yet, but that's my thought. > > Dave Leikam > RV-10 #40496 > N89DA (Reserved) > Muskego, WI > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Scott Schmidt > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 3:07 PM > Subject: Re: RV10-List: heads up > This has happened to many of us early on and was posted multiple times but > it is good to repeat from time to time as it is sometimes difficult to read > all the posts. > My standard for loading is one person in back, one in front, then the second > in back and finally the pilot. > The issue arises when you have two in back and two people step up at the > same time. That is like having two guys in the baggage compartment and two > in the back seats. > I also de-plane the same way. Also keep your tie-down in at all times. I > have had it tip one other time but it just hit the tie down ring like > previously mentioned. > > > Scott Schmidt > scottmschmidt@yahoo.com > > > ________________________________ > From: Bill DeRouchey <billderou@yahoo.com> > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 9:32:03 AM > Subject: Re: RV10-List: heads up > > This is why we always have the tail tie-down ring installed. > > Bill DeRouchey > N939SB > > --- On Thu, 1/29/09, David McNeill <dlm46007@cox.net> wrote: > > From: David McNeill <dlm46007@cox.net> > Subject: RV10-List: heads up > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Date: Thursday, January 29, 2009, 12:39 PM > > When carrying four adults, be aware that one front seater should remain > seated while back seaters deplane. While I stood on the wing this morning, > the right seat passenger decided to deplane and stepped on the rear dismount > while the rear passengers remain seated. The aircraft tilted to the rear and > struck the bottom rudder fairing. Fortunately the damage seems limited to > the bottom rudder fairing which will be replaced. Unfortunately I have not > added the additional firewall avionics battery which probably would have > eliminated this incident.. > > > href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com > href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c > >


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:14:02 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: RE: 406 MHZ ELT
    From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2@gmail.com>
    Precisely. Been doing it that way for years. That is what I meant by old method. In fact that method was first demonstrated to me by an avionics shop over 20 years ago. Keep in mind that the FAA works in strange ways, and hasn't updated 43.13-1B in 8 years. I won't hold my breath as to how long before they update an AC for 406 ELTs. Like the AIM, ACs are good guidance, but they aren't the reg, (except for GPSs). 2009/1/31 Patrick Thyssen <jump2@sbcglobal.net>: > Ok, heres a Hint.. > VHF, AM radio. Read AC43.13.chapter 12 > Ask your Faa inspector. I did not read or ask one day on a part135 > inspection. > Patrick Thyssen > > --- On Fri, 1/30/09, Kelly McMullen <kellym@aviating.com> wrote: > > From: Kelly McMullen <kellym@aviating.com> > Subject: Re: RV10-List: RE: 406 MHZ ELT > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Date: Friday, January 30, 2009, 6:48 PM > > > Yes, the old method WILL work on all ELTs. Point is there is NO regulatory > requirement to test the ELT on anything but 121.5. All units still broadcast > 121.5, as it is a requirement of the TSO. In fact 91.207 does not > specify a > frequency, so you are free to test its broadcast as you see fit(within the 5 > min > after hour). > KM > A&P/IA > Steven Roberts wrote: >> >> Patrick, >> >> The old method won't work on the 406 MHz ELT's. That was the point I > was trying to make. For one thing, 406 MHz is outside the frequency range of > VHF > airband receivers. Secondly, the old ELTs are amplitude modulated, the new > ELTs > are frequency modulated. Lastly, the old ELTs are a continuous wave analog > tone, > while the new ELT's are a short burst of digital data, very close to the way > cellphone and wifi transmitters work. The short pulse allows a high power > (five > watt) signal from a very small battery. You need a special receiver to > receive > the signal and a digital processor to decode the data. That's what you get > for > 3 AMU's. >> >> (AMU is the American Monetary Unit or $1,000 US dollars. Also equivalent > to one > AJU, the American Jewelry Unit) J >> >> Steve Roberts >> >> (still lurking while waiting for a suitable build location) >> >> N2700W 1966 Mooney M20E 'Ms. Obsession' KMOR Morristown, TN >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> *From:* owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Patrick Thyssen >> *Sent:* Friday, January 30, 2009 9:44 AM >> *To:* rv10-list@matronics.com >> *Subject:* Re: RV10-List: RE: 406 MHZ ELT >> >> Steve, >> >> You might want to look up in ac43.13 chapter 12 about checking ELTs. using > a VHF radio. >> >> Patrick Thyssen >> >> One day I to will fly. >> >> >> ** >> * * >> >> * >> >> >> > -= --> > >


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:19:51 AM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: RE: 406 MHZ ELT
    Patrick, I'm trying to figure out which side of the argument you're arguing for.... I read the AC43.13 chapter 12, and see nothing really related to 406Mhz ELT's other than normal ELT Checks, and since they also broadcast 121.5, that should make inspecting easy. But it's not a FAR, it's all in the AC. Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying do not archive Patrick Thyssen wrote: > Ok, heres a Hint.. > VHF, AM radio. Read AC43.13.chapter 12 > Ask your Faa inspector. I did not read or ask one day on a part135 > inspection. > Patrick Thyssen > > --- On *Fri, 1/30/09, Kelly McMullen /<kellym@aviating.com>/* wrote: > > From: Kelly McMullen <kellym@aviating.com> > Subject: Re: RV10-List: RE: 406 MHZ ELT > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Date: Friday, January 30, 2009, 6:48 PM > > > Yes, the old method WILL work on all ELTs. Point is there is NO regulatory > requirement to test the ELT on anything but 121.5. All units still broadcast > 121.5, as it is a requirement of the TSO. In fact 91.207 does not > specify a > frequency, so you are free to test its broadcast as you see fit(within the 5 min > after hour). > KM > A&P/IA > Steven Roberts wrote: > > > > Patrick, > > > > The old method wont work on the 406 MHz ELTs. That was the point I > was trying to make. For one thing, 406 MHz is outside the frequency range of VHF > airband receivers. Secondly, the old ELTs are amplitude modulated, the new ELTs > are frequency modulated. Lastly, the old ELTs are a continuous wave analog tone, > while the new ELTs are a short burst of digital data, very close to the way > cellphone and wifi transmitters work. The short pulse allows a high power (five > watt) signal from a very small battery. You need a special receiver to receive > the signal and a digital processor to decode the data. Thats what you get for > 3 AMUs. > > > > (AMU is the American Monetary Unit or $1,000 US dollars. Also equivalent > to one > AJU, the American Jewelry Unit) J > > > > Steve Roberts > > > > (still lurking while waiting for a suitable build location) > > > > N2700W 1966 Mooney M20E Ms. Obsession KMOR Morristown, TN > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Patrick Thyssen > > *Sent:* Friday, January 30, 2009 9:44 AM > > *To:* rv10-list@matronics.com > > *Subject:* Re: RV10-List: RE: 406 MHZ ELT > > > > Steve, > > > > You might want to look up in ac43.13 chapter 12 about checking ELTs. using > a VHF radio. > > > > Patrick Thyssen > > > > One day I to will fly. > > > > > > ** > > * * > > > > * > > > > > > > -= --> > > > > > * > > > *


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:00:42 AM PST US
    From: "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)" <rvbuilder@sausen.net>
    Subject: Glad to be hangered!
    Ya, except we have one of the biggest faults in the county here in the Midw est. Fortunately it's also one of the least active! :) Michael From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@m atronics.com] On Behalf Of Dave Leikam Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 10:24 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Glad to be hangered! Yeah but we don't get those darn earthquakes here in the Midwest ;-) Dave Leikam RV-10 #40496 N89DA (Reserved) Muskego, WI do not archive


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:00:45 AM PST US
    From: "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)" <rvbuilder@sausen.net>
    Subject: Re: Van's Whelen/ELT bracket
    Thanks guys, I figured it was mounted to the J Channel. That's basically what I needed as I'm looking for someplace to mount my Mountain High tank filler. Mine is the one with the gauge otherwise I would have mounted it through the rear bulkhead somewhere. Michael Do not archive -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of tsts4 Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 6:58 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Van's Whelen/ELT bracket I have the instructions but no way to post them electronically. I can either type them out here (there's 5 steps) or if you post or PM me a fax number I can send them that way. It gets installed between the F-1047C-L and F-1047D-L J-stiffeners, and between the F-1006 and f-1007 Frames, but closer to the F-1006. You slide it fore and aft to get a good fit. The outside face of the bracket's top flange goes against the bottom side of the 1047C stiffener, while the inside face of the bracket's bottom flange goes against the bottom side of the 1047D stiffener. The instructions have a drawing that makes this arrangement perfectly clear. -------- Todd Stovall 728TT (reserved) RV-10 Empacone


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:36:36 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Van's Whelen/ELT bracket
    From: "tsts4" <tsts4@verizon.net>
    I just faxed a copy to Jesse so he can post. -------- Todd Stovall 728TT (reserved) RV-10 Empacone Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=227873#227873


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:50:26 AM PST US
    Subject: Glad to be hangered!
    From: "Robin Marks" <robin1@mrmoisture.com>
    Dave, Do you really want to start the whole Earthquake vs. Sunshine debate. Allow me to repeat: Oh noooooo, Wednesday we are going to have AM clouds and it's not even going to reach 80. I'm moving. Robin Do Not Archive From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dave Leikam Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 8:24 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Glad to be hangered! Yeah but we don't get those darn earthquakes here in the Midwest ;-) Dave Leikam RV-10 #40496 N89DA (Reserved) Muskego, WI do not archive ----- Original Message ----- From: Robin Marks <mailto:robin1@mrmoisture.com> To: rv10-list@matronics.com Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 12:51 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Glad to be hangered! Stein understands if the staff is out playing golf, panels aren't getting built. Let it snow, let it snow, let it snow. Robin VFR Anyone? Do Not Archive From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bob Kaufmann Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 6:30 PM To: rv10-list@matronics.com Subject: RE: RV10-List: Glad to be hangered! Struggling to maintain composure as it gets to 61 today. Oh well maybe it will be better tomorrow. You could always move here Stein. Bob K Lovely Las Vegas Do not archive. From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of SteinAir, Inc. Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 5:09 PM To: rv10-list@matronics.com Subject: RE: RV10-List: Glad to be hangered! I'll try to send some that way....I think we got up to 3 yesterday, although today it warmed up nicely to 14...currently sitting at a balmy 9 degrees F. Back down to -11 tonight, but warmer weather comin! Cheers, Stein do not archive -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of McGANN, Ron Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 3:54 PM To: rv10-list@matronics.com Subject: RE: RV10-List: Glad to be hangered! Want to send some cool weather our way?? 125 degs in my hangar and on the apron at the moment. Wanna know how frustrating that is when you are trying to do a first engine start???? cheers, Ron -187, waiting for the temperature to COOOOL!! ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of jim@combsfive.com Sent: Friday, 30 January 2009 1:19 AM To: rv10-list@matronics.com Subject: RV10-List: Glad to be hangered! We had some serious Ice and snow over the last few days. I got out to the airport and was really glad I was in a hanger! All aircraft had become tail draggers! Hope none are damaged! Jim Combs N312F - Flying Do Not Archive "Warning: The information contained in this email and any attached files is confidential to BAE Systems Australia. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this email or any attachments is expressly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately. VIRUS: Every care has been taken to ensure this email and its attachments are virus free, however, any loss or damage incurred in using this email is not the sender's responsibility. It is your responsibility to ensure virus checks are completed before installing any data sent in this email to your computer." href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronic s .com/Navigator?RV10-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List http://forums.matronics.com http://www.matronics.com/contribution http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List http://forums.matronics.com http://www.matronics.com/contribution


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:00:17 AM PST US
    From: Tim Lewis <timrvator@comcast.net>
    Subject: test - please ignore
    -- Tim Lewis -- HEF (Manassas, VA) RV-6A N47TD -- 1000 hrs RV-10 #40059 under construction


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:03:04 PM PST US
    From: Tim Lewis <timrvator@comcast.net>
    Subject: Tru Trak (RV-10) roll servo stop plate
    Tru Trak's RV-10 roll servo installation diagram is at <http://www.trutrakap.com/documents/RV10RollInstallation.pdf>. In the first photo, item "F" is the servo stop plate. That stop plate is held on by two little 6-32 screws, 1/4" long, which only engage about one thread (!) into the servo body (due to the short 1/4" length of the screws and the AN960-10 washer spacer called out in step F). I'm not very comfortable with this arrangement. Only a single thread engagement (1 turn of the screw) leaves me feeling there's risk of the screw stripping and/or backing out and leaving the stop plate not properly attached. I don't like the picture of the stop plate rattling around where it can jam the aircraft roll control. For those who have installed this system and gotten it flying, do you find that the stop plate is needed, or does the RV-10's aileron stop system keep the servo arm from running up to the stops provided by the servo's stop plate? Have others taken steps to better secure the stop plate? Thanks, Tim -- Tim Lewis -- HEF (Manassas, VA) RV-6A N47TD -- 1000 hrs RV-10 #40059 under construction


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:43:58 PM PST US
    From: "Ted French" <ted_french@telus.net>
    Subject: weight & balance program
    Take a look at this one.... http://www3.telus.net/elfrench/RV-10_Weight_and_Balance.xls Do Not Archive Ted French C-FXCS RV-10 Flying -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of rvdave Sent: January 31, 2009 5:20 AM Subject: RV10-List: weight & balance program Is there a weight & balance program for the 10 that anyone has written? I know there is an older one here http://www.matronics.com/searching/getmsg_script.cgi?INDEX=135332088?KEYS=we ight_&_balance_program?LISTNAME=RV?HITNUMBER=2?SERIAL=0501037899?SHOWBUTTONS =YES but it doesn't allow any parameters to change without a password. -------- Dave Ford RV6 flying RV10 building Lake City, MI based at CAD Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=227851#227851


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:14:55 PM PST US
    From: "Dave Leikam" <daveleikam@wi.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Glad to be hangered!
    Yeah and we get heat lightning too !! (couldn't help myself Mike :-D) do not archive ----- Original Message ----- From: RV Builder (Michael Sausen) To: rv10-list@matronics.com Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 9:35 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Glad to be hangered! Ya, except we have one of the biggest faults in the county here in the Midwest. Fortunately it's also one of the least active! J Michael From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dave Leikam Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 10:24 PM To: rv10-list@matronics.com Subject: Re: RV10-List: Glad to be hangered! Yeah but we don't get those darn earthquakes here in the Midwest ;-) Dave Leikam RV-10 #40496 N89DA (Reserved) Muskego, WI do not archive


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:45:47 PM PST US
    From: "Bob Kaufmann" <bob.kaufmann@cox.net>
    Subject: Glad to be hangered!
    But lets talk about thunderstorms, tornadoes, and bugs and humidity. Bob K Working all day in my last Stein Air t shirt in 65 degree weather. From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dave Leikam Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 8:24 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Glad to be hangered! Yeah but we don't get those darn earthquakes here in the Midwest ;-) Dave Leikam RV-10 #40496 N89DA (Reserved) Muskego, WI do not archive ----- Original Message ----- From: Robin Marks <mailto:robin1@mrmoisture.com> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 12:51 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Glad to be hangered! Stein understands if the staff is out playing golf, panels aren't getting built. Let it snow, let it snow, let it snow. Robin VFR Anyone? WX.jpg Do Not Archive From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bob Kaufmann Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 6:30 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Glad to be hangered! Struggling to maintain composure as it gets to 61 today. Oh well maybe it will be better tomorrow. You could always move here Stein. Bob K Lovely Las Vegas Do not archive. From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of SteinAir, Inc. Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 5:09 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Glad to be hangered! I'll try to send some that way....I think we got up to 3 yesterday, although today it warmed up nicely to 14...currently sitting at a balmy 9 degrees F. Back down to -11 tonight, but warmer weather comin! Cheers, Stein do not archive -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of McGANN, Ron Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 3:54 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Glad to be hangered! Want to send some cool weather our way?? 125 degs in my hangar and on the apron at the moment. Wanna know how frustrating that is when you are trying to do a first engine start???? cheers, Ron -187, waiting for the temperature to COOOOL!! _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of jim@combsfive.com Sent: Friday, 30 January 2009 1:19 AM Subject: RV10-List: Glad to be hangered! We had some serious Ice and snow over the last few days. I got out to the airport and was really glad I was in a hanger! All aircraft had become tail draggers! Hope none are damaged! Jim Combs N312F - Flying Do Not Archive "Warning: The information contained in this email and any attached files is confidential to BAE Systems Australia. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this email or any attachments is expressly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately. VIRUS: Every care has been taken to ensure this email and its attachments are virus free, however, any loss or damage incurred in using this email is not the sender's responsibility. It is your responsibility to ensure virus checks are completed before installing any data sent in this email to your computer." href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com /Navigator?RV10-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List http://forums.matronics.com http://www.matronics.com/contribution http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List http://forums.matronics.com http://www.matronics.com/contribution


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:22:50 PM PST US
    From: "John Hilger" <ninepapa@bendbroadband.com>
    Subject: Re: Tru Trak (RV-10) roll servo stop plate
    Tim Thanks for mentioning this. I just checked mine and I got two turns on those screws. Another 1/8" or 1/4" would be better. As I understand it, the stop plate is there to prevent any part of the linkage from going "over center". This would cause the servo to lockup when it reverses, Not a Good Idea. Check with Tru Track they might have longer screws. John H ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Lewis" <timrvator@comcast.net> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 12:39 PM Subject: RV10-List: Tru Trak (RV-10) roll servo stop plate > > Tru Trak's RV-10 roll servo installation diagram is at > <http://www.trutrakap.com/documents/RV10RollInstallation.pdf>. > > In the first photo, item "F" is the servo stop plate. That stop plate is > held on by two little 6-32 screws, 1/4" long, which only engage about one > thread (!) into the servo body (due to the short 1/4" length of the > screws and the AN960-10 washer spacer called out in step F). I'm not very > comfortable with this arrangement. Only a single thread engagement (1 > turn of the screw) leaves me feeling there's risk of the screw stripping > and/or backing out and leaving the stop plate not properly attached. I > don't like the picture of the stop plate rattling around where it can jam > the aircraft roll control. > > For those who have installed this system and gotten it flying, do you find > that the stop plate is needed, or does the RV-10's aileron stop system > keep the servo arm from running up to the stops provided by the servo's > stop plate? Have others taken steps to better secure the stop plate? > > Thanks, > > Tim > > -- > Tim Lewis -- HEF (Manassas, VA) > RV-6A N47TD -- 1000 hrs > RV-10 #40059 under construction > > >


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:25:26 PM PST US
    From: Bill DeRouchey <billderou@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: RE: 406 MHZ ELT
    I-not so brilliantly-tested mine to the COSPAS satellite and hence test ed the process from beginning to end. - My remote activation switch was located on a removable section of the Stein panel linking to a harness through a large AMP connector. Somehow when I r emoved the panel it set off my ME406. The buzzer that came with the unit ha s a high pitch that only a dog can detect. After an unknown amount of time I sensed something was amiss and started frantically removing the screws in the tail fairing. Note that my aircraft was inside a metal hanger with the big doors opened not more than one foot. - About halfway through the 30 (or so) screws securing the tail fairing my ce ll phone rang. It was a Sergeant from the Air Force in Florida. I told him the story and all was well. Then I asked what was the overall response time and the process he follows. From onset it was 13 minutes and he had alread y called my Dad and Sara. We said goodbye. I removed another 10 screws and the cell phone rang again. This time it was a lady from Search and Rescue i n Alaska. I went through the story again except she wanted the long alphanu meric string to verify it was really me. Fortunately, I had my aircraft dia ry nearby with the ME406 documented. She said goodbye and warned me that th e Coast Guard would call next. - I relocated the remote switch to a fixed point to the left of my lower leg. Actually, all the emergency switches are located in a row at the same loca tion to keep the panel uncluttered: ELT, alt air, oil winter flap, alt stat ic air. AND - I pasted and sealed an extra ELT Beacon sticker to the side o f my registration placard so I could say the long alphanumeric code without opening up the tail fairing. - Guys, these new 406Mhz units work exceptionally well and there is a good pr ocess behind the alert. The 121.5Mhz units were seldom more than a comfort while you died and never a bargain at $200 (or so). Note that the 121.5 pro cess had a mandatory 8 hour wait for additional verification to filter out false signals. So, if you calculate a blood drip rate at .... - One item of concern with carrying a PLB as your 406Mhz device. As I remembe r the COSPAS packet or Beacon ID indicates-if the alert source is a Perso nal LB, Aviation LB, or Marine LB. The rescue process could be very differe nt if a PLB alert is sent for an aircraft in distress. - I sent an email to the ME406 Product Manager in early 2006 telling him to p rovide a pin for serial GPS data that we could optionally provide else the AmeriKings and Acks would chew his tail. He never answered. Well, we will s ee how the ME406 competes in the future. - Bill DeRouchey N939SB, flying - --- On Sat, 1/31/09, Tim Olson <Tim@myrv10.com> wrote: From: Tim Olson <Tim@myrv10.com> Subject: Re: RV10-List: RE: 406 MHZ ELT Patrick, I'm trying to figure out which side of the argument you're arguing for.... I read the AC43.13 chapter 12, and see nothing really related to 406Mhz ELT's other than normal ELT Checks, and since they also broadcast 121.5, that should make inspecting easy. But it's not a FAR, it's all in the AC. Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying do not archive Patrick Thyssen wrote: > Ok, heres a Hint.. > VHF, AM radio. Read AC43.13.chapter 12 Ask your Faa inspector. I did not read or ask one day on a part135 inspection. > Patrick Thyssen > > --- On *Fri, 1/30/09, Kelly McMullen /<kellym@aviating.com>/* wrote: > > From: Kelly McMullen <kellym@aviating.com> > Subject: Re: RV10-List: RE: 406 MHZ ELT > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Date: Friday, January 30, 2009, 6:48 PM > <kellym@aviating.com> > > Yes, the old method WILL work on all ELTs. Point is there is NO regulatory > requirement to test the ELT on anything but 121.5. All units still broadcast > 121.5, as it is a requirement of the TSO. In fact 91.207 does not > specify a > frequency, so you are free to test its broadcast as you see fit(withi n the 5 min > after hour). > KM > A&P/IA > Steven Roberts wrote: > > > Patrick, > > > The old method won=A2t work on the 406 MHz ELT=A2s. That was the point I > was trying to make. For one thing, 406 MHz is outside the frequency range of VHF > airband receivers. Secondly, the old ELTs are amplitude modulated, th e new ELTs > are frequency modulated. Lastly, the old ELTs are a continuous wave analog tone, > while the new ELT=A2s are a short burst of digital data, very close t o the way > cellphone and wifi transmitters work. The short pulse allows a high power (five > watt) signal from a very small battery. You need a special receiver t o receive > the signal and a digital processor to decode the data. That=A2s what you get for > 3 AMU=A2s. > > > (AMU is the American Monetary Unit or $1,000 US dollars. Also equivalent > to one > AJU, the American Jewelry Unit) J > > > Steve Roberts > > > (still lurking while waiting for a suitable build location) > > > N2700W 1966 Mooney M20E =A1Ms. Obsession=A2 KMOR Morristown, TN > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Patrick Thyssen > > *Sent:* Friday, January 30, 2009 9:44 AM > > *To:* rv10-list@matronics.com > > *Subject:* Re: RV10-List: RE: 406 MHZ ELT > > > Steve, > > > You might want to look up in ac43.13 chapter 12 about checking ELTs. using > a VHF radio. > > > Patrick Thyssen > > > One day I to will fly. > > > > ** > > * * > > > * > > > > > -= --> > > > > > * > > > *


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:01:53 PM PST US
    From: Patrick Thyssen <jump2@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Re: RE: 406 MHZ ELT
    Tim, -Ok here's where I'm coming from. Steve made a blanket statement of using VHF and thats all you do With the old 121.5 elts and As I said, I was not talking about 406 elts, I was concerned about 121.5 elts- which we mostly have in the general aviation. And do not want someone reading this and say all I have to do is use the VHF radio turn it to 121.5 and see if I get a signal.The Vhf radio only lets you test to see if it activates but is not g ood for the radiated signal. As per Far 91.207d4. You can test that as per AC43. And ac 43.13 is acceptable data. (Don't forget to read the notes).Tha t is the only place I know you see testing for sufficient signal radiated f rom its antenna. Except for the manufacturer books which I know nothing of. So go ahead and shoot. Like I said ask your local- FAA. otherwise don't ask and ask for forgiven ess afterward, that's the pilots motto around my airport. Patrick Thyssen Will fly one day. Maybe --- On Sat, 1/31/09, Tim Olson <Tim@myrv10.com> wrote: From: Tim Olson <Tim@myrv10.com> Subject: Re: RV10-List: RE: 406 MHZ ELT Patrick, I'm trying to figure out which side of the argument you're arguing for.... I read the AC43.13 chapter 12, and see nothing really related to 406Mhz ELT's other than normal ELT Checks, and since they also broadcast 121.5, that should make inspecting easy. But it's not a FAR, it's all in the AC. Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying do not archive Patrick Thyssen wrote: > Ok, heres a Hint.. > VHF, AM radio. Read AC43.13.chapter 12 Ask your Faa inspector. I did not read or ask one day on a part135 inspection. > Patrick Thyssen > > --- On *Fri, 1/30/09, Kelly McMullen /<kellym@aviating.com>/* wrote: > > From: Kelly McMullen <kellym@aviating.com> > Subject: Re: RV10-List: RE: 406 MHZ ELT > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Date: Friday, January 30, 2009, 6:48 PM > <kellym@aviating.com> > > Yes, the old method WILL work on all ELTs. Point is there is NO regulatory > requirement to test the ELT on anything but 121.5. All units still broadcast > 121.5, as it is a requirement of the TSO. In fact 91.207 does not > specify a > frequency, so you are free to test its broadcast as you see fit(withi n the 5 min > after hour). > KM > A&P/IA > Steven Roberts wrote: > > > Patrick, > > > The old method won=A2t work on the 406 MHz ELT=A2s. That was the point I > was trying to make. For one thing, 406 MHz is outside the frequency range of VHF > airband receivers. Secondly, the old ELTs are amplitude modulated, th e new ELTs > are frequency modulated. Lastly, the old ELTs are a continuous wave analog tone, > while the new ELT=A2s are a short burst of digital data, very close t o the way > cellphone and wifi transmitters work. The short pulse allows a high power (five > watt) signal from a very small battery. You need a special receiver t o receive > the signal and a digital processor to decode the data. That=A2s what you get for > 3 AMU=A2s. > > > (AMU is the American Monetary Unit or $1,000 US dollars. Also equivalent > to one > AJU, the American Jewelry Unit) J > > > Steve Roberts > > > (still lurking while waiting for a suitable build location) > > > N2700W 1966 Mooney M20E =A1Ms. Obsession=A2 KMOR Morristown, TN > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Patrick Thyssen > > *Sent:* Friday, January 30, 2009 9:44 AM > > *To:* rv10-list@matronics.com > > *Subject:* Re: RV10-List: RE: 406 MHZ ELT > > > Steve, > > > You might want to look up in ac43.13 chapter 12 about checking ELTs. using > a VHF radio. > > > Patrick Thyssen > > > One day I to will fly. > > > > ** > > * * > > > * > > > > > -= --> > > > > > * > > > *


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:43:56 PM PST US
    From: Larry Rosen <N205EN@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Tru Trak (RV-10) roll servo stop plate
    Tim, I cannot answer your question, but I looked at my installation (not yet flying) and I do not have the roll stop installed. If you look at Tim Olson's installation and he also does not have the roll stop <http://www.myrv10.com/N104CD/wing/20041231/RV200412310044.html>, but Deems does <http://www.deemsrv10.com/album/Sec%2020%20Bottom%20Wing%20Skin/slides/DSC02106.html> Also, I do not have the stop installed on the pitch servo, but Tim Olson does <http://www.myrv10.com/N104CD/upgrades/20060816/RV200608160109.html>, but the Tru Trak RV-10 installation photos do not show it. Deems does not have the pitch control stops installed <http://www.deemsrv10.com/album/Wiring/slides/DSC03209.html> Now I am even more confused than usual. I guess a call to Tru Trak on Monday is called for. Larry Rosen #356 Tim Lewis wrote: > > Tru Trak's RV-10 roll servo installation diagram is at > <http://www.trutrakap.com/documents/RV10RollInstallation.pdf>. > > In the first photo, item "F" is the servo stop plate. That stop plate > is held on by two little 6-32 screws, 1/4" long, which only engage > about one thread (!) into the servo body (due to the short 1/4" > length of the screws and the AN960-10 washer spacer called out in step > F). I'm not very comfortable with this arrangement. Only a single > thread engagement (1 turn of the screw) leaves me feeling there's risk > of the screw stripping and/or backing out and leaving the stop plate > not properly attached. I don't like the picture of the stop plate > rattling around where it can jam the aircraft roll control. > > For those who have installed this system and gotten it flying, do you > find that the stop plate is needed, or does the RV-10's aileron stop > system keep the servo arm from running up to the stops provided by the > servo's stop plate? Have others taken steps to better secure the > stop plate? > > Thanks, > > Tim >


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:22:10 PM PST US
    From: Rick Sked <ricksked@embarqmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Mistake on the aft deck


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:07:06 PM PST US
    From: "Doug Gee" <Doug.Gee@firestone-textiles.com>
    Subject: Deburring
    I have just started building the VS and I have a question about deburring technique. I have used the scotchbrite wheel t do most of the outside edges and this works well. I have used the deburring tool with the swivelling blade to do the lightening holes but how do I do the notches around the ribs? I used a needle file but very tedious - is there a better way or d these notches not need to be done? Thanks


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:42:15 PM PST US
    From: Vernon Smith <planesmith@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Van's Whelen/ELT bracket
    Hi Michael=2C Probably a little late=2C but I posted some pictures of the installed mount s on the blog: www.aviationstop.com Vern Smith (#324 finishing) > From: rvbuilder@sausen.net > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Date: Sat=2C 31 Jan 2009 09:38:46 -0600 > Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Van's Whelen/ELT bracket > @sausen.net> > > Thanks guys=2C I figured it was mounted to the J Channel. That's basical ly what I needed as I'm looking for someplace to mount my Mountain High tan k filler. Mine is the one with the gauge otherwise I would have mounted it through the rear bulkhead somewhere. > > Michael > Do not archive > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server @matronics.com] On Behalf Of tsts4 > Sent: Friday=2C January 30=2C 2009 6:58 PM > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Re: Van's Whelen/ELT bracket > > > I have the instructions but no way to post them electronically. I can ei ther type them out here (there's 5 steps) or if you post or PM me a fax num ber I can send them that way. > > It gets installed between the F-1047C-L and F-1047D-L J-stiffeners=2C and between the F-1006 and f-1007 Frames=2C but closer to the F-1006. You sli de it fore and aft to get a good fit. The outside face of the bracket's to p flange goes against the bottom side of the 1047C stiffener=2C while the i nside face of the bracket's bottom flange goes against the bottom side of t he 1047D stiffener. The instructions have a drawing that makes this arrang ement perfectly clear. > > -------- > Todd Stovall > 728TT (reserved) > RV-10 Empacone > _________________________________________________________________ Windows Live=99 Hotmail=AE:=85more than just e-mail. http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_hm_justgotbetter_expl ore_012009




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv10-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV10-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv10-list
  • Browse RV10-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --