RV10-List Digest Archive

Sat 03/07/09


Total Messages Posted: 22



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 03:48 AM - Re: Fuel injection servo attachment - concerned ? (nukeflyboy)
     2. 06:09 AM - Re: Page 9-15 Step 7, Trim cable attachment question (Joe McKervey)
     3. 08:17 AM - Re: New Hartzell Available (RV Builder (Michael Sausen))
     4. 09:09 AM - Re: New Hartzell Available (lessdragprod@aol.com)
     5. 09:11 AM - Re: New Hartzell Available (Bob and Karen Brown)
     6. 09:21 AM - Re: New Hartzell Available (John Cox)
     7. 09:35 AM - Re: New Hartzell Available (John Cox)
     8. 10:20 AM - Re: New Hartzell Available (pascal)
     9. 11:50 AM - Re: New Hartzell Available (John Cox)
    10. 12:35 PM - Re: New Hartzell Available (John Ackerman)
    11. 01:25 PM - Re: New Hartzell Available (ddddsp1@juno.com)
    12. 01:40 PM - Re: New Hartzell Available (Jesse Saint)
    13. 01:40 PM - Re: New Hartzell Available (RV Builder (Michael Sausen))
    14. 02:43 PM - rear window install (Bob-tcw)
    15. 03:04 PM - Re: rear window install (DLIUDVINAITIS@aol.com)
    16. 03:10 PM - Re: New Hartzell Available (Tim Olson)
    17. 03:46 PM - Re: Another Milestone (geoff Combs)
    18. 04:34 PM - Re: Another Milestone (Evan & Tania)
    19. 04:34 PM - Re: New Hartzell Available (John Cox)
    20. 06:22 PM - Re: New Hartzell Available (pascal)
    21. 07:35 PM - Re: Adel Pliers (Bill Schlatterer)
    22. 08:58 PM - Flightline AC system for sale (rvdave)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:48:29 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Fuel injection servo attachment - concerned ?
    From: "nukeflyboy" <flymoore@charter.net>
    AirMike, There are many ways to lock a bolt in place and there is nothing wrong with the tabs that were sent with the kit. They work fine and are a recognized way of safetying a bolt to prevent backing out. So is staking but bent tabs are much easier for homebuilders. Often times it is not practical to safety wire and this is a good substitute. Of course you can only use it once. You can replace it with a drilled head/safety wire combo if you like, but it is not correct to say it is "dangerous". -------- Dave Moore RV-6 flying RV-10 QB - cabin top/fiberglass hell Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=233566#233566


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:09:08 AM PST US
    From: "Joe McKervey" <mckervey@charter.net>
    Subject: Re: Page 9-15 Step 7, Trim cable attachment question
    John, I drilled my aftermarket trim cable attachments with a 6-32 tap drill ,counter sunk the bracket, dimpled the cover and attached them with stainless steel 6-32 screws. Much easier to adjust. Joe ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Trollinger" <john@trollingers.com> Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 4:27 PM Subject: RV10-List: Page 9-15 Step 7, Trim cable attachment question > > So I bought the after market trim cable attachment brackets from > Cleavland tools and am ready to assemble. The vans instructions say > to use a LP4-3 to put the pieces together. The aftermarket bracket is > pretty thick and I was thinking about dimpling the WD-415 and then > countersinking the bracket to accept the dimple and then using an > AN-426 and back rivet it together. > > Just wanted to get some group feedback on my plan and see what others > using these brackets have done. > > thanks, > > John Trollinger > > Builder 40923 > > >


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:17:01 AM PST US
    From: "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)" <rvbuilder@sausen.net>
    Subject: New Hartzell Available
    I have to disagree, my new 3 blade MT was under 9k with 14" spinner, asse mbly, and shipping. You don't pay extra for a 14" spinner with MT. I did get a bit of a price break because it was one that someone had ordered and then backed out on but this was only a couple months ago. Michael From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@m atronics.com] On Behalf Of Robin Marks Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 8:10 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available Just a point of clarification... The panel image I posted was of Deems' lay out as Vern thought Deems was using the Avidyne system. I wanted to answer for Deems as he is otherwise occupied. (I went with the G900X/Dynon Back Up ) As far as props go... $15,000 is in the ball park when compared with the ot her 3 blades out there. Throw in a custom paint scheme. Cough, cough (Deems ) and my guess is that all 3 blades are running $15 ish. Unfortunately with all the equipment out there we still have no, zero, zilch, nada side by si de comparisons. So how is one to know what is the fastest or best option? M y choice was $6.5k, two blades and easy cowl removal. Heck most of my frien ds don't have an airplane so ego still intact. I have a feeling that when a ll is said & done the BA Hartzell may be the fastest of them all in cruise. Of note those thinking of the James cowl will need to buy a $1,100+ 14" spi nner. My Barrett / Forsling / James Fire Breather "Chunky Monkey" is almost dress ed (painted)... Robin Do Not Archive


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:09:34 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: New Hartzell Available
    From: lessdragprod@aol.com
    Just a point of clearification here.=C2- Michael's 3 blade MT propeller wa s a new propeller available for comparison=C2-flight testing on=C2-a fly ing RV-10 with a 2 blade hartzell.=C2- With no takers in over a year, I so ld the propeller to Michael. I have new RV-10 3 blade MT propellers available for $9,890 delivered assemb led to your closest international airport.=C2- 13" or 14" spinner included . Standard colors are Red, White, Grey, Black and Yellow for the blades, blade tips and spinner. Grey with White tips is recommended for IFR aircraft. Black with Yellow tips was the old CAA required blade colors. As a special offer, White blades with Red, White and Blue tips is available. A Hi-Glo spinner (looks like polished aluminum) is available for an extra $4 50. Sorry if this offens the SPAM sensitive.=C2- Just real prices. Please contact me off line, or directly at the phone numbers below, if you d esire additional information. Jim Ayers jim@lessdrag.com Less Drag products, Inc - Located in California (805) 795-5377 Custom Aircraft Propeller - Located in Florida (321) 441-3544 -----Original Message----- From: RV Builder (Michael Sausen) <rvbuilder@sausen.net> Sent: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 8:14 am Subject: RE: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available =C2- I have to disagree, my new 3 blade MT was under 9k with 14=9D s pinner, assembly, and shipping.=C2- You don=99t pay extra for a 14 =9D spinner with MT.=C2- I did get a bit of a price break because it was one that someone had ordered and then backed out on but this was onl y a couple months ago. =C2- Michael =C2- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@ma tronics.com] On Behalf Of Robin Marks Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 8:10 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available =C2- Just a point of clarification The panel image I posted was of Deems =99 layout as Vern thought Deems was using the Avidyne system. I wante d to answer for Deems as he is otherwise occupied. (I went with the G900X/Dy non Back Up) As far as props go $15,000 is in the ball park when compared with t he other 3 blades out there. Throw in a custom paint scheme. Cough, cough (D eems) and my guess is that all 3 blades are running $15 ish. Unfortunately w ith all the equipment out there we still have no, zero, zilch, nada side by side comparisons. So how is one to know what is the fastest or best option? My choice was $6.5k, two blades and easy cowl removal. Heck most of my frien ds don=99t have an airplane so ego still intact. I have a feeling that when all is said & done the BA Hartzell may be the fastest of them all in c ruise. Of note those thinking of the James cowl will need to buy a $1,100+ 14 =9D spinner. My Barrett / Forsling / James Fire Breather "Chunky Monkey" is almost dresse d (painted) =C2- Robin Do Not Archive =C2-=C2- =C2- D======================== =================== -= - The RV10-List Email Forum - -= Use the Matronics List Features Navigator to browse -= the many List utilities such as List Un/Subscription, -= Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, -= Photoshare, and much much more: - -= --> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List - -======================== -= - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - -= Same great content also available via the Web Forums! - -= --> http://forums.matronics.com - -======================== -= - List Contribution Web Site - -= Thank you for your generous support! -= -Matt Dralle, List Admin. -= --> http://www.matronics.com/contribution -========================


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:11:44 AM PST US
    From: "Bob and Karen Brown" <bkbrown@minetfiber.com>
    Subject: New Hartzell Available
    I don't believe you pay extra for the 14" spinner from Aerocomposites either. From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of RV Builder (Michael Sausen) Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 8:15 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available I have to disagree, my new 3 blade MT was under 9k with 14" spinner, assembly, and shipping. You don't pay extra for a 14" spinner with MT. I did get a bit of a price break because it was one that someone had ordered and then backed out on but this was only a couple months ago. Michael From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Robin Marks Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 8:10 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available Just a point of clarification. The panel image I posted was of Deems' layout as Vern thought Deems was using the Avidyne system. I wanted to answer for Deems as he is otherwise occupied. (I went with the G900X/Dynon Back Up) As far as props go. $15,000 is in the ball park when compared with the other 3 blades out there. Throw in a custom paint scheme. Cough, cough (Deems) and my guess is that all 3 blades are running $15 ish. Unfortunately with all the equipment out there we still have no, zero, zilch, nada side by side comparisons. So how is one to know what is the fastest or best option? My choice was $6.5k, two blades and easy cowl removal. Heck most of my friends don't have an airplane so ego still intact. I have a feeling that when all is said & done the BA Hartzell may be the fastest of them all in cruise. Of note those thinking of the James cowl will need to buy a $1,100+ 14" spinner. My Barrett / Forsling / James Fire Breather "Chunky Monkey" is almost dressed (painted). Robin Do Not Archive


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:21:39 AM PST US
    Subject: New Hartzell Available
    From: "John Cox" <johnwcox@pacificnw.com>
    Can we agree the Hartzell two blade assembly is lighter and faster in cruise? The 3 blade is prettier to some builders. The composite blades dampens combustion impulses better than aluminum blades. Some aluminum blades have rpm restrictions. Some 3 blades can climb quicker to altitude than two. Some builders report quieter cockpits and less harmonic vibrations. Some builders choose to spend more on selected features than more fiscally restricted or conservative types. Some of the builders helped raise the bar and improve the finished product through Add-ons. The G900 is one of those, the OP Tech was one, the VP200 is one, The Grimstad pedal retro is a pair, the 3 Blade composite is one such assembly, TCW products are a whole line and the aftermarket composite components can lead to improvements in speed, appearance and builder pride. Some beautiful adds cost more, add weight and can raise the bar all in one fell swoop. Congrats "Chunky Monkey". Thanks guys for making the choices so diverse and this group so tolerant of the progressive builders and vital kit - The VANS RV-10. John From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of RV Builder (Michael Sausen) Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 8:15 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available I have to disagree, my new 3 blade MT was under 9k with 14" spinner, assembly, and shipping. You don't pay extra for a 14" spinner with MT. I did get a bit of a price break because it was one that someone had ordered and then backed out on but this was only a couple months ago. Michael From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Robin Marks Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 8:10 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available Just a point of clarification... The panel image I posted was of Deems' layout as Vern thought Deems was using the Avidyne system. I wanted to answer for Deems as he is otherwise occupied. (I went with the G900X/Dynon Back Up) As far as props go... $15,000 is in the ball park when compared with the other 3 blades out there. Throw in a custom paint scheme. Cough, cough (Deems) and my guess is that all 3 blades are running $15 ish. Unfortunately with all the equipment out there we still have no, zero, zilch, nada side by side comparisons. So how is one to know what is the fastest or best option? My choice was $6.5k, two blades and easy cowl removal. Heck most of my friends don't have an airplane so ego still intact. I have a feeling that when all is said & done the BA Hartzell may be the fastest of them all in cruise. Of note those thinking of the James cowl will need to buy a $1,100+ 14" spinner. My Barrett / Forsling / James Fire Breather "Chunky Monkey" is almost dressed (painted)... Robin Do Not Archive


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:35:42 AM PST US
    Subject: New Hartzell Available
    From: "John Cox" <johnwcox@pacificnw.com>
    SmltLCB5b3UgY291bGQgZG8gYSBiaWcgZmF2b3IgdG8gdGhlIGV4cGVyaW1lbnRhbCBtYXJrZXQg YnkgbG9iYnlpbmcgR2VydCB0byBhbGxvdyBjdXN0b20gYmxhZGUgcGFpbnQgb24gdGhlIE1Ucy4g IE5vdGhpbmcgYWdhaW5zdCBXaGl0ZSBCbGFkZXMsIEJsYWNrIEJsYWRlcywgR3JleSBibGFkZXPi gKYgYnV0IGJveSBkbyB0aGUgQW1lcmljYW4gUHJvcGVsbGVyIHBhaW50IGpvYnMgZ2V0IG15IGp1 aWNlcyBmbG93aW5nLiAgU29tZSBSVi0xMHMganVzdCBsb29rIGZhc3Qgc3RhbmRpbmcgb24gdGhl IHJhbXAgbmV4dCB0byBhIEctSVYuDQoNCiANCg0KSSBhbSBzdXJlIEFlcm9jb21wIGJsYWRlcyB3 b3VsZCBzZWxsIGFzIG1hbnkgaW4gc3RvY2sgInJlc3RyaWN0ZWQiIGJsYW5kIHBhaW50IGNvbG9y cyBidXQgdGhvc2UgZmluaXNoZWQgYmxhZGVzIGFyZSBwcmV0dGllciBpbiBteSBleWVzIGFuZCBp bXBhY3QgbWFya2V0aW5nPSBTYWxlcy4gIEVub3VnaCBzbyB0aGF0IG1vbmV5IG11c3QgYmUgYnVk Z2V0ZWQgYSBsaXR0bGUgdGlnaHRlciB0aGFuIEkgaGFkIHBsYW5uZWQgb3JpZ2luYWxseS4NCg0K IA0KDQpBbmQgaXNuJ3QgaXQgdHJhZ2ljIHRoYXQgbm90IG9uZSAiSGVhZCB0byBIZWFkIiBoYXMg YmVlbiBkb25lIGluIGFsbCB0aGlzIHRpbWUuICAxOTAgZmluaXNoZWQsIGZseWluZyBSVi0xMHMs IG5lYXJseSAxLDAwMCBraXRzIHNvbGQgYW5kIE5vdCBIYXJ0emVsbCwgTm9yIE1UIG5vciBBZXJv Y29tcCB3aWxsIHRha2UgdGhlIGdhdW50bGV0LiAgUm9iLCBJIHVuZGVyc3RhbmQgeW91ciB0aW1l bGluZSBwcmlvcml0aWVzIG9uIGdyZWF0IG5ldyBBRlMgcHJvZHVjdHMgaGF2ZSBkaXN0cmFjdGVk IHlvdSwgYnV0IG1hbnkgYXJlIGxlYW5pbmcgaW50byB0aGUgcHJldmFpbGluZyB3aW5kcyB0byBo ZWFyIG1vcmUgb24gRmllbGQgVGVzdHMgb2YgdGhlIEhhcnR6ZWxsIEFTQy1JSS4NCg0KIA0KDQpK b2huDQoNCiANCg0KRnJvbTogb3duZXItcnYxMC1saXN0LXNlcnZlckBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tIFtt YWlsdG86b3duZXItcnYxMC1saXN0LXNlcnZlckBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tXSBPbiBCZWhhbGYgT2Yg bGVzc2RyYWdwcm9kQGFvbC5jb20NClNlbnQ6IFNhdHVyZGF5LCBNYXJjaCAwNywgMjAwOSA5OjA4 IEFNDQpUbzogcnYxMC1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20NClN1YmplY3Q6IFJlOiBSVjEwLUxpc3Q6 IE5ldyBIYXJ0emVsbCBBdmFpbGFibGUNCg0KIA0KDQpKdXN0IGEgcG9pbnQgb2YgY2xlYXJpZmlj YXRpb24gaGVyZS4gIE1pY2hhZWwncyAzIGJsYWRlIE1UIHByb3BlbGxlciB3YXMgYSBuZXcgcHJv cGVsbGVyIGF2YWlsYWJsZSBmb3IgY29tcGFyaXNvbiBmbGlnaHQgdGVzdGluZyBvbiBhIGZseWlu ZyBSVi0xMCB3aXRoIGEgMiBibGFkZSBoYXJ0emVsbC4gIFdpdGggbm8gdGFrZXJzIGluIG92ZXIg YSB5ZWFyLCBJIHNvbGQgdGhlIHByb3BlbGxlciB0byBNaWNoYWVsLg0KDQpJIGhhdmUgbmV3IFJW LTEwIDMgYmxhZGUgTVQgcHJvcGVsbGVycyBhdmFpbGFibGUgZm9yICQ5LDg5MCBkZWxpdmVyZWQg YXNzZW1ibGVkIHRvIHlvdXIgY2xvc2VzdCBpbnRlcm5hdGlvbmFsIGFpcnBvcnQuICAxMyIgb3Ig MTQiIHNwaW5uZXIgaW5jbHVkZWQuDQoNClN0YW5kYXJkIGNvbG9ycyBhcmUgUmVkLCBXaGl0ZSwg R3JleSwgQmxhY2sgYW5kIFllbGxvdyBmb3IgdGhlIGJsYWRlcywgYmxhZGUgdGlwcyBhbmQgc3Bp bm5lci4NCkdyZXkgd2l0aCBXaGl0ZSB0aXBzIGlzIHJlY29tbWVuZGVkIGZvciBJRlIgYWlyY3Jh ZnQuDQpCbGFjayB3aXRoIFllbGxvdyB0aXBzIHdhcyB0aGUgb2xkIENBQSByZXF1aXJlZCBibGFk ZSBjb2xvcnMuDQpBcyBhIHNwZWNpYWwgb2ZmZXIsIFdoaXRlIGJsYWRlcyB3aXRoIFJlZCwgV2hp dGUgYW5kIEJsdWUgdGlwcyBpcyBhdmFpbGFibGUuDQoNCkEgSGktR2xvIHNwaW5uZXIgKGxvb2tz IGxpa2UgcG9saXNoZWQgYWx1bWludW0pIGlzIGF2YWlsYWJsZSBmb3IgYW4gZXh0cmEgJDQ1MC4N Cg0KU29ycnkgaWYgdGhpcyBvZmZlbnMgdGhlIFNQQU0gc2Vuc2l0aXZlLiAgSnVzdCByZWFsIHBy aWNlcy4NCg0KUGxlYXNlIGNvbnRhY3QgbWUgb2ZmIGxpbmUsIG9yIGRpcmVjdGx5IGF0IHRoZSBw aG9uZSBudW1iZXJzIGJlbG93LCBpZiB5b3UgZGVzaXJlIGFkZGl0aW9uYWwgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24u DQoNCkppbSBBeWVycw0KamltQGxlc3NkcmFnLmNvbQ0KTGVzcyBEcmFnIHByb2R1Y3RzLCBJbmMg LSBMb2NhdGVkIGluIENhbGlmb3JuaWEgKDgwNSkgNzk1LTUzNzcNCkN1c3RvbSBBaXJjcmFmdCBQ cm9wZWxsZXIgLSBMb2NhdGVkIGluIEZsb3JpZGEgKDMyMSkgNDQxLTM1NDQNCg0KLS0tLS1Pcmln aW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCkZyb206IFJWIEJ1aWxkZXIgKE1pY2hhZWwgU2F1c2VuKSA8cnZi dWlsZGVyQHNhdXNlbi5uZXQ+DQpUbzogcnYxMC1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20gPHJ2MTAtbGlz dEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tPg0KU2VudDogU2F0LCA3IE1hciAyMDA5IDg6MTQgYW0NClN1YmplY3Q6 IFJFOiBSVjEwLUxpc3Q6IE5ldyBIYXJ0emVsbCBBdmFpbGFibGUNCg0KICBJIGhhdmUgdG8gZGlz YWdyZWUsIG15IG5ldyAzIGJsYWRlIE1UIHdhcyB1bmRlciA5ayB3aXRoIDE04oCdIHNwaW5uZXIs IGFzc2VtYmx5LCBhbmQgc2hpcHBpbmcuICBZb3UgZG9u4oCZdCBwYXkgZXh0cmEgZm9yIGEgMTTi gJ0gc3Bpbm5lciB3aXRoIE1ULiAgSSBkaWQgZ2V0IGEgYml0IG9mIGEgcHJpY2UgYnJlYWsgYmVj YXVzZSBpdCB3YXMgb25lIHRoYXQgc29tZW9uZSBoYWQgb3JkZXJlZCBhbmQgdGhlbiBiYWNrZWQg b3V0IG9uIGJ1dCB0aGlzIHdhcyBvbmx5IGEgY291cGxlIG1vbnRocyBhZ28uDQoNCiANCg0KTWlj aGFlbA0KDQogDQoNCg=


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:20:31 AM PST US
    From: "pascal" <pascal@rv10builder.net>
    Subject: Re: New Hartzell Available
    This has come up before. Vic did a test next to the Van's plane (attached) and I took away that the higher HP 3 blade still was slower than the Van's 2 blade, Rob did a preliminary, if I recall, and it too was slower than a 2 blade, Hartzell has told me outright that the 2 blade is faster than the composite three blade. Three is more "sexy" but when it comes to performance at this point the 2 blade is the best value for the dollar. Pascal From: John Cox Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 9:32 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available Jim, you could do a big favor to the experimental market by lobbying Gert to allow custom blade paint on the MTs. Nothing against White Blades, Black Blades, Grey blades but boy do the American Propeller paint jobs get my juices flowing. Some RV-10s just look fast standing on the ramp next to a G-IV. I am sure Aerocomp blades would sell as many in stock "restricted" bland paint colors but those finished blades are prettier in my eyes and impact marketing= Sales. Enough so that money must be budgeted a little tighter than I had planned originally. And isn't it tragic that not one "Head to Head" has been done in all this time. 190 finished, flying RV-10s, nearly 1,000 kits sold and Not Hartzell, Nor MT nor Aerocomp will take the gauntlet. Rob, I understand your timeline priorities on great new AFS products have distracted you, but many are leaning into the prevailing winds to hear more on Field Tests of the Hartzell ASC-II. John From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of lessdragprod@aol.com Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 9:08 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available Just a point of clearification here. Michael's 3 blade MT propeller was a new propeller available for comparison flight testing on a flying RV-10 with a 2 blade hartzell. With no takers in over a year, I sold the propeller to Michael. I have new RV-10 3 blade MT propellers available for $9,890 delivered assembled to your closest international airport. 13" or 14" spinner included. Standard colors are Red, White, Grey, Black and Yellow for the blades, blade tips and spinner. Grey with White tips is recommended for IFR aircraft. Black with Yellow tips was the old CAA required blade colors. As a special offer, White blades with Red, White and Blue tips is available. A Hi-Glo spinner (looks like polished aluminum) is available for an extra $450. Sorry if this offens the SPAM sensitive. Just real prices. Please contact me off line, or directly at the phone numbers below, if you desire additional information. Jim Ayers jim@lessdrag.com Less Drag products, Inc - Located in California (805) 795-5377 Custom Aircraft Propeller - Located in Florida (321) 441-3544 -----Original Message----- From: RV Builder (Michael Sausen) <rvbuilder@sausen.net> Sent: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 8:14 am Subject: RE: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available I have to disagree, my new 3 blade MT was under 9k with 14=9D spinner, assembly, and shipping. You don=99t pay extra for a 14=9D spinner with MT. I did get a bit of a price break because it was one that someone had ordered and then backed out on but this was only a couple months ago. Michael =EF=BD=EF=BD~=EF=BD=EF=BD,=03g=EF=BD=EF=BD


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:50:04 AM PST US
    Subject: New Hartzell Available
    From: "John Cox" <johnwcox@pacificnw.com>
    Q2FsbCBtZSBzdHViYm9ybiwgYnV0IEkgZGlkIG5vdCBhY2NlcHQgdGhlIHJlZmVyZW5jZWQgdGVz dCBhcyB2YWxpZCB0aGVuIG9yIG5vdy4gIFdpbGwgc3RpbGwgbHVzdCBhZnRlciBhIGxvbmcgeC1j bnRyeSB3aXRoIHNpbWlsYXIgZW5naW5lZCBSVi0xMHMgcnVubmluZyBhIEhhcnR6ZWxsIDIgYmxh ZGUgYWx1bWludW0gZWdnIGJlYXRlciwgYSBIYXJ0emVsbCAzIGJsYWRlIENvbXBvc2l0ZSwgYW4g TVQgYW5kIGFuIEFlcm9jb21wIG9uIGFuIGV4dGVuZGVkIHRyaXAuICBUaW1lIHRvIGNsaW1iLCBM T1Agb3BzLCBDcnVpc2UgZnVlbCBmbG93IGFuZCBjb21mb3J0IGNvdWxkIGFsbCBiZSBmYWN0b3Jl ZCB3aXRoIHRlYW1zIHN3aXRjaGluZyBwb25pZXMgb24gdmFyaW91cyBsZWdzIHRvIHZhbGlkYXRl IHBhcm9jaGlhbCBiaWFzLg0KDQogDQoNCldlIGhhdmUgdGhlIHRlY2hub2xvZ3ksIEkgd2lsbCBh d2FpdCBhIHZhbGlkIGNvbXBhcmlzb24uICBUaGUgcXVlcnkgY29tZXMgdXAgYmVjYXVzZSBKaW0g aGFzIG5vdCBhY2tub3dsZWRnZSB0aGUgcmVzdWx0cyBvZiBhIHRlc3Qgd2l0aCBoaXMgTVQgYW5k IEkga25vdyBvZiBubyB1bmJpYXNlZCB0ZXN0IHlldCB3aXRoIGFsbCBmb3VyIGZsYXZvcnMuDQoN CiANCg0KSGFyZCBIZWFkZWQgaW4gQXVyb3JhDQoNCiANCg0KRnJvbTogb3duZXItcnYxMC1saXN0 LXNlcnZlckBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tIFttYWlsdG86b3duZXItcnYxMC1saXN0LXNlcnZlckBtYXRy b25pY3MuY29tXSBPbiBCZWhhbGYgT2YgcGFzY2FsDQpTZW50OiBTYXR1cmRheSwgTWFyY2ggMDcs IDIwMDkgOTo1NyBBTQ0KVG86IHJ2MTAtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTog UlYxMC1MaXN0OiBOZXcgSGFydHplbGwgQXZhaWxhYmxlDQoNCiANCg0KVGhpcyBoYXMgY29tZSB1 cCBiZWZvcmUuIFZpYyBkaWQgYSB0ZXN0IG5leHQgdG8gdGhlIFZhbidzIHBsYW5lIChhdHRhY2hl ZCkgYW5kIEkgdG9vayBhd2F5IHRoYXQgdGhlIGhpZ2hlciBIUCAzIGJsYWRlIHN0aWxsIHdhcyBz bG93ZXIgdGhhbiB0aGUgVmFuJ3MgMiBibGFkZSwgUm9iIGRpZCBhIHByZWxpbWluYXJ5LCBpZiBJ IHJlY2FsbCwgYW5kIGl0IHRvbyB3YXMgc2xvd2VyIHRoYW4gYSAyIGJsYWRlLCBIYXJ0emVsbCBo YXMgdG9sZCBtZSBvdXRyaWdodCB0aGF0IHRoZSAyIGJsYWRlIGlzIGZhc3RlciB0aGFuIHRoZSBj b21wb3NpdGUgdGhyZWUgYmxhZGUuDQoNClRocmVlIGlzIG1vcmUgInNleHkiIGJ1dCB3aGVuIGl0 IGNvbWVzIHRvIHBlcmZvcm1hbmNlIGF0IHRoaXMgcG9pbnQgdGhlIDIgYmxhZGUgaXMgdGhlIGJl c3QgdmFsdWUgZm9yIHRoZSBkb2xsYXIuDQoNClBhc2NhbA0KDQogDQoNCkZyb206IEpvaG4gQ294 IDxtYWlsdG86am9obndjb3hAcGFjaWZpY253LmNvbT4gIA0KDQpTZW50OiBTYXR1cmRheSwgTWFy Y2ggMDcsIDIwMDkgOTozMiBBTQ0KDQpUbzogcnYxMC1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20gDQoNClN1 YmplY3Q6IFJFOiBSVjEwLUxpc3Q6IE5ldyBIYXJ0emVsbCBBdmFpbGFibGUNCg0KIA0KDQpKaW0s IHlvdSBjb3VsZCBkbyBhIGJpZyBmYXZvciB0byB0aGUgZXhwZXJpbWVudGFsIG1hcmtldCBieSBs b2JieWluZyBHZXJ0IHRvIGFsbG93IGN1c3RvbSBibGFkZSBwYWludCBvbiB0aGUgTVRzLiAgTm90 aGluZyBhZ2FpbnN0IFdoaXRlIEJsYWRlcywgQmxhY2sgQmxhZGVzLCBHcmV5IGJsYWRlc+KApiBi dXQgYm95IGRvIHRoZSBBbWVyaWNhbiBQcm9wZWxsZXIgcGFpbnQgam9icyBnZXQgbXkganVpY2Vz IGZsb3dpbmcuICBTb21lIFJWLTEwcyBqdXN0IGxvb2sgZmFzdCBzdGFuZGluZyBvbiB0aGUgcmFt cCBuZXh0IHRvIGEgRy1JVi4NCg0KIA0KDQpJIGFtIHN1cmUgQWVyb2NvbXAgYmxhZGVzIHdvdWxk IHNlbGwgYXMgbWFueSBpbiBzdG9jayAicmVzdHJpY3RlZCIgYmxhbmQgcGFpbnQgY29sb3JzIGJ1 dCB0aG9zZSBmaW5pc2hlZCBibGFkZXMgYXJlIHByZXR0aWVyIGluIG15IGV5ZXMgYW5kIGltcGFj dCBtYXJrZXRpbmc9IFNhbGVzLiAgRW5vdWdoIHNvIHRoYXQgbW9uZXkgbXVzdCBiZSBidWRnZXRl ZCBhIGxpdHRsZSB0aWdodGVyIHRoYW4gSSBoYWQgcGxhbm5lZCBvcmlnaW5hbGx5Lg0KDQogDQoN CkFuZCBpc24ndCBpdCB0cmFnaWMgdGhhdCBub3Qgb25lICJIZWFkIHRvIEhlYWQiIGhhcyBiZWVu IGRvbmUgaW4gYWxsIHRoaXMgdGltZS4gIDE5MCBmaW5pc2hlZCwgZmx5aW5nIFJWLTEwcywgbmVh cmx5IDEsMDAwIGtpdHMgc29sZCBhbmQgTm90IEhhcnR6ZWxsLCBOb3IgTVQgbm9yIEFlcm9jb21w IHdpbGwgdGFrZSB0aGUgZ2F1bnRsZXQuICBSb2IsIEkgdW5kZXJzdGFuZCB5b3VyIHRpbWVsaW5l IHByaW9yaXRpZXMgb24gZ3JlYXQgbmV3IEFGUyBwcm9kdWN0cyBoYXZlIGRpc3RyYWN0ZWQgeW91 LCBidXQgbWFueSBhcmUgbGVhbmluZyBpbnRvIHRoZSBwcmV2YWlsaW5nIHdpbmRzIHRvIGhlYXIg bW9yZSBvbiBGaWVsZCBUZXN0cyBvZiB0aGUgSGFydHplbGwgQVNDLUlJLg0KDQogDQoNCkpvaG4N Cg0KIA0KDQpGcm9tOiBvd25lci1ydjEwLWxpc3Qtc2VydmVyQG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20gW21haWx0 bzpvd25lci1ydjEwLWxpc3Qtc2VydmVyQG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb21dIE9uIEJlaGFsZiBPZiBsZXNz ZHJhZ3Byb2RAYW9sLmNvbQ0KU2VudDogU2F0dXJkYXksIE1hcmNoIDA3LCAyMDA5IDk6MDggQU0N ClRvOiBydjEwLWxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbQ0KU3ViamVjdDogUmU6IFJWMTAtTGlzdDogTmV3 IEhhcnR6ZWxsIEF2YWlsYWJsZQ0KDQogDQoNCkp1c3QgYSBwb2ludCBvZiBjbGVhcmlmaWNhdGlv biBoZXJlLiAgTWljaGFlbCdzIDMgYmxhZGUgTVQgcHJvcGVsbGVyIHdhcyBhIG5ldyBwcm9wZWxs ZXIgYXZhaWxhYmxlIGZvciBjb21wYXJpc29uIGZsaWdodCB0ZXN0aW5nIG9uIGEgZmx5aW5nIFJW LTEwIHdpdGggYSAyIGJsYWRlIGhhcnR6ZWxsLiAgV2l0aCBubyB0YWtlcnMgaW4gb3ZlciBhIHll YXIsIEkgc29sZCB0aGUgcHJvcGVsbGVyIHRvIE1pY2hhZWwuDQoNCkkgaGF2ZSBuZXcgUlYtMTAg MyBibGFkZSBNVCBwcm9wZWxsZXJzIGF2YWlsYWJsZSBmb3IgJDksODkwIGRlbGl2ZXJlZCBhc3Nl bWJsZWQgdG8geW91ciBjbG9zZXN0IGludGVybmF0aW9uYWwgYWlycG9ydC4gIDEzIiBvciAxNCIg c3Bpbm5lciBpbmNsdWRlZC4NCg0KU3RhbmRhcmQgY29sb3JzIGFyZSBSZWQsIFdoaXRlLCBHcmV5 LCBCbGFjayBhbmQgWWVsbG93IGZvciB0aGUgYmxhZGVzLCBibGFkZSB0aXBzIGFuZCBzcGlubmVy Lg0KR3JleSB3aXRoIFdoaXRlIHRpcHMgaXMgcmVjb21tZW5kZWQgZm9yIElGUiBhaXJjcmFmdC4N CkJsYWNrIHdpdGggWWVsbG93IHRpcHMgd2FzIHRoZSBvbGQgQ0FBIHJlcXVpcmVkIGJsYWRlIGNv bG9ycy4NCkFzIGEgc3BlY2lhbCBvZmZlciwgV2hpdGUgYmxhZGVzIHdpdGggUmVkLCBXaGl0ZSBh bmQgQmx1ZSB0aXBzIGlzIGF2YWlsYWJsZS4NCg0KQSBIaS1HbG8gc3Bpbm5lciAobG9va3MgbGlr ZSBwb2xpc2hlZCBhbHVtaW51bSkgaXMgYXZhaWxhYmxlIGZvciBhbiBleHRyYSAkNDUwLg0KDQpT b3JyeSBpZiB0aGlzIG9mZmVucyB0aGUgU1BBTSBzZW5zaXRpdmUuICBKdXN0IHJlYWwgcHJpY2Vz Lg0KDQpQbGVhc2UgY29udGFjdCBtZSBvZmYgbGluZSwgb3IgZGlyZWN0bHkgYXQgdGhlIHBob25l IG51bWJlcnMgYmVsb3csIGlmIHlvdSBkZXNpcmUgYWRkaXRpb25hbCBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbi4NCg0K SmltIEF5ZXJzDQpqaW1AbGVzc2RyYWcuY29tDQpMZXNzIERyYWcgcHJvZHVjdHMsIEluYyAtIExv Y2F0ZWQgaW4gQ2FsaWZvcm5pYSAoODA1KSA3OTUtNTM3Nw0KQ3VzdG9tIEFpcmNyYWZ0IFByb3Bl bGxlciAtIExvY2F0ZWQgaW4gRmxvcmlkYSAoMzIxKSA0NDEtMzU0NA0KDQotLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFs IE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQ0KRnJvbTogUlYgQnVpbGRlciAoTWljaGFlbCBTYXVzZW4pIDxydmJ1aWxk ZXJAc2F1c2VuLm5ldD4NClRvOiBydjEwLWxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbSA8cnYxMC1saXN0QG1h dHJvbmljcy5jb20+DQpTZW50OiBTYXQsIDcgTWFyIDIwMDkgODoxNCBhbQ0KU3ViamVjdDogUkU6 IFJWMTAtTGlzdDogTmV3IEhhcnR6ZWxsIEF2YWlsYWJsZQ0KDQogIEkgaGF2ZSB0byBkaXNhZ3Jl ZSwgbXkgbmV3IDMgYmxhZGUgTVQgd2FzIHVuZGVyIDlrIHdpdGggMTTigJ0gc3Bpbm5lciwgYXNz ZW1ibHksIGFuZCBzaGlwcGluZy4gIFlvdSBkb27igJl0IHBheSBleHRyYSBmb3IgYSAxNOKAnSBz cGlubmVyIHdpdGggTVQuICBJIGRpZCBnZXQgYSBiaXQgb2YgYSBwcmljZSBicmVhayBiZWNhdXNl IGl0IHdhcyBvbmUgdGhhdCBzb21lb25lIGhhZCBvcmRlcmVkIGFuZCB0aGVuIGJhY2tlZCBvdXQg b24gYnV0IHRoaXMgd2FzIG9ubHkgYSBjb3VwbGUgbW9udGhzIGFnby4NCg0KIA0KDQpNaWNoYWVs DQoNCiANCg0K77+977+9fu+/ve+/vSwgDQpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f Xw0KDQpn77+977+9DQoNCg=


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:35:08 PM PST US
    From: John Ackerman <johnag5b@cableone.net>
    Subject: Re: New Hartzell Available
    No question in my mind - the two blade blended airfoil props generally seem to be faster, at least in the comparisons that have been posted here, and that's what I'd expect. Faster is not, however, the same thing as higher performance - top speed is only one characteristic that counts. For many of us, takeoff and climb are more important than top speed. So is smoothness. It's also not clear that cruise efficiency differs, or even which way it differs. Finally, the thing that sold me on the Aerocomposites 3-blade was the engineering and fabrication quality of blades, spinner, and hub. No question about the huge price difference, though. In July of 2008. the Aerocomposites cost $14.2K, the spinner was $1.05K, and the paint price depended on what kind of scheme you wanted. Clearly,I thought the quality was worth a huge amount of money, and I'm not alone. Had the Hartzell been available at the time we bought, it might have at least been cause for much head scratching - maybe even a coin flip. We shall see. Do not archive. John Ackerman On Mar 7, 2009, at 10:57 AM, pascal wrote: > This has come up before. Vic did a test next to the Van's plane > (attached) and I took away that the higher HP 3 blade still was > slower than the Van's 2 blade, Rob did a preliminary, if I recall, > and it too was slower than a 2 blade, Hartzell has told me outright > that the 2 blade is faster than the composite three blade. > Three is more "sexy" but when it comes to performance at this point > the 2 blade is the best value for the dollar. > Pascal > > From: John Cox > Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 9:32 AM > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Subject: RE: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available > > Jim, you could do a big favor to the experimental market by lobbying > Gert to allow custom blade paint on the MTs. Nothing against White > Blades, Black Blades, Grey blades but boy do the American > Propeller paint jobs get my juices flowing. Some RV-10s just look > fast standing on the ramp next to a G-IV. > > I am sure Aerocomp blades would sell as many in stock "restricted" > bland paint colors but those finished blades are prettier in my eyes > and impact marketing= Sales. Enough so that money must be budgeted > a little tighter than I had planned originally. > > And isn't it tragic that not one "Head to Head" has been done in all > this time. 190 finished, flying RV-10s, nearly 1,000 kits sold and > Not Hartzell, Nor MT nor Aerocomp will take the gauntlet. Rob, I > understand your timeline priorities on great new AFS products have > distracted you, but many are leaning into the prevailing winds to > hear more on Field Tests of the Hartzell ASC-II. > > John > > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com > ] On Behalf Of lessdragprod@aol.com > Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 9:08 AM > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available > > Just a point of clearification here. Michael's 3 blade MT propeller > was a new propeller available for comparison flight testing on a > flying RV-10 with a 2 blade hartzell. With no takers in over a > year, I sold the propeller to Michael. > > I have new RV-10 3 blade MT propellers available for $9,890 > delivered assembled to your closest international airport. 13" or > 14" spinner included. > > Standard colors are Red, White, Grey, Black and Yellow for the > blades, blade tips and spinner. > Grey with White tips is recommended for IFR aircraft. > Black with Yellow tips was the old CAA required blade colors. > As a special offer, White blades with Red, White and Blue tips is > available. > > A Hi-Glo spinner (looks like polished aluminum) is available for an > extra $450. > > Sorry if this offens the SPAM sensitive. Just real prices. > > Please contact me off line, or directly at the phone numbers below, > if you desire additional information. > > Jim Ayers > jim@lessdrag.com > Less Drag products, Inc - Located in California (805) 795-5377 > Custom Aircraft Propeller - Located in Florida (321) 441-3544 > > -----Original Message----- > From: RV Builder (Michael Sausen) <rvbuilder@sausen.net> > To: rv10-list@matronics.com <rv10-list@matronics.com> > Sent: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 8:14 am > Subject: RE: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available > I have to disagree, my new 3 blade MT was under 9k with 14=9D > spinner, assembly, and shipping. You don=99t pay extra for a 14=9D > spinner with MT. I did get a bit of a price break because it was > one that someone had ordered and then backed out on but this was > only a couple months ago. > > Michael > > =EF=BD=EF=BD~=EF=BD=EF=BD,=03g=EF=BD=EF=BD <prop performance.jpg>


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:25:28 PM PST US
    From: "ddddsp1@juno.com" <ddddsp1@juno.com>
    Subject: New Hartzell Available
    HARD HEADED? No way! Dean ;) PS: Why is $$ still an issue when building an RV? ____________________________________________________________ Criminal Lawyers - Click here. http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2131/fc/BLSrjnsMx6xCaygWtCqZeqmjGzEx 4BrbqCZ9EsN3WmNp0Xky6vospv1OnVO/


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:40:22 PM PST US
    From: Jesse Saint <jesse@saintaviation.com>
    Subject: Re: New Hartzell Available
    I agree completely with John. There is also, although maybe slight with the quality of the kit, a possibility of differences in the airframes and engines being tested. I know one -10 that has seen 184KTAS confirmed with groundspeed averaged runs. Others can't get over 176 or so max. I think I would even take it a notch past John in that the only true comparison can be the same plane with different props bolted on. I believe herein lies the problem. Who wants to take the time to bolt a 3-blade prop onto their 2-blade plane just to give numbers to others, since their decision was already made (and vice versa, of course). Ideally, two high-time -10'ers could fly side by side, comparing ground roll, climb rate, cruise speed (all at equal engine settings) and then swap props and do the same tests. This would give the pilots reporting an opportunity to see what their plane would do with another prop. A cross-country trip would be fantastic as well, swapping props for the return trip to compare total fuel burn for formation climbs and cruise, or comparing total trip time at the same cruising altitude. This could also give a high-time pilot the chance to "feel" the difference. I know a problem with this is the dynamic balancing issue. If a prop is dynamically balanced for one plane and then is put on another, it may not "feel" as good as it could if it were also dynamically balanced for that specific plane. It's time to get back to work, but I would personally love to see a comparison of these, but I wonder how many would actually change their mind. IMHO, I think the 2 blade is the best all-around prop for the -10 because of cost (Van's price is fantastic on this prop), the fact that it is aluminum (In my bush flying experience composite props don't last very long, so call me biased), ease of cowling installation and removal and top speed at given settings (according to most common wisdom). The -10, IMHO, already takes off and climbs so well that I have a hard time believing, except in extreme cases, that higher take- off and climb performance would be necessary. I would take a -10 over a 180HP STOL 172 or a STOL 206 for takeoff and climb off grass any day, although when the grass gets rough, it's hard to beat the Cessna gear. I have yet to see a Cirrus or Columbia demonstrate any kind of performance on takeoff that is even in the same class as the -10. That said, if the airstrip was 300 yards long or at 9,500msl, I might thing about a 3-blade regardless of cruise performance (extreme cases as mentioned above). I have taken off in a -10 at 9,500msl at gross weight (uphill, not less) and was quite happy with the performance, but I did probably use as much runway as a Cirrus typically does at my home field at 65msl. OK, now it's really time to get back to work. do not archive Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. jesse@saintaviation.com Cell: 352-427-0285 Fax: 815-377-3694 On Mar 7, 2009, at 2:44 PM, John Cox wrote: > Call me stubborn, but I did not accept the referenced test as valid > then or now. Will still lust after a long x-cntry with similar > engined RV-10s running a Hartzell 2 blade aluminum egg beater, a > Hartzell 3 blade Composite, an MT and an Aerocomp on an extended > trip. Time to climb, LOP ops, Cruise fuel flow and comfort could > all be factored with teams switching ponies on various legs to > validate parochial bias. > > We have the technology, I will await a valid comparison. The query > comes up because Jim has not acknowledge the results of a test with > his MT and I know of no unbiased test yet with all four flavors. > > Hard Headed in Aurora > > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com > ] On Behalf Of pascal > Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 9:57 AM > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available > > This has come up before. Vic did a test next to the Van's plane > (attached) and I took away that the higher HP 3 blade still was > slower than the Van's 2 blade, Rob did a preliminary, if I recall, > and it too was slower than a 2 blade, Hartzell has told me outright > that the 2 blade is faster than the composite three blade. > Three is more "sexy" but when it comes to performance at this point > the 2 blade is the best value for the dollar. > Pascal > > From: John Cox > Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 9:32 AM > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Subject: RE: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available > > Jim, you could do a big favor to the experimental market by lobbying > Gert to allow custom blade paint on the MTs. Nothing against White > Blades, Black Blades, Grey blades but boy do the American > Propeller paint jobs get my juices flowing. Some RV-10s just look > fast standing on the ramp next to a G-IV. > > I am sure Aerocomp blades would sell as many in stock "restricted" > bland paint colors but those finished blades are prettier in my eyes > and impact marketing= Sales. Enough so that money must be budgeted > a little tighter than I had planned originally. > > And isn't it tragic that not one "Head to Head" has been done in all > this time. 190 finished, flying RV-10s, nearly 1,000 kits sold and > Not Hartzell, Nor MT nor Aerocomp will take the gauntlet. Rob, I > understand your timeline priorities on great new AFS products have > distracted you, but many are leaning into the prevailing winds to > hear more on Field Tests of the Hartzell ASC-II. > > John > > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com > ] On Behalf Of lessdragprod@aol.com > Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 9:08 AM > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available > > Just a point of clearification here. Michael's 3 blade MT propeller > was a new propeller available for comparison flight testing on a > flying RV-10 with a 2 blade hartzell. With no takers in over a > year, I sold the propeller to Michael. > > I have new RV-10 3 blade MT propellers available for $9,890 > delivered assembled to your closest international airport. 13" or > 14" spinner included. > > Standard colors are Red, White, Grey, Black and Yellow for the > blades, blade tips and spinner. > Grey with White tips is recommended for IFR aircraft. > Black with Yellow tips was the old CAA required blade colors. > As a special offer, White blades with Red, White and Blue tips is > available. > > A Hi-Glo spinner (looks like polished aluminum) is available for an > extra $450. > > Sorry if this offens the SPAM sensitive. Just real prices. > > Please contact me off line, or directly at the phone numbers below, > if you desire additional information. > > Jim Ayers > jim@lessdrag.com > Less Drag products, Inc - Located in California (805) 795-5377 > Custom Aircraft Propeller - Located in Florida (321) 441-3544 > > -----Original Message----- > From: RV Builder (Michael Sausen) <rvbuilder@sausen.net> > To: rv10-list@matronics.com <rv10-list@matronics.com> > Sent: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 8:14 am > Subject: RE: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available > I have to disagree, my new 3 blade MT was under 9k with 14=9D > spinner, assembly, and shipping. You don=99t pay extra for a 14=9D > spinner with MT. I did get a bit of a price break because it was > one that someone had ordered and then backed out on but this was > only a couple months ago. > > Michael > > =EF=BD=EF=BD~=EF=BD=EF=BD, > g=EF=BD=EF=BD >


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:40:22 PM PST US
    From: "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)" <rvbuilder@sausen.net>
    Subject: New Hartzell Available
    ICBUaGUgb25seSB3YXkgdG8gcHJvZHVjZSB2YWxpZCBjb21wYXJpc29uIHJlc3VsdHMgaXMgZm9y IHRoZSBzYW1lIGFpcmNyYWZ0IHRvIHBlcmZvcm0gdGhlIHRlc3RzIHdpdGggdGhlIGRpZmZlcmVu dCBwcm9wcy4gIEFzIEppbSBzYWlkLCBoZSBoYWQgYSBwcm9wIGZvciBhIDIgYmxhZGUgLTEwIGRy aXZlciB0byBkbyB0aGlzIGNvbXBhcmlzb24gd2l0aCBidXQgbm8gb25lIHdhcyBpbnRlcmVzdGVk LiAgVGhlcmUgYXJlIHRvbyBtYW55IHZhcmlhYmxlcyBpbiBmaXQgYW5kIGZpbmlzaCBmb3Igc3Vj aCBhIGNvbXBhcmlzb24gdG8gYmUgcnVuIG9uIHR3byBkaWZmZXJlbnQgYWlyY3JhZnQgd2hlbiB3 ZSBhcmUgdGFsa2luZyBzdWNoIGEgc21hbGwgZGlmZmVyZW5jZSBpbiBwZXJmb3JtYW5jZS4NCg0K ICBVbnRpbCB0aGF0IGRheSBpdOKAmXMgZ2VuZXJhbGx5IGFjY2VwdGVkIHRoYXQgYSAzIGJsYWRl IHdpbGwgY29zdCB5b3UgYSBjb3VwbGUga25vdHMgYnV0IHdpbGwgb3V0IGNsaW1iIGEgMiBibGFk ZS4gIEp1c3QgZnJvbSB0aGUgcGh5c2ljcyBvZiB0aGUgbWF0dGVyIHRoYXQgd291bGQgbWFrZSBz ZW5zZSB0byBtZS4gIFlvdSBjYW4gYWxzbyBleHBlY3QgYW4gYWRkaXRpb25hbCBibGFkZSB0byBo ZWxwIGRhbXBlbiB0aGUgcG93ZXIgcHVsc2VzIGJldHRlciB0aGFuIGEgdHdvIGJsYWRlLiAgQWdh aW4sIHRoYXQgcGh5c2ljcy9tYXNzIHRoaW5nLiAgSSBhbHNvIGJlbGlldmUgdGhhdCBJ4oCZdmUg aGVhcmQgdGhhdCB0aGUgb2RkIG51bWJlciBvZiBibGFkZXMgd2lsbCByZWR1Y2UgdGhlIGxpa2Vs aW5lc3MgdGhhdCAgeW91IHdpbGwgZXZlciBydW4gaW50byBhIG5hc3R5IGhhcm1vbmljIGJ1dCBZ TU1WLg0KDQpNaWNoYWVsDQoNCkZyb206IG93bmVyLXJ2MTAtbGlzdC1zZXJ2ZXJAbWF0cm9uaWNz LmNvbSBbbWFpbHRvOm93bmVyLXJ2MTAtbGlzdC1zZXJ2ZXJAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbV0gT24gQmVo YWxmIE9mIEpvaG4gQ294DQpTZW50OiBTYXR1cmRheSwgTWFyY2ggMDcsIDIwMDkgMjo0NSBQTQ0K VG86IHJ2MTAtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSRTogUlYxMC1MaXN0OiBOZXcg SGFydHplbGwgQXZhaWxhYmxlDQoNCkNhbGwgbWUgc3R1YmJvcm4sIGJ1dCBJIGRpZCBub3QgYWNj ZXB0IHRoZSByZWZlcmVuY2VkIHRlc3QgYXMgdmFsaWQgdGhlbiBvciBub3cuICBXaWxsIHN0aWxs IGx1c3QgYWZ0ZXIgYSBsb25nIHgtY250cnkgd2l0aCBzaW1pbGFyIGVuZ2luZWQgUlYtMTBzIHJ1 bm5pbmcgYSBIYXJ0emVsbCAyIGJsYWRlIGFsdW1pbnVtIGVnZyBiZWF0ZXIsIGEgSGFydHplbGwg MyBibGFkZSBDb21wb3NpdGUsIGFuIE1UIGFuZCBhbiBBZXJvY29tcCBvbiBhbiBleHRlbmRlZCB0 cmlwLiAgVGltZSB0byBjbGltYiwgTE9QIG9wcywgQ3J1aXNlIGZ1ZWwgZmxvdyBhbmQgY29tZm9y dCBjb3VsZCBhbGwgYmUgZmFjdG9yZWQgd2l0aCB0ZWFtcyBzd2l0Y2hpbmcgcG9uaWVzIG9uIHZh cmlvdXMgbGVncyB0byB2YWxpZGF0ZSBwYXJvY2hpYWwgYmlhcy4NCg0KV2UgaGF2ZSB0aGUgdGVj aG5vbG9neSwgSSB3aWxsIGF3YWl0IGEgdmFsaWQgY29tcGFyaXNvbi4gIFRoZSBxdWVyeSBjb21l cyB1cCBiZWNhdXNlIEppbSBoYXMgbm90IGFja25vd2xlZGdlIHRoZSByZXN1bHRzIG9mIGEgdGVz dCB3aXRoIGhpcyBNVCBhbmQgSSBrbm93IG9mIG5vIHVuYmlhc2VkIHRlc3QgeWV0IHdpdGggYWxs IGZvdXIgZmxhdm9ycy4NCg0KSGFyZCBIZWFkZWQgaW4gQXVyb3JhDQoNCkZyb206IG93bmVyLXJ2 MTAtbGlzdC1zZXJ2ZXJAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbSBbbWFpbHRvOm93bmVyLXJ2MTAtbGlzdC1zZXJ2 ZXJAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbV0gT24gQmVoYWxmIE9mIHBhc2NhbA0KU2VudDogU2F0dXJkYXksIE1h cmNoIDA3LCAyMDA5IDk6NTcgQU0NClRvOiBydjEwLWxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbQ0KU3ViamVj dDogUmU6IFJWMTAtTGlzdDogTmV3IEhhcnR6ZWxsIEF2YWlsYWJsZQ0KDQpUaGlzIGhhcyBjb21l IHVwIGJlZm9yZS4gVmljIGRpZCBhIHRlc3QgbmV4dCB0byB0aGUgVmFuJ3MgcGxhbmUgKGF0dGFj aGVkKSBhbmQgSSB0b29rIGF3YXkgdGhhdCB0aGUgaGlnaGVyIEhQIDMgYmxhZGUgc3RpbGwgd2Fz IHNsb3dlciB0aGFuIHRoZSBWYW4ncyAyIGJsYWRlLCBSb2IgZGlkIGEgcHJlbGltaW5hcnksIGlm IEkgcmVjYWxsLCBhbmQgaXQgdG9vIHdhcyBzbG93ZXIgdGhhbiBhIDIgYmxhZGUsIEhhcnR6ZWxs IGhhcyB0b2xkIG1lIG91dHJpZ2h0IHRoYXQgdGhlIDIgYmxhZGUgaXMgZmFzdGVyIHRoYW4gdGhl IGNvbXBvc2l0ZSB0aHJlZSBibGFkZS4NClRocmVlIGlzIG1vcmUgInNleHkiIGJ1dCB3aGVuIGl0 IGNvbWVzIHRvIHBlcmZvcm1hbmNlIGF0IHRoaXMgcG9pbnQgdGhlIDIgYmxhZGUgaXMgdGhlIGJl c3QgdmFsdWUgZm9yIHRoZSBkb2xsYXIuDQpQYXNjYWwNCg0KRnJvbTogSm9obiBDb3g8bWFpbHRv OmpvaG53Y294QHBhY2lmaWNudy5jb20+DQpTZW50OiBTYXR1cmRheSwgTWFyY2ggMDcsIDIwMDkg OTozMiBBTQ0KVG86IHJ2MTAtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tPG1haWx0bzpydjEwLWxpc3RAbWF0 cm9uaWNzLmNvbT4NClN1YmplY3Q6IFJFOiBSVjEwLUxpc3Q6IE5ldyBIYXJ0emVsbCBBdmFpbGFi bGUNCg0KSmltLCB5b3UgY291bGQgZG8gYSBiaWcgZmF2b3IgdG8gdGhlIGV4cGVyaW1lbnRhbCBt YXJrZXQgYnkgbG9iYnlpbmcgR2VydCB0byBhbGxvdyBjdXN0b20gYmxhZGUgcGFpbnQgb24gdGhl IE1Ucy4gIE5vdGhpbmcgYWdhaW5zdCBXaGl0ZSBCbGFkZXMsIEJsYWNrIEJsYWRlcywgR3JleSBi bGFkZXPigKYgYnV0IGJveSBkbyB0aGUgQW1lcmljYW4gUHJvcGVsbGVyIHBhaW50IGpvYnMgZ2V0 IG15IGp1aWNlcyBmbG93aW5nLiAgU29tZSBSVi0xMHMganVzdCBsb29rIGZhc3Qgc3RhbmRpbmcg b24gdGhlIHJhbXAgbmV4dCB0byBhIEctSVYuDQoNCkkgYW0gc3VyZSBBZXJvY29tcCBibGFkZXMg d291bGQgc2VsbCBhcyBtYW55IGluIHN0b2NrICJyZXN0cmljdGVkIiBibGFuZCBwYWludCBjb2xv cnMgYnV0IHRob3NlIGZpbmlzaGVkIGJsYWRlcyBhcmUgcHJldHRpZXIgaW4gbXkgZXllcyBhbmQg aW1wYWN0IG1hcmtldGluZz0gU2FsZXMuICBFbm91Z2ggc28gdGhhdCBtb25leSBtdXN0IGJlIGJ1 ZGdldGVkIGEgbGl0dGxlIHRpZ2h0ZXIgdGhhbiBJIGhhZCBwbGFubmVkIG9yaWdpbmFsbHkuDQoN CkFuZCBpc24ndCBpdCB0cmFnaWMgdGhhdCBub3Qgb25lICJIZWFkIHRvIEhlYWQiIGhhcyBiZWVu IGRvbmUgaW4gYWxsIHRoaXMgdGltZS4gIDE5MCBmaW5pc2hlZCwgZmx5aW5nIFJWLTEwcywgbmVh cmx5IDEsMDAwIGtpdHMgc29sZCBhbmQgTm90IEhhcnR6ZWxsLCBOb3IgTVQgbm9yIEFlcm9jb21w IHdpbGwgdGFrZSB0aGUgZ2F1bnRsZXQuICBSb2IsIEkgdW5kZXJzdGFuZCB5b3VyIHRpbWVsaW5l IHByaW9yaXRpZXMgb24gZ3JlYXQgbmV3IEFGUyBwcm9kdWN0cyBoYXZlIGRpc3RyYWN0ZWQgeW91 LCBidXQgbWFueSBhcmUgbGVhbmluZyBpbnRvIHRoZSBwcmV2YWlsaW5nIHdpbmRzIHRvIGhlYXIg bW9yZSBvbiBGaWVsZCBUZXN0cyBvZiB0aGUgSGFydHplbGwgQVNDLUlJLg0KDQpKb2huDQoNCkZy b206IG93bmVyLXJ2MTAtbGlzdC1zZXJ2ZXJAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbSBbbWFpbHRvOm93bmVyLXJ2 MTAtbGlzdC1zZXJ2ZXJAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbV0gT24gQmVoYWxmIE9mIGxlc3NkcmFncHJvZEBh b2wuY29tDQpTZW50OiBTYXR1cmRheSwgTWFyY2ggMDcsIDIwMDkgOTowOCBBTQ0KVG86IHJ2MTAt bGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogUlYxMC1MaXN0OiBOZXcgSGFydHplbGwg QXZhaWxhYmxlDQoNCkp1c3QgYSBwb2ludCBvZiBjbGVhcmlmaWNhdGlvbiBoZXJlLiAgTWljaGFl bCdzIDMgYmxhZGUgTVQgcHJvcGVsbGVyIHdhcyBhIG5ldyBwcm9wZWxsZXIgYXZhaWxhYmxlIGZv ciBjb21wYXJpc29uIGZsaWdodCB0ZXN0aW5nIG9uIGEgZmx5aW5nIFJWLTEwIHdpdGggYSAyIGJs YWRlIGhhcnR6ZWxsLiAgV2l0aCBubyB0YWtlcnMgaW4gb3ZlciBhIHllYXIsIEkgc29sZCB0aGUg cHJvcGVsbGVyIHRvIE1pY2hhZWwuDQoNCkkgaGF2ZSBuZXcgUlYtMTAgMyBibGFkZSBNVCBwcm9w ZWxsZXJzIGF2YWlsYWJsZSBmb3IgJDksODkwIGRlbGl2ZXJlZCBhc3NlbWJsZWQgdG8geW91ciBj bG9zZXN0IGludGVybmF0aW9uYWwgYWlycG9ydC4gIDEzIiBvciAxNCIgc3Bpbm5lciBpbmNsdWRl ZC4NCg0KU3RhbmRhcmQgY29sb3JzIGFyZSBSZWQsIFdoaXRlLCBHcmV5LCBCbGFjayBhbmQgWWVs bG93IGZvciB0aGUgYmxhZGVzLCBibGFkZSB0aXBzIGFuZCBzcGlubmVyLg0KR3JleSB3aXRoIFdo aXRlIHRpcHMgaXMgcmVjb21tZW5kZWQgZm9yIElGUiBhaXJjcmFmdC4NCkJsYWNrIHdpdGggWWVs bG93IHRpcHMgd2FzIHRoZSBvbGQgQ0FBIHJlcXVpcmVkIGJsYWRlIGNvbG9ycy4NCkFzIGEgc3Bl Y2lhbCBvZmZlciwgV2hpdGUgYmxhZGVzIHdpdGggUmVkLCBXaGl0ZSBhbmQgQmx1ZSB0aXBzIGlz IGF2YWlsYWJsZS4NCg0KQSBIaS1HbG8gc3Bpbm5lciAobG9va3MgbGlrZSBwb2xpc2hlZCBhbHVt aW51bSkgaXMgYXZhaWxhYmxlIGZvciBhbiBleHRyYSAkNDUwLg0KDQpTb3JyeSBpZiB0aGlzIG9m ZmVucyB0aGUgU1BBTSBzZW5zaXRpdmUuICBKdXN0IHJlYWwgcHJpY2VzLg0KDQpQbGVhc2UgY29u dGFjdCBtZSBvZmYgbGluZSwgb3IgZGlyZWN0bHkgYXQgdGhlIHBob25lIG51bWJlcnMgYmVsb3cs IGlmIHlvdSBkZXNpcmUgYWRkaXRpb25hbCBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbi4NCg0KSmltIEF5ZXJzDQpqaW1A bGVzc2RyYWcuY29tPG1haWx0bzpqaW1AbGVzc2RyYWcuY29tPg0KTGVzcyBEcmFnIHByb2R1Y3Rz LCBJbmMgLSBMb2NhdGVkIGluIENhbGlmb3JuaWEgKDgwNSkgNzk1LTUzNzcNCkN1c3RvbSBBaXJj cmFmdCBQcm9wZWxsZXIgLSBMb2NhdGVkIGluIEZsb3JpZGEgKDMyMSkgNDQxLTM1NDQNCg0KLS0t LS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCkZyb206IFJWIEJ1aWxkZXIgKE1pY2hhZWwgU2F1c2Vu KSA8cnZidWlsZGVyQHNhdXNlbi5uZXQ+DQpUbzogcnYxMC1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20gPHJ2 MTAtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tPg0KU2VudDogU2F0LCA3IE1hciAyMDA5IDg6MTQgYW0NClN1 YmplY3Q6IFJFOiBSVjEwLUxpc3Q6IE5ldyBIYXJ0emVsbCBBdmFpbGFibGUNCiAgSSBoYXZlIHRv IGRpc2FncmVlLCBteSBuZXcgMyBibGFkZSBNVCB3YXMgdW5kZXIgOWsgd2l0aCAxNOKAnSBzcGlu bmVyLCBhc3NlbWJseSwgYW5kIHNoaXBwaW5nLiAgWW91IGRvbuKAmXQgcGF5IGV4dHJhIGZvciBh IDE04oCdIHNwaW5uZXIgd2l0aCBNVC4gIEkgZGlkIGdldCBhIGJpdCBvZiBhIHByaWNlIGJyZWFr IGJlY2F1c2UgaXQgd2FzIG9uZSB0aGF0IHNvbWVvbmUgaGFkIG9yZGVyZWQgYW5kIHRoZW4gYmFj a2VkIG91dCBvbiBidXQgdGhpcyB3YXMgb25seSBhIGNvdXBsZSBtb250aHMgYWdvLg0KDQpNaWNo YWVsDQoNCu+/ve+/vX7vv73vv70sDQpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0K Z++/ve+/vQ0Ka3nonpsiza1aK9ONNNOH2rHnqLp3cuqTheSVl0LispEmailFUset45q2J8uLy4V5 buuNqmraq+uji+KAkWp8y64pYifnoarCotWnK8qi2Kgg3IYr3onmq7Logrload6DayBrDQrigJEg FA0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCmh53ZrnoZrnoZreqt6+be+/jO+/ vSfLnG/Nqmraq0VddC4rLdupMMKm4rKHKCYjODk2OTM2O9GXXQ0Ky79oE0TjiIklDQpfX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KU1DEkmpn5q2y77+9WsqaaV4m5Z6sWitr26nvv73v v71reMqm26nvv73vv71reMqm4rKQ2qJu66KidW0oeThaTCvKi+meruqpokxq24NleGZ256G22r8N CjBreMqmyqfYqG3vv4zvv70ny5xv3KJ7a2vvv73vv73vv73evcu4bQ0K


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:43:59 PM PST US
    From: "Bob-tcw" <rnewman@tcwtech.com>
    Subject: rear window install
    I've been working on our canopy and overhead console and now have it ready for final installation on the fuselage. Looking ahead, the plans call for installing the rear windows after the canopy is permanently installed. Has anyone done the rear window install with the canopy off the fuselage? The benefits seem to be : 1) a lot more clamping capability 2) the canopy can be turned so gravity is your friend with respect to dealing with the Weld-on. Thoughts and comments would be appreciated, Bob Newman 40176


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:04:45 PM PST US
    From: DLIUDVINAITIS@aol.com
    Subject: Re: rear window install
    HEY BOB, I'M FINISHING UP MY OVERHEAD AND DOING SMOOTH PRIMING, FILLING ALL THE PIN HOLES, AS FOR INSTALLING REAR WINDOWS I'M WITH YOU ON INSTALLING ON BENCH, GRAVITY DOES HELP WITH THE GOO. THATS THE WAY I WILL DO MY REAR WINDOWS, SOME OTHERS HAVE DONE THIS AS WELL. DAVE #40466, CENTRAL NJ In a message dated 3/7/2009 4:46:21 P.M. Central Standard Time, rnewman@tcwtech.com writes: I've been working on our canopy and overhead console and now have it ready for final installation on the fuselage. Looking ahead, the plans call for installing the rear windows after the canopy is permanently installed. Has anyone done the rear window install with the canopy off the fuselage? The benefits seem to be : 1) a lot more clamping capability 2) the canopy can be turned so gravity is your friend with respect to dealing with the Weld-on. Thoughts and comments would be appreciated, Bob Newman 40176 (http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List) (http://www.matronics.com/contribution) **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! %3D62%26bcd%3DfebemailfooterNO62)


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:10:20 PM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: New Hartzell Available
    I will fly off the various prop....all on the same day. All they have to do is GIVE me all of them for free and let me keep my favorite when I'm done....At zero cost. All must be brand new. Tim On Mar 7, 2009, at 3:38 PM, Jesse Saint <jesse@saintaviation.com> wrote: > I agree completely with John. There is also, although maybe slight > with the quality of the kit, a possibility of differences in the > airframes and engines being tested. I know one -10 that has seen > 184KTAS confirmed with groundspeed averaged runs. Others can't get > over 176 or so max. > > I think I would even take it a notch past John in that the only true > comparison can be the same plane with different props bolted on. I > believe herein lies the problem. Who wants to take the time to bolt > a 3-blade prop onto their 2-blade plane just to give numbers to > others, since their decision was already made (and vice versa, of > course). > > Ideally, two high-time -10'ers could fly side by side, comparing > ground roll, climb rate, cruise speed (all at equal engine settings) > and then swap props and do the same tests. This would give the > pilots reporting an opportunity to see what their plane would do > with another prop. A cross-country trip would be fantastic as well, > swapping props for the return trip to compare total fuel burn for > formation climbs and cruise, or comparing total trip time at the > same cruising altitude. > > This could also give a high-time pilot the chance to "feel" the > difference. I know a problem with this is the dynamic balancing > issue. If a prop is dynamically balanced for one plane and then is > put on another, it may not "feel" as good as it could if it were > also dynamically balanced for that specific plane. > > It's time to get back to work, but I would personally love to see a > comparison of these, but I wonder how many would actually change > their mind. IMHO, I think the 2 blade is the best all-around prop > for the -10 because of cost (Van's price is fantastic on this prop), > the fact that it is aluminum (In my bush flying experience composite > props don't last very long, so call me biased), ease of cowling > installation and removal and top speed at given settings (according > to most common wisdom). The -10, IMHO, already takes off and climbs > so well that I have a hard time believing, except in extreme cases, > that higher take-off and climb performance would be necessary. I > would take a -10 over a 180HP STOL 172 or a STOL 206 for takeoff and > climb off grass any day, although when the grass gets rough, it's > hard to beat the Cessna gear. I have yet to see a Cirrus or > Columbia demonstrate any kind of performance on takeoff that is even > in the same class as the -10. That said, if the airstrip was 300 > yards long or at 9,500msl, I might thing about a 3-blade regardless > of cruise performance (extreme cases as mentioned above). I have > taken off in a -10 at 9,500msl at gross weight (uphill, not less) > and was quite happy with the performance, but I did probably use as > much runway as a Cirrus typically does at my home field at 65msl. > > OK, now it's really time to get back to work. > > do not archive > > Jesse Saint > Saint Aviation, Inc. > jesse@saintaviation.com > Cell: 352-427-0285 > Fax: 815-377-3694 > > On Mar 7, 2009, at 2:44 PM, John Cox wrote: > >> Call me stubborn, but I did not accept the referenced test as valid >> then or now. Will still lust after a long x-cntry with similar >> engined RV-10s running a Hartzell 2 blade aluminum egg beater, a >> Hartzell 3 blade Composite, an MT and an Aerocomp on an extended >> trip. Time to climb, LOP ops, Cruise fuel flow and comfort could >> all be factored with teams switching ponies on various legs to >> validate parochial bias. >> >> We have the technology, I will await a valid comparison. The query >> comes up because Jim has not acknowledge the results of a test with >> his MT and I know of no unbiased test yet with all four flavors. >> >> Hard Headed in Aurora >> >> From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com >> ] On Behalf Of pascal >> Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 9:57 AM >> To: rv10-list@matronics.com >> Subject: Re: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available >> >> This has come up before. Vic did a test next to the Van's plane >> (attached) and I took away that the higher HP 3 blade still was >> slower than the Van's 2 blade, Rob did a preliminary, if I recall, >> and it too was slower than a 2 blade, Hartzell has told me outright >> that the 2 blade is faster than the composite three blade. >> Three is more "sexy" but when it comes to performance at this point >> the 2 blade is the best value for the dollar. >> Pascal >> >> From: John Cox >> Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 9:32 AM >> To: rv10-list@matronics.com >> Subject: RE: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available >> >> Jim, you could do a big favor to the experimental market by >> lobbying Gert to allow custom blade paint on the MTs. Nothing >> against White Blades, Black Blades, Grey blades but boy do the Am >> erican Propeller paint jobs get my juices flowing. Some RV-10s ju >> st look fast standing on the ramp next to a G-IV. >> >> I am sure Aerocomp blades would sell as many in stock "restricted" >> bland paint colors but those finished blades are prettier in my >> eyes and impact marketing= Sales. Enough so that money must be >> budgeted a little tighter than I had planned originally. >> >> And isn't it tragic that not one "Head to Head" has been done in >> all this time. 190 finished, flying RV-10s, nearly 1,000 kits sold >> and Not Hartzell, Nor MT nor Aerocomp will take the gauntlet. Rob, >> I understand your timeline priorities on great new AFS products >> have distracted you, but many are leaning into the prevailing winds >> to hear more on Field Tests of the Hartzell ASC-II. >> >> John >> >> From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com >> ] On Behalf Of lessdragprod@aol.com >> Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 9:08 AM >> To: rv10-list@matronics.com >> Subject: Re: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available >> >> Just a point of clearification here. Michael's 3 blade MT >> propeller was a new propeller available for comparison flight >> testing on a flying RV-10 with a 2 blade hartzell. With no takers >> in over a year, I sold the propeller to Michael. >> >> I have new RV-10 3 blade MT propellers available for $9,890 >> delivered assembled to your closest international airport. 13" or >> 14" spinner included. >> >> Standard colors are Red, White, Grey, Black and Yellow for the >> blades, blade tips and spinner. >> Grey with White tips is recommended for IFR aircraft. >> Black with Yellow tips was the old CAA required blade colors. >> As a special offer, White blades with Red, White and Blue tips is >> available. >> >> A Hi-Glo spinner (looks like polished aluminum) is available for an >> extra $450. >> >> Sorry if this offens the SPAM sensitive. Just real prices. >> >> Please contact me off line, or directly at the phone numbers below, >> if you desire additional information. >> >> Jim Ayers >> jim@lessdrag.com >> Less Drag products, Inc - Located in California (805) 795-5377 >> Custom Aircraft Propeller - Located in Florida (321) 441-3544 >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: RV Builder (Michael Sausen) <rvbuilder@sausen.net> >> To: rv10-list@matronics.com <rv10-list@matronics.com> >> Sent: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 8:14 am >> Subject: RE: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available >> I have to disagree, my new 3 blade MT was under 9k with 14=9D spin >> ner, assembly, and shipping. You don=99t pay extra for a 14 =9D >> spinner with MT. I did get a bit of a price break because it was >> one that someone had ordered and then backed out on but this was o >> nly a couple months ago. >> >> Michael >> >> =EF=BD=EF=BD~=EF=BD=EF=BD, >> g=EF=BD=EF=BD >> >> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> black; text-decoration: underline; ">http://forums.matronics.com >> style="color: black; text-decoration: underline; ">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > >


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:46:08 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Another Milestone
    From: "geoff Combs" <g.combs58@yahoo.com>
    I can't wait to have that same smile on my face. Great airplane Deems. Geoff -------- Build QB RV-10 N829GW Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=233631#233631


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:34:18 PM PST US
    From: "Evan & Tania" <etandrews@westnet.com.au>
    Subject: Another Milestone
    Fantastic photo and result Deems! Evan & Tania Andrews 40379 Flying -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Deems Davis Sent: Saturday, 7 March 2009 11:30 AM Subject: RV10-List: Another Milestone Well today marked another pretty big milestone for me. Gary Towner (DAR) drove down from Overgaard today, and performed an inspection of N519PJ. Gary had all of the parperwork ready, except for the affidavit, that I had to have notarized, and we began by completing the required forms. Made appropriate entry in my (new) Airframe log book, and then we moved to the inspection. Gary's primary focus and concern was the flight controls. we began inside of the cockpit, and then proceeded outside to all of the flight surfaces and connections. His next stop was the firewall forward area. I pointed out to him one item I noticed yesterday, where I hadn't sealed (RTV) a firewall passthrough. Gary spent about 1 1/2 hours on the inspection, and didn't note any squawks. We moved back to finalize the A/W certificate, and went through the Ops Limitations. Gary gave me a REALLY big Phase 1 test area. Essentially DVT to Kingman, to Laughlin (Colorado River) down the river to Parker then SouthEast all the way to Casa Grande, then back west of PHX (Goodyear, Glendale) and back to DVT. Gary helped walk me through the repairmans cert application, and then handed me the A/W cert and the Ops Lim and made the official entry in the Airframe logbook. 1st flight will occur as soon as the FAA sends my medical. My AME said to expect May1 :'( http://deemsrv10.com/album/Final%20Assembly/slides/DSC07403.html Deems Davis # 406 'Its all done............ period! http://deemsrv10.com/ E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (6.0.0.386) Database version: 5.11910 http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor-antivirus/ E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (6.0.0.386) Database version: 5.11910 http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor-antivirus/


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:34:18 PM PST US
    Subject: New Hartzell Available
    From: "John Cox" <johnwcox@pacificnw.com>
    And I thought fuel would have to be provided. Here is the attached file that Pascal referenced. It has been a year but then I keep every article and picture... what can I say. Randy's was running an ole style reconditioned 2 blade Hartzell, Ken S was implying that Vic's aircraft did not deliver the power represented by his engine builder, the specs were compared for N104ME at a higher altitude and greater flying weight. Before Tim offered, I was about to through sponsorship money into a kitty. Each aircraft would have to be ballast loaded to the same CG and same T.O. weight. All would have to have the same fuel. They would all fly the same course. They would be timed. The fuel consumed, time enroute and settings would have do be Data Logged. As many guys who want to participate could. I would love it if all four flavors were represented at the same time. You have to read the parochial propaganda bent in the enclosed article. Have fun. Hope Matt does not strip off the article. John Cox ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com on behalf of Tim Olson Sent: Sat 3/7/2009 3:09 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available I will fly off the various prop....all on the same day. All they have to do is GIVE me all of them for free and let me keep my favorite when I'm done....At zero cost. All must be brand new. Tim On Mar 7, 2009, at 3:38 PM, Jesse Saint <jesse@saintaviation.com> wrote: I agree completely with John. There is also, although maybe slight with the quality of the kit, a possibility of differences in the airframes and engines being tested. I know one -10 that has seen 184KTAS confirmed with groundspeed averaged runs. Others can't get over 176 or so max. I think I would even take it a notch past John in that the only true comparison can be the same plane with different props bolted on. I believe herein lies the problem. Who wants to take the time to bolt a 3-blade prop onto their 2-blade plane just to give numbers to others, since their decision was already made (and vice versa, of course). Ideally, two high-time -10'ers could fly side by side, comparing ground roll, climb rate, cruise speed (all at equal engine settings) and then swap props and do the same tests. This would give the pilots reporting an opportunity to see what their plane would do with another prop. A cross-country trip would be fantastic as well, swapping props for the return trip to compare total fuel burn for formation climbs and cruise, or comparing total trip time at the same cruising altitude. This could also give a high-time pilot the chance to "feel" the difference. I know a problem with this is the dynamic balancing issue. If a prop is dynamically balanced for one plane and then is put on another, it may not "feel" as good as it could if it were also dynamically balanced for that specific plane. It's time to get back to work, but I would personally love to see a comparison of these, but I wonder how many would actually change their mind. IMHO, I think the 2 blade is the best all-around prop for the -10 because of cost (Van's price is fantastic on this prop), the fact that it is aluminum (In my bush flying experience composite props don't last very long, so call me biased), ease of cowling installation and removal and top speed at given settings (according to most common wisdom). The -10, IMHO, already takes off and climbs so well that I have a hard time believing, except in extreme cases, that higher take-off and climb performance would be necessary. I would take a -10 over a 180HP STOL 172 or a STOL 206 for takeoff and climb off grass any day, although when the grass gets rough, it's hard to beat the Cessna gear. I have yet to see a Cirrus or Columbia demonstrate any kind of performance on takeoff that is even in the same class as the -10. That said, if the airstrip was 300 yards long or at 9,500msl, I might thing about a 3-blade regardless of cruise performance (extreme cases as mentioned above). I have taken off in a -10 at 9,500msl at gross weight (uphill, not less) and was quite happy with the performance, but I did probably use as much runway as a Cirrus typically does at my home field at 65msl. OK, now it's really time to get back to work. do not archive Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. <mailto:jesse@saintaviation.com> jesse@saintaviation.com Cell: 352-427-0285 Fax: 815-377-3694 On Mar 7, 2009, at 2:44 PM, John Cox wrote: Call me stubborn, but I did not accept the referenced test as valid then or now. Will still lust after a long x-cntry with similar engined RV-10s running a Hartzell 2 blade aluminum egg beater, a Hartzell 3 blade Composite, an MT and an Aerocomp on an extended trip. Time to climb, LOP ops, Cruise fuel flow and comfort could all be factored with teams switching ponies on various legs to validate parochial bias. We have the technology, I will await a valid comparison. The query comes up because Jim has not acknowledge the results of a test with his MT and I know of no unbiased test yet with all four flavors. Hard Headed in Aurora From: <mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com> owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [ <mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com> mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of pascal Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 9:57 AM To: <mailto:rv10-list@matronics.com> rv10-list@matronics.com Subject: Re: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available This has come up before. Vic did a test next to the Van's plane (attached) and I took away that the higher HP 3 blade still was slower than the Van's 2 blade, Rob did a preliminary, if I recall, and it too was slower than a 2 blade, Hartzell has told me outright that the 2 blade is faster than the composite three blade. Three is more "sexy" but when it comes to performance at this point the 2 blade is the best value for the dollar. Pascal From: John Cox <mailto:johnwcox@pacificnw.com> Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 9:32 AM To: <mailto:rv10-list@matronics.com> rv10-list@matronics.com Subject: RE: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available Jim, you could do a big favor to the experimental market by lobbying Gert to allow custom blade paint on the MTs. Nothing against White Blades, Black Blades, Grey blades... but boy do the American Propeller paint jobs get my juices flowing. Some RV-10s just look fast standing on the ramp next to a G-IV. I am sure Aerocomp blades would sell as many in stock "restricted" bland paint colors but those finished blades are prettier in my eyes and impact marketing= Sales. Enough so that money must be budgeted a little tighter than I had planned originally. And isn't it tragic that not one "Head to Head" has been done in all this time. 190 finished, flying RV-10s, nearly 1,000 kits sold and Not Hartzell, Nor MT nor Aerocomp will take the gauntlet. Rob, I understand your timeline priorities on great new AFS products have distracted you, but many are leaning into the prevailing winds to hear more on Field Tests of the Hartzell ASC-II. John From: <mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com> owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [ <mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com> mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of <mailto:lessdragprod@aol.com> lessdragprod@aol.com Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 9:08 AM To: <mailto:rv10-list@matronics.com> rv10-list@matronics.com Subject: Re: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available Just a point of clearification here. Michael's 3 blade MT propeller was a new propeller available for comparison flight testing on a flying RV-10 with a 2 blade hartzell. With no takers in over a year, I sold the propeller to Michael. I have new RV-10 3 blade MT propellers available for $9,890 delivered assembled to your closest international airport. 13" or 14" spinner included. Standard colors are Red, White, Grey, Black and Yellow for the blades, blade tips and spinner. Grey with White tips is recommended for IFR aircraft. Black with Yellow tips was the old CAA required blade colors. As a special offer, White blades with Red, White and Blue tips is available. A Hi-Glo spinner (looks like polished aluminum) is available for an extra $450. Sorry if this offens the SPAM sensitive. Just real prices. Please contact me off line, or directly at the phone numbers below, if you desire additional information. Jim Ayers <mailto:jim@lessdrag.com> jim@lessdrag.com Less Drag products, Inc - Located in California (805) 795-5377 Custom Aircraft Propeller - Located in Florida (321) 441-3544 -----Original Message----- From: RV Builder (Michael Sausen) < <mailto:rvbuilder@sausen.net> rvbuilder@sausen.net> To: <mailto:rv10-list@matronics.com> rv10-list@matronics.com < <mailto:rv10-list@matronics.com> rv10-list@matronics.com> Sent: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 8:14 am Subject: RE: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available I have to disagree, my new 3 blade MT was under 9k with 14" spinner, assembly, and shipping. You don't pay extra for a 14" spinner with MT. I did get a bit of a price break because it was one that someone had ordered and then backed out on but this was only a couple months ago. Michael ??~??, ________________________________ g?? http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List black; text-decoration: underline; ">http://forums.matronics.com <http://forums.matronics.com/> style="color: black; text-decoration: underline; ">http://www.matronics.com/contribution href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronic s.com/Navigator?RV10-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c ontribution


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:22:29 PM PST US
    From: "pascal" <pascal@rv10builder.net>
    Subject: Re: New Hartzell Available
    Thanks John, I thought I sent the complete article.. I think a meeting is needed with all flavors, Tim, Rob, Deems and a 3 blade MT contender all meet up at local airport and do a systematic test. From: John Cox Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 4:25 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available And I thought fuel would have to be provided. Here is the attached file that Pascal referenced. It has been a year but then I keep every article and picture... what can I say. Randy's was running an ole style reconditioned 2 blade Hartzell, Ken S was implying that Vic's aircraft did not deliver the power represented by his engine builder, the specs were compared for N104ME at a higher altitude and greater flying weight. Before Tim offered, I was about to through sponsorship money into a kitty. Each aircraft would have to be ballast loaded to the same CG and same T.O. weight. All would have to have the same fuel. They would all fly the same course. They would be timed. The fuel consumed, time enroute and settings would have do be Data Logged. As many guys who want to participate could. I would love it if all four flavors were represented at the same time. You have to read the parochial propaganda bent in the enclosed article. Have fun. Hope Matt does not strip off the article. John Cox ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com on behalf of Tim Olson Sent: Sat 3/7/2009 3:09 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available I will fly off the various prop....all on the same day. All they have to do is GIVE me all of them for free and let me keep my favorite when I'm done....At zero cost. All must be brand new. Tim On Mar 7, 2009, at 3:38 PM, Jesse Saint <jesse@saintaviation.com> wrote: I agree completely with John. There is also, although maybe slight with the quality of the kit, a possibility of differences in the airframes and engines being tested. I know one -10 that has seen 184KTAS confirmed with groundspeed averaged runs. Others can't get over 176 or so max. I think I would even take it a notch past John in that the only true comparison can be the same plane with different props bolted on. I believe herein lies the problem. Who wants to take the time to bolt a 3-blade prop onto their 2-blade plane just to give numbers to others, since their decision was already made (and vice versa, of course). Ideally, two high-time -10'ers could fly side by side, comparing ground roll, climb rate, cruise speed (all at equal engine settings) and then swap props and do the same tests. This would give the pilots reporting an opportunity to see what their plane would do with another prop. A cross-country trip would be fantastic as well, swapping props for the return trip to compare total fuel burn for formation climbs and cruise, or comparing total trip time at the same cruising altitude. This could also give a high-time pilot the chance to "feel" the difference. I know a problem with this is the dynamic balancing issue. If a prop is dynamically balanced for one plane and then is put on another, it may not "feel" as good as it could if it were also dynamically balanced for that specific plane. It's time to get back to work, but I would personally love to see a comparison of these, but I wonder how many would actually change their mind. IMHO, I think the 2 blade is the best all-around prop for the -10 because of cost (Van's price is fantastic on this prop), the fact that it is aluminum (In my bush flying experience composite props don't last very long, so call me biased), ease of cowling installation and removal and top speed at given settings (according to most common wisdom). The -10, IMHO, already takes off and climbs so well that I have a hard time believing, except in extreme cases, that higher take-off and climb performance would be necessary. I would take a -10 over a 180HP STOL 172 or a STOL 206 for takeoff and climb off grass any day, although when the grass gets rough, it's hard to beat the Cessna gear. I have yet to see a Cirrus or Columbia demonstrate any kind of performance on takeoff that is even in the same class as the -10. That said, if the airstrip was 300 yards long or at 9,500msl, I might thing about a 3-blade regardless of cruise performance (extreme cases as mentioned above). I have taken off in a -10 at 9,500msl at gross weight (uphill, not less) and was quite happy with the performance, but I did probably use as much runway as a Cirrus typically does at my home field at 65msl. OK, now it's really time to get back to work. do not archive Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. jesse@saintaviation.com Cell: 352-427-0285 Fax: 815-377-3694 On Mar 7, 2009, at 2:44 PM, John Cox wrote: Call me stubborn, but I did not accept the referenced test as valid then or now. Will still lust after a long x-cntry with similar engined RV-10s running a Hartzell 2 blade aluminum egg beater, a Hartzell 3 blade Composite, an MT and an Aerocomp on an extended trip. Time to climb, LOP ops, Cruise fuel flow and comfort could all be factored with teams switching ponies on various legs to validate parochial bias. We have the technology, I will await a valid comparison. The query comes up because Jim has not acknowledge the results of a test with his MT and I know of no unbiased test yet with all four flavors. Hard Headed in Aurora From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of pascal Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 9:57 AM To: rv10-list@matronics.com Subject: Re: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available This has come up before. Vic did a test next to the Van's plane (attached) and I took away that the higher HP 3 blade still was slower than the Van's 2 blade, Rob did a preliminary, if I recall, and it too was slower than a 2 blade, Hartzell has told me outright that the 2 blade is faster than the composite three blade. Three is more "sexy" but when it comes to performance at this point the 2 blade is the best value for the dollar. Pascal From: John Cox Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 9:32 AM To: rv10-list@matronics.com Subject: RE: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available Jim, you could do a big favor to the experimental market by lobbying Gert to allow custom blade paint on the MTs. Nothing against White Blades, Black Blades, Grey blades. but boy do the American Propeller paint jobs get my juices flowing. Some RV-10s just look fast standing on the ramp next to a G-IV. I am sure Aerocomp blades would sell as many in stock "restricted" bland paint colors but those finished blades are prettier in my eyes and impact marketing= Sales. Enough so that money must be budgeted a little tighter than I had planned originally. And isn't it tragic that not one "Head to Head" has been done in all this time. 190 finished, flying RV-10s, nearly 1,000 kits sold and Not Hartzell, Nor MT nor Aerocomp will take the gauntlet. Rob, I understand your timeline priorities on great new AFS products have distracted you, but many are leaning into the prevailing winds to hear more on Field Tests of the Hartzell ASC-II. John From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of lessdragprod@aol.com Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 9:08 AM To: rv10-list@matronics.com Subject: Re: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available Just a point of clearification here. Michael's 3 blade MT propeller was a new propeller available for comparison flight testing on a flying RV-10 with a 2 blade hartzell. With no takers in over a year, I sold the propeller to Michael. I have new RV-10 3 blade MT propellers available for $9,890 delivered assembled to your closest international airport. 13" or 14" spinner included. Standard colors are Red, White, Grey, Black and Yellow for the blades, blade tips and spinner. Grey with White tips is recommended for IFR aircraft. Black with Yellow tips was the old CAA required blade colors. As a special offer, White blades with Red, White and Blue tips is available. A Hi-Glo spinner (looks like polished aluminum) is available for an extra $450. Sorry if this offens the SPAM sensitive. Just real prices. Please contact me off line, or directly at the phone numbers below, if you desire additional information. Jim Ayers jim@lessdrag.com Less Drag products, Inc - Located in California (805) 795-5377 Custom Aircraft Propeller - Located in Florida (321) 441-3544 -----Original Message----- From: RV Builder (Michael Sausen) <rvbuilder@sausen.net> To: rv10-list@matronics.com <rv10-list@matronics.com> Sent: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 8:14 am Subject: RE: RV10-List: New Hartzell Available I have to disagree, my new 3 blade MT was under 9k with 14" spinner, assembly, and shipping. You don't pay extra for a 14" spinner with MT. I did get a bit of a price break because it was one that someone had ordered and then backed out on but this was only a couple months ago. Michael ??~??, ------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- g?? http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List black; text-decoration: underline; ">http://forums.matronics.com style="color: black; text-decoration: underline; ">http://www.matronics.com/contribution href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronic s.com/Navigator?RV10-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c ontribution href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronic s.com/Navigator?RV10-List href="http://forums.matronics.com/">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c ontribution


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:35:21 PM PST US
    From: "Bill Schlatterer" <billschlatterer@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Adel Pliers
    How about these,... if you don't have several straight and curved hemostats, you are missing a couple of great tools. About $4 at Dollar General. You can also use them to hold small nuts and washers very effectively. Bill S 7a finishing -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of johngoodman Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 1:40 PM Subject: RV10-List: Adel Pliers --> <johngoodman@earthlink.net> Has anybody tried out these Adel Clamp Pliers from Wicks? If so, are they worth the money? http://www.wicksaircraft.com/catalog/product_detail.php/pid=17313~subid=1212 3/index.html John -------- #40572 QB Fuselage, wings finished. Finish Kit started. N711JG reserved Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=233494#233494


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:58:11 PM PST US
    Subject: Flightline AC system for sale
    From: "rvdave" <davidbf@centurytel.net>
    I have a complete 14 volt Flightline system for an RV10 I will no longer be installing in my project. System is complete with overhead console for lighting and vents, compressor, condensor, evaporator, two groove starter ring gear with alt/compressor belts, all mounting hardware, all ductwork and hoses, fittings, crimping tool for hoses. $5200 plus freight. Dave Ford RV6 flying RV10 constructing rvdave@centurytel.net Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=233650#233650




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv10-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV10-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv10-list
  • Browse RV10-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --