RV10-List Digest Archive

Sun 04/26/09


Total Messages Posted: 10



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:42 AM - Dual static line runs? (tomhanaway)
     2. 06:02 AM - Re: Dual static line runs? (Tim Olson)
     3. 06:02 AM - Re: EIS Settings (Tim Olson)
     4. 06:06 AM - Re: Dual static line runs? (Jesse Saint)
     5. 06:29 AM - Re: Dual static line runs? (Tim Olson)
     6. 06:55 AM - Re: Dual static line runs? (Rene Felker)
     7. 06:58 AM - Re: Dual static line runs? (richard sipp)
     8. 01:14 PM - Re: Dual static line runs? (jim@CombsFive.Com)
     9. 02:35 PM - Re: Dual static line runs? (tomhanaway)
    10. 06:32 PM - Re: Re: Dual static line runs? (jim@CombsFive.Com)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:42:26 AM PST US
    Subject: Dual static line runs?
    From: "tomhanaway" <tomhanaway@comcast.net>
    Trutrak suggests that a large # of demands on static line may cause lag in auto pilot. Their suggestion is to run two static lines forward to panel IF this occurs. My current panel is two AFS 4500's, one AFS 3400, 2&1/4" backup altimeter and airspeed, trutrak adi and vsvg2 autopilot , and 430w garmin stack for demands on static line. Has anyone actually found a need for a second static line (still using just the original two static ports) or is one sufficient? I'd like to avoid second line but if I'm going to run one, now's the time. Thanks, Tom H. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=241293#241293


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:02:08 AM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: Dual static line runs?
    I used that Tygon tubing for static and I've not seen any problems even with at least 7 items tapped off of it. I'm not sure if tubing size for other types of tubing would have an effect or not, but I can only say that what I'm using seems to be fine. I'd give it a try I guess before you worry about pulling more lines, because unless you add 2 more static ports, I don't know that adding the additional volume of another line would be a good thing. Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying do not archive tomhanaway wrote: > <tomhanaway@comcast.net> > > Trutrak suggests that a large # of demands on static line may cause > lag in auto pilot. Their suggestion is to run two static lines > forward to panel IF this occurs. > > My current panel is two AFS 4500's, one AFS 3400, 2&1/4" backup > altimeter and airspeed, trutrak adi and vsvg2 autopilot , and 430w > garmin stack for demands on static line. > > Has anyone actually found a need for a second static line (still > using just the original two static ports) or is one sufficient? > > I'd like to avoid second line but if I'm going to run one, now's the > time. > > Thanks, Tom H. > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=241293#241293 > > > > > > > > > >


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:02:16 AM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: EIS Settings
    I think this is what I'm using. My float cal has drifted just a little over almost 500 hours though so I may re-work the numbers some day. 2SF 44 2OFF 119 3SF 47 3OFF 127 I/D DIIDII +/- +--+++ Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying do not archive McGANN, Ron wrote: > Hi guys, > > For those using GRTs EIS 6000 for displaying L/R fuel amount, could I > trouble someone to pass on their AUXSF and AUXOFF settings so I can > confirm my configuration?? > > Thanks in advance > Ron > VH-XRM > flying phase 1 > > "Warning: > The information contained in this email and any attached files is > confidential to BAE Systems Australia. If you are not the intended > recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this email or any > attachments is expressly prohibited. If you have received this email > in error, please notify us immediately. VIRUS: Every care has been > taken to ensure this email and its attachments are virus free, > however, any loss or damage incurred in using this email is not the > sender's responsibility. It is your responsibility to ensure virus > checks are completed before installing any data sent in this email to > your computer." > > > * > > > *


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:06:43 AM PST US
    From: Jesse Saint <jesse@saintaviation.com>
    Subject: Re: Dual static line runs?
    I have not seen the need for 2 static lines. If you are worried about it, you can put your Auto Pilot closest to the static port in your routing, then your EFIS, then your backup instruments. do not archive Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. jesse@saintaviation.com Cell: 352-427-0285 Fax: 815-377-3694 On Apr 26, 2009, at 7:37 AM, tomhanaway wrote: > > Trutrak suggests that a large # of demands on static line may cause > lag in auto pilot. Their suggestion is to run two static lines > forward to panel IF this occurs. > > My current panel is two AFS 4500's, one AFS 3400, 2&1/4" backup > altimeter and airspeed, trutrak adi and vsvg2 autopilot , and 430w > garmin stack for demands on static line. > > Has anyone actually found a need for a second static line (still > using just the original two static ports) or is one sufficient? > > I'd like to avoid second line but if I'm going to run one, now's > the time. > > Thanks, > Tom H. > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=241293#241293 > >


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:29:02 AM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: Dual static line runs?
    I'd keep the altimeter and air data instruments closest in all cases if you find any issues. Knowing the correct altitude on an IMC approach is more important than how quickly the autopilot reacts. But, I doubt you'd have a problem. Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying do not archive Jesse Saint wrote: > > I have not seen the need for 2 static lines. If you are worried about > it, you can put your Auto Pilot closest to the static port in your > routing, then your EFIS, then your backup instruments. > > do not archive > > Jesse Saint > Saint Aviation, Inc. > jesse@saintaviation.com > Cell: 352-427-0285 > Fax: 815-377-3694 > > On Apr 26, 2009, at 7:37 AM, tomhanaway wrote: > >> >> Trutrak suggests that a large # of demands on static line may cause >> lag in auto pilot. Their suggestion is to run two static lines >> forward to panel IF this occurs. >> >> My current panel is two AFS 4500's, one AFS 3400, 2&1/4" backup >> altimeter and airspeed, trutrak adi and vsvg2 autopilot , and 430w >> garmin stack for demands on static line. >> >> Has anyone actually found a need for a second static line (still using >> just the original two static ports) or is one sufficient? >> >> I'd like to avoid second line but if I'm going to run one, now's the >> time. >> >> Thanks, >> Tom H. >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=241293#241293 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:55:32 AM PST US
    From: "Rene Felker" <rene@felker.com>
    Subject: Dual static line runs?
    I agree with Tim and Jesse and have not seen a need for it. I also agree with Tim that I wonder if it even would do any good without another set of ports.....the tubing ID is so much bigger than the static port opening. I am not a fluid dynamics expert....but I did stay in a Condo in Park City Last night. I have the following off of may static system.... Backup altimeter Backup ADI Backup AS indicator Autopilot Grand Rapids EFIS Blue mountain EFIS AOA My autopilot works great.... Rene' Felker RV-10 N423CF Flying 801-721-6080 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tim Olson Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2009 7:24 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Dual static line runs? I'd keep the altimeter and air data instruments closest in all cases if you find any issues. Knowing the correct altitude on an IMC approach is more important than how quickly the autopilot reacts. But, I doubt you'd have a problem. Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying do not archive Jesse Saint wrote: > > I have not seen the need for 2 static lines. If you are worried about > it, you can put your Auto Pilot closest to the static port in your > routing, then your EFIS, then your backup instruments. > > do not archive > > Jesse Saint > Saint Aviation, Inc. > jesse@saintaviation.com > Cell: 352-427-0285 > Fax: 815-377-3694 > > On Apr 26, 2009, at 7:37 AM, tomhanaway wrote: > >> >> Trutrak suggests that a large # of demands on static line may cause >> lag in auto pilot. Their suggestion is to run two static lines >> forward to panel IF this occurs. >> >> My current panel is two AFS 4500's, one AFS 3400, 2&1/4" backup >> altimeter and airspeed, trutrak adi and vsvg2 autopilot , and 430w >> garmin stack for demands on static line. >> >> Has anyone actually found a need for a second static line (still using >> just the original two static ports) or is one sufficient? >> >> I'd like to avoid second line but if I'm going to run one, now's the >> time. >> >> Thanks, >> Tom H. >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=241293#241293 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:58:57 AM PST US
    From: "richard sipp" <rsipp@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: Dual static line runs?
    I would have to agree wtih Tim and Jesse, I also have multiple taps and all static related indications are very close. Dick Sipp N110DV 130 hours


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:14:15 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Dual static line runs?
    From: jim@CombsFive.Com
    That is weird. Is this specified in the manuals? There is no flow in either the static or the pitot system, only pressure. Very low pressures to boot. Is that something someone told you on the phone? really curious. Jim C "tomhanaway" <tomhanaway@comcast.net> Trutrak suggests that a large # of demands on static line may cause lag in auto pilot. Their suggestion is to run two static lines forward to panel IF this occurs. My current panel is two AFS 4500's, one AFS 3400, 2&1/4" backup altimeter and airspeed, trutrak adi and vsvg2 autopilot , and 430w garmin stack for demands on static line. Has anyone actually found a need for a second static line (still using just the original two static ports) or is one sufficient? I'd like to avoid second line but if I'm going to run one, now's the time. Thanks, Tom H. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=241293#241293 - The RV10-List Email Forum - Features Navigator to browse Un/Subscription, Chat, FAQ, --> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - available via the Web Forums! http://forums.matronics.com - List Contribution Web Site - generous support! Admin.


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:35:19 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Dual static line runs?
    From: "tomhanaway" <tomhanaway@comcast.net>
    Jim, actually in writing. Page 2 of the vsvg2 install manual (see below). Based on everyone's comments, it sounds like the single line has sufficient volume. I'm using the safeair 1 system. Thanks to all. One more "mental demon" put to rest. Tom Pitot and Static Connections All multi-servo TruTrak autopilots require connections to the pitot and static lines. The preferred method of this connection would be tee fittings near the aircrafts altimeter. The static line for the autopilot requires due care in its construction, as excessive lag or insufficient static orifices can cause the autopilot to oscillate (hunt) in pitch. Although there is compensation within the autopilot sufficient to handle moderate amounts of lag, the importance of a good static port and line cannot be overstated. In some cases problems can be caused by having a large number of devices (including the autopilot) connected to a single, insufficient, static port. In other cases, the static line itself is adequate but there are one or more devices connected to the same line, one of which has a large static reservoir. A simple remedy for this problem if it occurs is a tee-fitting near the static port, and a dedicated line to the autopilot only. Obviously, an insufficiently-large orifice coupled with large static reservoirs can aggravate the problems associated with lag. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=241355#241355


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:32:44 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Dual static line runs?
    From: jim@CombsFive.Com
    I am currently installing an VSGV DII and missed that statement. I could see where a older mechanical instrument might have a set of "Bellows" and that by itself could set up some pressure fluctuations. The newer electronic EFIS units depend on mems based pressure sensors and would not have any such devices. I have been focusing on the servo installation this weekend. The connections to the control unit will happen this week. Comment for anyone currently running wiring. Run ALL the wires you ever think you might need. Going back and adding them is NOT a fun process. Thanks Tom for the post. Jim Combs N312F Flying (Soon with autopilot!) --> RV10-List message posted by: "tomhanaway" <tomhanaway@comcast.net> Jim, actually in writing. Page 2 of the vsvg2 install manual (see below). Based on everyone's comments, it sounds like the single line has sufficient volume. I'm using the safeair 1 system. Thanks to all. One more "mental demon" put to rest. Tom Pitot and Static Connections All multi-servo TruTrak autopilots require connections to the pitot and static lines. The preferred method of this connection would be tee fittings near the aircraft&euro;&trade;s altimeter. The static line for the autopilot requires due care in its construction, as excessive lag or insufficient static orifices can cause the autopilot to oscillate (hunt) in pitch. Although there is compensation within the autopilot sufficient to handle moderate amounts of lag, the importance of a good static port and line cannot be overstated. In some cases problems can be caused by having a large number of devices (including the autopilot) connected to a single, insufficient, static port. In other cases, the static line itself is adequate but there are one or more devices connected to the same line, one of which has a large static reservoir. A simple remedy for this problem if it occurs is a tee-fitting near the static port, and a dedicated line to the autopilot only. Obviously, an insufficiently-large orifice coupled with large static reservoirs can aggravate the problems associated with lag. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=241355#241355 - The RV10-List Email Forum - Features Navigator to browse Un/Subscription, Chat, FAQ, --> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - available via the Web Forums! http://forums.matronics.com - List Contribution Web Site - generous support! Admin.




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv10-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV10-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv10-list
  • Browse RV10-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --