RV10-List Digest Archive

Sat 06/06/09


Total Messages Posted: 18



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 02:20 AM - Re: Sun visors (David Maib)
     2. 05:42 AM - Re: Glider flying, HuH!! (Bill Mauledriver Watson)
     3. 07:15 AM - Re: Glider flying, HuH!! (Lenny Iszak)
     4. 07:21 AM - Re: Re: Rudder/aileron Gust Lock (Rene Felker)
     5. 07:43 AM - Re: Rudder/aileron gust lock (curtis groote)
     6. 09:01 AM - Re: Heads Up On Wheel Pant Fiberglass Quality... (AirMike)
     7. 09:22 AM - Re: Heads Up On Wheel Pant Fiberglass Quality... (Matt Dralle)
     8. 10:16 AM - Re: Re: Dynon AP Flight Test (Andrew Johnson)
     9. 12:13 PM - Re: Dynon AP Flight Test (woxofswa)
    10. 12:57 PM - Re: Re: Rudder/aileron gust lock (Tim Olson)
    11. 01:27 PM - Door glass/windows (aerosport1)
    12. 01:37 PM - closing up the tailcone (James Ochs)
    13. 02:15 PM - Re: closing up the tailcone (Kelly McMullen)
    14. 03:09 PM - Re: Sam James Cowl (Thane States)
    15. 04:05 PM - Re: closing up the tailcone (James Ochs)
    16. 07:17 PM - Re: closing up the tailcone (Jim Berry)
    17. 07:30 PM - Re: Door glass/windows (Jim Berry)
    18. 07:43 PM - Re: Re: closing up the tailcone (Kelly McMullen)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:20:01 AM PST US
    From: David Maib <dmaib@mac.com>
    Subject: Re: Sun visors
    I went with the Blue Sky visors that Alex DeDominices sells on his site. http://www.aviationtechproducts.com/html/accessories.html I am very happy with them and they are almost $200 less than the Rosens. I think the Rosens are a bit more robust, but I think the size of the Blue Sky visors is perfect in the -10 David Maib 40559 On Jun 5, 2009, at 5:23 PM, Dave Leikam wrote: Can anyone recommend a good sun visor for the 10? There are several out there. Dave Leikam RV-10 #40496 N89DA Muskego, WI


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:42:51 AM PST US
    From: Bill Mauledriver Watson <MauleDriver@nc.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Glider flying, HuH!!
    that's what I thought it might be since I couldn't figure out how you could do that dive below redline. Having the ability to deploy at speeds up to redline can be very handy if venturing too close to a big western CuNimb. In fact, I'm not sure how else one gets away; redline or spoilers. Anyway, thanks again for the video. Beats gliding down mountains in those free fall suits. John Gonzalez wrote: > That was the alarm for the spoiler deployment with having the landing > gear down. What I find interesting is that they were flying at 120+ > knots with the spoilers open so that they could better follow the > terrain without building even more airspeed...but in my glider, I > believe it is prohibited to open or have open spoilers at that speed. > > > Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:16:54 -0400 > > From: MauleDriver@nc.rr.com > > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Glider flying, HuH!! > > > <MauleDriver@nc.rr.com> > > > > Great stuff! > > > > The audio set off my airsickness button though. I used to airsick so > > often when competing that the mere sound of the audio turns my stomach. > > > > Having said that, what was the other klaxon that went off when the dive > > down the valley started? Just not familiar with that sound. > > > > Thanks. > > > > John Gonzalez wrote: > >> Just thought you all might find this interesting. This is Mount > >> Whitney California, 14,500' ASL, where I soar almost every weekend in > >> the summer months. > >> > >> I am only sharing this, this is not me piloting the glider, nor am I > >> endorsing this type of flying. In soaring cross country, we are always > >> thinking about many things, like where to land if we can't make the > >> next airport, not getting into a box canyon where we cant get out, > >> where the lift is, what kind of lift etc. We often times are close to > >> terrain, but normally we don't put ourselves on purpose into this type > >> of gliding. Indeed, I have been in those canyons, albiet a little > >> higher, but trying to climb up and out, always having the ability to > >> glide down and out, but *altitude* is everything in soaring and IMO > >> should be in any flying. Anyway enjoy this crazy guy's adventure who > >> lived to see another day. I was flying in the area on that day, but > >> away from the overdevelopment you see in the video. > >> > >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjTmNJmJXbk > >> > >> John #409 faring in the gear fairings. > >> * > >> > >> > >> * > > > > <================== > > > > > > > * > > > *


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:15:41 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Glider flying, HuH!!
    From: "Lenny Iszak" <lenard@rapiddecision.com>
    Beats this? [Shocked] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27QHQVCtWts Lenny MauleDriver(at)nc.rr.com wrote: > that's what I thought it might be since I couldn't figure out how you > could do that dive below redline. > > Having the ability to deploy at speeds up to redline can be very handy > if venturing too close to a big western CuNimb. In fact, I'm not sure > how else one gets away; redline or spoilers. > > Anyway, thanks again for the video. Beats gliding down mountains in > those free fall suits. > > > Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=247080#247080


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:21:03 AM PST US
    From: "Rene Felker" <rene@felker.com>
    Subject: Re: Rudder/aileron Gust Lock
    Here is the gust lock I am using. Seems to work great. Light and small. http://www.aviationtechproducts.com/html/products_pics.html One or two items down the page. It is getting a workout here in Reno as I write this. Rene' Felker RV-10 N423CF Flying 801-721-6080 From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Don McDonald Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 12:00 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Rudder/aileron Gust Lock It's made of aluminum tubing.... the feet are dipped in a plastic bath.... and to use it as an aileron lock all you need is a short piece (6") of velcro.... wrap it around the gust lock and the stick. The spring loaded pin is there just so it can be stored as a shorter unit. You can put as many holes as you'd like, or just one that compresses the spring all the way. Because I needed one quickly, I also made a pvc unit. It worked well, but was heavy, bulky, and uglier than sh%&. I installed it today and then went to the back of the plane and shook the heck out of the rudder just to see if I could shake it loose.... no problem, it hung right in there. The other advantage is that you will NEVER be able to take off and forget to remove it..... no matter how oblivious you may be. Don --- On Fri, 6/5/09, lbgjb10 <lbgjb@gnt.net> wrote: From: lbgjb10 <lbgjb@gnt.net> Subject: RV10-List: Re: Rudder/aileron Gust Lock <http://us.mc05g.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=lbgjb@gnt.net> > also, what's it made of?? -------- Larry and Gayle N104LG Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/vie <http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=247030#247030> "http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List" sp;--> http://f <http://forums.matronics.com/> - List Contributionsp; &bsp;--> <http://www.matronics.com/contribution>


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:43:49 AM PST US
    From: curtis groote <cgroote1@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Rudder/aileron gust lock
    I've had a rudder lock (ATP) for some while now and it works great. -Howe ver, use caution when connecting it by a velcro strip to the stick for an a ileron lock. -In gentle or moderate winds/gusts it'll do okay, but if the re are significant gusts you'll find your whole contraption on the floor ha ving been loosened by the strong side force of the stick.=0A=0A=0A


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:01:03 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Heads Up On Wheel Pant Fiberglass Quality...
    From: "AirMike" <Mikeabel@Pacbell.net>
    Their Q/C seems to be inconsistent. Some parts are really good on my kit, some are mediocre, and some are awful - especially the wing root fairings. I saw a fellow EAA members doors a few weeks ago for a Lancair and I must say that the difference is dramatic. The Lancair parts are really high quality and very impressive. It is my impression from talking to Vans that pricing (keeping the kits reasonably priced) plays a big part in the operation. It is tough to argue with that philosophy, but you pay for it in wasted build time on crappy fiberglass parts. I guess that you always have to option to fabricate yourself or go to the Sam James cowl. -------- OSH '08 or Bust (busted) be there in &quot;09 Q/B Kit - FWF end game Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=247088#247088


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:22:40 AM PST US
    From: Matt Dralle <dralle@matronics.com>
    Subject: Re: Heads Up On Wheel Pant Fiberglass Quality...
    Well, the irony of "keeping the cost down" is that I personally would gladly pay twice as much for fiberglass kit parts, if they were of the finest quality possible. Oh, wait, I just DID pay twice for my wheel pants... :-) Seriously, though, we RV builders are Metal workers and pretty much all of us detest this fiberglass sillyness. If I wanted to work with fiberglass, I'd of built a Lancair. I think anything Van's can do to minimize the amount of fiberglass work (or rework as the case may be) is worth any incremental cost on their/our part. How much extra would you be willing to pay to simply take the cowling out of the box, for example, and just be able to bolt it on to the front of the fuselage and be done? I'd pay double the current price of that fiberglass part. Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV Finishing Up Wheel Pant, Digging Out The Wings... At 08:56 AM 6/6/2009 Saturday, you wrote: > >Their Q/C seems to be inconsistent. Some parts are really good on my kit, some are mediocre, and some are awful - especially the wing root fairings. I saw a fellow EAA members doors a few weeks ago for a Lancair and I must say that the difference is dramatic. The Lancair parts are really high quality and very impressive. It is my impression from talking to Vans that pricing (keeping the kits reasonably priced) plays a big part in the operation. It is tough to argue with that philosophy, but you pay for it in wasted build time on crappy fiberglass parts. I guess that you always have to option to fabricate yourself or go to the Sam James cowl. > >Read this topic online here: > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=247088#247088 >


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:16:24 AM PST US
    From: "Andrew Johnson" <noconwud@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: Dynon AP Flight Test
    Have you tested the Dynon system yet? I'm very curious to see how it works... Andy Johnson ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jesse Saint" <jesse@saintaviation.com> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 2:47 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Dynon AP Flight Test > > I believe they are always in the loop, but don't exercise any force > unless they are turned on. They do, however, have drag on the controls, > just like the TruTrak. I took out the TruTrak servos and installed the > Dynon servos for the testing, so I don't expect there would have been a > noticeable change. I haven't worked the controls without an autopilot > servo connected in a long time, so I can't help much there. They > certainly don't create a great deal of drag, but I would say they would > be equivalent to the TruTrak. > > Jesse Saint > Saint Aviation, Inc. > jesse@saintaviation.com > Cell: 352-427-0285 > Fax: 815-377-3694 > > On Jun 4, 2009, at 2:24 PM, Bob Turner wrote: > >> >> Are the dynon servos always in the control loop, like the TruTrak's, or >> do they have a release clutch, like the Trio? If the former, could you >> detect any change in control pressures before and after installation? >> >> -------- >> Bob Turner >> RV-10 QB >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=246806#246806 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:13:03 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Dynon AP Flight Test
    From: "woxofswa" <woxof@aol.com>
    Thanks for the update. I am right at the pitch servo mount stage. Did you manufacture your own or did you find a ready made piece that worked? TIA -------- Myron Nelson Mesa, AZ Emp completed, legacy build fuse in progress Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=247104#247104


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:57:30 PM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: Rudder/aileron gust lock
    I'd stick with the seat belts to secure the ailerons. (Actually it's good for the elevator too. I'm a little leery of the spring loaded rudder gust locks because if it isn't a locked-in-place setup, the wind could blow the gust lock compressed and then it could pop out. I've known people parked in 40+ mph winds that had problems in the past. So a solid locking method would be good. My gust lock isn't pretty, but with an added strap from the fork to the stick, I am able to neutralize the ailerons, provide a solid lock to the rudders, and neutralize the elevator too. It could be built prettier, but I really like the function. Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD curtis groote wrote: > I've had a rudder lock (ATP) for some while now and it works great. > However, use caution when connecting it by a velcro strip to the stick > for an aileron lock. In gentle or moderate winds/gusts it'll do okay, > but if there are significant gusts you'll find your whole contraption on > the floor having been loosened by the strong side force of the stick. >


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:27:30 PM PST US
    Subject: Door glass/windows
    From: "aerosport1" <g.combs@aerosportmodeling.com>
    I am in the process of installing my windows in the doors and the windows are .165 to .1875 thick and do not fit the window channel. They are almost .04 to .060 to thick. It seems that these should be the same thickness as the rear windows which were .120 to .140. Has anyone else had this issue? If I try to sand down the shelf the window sits on I will sand almost or will go through the external door skin. At this thickness there would be no good way to blend these into the outer door skins. Geoff -------- Geoff Combs RV-10 QB N829GW Finishing Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=247108#247108


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:37:32 PM PST US
    From: James Ochs <jochs@froody.org>
    Subject: closing up the tailcone
    Hi all, I'm getting to the point of starting to rivet the tailcone and I want to put in all the necessary stuff for pulling wires/tubes, etc as early as possible. I have a big roll of innerduct like Tim O used, and I'd like to get that in place now. I'm not so concerned about the battery area stuff since it's right at the front of the tailcone, but I'd prefer not to be crawling around inside it later... so if someone could point me to some pics (or text) of the following items, I'd appreciate it. 1) How does the tail strobe wiring (and electric trim wiring) get from the tailcone to the rudder? The rear spar on the VS is solid and so is the rear bulkhead on the tailcone, and once through that how do you get it into the rudder in a way that is not going to create stress on the wires when the rudder moves? I'm also considering a camera in the top of the VS, are there any issues with securing the fiberglass bits with nutplates and screws rather than riveting it on? 2) On the static plumbing I understand the recommended method is to go up from one static port, over the top, hit a T with the plumbing going forward and then continue down to the other static port. Is it better to run the plumbing forward on the right or left side or does it matter? I also noticed there are a series of small holes arcing over the top in the bulkhead closest to the static ports... can I use those for securing the static line with zip-ties or do they serve some purpose that I am not aware of? Also, someone asked me a question that I hadn't thought about which was "are you going to put a drain in the static line?" and I didn't have an answer... what is your opinion on that? I'm using the safeair1 system with the alternate static option if that matters. 3) Is there any other wiring/plumbing or anything else that needs to go to the back of the tailcone? Antennas, etc? If I am putting antennas back there then do the antenna wires need to be kept separate from the other wires for any reason? Are there some recommendations on where to put doublers in now even if I don't have the antenna(e)? 4) As far as putting foam down for sound proofing, is there any needed in the tailcone, or does that all go into the cabin area? 5) Lastly, I've been looking through the archives and trying to look at the plans but I am not totally clear on where the rudder cables run and I don't want to put the inner duct through a lightening hole if that is where my rudder cable is going to go... where is it safe to run that stuff? Also, I don't really want to go randomly making new holes without knowing that its not going to affect the structural integrity Apologies if this has all been hashed and re-hashed already, I'm just not finding the answers ;) Thanks, James


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:15:06 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: closing up the tailcone
    From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2@gmail.com>
    IMHO, you are worrying too much about getting stuff in early. You will need someone to crawl in to rivet the top skin to the ribs anyway. It isn't that long a reach. Just closed mine in a few weeks ago. Other than riveting the static ports in place, I just followed the plans. On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 1:25 PM, James Ochs <jochs@froody.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm getting to the point of starting to rivet the tailcone and I want to > put in all the necessary stuff for pulling wires/tubes, etc as early as > possible. I have a big roll of innerduct like Tim O used, and I'd like to > get that in place now. I'm not so concerned about the battery area stuff > since it's right at the front of the tailcone, but I'd prefer not to be > crawling around inside it later... so if someone could point me to some pics > (or text) of the following items, I'd appreciate it. > > 1) How does the tail strobe wiring (and electric trim wiring) get from the > tailcone to the rudder? The rear spar on the VS is solid and so is the rear > bulkhead on the tailcone, and once through that how do you get it into the > rudder in a way that is not going to create stress on the wires when the > rudder moves? I'm also considering a camera in the top of the VS, are there > any issues with securing the fiberglass bits with nutplates and screws > rather than riveting it on? > > 2) On the static plumbing I understand the recommended method is to go up > from one static port, over the top, hit a T with the plumbing going forward > and then continue down to the other static port. Is it better to run the > plumbing forward on the right or left side or does it matter? I also > noticed there are a series of small holes arcing over the top in the > bulkhead closest to the static ports... can I use those for securing the > static line with zip-ties or do they serve some purpose that I am not aware > of? Also, someone asked me a question that I hadn't thought about which was > "are you going to put a drain in the static line?" and I didn't have an > answer... what is your opinion on that? I'm using the safeair1 system with > the alternate static option if that matters. > > 3) Is there any other wiring/plumbing or anything else that needs to go to > the back of the tailcone? Antennas, etc? If I am putting antennas back > there then do the antenna wires need to be kept separate from the other > wires for any reason? Are there some recommendations on where to put > doublers in now even if I don't have the antenna(e)? > > 4) As far as putting foam down for sound proofing, is there any needed in > the tailcone, or does that all go into the cabin area? > > 5) Lastly, I've been looking through the archives and trying to look at the > plans but I am not totally clear on where the rudder cables run and I don't > want to put the inner duct through a lightening hole if that is where my > rudder cable is going to go... where is it safe to run that stuff? Also, I > don't really want to go randomly making new holes without knowing that its > not going to affect the structural integrity > > Apologies if this has all been hashed and re-hashed already, I'm just not > finding the answers ;) > > Thanks, > James > >


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:09:27 PM PST US
    From: "Thane States" <thane2@comporium.net>
    Subject: Re: Sam James Cowl
    I have to agree with all the comments about the James cowl and plenum install. I would have to say that I do have a solid 180 kts. airplane, but I don't know if the advertised speed gains are valid from James. I also have the James wheel pants. The install of the cowl was as easy as Vans except when it came to fabricating the airbox from scratch. But like Robin I did not have to modify the clean look of the cowl intake. The plenum was as Deems said very rough and needed a great deal of mods and re-work. I would go the same route again if not for a better looking cowl, but the possibility of some added speed. I have had no cooling issues. Oil temp 180's, all CHT's in the 350's- 380's. Now when the temps in the south come up I will have a little higher temps in the climb, but still able to cool it down in cruise. BTW, I am running the BPE. 540; 288 hp.CAI. and love the power and smoothness. Great engine. Thane States 65 hrs. flown ----- Original Message ----- From: pilotdds@aol.com To: rv10-list@matronics.com Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 2:12 PM Subject: RV10-List: Sam James Cowl Looking for feedback from those of you flying with the James cowl.Specificaly how hard was the install,how are the oil temps and where did you mount the oil cooler.Would you do it again? Thanks-Jim -----Original Message----- From: fixitauto@aol.com To: rv10-list@matronics.com Sent: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 5:33 am Subject: Re: RV10-List: Dynon Autopilot Jesse What did you use for pitch control servo mounting brackets? -----Original Message----- From: Jesse Saint <jesse@saintaviation.com> To: rv10-list@matronics.com Sent: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 7:51 pm Subject: RV10-List: Dynon Autopilot For those who will be going with a more budget-level panel and might be considering a Dynon EFIS and Autopilot, I just installed the Dynon servos today and will be test flying it tomorrow. I will report on how well it handles the plane, especially compared to the TruTrak line that I am very familiar with. The installation of the servos was very simple and the wiring was even easier. I am impressed so far. Now we'll see how it flies. Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. jesse@saintaviation.com Cell: 352-427-0285 Fax: 815-377-3694 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Wanna slim down for summer? Go to America Takes it Off to learn how. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Wanna slim down for summer? Go to America Takes it Off to learn how.


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:05:11 PM PST US
    From: James Ochs <jochs@froody.org>
    Subject: Re: closing up the tailcone
    Heh, you are probably right... it's just how I am. I just figure it's better to get it all done now and have to crawl in once to button up the top than to have to drag a bunch of drills, rivet guns and whatever else down there half a dozen times, especially if I have to make any big holes for the innerduct or try to rivet doubler plates in the bottom skin, both of which I think are much more easily done now than when I'm squeezed into a space that's too tight for me to begin with. do not archive thanks, James On Jun 6, 2009, at 2:11 PM, Kelly McMullen wrote: > IMHO, you are worrying too much about getting stuff in early. You > will need someone to crawl in to rivet the top skin to the ribs > anyway. It isn't that long a reach. Just closed mine in a few weeks > ago. Other than riveting the static ports in place, I just followed > the plans. > > On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 1:25 PM, James Ochs <jochs@froody.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm getting to the point of starting to rivet the tailcone and I > want to put in all the necessary stuff for pulling wires/tubes, etc > as early as possible. I have a big roll of innerduct like Tim O > used, and I'd like to get that in place now. I'm not so concerned > about the battery area stuff since it's right at the front of the > tailcone, but I'd prefer not to be crawling around inside it > later... so if someone could point me to some pics (or text) of the > following items, I'd appreciate it. > > 1) How does the tail strobe wiring (and electric trim wiring) get > from the tailcone to the rudder? The rear spar on the VS is solid > and so is the rear bulkhead on the tailcone, and once through that > how do you get it into the rudder in a way that is not going to > create stress on the wires when the rudder moves? I'm also > considering a camera in the top of the VS, are there any issues with > securing the fiberglass bits with nutplates and screws rather than > riveting it on? > > 2) On the static plumbing I understand the recommended method is to > go up from one static port, over the top, hit a T with the plumbing > going forward and then continue down to the other static port. Is > it better to run the plumbing forward on the right or left side or > does it matter? I also noticed there are a series of small holes > arcing over the top in the bulkhead closest to the static ports... > can I use those for securing the static line with zip-ties or do > they serve some purpose that I am not aware of? Also, someone asked > me a question that I hadn't thought about which was "are you going > to put a drain in the static line?" and I didn't have an answer... > what is your opinion on that? I'm using the safeair1 system with > the alternate static option if that matters. > > 3) Is there any other wiring/plumbing or anything else that needs to > go to the back of the tailcone? Antennas, etc? If I am putting > antennas back there then do the antenna wires need to be kept > separate from the other wires for any reason? Are there some > recommendations on where to put doublers in now even if I don't have > the antenna(e)? > > 4) As far as putting foam down for sound proofing, is there any > needed in the tailcone, or does that all go into the cabin area? > > 5) Lastly, I've been looking through the archives and trying to look > at the plans but I am not totally clear on where the rudder cables > run and I don't want to put the inner duct through a lightening hole > if that is where my rudder cable is going to go... where is it safe > to run that stuff? Also, I don't really want to go randomly making > new holes without knowing that its not going to affect the > structural integrity > > Apologies if this has all been hashed and re-hashed already, I'm > just not finding the answers ;) > > Thanks, > James > > ========== > arget="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > ========== > http://forums.matronics.com > ========== > le, List Admin. > ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > ========== > >


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:17:33 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: closing up the tailcone
    From: "Jim Berry" <jimberry@qwest.net>
    James, Kelly is right, it is not a big deal. But there are some things you could do now to save a little crawling around later. Everything I suggest below can/should be done after the tail cone is riveted, but before the tail cone is riveted to the fuselage. I ran 2 parallel lengths of duct from the bulkhead just aft of the baggage bulkhead to the bulkhead just forward of the aft-most bulkhead. Sorry I can't reference part numbers, but I am not near my plans. One duct would have been adequate. Install a pull cord in every duct.Generally there is no need to separate strobe or antenna wiring , assuming you use quality coax and proper technique. The rudder cables run through the bottom of each bulkhead, so they do not interfere with wiring. Later on Van's will have you drill a hole through the aft bulkhead and VS spar for the tail strobe and nav light wiring. If you want a static drain port, the tail cone is probably not the place. You want it at the low point of your static plumbing, and easily accessible. If you want your strobe power pack and/or elt mounted in the tail cone, I would install the mounting brackets now. If you want antennas mounted in your tail cone I would install the doublers now while you have easy access to both sides of the skins(especially if you rivet without a helper). As far as riveting the tail cone, I would recommend back riveting the top 3 J-channels to the top aft skin before riveting the skin to the bulkheads(to eliminate smileys in a very visible skin). I was able to back rivet my entire tail cone, with the exception of about a dozen of the most aft rivets. If I recall Deems liked that method, but Kelly did not. If you decide to buck the rivets, some people have found it easier to suspend the tail cone from the ceiling, big end down. That way your bucking partner can stand inside the cone, rather than crawl around inside. When you get the tail cone riveted to the rest of the fuselage, you are going to discover that in spite of your planning you are going to have to crawl in the tail cone for something anyway. A couple of 2 x 6's about 3 feet long, placed on the bottom of the bulkheads will give you enough support to crawl all the way back. Jim Berry 40482 Getting ready for the DAR. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=247143#247143


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:30:57 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Door glass/windows
    From: "Jim Berry" <jimberry@qwest.net>
    Geoff, Other than smoothing the outer face of the window channel, I would not remove any material trying to make the outer face of the window flush with the door. Most/all of the window edge will stand proud of the door. I think most people have found more variability with the rear windows i.e. in some places the window is proud(high) and in other places the cabin top is proud. Welcome to the world of body working Van's quality fiberglass products to make it all pretty. Flox, micro and hours of sanding will bring it all to the same level(eventually). Jim Berry 40482 N15JB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=247146#247146


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:43:02 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: closing up the tailcone
    From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2@gmail.com>
    I did back rivet the stiffeners to the top aft skin. That was super. I did not back rivet the ribs to the top skin. Those were bucked, which worked very nicely, other than bucker having to crawl in. I lined bottom skin with a sleeping bag and a piece of plywood to protect stuff. Most of the rest of tail cone was back riveted except for longerons which I did with pneumatic squeezer. On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Jim Berry <jimberry@qwest.net> wrote: > > > As far as riveting the tail cone, I would recommend back riveting the top > 3 J-channels to the top aft skin before riveting the skin to the > bulkheads(to eliminate smileys in a very visible skin). I was able to back > rivet my entire tail cone, with the exception of about a dozen of the most > aft rivets. If I recall Deems liked that method, but Kelly did not. \<http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List> >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv10-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV10-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv10-list
  • Browse RV10-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --