Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 07:54 AM - Heater Boxes / Firewall Sealer (Perry, Phil)
     2. 08:22 AM - Re: Heater Boxes / Firewall Sealer (dogsbark@comcast.net)
     3. 08:22 AM - Re: Heater Boxes / Firewall Sealer (Pascal)
     4. 08:25 AM - Re: Heater Boxes / Firewall Sealer (Seano)
     5. 08:54 AM - Re: Ice (Strasnuts)
     6. 09:12 AM - Re: Heater Boxes / Firewall Sealer (nukeflyboy)
     7. 09:43 AM - Re: Heater Boxes / Firewall Sealer (Pascal)
     8. 11:45 AM - Re: Re: Ice (David McNeill)
     9. 07:01 PM - Fuel Flow Transducer Move (Michael Kraus)
    10. 09:26 PM - Re: Heater Boxes / Firewall Sealer (AirMike)
    11. 09:50 PM - Re: Re: Heater Boxes / Firewall Sealer (Pascal)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Heater Boxes / Firewall Sealer | 
      
      I installed my aluminum heater boxes and even held them into position
      with proseal - per the plans.
      
      
      Now I'm having second thoughts for a couple of reasons.
      
      1)      They're aluminum and should they melt, there is a great hole to
      blast a fire up the tunnel and over the fuel.
      
      2)      The proseal has a flashpoint of ~200 degrees.
      
      
      I plan on popping these boxes off and replacing with stainless boxes.
      
      
      Q) What material did you use to seal them?  I could use Red RTV, but I'm
      thinking firewall sealer (brand?) is a better option.  
      
      
      I'm also thinking of installing a thermal barrier between the boxes and
      the firewall.  Maybe just a bed of firewall sealer, or a box-sized
      square of thermal insulation.
      
      
      Q) Anyone else do that?
      
      
      Thanks,
      
      Phil
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Heater Boxes / Firewall Sealer | 
      
      
      Phil, 
      
      
      The stainless boxes I installed came with a small tube of sealer that was r
      ated to 1,600 degrees.=C2- I think some RTV is rated to 600 degrees.=C2
      - Can't remember what firewall proseal is rated, but all of these are bet
      ter than regular proseal. 
      
      
      Don't forget to install the two nutplates on the heater boxes for the cable
      s before installation. 
      
      
      Sean Blair 
      
      COS 
      
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "Phil Perry" <Phil.Perry@netapp.com> 
      Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 8:53:22 AM GMT -07:00 US/Canada Mountai
      n 
      Subject: RV10-List: Heater Boxes / Firewall Sealer 
      
      
      I installed my aluminum heater boxes and even held them into position with 
      proseal =93 per the plans. 
      
      
      Now I=99m having second thoughts for a couple of reasons. 
      
      1) =C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2- They=99re aluminum and should they 
      melt, there is a great hole to blast a fire up the tunnel and over the fuel
      . 
      
      2) =C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2- The proseal has a flashpoint of ~200 degr
      ees. 
      
      
      I plan on popping these boxes off and replacing with stainless boxes. 
      
      
      Q) What material did you use to seal them?=C2- I could use Red RTV, but I
      =99m thinking firewall sealer (brand?) is a better option. =C2- 
      
      
      I=99m also thinking of installing a thermal barrier between the boxes
       and the firewall.=C2- Maybe just a bed of firewall sealer, or a box-size
      d square of thermal insulation. 
      
      
      Q) Anyone else do that? 
      
      
      Thanks, 
      
      Phil 
      
      
      ==
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Heater Boxes / Firewall Sealer | 
      
      Phil; A couple of weeks ago we went through a thread on the benefits of 
      SS. I mentioned for the exact reason you covered that having SS is a 
      good investment. 
      To save you the time- http://www.planeinnovations.com/new%20heater.htm.  
       The heater bypass comes with a seal so you don't need to worry about 
      RTV.
      I have a pair and it's a great product!
      Pascal
      
      
      From: Perry, Phil 
      Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 7:53 AM
      Subject: RV10-List: Heater Boxes / Firewall Sealer
      
      
      I installed my aluminum heater boxes and even held them into position 
      with proseal - per the plans.
      
      
      Now I'm having second thoughts for a couple of reasons.
      
      1)      They're aluminum and should they melt, there is a great hole to 
      blast a fire up the tunnel and over the fuel.
      
      2)      The proseal has a flashpoint of ~200 degrees.
      
      
      I plan on popping these boxes off and replacing with stainless boxes.
      
      
      Q) What material did you use to seal them?  I could use Red RTV, but I'm 
      thinking firewall sealer (brand?) is a better option.  
      
      
      I'm also thinking of installing a thermal barrier between the boxes and 
      the firewall.  Maybe just a bed of firewall sealer, or a box-sized 
      square of thermal insulation.
      
      
      Q) Anyone else do that?
      
      
      Thanks,
      
      Phil
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Heater Boxes / Firewall Sealer | 
      
      I just used the sealant that comes with the stainless parts from plane 
      innovations.
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Perry, Phil 
        To: rv10-list@matronics.com 
        Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 8:53 AM
        Subject: RV10-List: Heater Boxes / Firewall Sealer
      
      
        I installed my aluminum heater boxes and even held them into position 
      with proseal - per the plans.
      
         
      
        Now I'm having second thoughts for a couple of reasons.
      
        1)      They're aluminum and should they melt, there is a great hole 
      to blast a fire up the tunnel and over the fuel.
      
        2)      The proseal has a flashpoint of ~200 degrees.
      
         
      
        I plan on popping these boxes off and replacing with stainless boxes.
      
         
      
        Q) What material did you use to seal them?  I could use Red RTV, but 
      I'm thinking firewall sealer (brand?) is a better option.  
      
         
      
        I'm also thinking of installing a thermal barrier between the boxes 
      and the firewall.  Maybe just a bed of firewall sealer, or a box-sized 
      square of thermal insulation.
      
         
      
        Q) Anyone else do that?
      
         
      
        Thanks,
      
        Phil
      
         
      
         
      
         
      
         
      
         
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      You probably won't like my answer since my 10 is not flying, but knowing if a plane
      (not made for icing) does kind of okay is probably best not knowing.  There
      have been several Cirrus aircraft that was legal for inadvertent icing encounter
      and crashed from it.  Now the new Cirrus are certified for known icing.
      I fly a Citation Jet for a company and maybe I don't know enough but you never
      can tell how much ice is going to accumulate on the aircraft.  I personally
      believe it is a very hard question to answer and to try not to get in icing. 
      If you think the plane will do okay in it, it may persuade you to stay in it.
      Having said all of that I have been in icing in a plane not made for it.  I got
      out of it as soon as I could.
      
      --------
      Cust. #40936
      RV-10 SB Fuselage
      N801VR reserved
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=264537#264537
      
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Heater Boxes / Firewall Sealer | 
      
      
      I used a thick (1/8 in) silicone gasket under the heater box.  This idea came from
      Tim (I think) as an unverified way to minimize heat transfer into the tunnel.
      Sounded like a good idea.
      
      Since the sealant is not part of the fire barrier per se, I don't think it matters
      a lot.  High temp RTV should work fine.
      
      --------
      Dave Moore
      RV-6 flying
      RV-10 QB - cabin top/fiberglass hell
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=264542#264542
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Heater Boxes / Firewall Sealer | 
      
      Mine came with the attachments, I think Paul updated them. Call Paul at 
      Plane innovations and ask him.
      
      
      From: dogsbark@comcast.net 
      Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 8:19 AM
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Heater Boxes / Firewall Sealer
      
      
      Phil,
      
      
      The stainless boxes I installed came with a small tube of sealer that 
      was rated to 1,600 degrees.  I think some RTV is rated to 600 degrees.  
      Can't remember what firewall proseal is rated, but all of these are 
      better than regular proseal.
      
      
      Don't forget to install the two nutplates on the heater boxes for the 
      cables before installation.
      
      
      Sean Blair
      
      COS
      
      
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "Phil Perry" <Phil.Perry@netapp.com>
      Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 8:53:22 AM GMT -07:00 US/Canada 
      Mountain
      Subject: RV10-List: Heater Boxes / Firewall Sealer
      
      
      I installed my aluminum heater boxes and even held them into position 
      with proseal =93 per the plans.
      
      
      Now I=99m having second thoughts for a couple of reasons.
      
      1)      They=99re aluminum and should they melt, there is a great 
      hole to blast a fire up the tunnel and over the fuel.
      
      2)      The proseal has a flashpoint of ~200 degrees.
      
      
      I plan on popping these boxes off and replacing with stainless boxes.
      
      
      Q) What material did you use to seal them?  I could use Red RTV, but 
      I=99m thinking firewall sealer (brand?) is a better option.  
      
      
      I=99m also thinking of installing a thermal barrier between the 
      boxes and the firewall.  Maybe just a bed of firewall sealer, or a 
      box-sized square of thermal insulation.
      
      
      Q) Anyone else do that?
      
      
      Thanks,
      
      Phil
      
      
      get=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
      p://forums.matronics.com
      blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      Having flown a Cessna in the Midwest (OK,MO,IL,IN) during  all seasons. One
      sets some ground rules. If one is going to fly during the winter in the
      Midwest the aircraft is going to accept minimal icing or accept some very
      hazardous VFR underneath. My rules are no continuous flight in icing
      conditions. No flight near freezing rain. I do accept that I may have to
      endure 3-5 minutes of climb in IMC to get on top. I may have to accept 3-5
      minutes of ice on the approach. Of course the approach must be certainty
      (well above minimums). I also refuse clearances that will take me into icing
      until I am ready. SGF approach once offered a lower altitude at 30NM out. My
      then current temperature was a +2C and the SGF surface temperature was -8C.
      I refused the descent until vectored and cleared for the ILS approach about
      7NM out). At 120KIAS to the marker and then 90KIAS, my exposure to ice would
      be about 4 minutes. Conditions on the surface were 500 and 2. Yes I picked
      up some ice during the approach but the runway was long the approach speed
      was +20KIAS above normal landing speed. I now live in the mountainous west
      where MEAs are very high and would guarantee icing in IMC except for a few
      summer months. The rules out here are VFR underneath unless the freezing
      levels are above freezing at the planned altitude.
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Strasnuts
      Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 8:54 AM
      Subject: RV10-List: Re: Ice
      
      
      You probably won't like my answer since my 10 is not flying, but knowing if
      a plane (not made for icing) does kind of okay is probably best not knowing.
      There have been several Cirrus aircraft that was legal for inadvertent icing
      encounter and crashed from it.  Now the new Cirrus are certified for known
      icing.  I fly a Citation Jet for a company and maybe I don't know enough but
      you never can tell how much ice is going to accumulate on the aircraft.  I
      personally believe it is a very hard question to answer and to try not to
      get in icing.  If you think the plane will do okay in it, it may persuade
      you to stay in it.  Having said all of that I have been in icing in a plane
      not made for it.  I got out of it as soon as I could.
      
      --------
      Cust. #40936
      RV-10 SB Fuselage
      N801VR reserved
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=264537#264537
      
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Fuel Flow Transducer Move | 
      
      
      For those that moved the fuel flow transducer between the servo and  
      the spider, how and where exactly did you mount it?  Pictures would be  
      even better!
      
      Thanks
      -Mike Kraus
      RV-4 Flying
      RV-10 FWF and Wiring
      
      Sent from my iPhone
      
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Heater Boxes / Firewall Sealer | 
      
      
      Another vote here for Paul at:
      
       http://www.planeinnovations.com/new%20wheelpant.htm
      
      Paul is great and VERY helpful. I consider the heater valves a must option
      
      --------
      OSH '10 or Bust 
      Q/B Kit - phase 1
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=264663#264663
      
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Heater Boxes / Firewall Sealer | 
      
      
      Have these too! I know the manufacturer of these personally and he makes 
      quality products. Think there was a hinge cover in development, waiting for 
      my order to arrive but I think I'll be equally happy with that product as 
      well.
      Pascal
      
      --------------------------------------------------
      From: "AirMike" <Mikeabel@Pacbell.net>
      Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 9:26 PM
      Subject: RV10-List: Re: Heater Boxes / Firewall Sealer
      
      >
      > Another vote here for Paul at:
      >
      > http://www.planeinnovations.com/new%20wheelpant.htm
      >
      > Paul is great and VERY helpful. I consider the heater valves a must option
      >
      > --------
      > OSH '10 or Bust
      > Q/B Kit - phase 1
      >
      >
      > Read this topic online here:
      >
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=264663#264663
      >
      >
      > 
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |