Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:24 AM - Re: Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move (Patrick Thyssen)
     2. 12:36 AM - Re: Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move (Patrick Thyssen)
     3. 05:13 AM - Re: Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move (Don McDonald)
     4. 06:27 AM - Re: Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move (William Curtis)
     5. 07:12 AM - Re: Window trim - inside (Marcus Cooper)
     6. 07:13 AM - Re: Chargers ...... and batteries (RV Builder (Michael Sausen))
     7. 07:13 AM - Re: Chargers (RV Builder (Michael Sausen))
     8. 08:08 AM - Re: Chargers (RV Builder (Michael Sausen))
     9. 08:10 AM - Re: Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move (RV Builder (Michael Sausen))
    10. 08:12 AM - Re: Chargers (David McNeill)
    11. 08:30 AM - Door hinges (Chris Hukill)
    12. 08:59 AM - Re: Chargers (David McNeill)
    13. 09:11 AM - Re: Door hinges (Pascal)
    14. 09:34 AM - Re: Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move (Tim Olson)
    15. 09:34 AM - Re: Chargers (Linn Walters)
    16. 09:34 AM - Re: Chargers (Tim Olson)
    17. 09:41 AM - Re: Door hinges (Les Kearney)
    18. 10:08 AM - Re: Door hinges (Les Kearney)
    19. 10:18 AM - Re: Door hinges (Jeff Carpenter)
    20. 10:34 AM - Re: Chargers (David McNeill)
    21. 10:39 AM - Re: Door hinges (Bob Turner)
    22. 10:40 AM - Chargers (David McNeill)
    23. 11:39 AM - 12248 (David McNeill)
    24. 11:39 AM - Re: Chargers (RV Builder (Michael Sausen))
    25. 11:40 AM - Flap positioning system (Kelly McMullen)
    26. 11:42 AM - Re: Flap positioning system (Condrey, Bob (US SSA))
    27. 12:04 PM - Re: Flap positioning system (Rick Sked)
    28. 12:05 PM - Re: Flap positioning system (Tim Olson)
    29. 12:12 PM - Re: Chargers (David McNeill)
    30. 12:20 PM - Re: Flap positioning system (John Cumins)
    31. 12:39 PM - Re: Flap positioning system (Kelly McMullen)
    32. 12:51 PM - Re: Flap positioning system (Rene Felker)
    33. 01:11 PM - Re: Flap positioning system (Tim Olson)
    34. 01:11 PM - Re: Chargers (Robin Marks)
    35. 01:21 PM - chargers (David McNeill)
    36. 01:22 PM - Re: Chargers (Brian)
    37. 01:41 PM - Re: Flap positioning system (Condrey, Bob (US SSA))
    38. 03:41 PM - G-900 fees, dues, subscriptions ()
    39. 06:25 PM - Re: G-900 fees, dues, subscriptions (Robin Marks)
    40. 07:54 PM - Re: G-900 fees, dues, subscriptions (Dave Leikam)
    41. 08:13 PM - Re: G-900 fees, dues, subscriptions (Tim Olson)
    42. 08:13 PM - Re: Flap positioning system (John Gonzalez)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move | 
      
      That big old red hose goes to, you guessed it, the fuel pump on another eng
      ine I changed on a super Decath this year. There must be a reason for these
       things.
      -So I might think about putting a good cooling hose to help out on coolin
      g fuel.
      Patrick Thyssen
      
      --- On Thu, 9/24/09, Patrick Thyssen <jump2@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
      
      From: Patrick Thyssen <jump2@sbcglobal.net>
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move
      
      One thing I have just thought about and correct me if I'm wrong. From the f
      uel pump to the fuel pressure sending unit is up hill or above the fuel pum
      p. This being said if you get air in your hoses going to your pressure tran
      sducer from- being hot [vapor] then you could have a problem as to what i
      t is reporting.
      By having a compression of air instead of solid liquid.
      -Lets hear from the engineers.
      
      Patrick Thyssen
      Engine pickled again!!! for new instrument panel
      -Oh how I love OP
      
      --- On Thu, 9/24/09, McGann, Ron <Ron.McGann@thalesgroup.com.au> wrote:
      
      From: McGann, Ron <Ron.McGann@thalesgroup.com.au>
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Fuel Flow Transducer=0A Move
      
      au>
      
      Only 40 hours but same experience as Marcus.- Only irregluarity comes
      when the boost pump is engaged but the totaliser function always appears
      to reflect remaining fuel to within a gallon or so.
      
      Ron McGann
      
      Head of Engineering
      Security Solutions & Services
      Aerospace
      
      Tel: +61 2 9562 3530 | Mob: +61 (0) 466 655 393 | Fax: +61 2 9562 2100
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Cooper
      Sent: Friday, 25 September 2009 2:45 AM
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move
      
      
      I have about 430 hours with the transducer in the plans location.- No
      real
      issues although I do notice a slight FF drop when I turn the boost pump
      off.
      So far it has been very accurate and consistent.
      
      Marcus
      40286
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Nick Leonard
      Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 12:05 PM
      Subject: RV10-List: Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move
      
      
      As an informal survey for the rest of us, it would be interesting to get
      feedback from those that have left it where Van's originally suggested.
      Are
      any of you having any trouble with the transducer in=0A that location?
      
      How many people have moved the unit=0A because of inaccurate readings or
      other
      problems?
      
      --------
      Nick Leonard
      RV-10 (40015) Finish
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=264706#264706
      
      
      DISCLAIMER:----------------------------------------------------------------
      -----------
      This e-mail transmission and any documents, files and previous e-mail messa
      ges
      attached to it are private and confidential. They may contain proprietary o
      r copyright
      material or information that is subject to legal professional privilege. Th
      ey are for
      the use of the intended recipient only.- Any unauthorised viewing, use, d
      isclosure,
      copying, alteration, storage or distribution of, or reliance on, this messa
      ge is
      strictly prohibited. No part may=0A be reproduced,=0A adapted or transmitte
      d without the
      written permission of the owner. If you have received this transmission in 
      error, or
      are not an authorised recipient, please immediately notify the sender by re
      turn email,
      delete this message and all copies from your e-mail system, and destroy any
       printed
      copies. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient should not be d
      eemed a
      waiver of any privilege or protection. Thales Australia does not warrant or
       represent
      that this e-mail or any documents, files and previous e-mail messages attac
      hed are
      error or virus free.
      --------------------------------------------------------------------k" href
      ="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matroni="_bl
      ank" href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.co - 
      - - - - - - - - - - - -Matt Dralle, List=0Ablank" hre
      f="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.===
      ===============
      
      
      =0A
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move | 
      
      Here is another picture of a fuel pump on M7-235 Maule I changed earlier th
      is year. big red hose for airconditioning of fuel pump.
      Patrick Thyssen
      
      --- On Thu, 9/24/09, Patrick Thyssen <jump2@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
      
      From: Patrick Thyssen <jump2@sbcglobal.net>
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move
      
      One thing I have just thought about and correct me if I'm wrong. From the f
      uel pump to the fuel pressure sending unit is up hill or above the fuel pum
      p. This being said if you get air in your hoses going to your pressure tran
      sducer from- being hot [vapor] then you could have a problem as to what i
      t is reporting.
      By having a compression of air instead of solid liquid.
      -Lets hear from the engineers.
      
      Patrick Thyssen
      Engine pickled again!!! for new instrument panel
      -Oh how I love OP
      
      --- On Thu, 9/24/09, McGann, Ron <Ron.McGann@thalesgroup.com.au> wrote:
      
      From: McGann, Ron <Ron.McGann@thalesgroup.com.au>
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Fuel Flow Transducer=0A Move
      
      au>
      
      Only 40 hours but same experience as Marcus.- Only irregluarity comes
      when the boost pump is engaged but the totaliser function always appears
      to reflect remaining fuel to within a gallon or so.
      
      Ron McGann
      
      Head of Engineering
      Security Solutions & Services
      Aerospace
      
      Tel: +61 2 9562 3530 | Mob: +61 (0) 466 655 393 | Fax: +61 2 9562 2100
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Cooper
      Sent: Friday, 25 September 2009 2:45 AM
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move
      
      
      I have about 430 hours with the transducer in the plans location.- No
      real
      issues although I do notice a slight FF drop when I turn the boost pump
      off.
      So far it has been very accurate and consistent.
      
      Marcus
      40286
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Nick Leonard
      Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 12:05 PM
      Subject: RV10-List: Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move
      
      
      As an informal survey for the rest of us, it would be interesting to get
      feedback from those that have left it where Van's originally suggested.
      Are
      any of you having any trouble with the transducer in=0A that location?
      
      How many people have moved the unit=0A because of inaccurate readings or
      other
      problems?
      
      --------
      Nick Leonard
      RV-10 (40015) Finish
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=264706#264706
      
      
      DISCLAIMER:----------------------------------------------------------------
      -----------
      This e-mail transmission and any documents, files and previous e-mail messa
      ges
      attached to it are private and confidential. They may contain proprietary o
      r copyright
      material or information that is subject to legal professional privilege. Th
      ey are for
      the use of the intended recipient only.- Any unauthorised viewing, use, d
      isclosure,
      copying, alteration, storage or distribution of, or reliance on, this messa
      ge is
      strictly prohibited. No part may=0A be reproduced,=0A adapted or transmitte
      d without the
      written permission of the owner. If you have received this transmission in 
      error, or
      are not an authorised recipient, please immediately notify the sender by re
      turn email,
      delete this message and all copies from your e-mail system, and destroy any
       printed
      copies. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient should not be d
      eemed a
      waiver of any privilege or protection. Thales Australia does not warrant or
       represent
      that this e-mail or any documents, files and previous e-mail messages attac
      hed are
      error or virus free.
      --------------------------------------------------------------------k" href
      ="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matroni="_bl
      ank" href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.co - 
      - - - - - - - - - - - -Matt Dralle, List=0Ablank" hre
      f="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.===
      ===============
      
      
      =0A
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move | 
      
      Ditto.
      Don McDonald
      
      --- On Thu, 9/24/09, Rene Felker <rene@felker.com> wrote:
      
      
      From: Rene Felker <rene@felker.com>
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move
      
      
      
      I left mine in the standard position.- I see very minor fluctuations....I
       do
      not think it is a problem.
      
      Rene' Felker
      RV-10 N423CF Flying
      801-721-6080
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Nick Leonard
      Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 10:05 AM
      Subject: RV10-List: Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move
      
      
      As an informal survey for the rest of us, it would be interesting to get
      feedback from those that have left it where Van's originally suggested.- 
      Are
      any of you having any trouble with the transducer in that location?
      
      How many people have moved the unit because of inaccurate readings or other
      problems?
      
      --------
      Nick Leonard
      RV-10 (40015) Finish
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=264706#264706
      
      
      le, List Admin.
      
      
      =0A=0A=0A      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move | 
      
      Patrick,
      
      Which statement(s) do you stand by?
      -Reading a 12 year old publication from JPI which documents the installation
      of a Flowscan transducer, NOT an EI red cube transducer?
      -Not using sealant on NPT fittings? ---really? why do you and JPI suggest
      not using sealant on NPT fittings?
      -Use of aluminum fittings on the transducer?  You do realize that the EI red
      cube transducer is made of aluminum, right?
      Because I said I did not read the JPI manual, does not mean I did not read
      the EI or AFS installation manuals which are MUCH more updated.  Why don't
      YOU take a look at the EI installation manual.  You will find no such
      admonishment on using aluminum or 90 degree fittings.  In fact, on page 5
      you will see 45 degree and 90 degree fittings as approved for installation
      with the red cube.  Here is a link to the EI fuel flow installation
      instructions.
      
      http://buy-ei.com/Information/II%20-%20FP-5.pdf
      
      
      William
      http://wcurtis.nerv10.com
      
      
      On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Patrick Thyssen <jump2@sbcglobal.net>wrote:
      
      >    I'LL STAND BY MY STATEMENT WITH THE ADDED INSERT, EI MAKE INSTALLATION
      > MANUALS ALSO. THEY REFERENCE AC43-13 ALSO. YOUR LOSS FOR NOT READING
      > EVERYTHING YOU CAN. YOU WOULD LEARN A LOT MORE.
      >  PATRICK THYSSEN
      >
      >
      > --- On *Thu, 9/24/09, William Curtis <wcurtis@nerv10.com>* wrote:
      >
      >
      > From: William Curtis <wcurtis@nerv10.com>
      > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move
      > To: rv10-list@matronics.com
      > Date: Thursday, September 24, 2009, 3:10 PM
      >
      >  Guess you did not read the caption above the photo regarding the aluminum
      > fitting.  NPT fittings benefit from sealant, AN fittings do not.  The inlet
      > to the flow transducer is NPT.  As far as the 90 degree fitting out from the
      > transducer, well that's what I have now on the Cardinal and it works just
      > fine.  The instrument I have in the Cardinal is Electronics International,
      > the OEM for the "red cube" transducer so no, I never read nor plan to read
      > the JPI manual.
      >
      > William
      > http://wcurtis.nerv10.com/
      >
      >  On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Patrick Thyssen <jump2@sbcglobal.net>wrote:
      >
      >>   Question, Why the teflon tape or pipe sealent? Why aluminum fitting
      >> into the transducer?
      >> JP instruments and I suggest never ever use that stuff on the transducer.
      >> And it would be a lot better if you had a straight out fitting from the
      >> transducer. Not the ninety. Good book to read Is the JPI installation
      >> manual. I think it''s the second page where it says, read this first.
      >> But that just my opinion and we all have one.
      >>  Patrick Thyssen
      >>
      >> But then I too made a mistake and bought OP Equiptment And now I'm fixing
      >> that.
      >> Dual 430w and garmin G500. Now I know they will work.
      >>
      >>
      >> --- On *Thu, 9/24/09, William Curtis <wcurtis@nerv10.com>* wrote:
      >>
      >>
      >> From: William Curtis <wcurtis@nerv10.com>
      >> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move
      >> To: rv10-list@matronics.com
      >> Date: Thursday, September 24, 2009, 11:56 AM
      >>
      >>   I think the general consensus is that is works fine in the standard
      >> location (tunnel) if you can accept some variability in flow indications
      >> when the electric fuel pump is on.  With that being said, mine sits BEFORE
      >> the flow divider on top of the air box in the picture below.  It is not
      >> flying yet but in my Cardinal it is AFTER the mechanical fuel pump BEFORE
      >> the servo and very stable.
      >>
      >> http://wcurtis.nerv10.com/90Electrical/EL2g.html
      >>
      >>  William
      >> http://wcurtis.nerv10.com/
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>  On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Nick Leonard <nick@nleonard.com<http://mc/compose?to=nick@nleonard.com>
      >> > wrote:
      >>
      >>> >
      >>>
      >>> As an informal survey for the rest of us, it would be interesting to get
      >>> feedback from those that have left it where Van's originally suggested.  Are
      >>> any of you having any trouble with the transducer in that location?
      >>>
      >>> How many people have moved the unit because of inaccurate readings or
      >>> other problems?
      >>>
      >>> --------
      >>> Nick Leonard
      >>> RV-10 (40015) Finish
      >>>
      >>>
      >>>
      >>>
      >>> Read this topic online here:
      >>>
      >>> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=264706#264706
      >>> t Un/Subscription,
      >>> www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List" target="_blank">
      >>> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
      >>> ronics.com/" target="_blank">http://forums.matronics.com
      >>> Matt Dralle, List Admin.
      >>> ====
      >>>
      >>>
      >>>
      >>>
      >>>
      >> *http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-Lisk" href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
      >>
      >> gt;  <http://www.matronics.com/======%3Cbr%3E%3Cbr%3E%3C/font%3E%3C/b%3E%3Cfont+color=>*
      >>
      >>  *
      >>
      >> get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
      >> ttp://forums.matronics.com
      >> _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      >>
      >> *
      >>
      >>
      > **
      >
      >  *
      >
      > *
      >
      >
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Window trim - inside | 
      
      
      Doug,
          One option is to wait until you install the interior and then go with
      something like Flightline interiors (http://www.flightlineinteriors.com/)
      has which is cloth sewn around some foam to form a bead that goes around the
      window.  Looks very nice, however make sure you use plenty of glue and force
      a little extra material around the window if possible as mine shrunk
      slightly and pulled away from the glue.
      
      Marcus
      40286
      Do not archive
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of n277dl
      Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 3:48 PM
      Subject: RV10-List: Window trim - inside
      
      
      Group...
         Linda and I glued the windows and wind screen in permanently last weekend
      using Weldon 10.  Worked much easier with cooler temps ... below 70 in the
      garage early in the morning than when we did the doors a few months back.
      (I put one bottle of weld10 in the fridge overnight and it seemed to be even
      a little slower to set up)
      
      These turned out pretty well.  On the outside of the windows, I'll use some
      lite weight cloth to fair the transition from plexi to fiberglass.
      
      What are the options on the inside of the windows where the weldon - plexi -
      fiberglass cabin frame meet?    Mine's not terrible and I attempted to
      smooth out the fair with weldon but it could be smoother and more
      consistent.  Is there any kind of caulking that will smooth the transition?
      
      Thanks,
      Doug
      
      --------
      Doug
      "Fools" are always more creative than process people and will
      always find ways to ruin a perfectly good set of processes.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=264780#264780
      
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Chargers ...... and batteries | 
      
      
        A really expensive battery to me would be the A123 batteries that Bill Dube had
      thought about bringing to our market.  The nice thing about a pair of 680's
      is that you can easily put them on a maintenance cycle where you replace one
      of them every one or two years during annual and you will probably never have
      a down aircraft due to a battery problem (leaving the master switch on doesn't
      count).
      
        AGM's are essentially a deep cycle battery that can put out a lot of amps and
      also sit for months without losing any charge (again, that always on clock doesn't
      count).  In my case the always on BATT bus is only drawing from one of the
      two batteries so even if the always on stuff like clock or trickle charge to
      EFIS internal batteries would happen to kill one of them, the remaining 680
      should have enough to get me started.  I also have the ability to isolate a battery
      in an alternator failure to supply nothing but my Lightspeed III.
      
        Swapping one of these batteries every other annual, or even every annual, at
      $100USD isn't that major of an expense to me and I can always use the old batteries
      in the lawnmower, computer UPS, car, etc.
      
      Michael
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Linn Walters
      Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 8:57 PM
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Chargers ...... and batteries
      
      
      Which causes me to ask why is everybody putting really expensive 
      batteries in their planes???
      Linn
      
      
      Miller John wrote:
      > Been using Battery Tenders on my Odyssey 680s for several years now with 
      > no problems.
      > 
      > It was recommended in Aviation Consumer as well as Light Plane Maintenance.
      > 
      > grumpy
      > N184JM
      > 
      > do not archive
      > 
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
        That seems to be the truth behind the marketing fluff.  The "special" Odyssey
      chargers are no different from a multipurpose charger with an AGM mode.  The
      main thing being that the AGM's are charged at 14.6 volts optimally.
      
        I also think that it's a must to have the desulphate capability to get the most
      life out of your battery, especially if you are regularly charging/discharging
      as in when you are playing with avionics.  I would guess the Schumacher has
      it but can't tell for sure.  Here's the link to the 12248:
      
      http://www.batteryminders.com/batterycharger/catalog/BatteryMINDer-12-Volt-2-4-or-8-Amp-Charger-Maintainer-Desulf-p-16133.html
      
        You can see the charging profiles under the "More Info" tab and in the instructions.
      There is a wealth of info in the instruction manual even if you don't
      use their chargers.
      
      Michael
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tim Olson
      Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 4:24 PM
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Chargers
      
      
      I watched the discussion on AeroElectric and read lots of things
      at other places about charging my Odyssey PC925, and spent a bunch
      of time reading before I bought a charger.  Michael's right, that
      12248 would eb a great way to go, and it's supposely got a great
      voltage curve for charging the Odyssey.
      
      What I did for myself though was a little different.  I got
      a larger charger, that costs a bit more.  I had been looking for
      Odyssey specific chargers, and wanted to make sure I did the best
      I could to charge at the right voltage.  There is an Odyssey
      labeled charger that looks exactly like the Schumacher
      Speed Charge 1200A, which WalMart also sells.  The difference I
      think is that the Odyssey doesn't have the variety of
      charging profiles.  I got one off Ebay really really cheap,
      and got one at WalMart too, so now I use them at home and
      at the hangar.
      
      Here is a link:
      
      http://store.schumachermart.com/sc-1200a.html
      
      A few weeks ago I got fired up to verify that this was really
      the same, so I sent Schumacher an email asking if they had
      the same charge curve, and they said they were the same.
      I'm assuming I'd use AGM mode, so that's what I've been
      using.  It's more expensive of a charger than you have
      to have, but it can charge other batteries too.
      
      I plug mine in sometimes if I have a big trip coming up,
      and want to ensure I've got a perfect charge, and I
      charge it during the winter when I don't fly as often.
      In the summer though, I generally don't charge it.
      I suppose I connect the charger maybe 10 times a year.
      
      Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD
      
      
      RV Builder (Michael Sausen) wrote:
      >   I'm using the BatteryMinder 12248 for my Odyssey batteries.  There was 
      > a write-up in one of the mags a few months back comparing different 
      > chargers and this one looked to be the best.  It will charge any style 
      > lead acid battery and also desulphates.  They will say on their site 
      > that you should get their "special" charger for Odyssey batteries but it 
      > only has a single profile in it for Odyssey AGM batteries.
      > 
      >  
      > 
      >   I spent a bunch of time looking at the information on the "special" 
      > charger vs. the 12248 which will charge flooded, AGM, and gel batteries 
      > and could not find a difference in the Odyssey vs. the AGM profiles that 
      > made it worthwhile.  I also run the Odyssey in my motorcycle and ATV but 
      > I wanted the options and I have been very happy with it.
      > 
      >  
      > 
      > Michael
      > 
      >  
      > 
      > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com 
      > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of 
      > *Dawson-Townsend,Timothy
      > *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2009 11:26 AM
      > *To:* rv10-list@matronics.com
      > *Subject:* RV10-List: Chargers
      > 
      >  
      > 
      > What are folks following for a battery-charging philosophy?  I am using 
      > Odyssey PC680s (who isn't?), and was wondering if folks are trickle 
      > charging all the time when you're in the hangar, only when not expecting 
      > to fly for a while, or only when it's winter, etc.
      > 
      >  
      > 
      > Please share your thoughts.
      > 
      > 
      > TDT
      > 
      >  
      > 
      > Tim Dawson-Townsend
      > 
      > Aurora Flight Sciences
      > 
      > tdt@aurora.aero <mailto:tdt@aurora.aero>
      > 
      > 617-500-4812 (office)
      > 
      > 617-905-4800 (mobile)
      > 
      >  
      > 
      > * *
      > 
      > * *
      > 
      > ;         - The RV10-List Email Forhref="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.===============
      > 
      > < Same great content also available via the Web Forums!
      > 
      > href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.comhttp://www.matronics.com/con
      > 
      > * *
      > 
      > *
      > 
      > 
      > *
      
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
        It's a pretty easy mod to use a pair of 680's in the stock location.  Sev
      eral of us have done it and you can still use a single contactor if you wan
      t.
      
      
      Michael
      
      
      [cid:image001.jpg@01CA3DC1.161FDD90]
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@m
      atronics.com] On Behalf Of David McNeill
      Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 8:01 PM
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Chargers
      
      
      
      
      No to the 680s without mod; too wide; also probably need additional master
      
      contactor to use either or both batteries.
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of McGann, Ron
      
      Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 4:44 PM
      
      
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Chargers
      
      
      
      --> <Ron.McGann@thalesgroup.com.au>
      
      
      I have posted previously on poor cranking performance.  I have had an issue
      
      with slow cranking ever since first start.  My battery failed completely tw
      o
      
      weeks ago.  I firmly believe my original (Concorde) battery was stuffed fro
      m
      
      the start and never really held a full charge - would not buy another.  Hav
      e
      
      not been able to get a PC925 locally yet, so used a Dekka sealed gel cell a
      s
      
      a temp measure.  Same size as the Concorde with 380CCA.  Could not believe
      
      how quickly the prop spun with a decent battery.
      
      
      When finalising my avionics integration, I used a 20Amp 13.2VDC power suppl
      y
      
      in parallel with the battery to prevent constant discharge.  I need to do
      
      some more research, but it would not surprise me if this contributed to the
      
      failure of the battery by overcharging it.
      
      
      BTW, is it possible to fit two 680s in the standard tray without
      
      modification?
      
      
      Cheers
      
      Ron
      
      
      VH-XRM, flying in Oz
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Saint
      
      Sent: Friday, 25 September 2009 3:44 AM
      
      
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Chargers
      
      
      I only put a charge on when I'm working on avionics or something without th
      e
      
      engine running.  Every once in a while, if the plane has been sitting for a
      
      while, I'll throw a charger on it just to make sure it is up to cranking.
      
      Never had a problem.  I use the Concord standard battery that Van's makes
      
      the tray for.
      
      
      do not archive
      
      
      Jesse Saint
      
      Saint Aviation, Inc.
      
      jesse@saintaviation.com
      
      Cell: 352-427-0285
      
      Fax: 815-377-3694
      
      
      On Sep 24, 2009, at 1:23 PM, Ande Boyer wrote:
      
      
      > Here's a noob question for you guys (I'm in the "prebuild/
      
      > investigation" phase of my RV-10 ;-)....
      
      >
      
      > It sounds like you guys have a battery charger as standard equipment.
      
      > Why is this? Does the battery that goes in the RV-10 not hold a
      
      > charge?  Or is there some kind of current leak?
      
      >
      
      > I've got a Warrior atm and we have no problem going weeks w/o running
      
      > it and it always cranks up just fine.
      
      >
      
      > Just wondering.....I've only been on this list for about 3 days and
      
      > have already learned so much.
      
      >
      
      > Thanks,
      
      > Ande Boyer
      
      > Huntsville, AL
      
      >
      
      >
      
      >
      
      > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Dawson-Townsend,Timothy
      
      > <tdawson-townsend@aurora.aero
      
      > > wrote:
      
      > What are folks following for a battery-charging philosophy?  I am
      
      > using Odyssey PC680s (who isn't?), and was wondering if folks are
      
      > trickle charging all the time when you're in the hangar, only when not
      
      > expecting to fly for a while, or only when it's winter, etc.
      
      >
      
      >
      
      > Please share your thoughts.
      
      >
      
      >
      
      > TDT
      
      >
      
      >
      
      >
      
      > Tim Dawson-Townsend
      
      >
      
      > Aurora Flight Sciences
      
      >
      
      > tdt@aurora.aero
      
      >
      
      > 617-500-4812 (office)
      
      >
      
      > 617-905-4800 (mobile)
      
      >
      
      >
      
      >
      
      >
      
      > get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
      
      > ttp://forums.matronics.com
      
      > _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      
      >
      
      >
      
      >
      
      >
      
      > --
      
      > "Pilots are a rare kind of human. They leave the ordinary surface of
      
      > the world, to purify their soul in the sky, and they come down to
      
      > earth, only after receiving the communion of the infinite." - Jos=E9
      
      > Maria Velasco Ibarra
      
      >
      
      >
      
      >
      
      >
      
      
      DISCLAIMER:----------------------------------------------------------------
      -
      
      ----------
      
      This e-mail transmission and any documents, files and previous e-mail
      
      messages attached to it are private and confidential. They may contain
      
      proprietary or copyright material or information that is subject to legal
      
      professional privilege. They are for the use of the intended recipient only
      .
      
      Any unauthorised viewing, use, disclosure, copying, alteration, storage or
      
      distribution of, or reliance on, this message is strictly prohibited. No
      
      part may be reproduced, adapted or transmitted without the written
      
      permission of the owner. If you have received this transmission in error, o
      r
      
      are not an authorised recipient, please immediately notify the sender by
      
      return email, delete this message and all copies from your e-mail system,
      
      and destroy any printed copies. Receipt by anyone other than the intended
      
      recipient should not be deemed a waiver of any privilege or protection.
      
      Thales Australia does not warrant or represent that this e-mail or any
      
      documents, files and previous e-mail messages attached are error or virus
      
      free.
      
      ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
      -
      
      ----------
      
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move | 
      
      You can get a similar cooling shroud for the pump on the 360/540 series fro
      m here....
      
      http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/eppages/fuelpumps.php
      
      Michael
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@m
      atronics.com] On Behalf Of Patrick Thyssen
      Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 2:35 AM
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move
      
      Here is another picture of a fuel pump on M7-235 Maule I changed earlier th
      is year. big red hose for airconditioning of fuel pump.
      Patrick Thyssen
      
      --- On Thu, 9/24/09, Patrick Thyssen <jump2@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
      
      From: Patrick Thyssen <jump2@sbcglobal.net>
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move
      One thing I have just thought about and correct me if I'm wrong. From the f
      uel pump to the fuel pressure sending unit is up hill or above the fuel pum
      p. This being said if you get air in your hoses going to your pressure tran
      sducer from  being hot [vapor] then you could have a problem as to what it 
      is reporting.
      By having a compression of air instead of solid liquid.
       Lets hear from the engineers.
      
      Patrick Thyssen
      Engine pickled again!!! for new instrument panel
       Oh how I love OP
      
      --- On Thu, 9/24/09, McGann, Ron <Ron.McGann@thalesgroup.com.au> wrote:
      
      From: McGann, Ron <Ron.McGann@thalesgroup.com.au>
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move
      au>
      
      Only 40 hours but same experience as Marcus.  Only irregluarity comes
      when the boost pump is engaged but the totaliser function always appears
      to reflect remaining fuel to within a gallon or so.
      
      Ron McGann
      
      Head of Engineering
      Security Solutions & Services
      Aerospace
      
      Tel: +61 2 9562 3530 | Mob: +61 (0) 466 655 393 | Fax: +61 2 9562 2100
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Cooper
      Sent: Friday, 25 September 2009 2:45 AM
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move
      
      
      I have about 430 hours with the transducer in the plans location.  No
      real
      issues although I do notice a slight FF drop when I turn the boost pump
      off.
      So far it has been very accurate and consistent.
      
      Marcus
      40286
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Nick Leonard
      Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 12:05 PM
      Subject: RV10-List: Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move
      
      
      As an informal survey for the rest of us, it would be interesting to get
      feedback from those that have left it where Van's originally suggested.
      Are
      any of you having any trouble with the transducer in that location?
      
      How many people have moved the unit because of inaccurate readings or
      other
      problems?
      
      --------
      Nick Leonard
      RV-10 (40015) Finish
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=264706#264706
      
      
      DISCLAIMER:----------------------------------------------------------------
      -----------
      This e-mail transmission and any documents, files and previous e-mail messa
      ges
      attached to it are private and confidential. They may contain proprietary o
      r copyright
      material or information that is subject to legal professional privilege. Th
      ey are for
      the use of the intended recipient only.  Any unauthorised viewing, use, dis
      closure,
      copying, alteration, storage or distribution of, or reliance on, this messa
      ge is
      strictly prohibited. No part may be reproduced, adapted or transmitted with
      out the
      written permission of the owner. If you have received this transmission in 
      error, or
      are not an authorised recipient, please immediately notify the sender by re
      turn email,
      delete this message and all copies from your e-mail system, and destroy any
       printed
      copies. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient should not be d
      eemed a
      waiver of any privilege or protection. Thales Australia does not warrant or
       represent
      that this e-mail or any documents, files and previous e-mail messages attac
      hed are
      error or virus free.
      --------------------------------------------------------------------k" href
      ="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matroni="_bl
      ank" href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.co       
                        -Matt Dralle, List blank" href="http://www.matronics.co
      m/contribution">http://www.matronics.============
      ======
      
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      It appears that the best price is:
      
      http://www.northerntool.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/product_6970_200326706
      _200326706?cm_mmc=housefile-_-recd-_-phone-_-conf 
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of RV Builder
      (Michael Sausen)
      Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 6:52 AM
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Chargers
      
      --> <rvbuilder@sausen.net>
      
        That seems to be the truth behind the marketing fluff.  The "special"
      Odyssey chargers are no different from a multipurpose charger with an AGM
      mode.  The main thing being that the AGM's are charged at 14.6 volts
      optimally.
      
        I also think that it's a must to have the desulphate capability to get the
      most life out of your battery, especially if you are regularly
      charging/discharging as in when you are playing with avionics.  I would
      guess the Schumacher has it but can't tell for sure.  Here's the link to the
      12248:
      
      http://www.batteryminders.com/batterycharger/catalog/BatteryMINDer-12-Volt-2
      -4-or-8-Amp-Charger-Maintainer-Desulf-p-16133.html
      
        You can see the charging profiles under the "More Info" tab and in the
      instructions.  There is a wealth of info in the instruction manual even if
      you don't use their chargers.
      
      Michael
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tim Olson
      Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 4:24 PM
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Chargers
      
      
      I watched the discussion on AeroElectric and read lots of things at other
      places about charging my Odyssey PC925, and spent a bunch of time reading
      before I bought a charger.  Michael's right, that
      12248 would eb a great way to go, and it's supposely got a great voltage
      curve for charging the Odyssey.
      
      What I did for myself though was a little different.  I got a larger
      charger, that costs a bit more.  I had been looking for Odyssey specific
      chargers, and wanted to make sure I did the best I could to charge at the
      right voltage.  There is an Odyssey labeled charger that looks exactly like
      the Schumacher Speed Charge 1200A, which WalMart also sells.  The difference
      I think is that the Odyssey doesn't have the variety of charging profiles.
      I got one off Ebay really really cheap, and got one at WalMart too, so now I
      use them at home and at the hangar.
      
      Here is a link:
      
      http://store.schumachermart.com/sc-1200a.html
      
      A few weeks ago I got fired up to verify that this was really the same, so I
      sent Schumacher an email asking if they had the same charge curve, and they
      said they were the same.
      I'm assuming I'd use AGM mode, so that's what I've been using.  It's more
      expensive of a charger than you have to have, but it can charge other
      batteries too.
      
      I plug mine in sometimes if I have a big trip coming up, and want to ensure
      I've got a perfect charge, and I charge it during the winter when I don't
      fly as often.
      In the summer though, I generally don't charge it.
      I suppose I connect the charger maybe 10 times a year.
      
      Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD
      
      
      RV Builder (Michael Sausen) wrote:
      >   I'm using the BatteryMinder 12248 for my Odyssey batteries.  There 
      > was a write-up in one of the mags a few months back comparing 
      > different chargers and this one looked to be the best.  It will charge 
      > any style lead acid battery and also desulphates.  They will say on 
      > their site that you should get their "special" charger for Odyssey 
      > batteries but it only has a single profile in it for Odyssey AGM
      batteries.
      > 
      >  
      > 
      >   I spent a bunch of time looking at the information on the "special" 
      > charger vs. the 12248 which will charge flooded, AGM, and gel 
      > batteries and could not find a difference in the Odyssey vs. the AGM 
      > profiles that made it worthwhile.  I also run the Odyssey in my 
      > motorcycle and ATV but I wanted the options and I have been very happy
      with it.
      > 
      >  
      > 
      > Michael
      > 
      >  
      > 
      > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of 
      > *Dawson-Townsend,Timothy
      > *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2009 11:26 AM
      > *To:* rv10-list@matronics.com
      > *Subject:* RV10-List: Chargers
      > 
      >  
      > 
      > What are folks following for a battery-charging philosophy?  I am 
      > using Odyssey PC680s (who isn't?), and was wondering if folks are 
      > trickle charging all the time when you're in the hangar, only when not 
      > expecting to fly for a while, or only when it's winter, etc.
      > 
      >  
      > 
      > Please share your thoughts.
      > 
      > 
      > TDT
      > 
      >  
      > 
      > Tim Dawson-Townsend
      > 
      > Aurora Flight Sciences
      > 
      > tdt@aurora.aero <mailto:tdt@aurora.aero>
      > 
      > 617-500-4812 (office)
      > 
      > 617-905-4800 (mobile)
      > 
      >  
      > 
      > * *
      > 
      > * *
      > 
      > ;         - The RV10-List Email
      Forhref="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.
      ===============
      > 
      > < Same great content also available via the Web Forums!
      > 
      > href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.comhttp://w
      > ww.matronics.com/con
      > 
      > * *
      > 
      > *
      > 
      > 
      > *
      
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      A heads up on the door hinges.
      If you read the plans carefully, you'll find a confusing error. They 
      show the left door hinges with the proper parts call out.  When the 
      plans say to repeat the steps for the right door, if you where to use 
      the same parts call out, they would be reversed. It was obvious that 
      something was wrong, but I wasn't sure which  door was wrong. I called 
      Scott at Vans and he went out to the company's RV10 and took pictures 
      and emailed me them. The call out for the left door is correct, that is 
      the lower part of the hinge should face the center of the door, as the 
      plans show. The right door should just mirror image the left, although 
      the part numbers are reversed. Better safe than sorry, so I always check 
      when something doesn't compute. Thanks to Scott for his prompt help, and 
      not laughing at me for requiring clarification for something as probably 
      obvious to most.
      Chris Hukill
      Trying to close the door on all this fiberglass work!
      
Message 12
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      here's another alternative
      
        _____  
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of RV Builder
      (Michael Sausen)
      Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 7:18 AM
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Chargers
      
      
        It's a pretty easy mod to use a pair of 680's in the stock location.
      Several of us have done it and you can still use a single contactor if 
      you
      want.
      
      
      Michael
      
      
      FP29052007A000H3.jpg
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of David McNeill
      Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 8:01 PM
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Chargers
      
      
      
      
      No to the 680s without mod; too wide; also probably need additional 
      master
      
      contactor to use either or both batteries.
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of McGann, Ron
      
      Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 4:44 PM
      
      
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Chargers
      
      
      
      --> <Ron.McGann@thalesgroup.com.au>
      
      
      I have posted previously on poor cranking performance.  I have had an 
      issue
      
      with slow cranking ever since first start.  My battery failed completely 
      two
      
      weeks ago.  I firmly believe my original (Concorde) battery was stuffed 
      from
      
      the start and never really held a full charge - would not buy another.  
      Have
      
      not been able to get a PC925 locally yet, so used a Dekka sealed gel 
      cell as
      
      a temp measure.  Same size as the Concorde with 380CCA.  Could not 
      believe
      
      how quickly the prop spun with a decent battery. 
      
      
      When finalising my avionics integration, I used a 20Amp 13.2VDC power 
      supply
      
      in parallel with the battery to prevent constant discharge.  I need to 
      do
      
      some more research, but it would not surprise me if this contributed to 
      the
      
      failure of the battery by overcharging it.
      
      
      BTW, is it possible to fit two 680s in the standard tray without
      
      modification?
      
      
      Cheers
      
      Ron
      
      
      VH-XRM, flying in Oz
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Saint
      
      Sent: Friday, 25 September 2009 3:44 AM
      
      
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Chargers
      
      
      I only put a charge on when I'm working on avionics or something without 
      the
      
      engine running.  Every once in a while, if the plane has been sitting 
      for a
      
      while, I'll throw a charger on it just to make sure it is up to 
      cranking.
      
      Never had a problem.  I use the Concord standard battery that Van's 
      makes
      
      the tray for.
      
      
      do not archive
      
      
      Jesse Saint
      
      Saint Aviation, Inc.
      
      jesse@saintaviation.com
      
      Cell: 352-427-0285
      
      Fax: 815-377-3694
      
      
      On Sep 24, 2009, at 1:23 PM, Ande Boyer wrote:
      
      
      > Here's a noob question for you guys (I'm in the "prebuild/ 
      
      > investigation" phase of my RV-10 ;-)....
      
      > 
      
      > It sounds like you guys have a battery charger as standard equipment. 
      
      > Why is this? Does the battery that goes in the RV-10 not hold a 
      
      > charge?  Or is there some kind of current leak?
      
      > 
      
      > I've got a Warrior atm and we have no problem going weeks w/o running 
      
      > it and it always cranks up just fine.
      
      > 
      
      > Just wondering.....I've only been on this list for about 3 days and 
      
      > have already learned so much.
      
      > 
      
      > Thanks,
      
      > Ande Boyer
      
      > Huntsville, AL
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Dawson-Townsend,Timothy 
      
      > <tdawson-townsend@aurora.aero
      
      > > wrote:
      
      > What are folks following for a battery-charging philosophy?  I am 
      
      > using Odyssey PC680s (who isn't?), and was wondering if folks are 
      
      > trickle charging all the time when you're in the hangar, only when not 
      
      
      > expecting to fly for a while, or only when it's winter, etc.
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > Please share your thoughts.
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > TDT
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > Tim Dawson-Townsend
      
      > 
      
      > Aurora Flight Sciences
      
      > 
      
      > tdt@aurora.aero
      
      > 
      
      > 617-500-4812 (office)
      
      > 
      
      > 617-905-4800 (mobile)
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
      
      > ttp://forums.matronics.com
      
      > _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > --
      
      > "Pilots are a rare kind of human. They leave the ordinary surface of 
      
      > the world, to purify their soul in the sky, and they come down to 
      
      > earth, only after receiving the communion of the infinite." - Jos=E9 
      
      > Maria Velasco Ibarra
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      
      DISCLAIMER:--------------------------------------------------------------
      ---
      
      ----------
      
      This e-mail transmission and any documents, files and previous e-mail
      
      messages attached to it are private and confidential. They may contain
      
      proprietary or copyright material or information that is subject to 
      legal
      
      professional privilege. They are for the use of the intended recipient 
      only.
      
      Any unauthorised viewing, use, disclosure, copying, alteration, storage 
      or
      
      distribution of, or reliance on, this message is strictly prohibited. No
      
      part may be reproduced, adapted or transmitted without the written
      
      permission of the owner. If you have received this transmission in 
      error, or
      
      are not an authorised recipient, please immediately notify the sender by
      
      return email, delete this message and all copies from your e-mail 
      system,
      
      and destroy any printed copies. Receipt by anyone other than the 
      intended
      
      recipient should not be deemed a waiver of any privilege or protection.
      
      Thales Australia does not warrant or represent that this e-mail or any
      
      documents, files and previous e-mail messages attached are error or 
      virus
      
      free.
      
      -------------------------------------------------------------------------
      ---
      
      ----------
      
      
      =================== 
      
      ail Forum - 
      
      browse 
      
      ription, 
      
      Chat, FAQ, 
      
      > or?RV10-List 
      
      =================== 
      
      ATRONICS WEB FORUMS - 
      
      Forums! 
      
      =================== 
      
      ntribution Web Site - 
      
      /o:p> 
      
                     -Matt Dralle, List Admin. 
      
      ution 
      
      =================== 
      
      
Message 13
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      have fun getting the doors to fit now!
      
      
      From: Chris Hukill 
      Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 8:27 AM
      Subject: RV10-List: Door hinges
      
      
      A heads up on the door hinges.
      If you read the plans carefully, you'll find a confusing error. They 
      show the left door hinges with the proper parts call out.  When the 
      plans say to repeat the steps for the right door, if you where to use 
      the same parts call out, they would be reversed. It was obvious that 
      something was wrong, but I wasn't sure which  door was wrong. I called 
      Scott at Vans and he went out to the company's RV10 and took pictures 
      and emailed me them. The call out for the left door is correct, that is 
      the lower part of the hinge should face the center of the door, as the 
      plans show. The right door should just mirror image the left, although 
      the part numbers are reversed. Better safe than sorry, so I always check 
      when something doesn't compute. Thanks to Scott for his prompt help, and 
      not laughing at me for requiring clarification for something as probably 
      obvious to most.
      Chris Hukill
      Trying to close the door on all this fiberglass work!
      
      
Message 14
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move | 
      
      
      I've got one of those.  Haven't installed it yet, but I have it.
      Some day if I get real bored or ambitious, I'll put it on
      and report back.  Maybe years from now.  I know if I ever pull
      the engine I'll install it, but not sure if I will otherwise.
      
      
      Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD
      do not archive
      
      
      RV Builder (Michael Sausen) wrote:
      > You can get a similar cooling shroud for the pump on the 360/540 series 
      > from here.
      > 
      >  
      > 
      > http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/eppages/fuelpumps.php
      > 
      >  
      > 
      > Michael
      > 
      >  
      > 
      > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com 
      > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Patrick Thyssen
      > *Sent:* Friday, September 25, 2009 2:35 AM
      > *To:* rv10-list@matronics.com
      > *Subject:* RE: RV10-List: Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move
      > 
      >  
      > 
      > Here is another picture of a fuel pump on M7-235 Maule I changed earlier 
      > this year. big red hose for airconditioning of fuel pump.
      > Patrick Thyssen
      > 
      > --- On *Thu, 9/24/09, Patrick Thyssen /<jump2@sbcglobal.net>/* wrote:
      > 
      > 
      > From: Patrick Thyssen <jump2@sbcglobal.net>
      > Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move
      > To: rv10-list@matronics.com
      > Date: Thursday, September 24, 2009, 10:17 PM
      > 
      > One thing I have just thought about and correct me if I'm wrong. From 
      > the fuel pump to the fuel pressure sending unit is up hill or above the 
      > fuel pump. This being said if you get air in your hoses going to your 
      > pressure transducer from  being hot [vapor] then you could have a 
      > problem as to what it is reporting.
      > By having a compression of air instead of solid liquid.
      >  Lets hear from the engineers.
      > 
      > Patrick Thyssen
      > Engine pickled again!!! for new instrument panel
      >  Oh how I love OP
      > 
      > --- On *Thu, 9/24/09, McGann, Ron /<Ron.McGann@thalesgroup.com.au>/* wrote:
      > 
      > 
      > From: McGann, Ron <Ron.McGann@thalesgroup.com.au>
      > Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move
      > To: rv10-list@matronics.com
      > Date: Thursday, September 24, 2009, 5:28 PM
      > 
      > <Ron.McGann@thalesgroup.com.au>
      > 
      > Only 40 hours but same experience as Marcus.  Only irregluarity comes
      > when the boost pump is engaged but the totaliser function always appears
      > to reflect remaining fuel to within a gallon or so.
      > 
      > Ron McGann
      > 
      > Head of Engineering
      > Security Solutions & Services
      > Aerospace
      > 
      > Tel: +61 2 9562 3530 | Mob: +61 (0) 466 655 393 | Fax: +61 2 9562 2100
      > 
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Cooper
      > Sent: Friday, 25 September 2009 2:45 AM
      > To: rv10-list@matronics.com
      > Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move
      > 
      > 
      > I have about 430 hours with the transducer in the plans location.  No
      > real
      > issues although I do notice a slight FF drop when I turn the boost pump
      > off.
      > So far it has been very accurate and consistent.
      > 
      > Marcus
      > 40286
      > 
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Nick Leonard
      > Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 12:05 PM
      > To: rv10-list@matronics.com
      > Subject: RV10-List: Re: Fuel Flow Transducer Move
      > 
      > 
      > As an informal survey for the rest of us, it would be interesting to get
      > feedback from those that have left it where Van's originally suggested.
      > Are
      > any of you having any trouble with the transducer in that location?
      > 
      > How many people have moved the unit because of inaccurate readings or
      > other
      > problems?
      > 
      > --------
      > Nick Leonard
      > RV-10 (40015) Finish
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > Read this topic online here:
      > 
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=264706#264706
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > DISCLAIMER:---------------------------------------------------------------------------
      > This e-mail transmission and any documents, files and previous e-mail 
      > messages
      > attached to it are private and confidential. They may contain 
      > proprietary or copyright
      > material or information that is subject to legal professional privilege. 
      > They are for
      > the use of the intended recipient only.  Any unauthorised viewing, use, 
      > disclosure,
      > copying, alteration, storage or distribution of, or reliance on, this 
      > message is
      > strictly prohibited. No part may be reproduced, adapted or transmitted 
      > without the
      > written permission of the owner. If you have received this transmission 
      > in error, or
      > are not an authorised recipient, please immediately notify the sender by 
      > return email,
      > delete this message and all copies from your e-mail system, and destroy 
      > any printed
      > copies. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient should not 
      > be deemed a
      > waiver of any privilege or protection. Thales Australia does not warrant 
      > or represent
      > that this e-mail or any documents, files and previous e-mail messages 
      > attached are
      > error or virus free.
      > --------------------------------------------------------------------k" 
      > href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matroni="_blank" 
      > href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.co           
      >               -Matt Dralle, List blank" 
      > href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.==================
      > 
      > 
      >  
      > 
      > *
      > 
      > 
      > *
      
      
Message 15
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      And other than lawyer-speak ..... does anyone have the faintest idea why 
      it's "Not for use with 12V aircraft battery.?????
      Linn
      
      do not archive
      
      
      David McNeill wrote:
      > 
      > It appears that the best price is:
      > 
      > http://www.northerntool.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/product_6970_200326706
      > _200326706?cm_mmc=housefile-_-recd-_-phone-_-conf 
      > 
      
      
Message 16
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      
      I was checking the Schumacher manual today on the SC-1200A and
      it does show that it has a desulphate mode.  Doesn't look like
      it's used as part of a normal charge cycle though.  I'm not
      totally sure of the details on it.
      
      I did remember that the one that is often mentioned on Aeroelectric
      is the one referred to in these 2 clippings from 2008 that i'll
      repost:
      ---------------------
      "Yeah, I saw those a couple of days ago at WallyWorld.
        I've got one of the older versions and did extensive
        testing that showed this little guy was about 2x
        faster than the Battery-Minder/Battery-Tender wall-wart
        crowd (0.8A versus 1.5A recharge) and equally as
        "smart" with at less than 2/3 the price.
      
        My favorite of the small guys.
      
        Bob . . . "
      
      "New number is SEM-1562A old # was WM-1562A"
      ----------------------
      
      Tim
      
      
      RV Builder (Michael Sausen) wrote:
      > <rvbuilder@sausen.net>
      > 
      > That seems to be the truth behind the marketing fluff.  The "special"
      > Odyssey chargers are no different from a multipurpose charger with an
      > AGM mode.  The main thing being that the AGM's are charged at 14.6
      > volts optimally.
      > 
      > I also think that it's a must to have the desulphate capability to
      > get the most life out of your battery, especially if you are
      > regularly charging/discharging as in when you are playing with
      > avionics.  I would guess the Schumacher has it but can't tell for
      > sure.  Here's the link to the 12248:
      > 
      > http://www.batteryminders.com/batterycharger/catalog/BatteryMINDer-12-Volt-2-4-or-8-Amp-Charger-Maintainer-Desulf-p-16133.html
      > 
      > 
      > You can see the charging profiles under the "More Info" tab and in
      > the instructions.  There is a wealth of info in the instruction
      > manual even if you don't use their chargers.
      > 
      > Michael
      > 
      > -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tim Olson 
      > Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 4:24 PM To:
      > rv10-list@matronics.com Subject: Re: RV10-List: Chargers
      > 
      > 
      > I watched the discussion on AeroElectric and read lots of things at
      > other places about charging my Odyssey PC925, and spent a bunch of
      > time reading before I bought a charger.  Michael's right, that 12248
      > would eb a great way to go, and it's supposely got a great voltage
      > curve for charging the Odyssey.
      > 
      > What I did for myself though was a little different.  I got a larger
      > charger, that costs a bit more.  I had been looking for Odyssey
      > specific chargers, and wanted to make sure I did the best I could to
      > charge at the right voltage.  There is an Odyssey labeled charger
      > that looks exactly like the Schumacher Speed Charge 1200A, which
      > WalMart also sells.  The difference I think is that the Odyssey
      > doesn't have the variety of charging profiles.  I got one off Ebay
      > really really cheap, and got one at WalMart too, so now I use them at
      > home and at the hangar.
      > 
      > Here is a link:
      > 
      > http://store.schumachermart.com/sc-1200a.html
      > 
      > A few weeks ago I got fired up to verify that this was really the
      > same, so I sent Schumacher an email asking if they had the same
      > charge curve, and they said they were the same. I'm assuming I'd use
      > AGM mode, so that's what I've been using.  It's more expensive of a
      > charger than you have to have, but it can charge other batteries too.
      > 
      > 
      > I plug mine in sometimes if I have a big trip coming up, and want to
      > ensure I've got a perfect charge, and I charge it during the winter
      > when I don't fly as often. In the summer though, I generally don't
      > charge it. I suppose I connect the charger maybe 10 times a year.
      > 
      > Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > RV Builder (Michael Sausen) wrote:
      >> I'm using the BatteryMinder 12248 for my Odyssey batteries.  There
      >> was a write-up in one of the mags a few months back comparing
      >> different chargers and this one looked to be the best.  It will
      >> charge any style lead acid battery and also desulphates.  They will
      >> say on their site that you should get their "special" charger for
      >> Odyssey batteries but it only has a single profile in it for
      >> Odyssey AGM batteries.
      >> 
      >> 
      >> 
      >> I spent a bunch of time looking at the information on the "special"
      >>  charger vs. the 12248 which will charge flooded, AGM, and gel
      >> batteries and could not find a difference in the Odyssey vs. the
      >> AGM profiles that made it worthwhile.  I also run the Odyssey in my
      >> motorcycle and ATV but I wanted the options and I have been very
      >> happy with it.
      >> 
      >> 
      >> 
      >> Michael
      >> 
      >> 
      >> 
      >> *From:* owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com 
      >> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of 
      >> *Dawson-Townsend,Timothy *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2009 11:26
      >> AM *To:* rv10-list@matronics.com *Subject:* RV10-List: Chargers
      >> 
      >> 
      >> 
      >> What are folks following for a battery-charging philosophy?  I am
      >> using Odyssey PC680s (who isn't?), and was wondering if folks are
      >> trickle charging all the time when you're in the hangar, only when
      >> not expecting to fly for a while, or only when it's winter, etc.
      >> 
      >> 
      >> 
      >> Please share your thoughts.
      >> 
      >> 
      >> TDT
      >> 
      >> 
      >> 
      >> Tim Dawson-Townsend
      >> 
      >> Aurora Flight Sciences
      >> 
      >> tdt@aurora.aero <mailto:tdt@aurora.aero>
      >> 
      >> 617-500-4812 (office)
      >> 
      >> 617-905-4800 (mobile)
      >> 
      >> 
      >> 
      >> * *
      >> 
      >> * *
      >> 
      >> ;         - The RV10-List Email
      >> Forhref="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.===============
      >> 
      >> 
      >> < Same great content also available via the Web Forums!
      >> 
      >> href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.comhttp://www.matronics.com/con
      >> 
      >> 
      >> * *
      >> 
      >> *
      >> 
      >> 
      >> *
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      
      
Message 17
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Hi
      
      
      Save yourself some grief and fit you doors with the seals on. The geometry
      changes after the seals are in place.
      
      
      Cheers
      
      
      Les
      
      #40643 - Living in f/g hell 
      
      
        _____  
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Pascal
      Sent: September-25-09 10:11 AM
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Door hinges
      
      
      have fun getting the doors to fit now!
      
      
      From: Chris Hukill <mailto:cjhukill@cox.net>  
      
      Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 8:27 AM
      
      
      Subject: RV10-List: Door hinges
      
      
      A heads up on the door hinges.
      
      If you read the plans carefully, you'll find a confusing error. They show
      the left door hinges with the proper parts call out.  When the plans say to
      repeat the steps for the right door, if you where to use the same parts call
      out, they would be reversed. It was obvious that something was wrong, but I
      wasn't sure which  door was wrong. I called Scott at Vans and he went out to
      the company's RV10 and took pictures and emailed me them. The call out for
      the left door is correct, that is the lower part of the hinge should face
      the center of the door, as the plans show. The right door should just mirror
      image the left, although the part numbers are reversed. Better safe than
      sorry, so I always check when something doesn't compute. Thanks to Scott for
      his prompt help, and not laughing at me for requiring clarification for
      something as probably obvious to most.
      
      Chris Hukill
      
      Trying to close the door on all this fiberglass work!
      
      
      href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com
      /Navigator?RV10-List
      href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
      href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c
      
      
Message 18
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Hi Again
      
      
      For clarity - I mean after the hinges are installed and you are working on
      fitting the door so that the gaps etc are correct.
      
      
      ..L 
      
      
        _____  
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Les Kearney
      Sent: September-25-09 10:40 AM
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Door hinges
      
      
      Hi
      
      
      Save yourself some grief and fit you doors with the seals on. The geometry
      changes after the seals are in place.
      
      
      Cheers
      
      
      Les
      
      #40643 - Living in f/g hell 
      
      
        _____  
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Pascal
      Sent: September-25-09 10:11 AM
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Door hinges
      
      
      have fun getting the doors to fit now!
      
      
      From: Chris Hukill <mailto:cjhukill@cox.net>  
      
      Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 8:27 AM
      
      
      Subject: RV10-List: Door hinges
      
      
      A heads up on the door hinges.
      
      If you read the plans carefully, you'll find a confusing error. They show
      the left door hinges with the proper parts call out.  When the plans say to
      repeat the steps for the right door, if you where to use the same parts call
      out, they would be reversed. It was obvious that something was wrong, but I
      wasn't sure which  door was wrong. I called Scott at Vans and he went out to
      the company's RV10 and took pictures and emailed me them. The call out for
      the left door is correct, that is the lower part of the hinge should face
      the center of the door, as the plans show. The right door should just mirror
      image the left, although the part numbers are reversed. Better safe than
      sorry, so I always check when something doesn't compute. Thanks to Scott for
      his prompt help, and not laughing at me for requiring clarification for
      something as probably obvious to most.
      
      Chris Hukill
      
      Trying to close the door on all this fiberglass work!
      
      
      href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com
      /Navigator?RV10-List
      href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
      href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c
      
      
      http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
      
      http://forums.matronics.com
      
      http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      
Message 19
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Right there with you Les...
      
      Do Not Archive
      Jeff Carpenter
      40304
      
      
      On Sep 25, 2009, at 9:40 AM, Les Kearney wrote:
      
      > Hi
      >
      > Save yourself some grief and fit you doors with the seals on. The  
      > geometry changes after the seals are in place.
      >
      > Cheers
      >
      > Les
      > #40643 ' Living in f/g hell
      >
      > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com 
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com 
      > ] On Behalf OfPascal
      > Sent: September-25-09 10:11 AM
      > To: rv10-list@matronics.com
      > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Door hinges
      >
      > have fun getting the doors to fit now!
      >
      > From: Chris Hukill
      > Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 8:27 AM
      > To: rv10-list@matronics.com
      > Subject: RV10-List: Door hinges
      >
      > A heads up on the door hinges.
      > If you read the plans carefully, you'll find a confusing error. They  
      
      > show the left door hinges with the proper parts call out.  When the  
      
      > plans say to repeat the steps for the right door, if you where to  
      > use the same parts call out, they would be reversed. It was obvious  
      
      > that something was wrong, but I wasn't sure which  door was wrong. I  
      
      > called Scott at Vans and he went out to the company's RV10 and took  
      
      > pictures and emailed me them. The call out for the left door is  
      > correct, that is the lower part of the hinge should face the center  
      
      > of the door, as the plans show. The right door should just mirror  
      > image the left, although the part numbers are reversed. Better safe  
      
      > than sorry, so I always check when something doesn't compute. Thanks  
      
      > to Scott for his prompt help, and not laughing at me for requiring  
      > clarification for something as probably obvious to most.
      > Chris Hukill
      > Trying to close the door on all this fiberglass work!
      >
      >
      > 
      href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics
      .com/Navigator?RV10-List
      > href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
      > href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http:// 
      > www.matronics.com/c
      >
      >
      > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
      > http://forums.matronics.com
      > http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      >
      >
      
      
Message 20
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      Not TSOed or Certified? Seriously most of the sealed batteries used for
      experimental aviation purposes are AGM. Also BM have one they call for
      aviation purposes; price is about $140 versus $100 at northern tools. Same
      12248 and same specs. 
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Linn Walters
      Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 9:30 AM
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Chargers
      
      --> <pitts_pilot@bellsouth.net>
      
      And other than lawyer-speak ..... does anyone have the faintest idea why
      it's "Not for use with 12V aircraft battery.?????
      Linn
      
      do not archive
      
      
      David McNeill wrote:
      > 
      > It appears that the best price is:
      > 
      > http://www.northerntool.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/product_6970_200
      > 326706 _200326706?cm_mmc=housefile-_-recd-_-phone-_-conf
      > 
      
      
Message 21
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      I too looked very carefully at this section, before deciding the instructions are
      correct. You'll  notice they refer to the hinges as "left" and "right",  not
      fore and aft. The "left" and "right" are correct for both doors (as you face
      them); obviously, "fore" and "aft" are reversed as you move to the right hand
      door.
      
      --------
      Bob Turner
      RV-10 QB
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=264968#264968
      
      
Message 22
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      If using the BM 12248, each battery on board will have to be maintained
      separately, since it appears to need to sense the voltage of the battery.
      The easiest way it seems to do this is establish a DC receptacles that uses
      ring terminals across the battery posts. Then alternate as required
      different days/weeks to desulphate and maintain each on board battery. For
      those with constant draw items perhaps the charger should be left connected
      that battery. Receptacles are $7 each at Radio shack, DC plug also $7. The
      plug will have to be connected to the ring accessory cord that is included
      with the charger. 
      
Message 23
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Check the following for differences. It appears that the aviation and
      Odyssey versions are designed to be idiot proof.
      
      http://www.batteryminders.com/batterycharger/catalog/Aviation-Specific-Maint
      enance-Battery-Charger-De-Sulfators-orderby0-p-1-c-249.html
      
Message 24
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
        Actually, the manual for that depicts how to connect it to multiple batte
      ries at once.  Shouldn't be a problem.  I believe the way 'lectric Bob has 
      explained it in the past is that the charger will sense the combined voltag
      e but the resistance to charge will vary by the charge level so the battery
       needing the charge will take more than the battery with a full charge.
      
      Michael
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@m
      atronics.com] On Behalf Of David McNeill
      Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 12:40 PM
      Subject: RV10-List: Chargers
      
      If using the BM 12248, each battery on board will have to be maintained sep
      arately, since it appears to need to sense the voltage of the battery. The 
      easiest way it seems to do this is establish a DC receptacles that uses rin
      g terminals across the battery posts. Then alternate as required different 
      days/weeks to desulphate and maintain each on board battery. For those with
       constant draw items perhaps the charger should be left connected that batt
      ery. Receptacles are $7 each at Radio shack, DC plug also $7. The plug will
       have to be connected to the ring accessory cord that is included with the 
      charger.
      
      
Message 25
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Flap positioning system | 
      
      For those who have the flap pre-select system: I am at stage to decide
      whether I want this system or not. My question is whether it can be adjusted
      to select reflex, trail, 1/2 and full flaps? Or can you only get 10, 20, 30
      degrees?
      Kelly
      40866
      QB arriving
      
Message 26
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Flap positioning system | 
      
      That is exactly what you get - reflex, 0, =BD and full.
      
      Bob
      N442PM
      
      ________________________________
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@m
      atronics.com] On Behalf Of Kelly McMullen
      Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 1:39 PM
      Subject: RV10-List: Flap positioning system
      
      For those who have the flap pre-select system: I am at stage to decide whet
      her I want this system or not. My question is whether it can be adjusted to
       select reflex, trail, 1/2 and full flaps? Or can you only get 10, 20, 30 d
      egrees?
      Kelly
      40866
      QB arriving
      
      
Message 27
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Flap positioning system | 
      
      
      If I did it again I think I would rather have more control over exactly how
       much down=C2-flap I could use past zero. At times full is too much and 1
      /2 is not enough but I'm just being picky I suppose. I do like the zero set
      ting for take off vs. the reflex or -3 degree setting. I've found the diffe
      rence being at zero the aircraft just flies off without much back pressure 
      at all with an overall increase in climb performance. =C2-In the =C2-re
      flex=C2-position =C2-you need a bit more pressure to rotate and take of
      f.....that extra one inch of pull is wearing me out! The system works great
       though. 
      
      
      Rick Sked 
      
      N246RS 
      
      Flying naked 
      
      Painting the pants and fairings 
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "Bob Condrey (US SSA)" <bob.condrey@baesystems.com> 
      Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 11:42:21 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
      
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Flap positioning system 
      
      
      That is exactly what you get =93 reflex, 0, =C2=BD and full. 
      
      
      Bob 
      
      N442PM 
      
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@m
      atronics.com] On Behalf Of Kelly McMullen 
      Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 1:39 PM 
      Subject: RV10-List: Flap positioning system 
      
      
      For those who have the flap pre-select system: I am at stage to decide whet
      her I want this system or not. My question is whether it can be adjusted to
       select reflex, trail, 1/2 and full flaps? Or can you only get 10, 20, 30 d
      egrees? 
      Kelly 
      40866 
      QB arriving =C2- =C2- http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List http
      ========
      ===
      === http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List http://forums.matron
      ===
      ===
      ==
      
Message 28
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Flap positioning system | 
      
      
      I see no reason for any more than these 4 settings,
      but by cutting a couple more notches you could
      add a couple more steps if you really felt it necessary.
      The way it flies though, I see no need for any more
      than what it has now.  I think, but have not
      measured, that it's reflex, 0, 15, 25
      
      Tim
      
      
      Condrey, Bob (US SSA) wrote:
      > That is exactly what you get  reflex, 0,  and full.
      > 
      >  
      > 
      > Bob
      > 
      > N442PM
      > 
      >  
      > 
      > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
      > 
      > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com 
      > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Kelly McMullen
      > *Sent:* Friday, September 25, 2009 1:39 PM
      > *To:* rv10-list@matronics.com
      > *Subject:* RV10-List: Flap positioning system
      > 
      >  
      > 
      > For those who have the flap pre-select system: I am at stage to decide 
      > whether I want this system or not. My question is whether it can be 
      > adjusted to select reflex, trail, 1/2 and full flaps? Or can you only 
      > get 10, 20, 30 degrees?
      > Kelly
      > 40866
      > QB arriving
      > 
      > * *
      > 
      > * *
      > 
      > **
      > 
      > **
      > 
      > **
      > 
      > *http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List*
      > 
      > **
      > 
      > **
      > 
      > *http://forums.matronics.com*
      > 
      > **
      > 
      > **
      > 
      > *http://www.matronics.com/contribution*
      > 
      > * *
      > 
      > *
      > 
      > 
      > *
      
      
Message 29
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Multiple batteries at once are fine provided you don't want to leave the
      hook up in place and all connected to a single charge point. I have examined
      my twin 680 setup which is wired in parallel to use either or both in
      starting. If I wire them to the 12248 for multiple charge then the leads to
      the second battery must have diodes to prevent "charge leveling" when the
      charger is not connected ; hence the charger will not sense the voltage of
      the second battery when connected. 
      
        _____  
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of RV Builder
      (Michael Sausen)
      Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 11:37 AM
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Chargers
      
      
        Actually, the manual for that depicts how to connect it to multiple
      batteries at once.  Shouldn't be a problem.  I believe the way 'lectric Bob
      has explained it in the past is that the charger will sense the combined
      voltage but the resistance to charge will vary by the charge level so the
      battery needing the charge will take more than the battery with a full
      charge.
      
      
      Michael
      
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of David McNeill
      Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 12:40 PM
      Subject: RV10-List: Chargers
      
      
      If using the BM 12248, each battery on board will have to be maintained
      separately, since it appears to need to sense the voltage of the battery.
      The easiest way it seems to do this is establish a DC receptacles that uses
      ring terminals across the battery posts. Then alternate as required
      different days/weeks to desulphate and maintain each on board battery. For
      those with constant draw items perhaps the charger should be left connected
      that battery. Receptacles are $7 each at Radio shack, DC plug also $7. The
      plug will have to be connected to the ring accessory cord that is included
      with the charger. 
      
      
      http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
      http://forums.matronics.com
      http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      
      
Message 30
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Flap positioning system | 
      
      Rick
      
      
      Sounds like you need to life weights then hehehe, worn our all of us 
      still pounding rivits are worn out, LOL
      
      
      I will look you up next time I am in LAS
      
      
      Fly safe
      
      
      John G. Cumins
      
      President
      
      
      JC'S Interactive Systems
      
      2499 B1 Martin Rd
      
      Fairfield Ca 94533
      
      707-425-7100
      
      707-425-7576 Fax
      
      
      Your Total Technology Solution Provider
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com 
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rick Sked
      Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 12:02 PM
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Flap positioning system
      
      
      If I did it again I think I would rather have more control over exactly 
      how much down flap I could use past zero. At times full is too much and 
      1/2 is not enough but I'm just being picky I suppose. I do like the zero 
      setting for take off vs. the reflex or -3 degree setting. I've found the 
      difference being at zero the aircraft just flies off without much back 
      pressure at all with an overall increase in climb performance. In the 
      reflex position you need a bit more pressure to rotate and take 
      off.....that extra one inch of pull is wearing me out! The system works 
      great though.
      
      
      Rick Sked
      
      N246RS
      
      Flying naked
      
      Painting the pants and fairings
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "Bob Condrey (US SSA)" <bob.condrey@baesystems.com>
      Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 11:42:21 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada 
      Pacific
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Flap positioning system
      
      That is exactly what you get =93 reflex, 0, =C2=BD and full.
      
      
      Bob
      
      N442PM
      
      
        _____  
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com 
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Kelly 
      McMullen
      Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 1:39 PM
      Subject: RV10-List: Flap positioning system
      
      
      For those who have the flap pre-select system: I am at stage to decide 
      whether I want this system or not. My question is whether it can be 
      adjusted to select reflex, trail, 1/2 and full flaps? Or can you only 
      get 10, 20, 30 degrees?
      Kelly
      40866
      QB arriving
      
      
      http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
      http://forums.matronics.com
      http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      
      
      get=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
      p://forums.matronics.com
      blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      
      
Message 31
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Flap positioning system | 
      
      Thanks everyone...exactly what I needed to know.
      
      On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Tim Olson <Tim@myrv10.com> wrote:
      
      >
      > I see no reason for any more than these 4 settings,
      > but by cutting a couple more notches you could
      > add a couple more steps if you really felt it necessary.
      > The way it flies though, I see no need for any more
      > than what it has now.  I think, but have not
      > measured, that it's reflex, 0, 15, 25
      >
      > Tim
      >
      >
      > Condrey, Bob (US SSA) wrote:
      >
      >> That is exactly what you get ' reflex, 0, =BD and full.
      >>
      >>
      >> Bob
      >>
      >> N442PM
      >>
      >>
      >>
      
Message 32
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Flap positioning system | 
      
      Ok for the people that don=99t have the FPS or have not used it 
      yet.  One point of order.  You can put your flaps at any setting from -3 
      degrees to full (?25 degrees).  All you have to do is go down to the 
      preset (anyone), then hit the up switch until it is at the desired 
      setting.
      
      
      Now, after 100 hours I have not needed to do that because my empty 
      weight CG is further aft than the Vans aircraft.  But when I was doing 
      my transition training, I was taught to put the flaps down, then bring 
      them up just a little, or else you run out of elevator trim for 
      landing
      
      
      Rene' Felker
      
      RV-10 N423CF Flying
      
      801-721-6080
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com 
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rick Sked
      Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 1:02 PM
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Flap positioning system
      
      
      If I did it again I think I would rather have more control over exactly 
      how much down flap I could use past zero. At times full is too much and 
      1/2 is not enough but I'm just being picky I suppose. I do like the zero 
      setting for take off vs. the reflex or -3 degree setting. I've found the 
      difference being at zero the aircraft just flies off without much back 
      pressure at all with an overall increase in climb performance. In the 
      reflex position you need a bit more pressure to rotate and take 
      off.....that extra one inch of pull is wearing me out! The system works 
      great though.
      
      
      Rick Sked
      
      N246RS
      
      Flying naked
      
      Painting the pants and fairings
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "Bob Condrey (US SSA)" <bob.condrey@baesystems.com>
      Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 11:42:21 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada 
      Pacific
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Flap positioning system
      
      That is exactly what you get =93 reflex, 0, =C2=BD and full.
      
      
      Bob
      
      N442PM
      
      
        _____  
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com 
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Kelly 
      McMullen
      Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 1:39 PM
      Subject: RV10-List: Flap positioning system
      
      
      For those who have the flap pre-select system: I am at stage to decide 
      whether I want this system or not. My question is whether it can be 
      adjusted to select reflex, trail, 1/2 and full flaps? Or can you only 
      get 10, 20, 30 degrees?
      Kelly
      40866
      QB arriving
      
      
      http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
      http://forums.matronics.com
      http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      
      
      get=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
      p://forums.matronics.com
      blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      
      
Message 33
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Flap positioning system | 
      
      
      Yes, you can stop the flaps anywhere mid travel by centering
      the switch.  Just yesterday I used it to give more partial
      flaps so I could take photos of the wife in the cherokee.
      you'd be amazed at how hard it is to fly side-by-side
      with a plane that doesn't WANT to stay that slow. Yes,
      the RV-10 flies nicely at slow speeds, but it cools better
      at higher speeds, so to try to maintain 90kts
      for 30 minutes, you have to pull out some tricks.  Partial
      flaps when needed aren't tough, even with a 4 stop positioner.
      
      Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD
      do not archive
      
      
      Rene Felker wrote:
      > Ok for the people that dont have the FPS or have not used it yet.  One 
      > point of order.  You can put your flaps at any setting from -3 degrees 
      > to full (?25 degrees).  All you have to do is go down to the preset 
      > (anyone), then hit the up switch until it is at the desired setting.
      > 
      >  
      > 
      > Now, after 100 hours I have not needed to do that because my empty 
      > weight CG is further aft than the Vans aircraft.  But when I was doing 
      > my transition training, I was taught to put the flaps down, then bring 
      > them up just a little, or else you run out of elevator trim for landing
      > 
      >  
      > 
      > Rene' Felker
      > 
      > RV-10 N423CF Flying
      > 
      > 801-721-6080
      > 
      > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com 
      > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Rick Sked
      > *Sent:* Friday, September 25, 2009 1:02 PM
      > *To:* rv10-list@matronics.com
      > *Subject:* Re: RV10-List: Flap positioning system
      > 
      >  
      > 
      > If I did it again I think I would rather have more control over exactly 
      > how much down flap I could use past zero. At times full is too much and 
      > 1/2 is not enough but I'm just being picky I suppose. I do like the zero 
      > setting for take off vs. the reflex or -3 degree setting. I've found the 
      > difference being at zero the aircraft just flies off without much back 
      > pressure at all with an overall increase in climb performance. In 
      > the reflex position you need a bit more pressure to rotate and take 
      > off.....that extra one inch of pull is wearing me out! The system works 
      > great though.
      > 
      >  
      > 
      > Rick Sked
      > 
      > N246RS
      > 
      > Flying naked
      > 
      > Painting the pants and fairings
      > ----- Original Message -----
      > From: "Bob Condrey (US SSA)" <bob.condrey@baesystems.com>
      > To: rv10-list@matronics.com
      > Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 11:42:21 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
      > Subject: RE: RV10-List: Flap positioning system
      > 
      > That is exactly what you get  reflex, 0,  and full.
      > 
      >  
      > 
      > Bob
      > 
      > N442PM
      > 
      >  
      > 
      > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
      > 
      > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com 
      > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Kelly McMullen
      > *Sent:* Friday, September 25, 2009 1:39 PM
      > *To:* rv10-list@matronics.com
      > *Subject:* RV10-List: Flap positioning system
      > 
      >  
      > 
      > For those who have the flap pre-select system: I am at stage to decide 
      > whether I want this system or not. My question is whether it can be 
      > adjusted to select reflex, trail, 1/2 and full flaps? Or can you only 
      > get 10, 20, 30 degrees?
      > Kelly
      > 40866
      > QB arriving
      > 
      > * *
      > 
      > * *
      > 
      > *http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List*
      > 
      > *http://forums.matronics.com*
      > 
      > *http://www.matronics.com/contribution*
      > 
      > * *
      > 
      > * *
      > 
      > * *
      > 
      > *get=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List*
      > 
      > *p://forums.matronics.com*
      > 
      > *blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution*
      > 
      > * *
      > 
      > * *
      > 
      > * *
      > 
      > **
      > 
      > **
      > 
      > **
      > 
      > **
      > 
      > **
      > 
      > **
      > 
      > *http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List*
      > 
      > **
      > 
      > **
      > 
      > **
      > 
      > *http://forums.matronics.com*
      > 
      > **
      > 
      > **
      > 
      > **
      > 
      > **
      > 
      > *http://www.matronics.com/contribution*
      > 
      > **
      > 
      > * *
      > 
      > *
      > 
      > 
      > *
      
      
Message 34
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Here is an alternative alternative...
      
      http://www.painttheweb.com/rv-10/aeroxO2.htm
      
      
      The set up here is a primary battery that we ingeniously labeled #1 and 
      a Back Up Battery labeled... you guessed it #2. Under power we only 
      charge #1 and #2 receives a trickle charge from #1. On my panel I have 
      two covered switches labeled Batt 1+2 & Batt 2(e). In general I use #1 
      exclusively  for starting and all normal operations. In that case both 
      toggles are in the off position and the Master/Batt pulls from Batt #1 
      exclusively. If it's extra cold or I have goofed up and left the master 
      on or drained #1 for any reason I can switch to Batt 1+2 to start the 
      plane with both batteries or I can switch Batt 2(e) to start the plane 
      with the second battery only. The Batt #2(e) is designated as the 
      electrical source to drive the Essential Buss only in case of an 
      emergency where I only need my Essential avionics (PFD, Comm 1, Nav 1, 
      Cappuccino Machine, etc). Additionally there is a 3rd battery integrated 
      in my backup Dynon 100 incase my Cappuccino Machine blows the entire 
      electrical system. So far so good. I think we will rotate #1 & #2 every 
      conditional inspection.
      
      
      http://www.painttheweb.com/rv-10/avionics.htm 
      
      
      Robin
      
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com 
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of David McNeill
      Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 8:57 AM
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Chargers
      
      
      here's another alternative
      
      
      ________________________________
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com 
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of RV Builder 
      (Michael Sausen)
      Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 7:18 AM
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Chargers
      
        It's a pretty easy mod to use a pair of 680's in the stock location.  
      Several of us have done it and you can still use a single contactor if 
      you want.
      
      
      Michael
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com 
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of David McNeill
      Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 8:01 PM
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Chargers
      
      
      
      
      No to the 680s without mod; too wide; also probably need additional 
      master
      
      contactor to use either or both batteries.
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of McGann, Ron
      
      Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 4:44 PM
      
      
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Chargers
      
      
      
      --> <Ron.McGann@thalesgroup.com.au>
      
      
      I have posted previously on poor cranking performance.  I have had an 
      issue
      
      with slow cranking ever since first start.  My battery failed completely 
      two
      
      weeks ago.  I firmly believe my original (Concorde) battery was stuffed 
      from
      
      the start and never really held a full charge - would not buy another.  
      Have
      
      not been able to get a PC925 locally yet, so used a Dekka sealed gel 
      cell as
      
      a temp measure.  Same size as the Concorde with 380CCA.  Could not 
      believe
      
      how quickly the prop spun with a decent battery. 
      
      
      When finalising my avionics integration, I used a 20Amp 13.2VDC power 
      supply
      
      in parallel with the battery to prevent constant discharge.  I need to 
      do
      
      some more research, but it would not surprise me if this contributed to 
      the
      
      failure of the battery by overcharging it.
      
      
      BTW, is it possible to fit two 680s in the standard tray without
      
      modification?
      
      
      Cheers
      
      Ron
      
      
      VH-XRM, flying in Oz
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Saint
      
      Sent: Friday, 25 September 2009 3:44 AM
      
      
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Chargers
      
      
      I only put a charge on when I'm working on avionics or something without 
      the
      
      engine running.  Every once in a while, if the plane has been sitting 
      for a
      
      while, I'll throw a charger on it just to make sure it is up to 
      cranking.
      
      Never had a problem.  I use the Concord standard battery that Van's 
      makes
      
      the tray for.
      
      
      do not archive
      
      
      Jesse Saint
      
      Saint Aviation, Inc.
      
      jesse@saintaviation.com
      
      Cell: 352-427-0285
      
      Fax: 815-377-3694
      
      
      On Sep 24, 2009, at 1:23 PM, Ande Boyer wrote:
      
      
      > Here's a noob question for you guys (I'm in the "prebuild/ 
      
      > investigation" phase of my RV-10 ;-)....
      
      > 
      
      > It sounds like you guys have a battery charger as standard equipment. 
      
      > Why is this? Does the battery that goes in the RV-10 not hold a 
      
      > charge?  Or is there some kind of current leak?
      
      > 
      
      > I've got a Warrior atm and we have no problem going weeks w/o running 
      
      > it and it always cranks up just fine.
      
      > 
      
      > Just wondering.....I've only been on this list for about 3 days and 
      
      > have already learned so much.
      
      > 
      
      > Thanks,
      
      > Ande Boyer
      
      > Huntsville, AL
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Dawson-Townsend,Timothy 
      
      > <tdawson-townsend@aurora.aero
      
      > > wrote:
      
      > What are folks following for a battery-charging philosophy?  I am 
      
      > using Odyssey PC680s (who isn't?), and was wondering if folks are 
      
      > trickle charging all the time when you're in the hangar, only when not 
      
      
      > expecting to fly for a while, or only when it's winter, etc.
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > Please share your thoughts.
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > TDT
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > Tim Dawson-Townsend
      
      > 
      
      > Aurora Flight Sciences
      
      > 
      
      > tdt@aurora.aero
      
      > 
      
      > 617-500-4812 (office)
      
      > 
      
      > 617-905-4800 (mobile)
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
      
      > ttp://forums.matronics.com
      
      > _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > --
      
      > "Pilots are a rare kind of human. They leave the ordinary surface of 
      
      > the world, to purify their soul in the sky, and they come down to 
      
      > earth, only after receiving the communion of the infinite." - Jos=E9 
      
      > Maria Velasco Ibarra
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      
      DISCLAIMER:--------------------------------------------------------------
      ---
      
      ----------
      
      This e-mail transmission and any documents, files and previous e-mail
      
      messages attached to it are private and confidential. They may contain
      
      proprietary or copyright material or information that is subject to 
      legal
      
      professional privilege. They are for the use of the intended recipient 
      only.
      
      Any unauthorised viewing, use, disclosure, copying, alteration, storage 
      or
      
      distribution of, or reliance on, this message is strictly prohibited. No
      
      part may be reproduced, adapted or transmitted without the written
      
      permission of the owner. If you have received this transmission in 
      error, or
      
      are not an authorised recipient, please immediately notify the sender by
      
      return email, delete this message and all copies from your e-mail 
      system,
      
      and destroy any printed copies. Receipt by anyone other than the 
      intended
      
      recipient should not be deemed a waiver of any privilege or protection.
      
      Thales Australia does not warrant or represent that this e-mail or any
      
      documents, files and previous e-mail messages attached are error or 
      virus
      
      free.
      
      -------------------------------------------------------------------------
      ---
      
      ----------
      
      
      =================== 
      
      ail Forum - 
      
      browse 
      
      ription, 
      
      Chat, FAQ, 
      
      > or?RV10-List 
      
      =================== 
      
      ATRONICS WEB FORUMS - 
      
      Forums! 
      
      =================== 
      
      ntribution Web Site - 
      
      /o:p> 
      
                     -Matt Dralle, List Admin. 
      
      ution 
      
      =================== 
      
      
Message 35
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      I went to the Battery Minder manufacturer site and looked at the available
      tech manuals. There are about 4 aviation specific options for the battery
      models. These are idiot proof. The Odyssey specific model always uses the 8A
      option and battery type selection is fixed. Therefore making a mistake
      charging an Odyssey battery is not possible. Buy the 12248 standard model
      and press the correct buttons; its cheaper.
      
Message 36
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Aviation consumer recommends the Battery Minder (VDC); not the Battery
      Tender (Deltran):
      
      
      http://www.batteryminders.com/batterycharger/press_room/battery-chargers-vdc
      -wins-in-a-walk.pdf
      
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Miller John
      Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 8:09 PM
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Chargers
      
      
      Been using Battery Tenders on my Odyssey 680s for several years now with no
      problems.
      
      
      It was recommended in Aviation Consumer as well as Light Plane Maintenance.
      
      
      grumpy
      
      N184JM
      
      
      do not archive
      
      
      On Sep 24, 2009, at 8:03 PM, Brian wrote:
      
      
      Avoid using the Battery Tender on sealed aircraft batteries.  It chewed up
      two Concorde's in less than a year before I wised up (afterwards I also
      switched to the PC925).  I would recommend going with a charger that was
      specifically designed for that type of battery:
      
      
       http://www.batteryminders.com/specials.php
      
      
      Brian
      
      RV-10 N104BS
      
      Nashville, TN
      
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Don McDonald
      Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 6:54 PM
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Chargers
      
      
      A very smart friend of mone turned me on to a charger called a "Battery
      Minder".  Look it up online.  Cost around $50.  Not only trickle charges,
      but sends out pulses that keep sulfides from forming.  The friends 210 has
      not replaced his battery in over 10 years... whereas before they seemed to
      last 3 or 4 years.  I use them on cars stored, motorcycles, boats, and my
      plane.
      
      Don McDonald
      
      Plane parked.... on the boat......... wishing I was flying! 
      
      --- On Thu, 9/24/09, Linn Walters <pitts_pilot@bellsouth.net> wrote:
      
      
      From: Linn Walters <pitts_pilot@bellsouth.net>
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Chargers
      
      <http://us.mc537.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=pitts_pilot@bellsouth.net> >
      
      I leave my birds on the trickle charge almost all of the time .....
      exception is when I'm in a hurry to lock up or just plain forget.
      Linn
      
      Dawson-Townsend,Timothy wrote:
      > What are folks following for a battery-charging philosophy?  I am using
      Odyssey PC680s (who isn't?), and was wondering if folks are trickle charging
      all the time when you're in the hangar, only when not expecting to fly for a
      while, or only when it's winter, etc.
      > 
      >  
      > Please share your thoughts.
      > 
      > 
      > TDT
      > 
      >  
      > Tim Dawson-Townsend
      > 
      > Aurora Flight Sciences
      > 
      > tdt@aurora.aero
      <http://us.mc537.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=tdt@aurora.aero>
      <mailto:tdt@aurora.aero
      <http://us.mc537.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=tdt@aurora.aero> >
      > 
      > 617-500-4812 (office)
      > 
      > 617-905-4800 (mobile)
      > 
      >  Navigator Photoshare, and
      href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com
      /Navigator?RV10-List Web
      href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.comhref="http://w
      ww.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c ==========
      
      
      ===================================
      yle="color: blue; text-decoration: underline;
      ">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
      ===================================
      e; text-decoration: underline; ">http://forums.matronics.com
      ===================================
      color: blue; text-decoration: underline;
      ">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      ===================================
      
      
      = 
      
      
Message 37
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Flap positioning system | 
      
      During transition training Alex D. demonstrated that it actually takes abou
      t 200-300 feet more roll on takeoff if in reflex instead of 0.
      
      Bob
      
      ________________________________
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@m
      atronics.com] On Behalf Of Rick Sked
      Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 2:02 PM
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Flap positioning system
      
      
      If I did it again I think I would rather have more control over exactly how
       much down flap I could use past zero. At times full is too much and 1/2 is
       not enough but I'm just being picky I suppose. I do like the zero setting 
      for take off vs. the reflex or -3 degree setting. I've found the difference
       being at zero the aircraft just flies off without much back pressure at al
      l with an overall increase in climb performance. In the reflex position you
       need a bit more pressure to rotate and take off.....that extra one inch of
       pull is wearing me out! The system works great though.
      
      
      Rick Sked
      
      N246RS
      
      Flying naked
      
      Painting the pants and fairings
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "Bob Condrey (US SSA)" <bob.condrey@baesystems.com>
      Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 11:42:21 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Flap positioning system
      That is exactly what you get - reflex, 0, =BD and full.
      
      Bob
      N442PM
      
      ________________________________
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@m
      atronics.com] On Behalf Of Kelly McMullen
      Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 1:39 PM
      Subject: RV10-List: Flap positioning system
      
      For those who have the flap pre-select system: I am at stage to decide whet
      her I want this system or not. My question is whether it can be adjusted to
       select reflex, trail, 1/2 and full flaps? Or can you only get 10, 20, 30 d
      egrees?
      Kelly
      40866
      QB arriving
      
      
      http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
      
      http://forums.matronics.com
      
      http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      
      
      get=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
      
      p://forums.matronics.com
      
      blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      
      
Message 38
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | G-900 fees, dues, subscriptions | 
      
      
      Did my BFR this week in the 6A and spent some ground time with a G1000 
      system, thus renewing my enthusiasm for installing a G 900 in the 10.  I 
      know as a group we are fortunate to now have several 900 drivers out there - 
      Robin, Gary, and more!  For those of us still contemplating panel choices 
      would you guys please let us know what the fees ( costs in subscriptions, 
      XM, etc) are in keeping this 900 going and up to date.   Also, what is the 
      mininum cost one may need to look forword to in VFR vrs IFR.  Details would 
      sure be helpful like:  "Charts and plates are $XXX,  XM weather is $XXX, 
      traffic is $XXX,  Other is $XXX - all per month.  My annual fees are about 
      $XXX".  Do you have NAV-WRX etc?
      Appreciate any input from you guys!  Thanks so much.
      
      Rich
      RV-6A 1000 hours
      RV-10 Finishing kit - gear & wheel fairings 
      
      
Message 39
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | G-900 fees, dues, subscriptions | 
      
      
      Rich,
      	I am just going through the update process / potential
      nightmare. I can't say enough good things about how the GH900X performs
      especially with the SVT (synthetic terrain), TIS Traffic (where
      available) and XM WX (plus Audio).
      	First the Fees. If you want to be completely up to date all the
      time here are the fees. I didn't write down the individual fees as the
      annual fees are 2-3 times the price for 10-13 times the data. Data is
      provided by two (2) different companies through Three (3) different
      delivery systems (of course).
      
      DataBase Costs:
      
      Jeppesen 800-553-7750/303-799-9090
      Airport/Nav/Freq/Waypoint Data etc = $410.00 full US (annual) (partial
      US is about $300)
      
      Garmin Data (annual):
      Safe Taxi		$195
      Obstacles		$195
      Flight Charts	$395	
      		     ~$800.00	Total
      
      Terrain		$150		Occasional Random Updates ~1.5-2 years
      
      Assuming random & occasional Terrain updates the total annual DB update
      is $410 + $800 = $1,210.00/year. Depending on the type of flying you do
      you may be able to save by postponing Safe Taxi which is a tremendous
      feature but I am unsure how critical these small changes are over the
      years relative to the costs. PLEASE no flaming me, just a suggestion to
      save a few $ for some that have regular commutes. 
      
      Obviously the two different companies are Jeppesen & Garmin and the
      Download process is simple from Jeppesen and simple for Garmin but from
      two different places "MyGarmin.com" for technical manuals, System
      Updates etc... and Fly.Garmin.com for purchasing & downloading
      Taxi/Obstacles/Charts.
      
      Unfortunately there are some issues I am having with Garmin that border
      on disturbing. The knowledgeable technical support is near non-existent.
      When you call Garmin they answer with minimal hold times. GREAT! You
      explain your issues completely and then they tell you they can't answer
      your question and transfer you to a Field Service Representative that
      SHOULD be versed in the G900X. You explain one more time your issue and
      they hem and haw and tell you that you should really speak with the
      G900X expert Tim. They transfer you to Tim whom I suspect it the most
      overworked person at Garmin and with any luck he will answer your
      questions but he is rarely available on the phone and will usually email
      you back. Now Tim is excellent, knowledgeable and very friendly but he
      seems to be the only person qualified to help. Let me give you a recent
      example of some frustrating Garmin processes. 
      
      Initially my Garmin would not speak with my ($10,000) Sorcerer AP for
      flying a heading. You could set & adjust the heading on the AP and it
      would fly but not set or change it on the G900X and have it speak to the
      AP to fly that heading. I spoke with Tim via email and after some
      research we discovered that a recent System Software version addressed
      the issue and all I had to do was upgrade the System Software (here
      after SS = System Software) I had 006-00718-04 and needed to upgrade to
      006-00718-05. Problem solved... Right... Well not exactly. How the
      %(*&^@$! do you update the SS? Obviously you look in the 500 page Pilots
      Guide. Fortunately it's in PDF form so after reading it front to back
      again and looking for the procedure I contacted Tim who told me I would
      find the procedure in the Installation Manual. Cool... All relevant
      documents are housed at MyGarmin.com so I downloaded the Installation
      Manual (hereafter IM) and read all 500 pages with not a word on
      installing the SS. Geezzzz. I called Tim again and he emailed me that
      the instructions were in section 15.1.2. Ohhhh that explains it, my IM
      ends at 14.something.something. At this point I don't really feel I need
      to control the Heading from the Heading knob on the Garmin. But I press
      on. I ask Tim why I don't automatically have the latest IM in MyGarmin
      as that is the place Garmin automatically updates all owners documents
      so everyone is current. Apparently they have a few glitches on the auto
      document population process. How much is this G900X again? I get the
      latest IM and go straight to section 15.1.2 and start reading the SS
      install process. The actual loading of the SS SEEMS pretty straight
      forward with the exception of the 3rd paragraph where you are instructed
      to clear all User Settings. Sounds innocent enough, User Settings
      (hereafter U-S). The U-S are all your saved flight plans, all your
      customized PFD/MFD settings and all your calibrations. WHAT? All your
      calibrations??? That includes fuel, trim, flap etc... That has to be
      wrong. There is no way Garmin would have you clear those w/o a way to
      save and reinstall these settings. As part of the G900X purchase
      included is a Certified G900X technician to calibrate and approve the
      install at your location. As I was one of the first Tim and another tech
      spent 2 days getting my system up and running and had to come back one
      more time as they didn't have a tool to test some avionics required.
      That is a 3 day out of town visit to approve the system and now they
      want you to wipe out all the settings for a simple system upgrade.
      Now granted the System Upgrades are fantastic as they keep adding
      features like CHT/EGT data logging, moving items around based on user
      suggestions etc... but no way can I wipe out the calibrations. There
      must be some mistake but I am still waiting for an answer before I wipe
      out all those settings. Did I mention I am still waiting?
      
      As a user interface systems designer all these processes sure seem
      unfriendly compared to how they could have been designed with what
      amounts to a system like we have on some of our smart phones but
      NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO (picture John Belushi) this is more DOS like for some
      unthinkable reason. Game of Pong anyone?
      
      Since this issue is not resolved I am reserving judgment on the
      data/calibrations loss problem till I have final word but as you can
      tell from my experience so far simple answers are not readily available.
      
      
      My one BIG piece of security is that this is a Garmin product and I am
      sure they will be around vs. spending a bucket full of $ and having it
      go all OP on me. You know me.... Mr. Glass Half Full...
      
      One more thing. I know Tim has found a way to keep his Chelton up to
      date for a fraction of what the Garmin/Jeppersen people are spending.
      Including purchasing a lifetime deal on some updates that is impossible
      to beat. 
      
      I have more to say but I am heading to the airport for a night flight
      back to SBP.
      
      Robin 
      
      
      -----Original Message -----
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
      karolamy@roadrunner.com
      Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 3:41 PM
      Subject: RV10-List: G-900 fees, dues, subscriptions
      
      
      Did my BFR this week in the 6A and spent some ground time with a G1000 
      system, thus renewing my enthusiasm for installing a G 900 in the 10.  I
      
      know as a group we are fortunate to now have several 900 drivers out
      there - 
      Robin, Gary, and more!  For those of us still contemplating panel
      choices 
      would you guys please let us know what the fees ( costs in
      subscriptions, 
      XM, etc) are in keeping this 900 going and up to date.   Also, what is
      the 
      mininum cost one may need to look forword to in VFR vrs IFR.  Details
      would 
      sure be helpful like:  "Charts and plates are $XXX,  XM weather is $XXX,
      
      traffic is $XXX,  Other is $XXX - all per month.  My annual fees are
      about 
      $XXX".  Do you have NAV-WRX etc?
      Appreciate any input from you guys!  Thanks so much.
      
      Rich
      RV-6A 1000 hours
      RV-10 Finishing kit - gear & wheel fairings 
      
      
Message 40
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: G-900 fees, dues, subscriptions | 
      
      
      Keep blazin' the trails Robin...
      
      Dave Leikam
      RV-10 #40496
      N89DA
      Muskego, WI
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "Robin Marks" <robin1@mrmoisture.com>
      Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 8:16 PM
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: G-900 fees, dues, subscriptions
      
      
      > 
      > Rich,
      > I am just going through the update process / potential
      > nightmare. I can't say enough good things about how the GH900X performs
      > especially with the SVT (synthetic terrain), TIS Traffic (where
      > available) and XM WX (plus Audio).
      > First the Fees. If you want to be completely up to date all the
      > time here are the fees. I didn't write down the individual fees as the
      > annual fees are 2-3 times the price for 10-13 times the data. Data is
      > provided by two (2) different companies through Three (3) different
      > delivery systems (of course).
      > 
      > DataBase Costs:
      > 
      > Jeppesen 800-553-7750/303-799-9090
      > Airport/Nav/Freq/Waypoint Data etc = $410.00 full US (annual) (partial
      > US is about $300)
      > 
      > Garmin Data (annual):
      > Safe Taxi $195
      > Obstacles $195
      > Flight Charts $395 
      >      ~$800.00 Total
      > 
      > Terrain $150 Occasional Random Updates ~1.5-2 years
      > 
      > Assuming random & occasional Terrain updates the total annual DB update
      > is $410 + $800 = $1,210.00/year. Depending on the type of flying you do
      > you may be able to save by postponing Safe Taxi which is a tremendous
      > feature but I am unsure how critical these small changes are over the
      > years relative to the costs. PLEASE no flaming me, just a suggestion to
      > save a few $ for some that have regular commutes. 
      > 
      > Obviously the two different companies are Jeppesen & Garmin and the
      > Download process is simple from Jeppesen and simple for Garmin but from
      > two different places "MyGarmin.com" for technical manuals, System
      > Updates etc... and Fly.Garmin.com for purchasing & downloading
      > Taxi/Obstacles/Charts.
      > 
      > Unfortunately there are some issues I am having with Garmin that border
      > on disturbing. The knowledgeable technical support is near non-existent.
      > When you call Garmin they answer with minimal hold times. GREAT! You
      > explain your issues completely and then they tell you they can't answer
      > your question and transfer you to a Field Service Representative that
      > SHOULD be versed in the G900X. You explain one more time your issue and
      > they hem and haw and tell you that you should really speak with the
      > G900X expert Tim. They transfer you to Tim whom I suspect it the most
      > overworked person at Garmin and with any luck he will answer your
      > questions but he is rarely available on the phone and will usually email
      > you back. Now Tim is excellent, knowledgeable and very friendly but he
      > seems to be the only person qualified to help. Let me give you a recent
      > example of some frustrating Garmin processes. 
      > 
      > Initially my Garmin would not speak with my ($10,000) Sorcerer AP for
      > flying a heading. You could set & adjust the heading on the AP and it
      > would fly but not set or change it on the G900X and have it speak to the
      > AP to fly that heading. I spoke with Tim via email and after some
      > research we discovered that a recent System Software version addressed
      > the issue and all I had to do was upgrade the System Software (here
      > after SS = System Software) I had 006-00718-04 and needed to upgrade to
      > 006-00718-05. Problem solved... Right... Well not exactly. How the
      > %(*&^@$! do you update the SS? Obviously you look in the 500 page Pilots
      > Guide. Fortunately it's in PDF form so after reading it front to back
      > again and looking for the procedure I contacted Tim who told me I would
      > find the procedure in the Installation Manual. Cool... All relevant
      > documents are housed at MyGarmin.com so I downloaded the Installation
      > Manual (hereafter IM) and read all 500 pages with not a word on
      > installing the SS. Geezzzz. I called Tim again and he emailed me that
      > the instructions were in section 15.1.2. Ohhhh that explains it, my IM
      > ends at 14.something.something. At this point I don't really feel I need
      > to control the Heading from the Heading knob on the Garmin. But I press
      > on. I ask Tim why I don't automatically have the latest IM in MyGarmin
      > as that is the place Garmin automatically updates all owners documents
      > so everyone is current. Apparently they have a few glitches on the auto
      > document population process. How much is this G900X again? I get the
      > latest IM and go straight to section 15.1.2 and start reading the SS
      > install process. The actual loading of the SS SEEMS pretty straight
      > forward with the exception of the 3rd paragraph where you are instructed
      > to clear all User Settings. Sounds innocent enough, User Settings
      > (hereafter U-S). The U-S are all your saved flight plans, all your
      > customized PFD/MFD settings and all your calibrations. WHAT? All your
      > calibrations??? That includes fuel, trim, flap etc... That has to be
      > wrong. There is no way Garmin would have you clear those w/o a way to
      > save and reinstall these settings. As part of the G900X purchase
      > included is a Certified G900X technician to calibrate and approve the
      > install at your location. As I was one of the first Tim and another tech
      > spent 2 days getting my system up and running and had to come back one
      > more time as they didn't have a tool to test some avionics required.
      > That is a 3 day out of town visit to approve the system and now they
      > want you to wipe out all the settings for a simple system upgrade.
      > Now granted the System Upgrades are fantastic as they keep adding
      > features like CHT/EGT data logging, moving items around based on user
      > suggestions etc... but no way can I wipe out the calibrations. There
      > must be some mistake but I am still waiting for an answer before I wipe
      > out all those settings. Did I mention I am still waiting?
      > 
      > As a user interface systems designer all these processes sure seem
      > unfriendly compared to how they could have been designed with what
      > amounts to a system like we have on some of our smart phones but
      > NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO (picture John Belushi) this is more DOS like for some
      > unthinkable reason. Game of Pong anyone?
      > 
      > Since this issue is not resolved I am reserving judgment on the
      > data/calibrations loss problem till I have final word but as you can
      > tell from my experience so far simple answers are not readily available.
      > 
      > 
      > My one BIG piece of security is that this is a Garmin product and I am
      > sure they will be around vs. spending a bucket full of $ and having it
      > go all OP on me. You know me.... Mr. Glass Half Full...
      > 
      > One more thing. I know Tim has found a way to keep his Chelton up to
      > date for a fraction of what the Garmin/Jeppersen people are spending.
      > Including purchasing a lifetime deal on some updates that is impossible
      > to beat. 
      > 
      > I have more to say but I am heading to the airport for a night flight
      > back to SBP.
      > 
      > Robin 
      > 
      > 
      > -----Original Message -----
      > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
      > karolamy@roadrunner.com
      > Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 3:41 PM
      > To: rv10-list@matronics.com
      > Subject: RV10-List: G-900 fees, dues, subscriptions
      > 
      > 
      > Did my BFR this week in the 6A and spent some ground time with a G1000 
      > system, thus renewing my enthusiasm for installing a G 900 in the 10.  I
      > 
      > know as a group we are fortunate to now have several 900 drivers out
      > there - 
      > Robin, Gary, and more!  For those of us still contemplating panel
      > choices 
      > would you guys please let us know what the fees ( costs in
      > subscriptions, 
      > XM, etc) are in keeping this 900 going and up to date.   Also, what is
      > the 
      > mininum cost one may need to look forword to in VFR vrs IFR.  Details
      > would 
      > sure be helpful like:  "Charts and plates are $XXX,  XM weather is $XXX,
      > 
      > traffic is $XXX,  Other is $XXX - all per month.  My annual fees are
      > about 
      > $XXX".  Do you have NAV-WRX etc?
      > Appreciate any input from you guys!  Thanks so much.
      > 
      > Rich
      > RV-6A 1000 hours
      > RV-10 Finishing kit - gear & wheel fairings 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      >
      
      
Message 41
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: G-900 fees, dues, subscriptions | 
      
      
      One clarification on the updates that Robin is referring to that
      I do for the Chelton...    I pay about $500/yr I think for
      the updates for my GNS-480 and my Chelton systems combined.
      This is NavData, and obstructions. From time to time I guess
      they have Terrain updates but as terrain rarely changes, I've
      never actually had one.  I don't have smart taxi, or charts on
      the system.  The lifetime deal that he talked about was actually
      a one-time promo that Voyager ran for the first 100 customers
      to reply to an email offer.....a lifetime of EFB chart
      subscription for $600.  So, for charts, I use Voyager, which
      has Geo-referenced WAC/TAC/SECTIONAL/IFR(low and high) charts
      and geo-referenced approach plates, all integrated to GPS to
      plot your position...and I use it on an older LE1600 with a
      SSD.  For me, that works perfectly for what I need for approaches.
      The chelton contains most of the info I need, but usually you
      still have to look up the minimums for the approach, so
      after a quick look at the plate, I can usually just fly it
      without the tablet if I choose to.  In fact, now that I've
      grown attached at the hip to my iphone with Foreflight, I
      lately have just been looking at the approach plate on that,
      for all of my practice...saving the tablet for those real
      IFR times.  The Voyager deal was a 1-time thing, so for most
      people you'll have an annual subscription just like I used
      to for a couple years....but for all the charts you get,
      there's not any more effective way to carry all the
      charts and have all that function.  Voyager even has HITS.
      They have a new promo going too, where you can buy a whole
      pre-loaded tablet for something like $1000 that comes with
      the software and everything, and a 3 month sub. It looks to
      be a great way to start it.  The only caveat is, no matter
      what you do for a PC in the plane, definitely do it with
      a SSD hard drive. Far superior for what we do.
      
      Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD
      
      
      Robin Marks wrote:
      > 
      > Rich,
      > 	I am just going through the update process / potential
      > nightmare. I can't say enough good things about how the GH900X performs
      > especially with the SVT (synthetic terrain), TIS Traffic (where
      > available) and XM WX (plus Audio).
      > 	First the Fees. If you want to be completely up to date all the
      > time here are the fees. I didn't write down the individual fees as the
      > annual fees are 2-3 times the price for 10-13 times the data. Data is
      > provided by two (2) different companies through Three (3) different
      > delivery systems (of course).
      > 
      > DataBase Costs:
      > 
      > Jeppesen 800-553-7750/303-799-9090
      > Airport/Nav/Freq/Waypoint Data etc = $410.00 full US (annual) (partial
      > US is about $300)
      > 
      > Garmin Data (annual):
      > Safe Taxi		$195
      > Obstacles		$195
      > Flight Charts	$395	
      > 		     ~$800.00	Total
      > 
      > Terrain		$150		Occasional Random Updates ~1.5-2 years
      > 
      > Assuming random & occasional Terrain updates the total annual DB update
      > is $410 + $800 = $1,210.00/year. Depending on the type of flying you do
      > you may be able to save by postponing Safe Taxi which is a tremendous
      > feature but I am unsure how critical these small changes are over the
      > years relative to the costs. PLEASE no flaming me, just a suggestion to
      > save a few $ for some that have regular commutes. 
      > 
      > Obviously the two different companies are Jeppesen & Garmin and the
      > Download process is simple from Jeppesen and simple for Garmin but from
      > two different places "MyGarmin.com" for technical manuals, System
      > Updates etc... and Fly.Garmin.com for purchasing & downloading
      > Taxi/Obstacles/Charts.
      > 
      > Unfortunately there are some issues I am having with Garmin that border
      > on disturbing. The knowledgeable technical support is near non-existent.
      > When you call Garmin they answer with minimal hold times. GREAT! You
      > explain your issues completely and then they tell you they can't answer
      > your question and transfer you to a Field Service Representative that
      > SHOULD be versed in the G900X. You explain one more time your issue and
      > they hem and haw and tell you that you should really speak with the
      > G900X expert Tim. They transfer you to Tim whom I suspect it the most
      > overworked person at Garmin and with any luck he will answer your
      > questions but he is rarely available on the phone and will usually email
      > you back. Now Tim is excellent, knowledgeable and very friendly but he
      > seems to be the only person qualified to help. Let me give you a recent
      > example of some frustrating Garmin processes. 
      > 
      > Initially my Garmin would not speak with my ($10,000) Sorcerer AP for
      > flying a heading. You could set & adjust the heading on the AP and it
      > would fly but not set or change it on the G900X and have it speak to the
      > AP to fly that heading. I spoke with Tim via email and after some
      > research we discovered that a recent System Software version addressed
      > the issue and all I had to do was upgrade the System Software (here
      > after SS = System Software) I had 006-00718-04 and needed to upgrade to
      > 006-00718-05. Problem solved... Right... Well not exactly. How the
      > %(*&^@$! do you update the SS? Obviously you look in the 500 page Pilots
      > Guide. Fortunately it's in PDF form so after reading it front to back
      > again and looking for the procedure I contacted Tim who told me I would
      > find the procedure in the Installation Manual. Cool... All relevant
      > documents are housed at MyGarmin.com so I downloaded the Installation
      > Manual (hereafter IM) and read all 500 pages with not a word on
      > installing the SS. Geezzzz. I called Tim again and he emailed me that
      > the instructions were in section 15.1.2. Ohhhh that explains it, my IM
      > ends at 14.something.something. At this point I don't really feel I need
      > to control the Heading from the Heading knob on the Garmin. But I press
      > on. I ask Tim why I don't automatically have the latest IM in MyGarmin
      > as that is the place Garmin automatically updates all owners documents
      > so everyone is current. Apparently they have a few glitches on the auto
      > document population process. How much is this G900X again? I get the
      > latest IM and go straight to section 15.1.2 and start reading the SS
      > install process. The actual loading of the SS SEEMS pretty straight
      > forward with the exception of the 3rd paragraph where you are instructed
      > to clear all User Settings. Sounds innocent enough, User Settings
      > (hereafter U-S). The U-S are all your saved flight plans, all your
      > customized PFD/MFD settings and all your calibrations. WHAT? All your
      > calibrations??? That includes fuel, trim, flap etc... That has to be
      > wrong. There is no way Garmin would have you clear those w/o a way to
      > save and reinstall these settings. As part of the G900X purchase
      > included is a Certified G900X technician to calibrate and approve the
      > install at your location. As I was one of the first Tim and another tech
      > spent 2 days getting my system up and running and had to come back one
      > more time as they didn't have a tool to test some avionics required.
      > That is a 3 day out of town visit to approve the system and now they
      > want you to wipe out all the settings for a simple system upgrade.
      > Now granted the System Upgrades are fantastic as they keep adding
      > features like CHT/EGT data logging, moving items around based on user
      > suggestions etc... but no way can I wipe out the calibrations. There
      > must be some mistake but I am still waiting for an answer before I wipe
      > out all those settings. Did I mention I am still waiting?
      > 
      > As a user interface systems designer all these processes sure seem
      > unfriendly compared to how they could have been designed with what
      > amounts to a system like we have on some of our smart phones but
      > NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO (picture John Belushi) this is more DOS like for some
      > unthinkable reason. Game of Pong anyone?
      > 
      > Since this issue is not resolved I am reserving judgment on the
      > data/calibrations loss problem till I have final word but as you can
      > tell from my experience so far simple answers are not readily available.
      > 
      > 
      > My one BIG piece of security is that this is a Garmin product and I am
      > sure they will be around vs. spending a bucket full of $ and having it
      > go all OP on me. You know me.... Mr. Glass Half Full...
      > 
      > One more thing. I know Tim has found a way to keep his Chelton up to
      > date for a fraction of what the Garmin/Jeppersen people are spending.
      > Including purchasing a lifetime deal on some updates that is impossible
      > to beat. 
      > 
      > I have more to say but I am heading to the airport for a night flight
      > back to SBP.
      > 
      > Robin 
      > 
      > 
      > -----Original Message -----
      > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
      > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
      > karolamy@roadrunner.com
      > Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 3:41 PM
      > To: rv10-list@matronics.com
      > Subject: RV10-List: G-900 fees, dues, subscriptions
      > 
      > 
      > Did my BFR this week in the 6A and spent some ground time with a G1000 
      > system, thus renewing my enthusiasm for installing a G 900 in the 10.  I
      > 
      > know as a group we are fortunate to now have several 900 drivers out
      > there - 
      > Robin, Gary, and more!  For those of us still contemplating panel
      > choices 
      > would you guys please let us know what the fees ( costs in
      > subscriptions, 
      > XM, etc) are in keeping this 900 going and up to date.   Also, what is
      > the 
      > mininum cost one may need to look forword to in VFR vrs IFR.  Details
      > would 
      > sure be helpful like:  "Charts and plates are $XXX,  XM weather is $XXX,
      > 
      > traffic is $XXX,  Other is $XXX - all per month.  My annual fees are
      > about 
      > $XXX".  Do you have NAV-WRX etc?
      > Appreciate any input from you guys!  Thanks so much.
      > 
      > Rich
      > RV-6A 1000 hours
      > RV-10 Finishing kit - gear & wheel fairings 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      
      
Message 42
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Flap positioning system | 
      
      
      If you take off with the flaps in reflex and you have a problem that makes 
      you need to go slow as in engine failure=2C you will tip stall your wing in
      stead of allowing the inner portion of the wing to stall first. This would 
      not be a good thing.  At least with sailplane design and other aircraft=2C 
      tip stalling the wing is a bad thing.
      
      
      JOhn G
      
      
      From: bob.condrey@baesystems.com
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Flap positioning system
      
      
      During transition training Alex D. demonstrated that it actually takes abou
      t 200-300 feet more roll on takeoff if in reflex instead of 0.
      
      Bob
      
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@m
      atronics.com] On Behalf Of Rick Sked
      Sent: Friday=2C September 25=2C 2009 2:02 PM
      Subject: Re: RV10-List: Flap positioning system
      
      
      If I did it again I think I would rather have more control over exactly how
       much down flap I could use past zero. At times full is too much and 1/2 is
       not enough but I'm just being picky I suppose. I do like the zero setting 
      for take off vs. the reflex or -3 degree setting. I've found the difference
       being at zero the aircraft just flies off without much back pressure at al
      l with an overall increase in climb performance. In the reflex position you
       need a bit more pressure to rotate and take off.....that extra one inch of
       pull is wearing me out! The system works great though.
      
      
      Rick Sked
      
      N246RS
      
      Flying naked
      
      Painting the pants and fairings
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "Bob Condrey (US SSA)" <bob.condrey@baesystems.com>
      Sent: Friday=2C September 25=2C 2009 11:42:21 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacif
      ic
      Subject: RE: RV10-List: Flap positioning system
      That is exactly what you get ' reflex=2C 0=2C =BD and full.
      
      Bob
      N442PM
      
      
      From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@m
      atronics.com] On Behalf Of Kelly McMullen
      Sent: Friday=2C September 25=2C 2009 1:39 PM
      Subject: RV10-List: Flap positioning system
      
      For those who have the flap pre-select system: I am at stage to decide whet
      her I want this system or not. My question is whether it can be adjusted to
       select reflex=2C trail=2C 1/2 and full flaps? Or can you only get 10=2C 20
      =2C 30 degrees?
      Kelly
      40866
      QB arriving  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-Listhttp://forums.matr
      onics.comhttp://www.matronics.com/contribution   get=_blank>http://www.ma
      tronics.com/Navigator?RV10-Listp://forums.matronics.comblank>http://www.mat
      ronics.com/contribution   http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-Listhttp:
      //forums.matronics.comhttp://www.matronics.com/contribution 
      
      
       		 	   		  
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |