RV10-List Digest Archive

Fri 10/02/09


Total Messages Posted: 19



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 03:41 AM - Re: Another QB 10 Issue - Longeron Length (again) (Bob Leffler)
     2. 06:11 AM - Re: Another QB 10 Issue - Longeron Length (again) (Perry, Phil)
     3. 08:43 AM - Window Glue (RV Builder (Michael Sausen))
     4. 10:39 AM - Re: Control column mounts (Bob Turner)
     5. 11:18 AM - Re: Re: Control column mounts (Perry, Phil)
     6. 03:53 PM - Re: Re: Control column mounts (Rob Kochman)
     7. 04:21 PM - Door-I'm the guy. (John Koonce)
     8. 04:53 PM - Re: Door-I'm the guy. (David McNeill)
     9. 05:22 PM - Re: Door-I'm the guy. (ricksked@embarqmail.com)
    10. 05:29 PM - AFS - Alternator Warning (Jim)
    11. 06:11 PM - Re: Door-I'm the guy. (John Gonzalez)
    12. 06:18 PM - Re: Window Glue (John Gonzalez)
    13. 06:43 PM - Re: Door-I'm the guy. (David McNeill)
    14. 06:45 PM - Re: Door-I'm the guy. (ricksked@embarqmail.com)
    15. 07:15 PM - charger 12248 (David McNeill)
    16. 07:15 PM - Re: Door-I'm the guy. (Robert Brunkenhoefer)
    17. 07:26 PM - Re: AFS - Alternator Warning (Carl Froehlich)
    18. 09:04 PM - charger 12248 (David McNeill)
    19. 09:46 PM - Re: charger 12248 (Kelly McMullen)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:41:32 AM PST US
    From: "Bob Leffler" <rv@thelefflers.com>
    Subject: Another QB 10 Issue - Longeron Length (again)
    Phil, If I read your measurements correctly, I think you're spot on. My tailcone is mounted, but it was easy to measure since that longeron is on top and not covered by a skin. My measurement was 2-7/16". Bob From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Perry, Phil Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 9:01 PM Subject: RV10-List: Another QB 10 Issue - Longeron Length (again) Since I found some mid-fuse longerons that were too long, I thought I'd double check the primary ones that attach to the tailcone. Checking the lengths on those was something I never thought about doing. Good thing I did - or so I think. Attached is a photo of the right side longeron. The line in the photo is where I believe the longeron should be cut (49 23/32") per 29-2 Step #1. As you can see, the longerons are more than 4" too long. Which brings me to two interesting questions. 1) For those of you who have slow-built and not attached to the tailcone yet; How far do yours stick out past the side skin? Is my mark close to right? 2) I wonder how many other folks missed this step and now have an RV-10 QB's with the tailcone and fwd fuse attached at the wrong point. Phil


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:11:16 AM PST US
    Subject: Another QB 10 Issue - Longeron Length (again)
    From: "Perry, Phil" <Phil.Perry@netapp.com>
    Thanks Bob... I just threw the tape on there just to give you a sense of scale. I went out and measured from the skins edge to the line and I'm 1/16" shorter than yours. I'll add a 1/16th to it. Just didn't want to cut those things until I verified they really needed to be cut. That explains why they didn't pre-drill those pilot holes for attachment too.. Thanks, Phil From: Bob Leffler [mailto:rv@thelefflers.com] Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 5:43 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Another QB 10 Issue - Longeron Length (again) Phil, If I read your measurements correctly, I think you're spot on. My tailcone is mounted, but it was easy to measure since that longeron is on top and not covered by a skin. My measurement was 2-7/16". Bob From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Perry, Phil Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 9:01 PM Subject: RV10-List: Another QB 10 Issue - Longeron Length (again) Since I found some mid-fuse longerons that were too long, I thought I'd double check the primary ones that attach to the tailcone. Checking the lengths on those was something I never thought about doing. Good thing I did - or so I think. Attached is a photo of the right side longeron. The line in the photo is where I believe the longeron should be cut (49 23/32") per 29-2 Step #1. As you can see, the longerons are more than 4" too long. Which brings me to two interesting questions. 1) For those of you who have slow-built and not attached to the tailcone yet; How far do yours stick out past the side skin? Is my mark close to right? 2) I wonder how many other folks missed this step and now have an RV-10 QB's with the tailcone and fwd fuse attached at the wrong point. Phil


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:43:22 AM PST US
    From: "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)" <rvbuilder@sausen.net>
    Subject: Window Glue
    I thought I would share my experience with an alternative glue for adheri ng the windows. Based on a recommendation from Geoff Combs, I picked up so me Lord 7545A/E urethane adhesive rather than using the Weldon 10 we are al l familiar with. I did follow the standard process with the rear windows and after that ex perience, along with forgetting my shims in the rush, I thought I would loo k into the alternatives. After not really finding anything definitive from the existing alternatives like Sikaflex I basically resigned myself to use Weldon for the doors. As I got within a couple weeks of doing the door wi ndows Geoff had mentioned to me that he used something else for the window adhesive that was very much suited for the task and didn't have the quick c ure times and viscosity issues of Weldon. I had forgot about it until he h ad a brief blurb in one of his post a couple weeks back. So I got more det ails from him and found a distributor that I could get the 50ML two part ca rtridge. The stuff is comparable in price to the Weldon at about $13 a kit and each 50ML kit will do a window easily. There is an additional cost in that you need a gun which is about $30 but it will work with any two part, 1:1, gun packaged product. Each pak also comes with a self mixing dispens ing nozzle so you just stick it in the gun, put the nozzle on, and squeeze. Extra tips are less than a buck and if you don't use the whole cartridge you just chuck the tip and put the cap back on. I'm sure many of you are saying that you've heard this before but this st uff is GREAT! It looks and acts similar to the Weldon but you get upwards of 30min working time and it doesn't even sag! This stuff is made specific ally as a structural adhesive for plastics so it seems to be an excellent p roduct for this application. Not wanting to completely trust what I read I decided to a little non-sci entific destructive testing. I didn't have a piece of scrap fiberglass any more but I did have plenty of scrap plexi from trimming the windows so I to ok two pieces and glued an overlap of about 1.5x1.5 inch on two pieces of s crap. Cure time for this stuff is about 24 hours but I let it sit for abou t a week. This stuff doesn't get as rock hard as Weldon but it isn't flexi ble either. I took the glued piece and put it in the vise on its edge and tried to separate it in full edge shear (not really sure how to describe it but was the most difficult way to break it) and the plexi broke clear of t he glue joint. I then turned it flat and tried to peel it apart and again the plexi broke away from the glue joint. So far the glue joint hasn't bud ged. I then took a hammer and beat the crap out of the remaining square wh ich was basically just the glued area. After several whacks with the frami ng hammer I was finally able to get it to break into 3 pieces without ANY s eparation of the glue joint. I've attached a few pictures below so you can see what I'm talking about. The initial swag I took at how many cartridges I would need was a little high so I have four extras that I can sell to anyone that is interested. I was thinking $16 each would cover the cost and shipping and I can send you my gun to use as long as you send it back in a reasonable amount of time. Here is a link to the distributor I got it from. This page also has a li nk to the gun you need and extra tips if you want them. Keep in mind each pack comes with one tip too. http://chemical-concepts.com/products.php?sid=192&limit Here is a technical datasheet on 7545A: http://www.glue4you.com/PDF/Lord7545_TN001.pdf If you want two or four of the unopened packs I have just drop me a email d irectly. Michael


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:39:47 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Control column mounts
    From: "Bob Turner" <bobturner@alum.rpi.edu>
    In his case, the QB guys have already installed it, without removing material. I see no interference issues, just a little extra weight. But I'm not flying yet! -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=266088#266088


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:18:42 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Control column mounts
    From: "Perry, Phil" <Phil.Perry@netapp.com>
    Thought I'd share this piece of knowledge with the QB group too. Check the torque values of all your QB installed AN3 hardware. I started sneaking up on mine the other night to see what value they were tourqed to. Any guesses???? 85 inches. Phil -----Original Message----- From: Bob Turner [mailto:bobturner@alum.rpi.edu] Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 12:39 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Control column mounts In his case, the QB guys have already installed it, without removing material. I see no interference issues, just a little extra weight. But I'm not flying yet! -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=266088#266088


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:53:01 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Control column mounts
    From: Rob Kochman <rv10rob@gmail.com>
    If they start turning at 85 in-lbs, that doesn't mean they were torqued to 85, correct? Isn't extra torque required to "break free"? On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Perry, Phil <Phil.Perry@netapp.com> wrote: > > Thought I'd share this piece of knowledge with the QB group too. > > Check the torque values of all your QB installed AN3 hardware. I > started sneaking up on mine the other night to see what value they were > tourqed to. > > Any guesses???? > > > 85 inches. > > > Phil > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Turner [mailto:bobturner@alum.rpi.edu] > Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 12:39 PM > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Re: Control column mounts > > > In his case, the QB guys have already installed it, without removing > material. > > I see no interference issues, just a little extra weight. But I'm not > flying yet! > > -------- > Bob Turner > RV-10 QB > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=266088#266088 > > -- Rob Kochman RV-10 Wings Woodinville, WA (near Seattle) http://kochman.net/N819K


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:21:37 PM PST US
    From: John Koonce <john@jpkoonce.net>
    Subject: Door-I'm the guy.
    A friend told me that I made your discussions. I lost the door on takeoff last week. A fly-in was finishing up when a pilot friend asked me for a ride in my RV 10. I had had it parked on the ramp most of the day for static display. I'm a Urologist and was on call, but staying in the local area would still not put me more than 30 min from the hospital if I got called for an emergency. We taxied out for a quick spin. I'm very aware of the door problem and have a double check for the door. I personally close both doors on both sides and check security front and aft both visually and with hand pressure. When we got in I checked his side as I usually do and closed my own door. I keep the passenger seat forward and it makes it difficult to hand pressure check the aft pin because of the closeness of the seat to the door. Visually it looked fine. During taxi I of course got paged and this distracted me from the flying. I handled the page and we continued taxi. The passenger is a pilot who built, flew and ultimately sold an RV 6. I'm suspicious this made me a bit cavalier about pre flight steps. We had already done our run up sequence and started our takeoff roll fairly quickly. We had lifted off and were climbing at about 80-90 knots when the door shifted out. It happened very quickly, went on out, twisted on the hinges and departed. It did not strike the airframe. We continued the climb, did a go round, and landed uneventfully. Except for the noise the aircraft handled without problems. We retrieved the door and there is surprisingly little damage. The plexiglass has two cracks about 3-4 inches. Interestingly enough the complete hinge assembly remained attached to the airframe. The attach point to the door is doubled firbeglass and the fibreglass layer attached to the hinge stayed with the hinge. The bolts pulled thru the outer door fibreglass skin. The paint remained intact and there is almost no visible damage to the outer skin of the door. The other aircraft with the hard landing had similar findings after I reviewed his pictures. The door departed because the aft pin wasn't engaged. No aircraft component failed. I have the lights installed for the doors, but could have missed this with the distractions. I had to readjust them in the past because the pin is close enough to the magnetic reed that it sensed the door closed even with the pin outside the engagement block. I think the best way to manage this is to hand pressure check the engagement of the pin as well as visually check it. My visual check wasn't enough. The handle on the door is almost directly over the front pin, so pulling shut the door seats that easily. When the door swings in, it is very easy for the aft door to twist and not slip properly into the aircraft door frame. Rotating the door handle gives a secure tight feel even when the aft pin is not engaged, but just simply sliding outside the doorframe on the aircraft skin. The front pin pulls it tight. Once rolling, I assume the positive pressure from the vents internally on the door, combined with the negative pressure on the door surface eventually overwhelms the front pin and at that point it goes very quickly. Both of us in the aircraft were experienced pilots, and as well the aircraft really never got above 90-100 knots, or above 1000 ft AGL. Should the pin hold enough to get to altitude or 160 knots, I'm not sure what would happen, as the wind effect is impressive. Again, the aircraft handled fine. Hopefully this note will help others to avoid this event. As far as suggested solutions to manage this problem, I am not convinced that the safety wire technique would work effectively, but I certainly would encourage it. For a urologist, scrotal reconstructions pay very well. Please be sure your health insurance is current.


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:53:45 PM PST US
    From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007@cox.net>
    Subject: Door-I'm the guy.
    Congratulations on landing safely; perhaps a way could be found on the interior faade to allow "feeling" the pins. Fortunately I chose not to have the faade so I feel the pins, each side, fore and aft, twice; pins are check after loading and before takeoff and I do it. I have missed the passenger door rear pin once (after loading) but caught it immediately by feeling the pins fore and aft. I have not installed the light system. I don't intend to install the safety wire since at 65 I still use mine. I have two back seat options ages 10 and 13. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Koonce Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 4:20 PM Subject: RV10-List: Door-I'm the guy. A friend told me that I made your discussions. I lost the door on takeoff last week. A fly-in was finishing up when a pilot friend asked me for a ride in my RV 10. I had had it parked on the ramp most of the day for static display. I'm a Urologist and was on call, but staying in the local area would still not put me more than 30 min from the hospital if I got called for an emergency. We taxied out for a quick spin. I'm very aware of the door problem and have a double check for the door. I personally close both doors on both sides and check security front and aft both visually and with hand pressure. When we got in I checked his side as I usually do and closed my own door. I keep the passenger seat forward and it makes it difficult to hand pressure check the aft pin because of the closeness of the seat to the door. Visually it looked fine. During taxi I of course got paged and this distracted me from the flying. I handled the page and we continued taxi. The passenger is a pilot who built, flew and ultimately sold an RV 6. I'm suspicious this made me a bit cavalier about pre flight steps. We had already done our run up sequence and started our takeoff roll fairly quickly. We had lifted off and were climbing at about 80-90 knots when the door shifted out. It happened very quickly, went on out, twisted on the hinges and departed. It did not strike the airframe. We continued the climb, did a go round, and landed uneventfully. Except for the noise the aircraft handled without problems. We retrieved the door and there is surprisingly little damage. The plexiglass has two cracks about 3-4 inches. Interestingly enough the complete hinge assembly remained attached to the airframe. The attach point to the door is doubled firbeglass and the fibreglass layer attached to the hinge stayed with the hinge. The bolts pulled thru the outer door fibreglass skin. The paint remained intact and there is almost no visible damage to the outer skin of the door. The other aircraft with the hard landing had similar findings after I reviewed his pictures. The door departed because the aft pin wasn't engaged. No aircraft component failed. I have the lights installed for the doors, but could have missed this with the distractions. I had to readjust them in the past because the pin is close enough to the magnetic reed that it sensed the door closed even with the pin outside the engagement block. I think the best way to manage this is to hand pressure check the engagement of the pin as well as visually check it. My visual check wasn't enough. The handle on the door is almost directly over the front pin, so pulling shut the door seats that easily. When the door swings in, it is very easy for the aft door to twist and not slip properly into the aircraft door frame. Rotating the door handle gives a secure tight feel even when the aft pin is not engaged, but just simply sliding outside the doorframe on the aircraft skin. The front pin pulls it tight. Once rolling, I assume the positive pressure from the vents internally on the door, combined with the negative pressure on the door surface eventually overwhelms the front pin and at that point it goes very quickly. Both of us in the aircraft were experienced pilots, and as well the aircraft really never got above 90-100 knots, or above 1000 ft AGL. Should the pin hold enough to get to altitude or 160 knots, I'm not sure what would happen, as the wind effect is impressive. Again, the aircraft handled fine. Hopefully this note will help others to avoid this event. As far as suggested solutions to manage this problem, I am not convinced that the safety wire technique would work effectively, but I certainly would encourage it. For a urologist, scrotal reconstructions pay very well. Please be sure your health insurance is current.


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:22:18 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Door-I'm the guy.
    From: ricksked@embarqmail.com
    Thanks for the info John and for being so candid on the cause. Just another reason to not be distracted on pre take off checks I agree the reeds are questionable if installed wrong or flimsy . I made brackets for mine which hold them in alignment very well. Glad you and your passenger came out unscathed.....BTW....I love my Urologist...and so should every man on this forum... Rick Sked N246RS Flying fun Do not archive Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T -----Original Message----- From: John Koonce <john@jpkoonce.net> Subject: RV10-List: Door-I'm the guy. A friend told me that I made your discussions. I lost the door on takeoff last week. A fly-in was finishing up when a pilot friend asked me for a ride in my RV 10. I had had it parked on the ramp most of the day for static display. I'm a Urologist and was on call, but staying in the local area would still not put me more than 30 min from the hospital if I got called for an emergency. We taxied out for a quick spin. I'm very aware of the door problem and have a double check for the door. I personally close both doors on both sides and check security front and aft both visually and with hand pressure. When we got in I checked his side as I usually do and closed my own door. I keep the passenger seat forward and it makes it difficult to hand pressure check the aft pin because of the closeness of the seat to the door. Visually it looked fine. During taxi I of course got paged and this distracted me from the flying. I handled the page and we continued taxi. The passenger is a pilot who built, flew and ultimately sold an RV 6. I'm suspicious this made me a bit cavalier about pre flight steps. We had already done our run up sequence and started our takeoff roll fairly quickly. We had lifted off and were climbing at about 80-90 knots when the door shifted out. It happened very quickly, went on out, twisted on the hinges and departed. It did not strike the airframe. We continued the climb, did a go round, and landed uneventfully. Except for the noise the aircraft handled without problems. We retrieved the door and there is surprisingly little damage. The plexiglass has two cracks about 3-4 inches. Interestingly enough the complete hinge assembly remained attached to the airframe. The attach point to the door is doubled firbeglass and the fibreglass layer attached to the hinge stayed with the hinge. The bolts pulled thru the outer door fibreglass skin. The paint remained intact and there is almost no visible damage to the outer skin of the door. The other aircraft with the hard landing had similar findings after I reviewed his pictures. The door departed because the aft pin wasn't engaged. No aircraft component failed. I have the lights installed for the doors, but could have missed this with the distractions. I had to readjust them in the past because the pin is close enough to the magnetic reed that it sensed the door closed even with the pin outside the engagement block. I think the best way to manage this is to hand pressure check the engagement of the pin as well as visually check it. My visual check wasn't enough. The handle on the door is almost directly over the front pin, so pulling shut the door seats that easily. When the door swings in, it is very easy for the aft door to twist and not slip properly into the aircraft door frame. Rotating the door handle gives a secure tight feel even when the aft pin is not engaged, but just simply sliding outside the doorframe on the aircraft skin. The front pin pulls it tight. Once rolling, I assume the positive pressure from the vents internally on the door, combined with the negative pressure on the door surface eventually overwhelms the front pin and at that point it goes very quickly. Both of us in the aircraft were experienced pilots, and as well the aircraft really never got above 90-100 knots, or above 1000 ft AGL. Should the pin hold enough to get to altitude or 160 knots, I'm not sure what would happen, as the wind effect is impressive. Again, the aircraft handled fine. Hopefully this note will help others to avoid this event. As far as suggested solutions to manage this problem, I am not convinced that the safety wire technique would work effectively, but I certainly would encourage it. For a urologist, scrotal reconstructions pay very well. Please be sure your health insurance is current.


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:29:02 PM PST US
    Subject: AFS - Alternator Warning
    From: "Jim" <jim@CombsFive.Com>
    I am flying with an AFS 3500EE EFIS / Engine Monitor. Yesterday the airplane was being flown and the fuse blew on the alternator field circuit causing the alternator go off line. Turns out the alternator AMPS warning is OFF by default and no warning was heard. It wasn't until the battery was low that an audible / visual alert was presented on the EFIS. Not sure just how long it took for the battery to get to the low voltage warning condition. I have copied the flight data from the EFIS and will review the data to see just how long it took. The EFIS went to backup battery during the flight and the flight was terminated with no other problems. This is just a heads up to those flying with the AFS EFIS to check the alternator AMPS setting in the configuration pages should you want an immediate warning for alternator current. Knowing you have a problem sooner than later is desirable. I did not have the alternator lamp wired (Didn't think I needed it with the EFIS audible alerts). I will be adding this to the panel in the near future. I love the EFIS, I just missed getting this setting correct. Jim Combs (N312F - 110+ hours)


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:11:37 PM PST US
    From: John Gonzalez <indigoonlatigo@msn.com>
    Subject: Door-I'm the guy.
    IMOP make the pins longer and build up the interior of the cabin top so tha t when the door is closed with the pins engaged=2C the cabin top is touchin g the inside of the door. That way there is no guess work involved as there would be if one is guestimating the gap between cabin top flange and insid e surface of the door=2C especially alone the entire bottom edge of the cab in top/door interface. My pins go 1/4inch beyond the two aluminum fuselage frames=2C for and aft f rames. John #409=2C the lager=2C just finished an RC foam sloper so I could have t hat feeling of entirely completing something. > From: dlm46007@cox.net > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Subject: RE: RV10-List: Door-I'm the guy. > Date: Fri=2C 2 Oct 2009 16:49:53 -0700 > > > Congratulations on landing safely=3B perhaps a way could be found on the > interior fa=E7ade to allow "feeling" the pins. Fortunately I chose not to have > the fa=E7ade so I feel the pins=2C each side=2C fore and aft=2C twice=3B pins are > check after loading and before takeoff and I do it. I have missed the > passenger door rear pin once (after loading) but caught it immediately by > feeling the pins fore and aft. I have not installed the light system. I > don't intend to install the safety wire since at 65 I still use mine. I h ave > two back seat options ages 10 and 13. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Koonce > Sent: Friday=2C October 02=2C 2009 4:20 PM > To: RV10-List@matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Door-I'm the guy. > > > A friend told me that I made your discussions. I lost the door on takeof f > last week. > > A fly-in was finishing up when a pilot friend asked me for a ride in my R V > 10. I had had it parked on the ramp most of the day for static display. > I'm a Urologist and was on call=2C but staying in the local area would st ill > not put me more than 30 min from the hospital if I got called for an > emergency. We taxied out for a quick spin. I'm very aware of the door > problem and have a double check for the door. I personally close both do ors > on both sides and check security front and aft both visually and with han d > pressure. When we got in I checked his side as I usually do and closed m y > own door. I keep the passenger seat forward and it makes it difficult to > hand pressure check the aft pin because of the closeness of the seat to t he > door. Visually it looked fine. During taxi I of course got paged and th is > distracted me from the flying. I handled the page and we continued taxi. > The passenger is a pilot who built=2C flew and ultimately sold an RV 6. > I'm suspicious this made me a bit cavalier about pre flight steps. We ha d > already done our run up sequence and started our takeoff roll fairly > quickly. We had lifted off and were climbing at about 80-90 knots when t he > door shifted out. It happened very quickly=2C went on out=2C twisted on the > hinges and departed. It did not strike the airframe. We continued the > climb=2C did a go round=2C and landed uneventfully. Except for the noise the > aircraft handled without problems. We retrieved the door and there is > surprisingly little > damage. The plexiglass has two cracks about 3-4 inches. > Interestingly enough the complete hinge assembly remained attached to the > airframe. The attach point to the door is doubled firbeglass and the > fibreglass layer attached to the hinge stayed with the hinge. The bolts > pulled thru the outer door fibreglass skin. The paint remained intact an d > there is almost no visible damage to the outer skin of the door. The oth er > aircraft with the hard landing had similar findings after I reviewed his > pictures. > > The door departed because the aft pin wasn't engaged. No aircraft compon ent > failed. I have the lights installed for the doors=2C but > could have missed this with the distractions. I had to readjust them > in the past because the pin is close enough to the magnetic reed that > it sensed the door closed even with the pin outside the engagement block. I > think the best way to manage this is to hand pressure check the engagemen t > of the pin as well as visually check it. My visual check wasn't enough. > The handle on the door is almost directly over > the front pin=2C so pulling shut the door seats that easily. When the > door swings in=2C it is very easy for the aft door to twist and not slip > properly into the aircraft door frame. Rotating the door handle gives a > secure tight feel even when the aft pin is not engaged=2C but just simply > sliding outside the doorframe on the aircraft skin. The front pin pulls it > tight. Once rolling=2C I assume the positive pressure from the vents > internally on the door=2C combined with the negative pressure on the door > surface eventually overwhelms the front pin and at that point it goes ver y > quickly. > > Both of us in the aircraft were experienced pilots=2C and as well the > aircraft really never got above 90-100 knots=2C or above 1000 ft AGL. > Should the pin hold enough to get to altitude or 160 knots=2C I'm not sur e > what would happen=2C as the wind effect is impressive. Again=2C the airc raft > handled fine. Hopefully this note will help others to avoid this event. > > As far as suggested solutions to manage this problem=2C I am not convince d > that the safety wire technique would work effectively=2C but I certainly would > encourage it. For a urologist=2C scrotal reconstructions pay very well. > Please be sure your health insurance is current. > > > > > > > > =========== =========== =========== =========== > > >


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:18:22 PM PST US
    From: John Gonzalez <indigoonlatigo@msn.com>
    Subject: Window Glue
    You might want to find that piece of fiberglass and do the same test with t he plexi to fiberglass and then also make sure you test it where the gab be tween the to is almost 1/8 of an inch. Make sure it still is as strong. No doubt it is great stuff=2C but just be sure. > From: rvbuilder@sausen.net > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Date: Fri=2C 2 Oct 2009 10:30:16 -0500 > Subject: RV10-List: Window Glue > > I thought I would share my experience with an alternative glue for adhe ring the windows. Based on a recommendation from Geoff Combs=2C I picked u p some Lord 7545A/E urethane adhesive rather than using the Weldon 10 we ar e all familiar with. > > I did follow the standard process with the rear windows and after that experience=2C along with forgetting my shims in the rush=2C I thought I wou ld look into the alternatives. After not really finding anything definitiv e from the existing alternatives like Sikaflex I basically resigned myself to use Weldon for the doors. As I got within a couple weeks of doing the d oor windows Geoff had mentioned to me that he used something else for the w indow adhesive that was very much suited for the task and didn't have the q uick cure times and viscosity issues of Weldon. I had forgot about it unti l he had a brief blurb in one of his post a couple weeks back. So I got mo re details from him and found a distributor that I could get the 50ML two p art cartridge. The stuff is comparable in price to the Weldon at about $13 a kit and each 50ML kit will do a window easily. There is an additional c ost in that you need a gun which is about $30 but it will work with any two part=2C 1:1=2C gun packaged product. Each pak also comes with a self mixi ng dispensing nozzle so you just stick it in the gun=2C put the nozzle on =2C and squeeze. Extra tips are less than a buck and if you don't use the whole cartridge you just chuck the tip and put the cap back on. > > I'm sure many of you are saying that you've heard this before but this stuff is GREAT! It looks and acts similar to the Weldon but you get upward s of 30min working time and it doesn't even sag! This stuff is made specif ically as a structural adhesive for plastics so it seems to be an excellent product for this application. > > Not wanting to completely trust what I read I decided to a little non-s cientific destructive testing. I didn't have a piece of scrap fiberglass a nymore but I did have plenty of scrap plexi from trimming the windows so I took two pieces and glued an overlap of about 1.5x1.5 inch on two pieces of scrap. Cure time for this stuff is about 24 hours but I let it sit for ab out a week. This stuff doesn't get as rock hard as Weldon but it isn't fle xible either. I took the glued piece and put it in the vise on its edge an d tried to separate it in full edge shear (not really sure how to describe it but was the most difficult way to break it) and the plexi broke clear of the glue joint. I then turned it flat and tried to peel it apart and agai n the plexi broke away from the glue joint. So far the glue joint hasn't b udged. I then took a hammer and beat the crap out of the remaining square which was basically just the glued area. After several whacks with the fra ming hammer I was finally able to get it to break into 3 pieces without ANY separation of the glue joint. I've attached a few pictures below so you c an see what I'm talking about. > > The initial swag I took at how many cartridges I would need was a littl e high so I have four extras that I can sell to anyone that is interested. I was thinking $16 each would cover the cost and shipping and I can send y ou my gun to use as long as you send it back in a reasonable amount of time . > > Here is a link to the distributor I got it from. This page also has a link to the gun you need and extra tips if you want them. Keep in mind eac h pack comes with one tip too. > > http://chemical-concepts.com/products.php?sid=192&limit > > Here is a technical datasheet on 7545A: > > http://www.glue4you.com/PDF/Lord7545_TN001.pdf > > If you want two or four of the unopened packs I have just drop me a email directly. > Michael > >


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:43:54 PM PST US
    From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007@cox.net>
    Subject: Door-I'm the guy.
    concur on pin length; I advised Vans earlier that their supplied pins already cut to length were barely sufficient if they were placed exactly where the Van's engineers wanted them. Actual placement can vary by 1/4" depending on where the builder located the pins in the latch mechanism recess in the door. Full circumference should be seen inside , at a minimum, the fuselage door post when the pin is in the locked position _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Gonzalez Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 6:09 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Door-I'm the guy. IMOP make the pins longer and build up the interior of the cabin top so that when the door is closed with the pins engaged, the cabin top is touching the inside of the door. That way there is no guess work involved as there would be if one is guestimating the gap between cabin top flange and inside surface of the door, especially alone the entire bottom edge of the cabin top/door interface. My pins go 1/4inch beyond the two aluminum fuselage frames, for and aft frames. John #409, the lager, just finished an RC foam sloper so I could have that feeling of entirely completing something. > From: dlm46007@cox.net > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Subject: RE: RV10-List: Door-I'm the guy. > Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 16:49:53 -0700 > > > Congratulations on landing safely; perhaps a way could be found on the > interior fa=E7ade to allow "feeling" the pins. Fortunately I chose not to have > the fa=E7ade so I feel the pins, each side, fore and aft, twice; pins are > check after loading and before takeoff and I do it. I have missed the > passenger door rear pin once (after loading) but caught it immediately by > feeling the pins fore and aft. I have not installed the light system. I > don't intend to install the safety wire since at 65 I still use mine. I have > two back seat options ages 10 and 13. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Koonce > Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 4:20 PM > To: RV10-List@matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Door-I'm the guy. > > > A friend told me that I made your discussions. I lost the door on takeoff > last week. > > A fly-in was finishing up when a pilot friend asked me for a ride in my RV > 10. I had had it parked on the ramp most of the day for static display. > I'm a Urologist and was on call, but staying in the local area would still > not put me more than 30 min from the hospital if I got called for an > emergency. We taxied out for a quick spin. I'm very aware of the door > problem and have a double check for the door. I personally close both doors > on both sides and check security front and aft both visually and with hand > pressure. When we got in I checked his side as I usually do and closed my > own door. I keep the passenger seat forward and it makes it difficult to > hand pressure check the aft pin because of the closeness of the seat to the > door. Visually it looked fine. During taxi I of course got paged and this > distracted me from the flying. I handled the page and we continued taxi. > The passenger is a pilot who built, flew and ultimately sold an RV 6. > I'm suspicious this made me a bit cavalier about pre flight steps. We had > already done our run up sequence and started our takeoff roll fairly > quickly. We had lifted off and were climbing at about 80-90 knots when the > door shifted out. It happened very quickly, went on out, twisted on the > hinges and departed. It did not strike the airframe. We continued the > climb, did a go round, and landed uneventfully. Except for the noise the > aircraft handled without problems. We retrieved the door and there is > surprisingly little > damage. The plexiglass has two cracks about 3-4 inches. > Interestingly enough the complete hinge assembly remained attached to the > airframe. The attach point to the door is doubled firbeglass and the > fibreglass layer attached to the hinge stayed with the hinge. The bolts > pulled thru the outer door fibreglass skin. The paint remained intact and > there is almost no visible damage to the outer skin of the door. The other > aircraft with the hard landing had similar findings after I reviewed his > pictures. > > The door departed because the aft pin wasn't engaged. No aircraft component > failed. I have the lights installed for the doors, but > could have missed this with the distractions. I had to readjust them > in the past because the pin is close enough to the magnetic reed that > it sensed the door closed even with the pin outside the engagement block. I > think the best way to manage this is to hand pressure check the engagement > of the pin as well as visually check it. My visual check wasn't enough. > The handle on the door is almost directly over > the front pin, so pulling shut the door seats that easily. When the > door swings in, it is very easy for the aft door to twist and not slip > properly into the aircraft door frame. Rotating the door handle gives a > secure tight feel even when the aft pin is not engaged, but just simply > sliding outside the doorframe on the aircraft skin. The front pin pulls it > tight. Once rolling, I assume the positive pressure from the vents > internally on the door, combined with the negative pressure on the door > surface eventually overwhelms the front pin and at that point it goes very > quickly. > > Both of us in the aircraft were experienced pilots, and as well the > aircraft really never got above 90-100 knots, or above 1000 ft AGL. > Should the pin hold enough to get to altitude or 160 knots, I'm not sure > what would happen, as the wind effect is impressive. Again, the aircraft > handled fine. Hopefully this note will help others to avoid this event. > > As far as suggested solutions to manage this problem, I am not convinced > that the safety wire technique would work effectively, but I certainly would > encourage it. For a urologist, scrotal reconstructions pay very well. > Please be sure your health insurance i======================== > ========== > > >


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:45:35 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Door-I'm the guy.
    From: ricksked@embarqmail.com
    VGhhdCdzIHJlYWxseSBob3cgYSBwcm9wZXJseSBmaXQgZG9vciBzaG91bGQgYmUuLi5JTUhPLi4u RldJVy4uLnlvdSBjYW4ndCBsYXRjaCBteSBkb29ycyB3aXRoIGEgcGluIG91dCBvZiB0aGUgc29j a2V0IA0KDQpSaWNrIFNrZWQNCk4yNDZSUw0KU2VudCB2aWEgQmxhY2tCZXJyeSBieSBBVCZUDQoN Ci0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tDQpGcm9tOiBKb2huIEdvbnphbGV6IDxpbmRpZ29v bmxhdGlnb0Btc24uY29tPg0KDQpEYXRlOiBGcmksIDIgT2N0IDIwMDkgMTg6MDk6MTggDQpUbzog UlYgMTAgZ3JvdXA8cnYxMC1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20+DQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSRTogUlYxMC1M aXN0OiBEb29yLUknbSB0aGUgZ3V5Lg0KDQoNCg0KSU1PUCBtYWtlIHRoZSBwaW5zIGxvbmdlciBh bmQgYnVpbGQgdXAgdGhlIGludGVyaW9yIG9mIHRoZSBjYWJpbiB0b3Agc28gdGhhdCB3aGVuIHRo ZSBkb29yIGlzIGNsb3NlZCB3aXRoIHRoZSBwaW5zIGVuZ2FnZWQsIHRoZSBjYWJpbiB0b3AgaXMg dG91Y2hpbmcgdGhlIGluc2lkZSBvZiB0aGUgZG9vci4gVGhhdCB3YXkgdGhlcmUgaXMgbm8gZ3Vl c3Mgd29yayBpbnZvbHZlZCBhcyB0aGVyZSB3b3VsZCBiZSBpZiBvbmUgaXMgZ3Vlc3RpbWF0aW5n IHRoZSBnYXAgYmV0d2VlbiBjYWJpbiB0b3AgZmxhbmdlIGFuZCBpbnNpZGUgc3VyZmFjZSBvZiB0 aGUgZG9vciwgZXNwZWNpYWxseSBhbG9uZSB0aGUgZW50aXJlIGJvdHRvbSBlZGdlIG9mIHRoZSBj YWJpbiB0b3AvZG9vciBpbnRlcmZhY2UuDQpNeSBwaW5zIGdvIDEvNGluY2ggYmV5b25kIHRoZSB0 d28gYWx1bWludW0gZnVzZWxhZ2UgZnJhbWVzLCBmb3IgYW5kIGFmdCBmcmFtZXMuDQpKb2huICM0 MDksIHRoZSBsYWdlciwganVzdCBmaW5pc2hlZCBhbiBSQyBmb2FtIHNsb3BlciBzbyBJIGNvdWxk IGhhdmUgdGhhdCBmZWVsaW5nIG9mIGVudGlyZWx5IGNvbXBsZXRpbmcgc29tZXRoaW5nLg0KDQo+ IEZyb206IGRsbTQ2MDA3QGNveC5uZXQNCj4gVG86IHJ2MTAtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tDQo+ IFN1YmplY3Q6IFJFOiBSVjEwLUxpc3Q6IERvb3ItSSdtIHRoZSBndXkuDQo+IERhdGU6IEZyaSwg MiBPY3QgMjAwOSAxNjo0OTo1MyAtMDcwMA0KPiANCj4gLS0+IFJWMTAtTGlzdCBtZXNzYWdlIHBv c3RlZCBieTogIkRhdmlkIE1jTmVpbGwiIDxkbG00NjAwN0Bjb3gubmV0Pg0KPiANCj4gQ29uZ3Jh dHVsYXRpb25zIG9uIGxhbmRpbmcgc2FmZWx5OyBwZXJoYXBzIGEgd2F5IGNvdWxkIGJlIGZvdW5k IG9uIHRoZQ0KPiBpbnRlcmlvciBmYedhZGUgdG8gYWxsb3cgImZlZWxpbmciIHRoZSBwaW5zLiBG b3J0dW5hdGVseSBJIGNob3NlIG5vdCB0byBoYXZlDQo+IHRoZSBmYedhZGUgc28gSSBmZWVsIHRo ZSBwaW5zLCBlYWNoIHNpZGUsIGZvcmUgYW5kIGFmdCwgdHdpY2U7IHBpbnMgYXJlDQo+IGNoZWNr IGFmdGVyIGxvYWRpbmcgYW5kIGJlZm9yZSB0YWtlb2ZmIGFuZCBJIGRvIGl0LiBJIGhhdmUgbWlz c2VkIHRoZQ0KPiBwYXNzZW5nZXIgZG9vciByZWFyIHBpbiBvbmNlIChhZnRlciBsb2FkaW5nKSBi dXQgY2F1Z2h0IGl0IGltbWVkaWF0ZWx5IGJ5DQo+IGZlZWxpbmcgdGhlIHBpbnMgZm9yZSBhbmQg YWZ0LiAgSSBoYXZlIG5vdCBpbnN0YWxsZWQgdGhlIGxpZ2h0IHN5c3RlbS4gSQ0KPiBkb24ndCBp bnRlbmQgdG8gaW5zdGFsbCB0aGUgc2FmZXR5IHdpcmUgc2luY2UgYXQgNjUgSSBzdGlsbCB1c2Ug bWluZS4gSSBoYXZlDQo+IHR3byBiYWNrIHNlYXQgb3B0aW9ucyBhZ2VzIDEwIGFuZCAxMy4NCj4g DQo+IC0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tDQo+IEZyb206IG93bmVyLXJ2MTAtbGlzdC1z ZXJ2ZXJAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbQ0KPiBbbWFpbHRvOm93bmVyLXJ2MTAtbGlzdC1zZXJ2ZXJAbWF0 cm9uaWNzLmNvbV0gT24gQmVoYWxmIE9mIEpvaG4gS29vbmNlDQo+IFNlbnQ6IEZyaWRheSwgT2N0 b2JlciAwMiwgMjAwOSA0OjIwIFBNDQo+IFRvOiBSVjEwLUxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbQ0KPiBT dWJqZWN0OiBSVjEwLUxpc3Q6IERvb3ItSSdtIHRoZSBndXkuDQo+IA0KPiAtLT4gUlYxMC1MaXN0 IG1lc3NhZ2UgcG9zdGVkIGJ5OiBKb2huIEtvb25jZSA8am9obkBqcGtvb25jZS5uZXQ+DQo+IA0K PiBBIGZyaWVuZCB0b2xkIG1lIHRoYXQgSSBtYWRlIHlvdXIgZGlzY3Vzc2lvbnMuICBJIGxvc3Qg dGhlIGRvb3Igb24gdGFrZW9mZg0KPiBsYXN0IHdlZWsuDQo+IA0KPiBBIGZseS1pbiB3YXMgZmlu aXNoaW5nIHVwIHdoZW4gYSBwaWxvdCBmcmllbmQgYXNrZWQgbWUgZm9yIGEgcmlkZSBpbiBteSBS Vg0KPiAxMC4gIEkgaGFkIGhhZCBpdCBwYXJrZWQgb24gdGhlIHJhbXAgbW9zdCBvZiB0aGUgZGF5 IGZvciBzdGF0aWMgZGlzcGxheS4NCj4gSSdtIGEgVXJvbG9naXN0IGFuZCB3YXMgb24gY2FsbCwg YnV0IHN0YXlpbmcgaW4gdGhlIGxvY2FsIGFyZWEgd291bGQgc3RpbGwNCj4gbm90IHB1dCBtZSBt b3JlIHRoYW4gMzAgbWluIGZyb20gdGhlIGhvc3BpdGFsIGlmIEkgZ290IGNhbGxlZCBmb3IgYW4N Cj4gZW1lcmdlbmN5LiAgV2UgdGF4aWVkIG91dCBmb3IgYSBxdWljayBzcGluLiAgSSdtIHZlcnkg YXdhcmUgb2YgdGhlIGRvb3INCj4gcHJvYmxlbSBhbmQgaGF2ZSBhIGRvdWJsZSBjaGVjayBmb3Ig dGhlIGRvb3IuICBJIHBlcnNvbmFsbHkgY2xvc2UgYm90aCBkb29ycw0KPiBvbiBib3RoIHNpZGVz IGFuZCBjaGVjayBzZWN1cml0eSBmcm9udCBhbmQgYWZ0IGJvdGggdmlzdWFsbHkgYW5kIHdpdGgg aGFuZA0KPiBwcmVzc3VyZS4gIFdoZW4gd2UgZ290IGluIEkgY2hlY2tlZCBoaXMgc2lkZSBhcyBJ IHVzdWFsbHkgZG8gYW5kIGNsb3NlZCBteQ0KPiBvd24gZG9vci4gIEkga2VlcCB0aGUgcGFzc2Vu Z2VyIHNlYXQgZm9yd2FyZCBhbmQgaXQgbWFrZXMgaXQgZGlmZmljdWx0IHRvDQo+IGhhbmQgcHJl c3N1cmUgY2hlY2sgdGhlIGFmdCBwaW4gYmVjYXVzZSBvZiB0aGUgY2xvc2VuZXNzIG9mIHRoZSBz ZWF0IHRvIHRoZQ0KPiBkb29yLiAgVmlzdWFsbHkgaXQgbG9va2VkIGZpbmUuICBEdXJpbmcgdGF4 aSBJIG9mIGNvdXJzZSBnb3QgcGFnZWQgYW5kIHRoaXMNCj4gZGlzdHJhY3RlZCBtZSBmcm9tIHRo ZSBmbHlpbmcuICBJIGhhbmRsZWQgdGhlIHBhZ2UgYW5kIHdlIGNvbnRpbnVlZCB0YXhpLg0KPiBU aGUgcGFzc2VuZ2VyIGlzIGEgcGlsb3Qgd2hvIGJ1aWx0LCBmbGV3IGFuZCB1bHRpbWF0ZWx5IHNv bGQgYW4gUlYgNi4gICANCj4gSSdtIHN1c3BpY2lvdXMgdGhpcyBtYWRlIG1lIGEgYml0IGNhdmFs aWVyIGFib3V0IHByZSBmbGlnaHQgc3RlcHMuICBXZSBoYWQNCj4gYWxyZWFkeSBkb25lIG91ciBy dW4gdXAgc2VxdWVuY2UgYW5kIHN0YXJ0ZWQgb3VyIHRha2VvZmYgcm9sbCBmYWlybHkNCj4gcXVp Y2tseS4gIFdlIGhhZCBsaWZ0ZWQgb2ZmIGFuZCB3ZXJlIGNsaW1iaW5nIGF0IGFib3V0IDgwLTkw IGtub3RzIHdoZW4gdGhlDQo+IGRvb3Igc2hpZnRlZCBvdXQuICBJdCBoYXBwZW5lZCB2ZXJ5IHF1 aWNrbHksIHdlbnQgb24gb3V0LCB0d2lzdGVkIG9uIHRoZQ0KPiBoaW5nZXMgYW5kIGRlcGFydGVk LiAgSXQgZGlkIG5vdCBzdHJpa2UgdGhlIGFpcmZyYW1lLiAgV2UgY29udGludWVkIHRoZQ0KPiBj bGltYiwgZGlkIGEgZ28gcm91bmQsIGFuZCBsYW5kZWQgdW5ldmVudGZ1bGx5LiAgRXhjZXB0IGZv ciB0aGUgbm9pc2UgdGhlDQo+IGFpcmNyYWZ0IGhhbmRsZWQgd2l0aG91dCBwcm9ibGVtcy4gIFdl IHJldHJpZXZlZCB0aGUgZG9vciBhbmQgdGhlcmUgaXMNCj4gc3VycHJpc2luZ2x5IGxpdHRsZSAg DQo+IGRhbWFnZS4gIFRoZSBwbGV4aWdsYXNzIGhhcyB0d28gY3JhY2tzIGFib3V0IDMtNCBpbmNo ZXMuICAgDQo+IEludGVyZXN0aW5nbHkgZW5vdWdoIHRoZSBjb21wbGV0ZSBoaW5nZSBhc3NlbWJs eSByZW1haW5lZCBhdHRhY2hlZCB0byB0aGUNCj4gYWlyZnJhbWUuICBUaGUgYXR0YWNoIHBvaW50 IHRvIHRoZSBkb29yIGlzIGRvdWJsZWQgZmlyYmVnbGFzcyBhbmQgdGhlDQo+IGZpYnJlZ2xhc3Mg bGF5ZXIgYXR0YWNoZWQgdG8gdGhlIGhpbmdlIHN0YXllZCB3aXRoIHRoZSBoaW5nZS4gIFRoZSBi b2x0cw0KPiBwdWxsZWQgdGhydSB0aGUgb3V0ZXIgZG9vciBmaWJyZWdsYXNzIHNraW4uICBUaGUg cGFpbnQgcmVtYWluZWQgaW50YWN0IGFuZA0KPiB0aGVyZSBpcyBhbG1vc3Qgbm8gdmlzaWJsZSBk YW1hZ2UgdG8gdGhlIG91dGVyIHNraW4gb2YgdGhlIGRvb3IuICBUaGUgb3RoZXINCj4gYWlyY3Jh ZnQgd2l0aCB0aGUgaGFyZCBsYW5kaW5nIGhhZCBzaW1pbGFyIGZpbmRpbmdzIGFmdGVyIEkgcmV2 aWV3ZWQgaGlzDQo+IHBpY3R1cmVzLg0KPiANCj4gVGhlIGRvb3IgZGVwYXJ0ZWQgYmVjYXVzZSB0 aGUgYWZ0IHBpbiB3YXNuJ3QgZW5nYWdlZC4gIE5vIGFpcmNyYWZ0IGNvbXBvbmVudA0KPiBmYWls ZWQuICBJIGhhdmUgdGhlIGxpZ2h0cyBpbnN0YWxsZWQgZm9yIHRoZSBkb29ycywgYnV0ICANCj4g Y291bGQgaGF2ZSBtaXNzZWQgdGhpcyB3aXRoIHRoZSBkaXN0cmFjdGlvbnMuICAgSSBoYWQgdG8g cmVhZGp1c3QgdGhlbSAgDQo+IGluIHRoZSBwYXN0IGJlY2F1c2UgdGhlIHBpbiBpcyBjbG9zZSBl bm91Z2ggdG8gdGhlIG1hZ25ldGljIHJlZWQgdGhhdCAgIA0KPiBpdCBzZW5zZWQgdGhlIGRvb3Ig Y2xvc2VkIGV2ZW4gd2l0aCB0aGUgcGluIG91dHNpZGUgdGhlIGVuZ2FnZW1lbnQgYmxvY2suICBJ DQo+IHRoaW5rIHRoZSBiZXN0IHdheSB0byBtYW5hZ2UgdGhpcyBpcyB0byBoYW5kIHByZXNzdXJl IGNoZWNrIHRoZSBlbmdhZ2VtZW50DQo+IG9mIHRoZSBwaW4gYXMgd2VsbCBhcyB2aXN1YWxseSBj aGVjayBpdC4gIE15IHZpc3VhbCBjaGVjayB3YXNuJ3QgZW5vdWdoLg0KPiBUaGUgaGFuZGxlIG9u IHRoZSBkb29yIGlzIGFsbW9zdCBkaXJlY3RseSBvdmVyICANCj4gdGhlIGZyb250IHBpbiwgc28g cHVsbGluZyBzaHV0IHRoZSBkb29yIHNlYXRzIHRoYXQgZWFzaWx5LiAgIFdoZW4gdGhlICANCj4g ZG9vciBzd2luZ3MgaW4sIGl0IGlzIHZlcnkgZWFzeSBmb3IgdGhlIGFmdCBkb29yIHRvIHR3aXN0 IGFuZCBub3Qgc2xpcA0KPiBwcm9wZXJseSBpbnRvIHRoZSBhaXJjcmFmdCBkb29yIGZyYW1lLiAg Um90YXRpbmcgdGhlIGRvb3IgaGFuZGxlIGdpdmVzIGENCj4gc2VjdXJlIHRpZ2h0IGZlZWwgZXZl biB3aGVuIHRoZSBhZnQgcGluIGlzIG5vdCBlbmdhZ2VkLCBidXQganVzdCBzaW1wbHkNCj4gc2xp ZGluZyBvdXRzaWRlIHRoZSBkb29yZnJhbWUgb24gdGhlIGFpcmNyYWZ0IHNraW4uICBUaGUgZnJv bnQgcGluIHB1bGxzIGl0DQo+IHRpZ2h0LiAgT25jZSByb2xsaW5nLCBJIGFzc3VtZSB0aGUgcG9z aXRpdmUgcHJlc3N1cmUgZnJvbSB0aGUgdmVudHMNCj4gaW50ZXJuYWxseSBvbiB0aGUgZG9vciwg Y29tYmluZWQgd2l0aCB0aGUgbmVnYXRpdmUgcHJlc3N1cmUgb24gdGhlIGRvb3INCj4gc3VyZmFj ZSBldmVudHVhbGx5IG92ZXJ3aGVsbXMgdGhlIGZyb250IHBpbiBhbmQgYXQgdGhhdCBwb2ludCBp dCBnb2VzIHZlcnkNCj4gcXVpY2tseS4NCj4gDQo+IEJvdGggb2YgdXMgaW4gdGhlIGFpcmNyYWZ0 IHdlcmUgZXhwZXJpZW5jZWQgcGlsb3RzLCBhbmQgYXMgd2VsbCB0aGUgIA0KPiBhaXJjcmFmdCBy ZWFsbHkgbmV2ZXIgZ290IGFib3ZlIDkwLTEwMCBrbm90cywgb3IgYWJvdmUgMTAwMCBmdCBBR0wu ICAgDQo+IFNob3VsZCB0aGUgcGluIGhvbGQgZW5vdWdoIHRvIGdldCB0byBhbHRpdHVkZSBvciAx NjAga25vdHMsIEknbSBub3Qgc3VyZQ0KPiB3aGF0IHdvdWxkIGhhcHBlbiwgYXMgdGhlIHdpbmQg ZWZmZWN0IGlzIGltcHJlc3NpdmUuICBBZ2FpbiwgdGhlIGFpcmNyYWZ0DQo+IGhhbmRsZWQgZmlu ZS4gIEhvcGVmdWxseSB0aGlzIG5vdGUgd2lsbCBoZWxwIG90aGVycyB0byBhdm9pZCB0aGlzIGV2 ZW50Lg0KPiANCj4gQXMgZmFyIGFzIHN1Z2dlc3RlZCBzb2x1dGlvbnMgdG8gbWFuYWdlIHRoaXMg cHJvYmxlbSwgSSBhbSBub3QgY29udmluY2VkDQo+IHRoYXQgdGhlIHNhZmV0eSB3aXJlIHRlY2hu aXF1ZSB3b3VsZCB3b3JrIGVmZmVjdGl2ZWx5LCBidXQgSSBjZXJ0YWlubHkgd291bGQNCj4gZW5j b3VyYWdlIGl0LiAgRm9yIGEgdXJvbG9naXN0LCBzY3JvdGFsIHJlY29uc3RydWN0aW9ucyBwYXkg dmVyeSB3ZWxsLg0KPiBQbGVhc2UgYmUgc3VyZSB5b3VyIGhlYWx0aCBpbnN1cmFuY2UgaXMgY3Vy cmVudC4NCj4gDQo+IA0KPiANCj4gDQo+IA0KPiANCj4gDQo+IA0KPT09PT09PT09PT09DQo9PT09 PT09PT09PT0NCj09PT09PT09PT09PQ0KPT09PT09PT09PT09DQo+IA0KPiANCj4gDQogCQkgCSAg IAkJICANCg=


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:15:01 PM PST US
    From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007@cox.net>
    Subject: charger 12248
    Just received it tonight. Will report later. One immediate observation; for each battery behind the closeout, a separate sensor wire is required and 12V cigarette plugs must be placed in the top where it is not necessary to remove the rear cover to maintain the batteries.


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:15:02 PM PST US
    From: Robert Brunkenhoefer <rebrunk42@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Door-I'm the guy.
    I put a plastic door pull near the aft part of the door by the aft pin to insure a firm and solid closure. Sent from my iPhone Robert E. Brunkenhoefer Brunkenhoefer Law Firm, P.C. 520 Lawrence St. Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 Phone: 361-888-8808 Facsimile: 361-888-6753 robert@brunklaw.com On Oct 2, 2009, at 7:10 PM, ricksked@embarqmail.com wrote: > > Thanks for the info John and for being so candid on the cause. Just > another reason to not be distracted on pre take off checks > > I agree the reeds are questionable if installed wrong or flimsy . I > made brackets for mine which hold them in alignment very well. Glad > you and your passenger came out unscathed.....BTW....I love my > Urologist...and so should every man on this forum... > > Rick Sked > N246RS > Flying fun > Do not archive > Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Koonce <john@jpkoonce.net> > > Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 18:20:03 > To: <RV10-List@matronics.com> > Subject: RV10-List: Door-I'm the guy. > > > > A friend told me that I made your discussions. I lost the door on > takeoff last week. > > A fly-in was finishing up when a pilot friend asked me for a ride in > my RV 10. I had had it parked on the ramp most of the day for static > display. > I'm a Urologist and was on call, but staying in the local area would > still not put me more than 30 min from the hospital if I got called > for an emergency. We taxied out for a quick spin. I'm very aware of > the door problem and have a double check for the door. I personally > close both doors on both sides and check security front and aft both > visually and with hand pressure. When we got in I checked his side as > I usually do and closed my own door. I keep the passenger seat > forward and it makes it difficult to hand pressure check the aft pin > because of the closeness of the seat to the door. Visually it looked > fine. During taxi I of course got paged and this distracted me from > the flying. I handled the page and we continued taxi. > The passenger is a pilot who built, flew and ultimately sold an RV 6. > I'm suspicious this made me a bit cavalier about pre flight steps. We > had already done our run up sequence and started our takeoff roll > fairly quickly. We had lifted off and were climbing at about 80-90 > knots when the door shifted out. It happened very quickly, went on > out, twisted on the hinges and departed. It did not strike the > airframe. We continued the climb, did a go round, and landed > uneventfully. Except for the noise the aircraft handled without > problems. We retrieved the door and there is surprisingly little > damage. The plexiglass has two cracks about 3-4 inches. > Interestingly enough the complete hinge assembly remained attached to > the airframe. The attach point to the door is doubled firbeglass and > the fibreglass layer attached to the hinge stayed with the hinge. The > bolts pulled thru the outer door fibreglass skin. The paint remained > intact and there is almost no visible damage to the outer skin of the > door. The other aircraft with the hard landing had similar findings > after I reviewed his pictures. > > The door departed because the aft pin wasn't engaged. No aircraft > component failed. I have the lights installed for the doors, but > could have missed this with the distractions. I had to readjust them > in the past because the pin is close enough to the magnetic reed that > it sensed the door closed even with the pin outside the engagement > block. I think the best way to manage this is to hand pressure check > the engagement of the pin as well as visually check it. My visual > check wasn't enough. The handle on the door is almost directly over > the front pin, so pulling shut the door seats that easily. When the > door swings in, it is very easy for the aft door to twist and not slip > properly into the aircraft door frame. Rotating the door handle gives > a secure tight feel even when the aft pin is not engaged, but just > simply sliding outside the doorframe on the aircraft skin. The front > pin pulls it tight. Once rolling, I assume the positive pressure from > the vents internally on the door, combined with the negative pressure > on the door surface eventually overwhelms the front pin and at that > point it goes very quickly. > > Both of us in the aircraft were experienced pilots, and as well the > aircraft really never got above 90-100 knots, or above 1000 ft AGL. > Should the pin hold enough to get to altitude or 160 knots, I'm not > sure what would happen, as the wind effect is impressive. Again, the > aircraft handled fine. Hopefully this note will help others to avoid > this event. > > As far as suggested solutions to manage this problem, I am not > convinced that the safety wire technique would work effectively, but I > certainly would encourage it. For a urologist, scrotal > reconstructions pay very well. Please be sure your health insurance > is current. > >


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:26:37 PM PST US
    From: "Carl Froehlich" <carl.froehlich@verizon.net>
    Subject: AFS - Alternator Warning
    Recommend you set the EFIS (or whatever engine monitoring system being used) to alarm on low voltage. With the alternator on line your buss voltage will be between 13.8 and 14.1 volts. A fully charged battery is significantly below this level. Setting a low voltage alarm at say 13.4 volts will immediate tell you your alternator is off line. Assuming a typical battery installation, and now knowing as soon as the alternator fails, you should have ample battery reserve for continued flight to a convenient place to land and get the alternator fixed. Carl Froehlich RV-8A (500 hrs) RV-10 (fuselage fiberglass work) From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jim Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 8:28 PM Subject: RV10-List: AFS - Alternator Warning I am flying with an AFS 3500EE EFIS / Engine Monitor. Yesterday the airplane was being flown and the fuse blew on the alternator field circuit causing the alternator go off line. Turns out the alternator AMPS warning is OFF by default and no warning was heard. It wasn't until the battery was low that an audible / visual alert was presented on the EFIS. Not sure just how long it took for the battery to get to the low voltage warning condition. I have copied the flight data from the EFIS and will review the data to see just how long it took. The EFIS went to backup battery during the flight and the flight was terminated with no other problems. This is just a heads up to those flying with the AFS EFIS to check the alternator AMPS setting in the configuration pages should you want an immediate warning for alternator current. Knowing you have a problem sooner than later is desirable. I did not have the alternator lamp wired (Didn't think I needed it with the EFIS audible alerts). I will be adding this to the panel in the near future. I love the EFIS, I just missed getting this setting correct. Jim Combs (N312F - 110+ hours)


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:04:07 PM PST US
    From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007@cox.net>
    Subject: charger 12248
    Correction to previous post. Sensor will not be required for most situations. For any battery behind the closeout, the most feasible charging will take place with a 12V cigarette receptacle adjacent to or in the top piece; each connector will have ring terminals on the battery terminals. I have 2 680s there and will need two receptacles. A single cigarette plug can be matched to the special connector and plugged into the battery to be maintained. Concorde batteries fall to the gel category, Odyssey are AGM and I hope we don't have any unsealed batteries in the aircraft.


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:46:31 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: charger 12248
    From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2@gmail.com>
    Not sure which Concorde batteries you are referring to David. The RG series are all AGM. The CB series are wet cell. The battery Van's suggests is an RG-25 which is AGM. I don't happen to know of any they sell for aircraft that are gel cell, maybe there are some. On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:01 PM, David McNeill <dlm46007@cox.net> wrote: > Correction to previous post. Sensor will not be required for most > situations. For any battery behind the closeout, the most feasible charging > will take place with a 12V cigarette receptacle adjacent to or in the top > piece; each connector will have ring terminals on the battery terminals. I > have 2 680s there and will need two receptacles. A single cigarette plug can > be matched to the special connector and plugged into the battery to be > maintained. Concorde batteries fall to the gel category, Odyssey are AGM and > I hope we don't have any unsealed batteries in the aircraft.




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv10-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV10-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv10-list
  • Browse RV10-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --