Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 07:44 AM - side baffles side (Pascal)
2. 08:24 AM - Re: side baffles side (Tim Olson)
3. 09:04 AM - Re: side baffles side (Don McDonald)
4. 09:35 AM - Re: side baffles side (Dj Merrill)
5. 09:49 AM - Re: side baffles side (Jesse Saint)
6. 09:49 AM - Re: side baffles side (ricksked@embarqmail.com)
7. 09:49 AM - Re: side baffles side (Jesse Saint)
8. 10:54 AM - Re: side baffles side (Pascal)
9. 11:15 AM - EGT sensor (David McNeill)
10. 12:23 PM - Re: side baffles side (Linn Walters)
11. 01:21 PM - Re: EGT sensor (Jesse Saint)
12. 01:23 PM - Vertical Power plug (Jesse Saint)
13. 01:30 PM - engine mount bolts (Eric_Kallio)
14. 01:51 PM - Re: EFIS backups (marcausman)
15. 02:02 PM - Re: EFIS backups (marcausman)
16. 02:13 PM - Re: engine mount bolts (Bob Turner)
17. 02:25 PM - Re: side baffles side (Kelly McMullen)
18. 02:34 PM - Re: engine mount bolts (Jesse Saint)
19. 02:47 PM - Re: Question about fuel sender float (Kellym)
20. 03:08 PM - Re: Re: Question about fuel sender float (John Trollinger)
21. 03:18 PM - Re: Re: Question about fuel sender float (Pascal)
22. 03:19 PM - Re: Re: Question about fuel sender float (Les Kearney)
23. 03:20 PM - RV10 parts and propeller for sale (LarryMcFarland)
24. 03:20 PM - Odd Firewall Rivet Question (Les Kearney)
25. 03:55 PM - Re: EGT sensor (Thane States)
26. 03:55 PM - Re: EGT sensor (Thane States)
27. 05:22 PM - Re: side baffles side (Don McDonald)
28. 05:47 PM - Re: Vertical Power plug (David Maib)
29. 05:53 PM - Re: EGT sensor (David Maib)
30. 09:27 PM - Re: Re: Question about fuel sender float (John Gonzalez)
31. 09:33 PM - Re: side baffles side (John Gonzalez)
32. 10:18 PM - Re: side baffles side (Don McDonald)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | side baffles side |
I am leaning toward using a single piece side baffle on both sides
versus the 3 piece that comes with the VAN's kit. Any one see any issues
with doing so? I know the industry standard is three (one per
cylinder)and I gather there is a reason for that (movement of cylinders)
so not sure if having a single piece will cause any issues..
Thanks!
P
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: side baffles side |
You wouldn't like it if it came time to remove a cylinder.
You'd have a LOT more work to do.
Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD
do not archive
Pascal wrote:
>
> I am leaning toward using a single piece side baffle on both sides
> versus the 3 piece that comes with the VAN's kit. Any one see any issues
> with doing so? I know the industry standard is three (one per
> cylinder)and I gather there is a reason for that (movement of cylinders)
> so not sure if having a single piece will cause any issues..
> Thanks!
> P
>
>
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: side baffles side |
Tim, how is it more work to do,,,,- Only 7 screws holding it on the side,
a few in fromt, and a few in back.- And the ones in the front and back a
re there no matter how many pieces the baffle is made from....- and also,
help me out here.... is removing a cylinder something that I'm going to ha
ve to do very often?
Thanks, Don McDonald-
-
--- On Sat, 11/21/09, Tim Olson <Tim@myrv10.com> wrote:
From: Tim Olson <Tim@myrv10.com>
Subject: Re: RV10-List: side baffles side
You wouldn't like it if it came time to remove a cylinder.
You'd have a LOT more work to do.
Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD
do not archive
Pascal wrote:
>
> I am leaning toward using a single piece side baffle on both sides
> versus the 3 piece that comes with the VAN's kit. Any one see any issues
> with doing so? I know the industry standard is three (one per
> cylinder)and I gather there is a reason for that (movement of cylinders)
> so not sure if having a single piece will cause any issues..
> Thanks!
> P
>
>
le, List Admin.
=0A=0A=0A
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: side baffles side |
On 11/21/2009 12:02 PM, Don McDonald wrote:
> and also, help me out here.... is removing a cylinder something that I'm
> going to have to do very often?
Depends...
<http://aero-news.net/index.cfm?ContentBlockID=420682ed-fa3d-46bc-82bd-e84403417e8a&>
-Dj
--
Dj Merrill - N1JOV
Glastar Sportsman 2+2 Builder #7118 N421DJ - http://deej.net/sportsman/
Grumman Yankee Driver N9870L - http://deej.net/yankee/
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: side baffles side |
It's enough work getting the front & back assemblies on as it is
without having them tied together. Why add the fabrication work of
making it all 1 piece?
Do not archive
Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation
jesse@saintaviation.com
352-427-0285
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 21, 2009, at 12:02 PM, Don McDonald
<building_partner@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Tim, how is it more work to do,,,, Only 7 screws holding it on the
> side, a few in fromt, and a few in back. And the ones in the front
> and back are there no matter how many pieces the baffle is made
> from.... and also, help me out here.... is removing a cylinder
> something that I'm going to have to do very often?
> Thanks, Don McDonald
>
>
> --- On Sat, 11/21/09, Tim Olson <Tim@myrv10.com> wrote:
>
> From: Tim Olson <Tim@myrv10.com>
> Subject: Re: RV10-List: side baffles side
> To: rv10-list@matronics.com
> Date: Saturday, November 21, 2009, 8:23 AM
>
>
> You wouldn't like it if it came time to remove a cylinder.
> You'd have a LOT more work to do.
>
> Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD
> do not archive
>
>
> Pascal wrote:
> >
> > I am leaning toward using a single piece side baffle on both sides
> > versus the 3 piece that comes with the VAN's kit. Any one see any
> issues
> > with doing so? I know the industry standard is three (one per
> > cylinder)and I gather there is a reason for that (movement of
> cylinders)
> > so not sure if having a single piece will cause any = this
> year's Terrific Free Incentive Gifts provided
> matronics.com/contribution" href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
> " target=_blank>httpbsp; --> h
>
>
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: side baffles side |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Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: side baffles side |
It's enough work getting the front & back assemblies on as it is
without having them tied together. Why add the fabrication work of
making it all 1 piece?
Do not archive
Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation
jesse@saintaviation.com
352-427-0285
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 21, 2009, at 12:02 PM, Don McDonald
<building_partner@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Tim, how is it more work to do,,,, Only 7 screws holding it on the
> side, a few in fromt, and a few in back. And the ones in the front
> and back are there no matter how many pieces the baffle is made
> from.... and also, help me out here.... is removing a cylinder
> something that I'm going to have to do very often?
> Thanks, Don McDonald
>
>
> --- On Sat, 11/21/09, Tim Olson <Tim@myrv10.com> wrote:
>
> From: Tim Olson <Tim@myrv10.com>
> Subject: Re: RV10-List: side baffles side
> To: rv10-list@matronics.com
> Date: Saturday, November 21, 2009, 8:23 AM
>
>
> You wouldn't like it if it came time to remove a cylinder.
> You'd have a LOT more work to do.
>
> Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD
> do not archive
>
>
> Pascal wrote:
> >
> > I am leaning toward using a single piece side baffle on both sides
> > versus the 3 piece that comes with the VAN's kit. Any one see any
> issues
> > with doing so? I know the industry standard is three (one per
> > cylinder)and I gather there is a reason for that (movement of
> cylinders)
> > so not sure if having a single piece will cause any = this
> year's Terrific Free Incentive Gifts provided
> matronics.com/contribution" href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
> " target=_blank>httpbsp; --> h
>
>
Message 8
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: side baffles side |
Thank you for the reply.
While I am flying however, would there be any issue with a single sided
baffle. I am thinking does the baffle need to move at all, is there a
heat expansion issue that having three separate pieces would allow for
expansion and contraction, etc..
Thanks!
P
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 10:23 -0600, Tim Olson wrote:
>
> You wouldn't like it if it came time to remove a cylinder.
> You'd have a LOT more work to do.
>
> Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD
> do not archive
>
>
> Pascal wrote:
> >
> > I am leaning toward using a single piece side baffle on both sides
> > versus the 3 piece that comes with the VAN's kit. Any one see any issues
> > with doing so? I know the industry standard is three (one per
> > cylinder)and I gather there is a reason for that (movement of cylinders)
> > so not sure if having a single piece will cause any issues..
> > Thanks!
> > P
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
Message 9
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I have GRT EIS sensors;
sent to GRT
"My #4 EGT sensor seems to be failing; temperature is consistently 500
degrees below others and bounces around by about 100 increments every second
or so; CHT normal. I ran a ground mag check at 1700 RPM and found the mag
drops to be 1630 and 1620, so I am relatively certain that the engine is
operating normal but sensor is not. Please advise. Aircraft is now at 210
TT."
Anyone else have similar issue?
Message 10
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: side baffles side |
You'll wind up with three pieces sooner or later anyway. Starting out
with three pieces means you get to pick where the cracks go.
Linn
Pascal wrote:
>
> I am leaning toward using a single piece side baffle on both sides
> versus the 3 piece that comes with the VAN's kit. Any one see any issues
> with doing so? I know the industry standard is three (one per
> cylinder)and I gather there is a reason for that (movement of cylinders)
> so not sure if having a single piece will cause any issues..
> Thanks!
> P
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 11
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I don't know a whole lot specifically about the GRT system, but when I
see something like that, I assume there is a bad connection somewhere in
the system, either a pin making bad contact in the connector at the
Engine Monitor, or a bad crimp or spade connection in the FWF area or a
bad sensor. Is your CHT running about the same as the others? If so,
then it's almost certainly a sensor issue, but not necessarily a bad
sensor. I'd check the connections first if the CHT is normal. If both
sensors on the same cylinder are off, that may point to some kind of
problem with that cylinder, but if just one is off, then I'd go for the
sensor or connection.
My first guess would be a splice that is making connection part of the
time and not making connection part of the time, because of the
vibration.
Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation, Inc.
jesse@saintaviation.com
Cell: 352-427-0285
Fax: 815-377-3694
On Nov 21, 2009, at 2:13 PM, David McNeill wrote:
> I have GRT EIS sensors;
> sent to GRT
>
> "My #4 EGT sensor seems to be failing; temperature is consistently 500
degrees below others and bounces around by about 100 increments every
second or so; CHT normal. I ran a ground mag check at 1700 RPM and found
the mag drops to be 1630 and 1620, so I am relatively certain that the
engine is operating normal but sensor is not. Please advise. Aircraft is
now at 210 TT."
>
> Anyone else have similar issue?
>
>
>
Message 12
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Vertical Power plug |
For those on the fence, I just wanted to plug Vertical Power. They are
adding features as advertised on a regular basis, and the new features
are really nice (variable speed trim, wig-wag and auto boost in the
newest update). I did find a bug in the newest version of the software
with how the VP was interpreting engine data from the Dynon. I sent
them the data log as interpreted by the VP and the serial data as
received by the VP (all very easily accessible on the VP-200 Display
Unit with a thumb drive plugged in) and they had a software update
e-mailed to me within 24 hours. BTW, the ability to export logged data
as well as an EGT lean function are also new features with the updated
software. Very impressive and very easy to deal with. I can extract
the logged data from the Dynon with a computer hooked up to the serial
connector (with a USB to Serial converter), but the ease of access by
just plugging in a thumb drive while flying is much nicer. Great people
to deal with and very nice equipment to fly behind.
In case you're wondering, I do not stand to gain by this plug, just
really appreciate great customer service and wanted to share.
Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation, Inc.
jesse@saintaviation.com
Cell: 352-427-0285
Fax: 815-377-3694
Message 13
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | engine mount bolts |
Since Vans has decided not to include the engine mounts in my FWF kit am I going
to have to order the bolts separately as well? I Ordered Lord mounts through
my local FBO/repair station but I don't see the AN 7-26 bolts anywhere on the
parts list for the FWF kit. My assumption is Vans would have sent the bolts with
the mounts and now I have get them on my own. Is this correct?
Eric Kallio
40518 Awaiting engine delivery.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=274129#274129
Message 14
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: EFIS backups |
On my all-electric airplane, I replace the main battery and EFIS backup battery
every two years to make sure they are always in top condition. YMMV.
[quote="Phil.Perry(at)netapp.com"]Just thought about this.
How often do the batteries in the Dynons need to be replaced and are they something
you could buy locally or would you have to go back to the Dynon for them?
Phil
From: MARCUS COOPER [mailto:coop85@verizon.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 8:07 PM
To: rv10-list@matronics.com
Subject: Re: EFIS backups
I have the Grand Rapids display for my primary and the Dynon D10A for the backup.
As mentioned I really like the idea of a 2 hour backup battery and I also
carry a Garmin 496 as my backup nav, although mostly for the XM wx and radio.
In the event of total electrical failure I can still aviate and navigate
without the expense and hassle of the gyros. I've been very pleased so
far with lots of IFR travels.
Marcus
--- On Wed, 11/11/09, davidsoutpost@comcast.net wrote:
do not archive
>
>
> From: davidsoutpost@comcast.net
> Subject: Re: EFIS backups
> To: rv10-list@matronics.com
> Date: Wednesday, November 11, 2009, 8:02 PM
> Thats my plan,,,,,, with its own back-up battery power. Thats a lot cheaper
and lighter than a six pack.
>
> Dave Clifford
>
>
> ---
--------
Marc Ausman
http://www.verticalpower.com "Move up to a modern electrical system"
RV-7 IO-390 Flying
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=274131#274131
Message 15
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: EFIS backups |
Jeff, just to clarify, are you assuming the alternator will provide power if the
battery goes off-line? I don't know your specifics, but the most common voltage
regulators require a battery to be connected to "stabilize" the voltage.
If your battery wire comes loose, for example, the voltage will likely start to
quickly destabilize until the the over-voltage protection disables the alternator.
Then you're left with just the EFIS backup battery. The caveat is that
each of us has a unique airplane so your results may be different depending on
the components you are using.
jeff(at)westcottpress.com wrote:
> I like the notion that the presentation and
> operation of the two units is the same, and that would leave me with 4
> independent sources of power (alternator, battery and the two battery
> packs), but common firmware. ."
>
> Jeff Carpenter
> 40304
--------
Marc Ausman
http://www.verticalpower.com "Move up to a modern electrical system"
RV-7 IO-390 Flying
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=274132#274132
Message 16
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: engine mount bolts |
I need to check on the bolts.
However, Vans is sending Lord mounts, now, with FWF kits (at $200 extra cost, but
still competitive with Chief, etc.).
--------
Bob Turner
RV-10 QB
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=274134#274134
Message 17
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: side baffles side |
IIRC, TCM lifters come out without splitting the case, however if the
cam is damaged the engine will have to come out entirely to send back to
TCM for repair. On new Lycoming engines you should not have any cam or
lifter distress with the roller cam, but if you do, it is still pull the
engine and tear it down, not a cylinder removal. Only ring, piston,
valve, and piston pin plug problems are likely to cause a cylinder
removal by itself.
Dj Merrill wrote:
>
> On 11/21/2009 12:02 PM, Don McDonald wrote:
>> and also, help me out here.... is removing a cylinder something that I'm
>> going to have to do very often?
>
> Depends...
> <http://aero-news.net/index.cfm?ContentBlockID=420682ed-fa3d-46bc-82bd-e84403417e8a&>
>
> -Dj
>
Message 18
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: engine mount bolts |
I just received a FWF kit recently and it did include the bolt kit (it's a bag
with the hardware in it, not the bolts individually).
Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation, Inc.
jesse@saintaviation.com
Cell: 352-427-0285
Fax: 815-377-3694
On Nov 21, 2009, at 4:28 PM, Eric_Kallio wrote:
>
> Since Vans has decided not to include the engine mounts in my FWF kit am I going
to have to order the bolts separately as well? I Ordered Lord mounts through
my local FBO/repair station but I don't see the AN 7-26 bolts anywhere on the
parts list for the FWF kit. My assumption is Vans would have sent the bolts
with the mounts and now I have get them on my own. Is this correct?
>
> Eric Kallio
> 40518 Awaiting engine delivery.
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=274129#274129
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 19
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Question about fuel sender float |
Seems like this is a common gotcha, because Van's plans don't show the second bend,
and the SW instructions aren't the greatest either.
Does Vans sell the arms or do you need to go to SW?
Kelly
bwestfall wrote:
> Bob dont worry the new arms are cheap like a buck or two. Ask me how I know.
Of course shipping and waiting for them isnt.
>
> -Ben
>
>
> From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Gonzalez
> Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 6:03 AM
> To: RV 10 group
> Subject: RE: Question about fuel sender float
>
>
> Ditto, the direction where not very clear and this is critical.
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/chref="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
> > href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
> >
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3716 (20081224) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3716 (20081224) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
--------
Kelly McMullen
A&P/IA, EAA Tech Counselor # 5286
KCHD
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=274144#274144
Message 20
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Question about fuel sender float |
SW sent me a free one when I miss bent mine, but they sent the wrong float
so I just bought the shepherds hook from aircraft spruce for like $5
John
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Kellym <kellym@aviating.com> wrote:
>
> Seems like this is a common gotcha, because Van's plans don't show the
> second bend, and the SW instructions aren't the greatest either.
> Does Vans sell the arms or do you need to go to SW?
> Kelly
>
> bwestfall wrote:
> > Bob don=92t worry the new arms are cheap=85 like a buck or two. Ask me
how I
> know. Of course shipping and waiting for them isn=92t.
> >
> > -Ben
> >
> >
> > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:
> owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Gonzalez
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 6:03 AM
> > To: RV 10 group
> > Subject: RE: Question about fuel sender float
> >
> >
> > Ditto, the direction where not very clear and this is critical.
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">
> http://www.matronics.com/chref="
> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">
> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
> > > href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
> > >
> >
> >
> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 3716 (20081224) __________
> >
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> >
> >
> >
> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 3716 (20081224) __________
> >
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
>
> --------
> Kelly McMullen
> A&P/IA, EAA Tech Counselor # 5286
> KCHD
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=274144#274144
>
>
===========
===========
===========
===========
>
>
Message 21
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Question about fuel sender float |
I needed to go to SW for the arm, Vans would only sell me the complete
set. Poor instructions for sure- think it's one of Tim's Gotcha's, if it
isnt, it should be, as many had this issue with the arm.
I was lucky as I got someone who cared at SW and they shipped me the
arms the same day and it was pretty cheeap, speaking spanish helps alot
BTW ;-)
they are a couple of dollars, it is more for shipping than the parts.
Pascal
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 14:46 -0800, Kellym wrote:
>
> Seems like this is a common gotcha, because Van's plans don't show the second
bend, and the SW instructions aren't the greatest either.
> Does Vans sell the arms or do you need to go to SW?
> Kelly
>
> bwestfall wrote:
> > Bob dont worry the new arms are cheap like a buck or two. Ask me how I know.
Of course shipping and waiting for them isnt.
> >
> > -Ben
> >
> >
> > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Gonzalez
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 6:03 AM
> > To: RV 10 group
> > Subject: RE: Question about fuel sender float
> >
> >
> > Ditto, the direction where not very clear and this is critical.
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/chref="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
> > > href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
> > >
> >
> >
> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3716 (20081224) __________
> >
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> >
> >
> >
> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3716 (20081224) __________
> >
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
>
> --------
> Kelly McMullen
> A&P/IA, EAA Tech Counselor # 5286
> KCHD
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=274144#274144
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 22
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Question about fuel sender float |
Hi Kelly
Vans sells replacement float arms as part "IE F-385 FLOAT ARM" for $5 bucks each.
Of course I only know this because I am psychic.
Cheers
Les
#40643
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Kellym
Sent: November-21-09 3:46 PM
Subject: RV10-List: Re: Question about fuel sender float
Seems like this is a common gotcha, because Van's plans don't show the second bend,
and the SW instructions aren't the greatest either.
Does Vans sell the arms or do you need to go to SW?
Kelly
bwestfall wrote:
> Bob dont worry the new arms are cheap like a buck or two. Ask me how I know.
Of course shipping and waiting for them isnt.
>
> -Ben
>
>
> From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Gonzalez
> Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 6:03 AM
> To: RV 10 group
> Subject: RE: Question about fuel sender float
>
>
> Ditto, the direction where not very clear and this is critical.
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/chref="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
> > href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
> >
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3716 (20081224) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3716 (20081224) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
--------
Kelly McMullen
A&P/IA, EAA Tech Counselor # 5286
KCHD
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=274144#274144
Message 23
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | RV10 parts and propeller for sale |
Hi guys,
Ive been asked to post a page to support the sale of two sets of parts
donated to EAA Chapter 75 for two persons that have gone west. One was
building an RV10 and the other had a controllable variable pitch.
propeller. Either is a bargain for the person in need of them.
More specific information is on a page at the following link.
www.macsmachine.com/html/itemsforsale.htm
<http://www.macsmachine.com/html/itemsforsale.htm>
Id not post these, but when people pass, we do what we can to help.
Thank you for your understanding.
Larry McFarland 601HDS at www.macsmachine.com
N601EZ
and a Zenith group subscriber
do not archive
Message 24
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Odd Firewall Rivet Question |
Hi
Ages ago, when I completed section 27 - Firewall, I left 4 rivets open that
did not show on the plans. Just inboard of the engine mount bolt holes on
the WD-1002 / 1003 L&R engine mounts there is a #30 hole. This hole is found
in both the firewall and on the engine mounts. Strangely, this "extra" hole
is shown on the WD-1002-R-PC on page 27-2 (fig 2) of Rev 0 of the plans. It
does not appear anywhere else in the plans (that I can find).
The rivet call outs on page 27-5 does not reference this hole nor is an
AN426-AD4-5 rivet, the longest callout in the plans, long enough to fill the
hole.
Before I fill these four holes with a longer rivet, can anyone tell me what
their plans indicate?
Inquiring minds need to know.
Cheers
Les
#40643
Message 25
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I had one fail new right out of the box. Do a continuity check and see
if you have a bad lead. Mine had a bad lead inside the connector. Sent
it back for replacement!!
Thane
321BY
----- Original Message -----
From: David McNeill
To: rv10-list@matronics.com
Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 2:13 PM
Subject: RV10-List: EGT sensor
I have GRT EIS sensors;
sent to GRT
"My #4 EGT sensor seems to be failing; temperature is consistently 500
degrees below others and bounces around by about 100 increments every
second or so; CHT normal. I ran a ground mag check at 1700 RPM and found
the mag drops to be 1630 and 1620, so I am relatively certain that the
engine is operating normal but sensor is not. Please advise. Aircraft is
now at 210 TT."
Anyone else have similar issue?
Message 26
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I had one fail new right out of the box. Do a continuity check and see
if you have a bad lead. Mine had a bad lead inside the connector. Sent
it back for replacement!!
Thane
321BY
----- Original Message -----
From: David McNeill
To: rv10-list@matronics.com
Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 2:13 PM
Subject: RV10-List: EGT sensor
I have GRT EIS sensors;
sent to GRT
"My #4 EGT sensor seems to be failing; temperature is consistently 500
degrees below others and bounces around by about 100 increments every
second or so; CHT normal. I ran a ground mag check at 1700 RPM and found
the mag drops to be 1630 and 1620, so I am relatively certain that the
engine is operating normal but sensor is not. Please advise. Aircraft is
now at 210 TT."
Anyone else have similar issue?
Message 27
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: side baffles side |
Jesse, because I built a plenum, I also built the side panels so I could si
mply screw/bolt the plenim directly to the top of the side baffles.- It's
all on cadcam and we just run it out to the shop where it gets punched out
just like Van's does... then over to the brake to put a 90 degree 3/4" lip
on the top....- so it's already-setup.... I'm going to make Pascal a s
et, and he/we were just trying to find out if there were any additional iss
ues.--
Linn, as to your statement about them ending up in 3 pieces anyway.... I us
e a floating system-whereas the screws tighten down on stainless shims, t
hicker than the baffles, thereby letting the aluminum baffle float.- So f
ar 90 hours, no issues.-
Thanks guys, Don
--- On Sat, 11/21/09, Jesse Saint <jesse@saintaviation.com> wrote:
From: Jesse Saint <jesse@saintaviation.com>
Subject: Re: RV10-List: side baffles side
It's enough work getting the front & back assemblies on as it is without ha
ving them tied together. -Why add the fabrication work of making it all 1
piece?
Do not archive
Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation
jesse@saintaviation.com
352-427-0285
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 21, 2009, at 12:02 PM, Don McDonald <building_partner@yahoo.com> wro
te:
Tim, how is it more work to do,,,,- Only 7 screws holding it on the side,
a few in fromt, and a few in back.- And the ones in the front and back a
re there no matter how many pieces the baffle is made from....- and also,
help me out here.... is removing a cylinder something that I'm going to ha
ve to do very often?
Thanks, Don McDonald-
-
--- On Sat, 11/21/09, Tim Olson <Tim@myrv10.com> wrote:
From: Tim Olson <Tim@myrv10.com>
Subject: Re: RV10-List: side baffles side
You wouldn't like it if it came time to remove a cylinder.
You'd have a LOT more work to do.
Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD
do not archive
Pascal wrote:
>
> I am leaning toward using a single piece side baffle on both sides
> versus the 3 piece that comes with the VAN's kit. Any one see any issues
> with doing so? I know the industry standard is three (one per
> cylinder)and I gather there is a reason for that (movement of cylinders)
> so not sure if having a single piece will cause any =---this year
's Terrific Free Incentive Gifts provided
matronics.com/contribution" - - - - - - - - - - - hre
f="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List" target=_blank>httpbsp;
---> h
href="http://www.aeroelectric.com">www.aeroelectric.com
href="http://www.buildersbooks.com">www.buildersbooks.com
href="http://www.homebuilthelp.com">www.homebuilthelp.com
href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/con
tribution
href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics
.com/Navigator?RV10-List
href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
=0A=0A=0A
Message 28
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Vertical Power plug |
I will echo Jesse's comments on Vertical Power. I have been flying my
airplane for a year now and absolutely love my Vertical Power 200
Duo. All of the functions Jesse talks about and great customer
service. I also have the Vertical Power Climate Control System and it
works great, as well.
I have no connection to Vertical Power other than being a very
satisfied customer.
David Maib
40559 flying
On Nov 21, 2009, at 4:21 PM, Jesse Saint wrote:
For those on the fence, I just wanted to plug Vertical Power. They
are adding features as advertised on a regular basis, and the new
features are really nice (variable speed trim, wig-wag and auto boost
in the newest update). I did find a bug in the newest version of the
software with how the VP was interpreting engine data from the
Dynon. I sent them the data log as interpreted by the VP and the
serial data as received by the VP (all very easily accessible on the
VP-200 Display Unit with a thumb drive plugged in) and they had a
software update e-mailed to me within 24 hours. BTW, the ability to
export logged data as well as an EGT lean function are also new
features with the updated software. Very impressive and very easy to
deal with. I can extract the logged data from the Dynon with a
computer hooked up to the serial connector (with a USB to Serial
converter), but the ease of access by just plugging in a thumb drive
while flying is much nicer. Great people to deal with and very nice
equipment to fly behind.
In case you're wondering, I do not stand to gain by this plug, just
really appreciate great customer service and wanted to share.
Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation, Inc.
jesse@saintaviation.com
Cell: 352-427-0285
Fax: 815-377-3694
Message 29
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I had been seeing similar variations on my fuel pressure readout. I
called Sandy at GRT while doing my Condition Inspection and she
seemed pretty positive that my fuel pressure sender was the likely
culprit. She sent me a new one, I installed it, and the fuel pressure
indication is now rock solid. She mentioned that some operators seem
to get a pretty short life out of the fuel senders, (Mine had 163.5
hours on it) and some operators don't have problems. Mine is mounted
on the firewall in the stock Van's location.
Excellent customer service from GRT!
David Maib
40559
flying
On Nov 21, 2009, at 2:13 PM, David McNeill wrote:
I have GRT EIS sensors;
sent to GRT
"My #4 EGT sensor seems to be failing; temperature is consistently
500 degrees below others and bounces around by about 100 increments
every second or so; CHT normal. I ran a ground mag check at 1700 RPM
and found the mag drops to be 1630 and 1620, so I am relatively
certain that the engine is operating normal but sensor is not. Please
advise. Aircraft is now at 210 TT."
Anyone else have similar issue?
Message 30
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Question about fuel sender float |
I knew it too.
JOhn
> From: kearney@shaw.ca
> To: rv10-list@matronics.com
> Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Question about fuel sender float
> Date: Sat=2C 21 Nov 2009 16:05:39 -0700
>
>
>
> Hi Kelly
>
> Vans sells replacement float arms as part "IE F-385 FLOAT ARM" for $5 buc
ks each.
>
> Of course I only know this because I am psychic.
>
> Cheers
>
> Les
> #40643
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server
@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Kellym
> Sent: November-21-09 3:46 PM
> To: rv10-list@matronics.com
> Subject: RV10-List: Re: Question about fuel sender float
>
>
> Seems like this is a common gotcha=2C because Van's plans don't show the
second bend=2C and the SW instructions aren't the greatest either.
> Does Vans sell the arms or do you need to go to SW?
> Kelly
>
> bwestfall wrote:
> > Bob don=99t worry the new arms are cheap like a buck or
two. Ask me how I know. Of course shipping and waiting for them isn
=99t.
> >
> > -Ben
> >
> >
> > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-serv
er@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Gonzalez
> > Sent: Wednesday=2C December 24=2C 2008 6:03 AM
> > To: RV 10 group
> > Subject: RE: Question about fuel sender float
> >
> >
> > Ditto=2C the direction where not very clear and this is critical.
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.c
om/chref="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matron
ics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
> > > href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
> > >
> >
> >
> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus=2C version of virus si
gnature database 3716 (20081224) __________
> >
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> >
> >
> >
> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus=2C version of virus si
gnature database 3716 (20081224) __________
> >
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
>
> --------
> Kelly McMullen
> A&=3BP/IA=2C EAA Tech Counselor # 5286
> KCHD
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=274144#274144
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
===========
===========
===========
===========
>
>
>
Message 31
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | side baffles side |
With an engine that pretty=2C how do you justify a cowling.
John
From: building_partner@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: RV10-List: side baffles side
Jesse=2C because I built a plenum=2C I also built the side panels so I coul
d simply screw/bolt the plenim directly to the top of the side baffles. It
's all on cadcam and we just run it out to the shop where it gets punched o
ut just like Van's does... then over to the brake to put a 90 degree 3/4" l
ip on the top.... so it's already setup.... I'm going to make Pascal a set
=2C and he/we were just trying to find out if there were any additional iss
ues.
Linn=2C as to your statement about them ending up in 3 pieces anyway.... I
use a floating system whereas the screws tighten down on stainless shims=2C
thicker than the baffles=2C thereby letting the aluminum baffle float. So
far 90 hours=2C no issues.
Thanks guys=2C Don
--- On Sat=2C 11/21/09=2C Jesse Saint <jesse@saintaviation.com> wrote:
From: Jesse Saint <jesse@saintaviation.com>
Subject: Re: RV10-List: side baffles side
It's enough work getting the front & back assemblies on as it is without ha
ving them tied together. Why add the fabrication work of making it all 1 p
iece?
Do not archive
Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation
jesse@saintaviation.com
352-427-0285
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 21=2C 2009=2C at 12:02 PM=2C Don McDonald <building_partner@yahoo.co
m> wrote:
Tim=2C how is it more work to do=2C=2C=2C=2C Only 7 screws holding it on t
he side=2C a few in fromt=2C and a few in back. And the ones in the front
and back are there no matter how many pieces the baffle is made from.... a
nd also=2C help me out here.... is removing a cylinder something that I'm g
oing to have to do very often?
Thanks=2C Don McDonald
--- On Sat=2C 11/21/09=2C Tim Olson <Tim@myrv10.com> wrote:
From: Tim Olson <Tim@myrv10.com>
Subject: Re: RV10-List: side baffles side
You wouldn't like it if it came time to remove a cylinder.
You'd have a LOT more work to do.
Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD
do not archive
Pascal wrote:
>
> I am leaning toward using a single piece side baffle on both sides
> versus the 3 piece that comes with the VAN's kit. Any one see any issues
> with doing so? I know the industry standard is three (one per
> cylinder)and I gather there is a reason for that (movement of cylinders)
> so not sure if having a single piece will cause any = this year's Ter
rific Free Incentive Gifts provided
matronics.com/contribution" href="http://www.matron
ics.com/Navigator?RV10-List" target=_blank>httpbsp=3B --> h
href="http://www.aeroelectric.com">www.aeroelectric.com
href="http://www.buildersbooks.com">www.buildersbooks.com
href="http://www.homebuilthelp.com">www.homebuilthelp.com
href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/con
tribution
href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics
.com/Navigator?RV10-List
href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
_blank rel=nofollow>www.aeroelectric.com
/" target=_blank rel=nofollow>www.buildersbooks.com
=_blank rel=nofollow>www.homebuilthelp.com
blank rel=nofollow>http://www.matronics.com/contribution
get=_blank rel=nofollow>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
=nofollow>http://forums.matronics.com
Message 32
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | side baffles side |
Thanks John, tried it without, but it doesn't cool very well!
--- On Sat, 11/21/09, John Gonzalez <indigoonlatigo@msn.com> wrote:
From: John Gonzalez <indigoonlatigo@msn.com>
Subject: RE: RV10-List: side baffles side
With an engine that pretty, how-do you justify a cowling.
-
John
-
From: building_partner@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: RV10-List: side baffles side
Jesse, because I built a plenum, I also built the side panels so I could si
mply screw/bolt the plenim directly to the top of the side baffles.- It's
all on cadcam and we just run it out to the shop where it gets punched out
just like Van's does... then over to the brake to put a 90 degree 3/4" lip
on the top....- so it's already-setup.... I'm going to make Pascal a s
et, and he/we were just trying to find out if there were any additional iss
ues.--
Linn, as to your statement about them ending up in 3 pieces anyway.... I us
e a floating system-whereas the screws tighten down on stainless shims, t
hicker than the baffles, thereby letting the aluminum baffle float.- So f
ar 90 hours, no issues.-
Thanks guys, Don
--- On Sat, 11/21/09, Jesse Saint <jesse@saintaviation.com> wrote:
From: Jesse Saint <jesse@saintaviation.com>
Subject: Re: RV10-List: side baffles side
It's enough work getting the front & back assemblies on as it is without ha
ving them tied together. -Why add the fabrication work of making it all 1
piece?
Do not archive
Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation
jesse@saintaviation.com
352-427-0285
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 21, 2009, at 12:02 PM, Don McDonald <building_partner@yahoo.com> wro
te:
Tim, how is it more work to do,,,,- Only 7 screws holding it on the side,
a few in fromt, and a few in back.- And the ones in the front and back a
re there no matter how many pieces the baffle is made from....- and also,
help me out here.... is removing a cylinder something that I'm going to ha
ve to do very often?
Thanks, Don McDonald-
-
--- On Sat, 11/21/09, Tim Olson <Tim@myrv10.com> wrote:
From: Tim Olson <Tim@myrv10.com>
Subject: Re: RV10-List: side baffles side
You wouldn't like it if it came time to remove a cylinder.
You'd have a LOT more work to do.
Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD
do not archive
Pascal wrote:
>
> I am leaning toward using a single piece side baffle on both sides
> versus the 3 piece that comes with the VAN's kit. Any one see any issues
> with doing so? I know the industry standard is three (one per
> cylinder)and I gather there is a reason for that (movement of cylinders)
> so not sure if having a single piece will cause any =---this year
's Terrific Free Incentive Gifts provided
matronics.com/contribution" - - - - - - - - - - - hre
f="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List" target=_blank>httpbsp;
---> h
href="http://www.aeroelectric.com">www.aeroelectric.com
href="http://www.buildersbooks.com">www.buildersbooks.com
href="http://www.homebuilthelp.com">www.homebuilthelp.com
href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/con
tribution
href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics
.com/Navigator?RV10-List
href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
_blank rel=nofollow>www.aeroelectric.com
/" target=_blank rel=nofollow>www.buildersbooks.com
=_blank rel=nofollow>www.homebuilthelp.com
blank rel=nofollow>http://www.matronics.com/contribution
get=_blank rel=nofollow>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
=nofollow>http://forums.matronics.com
=0A=0A=0A
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|