Today's Message Index:
----------------------
0. 12:12 AM - Just Two More Days Left; Fund Raiser Behind By 12%... (Matt Dralle)
1. 02:42 PM - Re: Rear Seat - Removable Panel (Dick & Vicki Sipp)
2. 05:55 PM - Fly off time 25 hrs or 40hrs (aerosport1)
3. 06:24 PM - Re: Fly off time 25 hrs or 40hrs (Dick & Vicki Sipp)
4. 07:04 PM - Re: Fly off time 25 hrs or 40hrs (Marcus Cooper)
5. 07:18 PM - Re: Fly off time 25 hrs or 40hrs (Don McDonald)
6. 08:33 PM - Re: Fly off time 25 hrs or 40hrs (ricksked@embarqmail.com)
7. 08:40 PM - Re: Fly off time 25 hrs or 40hrs (Pascal)
8. 11:05 PM - Re: Fly off time 25 hrs or 40hrs (Scott Schmidt)
9. 11:23 PM - Re: Fly off time 25 hrs or 40hrs (Robin Marks)
Message 0
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Just Two More Days Left; Fund Raiser Behind By 12%... |
Dear Listers,
This year's List Fund Raiser is still trailing last year by a 12% margin. If you
like the ad-free environment that is the Matronics Email List and Forum experience,
please make a quick Contribution to keep it that way!
http://www.matronics.com/contribution
I've been getting a ton of really nice comments from Contributors regarding the
Lists. Please read over some of them below and see if they don't resonate with
you as well.
Thank you in advance for your generous contribution to support these Lists!
Matt Dralle
Matronics Email List Administrator
--------------------------- Member Feedback ----------------------------
ur web site is a real institution of the whole Experimental
Aircraft subculture.
John G
Thanks Matt for the lists. A lot of good info. Great bunch
of list members. Great videos and no SPAM.
Paul C
It has been a valuable tool.
Troy M
..appreciate the site as much as ever.
Larry M
By using various forums I've learned a ton, received great
advice, made friends, and saved money!
Craig W
Since I've finished [my project], I've not had much to do as
far as fabrication of electrical systems. However,
selectively reading various topics is still very valuable
and Bob's insights and new how to's make me a continuous
subscriber.
Larry F
Matronics user groups are the best tool I have for learning
to build my RV-10!
Philip W
There is always useful knowledge to be found on this list,
and I suspect that it has kept quite a few people out of
trouble over the years it has been in operation. Good
entertainment, too.
Graham H
Great web site. I wish I'd known about it while building.
Bob S
I'm happy to provide some support to this list. It is very
helpful.
Vaughn T
Good service to sport aviation!!
Roger B
Awesome Service you provide for us!
Bill R
My [project] is almost finished! However, it wouldn't be
close without the [this] group.
Douwe B
Great list.
Robert S
I'm not a builder yet but learning lots from the list.
Peter M
Some nonsense, some humor, but mostly good information.
Tony C
Thanks for creating and keeping the Lists. They are
entertaining and always informative!
John M
Thanks for this valuable resource to our community.
Barry H
The list is IMHO the greatest resource on the net.
John B
Thanks again for providing another year of your useful
List service.
Jerry B
Great site indeed, every time I get a message I usually
learn something.
Peter B
You are making a huge contribution to the builder fraternity
and in no small way enhancing sport aviation safety.
Richard G
The List is the SINGLE, MOST IMPORTANT resource I have in
building my RV10. I would be lost without out it. And I
have made a bunch of new friends as well!
Les K
The lists are one of the things I really enjoy, so keep
up the good work.
Freddie H
Every year -- the best value for my time and money!
Owen B
This list is a major contribution to safe building!
Donald K
Really enjoy the daily boost it gives me.
Walter S
In the last 18 months I have been privileged to listen &
ask. I have learnt at the feet of the masters...
Stewart G
You set the standard on how Internet forums should be run
and managed.
Larry W
The Universe is a better place because of you.
Eric J
[The List] helped me get flying, fly off my test hours and
make my systems better. I continue to get and give
information through these lists.
Ralph C
..another GREAT year of advice, answers, and inspiration
courtesy of the Lists and your hard work!!!!
Rob B
..the best forum on the Internet!
Robert B
I can't tell you how grateful I am for your list and your
subscribers to keep me up to date and holding the dream.
Ashley M
This page makes it easy to contribute.
Jeffrey P
Thank you for your expertise in creating & running the
much useful lists!
Anthony P
Thanks for providing our advertising free on line community.
George R
Thanks for maintaining the equipment and software to
provide this valuable source of information to us
individuals. Your effort is appreciated by many more people
than you realize.
Ross H
Thanks for a great site. Although the project is complete
and flying I still get a wealth of information from all
the messages.
Marcus C
Only learned about you six months ago...my RV-7A is just
finished, but the list has been helpful. Wish I had
discovered you sooner.
Jack B
This is an invaluable communications media for us
common minded folks to exchange technical and other
information.
George H
..great service that you provide.
David W
..still appreciate your list.
Alain L
[The] Lists are an invaluable resource. I know that it has
helped me enormously in my project.
William B
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Rear Seat - Removable Panel |
I installed two approx. 4x4 inch access panels above each of two com
antennas so I could remove them if required.
Dick Sipp
N110DV
From: Perry, Phil
Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2009 6:16 PM
Subject: RV10-List: Rear Seat - Removable Panel
I'm stealing one of Deems photos here.
http://www.deemsrv10.com/album/Sec%2033%20Baggage%20Area/slides/DSC02724.
JPG
In the process of running conduit today, I was thinking it might be nice
to build a removable panel into the outboard section of the rear seat
pans. This way I could remove the seat pans later to access underneath
them at a later date without having wires running through the holes.
This would be nice for running coax to the antenna's and riveting in the
doublers...
Am I worried out nothing? Have any of you created panels in the seat
pans to leave the conduit and wiring undisturbed when the seat pan is
removed?
I'd like to leave this seat out as long as possible.
Phil
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Fly off time 25 hrs or 40hrs |
I am looking for some feed back on the hours that people were required
to fly off if they had the stock 2 blade Hartzell prop and the DA45 experimental
engine from Aerosport Power or other know builder. Was it 25 or 40. And if 25
why instead of 40.
Just curious. I have heard both ways with this combo. Email me off the list
if you would like.
Thanks Geoff
--------
Geoff Combs
RV-10 QB N829GW
Finishing
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=275369#275369
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Fly off time 25 hrs or 40hrs |
I was given 40 due to experimental engine. (Lycoming kit built by
authorized shop like Aerosport)
There is more than enough to do in the first 40 hours particularly if you
have an advanced technology panel.
Dick Sipp
N110DV
--------------------------------------------------
From: "aerosport1" <g.combs@aerosportmodeling.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 8:53 PM
Subject: RV10-List: Fly off time 25 hrs or 40hrs
> <g.combs@aerosportmodeling.com>
>
> I am looking for some feed back on the hours that people were required
> to fly off if they had the stock 2 blade Hartzell prop and the DA45
> experimental engine from Aerosport Power or other know builder. Was it 25
> or 40. And if 25 why instead of 40.
> Just curious. I have heard both ways with this combo. Email me off the
> list
> if you would like.
>
> Thanks Geoff
>
> --------
> Geoff Combs
> RV-10 QB N829GW
> Finishing
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=275369#275369
>
>
>
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Fly off time 25 hrs or 40hrs |
I was given 40 hours primarily due to the Experimental stamp on the fuel
injector and non-Lycoming data plate (if I remember correctly). Probably
would have been 25 otherwise. I have the standard Hartzell prop.
Marcus
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of aerosport1
Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 8:54 PM
Subject: RV10-List: Fly off time 25 hrs or 40hrs
Do not archive
<g.combs@aerosportmodeling.com>
I am looking for some feed back on the hours that people were required
to fly off if they had the stock 2 blade Hartzell prop and the DA45
experimental engine from Aerosport Power or other know builder. Was it 25 or
40. And if 25 why instead of 40.
Just curious. I have heard both ways with this combo. Email me off the list
if you would like.
Thanks Geoff
--------
Geoff Combs
RV-10 QB N829GW
Finishing
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=275369#275369
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Fly off time 25 hrs or 40hrs |
Ditto to what Dick said.... I knew as a new pilot, the extra time certainly
wouldn't do me any harm....- and I strongly agree with the statement tha
t holding a ppl is only a license to learn.
Don McDonald
--- On Sun, 11/29/09, Dick & Vicki Sipp <rsipp@earthlink.net> wrote:
From: Dick & Vicki Sipp <rsipp@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: RV10-List: Fly off time 25 hrs or 40hrs
I was given 40 due to experimental engine.- (Lycoming kit built by
authorized shop like Aerosport)
There is more than enough to do in the first 40 hours particularly if you
have an advanced technology panel.
Dick Sipp
N110DV
--------------------------------------------------
From: "aerosport1" <g.combs@aerosportmodeling.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 8:53 PM
Subject: RV10-List: Fly off time 25 hrs or 40hrs
> <g.combs@aerosportmodeling.com>
>
> I am looking for some feed back on the hours that people were required
> to fly off if they had the stock 2 blade Hartzell prop and the DA45
> experimental engine from Aerosport Power or other know builder. Was it 25
> or 40. And if 25 why instead of 40.
> Just curious. I have heard both ways with this combo. Email me off the
> list
> if you would like.
>
> Thanks Geoff
>
> --------
> Geoff Combs
> RV-10 QB N829GW
> Finishing
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=275369#275369
>
>
>
le, List Admin.
=0A=0A=0A
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Fly off time 25 hrs or 40hrs |
Its the engine Geoff...
------Original Message------
From: aerosport1
Sender: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
ReplyTo: rv10-list@matronics.com
Sent: Nov 29, 2009 5:53 PM
Subject: RV10-List: Fly off time 25 hrs or 40hrs
I am looking for some feed back on the hours that people were required
to fly off if they had the stock 2 blade Hartzell prop and the DA45 experimental
engine from Aerosport Power or other know builder. Was it 25 or 40. And if 25
why instead of 40.
Just curious. I have heard both ways with this combo. Email me off the list
if you would like.
Thanks Geoff
--------
Geoff Combs
RV-10 QB N829GW
Finishing
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=275369#275369
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Fly off time 25 hrs or 40hrs |
Generally expect 40 hours if you have anything that is non certified- so an
experimental engine not certified (mine has Eci cylinders) would require 40
hours. The DAR or FAA is the final decision on this however. I wouldn't, nor
am I, be in any hurry to get the passengers, I will ask for an extended
flyoff area after 35 hours from my DAR but I plan to spend at least 40 hours
getting to know the frankenstein I created.
My suggestion is ask around and get an idea of what others in your area that
have used the same inspector you'll use had to do if you really need to
know.
P
--------------------------------------------------
From: "aerosport1" <g.combs@aerosportmodeling.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 5:53 PM
Subject: RV10-List: Fly off time 25 hrs or 40hrs
> <g.combs@aerosportmodeling.com>
>
> I am looking for some feed back on the hours that people were required
> to fly off if they had the stock 2 blade Hartzell prop and the DA45
> experimental engine from Aerosport Power or other know builder. Was it 25
> or 40. And if 25 why instead of 40.
> Just curious. I have heard both ways with this combo. Email me off the
> list
> if you would like.
>
> Thanks Geoff
>
> --------
> Geoff Combs
> RV-10 QB N829GW
> Finishing
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=275369#275369
>
>
>
Message 8
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Fly off time 25 hrs or 40hrs |
I am one that received 25 hours with the exact same setup that Geoff has.
It depends on the DAR. My DAR saw that the engine had no AD's with documentation
and had a hartzell prop.
I am not saying that he was right or wrong but there will be some different opinions
when it comes to the fly off hours. I know that there are others that received
25 hours too. I would not be upset at 40 hours either. It does take time
to learn and fix up your newly finished plane.
Today, my plane is so much better than the first day. When you roll through 500
hours you'll be happy you took the time to learn and test everything on your
plane.
Scott
SLC,UT
On Nov 29, 2009, at 9:39 PM, "Pascal" <rv10builder@verizon.net> wrote:
Generally expect 40 hours if you have anything that is non certified- so an experimental
engine not certified (mine has Eci cylinders) would require 40 hours.
The DAR or FAA is the final decision on this however. I wouldn't, nor am I,
be in any hurry to get the passengers, I will ask for an extended flyoff area
after 35 hours from my DAR but I plan to spend at least 40 hours getting to know
the frankenstein I created.
My suggestion is ask around and get an idea of what others in your area that have
used the same inspector you'll use had to do if you really need to know.
P
--------------------------------------------------
From: "aerosport1" <g.combs@aerosportmodeling.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 5:53 PM
Subject: RV10-List: Fly off time 25 hrs or 40hrs
I am looking for some feed back on the hours that people were required
to fly off if they had the stock 2 blade Hartzell prop and the DA45 experimental
engine from Aerosport Power or other know builder. Was it 25 or 40. And if 25
why instead of 40.
Just curious. I have heard both ways with this combo. Email me off the list
if you would like.
Thanks Geoff
--------
Geoff Combs
RV-10 QB N829GW
Finishing
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=275369#275369
Message 9
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Fly off time 25 hrs or 40hrs |
Consistency would be nice. A Subaru 7A on my field received a 25 hours
Phase 1. Really??? We were at 44 hours before we had everything ironed
out with the advanced avionics and temp issues. Most plans built RV's
should not take that long. Regardless, just like riveting, fiberglass,
paint, one day it will all be behind you. Enjoy what you are doing.
Robin
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
ricksked@embarqmail.com
Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: RV10-List: Fly off time 25 hrs or 40hrs
Its the engine Geoff...
------Original Message------
From: aerosport1
Sender: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
ReplyTo: rv10-list@matronics.com
Sent: Nov 29, 2009 5:53 PM
Subject: RV10-List: Fly off time 25 hrs or 40hrs
<g.combs@aerosportmodeling.com>
I am looking for some feed back on the hours that people were required
to fly off if they had the stock 2 blade Hartzell prop and the DA45
experimental engine from Aerosport Power or other know builder. Was it
25 or 40. And if 25 why instead of 40.
Just curious. I have heard both ways with this combo. Email me off the
list
if you would like.
Thanks Geoff
--------
Geoff Combs
RV-10 QB N829GW
Finishing
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=275369#275369
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
11/29/09 19:31:00
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|