Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 08:58 AM - CI-122 Template (Perry, Phil)
2. 10:09 AM - Re: CI-122 Template (William Curtis)
3. 10:43 AM - Re: Re: CHP Stick Grips... company change (Jae Chang)
4. 11:33 AM - Re: CI-122 Template (tsts4)
5. 12:25 PM - Re: Re: CHP Stick Grips... company change (Bill Mauledriver Watson)
6. 12:51 PM - NavWorx ADS-B transceiver (Kelly McMullen)
7. 12:54 PM - Re: Re: CI-122 Template (Kelly McMullen)
8. 05:04 PM - Re: Re: CHP Stick Grips... company change (gary)
9. 05:41 PM - Re: Re: CHP Stick Grips... company change (Bill Mauledriver Watson)
10. 08:54 PM - tank question (DLM)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
RG9lcyBhbnlvbmUgaGF2ZSB0aGUgZGltZW5zaW9ucyBvciBhIHRlbXBsYXRlIGZvciB0aGUgQ29t
YW50IENJLTEyMiBkb3VibGVyPyAgDQoNCkknZCBsaWtlIHRvIGdvIGFoZWFkIGFuZCBwdXQgdGhl
IGRvdWJsZXIgb24gdGhlIGJlbGx5IGFuZCBwdWxsIHRoZSBjb2F4IHdoaWxlIEkgaGF2ZSBkZWNl
bnQgYWNjZXNzLiANCg0KVGhhbmtzLA0KUGhpbA0K
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: CI-122 Template |
A Google search of "Comant CI-122" returns
this<http://www.comant.com/Uploads/technicalsheets/pp_CI_122712.pdf>as
the forth listing.
http://www.comant.com/Uploads/technicalsheets/pp_CI_122712.pdf
--
William
N40237 - http://wcurtis.nerv10.com/
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Perry, Phil <Phil.Perry@netapp.com> wrote:
> Does anyone have the dimensions or a template for the Comant CI-122
> doubler?
>
> I'd like to go ahead and put the doubler on the belly and pull the coax
> while I have decent access.
>
> Thanks,
> Phil
>
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: CHP Stick Grips... company change |
Rick... thanks. this is the first I have heard of a preference for the
Infinity grips for this reason. Also, it does look like the Infinity
grips have a similar amount of forward sweep on them as to the Tostens.
Thanks for all the other responses. Initially, I wanted to avoid all
this trouble by going with the Ray Allen grips, which seeemed nice and
simple enough for me. However, i just did not like stand the individual
trim buttons instead of a hat switch. I emailed Ray Allen about
switching out for a hat switch, but they replied negative on that
request. Always somethin...
I did find Robin's old post about how he increased the bend angle in the
stick here. It does seem simple enough.
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?t=59431&highlight=infinity+control+stick+robin
Now to investigate Rick's issue. ;)
Jae
Rick wrote:
>
> Jae,
>
> I have the CH, now Tosten grips. They work fine and mine just brush the
> switches and CB's on the panel at full forward. I cut the sticks a low as
> they would go to install the grips. FWIW, nothing against them but on my
> next aircraft I'm using the Infinity grips and modify the stick to allow
> them to not hit the panel. Reason? They just feel nicer to me and the
> switches have a more tactile feel and are less apt to be inadvertently
> actuated, my 2 cents as always,
>
> Rick Sked
> N246RS coming close to the magical 100 hours
>
>
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: CI-122 Template |
Just food for thought, but I know some folks make their antenna doublers larger
than just the antenna base plate and add flanges either by bending or riveting
on angle. The purpose of the flange(s) is to be able to tie the doubler into
some structure (ie a rib, frame, or stiffener) other than just the skin.
--------
Todd Stovall
728TT (reserved)
RV-10 Empacone, Wings
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=292960#292960
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: CHP Stick Grips... company change |
It appears that the Tostens can be setup so they can rotate freely while
in operation. For example, rotating enough so that it can be fully
gripped with the left or right hand. Can anyone comment?
I've handled both grips but haven't flown with either. I preferred the
Tostens due to fewer switches and a more pleasing fit and feel. But
again, I haven't flown either of them.
Bill "working on pants for his third leg" Watson
Jae Chang wrote:
>
> Rick... thanks. this is the first I have heard of a preference for the
> Infinity grips for this reason. Also, it does look like the Infinity
> grips have a similar amount of forward sweep on them as to the Tostens.
>
> Thanks for all the other responses. Initially, I wanted to avoid all
> this trouble by going with the Ray Allen grips, which seeemed nice and
> simple enough for me. However, i just did not like stand the
> individual trim buttons instead of a hat switch. I emailed Ray Allen
> about switching out for a hat switch, but they replied negative on
> that request. Always somethin...
>
> I did find Robin's old post about how he increased the bend angle in
> the stick here. It does seem simple enough.
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?t=59431&highlight=infinity+control+stick+robin
>
>
> Now to investigate Rick's issue. ;)
> Jae
>
> Rick wrote:
>>
>> Jae,
>>
>> I have the CH, now Tosten grips. They work fine and mine just brush the
>> switches and CB's on the panel at full forward. I cut the sticks a
>> low as
>> they would go to install the grips. FWIW, nothing against them but on my
>> next aircraft I'm using the Infinity grips and modify the stick to allow
>> them to not hit the panel. Reason? They just feel nicer to me and the
>> switches have a more tactile feel and are less apt to be inadvertently
>> actuated, my 2 cents as always,
>>
>> Rick Sked
>> N246RS coming close to the magical 100 hours
>>
>>
>
>
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | NavWorx ADS-B transceiver |
NavWorx Developing ADS-B Transceiver For GA
Existing Receive-Only Units Will Be Eligible For Upgrades
NavWorx is currently developing ADS-B transmitter capability,
which will be offered as an upgrade option for current ADS600
owners and integrated into the ADS600-B transmit and receive unit.
The company announced Wednesday that FCC approval of the
transmitter is expected shortly. Current ADS600 units function as
receive-only devices, however, can be upgraded for two-way
communication.
Two-way communication forms the foundation of the new NextGen
air traffic control system called ADS-B, or Automatic Dependent
Surveillance - Broadcast. The NavWorx ADS600 product line allows
pilots to receive ADS-B signals including TIS-B traffic and FIS-B
flight and weather information for display on a variety of devices.
ADS-B signals are received from Air Traffic Control as well as
other equipped aircraft. The new ADS600-B has the added capability
of transmitting an aircraft's GPS-derived position, vector and
speed. The benefits of ADS-B communications are improved air
traffic safety and enhanced situational awareness for pilots. The
NavWorx ADS600 line of products operate off an expanding network of
ADS-B transmitters across the continental U.S., Gulf of Mexico, and
Alaska.
The NavWorx product line consists of the ADS600 and PADS600,
both ADS-B receivers designed for certified, experimental, and
light-sport aircraft Standard upgrade pricing will be $1,000.00.
Customers who purchased the remote-mounted ADS600, or portable
PADS600, can upgrade with the transmitter for $600.00 through April
18, 2010. ADS600-B pricing will be $2,495.00. Customers who
purchase the remote-mounted ADS600-B can do so for $2,120.75 before
April 18, 2010. A fully refundable payment is required at the time
of purchase. NavWorx is also offering 40-percent off its
transmitter upgrade for the company's ADS600 ADS-B traffic and
weather receiver for a limited time, as well as a 15-percent
discount on its forthcoming ADS600-B transceiver unit. This new
unit will incorporate both transmit and receive capabilities. To
take advantage of these limited-time discounts, customers must make
their purchase prior to April 18, 2010.
FMI: www.navworx.com
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: CI-122 Template |
IIRC doublers are supposed to be at least 50% larger surface area than
the antenna they support.
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 11:32 AM, tsts4 <tsts4@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> Just food for thought, but I know some folks make their antenna doublers larger
than just the antenna base plate and add flanges either by bending or riveting
on angle. The purpose of the flange(s) is to be able to tie the doubler into
some structure (ie a rib, frame, or stiffener) other than just the skin.
>
> --------
> Todd Stovall
> 728TT (reserved)
> RV-10 Empacone, Wings
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=292960#292960
>
>
Message 8
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: CHP Stick Grips... company change |
Bill, I have them and love them. I have them rotate and fits my hand
perfectly. I did have to reform the stick to prevent them hitting the
panel, but I have a Stein panel so don't know if they would hit the regular
one. I too did not need or want all those extra switches.
Gary Specketer
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill Mauledriver
Watson
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2010 2:24 PM
Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: CHP Stick Grips... company change
<MauleDriver@nc.rr.com>
It appears that the Tostens can be setup so they can rotate freely while
in operation. For example, rotating enough so that it can be fully
gripped with the left or right hand. Can anyone comment?
I've handled both grips but haven't flown with either. I preferred the
Tostens due to fewer switches and a more pleasing fit and feel. But
again, I haven't flown either of them.
Bill "working on pants for his third leg" Watson
Jae Chang wrote:
>
> Rick... thanks. this is the first I have heard of a preference for the
> Infinity grips for this reason. Also, it does look like the Infinity
> grips have a similar amount of forward sweep on them as to the Tostens.
>
> Thanks for all the other responses. Initially, I wanted to avoid all
> this trouble by going with the Ray Allen grips, which seeemed nice and
> simple enough for me. However, i just did not like stand the
> individual trim buttons instead of a hat switch. I emailed Ray Allen
> about switching out for a hat switch, but they replied negative on
> that request. Always somethin...
>
> I did find Robin's old post about how he increased the bend angle in
> the stick here. It does seem simple enough.
>
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?t=59431&highlight=infinity+control
+stick+robin
>
>
> Now to investigate Rick's issue. ;)
> Jae
>
> Rick wrote:
>>
>> Jae,
>>
>> I have the CH, now Tosten grips. They work fine and mine just brush the
>> switches and CB's on the panel at full forward. I cut the sticks a
>> low as
>> they would go to install the grips. FWIW, nothing against them but on my
>> next aircraft I'm using the Infinity grips and modify the stick to allow
>> them to not hit the panel. Reason? They just feel nicer to me and the
>> switches have a more tactile feel and are less apt to be inadvertently
>> actuated, my 2 cents as always,
>>
>> Rick Sked
>> N246RS coming close to the magical 100 hours
>>
>>
>
>
Message 9
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: CHP Stick Grips... company change |
Hey Gary, glad to hear they can rotate. That seems like a neat
feature. I have a Stein panel blank too and I had to do the bending of
the stick to get it to clear but it seems to work in my pre-flight cockpit.
I'm getting close....
Bill "the '10 flies in '10 Watson
gary wrote:
>
> Bill, I have them and love them. I have them rotate and fits my hand
> perfectly. I did have to reform the stick to prevent them hitting the
> panel, but I have a Stein panel so don't know if they would hit the regular
> one. I too did not need or want all those extra switches.
>
> Gary Specketer
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill Mauledriver
> Watson
> Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2010 2:24 PM
> To: rv10-list@matronics.com
> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: CHP Stick Grips... company change
>
> <MauleDriver@nc.rr.com>
>
> It appears that the Tostens can be setup so they can rotate freely while
> in operation. For example, rotating enough so that it can be fully
> gripped with the left or right hand. Can anyone comment?
>
> I've handled both grips but haven't flown with either. I preferred the
> Tostens due to fewer switches and a more pleasing fit and feel. But
> again, I haven't flown either of them.
>
> Bill "working on pants for his third leg" Watson
>
> Jae Chang wrote:
>
>>
>> Rick... thanks. this is the first I have heard of a preference for the
>> Infinity grips for this reason. Also, it does look like the Infinity
>> grips have a similar amount of forward sweep on them as to the Tostens.
>>
>> Thanks for all the other responses. Initially, I wanted to avoid all
>> this trouble by going with the Ray Allen grips, which seeemed nice and
>> simple enough for me. However, i just did not like stand the
>> individual trim buttons instead of a hat switch. I emailed Ray Allen
>> about switching out for a hat switch, but they replied negative on
>> that request. Always somethin...
>>
>> I did find Robin's old post about how he increased the bend angle in
>> the stick here. It does seem simple enough.
>>
>>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?t=59431&highlight=infinity+control
> +stick+robin
>
>> Now to investigate Rick's issue. ;)
>> Jae
>>
>> Rick wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Jae,
>>>
>>> I have the CH, now Tosten grips. They work fine and mine just brush the
>>> switches and CB's on the panel at full forward. I cut the sticks a
>>> low as
>>> they would go to install the grips. FWIW, nothing against them but on my
>>> next aircraft I'm using the Infinity grips and modify the stick to allow
>>> them to not hit the panel. Reason? They just feel nicer to me and the
>>> switches have a more tactile feel and are less apt to be inadvertently
>>> actuated, my 2 cents as always,
>>>
>>> Rick Sked
>>> N246RS coming close to the magical 100 hours
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Message 10
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Are the holes for the T-1012 Zee attachment to the spar pre drilled? What is
the distance between the aft tank baffle and the main spar? I see T-1004
mentioned in the plans but can't find T-1004 on the Vans site parts list?
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|