RV10-List Digest Archive

Thu 04/08/10


Total Messages Posted: 23



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 08:46 AM - Before mounting engine (Rob Kochman)
     2. 09:26 AM - Re: Before mounting engine (Lew Gallagher)
     3. 10:34 AM - Fuel Pump/Filter (Perry, Phil)
     4. 10:40 AM - Re: Before mounting engine (Bill Mauledriver Watson)
     5. 11:06 AM - Re: Fuel Pump/Filter (Jesse Saint)
     6. 11:45 AM - Re: Fuel Pump/Filter (Perry, Phil)
     7. 11:50 AM - Re: Before mounting engine (Rob Kochman)
     8. 01:02 PM - Re: Before mounting engine (DLM)
     9. 01:12 PM - Re: Before mounting engine ()
    10. 01:53 PM - Re: Before mounting engine (Michael Kraus)
    11. 02:42 PM - Re: Before mounting engine (johngoodman)
    12. 03:09 PM - Re: Before mounting engine (Don McDonald)
    13. 04:58 PM - Re: Before mounting engine (Ron B.)
    14. 06:00 PM - To Magento - Or Not To Magento (Patrick Pulis)
    15. 06:57 PM - Re: Before mounting engine (Kelly McMullen)
    16. 07:06 PM - Re: To Magento - Or Not To Magento (Kelly McMullen)
    17. 07:13 PM - Re: To Magento - Or Not To Magento (orchidman)
    18. 08:31 PM - windshield brace wiring (woxofswa)
    19. 08:47 PM - Re: windshield brace wiring (AirMike)
    20. 09:03 PM - Re: windshield brace wiring (Jim Berry)
    21. 09:17 PM - Re: To Magento - Or Not To Magento (Jim Berry)
    22. 09:33 PM - Re: Before mounting engine (Jim Berry)
    23. 10:39 PM - Re: Re: To Magento - Or Not To Magento (Robin Marks)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:46:06 AM PST US
    Subject: Before mounting engine
    From: Rob Kochman <rv10rob@gmail.com>
    My shiny new Aero Sport engine arrived yesterday. It looks great--I'm almost afraid to touch it. Anyway, I'm following Van's FWF plans and am at the point where it says to actually mount the engine. Is there anything else I should do before that? Seems like access will actually be pretty good after it's mounted. Thanks... -Rob -- Rob Kochman RV-10 "Finishing" Kit Woodinville, WA (near Seattle) http://kochman.net/N819K


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:26:27 AM PST US
    From: "Lew Gallagher" <lewgall@charter.net>
    Subject: Re: Before mounting engine
    Hey Rob, I agree, that new engine that costs more than a lot of complete cars, is very impressive! We used an engine leveler on the engine jack and marked the links on the chains to the mounting ears so that once the engine mount was on the firewall and the fit was good, we could duplicate the engine on/off procedure very easily. Then, as with everything else on this project, when you do and re-do, it's not a big deal. I.e., after all the cowl/prop measuring and fitting, it was easier to remove the engine and replace it with two 5 gal. jugs of water for counter wt. for painting and firewall wiring etc. Once you plan all your firewall forward plumbing and wiring, it is MUCH easier to run your cables to the heater vents, for example, with the engine off. Think about parking brakes, brake resevoir, heat shield, other stuff you might want to rivet on to the firewall. Again, with the ease of temporarily installing the engine, don't think of it as "once it's on, it's on for good". Maybe (hopefully) you've already done your wiring/panel layout and construction, but I did not like the tight fit of the battery cable through the firewall where Van's shows it, and went with the bigger insulated bulkhead connector as in William Curtis's site (http://nerv10.com/wcurtis/90Electrical/EL1h.html). That also gives you cabin side direct access to battery +. I wouldn't even punch that hole in the firewall where the instructions say. And don't forget the diodes across the master, and starter solonoids, as seen in his pictures. I'm sure there's lots more, but that's starters off the top of my head. Later, - Lew ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob Kochman" <rv10rob@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 11:39 AM Subject: RV10-List: Before mounting engine > > My shiny new Aero Sport engine arrived yesterday. It looks great--I'm > almost afraid to touch it. Anyway, I'm following Van's FWF plans and > am at the point where it says to actually mount the engine. Is there > anything else I should do before that? Seems like access will > actually be pretty good after it's mounted. > > Thanks... > > -Rob > > -- > Rob Kochman > RV-10 "Finishing" Kit > Woodinville, WA (near Seattle) > http://kochman.net/N819K > > >


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:34:05 AM PST US
    Subject: Fuel Pump/Filter
    From: "Perry, Phil" <Phil.Perry@netapp.com>
    Looking on Vans site, they sell the ES Airflow pumps and filters for the 320-360's, but I don't see anything that's specific to the 540. http://www.vansaircraft.com/cgi-bin/catalog.cgi?ident=1270747858-60-69& b rowse=engines&product=fi-install Is the 320-360 pump and filter the same as the one for the 540? Phil


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:40:37 AM PST US
    From: Bill Mauledriver Watson <MauleDriver@nc.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Before mounting engine
    I would just comment that while the engine is easy on/off, it isn't with the prop attached. So if you mount the engine (easy), and mount the prop (easy), I strongly suggest removing the prop (easy) before removing the engine (easy. If you do as I did and remove the engine with the prop in place (easy), it's a lot of fun trying put the (##%&#$%@$#%) combination back on. Then you end up removing the prop from the unmounted engine (less than fun) before remounting. Bill "remembering that the HF load leveler should never be used on aircraft engines, HA HA" Watson Rob Kochman wrote: > > My shiny new Aero Sport engine arrived yesterday. It looks great--I'm > almost afraid to touch it. Anyway, I'm following Van's FWF plans and > am at the point where it says to actually mount the engine. Is there > anything else I should do before that? Seems like access will > actually be pretty good after it's mounted. > > Thanks... > > -Rob > >


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:06:04 AM PST US
    From: Jesse Saint <jesse@saintaviation.com>
    Subject: Re: Fuel Pump/Filter
    If it's for an injected engine, then it should be the same. The part numbers should be "ES Airflow Filter" and ES Airflow Fuel Pump" which is needed for the IO-540. Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. jesse@saintaviation.com Cell: 352-427-0285 Fax: 815-377-3694 On Apr 8, 2010, at 1:31 PM, Perry, Phil wrote: > Looking on Vans site, they sell the ES Airflow pumps and filters for the 320-360=92s, but I don=92t see anything that=92s specific to the 540. > > http://www.vansaircraft.com/cgi-bin/catalog.cgi?ident=1270747858-60-69&b rowse=engines&product=fi-install > > Is the 320-360 pump and filter the same as the one for the 540? > > Phil > > > > > > > > >


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:45:50 AM PST US
    Subject: Fuel Pump/Filter
    From: "Perry, Phil" <Phil.Perry@netapp.com>
    Thanks Jesse... I'm breaking out the check book again... J Phil From: Jesse Saint [mailto:jesse@saintaviation.com] Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 1:04 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Fuel Pump/Filter If it's for an injected engine, then it should be the same. The part numbers should be "ES Airflow Filter" and ES Airflow Fuel Pump" which is needed for the IO-540. Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. jesse@saintaviation.com Cell: 352-427-0285 Fax: 815-377-3694 On Apr 8, 2010, at 1:31 PM, Perry, Phil wrote: Looking on Vans site, they sell the ES Airflow pumps and filters for the 320-360's, but I don't see anything that's specific to the 540. http://www.vansaircraft.com/cgi-bin/catalog.cgi?ident=1270747858-60-69& b rowse=engines&product=fi-install Is the 320-360 pump and filter the same as the one for the 540? Phil style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; ">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List blue; text-decoration: underline; ">http://forums.matronics.com style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; ">http://www.matronics.com/contribution


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:50:08 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Before mounting engine
    From: Rob Kochman <rv10rob@gmail.com>
    Thanks, guys... I'm currently planning on borrowing an engine hoist for a few days, mounting the engine, and not taking it off again. Am I kidding myself? Anyone have success with this? -Rob On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Bill Mauledriver Watson < MauleDriver@nc.rr.com> wrote: > MauleDriver@nc.rr.com> > > I would just comment that while the engine is easy on/off, it isn't with > the prop attached. So if you mount the engine (easy), and mount the prop > (easy), I strongly suggest removing the prop (easy) before removing the > engine (easy. > > If you do as I did and remove the engine with the prop in place (easy), > it's a lot of fun trying put the (##%&#$%@$#%) combination back on. Then > you end up removing the prop from the unmounted engine (less than fun) > before remounting. > Bill "remembering that the HF load leveler should never be used on aircraft > engines, HA HA" Watson > > > Rob Kochman wrote: > >> >> My shiny new Aero Sport engine arrived yesterday. It looks great--I'm >> almost afraid to touch it. Anyway, I'm following Van's FWF plans and >> am at the point where it says to actually mount the engine. Is there >> anything else I should do before that? Seems like access will >> actually be pretty good after it's mounted. >> >> Thanks... >> >> -Rob >> >> >> > > -- Rob Kochman RV-10 "Finishing" Kit Woodinville, WA (near Seattle) http://kochman.net/N819K


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:02:55 PM PST US
    From: "DLM" <dlm46007@cox.net>
    Subject: Before mounting engine
    yes but have the wiring, cables, etc run through the firewall first _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rob Kochman Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 11:18 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Before mounting engine Thanks, guys... I'm currently planning on borrowing an engine hoist for a few days, mounting the engine, and not taking it off again. Am I kidding myself? Anyone have success with this? -Rob On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Bill Mauledriver Watson <MauleDriver@nc.rr.com> wrote: <MauleDriver@nc.rr.com> I would just comment that while the engine is easy on/off, it isn't with the prop attached. So if you mount the engine (easy), and mount the prop (easy), I strongly suggest removing the prop (easy) before removing the engine (easy. If you do as I did and remove the engine with the prop in place (easy), it's a lot of fun trying put the (##%&#$%@$#%) combination back on. Then you end up removing the prop from the unmounted engine (less than fun) before remounting. Bill "remembering that the HF load leveler should never be used on aircraft engines, HA HA" Watson Rob Kochman wrote: My shiny new Aero Sport engine arrived yesterday. It looks great--I'm almost afraid to touch it. Anyway, I'm following Van's FWF plans and am at the point where it says to actually mount the engine. Is there anything else I should do before that? Seems like access will actually be pretty good after it's mounted. Thanks... -Rob scription, www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List ronics.com/" target="_blank">http://forums.matronics.com Matt Dralle, List Admin. ==== -- Rob Kochman RV-10 "Finishing" Kit Woodinville, WA (near Seattle) http://kochman.net/N819K


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:12:38 PM PST US
    From: <ricksked@cox.net>
    Subject: Re: Before mounting engine
    Hung mine once and didn't have any problems finishing the rest of the aircraft. Rick S. N246RS ---- Rob Kochman <rv10rob@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, guys... I'm currently planning on borrowing an engine hoist for a > few days, mounting the engine, and not taking it off again. Am I kidding > myself? Anyone have success with this? > > -Rob > > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Bill Mauledriver Watson < > MauleDriver@nc.rr.com> wrote: > > > MauleDriver@nc.rr.com> > > > > I would just comment that while the engine is easy on/off, it isn't with > > the prop attached. So if you mount the engine (easy), and mount the prop > > (easy), I strongly suggest removing the prop (easy) before removing the > > engine (easy. > > > > If you do as I did and remove the engine with the prop in place (easy), > > it's a lot of fun trying put the (##%&#$%@$#%) combination back on. Then > > you end up removing the prop from the unmounted engine (less than fun) > > before remounting. > > Bill "remembering that the HF load leveler should never be used on aircraft > > engines, HA HA" Watson > > > > > > Rob Kochman wrote: > > > >> > >> My shiny new Aero Sport engine arrived yesterday. It looks great--I'm > >> almost afraid to touch it. Anyway, I'm following Van's FWF plans and > >> am at the point where it says to actually mount the engine. Is there > >> anything else I should do before that? Seems like access will > >> actually be pretty good after it's mounted. > >> > >> Thanks... > >> > >> -Rob > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Rob Kochman > RV-10 "Finishing" Kit > Woodinville, WA (near Seattle) > http://kochman.net/N819K


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:53:46 PM PST US
    From: Michael Kraus <n223rv@wolflakeairport.net>
    Subject: Re: Before mounting engine
    I mounted the engine 1 time for good and never removed it. Probably want to have the oil cooler mount riveted to the firewall, along with the heater valves installed and sealed (of you want the stainless steel ones, mow is the time to decide!) Also, i'd suggest installing a cooling shroud on the mechanical fuel pump and be sure all the oil line fittings are properly installed on the engine and pointing the correct way. Those are harder to get to after the engine is mounted. -Mike Sent from my iPhone On Apr 8, 2010, at 2:17 PM, Rob Kochman <rv10rob@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, guys... I'm currently planning on borrowing an engine hoist > for a few days, mounting the engine, and not taking it off again. > Am I kidding myself? Anyone have success with this? > > -Rob > > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Bill Mauledriver Watson <MauleDriver@nc.rr.com > > wrote: > > > > I would just comment that while the engine is easy on/off, it isn't > with the prop attached. So if you mount the engine (easy), and > mount the prop (easy), I strongly suggest removing the prop (easy) > before removing the engine (easy. > > If you do as I did and remove the engine with the prop in place > (easy), it's a lot of fun trying put the (##%&#$%@$#%) combination > back on. Then you end up removing the prop from the unmounted > engine (less than fun) before remounting. > Bill "remembering that the HF load leveler should never be used on > aircraft engines, HA HA" Watson > > > Rob Kochman wrote: > > My shiny new Aero Sport engine arrived yesterday. It looks great--I'm > almost afraid to touch it. Anyway, I'm following Van's FWF plans and > am at the point where it says to actually mount the engine. Is there > anything else I should do before that? Seems like access will > actually be pretty good after it's mounted. > > Thanks... > > -Rob > > > scription, > www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > ronics.com/" target="_blank">http://forums.matronics.com > Matt Dralle, List Admin. > ==== > > > -- > Rob Kochman > RV-10 "Finishing" Kit > Woodinville, WA (near Seattle) > http://kochman.net/N819K > >


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:42:12 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Before mounting engine
    From: "johngoodman" <johngoodman@earthlink.net>
    Here's a slightly different engine mount.... -------- #40572 QB. Working on Cowling &amp; Panel N711JG reserved Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=293558#293558 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/rv10ls1_706.jpg


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:09:23 PM PST US
    From: Don McDonald <building_partner@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Before mounting engine
    Also make sure you install the divider inside the oil cooler box before eng ine mounting-and before installing oil cooler. Don --- On Thu, 4/8/10, DLM <dlm46007@cox.net> wrote: From: DLM <dlm46007@cox.net> Subject: RE: RV10-List: Before mounting engine yes but have the wiring, cables, etc -run through the firewall first From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@m atronics.com] On Behalf Of Rob Kochman Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 11:18 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Before mounting engine Thanks, guys... I'm currently planning on borrowing an engine hoist for a f ew days, mounting the engine, and not taking it off again.- Am I kidding myself?- Anyone have success with this? - -Rob On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Bill Mauledriver Watson <MauleDriver@nc.rr .com> wrote: .com> I would just comment that while the engine is easy on/off, it isn't with th e prop attached. -So if you mount the engine (easy), and mount the prop ( easy), I strongly suggest removing the prop (easy) before removing the engi ne (easy. If you do as I did and remove the engine with the prop in place (easy), it' s a lot of fun trying put the (##%&#$%@$#%) combination back on. -Then yo u end up removing the prop from the unmounted engine (less than fun) before remounting. Bill "remembering that the HF load leveler should never be used on aircraft engines, HA HA" Watson Rob Kochman wrote: My shiny new Aero Sport engine arrived yesterday. It looks great--I'm almost afraid to touch it. -Anyway, I'm following Van's FWF plans and am at the point where it says to actually mount the engine. Is there anything else I should do before that? -Seems like access will actually be pretty good after it's mounted. Thanks... -Rob - scription, www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List" target="_blank">http://www.matroni cs.com/Navigator?RV10-List ronics.com/" target="_blank">http://forums.matronics.com Matt Dralle, List Admin. ==== -- Rob Kochman RV-10 "Finishing" Kit Woodinville, WA (near Seattle) http://kochman.net/N819K href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics. com/Navigator?RV10-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c =0A=0A=0A


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:58:37 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Before mounting engine
    From: "Ron B." <cfxoa@klis.com>
    Is a cooling shroud on the mechanical fuel pump standard practice? If so I missed that one. Ron Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=293574#293574


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:00:45 PM PST US
    From: Patrick Pulis <rv10free2fly@yahoo.com.au>
    Subject: To Magento - Or Not To Magento
    I would really appreciate your thoughts regarding the installation of a dua l Plasma III ignition system with crankshaft sensor on the IO-540 engine. - Would this negate the need to install a magneto system?=0A=0AWhat is th e reliability of electronic ignition systems when fitted to aircraft engine s?=0A=0AAdditionally what are the general thoughts regrading the use of 9:1 high compression pistons on IO-540 engines please?=0A=0AYour thoughts woul d be appreciated to enlighten the uninitiated.=0A=0AMany thanks in anticipa tion.=0A=0ARegards=0A=0APatrick Pulis=0AAdelaide, South Australia=0A=0A=0A


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:57:42 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Before mounting engine
    From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2@gmail.com>
    Gee whiz. Where is the fun in that? Remember, the building, and rebuilding, etc. is where it is at. You are supposed to assemble and disassemble every part on the plane at LEAST 3 times, or you can't have done it right! This flying thingy is just a diversion between projects. I can think of several folks on this list that are repeat offenders, and I even know of one RV-10 builder that also built a couple two place RVs and now is working on his second RV-10....and no, it isn't to assist someone or build and sell, as far as I know. I'm sure if an engine hoist can be borrowed once, it can be borrowed again. Or, Pep Boys, HF, etc often have hoists on sale for around $120....less cost than your first flight. On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Michael Kraus <n223rv@wolflakeairport.net> wrote: > I mounted the engine 1 time for good and never removed it.


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:06:40 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: To Magento - Or Not To Magento
    From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2@gmail.com>
    9:00 to one pistons....if you are trying for better economy, perhaps...but I would put a MP limit of perhaps 28" MP if you use them at sea level std or colder conditions. 100LL is going to disappear, we just don't know how quickly. Stock pistons of 8.5 to 1 are certified to run on 91/96 fuel, and most any unleaded avgas replacement will certainly meet that requirement. As to dual electronic.....does it matter whether there is 99% reliability or 99.994% reliability? Do you want to risk that 1% or .006%? Will 2 totally independent electrical systems be 100% reliable? Your choice of what risks you want. Are magnetos 100% reliable? Obviously not or someone would design a cylinder to have a single plug optimally located. Certainly 2 electronic systems are very reliable as long as they both have sufficient electrons to drive the electronics. My question is whether the benefits of a single Plasma III are worth the cost and effort to have 2 different systems. Certainly there is better cruise economy in theory, but no difference at full power. If magneto equipped with Slick Start there should be no difference in starting, so are the cruise benefits worth the trouble and cost? On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Patrick Pulis <rv10free2fly@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > I would really appreciate your thoughts regarding the installation of a dual > Plasma III ignition system with crankshaft sensor on the IO-540 engine. > Would this negate the need to install a magneto system? > > What is the reliability of electronic ignition systems when fitted to > aircraft engines? > > Additionally what are the general thoughts regrading the use of 9:1 high > compression pistons on IO-540 engines please? > > Your thoughts would be appreciated to enlighten the uninitiated. > > Many thanks in anticipation. > > Regards > > Patrick Pulis > Adelaide, South Australia > >


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:13:40 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: To Magento - Or Not To Magento
    From: "orchidman" <gary@wingscc.com>
    I have one and one. Left is an impulse mag powering the bottom plugs. The right is a P III on my IO-540 powering the upper plugs. My 2 cents, I like the split, I feel I am getting most all the advantages of the electronic ignition (single vs dual electronic) and if it were to fail (mechanical or total loss of electrical), the backup of the mag. -------- Gary Blankenbiller RV10 - # 40674 (N2GB Flying) Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=293585#293585


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:31:10 PM PST US
    Subject: windshield brace wiring
    From: "woxofswa" <woxof@aol.com>
    I am just getting ready to final install my canopy top and had a question to run by the brain trust on running wiring through the canopy brace. I have the aerosport overhead console for my A/C installation and I installed wire channel down the length of it which makes it really convenient for getting wires to the back, especially for the a/C unit on an upper tray behind the bulkhead. What I would ideally like to run through the brace are seven 16 gauge wires (two for my overhead light, and the five for the a/c control), an RG coax for the Garmin GPS antenna and wires associated with the Dynon Skyview GPS run. (haven't seen it but heard that there are four or five "thin" wires associated with that. I have notched out the top of my upper forward panel and underlying rib where the brace meets. I think I'll have room, but it will be tight. I would appreciate any comments pro or con to this idea, or any tales of similar runs by someone else. Is there any reason not to do this that I haven't thought of? Thanks in advance. -------- Myron Nelson Mesa, AZ Emp completed, QB wings completed, legacy build fuse in progress Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=293591#293591


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:47:09 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: windshield brace wiring
    From: "AirMike" <Mikeabel@Pacbell.net>
    I have a VOR-coax wire and a low power (20 guage) wire for a vertical card compass running there. Not real critical items and the compass light is almost never used (I do not fly at night). I personally do not like the idea of running the high amperage (16 guage) lines up there. I would worry about chafe at the entry/exit points of the steel tube. If the overhead console is not removable there is no way to inspect for chafe and shorts. -------- OSH '10 or Bust Q/B - phase 1 / painting Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=293592#293592


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:03:58 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: windshield brace wiring
    From: "Jim Berry" <jimberry@qwest.net>
    I ran 2 RG400 coax and @ 2 #18 conductors through the canopy brace with no problem. You can protect the wiring at the ends of the tubng with RTV or SHOE GOO. Jim Berry 40482 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=293595#293595


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:17:26 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: To Magento - Or Not To Magento
    From: "Jim Berry" <jimberry@qwest.net>
    I discussed both of these points at length with Allan Barrett when I was ordering my engine. His take was that 9 : 1 pistons gave a modest increase in performance, with no decrease in reliability or TBO. I wanted to do one mag and one electronic ignition. He was not willing to build an engine with electronic ignition for a variety of reasons, but would delete one mag if I wanted to install an electronic myself. He convinced me to go with 2 mags. Allan, chime in if I have misrepresented you position. Jim Berry 40482 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=293596#293596


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:33:55 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Before mounting engine
    From: "Jim Berry" <jimberry@qwest.net>
    I mounted the engine by myself in about 30 minutes. Just pure luck that when I hoisted it, everything lined up. But once it was on, it looked so cool I never wanted to take it off. The only real hassle was later riveting the forward fuselage section with the engine in place. A few of the rivets through the firewall were a bear to buck behind the mags. Jim Berry 40482 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=293597#293597


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:39:05 PM PST US
    From: Robin Marks <Robin@PaintTheWeb.com>
    Subject: Re: To Magento - Or Not To Magento
    Jim, I purchased the BPE IO-540 with FF Cold Induction and 9:1. I ordered one mag and was going to do the same thing with the hope that PMag would prove out before I flew or go with a Plasma III. At some point along the way I decided to just hang a second mag on and call it good for the first year of flight so I ordered a second mag. I happened to luck out and buy two mags that both required an the AD before first flight. In hind sight I wish I would have installed an electronic ignition on one side strictly for the better burn. I also have come to believe an elec. Ignition may help with part of my temp issues (James Cowl & Plenum; nuff said). YMMV, Robin -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jim Berry Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 9:17 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: To Magento - Or Not To Magento I discussed both of these points at length with Allan Barrett when I was ordering my engine. His take was that 9 : 1 pistons gave a modest increase in performance, with no decrease in reliability or TBO. I wanted to do one mag and one electronic ignition. He was not willing to build an engine with electronic ignition for a variety of reasons, but would delete one mag if I wanted to install an electronic myself. He convinced me to go with 2 mags. Allan, chime in if I have misrepresented you position. Jim Berry 40482 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=293596#293596




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv10-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV10-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv10-list
  • Browse RV10-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --