Today's Message Index:
----------------------
0. 12:10 AM - Just Three Days Left & Some Very Nice Comments... (Matt Dralle)
1. 04:26 AM - Re: Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView (Kelly McMullen)
2. 05:31 AM - Re: Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView (DLM)
3. 05:44 AM - Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView (Lenny Iszak)
4. 07:22 AM - Re: Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView (Kelly McMullen)
5. 07:28 AM - Re: Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView (Robin Marks)
6. 07:49 AM - Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView (Kelly McMullen)
7. 09:14 AM - Re: Interior door handle mechanism ()
8. 09:23 AM - Re: Off Topic--FAA Rulemaking (AirMike)
9. 09:36 AM - Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView (Tim Olson)
10. 09:43 AM - Re: Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView (Tim Olson)
11. 09:45 AM - Re: Re: Off Topic--FAA Rulemaking (Tim Olson)
12. 10:10 AM - Re: Re: Off Topic--FAA Rulemaking (DLM)
13. 01:53 PM - Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView (Kelly McMullen)
14. 05:24 PM - tach drive cover (pilotdds)
15. 05:24 PM - Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView (DLM)
16. 06:07 PM - Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView (Seano)
17. 06:09 PM - Re: tach drive cover (Michael Kraus)
18. 06:10 PM - Re: tach drive cover (Ron B.)
19. 06:10 PM - Re: tach drive cover (Seano)
20. 06:12 PM - Re: Transition Training LODA (Ron B.)
21. 06:15 PM - Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView (Kelly McMullen)
22. 06:39 PM - Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView (Tim Olson)
23. 06:55 PM - Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView (Kelly McMullen)
24. 07:06 PM - Thottle cable length (John Gonzalez)
25. 08:11 PM - Re: tach drive cover (Pascal)
26. 08:37 PM - Re: Thottle cable length (Tim Olson)
27. 09:15 PM - Re: Thottle cable length (John Gonzalez)
Message 0
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Just Three Days Left & Some Very Nice Comments... |
Dear Listers,
There are just three days left in this year's List Fund Raiser. Won't you take
a monment and make a quick Contribution today to support the continued upgrade
and operation of these Forum services.
I've received some more really nice comments from Listers along with their List
Support Contributions, and I've share a few below.
There are some sweet gifts available this year, so browse the selections and pickup
a nice item along with your qualifying Contribution.
Contribution Web Site:
http://www.matronics.com/contribution
Or drop a personal check in the mail to:
Matt Dralle / Matronics
581 Jeannie Way
Livermore CA 94550
USA
Thank you in advance for your generous support! It is very much appreciated!
Best regards,
Matt Dralle
Matronics Email List Administrator
-------------------------------------------------------
Great resource, keep it coming...
Marten V.
Thanks for maintaining these essential lists!
Rumen D.
Great Service!
Douglas D.
Thanks for this great service!
Peter T.
Thanks for your enduring support of homebuilding communications!
Daniel M.
You do a great job and provide a valuable service.
Mark B.
It's really a great source I have used a lot.
Robert K.
Reading the RV-10 list is part of my morning routine...
Perry C.
Great job running these lists.
Edward T.
Thanks for doing a tough job.
Mic T.
Your List was such a great resource for me when I built in "98".
Ron V.
Its a very useful forum.
Dave F.
Really enjoy your list...
William D.
Great service,
Gerald T.
The list still is a valuable source of information and there
are many worthwhile postings.
Graham H.
The list has seen me through an RV-9A, RV-10, and now an RV-12.
Albert G.
Thanks for a great resource!
Barry H.
Thank you for maintaining this excellent site.
Bill W.
The Matronics Email list are an invaluable service.
William C.
I appreciate the RV-10 list.
Vijay P.
Thanks for a great list and all of the work you do.
Ian W.
Thanks for keeping up this very useful list.
George R.
The list is excellent and I find it very handy for any problems
I come up against during construction.
Greg W.
The lists are an important part of my day. I've met lots of people
and made lots of friends.
Dave S.
It's really a great source I haved used a lot.
Robert K.
I read the Pietenpol List everyday.
PF B.
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView |
I would assume that those units could be upgraded to current processor with
liberal application of $$$$. Otherwise it would seem a waste to not be able
to get the weather.
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Lenny Iszak <lenard@rapiddecision.com>wrote:
>
> I just helped a friend connect a NavWorx Box to a pair of AFS 3500 units.
> The only issue is that it only works on the AFS units with an "s"
> processor.
> Older units only support the TIS protocol for traffic and no ADSB weather.
>
> Lenny
>
>
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView |
Freeflight systems will be selling a UAT transceiver in 2Q11 for
slightly more money. This is the experimental version of their TSOed
unit. Street price is rumored to be about $3100. It is the RANGR E
series.
----- Original Message -----
From: Kelly McMullen
To: rv10-list@matronics.com
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 5:22 AM
Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView
I would assume that those units could be upgraded to current processor
with liberal application of $$$$. Otherwise it would seem a waste to not
be able to get the weather.
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Lenny Iszak
<lenard@rapiddecision.com> wrote:
<lenard@rapiddecision.com>
I just helped a friend connect a NavWorx Box to a pair of AFS 3500
units.
The only issue is that it only works on the AFS units with an "s"
processor.
Older units only support the TIS protocol for traffic and no ADSB
weather.
Lenny
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView |
Yeah, they can be upgraded. Not having weather is not that big of a deal. AFS displays
XM weather even with the older processor.
Lenny
[quote="Kelly McMullen"]I would assume that those units could be upgraded to current
processor with liberal application of $$$$. Otherwise it would seem a waste
to not be able to get the weather.
--------
Lenny
#40803
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=321367#321367
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView |
@ $55/mo XM weather consumes a lot of avgas budget. Debate begins as to
how long XM will find it worthwhile to offer the service. The other
question will be how much longer the FAA will require Mode C transponder
if you have UAT. Obviously a non-issue with mode S, but Mode S with
ADS-B In will be significantly more money than UAT In and Out. Only
advantage to Mode S is ability to go above 18,000 legally.
On 11/28/2010 6:42 AM, Lenny Iszak wrote:
> --> RV10-List message posted by: "Lenny Iszak"<lenard@rapiddecision.com>
>
> Yeah, they can be upgraded. Not having weather is not that big of a deal. AFS
displays XM weather even with the older processor.
>
> Lenny
>
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView |
RV10-List: Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView
Isn=92t part of the issue that the ADS-B WX is free and the XM WX is betwee
n
$30-$50/month? The $30/month does not provide some basics like Winds Aloft.
I get confused because NavWorx lists the displays it works with which do no
t
include the G3X but does include the Garmin 696. However the 696 says TIS-A
only. I will be getting TIS from my G330 right?
UGH=85
Robin
*From:* owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:
owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Lenny Iszak
*Sent:* Sunday, November 28, 2010 5:42 AM
*To:* rv10-list@matronics.com
*Subject:* RV10-List: Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView
Yeah, they can be upgraded. Not having weather is not that big of a deal.
AFS displays XM weather even with the older processor.
Lenny
[quote="Kelly McMullen"]I would assume that those units could be upgraded
to
current processor with liberal application of $$$$. Otherwise it would seem
a waste to not be able to get the weather.
--------
Lenny
#40803
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=321367#321367
------------------------------
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView |
As I understand it UAT receives the full package of TIS and FIS (traffic and
weather) on something like 780mHz. 1090ES is an extended version of Mode S
that only receives TISA from ATC facilities that broadcast TIS, and maybe
from other aircraft like airliners that already use 1090. The 1090 band
supports both Mode C transponders and Mode S and therefore is bandwidth
limited and can't handle the extra weather data. The airlines lobbied for
and got a restriction requiring 1090 for flight at and above FL180. So there
is no one solution that does all ADS-B that is allowed in all airspace.
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Jesse Saint <jesse@saintaviation.com>wrote:
>
> I just wanted to post a quick description of my experience installing a
> NavWorx ADS600-B Transceiver coupled to a Dynon SkyView system.
>
>
> Bill at NavWorx is fairly good to deal with. I don't fully understand the
> difference between 1090 and UAT (those may not even be the two systems, or
> they may be the same). I think Bill said that the UAT system that the
> NavWorx system works on is better than 1090. Anyway, there didn't seem to
> be any other options that were reasonably prices, so NavWorx it is.
>
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Interior door handle mechanism |
Geoff: Put me on the list for the new handles when they are ready. Jay Rowe #40301
jfrjr@roadrunner.com
---- "g.combs" <g.combs@aerosportmodeling.com> wrote:
> Myron these will be available very soon from Aerosport Products. They are a
> 30 minute install to any stock RV-10 door handle. They will come with gear
> box cover as seen
> in the photo.
>
> Geoff
> www.aerosportproducts.com
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "woxofswa" <woxof@aol.com>
> To: <rv10-list@matronics.com>
> Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2010 3:29 PM
> Subject: RV10-List: Interior door handle mechanism
>
>
> >
> > Anybody know of aftermarket interior door handles that don't look like
> > they belong on a soap box derby car?
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > --------
> > Myron Nelson
> > Mesa, AZ
> > Emp completed, QB wings completed, legacy build fuse in mostly done,
> > finishing kit in progress.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Read this topic online here:
> >
> > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=321222#321222
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
Message 8
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Off Topic--FAA Rulemaking |
Dave - thanks for letting us know about this - I sent the following to the FAA.
I object to the actively engaged provisions of this clarifying definition. While
I fly an experimental aircraft and do my own inspections, I formerly owned a
certified aircraft and may again in the future. This proposal (if implemented)
would make it more difficult and expensive to obtain an IA sign-off on an annual
inspection. Many retired or semi-retired IA's can do a very competent job
of "annualing" a certified aircraft. To summarily kick these people out of the
aviation community by pulling their authorization would be doing aviation a
great disservice. I see no safety benefit in this proposal.
--------
See you OSH '11
Q/B - flying 1 yr+
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=321401#321401
Message 9
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView |
A couple of points:
The UAT frequency is 978mhz.
If you DO decide to go 1090ES, it requires a capable transponder.....today t
hat would mean you probably don't want to buy a gtx327 because it's the gtx3
30 you would be able to upgrade...at a price of about $1200 I think. This w
ould give you OUT but not IN, so you still would only get Mode S traffic in l
imited coverage areas. Also no WX.
While sometimes people make 1090ES sound like a better choice citing the hig
h altitude requirement for 1090ES, I personally have found that ops over 18,
000' in the RV10 aren't a very practical thing....likely you'll never bother
to go that high...ever. Yes, people have, like Jesse, and cruising at 17k w
orks well for him, but that isn't >18k'. You will find the RV10 so performa
nce limited above 18 that you won't go there....or if you did, you'd probabl
y want to be solo or 2 people-no-baggage. So the altitude limitations on UA
T use fit nicely with the RV10's useful profile.
The WX is provided by the same source as WSI. XM and WSI both offer package
s with more services than FIS-B with better continental coverage than FIS-B w
ill ever offer. So, FIS-B is great for those who don't care or use it enoug
h or want to spend the money on a premium satellite service that gives much b
etter in-flight performance. Normally I would think that since WSI's servic
e provides the FIS-B weather for the ADS-B program, that WSI would be the mo
re "stable" company, but XM has such a huge market share that both seem to b
e able to stick around just fine. I doubt XM is going anywhere.
One more thing... If you go 1090, best to wait or go with a non-garmin trans
ponder that offers in/out with the transponder. The upgraded 330 with 1090E
S only does out. So, no traffic services for you. With the UAT you get bas
ically all transponder equipped traffic if you're in ground coverage. If no
t, you still get air-to-air coverage even if not in ground station coverage.
Make sure to go with the transformer not receiver only, if you want it to w
ork great for you with the way the system is being run today.
So really, the UAT type ADS-B is a near perfect fit for the RV-10. 1090ES o
ffers us much less. Even TCAS offers less as a whole. (it's better traffic c
overage without any weather capabilities.) The near ideal for us is like Se
an is planning...a TCAS+ADS-B mixed type system...but you have to pony up fo
r it.
Tim
On Nov 28, 2010, at 9:46 AM, Kelly McMullen <apilot2@gmail.com> wrote:
> As I understand it UAT receives the full package of TIS and FIS (traffic a
nd weather) on something like 780mHz. 1090ES is an extended version of Mode S
that only receives TISA from ATC facilities that broadcast TIS, and maybe f
rom other aircraft like airliners that already use 1090. The 1090 band suppo
rts both Mode C transponders and Mode S and therefore is bandwidth limited a
nd can't handle the extra weather data. The airlines lobbied for and got a r
estriction requiring 1090 for flight at and above FL180. So there is no one s
olution that does all ADS-B that is allowed in all airspace.
>
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Jesse Saint <jesse@saintaviation.com> wro
te:
>
> I just wanted to post a quick description of my experience installing a Na
vWorx ADS600-B Transceiver coupled to a Dynon SkyView system.
>
>
> Bill at NavWorx is fairly good to deal with. I don't fully understand the
difference between 1090 and UAT (those may not even be the two systems, or t
hey may be the same). I think Bill said that the UAT system that the NavWor
x system works on is better than 1090. Anyway, there didn't seem to be any o
ther options that were reasonably prices, so NavWorx it is.
>
>
>
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
Message 10
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView |
I think the G3X is too new for it to be tested and known. Likely it'll do t
raffic just like the 696. The WX would be much harder, since to do that, th
ey'd have to emulate XM as a split separate feed....not sure if they'll go d
own that path. For systems that support a combined ADS-B interface where yo
u get both on the same feed, maybe someday they'll integrate...but if you go
Garmin on EFIS/panel as a base, you're likely to be stuck at least for a lo
ng while, with Garmin only for accessories of this type. The gorilla doesn'
t play well with all the other monkey species.
Tim
On Nov 28, 2010, at 9:25 AM, Robin Marks <Robin@PaintTheWeb.com> wrote:
> Isn=99t part of the issue that the ADS-B WX is free and the XM WX is
between $30-$50/month? The $30/month does not provide some basics like Wind
s Aloft.
>
> I get confused because NavWorx lists the displays it works with which do n
ot include the G3X but does include the Garmin 696. However the 696 says TIS
-A only. I will be getting TIS from my G330 right?
>
> UGH
>
>
>
> Robin
>
>
>
> From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@
matronics.com] On Behalf Of Lenny Iszak
> Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 5:42 AM
> To: rv10-list@matronics.com
> Subject: RV10-List: Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView
>
>
>
>
> Yeah, they can be upgraded. Not having weather is not that big of a deal. A
FS displays XM weather even with the older processor.
>
> Lenny
>
>
> [quote="Kelly McMullen"]I would assume that those units could be upgrade
d to current processor with liberal application of $$$$. Otherwise it would s
eem a waste to not be able to get the weather.
>
> --------
> Lenny
> #40803
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=321367#321367
>
> .aeroelectric.com">www.aeroelectric.com
> -Matt Dralle, List Admin.
> iption,
> //www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigato
r?RV10-List
> ttp://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
> =============
>
>
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1170 /
>
>
>
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
Message 11
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Off Topic--FAA Rulemaking |
Short and sweet and to the point. I'll copy what you said and sent in the same.
Tim
On Nov 28, 2010, at 11:20 AM, "AirMike" <Mikeabel@Pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> Dave - thanks for letting us know about this - I sent the following to the FAA.
>
> I object to the actively engaged provisions of this clarifying definition. While
I fly an experimental aircraft and do my own inspections, I formerly owned
a certified aircraft and may again in the future. This proposal (if implemented)
would make it more difficult and expensive to obtain an IA sign-off on an
annual inspection. Many retired or semi-retired IA's can do a very competent job
of "annualing" a certified aircraft. To summarily kick these people out of
the aviation community by pulling their authorization would be doing aviation
a great disservice. I see no safety benefit in this proposal.
>
> --------
> See you OSH '11
> Q/B - flying 1 yr+
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=321401#321401
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 12
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Off Topic--FAA Rulemaking |
BTW if you want to object to something ; object to the 99 year comment
period assigned to the eliminaton of the 3rd class medical.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Olson" <Tim@myrv10.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Off Topic--FAA Rulemaking
>
> Short and sweet and to the point. I'll copy what you said and sent in the
> same.
> Tim
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2010, at 11:20 AM, "AirMike" <Mikeabel@Pacbell.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> Dave - thanks for letting us know about this - I sent the following to
>> the FAA.
>>
>> I object to the actively engaged provisions of this clarifying
>> definition. While I fly an experimental aircraft and do my own
>> inspections, I formerly owned a certified aircraft and may again in the
>> future. This proposal (if implemented) would make it more difficult and
>> expensive to obtain an IA sign-off on an annual inspection. Many retired
>> or semi-retired IA's can do a very competent job of "annualing" a
>> certified aircraft. To summarily kick these people out of the aviation
>> community by pulling their authorization would be doing aviation a great
>> disservice. I see no safety benefit in this proposal.
>>
>> --------
>> See you OSH '11
>> Q/B - flying 1 yr+
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Read this topic online here:
>>
>> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=321401#321401
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Message 13
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView |
Thanks for the frequency correction Tim. Memory isn't what it used to
be. :-(
Note that a GNX330 is something like $3300 to start with, and the
upgrade is on top of that, you you would be out almost $2K more than the
NavWorx UAT transceiver. If you want really big bucks there is the
Garmin UAT, the GDL 90, which AFAIK there have been no announcements
whether it will be upgradeable to comply with the final rule. If you
were to buy a 1090ES of any brand, you would still need a UAT receiver
to get weather, as 1090 doesn't have the bandwidth available to carry it
ontop of existing transponder traffic. Or stick with XM weather and keep
paying the fee.
On 11/28/2010 10:33 AM, Tim Olson wrote:
> A couple of points:
> The UAT frequency is 978mhz.
> If you DO decide to go 1090ES, it requires a capable
> transponder.....today that would mean you probably don't want to buy a
> gtx327 because it's the gtx330 you would be able to upgrade...at a
> price of about $1200 I think. This would give you OUT but not IN, so
> you still would only get Mode S traffic in limited coverage areas.
> Also no WX.
>
> **
Message 14
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | tach drive cover |
Anybody know where to find a cover for the tach drive on the lycoming engin
es.Also how about 5/8 or 3/4
blast tubes that can be riveted to the engine baffling-thanks
Message 15
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView |
check http://freeflightsystems.com/docs/FreeFlight_RANGR_ADS-B.pdf
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kelly McMullen" <kellym@aviating.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 2:50 PM
Subject: Re: RV10-List: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView
>
> Thanks for the frequency correction Tim. Memory isn't what it used to
> be. :-(
> Note that a GNX330 is something like $3300 to start with, and the
> upgrade is on top of that, you you would be out almost $2K more than the
> NavWorx UAT transceiver. If you want really big bucks there is the
> Garmin UAT, the GDL 90, which AFAIK there have been no announcements
> whether it will be upgradeable to comply with the final rule. If you
> were to buy a 1090ES of any brand, you would still need a UAT receiver
> to get weather, as 1090 doesn't have the bandwidth available to carry it
> ontop of existing transponder traffic. Or stick with XM weather and keep
> paying the fee.
>
>
> On 11/28/2010 10:33 AM, Tim Olson wrote:
>> A couple of points:
>> The UAT frequency is 978mhz.
>> If you DO decide to go 1090ES, it requires a capable
>> transponder.....today that would mean you probably don't want to buy a
>> gtx327 because it's the gtx330 you would be able to upgrade...at a
>> price of about $1200 I think. This would give you OUT but not IN, so
>> you still would only get Mode S traffic in limited coverage areas.
>> Also no WX.
>>
>> **
>
>
>
>
Message 16
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView |
My gts800 has the in portion and the gtx330 (es) is the out. If I recall the gtx330
was around 4200$
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 28, 2010, at 14:50, Kelly McMullen <kellym@aviating.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the frequency correction Tim. Memory isn't what it used to be. :-(
> Note that a GNX330 is something like $3300 to start with, and the upgrade is
on top of that, you you would be out almost $2K more than the NavWorx UAT transceiver.
If you want really big bucks there is the Garmin UAT, the GDL 90, which
AFAIK there have been no announcements whether it will be upgradeable to comply
with the final rule. If you were to buy a 1090ES of any brand, you would
still need a UAT receiver to get weather, as 1090 doesn't have the bandwidth available
to carry it ontop of existing transponder traffic. Or stick with XM weather
and keep paying the fee.
>
>
> On 11/28/2010 10:33 AM, Tim Olson wrote:
>> A couple of points:
>> The UAT frequency is 978mhz.
>> If you DO decide to go 1090ES, it requires a capable transponder.....today that
would mean you probably don't want to buy a gtx327 because it's the gtx330
you would be able to upgrade...at a price of about $1200 I think. This would
give you OUT but not IN, so you still would only get Mode S traffic in limited
coverage areas. Also no WX.
>>
>> **
>
>
>
>
Message 17
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: tach drive cover |
http://www.averytools.com/prodinfo.asp?number=6346
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 28, 2010, at 8:19 PM, pilotdds <pilotdds@aol.com> wrote:
> Anybody know where to find a cover for the tach drive on the lycoming engi
nes.Also how about 5/8 or 3/4
> blast tubes that can be riveted to the engine baffling-thanks
>
>
>
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
Message 18
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: tach drive cover |
Aircraft Spruce, P/N 10-06754. As for blast tube flanges, I machined my own out
of alum. stock. If you are not capable, any shop with a lathe should should do.
Ron
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=321459#321459
Message 19
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: tach drive cover |
Andair sells one on aircraft spruce. Expensive though.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 28, 2010, at 18:19, pilotdds <pilotdds@aol.com> wrote:
> Anybody know where to find a cover for the tach drive on the lycoming engi
nes.Also how about 5/8 or 3/4
> blast tubes that can be riveted to the engine baffling-thanks
>
>
>
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
Message 20
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Transition Training LODA |
We did our transition training last June with Joe. All three of us were very pleased
with his abilities. Five stars with us, thanks Joe and happy holidays.
Ron
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=321462#321462
Message 21
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView |
That looks very attractive, and the experimental version is very
competitively priced at $2495.
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 6:17 PM, DLM <dlm46007@cox.net> wrote:
>
> check http://freeflightsystems.com/docs/FreeFlight_RANGR_ADS-B.pdf
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kelly McMullen" <kellym@aviating.com>
>
Message 22
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView |
Wouldn't you want the GPS equipped version though, for $3495?
I don't know the capabilities of that unit, but I do know that
for most systems you'll either need to have one with internal
GPS or you'll need to send it GPS from a panel-mount
GNS430W/480/530W. Again, I don't have the details, but I'd
think if you had the right panel hardware, you could go with
the $2495 version, but the $3495 would probably work stand-alone.
I know very little about their product to date. The NavWorx
ADS600B though has an internal GPS, priced in the neighborhood
of the one without GPS from Freeflight.
Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD
On 11/28/2010 8:12 PM, Kelly McMullen wrote:
>
> That looks very attractive, and the experimental version is very
> competitively priced at $2495.
>
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 6:17 PM, DLM <dlm46007@cox.net
> <mailto:dlm46007@cox.net>> wrote:
>
> <mailto:dlm46007@cox.net>>
>
> check http://freeflightsystems.com/docs/FreeFlight_RANGR_ADS-B.pdf
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kelly McMullen"
> <kellym@aviating.com <mailto:kellym@aviating.com>>
>
Message 23
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: NavWorx ADS-B on Dynon SkyView |
I'd rather do a little extra wiring to connect it to a 430/530/480. I
expect to have a VFR backup with EFIS, and 2 GPS antennas are enough. But
then again, might be easier to do the tail cone install with GPS ant on top
and transponder on bottom.
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Tim Olson <Tim@myrv10.com> wrote:
>
>
> Wouldn't you want the GPS equipped version though, for $3495?
> I don't know the capabilities of that unit, but I do know that
> for most systems you'll either need to have one with internal
> GPS or you'll need to send it GPS from a panel-mount
> GNS430W/480/530W. Again, I don't have the details, but I'd
> think if you had the right panel hardware, you could go with
> the $2495 version, but the $3495 would probably work stand-alone.
> I know very little about their product to date. The NavWorx
> ADS600B though has an internal GPS, priced in the neighborhood
> of the one without GPS from Freeflight.
>
>
Message 24
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Thottle cable length |
I spent most of the day hooking up my control cables on the engine.
I was very surprised that the cables Vans provided with the kit were so tig
ht and left little extra length to work with. I had installed eye ball pass
throughs on my firewall in the same location as the stock SBs=2C But I had
to drill out the aluminum cores so that the cables would fit through corre
ctly. Unfortunely=2C I hadn't drilled the holes large enough and once the f
ittings where screwed down the cables were tight in the core. Hense=2C I ne
eded to undo the eye balls so I could pull the cables tighter giving more r
oom in the cable in the engine compartment. Even with that=2C I have no wig
gle room.
I was also very careful to keep the location of the cable handles in the sa
me location as the stock part even though I fabicated a different subpanel
which holds all the control handles.
My mixture cable works through its full range of motion=2C but my throttle
cable seems short by 1/4-3/8" even though the cable bracket on the throttle
body is midway up the throttle cable threaded base.
Did other builders need to adjust double articulated arm on the throttle bo
dy so that the cable will make the throttle go to both stops- full open and
full closed?
Thanks=2C
JOhn G #409
Message 25
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: tach drive cover |
Mine was provided by America's Engine when I asked the question.
I used the tubes at HD that can be located in the plumbing department0
basic irrigation tubes. Same thing I used for the wiring too.
Pascal
From: pilotdds
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 5:19 PM
Subject: RV10-List: tach drive cover
Anybody know where to find a cover for the tach drive on the lycoming
engines.Also how about 5/8 or 3/4
blast tubes that can be riveted to the engine baffling-thanks
Message 26
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Thottle cable length |
John, is this what you're speaking of?
http://www.myrv10.com/N104CD/finishing/20051228/index.html
See down the page on throttle cable.
Tim
On Nov 28, 2010, at 9:03 PM, John Gonzalez <indigoonlatigo@msn.com> wrote:
> I spent most of the day hooking up my control cables on the engine.
>
> I was very surprised that the cables Vans provided with the kit were so ti
ght and left little extra length to work with. I had installed eye ball pass
throughs on my firewall in the same location as the stock SBs, But I had to
drill out the aluminum cores so that the cables would fit through correctly
. Unfortunely, I hadn't drilled the holes large enough and once the fittings
where screwed down the cables were tight in the core. Hense, I needed to un
do the eye balls so I could pull the cables tighter giving more room in the c
able in the engine compartment. Even with that, I have no wiggle room.
>
> I was also very careful to keep the location of the cable handles in the s
ame location as the stock part even though I fabicated a different subpanel w
hich holds all the control handles.
>
> My mixture cable works through its full range of motion, but my throttle c
able seems short by 1/4-3/8" even though the cable bracket on the throttle b
ody is midway up the throttle cable threaded base.
>
> Did other builders need to adjust double articulated arm on the throttle b
ody so that the cable will make the throttle go to both stops- full open and
full closed?
>
> Thanks,
>
> JOhn G #409
>
>
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
Message 27
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Thottle cable length |
This what I am referring to=2C but you added a quadrant which must have mad
e the length requirement change. I kept everything nearly the same and ran
out of cable length.
I believe I will be able to fix this by adjusting the position of the servo
arm as it can imcrementally articulate with the arm which hits the stops.
Just trying the figure why I ran out of length and whether others have had
the problem.
Thank you for directing me to the exact location on your site.
John
From: Tim@myrv10.com
Subject: Re: RV10-List: Thottle cable length
John=2C is this what you're speaking of?
http://www.myrv10.com/N104CD/finishing/20051228/index.html
See down the page on throttle cable.
Tim
On Nov 28=2C 2010=2C at 9:03 PM=2C John Gonzalez <indigoonlatigo@msn.com> w
rote:
I spent most of the day hooking up my control cables on the engine.
I was very surprised that the cables Vans provided with the kit were so tig
ht and left little extra length to work with. I had installed eye ball pass
throughs on my firewall in the same location as the stock SBs=2C But I had
to drill out the aluminum cores so that the cables would fit through corre
ctly. Unfortunely=2C I hadn't drilled the holes large enough and once the f
ittings where screwed down the cables were tight in the core. Hense=2C I ne
eded to undo the eye balls so I could pull the cables tighter giving more r
oom in the cable in the engine compartment. Even with that=2C I have no wig
gle room.
I was also very careful to keep the location of the cable handles in the sa
me location as the stock part even though I fabicated a different subpanel
which holds all the control handles.
My mixture cable works through its full range of motion=2C but my throttle
cable seems short by 1/4-3/8" even though the cable bracket on the throttle
body is midway up the throttle cable threaded base.
Did other builders need to adjust double articulated arm on the throttle bo
dy so that the cable will make the throttle go to both stops- full open and
full closed?
Thanks=2C
JOhn G #409
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|