Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 07:11 AM - Winter oil, revisited (Dawson-Townsend,Timothy)
2. 07:34 AM - Re: Winter oil, revisited (Alan Meklet Md)
3. 07:57 AM - Re: Winter oil, revisited (Tim Olson)
4. 10:11 AM - Lower Wing Root Fairing (F-1099B) question (jchang10)
5. 10:35 AM - Re: Lower Wing Root Fairing (F-1099B) question (Michael Kraus)
6. 10:35 AM - Re: Lower Wing Root Fairing (F-1099B) question (Pascal)
7. 11:00 AM - Re: Lower Wing Root Fairing (F-1099B) question (DLM)
8. 12:32 PM - Re: Lower Wing Root Fairing (F-1099B) question (Pascal)
9. 01:15 PM - Re: Lower Wing Root Fairing (F-1099B) question (jchang10)
10. 01:31 PM - Re: Lower Wing Root Fairing (F-1099B) question (Robin Marks)
11. 04:04 PM - Flightline interior w/ alternative door seals (Rob Kochman)
12. 04:21 PM - Re: Flightline interior w/ alternative door seals (Rob Kochman)
13. 06:41 PM - Re: Flightline interior w/ alternative door seals (Eric_Kallio)
14. 07:15 PM - Re: Flightline interior w/ alternative door seals (Ron B.)
15. 07:46 PM - Re: Thottle cable length (ivankris)
16. 08:34 PM - Re: Re: Thottle cable length (Kelly McMullen)
17. 08:58 PM - Re: Re: Thottle cable length (pilotdds)
18. 11:04 PM - Propeller exchange? (Dick & Vicki Sipp)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Winter oil, revisited |
Checked with the local mechanic, and he said:
"You probably want that oil gone sooner rather than later. I agree though
that with good preheat and letting the oil get good and warm before flight
then you probably won't have any problems. Watch the oil temperature - if
the thick oil congeals in the oil cooler then the cooler becomes essentiall
y blocked - the oil temperature will go way up quickly since there is no oi
l cooling."
TDT
Tim Dawson-Townsend
RV-10 N52KS (http://aprs.fi/?call=n52ks)
tdt@aurora.aero<mailto:tdt@aurora.aero>
617-500-4812 (office)
617-905-4800 (mobile)
smaller flight
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Winter oil, revisited |
I think you should get rid of the mineral oil. I switched over at 40 hours.
Regards,
Alan
Ps if you want to fly up to klci there is a good restaurant
Sent from my iPod
On Dec 1, 2010, at 10:07 AM, "Dawson-Townsend,Timothy" <tdawson-townsend@aur
ora.aero> wrote:
> Checked with the local mechanic, and he said:
>
>
>
> =9CYou probably want that oil gone sooner rather than later. I agre
e though that with good preheat and letting the oil get good and warm before
flight then you probably won't have any problems. Watch the oil temperatur
e - if the thick oil congeals in the oil cooler then the cooler becomes esse
ntially blocked - the oil temperature will go way up quickly since there is n
o oil cooling.=9D
>
>
>
> TDT
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Tim Dawson-Townsend
>
> RV-10 N52KS (http://aprs.fi/?call=n52ks)
>
> tdt@aurora.aero
>
> 617-500-4812 (office)
>
> 617-905-4800 (mobile)
>
> <image001.png>
>
>
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Winter oil, revisited |
I know I was recommended to go 50 hours on mineral based oil.
I agree with Kelly, if you switch to Philips 20-50 X/C right
now, you would be well served....you get to stay on mineral
a while longer, maybe help your break-in, and get a fresh
oil change.
The other option is to get out there and FLY 10 more hours,
and get to 50....then do the oil change. If you go out and
play for a while, you can finish the break-in and use that
same oil.
Now, if you don't want to fly a lot, do like Kelly also said,
and put in some fresh oil that won't be loaded with corrosives,
and add some camguard. You don't want to leave it sit for
a long time either way, but especially if it has old oil.
The Camguard additive is actually proving to honestly
add corrosion resistance too, so go with that at least
in the months the plane doesn't fly a ton.
I used Philips x/c 20-50 for the first 100 hours before
switching to semi-synthetic (I use Exxon Elite, but
according to Aviation Consumer's testing, the best
value is Philips X/C + Camguard).
Tim
On 12/1/2010 9:31 AM, Alan Meklet Md wrote:
> I think you should get rid of the mineral oil. I switched over at 40 hours.
> Regards,
> Alan
> Ps if you want to fly up to klci there is a good restaurant
>
>
> Sent from my iPod
>
> On Dec 1, 2010, at 10:07 AM, "Dawson-Townsend,Timothy"
> <tdawson-townsend@aurora.aero <mailto:tdawson-townsend@aurora.aero>> wrote:
>
>> Checked with the local mechanic, and he said:
>>
>> You probably want that oil gone sooner rather than later. I agree
>> though that with good preheat and letting the oil get good and warm
>> before flight then you probably won't have any problems. Watch the oil
>> temperature - if the thick oil congeals in the oil cooler then the
>> cooler becomes essentially blocked - the oil temperature will go way
>> up quickly since there is no oil cooling.
>>
>> TDT
>>
>> Tim Dawson-Townsend
>>
>> RV-10 N52KS (<http://aprs.fi/?call=n52ks>http://aprs.fi/?call=n52ks)
>>
>> <mailto:tdt@aurora.aero>tdt@aurora.aero <mailto:tdt@aurora.aero>
>>
>> 617-500-4812 (office)
>>
>> 617-905-4800 (mobile)
>>
>> <image001.png>
>>
> *
>
> *
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Lower Wing Root Fairing (F-1099B) question |
On page 44-6, the lower wing root fairing (F-1099B) is shown bent around the leading
edge.
My stock part came with no bend. Curious if it should have had a factory bend in
it or no?
Otherwise, I assume, we need to match the contour of the leading edge.
Thanks,
Jae
40533
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=321937#321937
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Lower Wing Root Fairing (F-1099B) question |
No bend, you are correct.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 1, 2010, at 1:08 PM, "jchang10" <jc-matronics_rv10@jline.com> wrote:
>
> On page 44-6, the lower wing root fairing (F-1099B) is shown bent around the
leading edge.
>
> My stock part came with no bend. Curious if it should have had a factory bend
in it or no?
>
> Otherwise, I assume, we need to match the contour of the leading edge.
>
> Thanks,
> Jae
> 40533
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=321937#321937
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Lower Wing Root Fairing (F-1099B) question |
assumption is correct, you custom fit the leading edge to your wing.
Pascal
--------------------------------------------------
From: "jchang10" <jc-matronics_rv10@jline.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 10:08 AM
Subject: RV10-List: Lower Wing Root Fairing (F-1099B) question
>
> On page 44-6, the lower wing root fairing (F-1099B) is shown bent around
> the leading edge.
>
> My stock part came with no bend. Curious if it should have had a factory
> bend in it or no?
>
> Otherwise, I assume, we need to match the contour of the leading edge.
>
> Thanks,
> Jae
> 40533
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=321937#321937
>
>
>
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Lower Wing Root Fairing (F-1099B) question |
You can also add an extra nutplate on the lower forward area on a stationary
piece there that does not call for a nutplate in the plans.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pascal" <rv10builder@verizon.net>
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 11:33 AM
Subject: Re: RV10-List: Lower Wing Root Fairing (F-1099B) question
>
> assumption is correct, you custom fit the leading edge to your wing.
> Pascal
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "jchang10" <jc-matronics_rv10@jline.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 10:08 AM
> To: <rv10-list@matronics.com>
> Subject: RV10-List: Lower Wing Root Fairing (F-1099B) question
>
>>
>> On page 44-6, the lower wing root fairing (F-1099B) is shown bent around
>> the leading edge.
>>
>> My stock part came with no bend. Curious if it should have had a factory
>> bend in it or no?
>>
>> Otherwise, I assume, we need to match the contour of the leading edge.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jae
>> 40533
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Read this topic online here:
>>
>> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=321937#321937
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Message 8
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Lower Wing Root Fairing (F-1099B) question |
specifically 1099-G. Just realized I did it without even thinking about the
plans not calling for it. It simply made for a better fit so I just did it
without thinking about it.
No big deal, I guess if not done.
Pascal
--------------------------------------------------
From: "DLM" <dlm46007@cox.net>
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: RV10-List: Lower Wing Root Fairing (F-1099B) question
>
> You can also add an extra nutplate on the lower forward area on a
> stationary piece there that does not call for a nutplate in the plans.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pascal" <rv10builder@verizon.net>
> To: <rv10-list@matronics.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 11:33 AM
> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Lower Wing Root Fairing (F-1099B) question
>
>
>>
>> assumption is correct, you custom fit the leading edge to your wing.
>> Pascal
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "jchang10" <jc-matronics_rv10@jline.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 10:08 AM
>> To: <rv10-list@matronics.com>
>> Subject: RV10-List: Lower Wing Root Fairing (F-1099B) question
>>
>>> <jc-matronics_rv10@jline.com>
>>>
>>> On page 44-6, the lower wing root fairing (F-1099B) is shown bent around
>>> the leading edge.
>>>
>>> My stock part came with no bend. Curious if it should have had a factory
>>> bend in it or no?
>>>
>>> Otherwise, I assume, we need to match the contour of the leading edge.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jae
>>> 40533
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Read this topic online here:
>>>
>>> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=321937#321937
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Message 9
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Lower Wing Root Fairing (F-1099B) question |
Thanks everyone for the advice. Now, i see on page 44-2, the last step, where it
asks you to conform to the shape of the leading edge. I need to read more carefully!
argh.
Jae
40533
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=321956#321956
Message 10
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Lower Wing Root Fairing (F-1099B) question |
Re: RV10-List: Lower Wing Root Fairing (F-1099B) question
Almost everything I do, I do without thinking about it.
Robin
Do Not Archive
*From:* owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:
owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Pascal
*Sent:* Wednesday, December 01, 2010 12:28 PM
*To:* rv10-list@matronics.com
*Subject:* Re: RV10-List: Lower Wing Root Fairing (F-1099B) question
specifically 1099-G. Just realized I did it without even thinking about the
plans not calling for it. It simply made for a better fit so I just did it
without thinking about it.
No big deal, I guess if not done.
Pascal
--------------------------------------------------
From: "DLM" <dlm46007@cox.net>
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: RV10-List: Lower Wing Root Fairing (F-1099B) question
>
> You can also add an extra nutplate on the lower forward area on a
> stationary piece there that does not call for a nutplate in the plans.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pascal" <rv10builder@verizon.net>
> To: <rv10-list@matronics.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 11:33 AM
> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Lower Wing Root Fairing (F-1099B) question
>
>
>>
>> assumption is correct, you custom fit the leading edge to your wing.
>> Pascal
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "jchang10" <jc-matronics_rv10@jline.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 10:08 AM
>> To: <rv10-list@matronics.com>
>> Subject: RV10-List: Lower Wing Root Fairing (F-1099B) question
>>
>>> <jc-matronics_rv10@jline.com>
>>>
>>> On page 44-6, the lower wing root fairing (F-1099B) is shown bent around
>>> the leading edge.
>>>
>>> My stock part came with no bend. Curious if it should have had a factory
>>> bend in it or no?
>>>
>>> Otherwise, I assume, we need to match the contour of the leading edge.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jae
>>> 40533
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Read this topic online here:
>>>
>>> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=321937#321937
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
------------------------------
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Message 11
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Flightline interior w/ alternative door seals |
Hi, all... I=92m using a Flightline interior and foam door seals that attac
h
to the door, and I=92m planning on putting that seal where the door interio
r
transitions to paint (see attached drawing). Has anyone done anything
similar and have any guidance (or pictures)? I figure the foam seal will
mask the transition between the interior fabric and the painted door edge.
Thanks=85
-Rob
--
Rob Kochman
RV-10 "Finishing" Kit
Woodinville, WA (near Seattle)
http://kochman.net/N819K
Message 12
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Flightline interior w/ alternative door seals |
I meant to label the picture--blue is the interior, red is the paint, and
green is the door seal.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Rob Kochman <rv10rob@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, all... I=92m using a Flightline interior and foam door seals that att
ach
> to the door, and I=92m planning on putting that seal where the door inter
ior
> transitions to paint (see attached drawing). Has anyone done anything
> similar and have any guidance (or pictures)? I figure the foam seal will
> mask the transition between the interior fabric and the painted door edge
.
>
>
> Thanks=85
>
>
> -Rob
>
>
> --
> Rob Kochman
> RV-10 "Finishing" Kit
> Woodinville, WA (near Seattle)
> http://kochman.net/N819K
>
--
Rob Kochman
RV-10 "Finishing" Kit
Woodinville, WA (near Seattle)
http://kochman.net/N819K
Message 13
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Flightline interior w/ alternative door seals |
I recently installed my interior from Abby. Her plans have you wrap the interior
fabric around the edge and glue it down to the 1/2 inch vertical lip if that
makes sense. I thought I had a picture but I can't find it right now and I won't
be back to the hanger until Saturday. Having said that though I don't see
a reason why you couldn't terminate your fabric under your door seal and paint
the edges. In fact it will probably give you a cleaner look. Bottom line, although
her plans are different you should be fine with what you are planning as
long as you are accounting for the additional thickness in fitting the doors
and the trimming of your canopy lip.
Eric Kallio
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=322011#322011
Message 14
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Flightline interior w/ alternative door seals |
Have you thought of using the McMaster-Carr seal? That is what we used thanks to
others before us and are very pleased with it.
Ron
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=322013#322013
Message 15
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Thottle cable length |
All three cables were too short in my installation. I returned all three to Vans
for credit and then re-ordered the 50.5" throttle cable from Vans which is 3"
longer than the one they ship with the kit.
I then ordered two new cables (Mix & Prop) directly from the Mfg. and specified
the length I wanted. They are a bit pricey (about twice Vans prices) that way
but well worth the extra money to get the proper length for proper routing.
The Mfg. is ACS Products. This company was started by the same man who started
Aircraft Spruce and was originally part of that company but is now a separate
entity.
These are the part numbers:
Blue Knob VProp A-1760-30-0745-V with 2.5" stroke
Red Knob Mixture A-1760-20-0535-V with 2.5" stroke
This is a special non refundable order at $159.95 each so be sure that this is
what you need. The part numbers I have given here gives you cables two inches
longer than the cables you get from Vans, this is what I used and they worked
fine. If I had to do it again I believe I would, like the throttle cable, make
them 3 inches longer which would make the installation even easier.
If you plan a std Vans panel order them 2" longer. If you use CF panel from Aerosport
Products order them 3" longer.
To order cables three inches longer change the last number for the blue knob from
0745 to 0755 (75.5") and for the red knob from 0535 to 0545 (54.5")
Keep in mind that if you plan on using the CF instrument panel from http://www.aerosportproducts.com/ then this brings the attach point of these cables in the cockpit back almost one inch which makes longer cables a definite requirement.
To order call Anthony Garcia at Aircraft Spruce at (951) 372-9555 ex. 456 or e-mail
him at anthonygarcia@aircraftspruce.com and give him quotation # 249314
--------
Ivan K.
www.ivankristensen.com
Builder # 40838
Flying (60 hrs.)
C-GMDV
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=322015#322015
Message 16
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Thottle cable length |
Thank you for that detail. Another option is to order cables you need from
McFarlane Aviation. They make high quality PMA cables for Cessnas and some
Pipers, and will custom make whatever you need. I haven't checked to see
which would be cheaper.
Kelly
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:34 PM, ivankris <ivankris@rogers.com> wrote:
>
> All three cables were too short in my installation. I returned all three to
> Vans for credit and then re-ordered the 50.5" throttle cable from Vans which
> is 3" longer than the one they ship with the kit.
>
> I then ordered two new cables (Mix & Prop) directly from the Mfg. and
> specified the length I wanted. They are a bit pricey (about twice Vans
> prices) that way but well worth the extra money to get the proper length for
> proper routing.
>
Message 17
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Thottle cable length |
aircraft spruce sells screw on extensions for the control cables-anybody tr
ied them?
-----Original Message-----
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2@gmail.com>
Sent: Wed, Dec 1, 2010 8:34 pm
Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Thottle cable length
Thank you for that detail. Another option is to order cables you need from
McFarlane Aviation. They make high quality PMA cables for Cessnas and some
Pipers, and will custom make whatever you need. I haven't checked to see wh
ich would be cheaper.
Kelly
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:34 PM, ivankris <ivankris@rogers.com> wrote:
All three cables were too short in my installation. I returned all three to
Vans for credit and then re-ordered the 50.5" throttle cable from Vans whi
ch is 3" longer than the one they ship with the kit.
I then ordered two new cables (Mix & Prop) directly from the Mfg. and speci
fied the length I wanted. They are a bit pricey (about twice Vans prices) t
hat way but well worth the extra money to get the proper length for proper
routing.
-
-= -- Please Support Your Lists This Month --
-= (And Get Some AWESOME FREE Gifts!)
-
-= November is the Annual List Fund Raiser. Click on
-= the Contribution link below to find out more about
-= this year's Terrific Free Incentive Gifts provided
-= by:
-
-= * AeroElectric www.aeroelectric.com
-= * The Builder's Bookstore www.buildersbooks.com
-= * HomebuiltHELP www.homebuilthelp.com
-
-= List Contribution Web Site:
-
-= --> http://www.matronics.com/contribution
-
-= Thank you for your generous support!
-
-= -Matt Dralle, List Admin.
-
-========================
-= - The RV10-List Email Forum -
-= Use the Matronics List Features Navigator to browse
-= the many List utilities such as List Un/Subscription,
-= Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ,
-= Photoshare, and much much more:
-
-= --> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
-
-========================
-= - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS -
-= Same great content also available via the Web Forums!
-
-= --> http://forums.matronics.com
-
-========================
Message 18
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Propeller exchange? |
I am considering a propeller change from Van=99s supplied Hartzell
2 blade blended airfoil: C2YR-1BFP/F8068D
TO
the MT 3 blade: MTV12B/193-53 recommended for the RV10.
My Hartzell has 300 hours since new, has been maintained IAW the
Hartzell manual and has no damage.
In exchange for a new unused MT I would have Hartzell blades factory
re-painted.
This propeller has provided great performance and is well balanced on my
aircraft. Exchange would include the entire spinner assembly,
preferable with both propellers.
Any one interested? What cash differential?
Dick Sipp
RV10-N110DV 40065 300 hours
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|