RV10-List Digest Archive

Sun 10/30/11


Total Messages Posted: 9



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 06:26 AM - Recreational pilot (Chris Hukill)
     2. 08:12 AM - Re: Recent Spam Mail (Matt Geans)
     3. 09:30 AM - Re: Recreational pilot (Bobby J. Hughes)
     4. 02:15 PM - Re: Recreational pilot (Kelly McMullen)
     5. 03:48 PM - Re: Recreational pilot (davidsoutpost@comcast.net)
     6. 06:52 PM - INERTIAL BELTS (DLM)
     7. 09:02 PM - Re: Recreational pilot (Bob Turner)
     8. 09:07 PM - Re: Recreational pilot (Bob Turner)
     9. 10:32 PM - Re: Re: Recreational pilot (Robin Marks)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:26:20 AM PST US
    From: "Chris Hukill" <cjhukill@cox.net>
    Subject: Recreational pilot
    When I built my RV-8 ten years ago, I had an engine built that produced 210 HP, but was limited by placards to 180 for the purpose of qualifying it to be flown under the Recreational pilots license. Back then AOPA was trying to get the Feds to allow that class of pilot to operate under the medical self certification exemption that is allowed for sport pilots, glider and balloon pilots. The restrictions back then would also require a fixed pitch prop, so I put one of those on as well. The Feds didn't go for it then, but said they would re-evaluate after the Sport pilots exemption has been in effect for about ten years. Well in the last ten years, there has been zero medical deficiency caused accidents for sport pilots. Now, again the EAA and AOPA lawyers are submitting to the FAA an exemption to allow the Rec pilots to self certify. The aircraft requirements would once again allow for a max of 180HP, but not a restriction for fixed pitch prop. The 2 seat restriction is also removed, and replaced with "one Passenger". So my question is...How does the RV10 perform with the reduced payload of 1 pax and 180HP? It would be interesting to experiment with a flying RV10 that was limited by how far in you push the throttle to see if it would be practical to placard your engine instruments to allow you to operate under those conditions without a medical. Even if the Feds required modifications to your IO540 to physically limit you to 180, at what altitude? The rules would require you to operate under 10,000 msl, but you could probably still pull 180HP at that altitude with your downrated motor. And you could still have the other 80 HP available for emergencies down low. A pilot with a medical could simply remove whatever limiting devise is require (placards) and fly it like a normal RV10. It would be nice to have that flexibility and would open your machine up to a whole other class (market) of pilots. Chris Hukill


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:12:21 AM PST US
    From: Matt Geans <mattgeans@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Recent Spam Mail
    All,-=0A=0A=0A=0AIt's come to my attention that virtually everyone with m y yahoo accout has recently been sent spam mail from me. -It was not sent by me and I don't think any of you are lonely and in need of company - or whatever. -=0A=0AThere is another computer that I think my yahoo logon is still in the cookies and that computer was getting some suspect e-mails to my work e-mail account which may have downloaded some malware to that comp uter and read the saved log-ons to my yahoo account.=0A=0AI just tried to s end this mail to all of you and Yahoo had already recognized the suspicious activity and blocked sending mails to multiple accounts till I contacted t hem.=0A=0AI have been far from lonely these days and haven't been on any si tes to instigate such activity.....Sorry for any-inconvenience.-=0A=0AM att


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:30:48 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Recreational pilot
    From: "Bobby J. Hughes" <bhughes@qnsi.net>
    Q2hyaXMsDQoNCkkgd291bGQgZXhwZWN0IGEgY2xpbWIgcmF0ZSBvZiA2MDAtNzAwIGZwbSBhdCAx ODAgSFAgd2l0aCBmd2Ygd2VpZ2h0IGVxdWFsIHRvIHRoZSBpbyA1NDAuIExpZ2h0ZXIgZndmIG1h eSBtYWtlIHRoZSByZWFyIGJhZ2dhZ2UgYXJlYSB3b3J0aGxlc3MuIA0KDQpCb2JieQ0KDQpTZW50 IGZyb20gbXkgaVBhZA0KDQpPbiBPY3QgMzAsIDIwMTEsIGF0IDg6MzcgQU0sICJDaHJpcyBIdWtp bGwiIDxjamh1a2lsbEBjb3gubmV0PiB3cm90ZToNCg0KPiBXaGVuIEkgYnVpbHQgbXkgUlYtOCB0 ZW4geWVhcnMgYWdvLCBJIGhhZCBhbiBlbmdpbmUgYnVpbHQgdGhhdCBwcm9kdWNlZCAyMTAgSFAs IGJ1dCB3YXMgbGltaXRlZCBieSBwbGFjYXJkcyB0byAxODAgZm9yIHRoZSBwdXJwb3NlIG9mIHF1 YWxpZnlpbmcgaXQgdG8gYmUgZmxvd24gdW5kZXIgdGhlIFJlY3JlYXRpb25hbCBwaWxvdHMgbGlj ZW5zZS4gQmFjayB0aGVuIEFPUEEgd2FzIHRyeWluZyB0byBnZXQgdGhlIEZlZHMgdG8gYWxsb3cg dGhhdCBjbGFzcyBvZiBwaWxvdCB0byBvcGVyYXRlIHVuZGVyIHRoZSBtZWRpY2FsIHNlbGYgY2Vy dGlmaWNhdGlvbiBleGVtcHRpb24gdGhhdCBpcyBhbGxvd2VkIGZvciBzcG9ydCBwaWxvdHMsIGds aWRlciBhbmQgYmFsbG9vbiBwaWxvdHMuIFRoZSByZXN0cmljdGlvbnMgYmFjayB0aGVuIHdvdWxk IGFsc28gcmVxdWlyZSBhIGZpeGVkIHBpdGNoIHByb3AsIHNvIEkgcHV0IG9uZSBvZiB0aG9zZSBv biBhcyB3ZWxsLg0KPiBUaGUgRmVkcyBkaWRuJ3QgZ28gZm9yIGl0IHRoZW4sIGJ1dCBzYWlkIHRo ZXkgd291bGQgcmUtZXZhbHVhdGUgYWZ0ZXIgdGhlIFNwb3J0IHBpbG90cyBleGVtcHRpb24gaGFz IGJlZW4gaW4gZWZmZWN0IGZvciBhYm91dCB0ZW4geWVhcnMuIFdlbGwgaW4gdGhlIGxhc3QgdGVu IHllYXJzLCB0aGVyZSBoYXMgYmVlbiB6ZXJvIG1lZGljYWwgZGVmaWNpZW5jeSBjYXVzZWQgYWNj aWRlbnRzIGZvciBzcG9ydCBwaWxvdHMuIE5vdywgYWdhaW4gdGhlIEVBQSBhbmQgQU9QQSBsYXd5 ZXJzIGFyZSBzdWJtaXR0aW5nIHRvIHRoZSBGQUEgYW4gZXhlbXB0aW9uIHRvIGFsbG93IHRoZSBS ZWMgcGlsb3RzIHRvIHNlbGYgY2VydGlmeS4gVGhlIGFpcmNyYWZ0IHJlcXVpcmVtZW50cyB3b3Vs ZCBvbmNlIGFnYWluIGFsbG93IGZvciBhIG1heCBvZiAxODBIUCwgYnV0IG5vdCBhIHJlc3RyaWN0 aW9uIGZvciBmaXhlZCBwaXRjaCBwcm9wLiBUaGUgMiBzZWF0IHJlc3RyaWN0aW9uIGlzIGFsc28g cmVtb3ZlZCwgYW5kIHJlcGxhY2VkIHdpdGggIm9uZSBQYXNzZW5nZXIiLiBTbyBteSBxdWVzdGlv biBpcy4uLkhvdyBkb2VzIHRoZSBSVjEwIHBlcmZvcm0gd2l0aCB0aGUgcmVkdWNlZCBwYXlsb2Fk IG9mIDEgcGF4IGFuZCAxODBIUD8gSXQgd291bGQgYmUgaW50ZXJlc3RpbmcgdG8gZXhwZXJpbWVu dCB3aXRoIGEgZmx5aW5nIFJWMTAgdGhhdCB3YXMgbGltaXRlZCBieSBob3cgZmFyIGluIHlvdSBw dXNoIHRoZSB0aHJvdHRsZSB0byBzZWUgaWYgaXQgd291bGQgYmUgcHJhY3RpY2FsIHRvIHBsYWNh cmQgeW91ciBlbmdpbmUgaW5zdHJ1bWVudHMgdG8gYWxsb3cgeW91IHRvIG9wZXJhdGUgdW5kZXIg dGhvc2UgY29uZGl0aW9ucyB3aXRob3V0IGEgbWVkaWNhbC4gRXZlbiAgaWYgdGhlIEZlZHMgcmVx dWlyZWQgbW9kaWZpY2F0aW9ucyB0byB5b3VyIElPNTQwIHRvIHBoeXNpY2FsbHkgbGltaXQgeW91 IHRvIDE4MCwgYXQgd2hhdCBhbHRpdHVkZT8gVGhlIHJ1bGVzIHdvdWxkIHJlcXVpcmUgeW91IHRv IG9wZXJhdGUgdW5kZXIgMTAsMDAwIG1zbCwgYnV0IHlvdSBjb3VsZCBwcm9iYWJseSBzdGlsbCBw dWxsIDE4MEhQIGF0IHRoYXQgYWx0aXR1ZGUgd2l0aCB5b3VyIGRvd25yYXRlZCBtb3Rvci4gQW5k IHlvdSBjb3VsZCBzdGlsbCBoYXZlIHRoZSBvdGhlciA4MCBIUCBhdmFpbGFibGUgZm9yIGVtZXJn ZW5jaWVzIGRvd24gbG93LiAgQSBwaWxvdCB3aXRoIGEgbWVkaWNhbCBjb3VsZCBzaW1wbHkgcmVt b3ZlIHdoYXRldmVyIGxpbWl0aW5nIGRldmlzZSBpcyByZXF1aXJlIChwbGFjYXJkcykgYW5kIGZs eSBpdCBsaWtlIGEgbm9ybWFsIFJWMTAuIEl0IHdvdWxkIGJlIG5pY2UgdG8gaGF2ZSB0aGF0IGZs ZXhpYmlsaXR5IGFuZCB3b3VsZCBvcGVuIHlvdXIgbWFjaGluZSB1cCB0byBhIHdob2xlIG90aGVy IGNsYXNzIChtYXJrZXQpIG9mIHBpbG90cy4gDQo+IENocmlzIEh1a2lsbA0KPiANCj4gDQo+IF8t PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09DQo+IF8tPSAgICAgICAgICAtIFRoZSBSVjEwLUxpc3QgRW1haWwgRm9ydW0gLQ0KPiBfLT0g VXNlIHRoZSBNYXRyb25pY3MgTGlzdCBGZWF0dXJlcyBOYXZpZ2F0b3IgdG8gYnJvd3NlDQo+IF8t PSB0aGUgbWFueSBMaXN0IHV0aWxpdGllcyBzdWNoIGFzIExpc3QgVW4vU3Vic2NyaXB0aW9uLA0K PiBfLT0gQXJjaGl2ZSBTZWFyY2ggJiBEb3dubG9hZCwgNy1EYXkgQnJvd3NlLCBDaGF0LCBGQVEs DQo+IF8tPSBQaG90b3NoYXJlLCBhbmQgbXVjaCBtdWNoIG1vcmU6DQo+IF8tPQ0KPiBfLT0gICAt LT4gaHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tL05hdmlnYXRvcj9SVjEwLUxpc3QNCj4gXy09DQo+ IF8tPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09DQo+IF8tPSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIC0gTUFUUk9OSUNTIFdFQiBGT1JVTVMgLQ0KPiBf LT0gU2FtZSBncmVhdCBjb250ZW50IGFsc28gYXZhaWxhYmxlIHZpYSB0aGUgV2ViIEZvcnVtcyEN Cj4gXy09DQo+IF8tPSAgIC0tPiBodHRwOi8vZm9ydW1zLm1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20NCj4gXy09DQo+ IF8tPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09DQo+IF8tPSAgICAgICAgICAgICAtIExpc3QgQ29udHJpYnV0aW9uIFdlYiBTaXRlIC0N Cj4gXy09ICBUaGFuayB5b3UgZm9yIHlvdXIgZ2VuZXJvdXMgc3VwcG9ydCENCj4gXy09ICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgLU1hdHQgRHJhbGxlLCBMaXN0IEFkbWluLg0KPiBfLT0g ICAtLT4gaHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tL2NvbnRyaWJ1dGlvbg0KPiBfLT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQ0KPiAN Cg=


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:15:02 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Recreational pilot
    From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2@gmail.com>
    I would expect the FAA to place the same stringent requirements on a qualifying aircraft as they do for Light Sport. That is that from certification forward it must have met the requirements of the category at all times. In other words they don't let you go back and forth between categories. Hard to say if they would place a gross wt limit on the category...don't recall if there ever was one. There are some numbers that Vans has for the prototype with Continental IO-360 engine as to performance. I don't believe that engine has ever been derated below 195hp. On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Bobby J. Hughes <bhughes@qnsi.net> wrote: > Chris, > > I would expect a climb rate of 600-700 fpm at 180 HP with fwf weight equal > to the io 540. Lighter fwf may make the rear baggage area worthless. > > Bobby > > Sent from my iPad > >


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:48:04 PM PST US
    From: davidsoutpost@comcast.net
    Subject: Re: Recreational pilot
    There is also a maximum 130 knot limitation. David Clifford RV-10 Builder Howell, MI ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Hukill" <cjhukill@cox.net> Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2011 9:22:01 AM Subject: RV10-List: Recreational pilot When I built my RV-8 ten years ago, I had an engine built that produced 210 HP, but was limited by placards to 180 for the purpose of qualifying it to be flown under the Recreational pilots license. Back then AOPA was trying to get the Feds to allow that class of pilot to operate under the medical s elf certification exemption that is allowed for sport pilots, glider and ba lloon pilots. The restrictions back then would also require a fixed pitch p rop, so I put one of those on as well. The Feds didn't go for it then, but said they would re-evaluate after the S port pilots exemption has been in effect for about ten years. Well in the l ast ten years, there has been zero medical deficiency caused accidents for sport pilots. Now, again the EAA and AOPA lawyers are submitting to the FAA an exemption to allow the Rec pilots to self certify. The aircraft require ments would once again allow for a max of 180HP, but not a restriction for fixed pitch prop. The 2 seat restriction is also removed, and replaced with "one Passenger". So my question is...How does the RV10 perform with the re duced payload of 1 pax and 180HP? It would be interesting to experiment wit h a flying RV10 that was limited by how far in you push the throttle to see if it would be practical to placard your engine instruments to allow you t o operate under those conditions without a medical. Even if the Feds requir ed modifications to your IO540 to physically limit you to 180, at what alti tude? The rules would require you to operate under 10,000 msl, but you coul d probably still pull 180HP at that altitude with your downrated motor. And you could still have the other 80 HP available for emergencies down low. A pilot with a medical could simply remove whatever limiting devise is requi re (placards) and fly it like a normal RV10. It would be nice to have that flexibility and would open your machine up to a whole other class (market) of pilots. ============== ==


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:52:46 PM PST US
    From: "DLM" <dlm34077@q.com>
    Subject: INERTIAL BELTS
    My son is again asking whether I want to renew the URL for www.inertialbelts.com <http://www.inertialbelts.com/> . This was originally setup after I participated with AMSAFE to TSO some belts for my RV10. I kept the site on the net because I thought others may want to use the belts or techniques. If anyone is still interested please advise me directly so that I can determine whether to keep the site up another year. Thanks. IIRC we also TSOed a set for the RV 7 and 9 at someone's request even though the anchors were not documented.


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:02:26 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Recreational pilot
    From: "Bob Turner" <bobturner@alum.rpi.edu>
    I don't recall any speed limitations for recreational pilots. There is one for Sport Pilots. The FAR wording says the aircraft must not have been certificated for more than 2 seats. So I don't think you can go back and forth between a "regular" RV-10 (4 seats) and a "recreational" one. You have to declare the number of seats when you get your A/W inspection. Once in writing, it's not easy to change. -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=356382#356382


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:07:33 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Recreational pilot
    From: "Bob Turner" <bobturner@alum.rpi.edu>
    Ignore my last comment. I see that you say the FAA has changed the wording from 2 seats to one passenger. Is this done, or a proposal? -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=356384#356384


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:32:34 PM PST US
    From: Robin Marks <robin@PaintTheWeb.com>
    Subject: Re: Recreational pilot
    Not to put too fine a point on it but... I think one would end up with an expensive, heavy, underpowered aircraft that has minimal resale potential. Robin Do Not Archive




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv10-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV10-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv10-list
  • Browse RV10-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --