RV10-List Digest Archive

Wed 04/25/12


Total Messages Posted: 19



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:13 AM - Re: firewall sealing (Rick Lark)
     2. 05:27 AM - Alternative glue for the elevators foam ribs (Carlos Trigo)
     3. 05:45 AM - Re: Alternative glue for the elevators foam ribs (Patrick Pulis)
     4. 07:23 AM - Re: Alternative glue for the elevators foam ribs (Kelly McMullen)
     5. 07:49 AM - Re: firewall sealing (Kelly McMullen)
     6. 08:17 AM - Re: firewall sealing (Werner Schneider)
     7. 08:34 AM - Re: firewall sealing (DLM)
     8. 09:28 AM - Re: firewall sealing (Rick Lark)
     9. 10:06 AM - Re: firewall sealing (Pascal)
    10. 10:23 AM - Re: firewall sealing (DLM)
    11. 10:34 AM - Re: firewall sealing (DLM)
    12. 10:49 AM - Re: firewall sealing (DLM)
    13. 11:40 AM - Re: Alternative glue for the elevators foam ribs (Ed Kranz)
    14. 04:06 PM - Gretz Pitot & Aileron Trim (Dave Fritzsche (Building))
    15. 04:54 PM - Re: Gretz Pitot & Aileron Trim (Rene Felker)
    16. 05:29 PM - Re: Gretz Pitot & Aileron Trim (Carl Froehlich)
    17. 07:10 PM - Re: Gretz Pitot & Aileron Trim (Ben Westfall)
    18. 08:16 PM - Re: Gretz Pitot & Aileron Trim (Ron Mara)
    19. 08:17 PM - Re: Gretz Pitot & Aileron Trim (Ron Mara)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:13:33 AM PST US
    From: "Rick Lark" <jrlark@bmts.com>
    Subject: Re: firewall sealing
    Thx all, I am on my way to Aircraft Spruce this morning to pick up a few things. I probably will buy a tube of Biotherm 100 which is rated to 2000 degrees. I did find a write up on the Plane Innovations web site, www.planeinnovations.com/firewallkits.html. I will stay away from the RVT. Rick ----- Original Message ----- From: John Cox To: rv10-list@matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 1:39 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: firewall sealing Rick, the area in question deserves the best sealant possible. RTV is a cheap and easy solution that does NOT meet the challenge. I installed a product Desoto Proseal CS-1900 which was a fiberous proseal type "fire-retandant" sealant with the manufacturers endorsement of higher temperature. When your fire annunciator system fails. When Your Fire Suppression system fails, your only recourse is to think of Bob Hoover and pray. Dont use RTV. Time from point of crisis awareness to remediation is the longest period in your life. FLY the damn aircraft to a safe landing point. Fly the aircraft to the accident site and insure that all POBs are safely away. From the moment of acknowledgement of a fire to the moment of safety, your actions speak volumes on your instruction and skill as a pilot. I lost a friend leaving OSH a few years ago that failed to heed those words in his Lancair Legacy 2000. Thought he could be a HERO. "From the moment of acknowledgement to the moment of reflection on your actions , a great pilot knows the aircraft instantly belongs to the insurance company. Your responsibility is to your passengers, your family and your brothers-in-arms who love flying after your memorial service. "Dan Lloyd, I still miss you and pray I follow the wiser choice and don't place human life on a $ savings on RTV.". CHOOSE WISELY, FLY OFTEN, THINK ABOUT THOSE WHO WILL FOLLOW. You guys slay me occasionally on the decision process you follow! DAMN I AM GETTING OLD. John #40600 On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Rick Lark <larkrv10@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Guys, I see that Vans wants you to seal the F-1001K stainles recess with pro seal..Did anyone use some other type of high temp sealant for this purpose. Seems to me even hi temp RTV would be beter than pro seal? Comments?? Thx, Rick #40956 Southampton, Ont get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:27:07 AM PST US
    From: "Carlos Trigo" <trigo@mail.telepac.pt>
    Subject: Alternative glue for the elevators foam ribs
    I am building the elevators, and as you know, one has to glue the trailing edge foam ribs to the elevator skins interior. Van's plans want you to use that ##$&&%% tank sealant, which I really hate to use (probably one of the reasons I always go with the QB kit . :-)). What are the alternative glues that can be used is this case, which obviously don't melt the foam and don't corrode the aluminium skins? Carlos


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:45:35 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Alternative glue for the elevators foam ribs
    From: Patrick Pulis <rv10free2fly@yahoo.com.au>
    Just stick to the Proseal, it's tried and proven and not all that bad compar ed with itchy fibreglass. Wait until you get to the cabin top & doors. Warm regards Patrick On 25/04/2012, at 9:54 PM, "Carlos Trigo" <trigo@mail.telepac.pt> wrote: > I am building the elevators, and as you know, one has to glue the trailing edge foam ribs to the elevator skins interior. > Van=99s plans want you to use that ##$&&%% tank sealant, which I rea lly hate to use (probably one of the reasons I always go with the QB kit J). > > What are the alternative glues that can be used is this case, which obviou sly don=99t melt the foam and don=99t corrode the aluminium skin s? > > Carlos > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= >


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:23:08 AM PST US
    From: Kelly McMullen <kellym@aviating.com>
    Subject: Re: Alternative glue for the elevators foam ribs
    If you don't want to deal with the pint or quart containers, Van's sells the 1/2 oz film cannister size which is all you need for the trailing edge. Only wish they would offer it in B-2 instead of B-1/2, as the 30 min pot life gets shortened by 50% for each ten degrees over 75, a rather common condition here in Aridzona. On 4/25/2012 5:24 AM, Carlos Trigo wrote: > > I am building the elevators, and as you know, one has to glue the > trailing edge foam ribs to the elevator skins interior. > > Vans plans want you to use that ##$&&%% tank sealant, which I really > hate to use (probably one of the reasons I always go with the QB kit J). > > What are the alternative glues that can be used is this case, which > obviously dont melt the foam and dont corrode the aluminium skins? > > Carlos > > * > > > * ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:49:06 AM PST US
    From: Kelly McMullen <kellym@aviating.com>
    Subject: Re: firewall sealing
    I fault Van's for simply calling for proseal when they clearly should be calling for the Proseal 1900 or other suitable sealant. While proseal may be adequate for keeping carbon monoxide from seeping through the firewall, it gives no fire protection. Not to mention Van's supplying aluminum heater control boxes that simply defeat the benefits of having a firewall completely. The Plane innovations or other stainless heater control boxes both work better and restore the all stainless content on the firewall, and come with a small tube of Biotherm. Also unfortunate that Van's doesn't do much product improvement over time. Apparently afraid to admit that something could be better than their original specifications. On 4/24/2012 10:39 PM, John Cox wrote: > Rick,*the area in question deserves the best sealant possible*. > John #40600 > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Rick Lark <larkrv10@gmail.com > <mailto:larkrv10@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi Guys, I see that Vans wants you to seal the F-1001K stainles > recess with pro seal..Did anyone use some other type of high temp > sealant for this purpose. Seems to me even hi temp RTV would be > beter than pro seal? > ** > ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:17:21 AM PST US
    From: Werner Schneider <glastar@gmx.net>
    Subject: Re: firewall sealing
    Kelly, > firewall, it gives no fire protection. Not to mention Van's supplying > aluminum heater control boxes that simply defeat the benefits of having you forgot to mention, that the FW is as well riveted with alu rivets to the structure, so that will not help either in case of a fire. Cheers Werner


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:34:43 AM PST US
    From: "DLM" <dlm34077@q.com>
    Subject: firewall sealing
    My answer to the fire problem (hope I never need it), 10# of Halon sprayed between the firewall and baffling and over the engine. From Stroud Fire Safety OKC _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Kelly McMullen Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 7:34 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: firewall sealing I fault Van's for simply calling for proseal when they clearly should be calling for the Proseal 1900 or other suitable sealant. While proseal may be adequate for keeping carbon monoxide from seeping through the firewall, it gives no fire protection. Not to mention Van's supplying aluminum heater control boxes that simply defeat the benefits of having a firewall completely. The Plane innovations or other stainless heater control boxes both work better and restore the all stainless content on the firewall, and come with a small tube of Biotherm. Also unfortunate that Van's doesn't do much product improvement over time. Apparently afraid to admit that something could be better than their original specifications. On 4/24/2012 10:39 PM, John Cox wrote: Rick, the area in question deserves the best sealant possible. John #40600 On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Rick Lark <larkrv10@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Guys, I see that Vans wants you to seal the F-1001K stainles recess with pro seal..Did anyone use some other type of high temp sealant for this purpose. Seems to me even hi temp RTV would be beter than pro seal? No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:28:35 AM PST US
    From: "Rick Lark" <jrlark@bmts.com>
    Subject: Re: firewall sealing
    Werner, the fact that there are aluminum rivets crossed my mind too. None the less John Cox is right, you owe it to your pasengers and yourself to make the firewall as good as possible. Solid rivets are still more fire resistant than normal pro seal, and using the Biotherm 100 is a step in the right direction. Perhaps another look at the David McNeils under cowling fire suppresion system is in order. Rick ----- Original Message ----- From: "Werner Schneider" <glastar@gmx.net> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 11:14 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: firewall sealing > > Kelly, > >> firewall, it gives no fire protection. Not to mention Van's supplying >> aluminum heater control boxes that simply defeat the benefits of having > > you forgot to mention, that the FW is as well riveted with alu rivets to > the structure, so that will not help either in case of a fire. > > Cheers Werner > > >


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:06:56 AM PST US
    From: "Pascal" <rv10flyer@verizon.net>
    Subject: Re: firewall sealing
    Your hosed if there is a fire! Rivets are the least of your problem, the issue is sealing the area around the rivets and the areas that are most prone to "holding off" the fire and smoke with a heat sealant. We are talking buying time here, the smoke will blind and cause all sorts of breathing issues, hence the solid steel vents (that I know seal better than the Vans one) but inhaling burning proseal is not something I would want to add to the issue. There are many rivets, there is a whole lot of fiberglass above the area, the glass will give far sooner than the rivets ever will. -----Original Message----- From: Rick Lark Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 9:25 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: firewall sealing Werner, the fact that there are aluminum rivets crossed my mind too. None the less John Cox is right, you owe it to your pasengers and yourself to make the firewall as good as possible. Solid rivets are still more fire resistant than normal pro seal, and using the Biotherm 100 is a step in the right direction. Perhaps another look at the David McNeils under cowling fire suppresion system is in order. Rick ----- Original Message ----- From: "Werner Schneider" <glastar@gmx.net> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 11:14 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: firewall sealing > > Kelly, > >> firewall, it gives no fire protection. Not to mention Van's supplying >> aluminum heater control boxes that simply defeat the benefits of having > > you forgot to mention, that the FW is as well riveted with alu rivets to > the structure, so that will not help either in case of a fire. > > Cheers Werner > >


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:23:37 AM PST US
    From: "DLM" <dlm34077@q.com>
    Subject: firewall sealing
    A before and after photo; I teed it at the firewall, one sprayer was clamped near the spider and the other was between the firewall and baffling. Be sure and isolate engine vibrations from the sprayers by a rubber flex tube between with hose clamps. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rick Lark Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 9:25 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: firewall sealing Werner, the fact that there are aluminum rivets crossed my mind too. None the less John Cox is right, you owe it to your pasengers and yourself to make the firewall as good as possible. Solid rivets are still more fire resistant than normal pro seal, and using the Biotherm 100 is a step in the right direction. Perhaps another look at the David McNeils under cowling fire suppresion system is in order. Rick ----- Original Message ----- From: "Werner Schneider" <glastar@gmx.net> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 11:14 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: firewall sealing > > Kelly, > >> firewall, it gives no fire protection. Not to mention Van's supplying >> aluminum heater control boxes that simply defeat the benefits of having > > you forgot to mention, that the FW is as well riveted with alu rivets to > the structure, so that will not help either in case of a fire. > > Cheers Werner > > >


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:34:15 AM PST US
    From: "DLM" <dlm34077@q.com>
    Subject: firewall sealing
    If you are worried about fire, think fire suppression. Try http://www.stroudsafety.com/FireExtinguisherSystems.html All of that fiberglass is going to burn well with a lot of noxious fumes. It's best to put it out. Fuel selector OFF, pull the pin and blow the bottle. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Pascal Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:04 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: firewall sealing Your hosed if there is a fire! Rivets are the least of your problem, the issue is sealing the area around the rivets and the areas that are most prone to "holding off" the fire and smoke with a heat sealant. We are talking buying time here, the smoke will blind and cause all sorts of breathing issues, hence the solid steel vents (that I know seal better than the Vans one) but inhaling burning proseal is not something I would want to add to the issue. There are many rivets, there is a whole lot of fiberglass above the area, the glass will give far sooner than the rivets ever will. -----Original Message----- From: Rick Lark Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 9:25 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: firewall sealing Werner, the fact that there are aluminum rivets crossed my mind too. None the less John Cox is right, you owe it to your pasengers and yourself to make the firewall as good as possible. Solid rivets are still more fire resistant than normal pro seal, and using the Biotherm 100 is a step in the right direction. Perhaps another look at the David McNeils under cowling fire suppresion system is in order. Rick ----- Original Message ----- From: "Werner Schneider" <glastar@gmx.net> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 11:14 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: firewall sealing > > Kelly, > >> firewall, it gives no fire protection. Not to mention Van's supplying >> aluminum heater control boxes that simply defeat the benefits of having > > you forgot to mention, that the FW is as well riveted with alu rivets to > the structure, so that will not help either in case of a fire. > > Cheers Werner > > > >


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:49:40 AM PST US
    From: "DLM" <dlm34077@q.com>
    Subject: firewall sealing
    Email check -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Pascal Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:04 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: firewall sealing Your hosed if there is a fire! Rivets are the least of your problem, the issue is sealing the area around the rivets and the areas that are most prone to "holding off" the fire and smoke with a heat sealant. We are talking buying time here, the smoke will blind and cause all sorts of breathing issues, hence the solid steel vents (that I know seal better than the Vans one) but inhaling burning proseal is not something I would want to add to the issue. There are many rivets, there is a whole lot of fiberglass above the area, the glass will give far sooner than the rivets ever will. -----Original Message----- From: Rick Lark Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 9:25 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: firewall sealing Werner, the fact that there are aluminum rivets crossed my mind too. None the less John Cox is right, you owe it to your pasengers and yourself to make the firewall as good as possible. Solid rivets are still more fire resistant than normal pro seal, and using the Biotherm 100 is a step in the right direction. Perhaps another look at the David McNeils under cowling fire suppresion system is in order. Rick ----- Original Message ----- From: "Werner Schneider" <glastar@gmx.net> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 11:14 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: firewall sealing > > Kelly, > >> firewall, it gives no fire protection. Not to mention Van's supplying >> aluminum heater control boxes that simply defeat the benefits of having > > you forgot to mention, that the FW is as well riveted with alu rivets to > the structure, so that will not help either in case of a fire. > > Cheers Werner > >


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:40:44 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Alternative glue for the elevators foam ribs
    From: Ed Kranz <ed.kranz@gmail.com>
    I just did the elevator trailing edges, ribs, and trim tab ribs last night. I used the "mix in the tube" 3.5oz tank sealant from Vans, and it was just enough for all those parts. (Part number MC-236-B1/2) You can stick the tube in a caulk gun and just shoot it onto the part and spread it out. It took me about 30 minutes for the entire process. Simple, and no measuring needed. On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Kelly McMullen <kellym@aviating.com> wrote: > > If you don't want to deal with the pint or quart containers, Van's sells the > 1/2 oz film cannister size which is all you need for the trailing edge. Only > wish they would offer it in B-2 instead of B-1/2, as the 30 min pot life > gets shortened by 50% for each ten degrees over 75, a rather common > condition here in Aridzona. > > > On 4/25/2012 5:24 AM, Carlos Trigo wrote: >> >> >> I am building the elevators, and as you know, one has to glue the trailing >> edge foam ribs to the elevator skins interior. >> >> Vans plans want you to use that ##$&&%% tank sealant, which I really hate >> to use (probably one of the reasons I always go with the QB kit J). >> >> What are the alternative glues that can be used is this case, which >> obviously dont melt the foam and dont corrode the aluminium skins? >> >> Carlos >> >> * >> >> >> * > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > >


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:06:43 PM PST US
    From: "Dave Fritzsche (Building)" <fritzsch@eskimo.com>
    Subject: Gretz Pitot & Aileron Trim
    Two questions: 1. Where have you mounted the Gretz control module? Ideally it would be mounted so that the face of the wire connecting block and the screws that hold the wire in place would be easily accessible from the inspection opening. The location of the three attachment points on the module make that a little difficult. I have placed the head mount in the position called for by the plans. Access would seem to dictate that it be mounted on the inspection hole side (outboard side) of the rib with the pitot mount on the inboard side of the rib, but I can's seem to find a position that would make both the connecting face and the screws on the module easy to see and tighten. 2. It would appear to be much easier to install the aileron trim before the bottom skin was attached. But as I read the instructions for the trim servo, it looks like one has to wait until the ailerons are attached to the wings and possibly the wings are attached to the airplane. Is that correct? Dave -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Fritzsche 40813 Puyallup, WA Wings ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:54:29 PM PST US
    From: "Rene Felker" <rene@felker.com>
    Subject: Gretz Pitot & Aileron Trim
    I mounted my Gretz control module to the inspection plate. Easy and accessible. I did my Aileron trim after the wing was on the airplane....but I think you could do it after the bottom skin was on but before you put the wing on the airplane. Rene' Felker N423CF 801-721-6080 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dave Fritzsche (Building) Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 5:05 PM Subject: RV10-List: Gretz Pitot & Aileron Trim --> <fritzsch@eskimo.com> Two questions: 1. Where have you mounted the Gretz control module? Ideally it would be mounted so that the face of the wire connecting block and the screws that hold the wire in place would be easily accessible from the inspection opening. The location of the three attachment points on the module make that a little difficult. I have placed the head mount in the position called for by the plans. Access would seem to dictate that it be mounted on the inspection hole side (outboard side) of the rib with the pitot mount on the inboard side of the rib, but I can's seem to find a position that would make both the connecting face and the screws on the module easy to see and tighten. 2. It would appear to be much easier to install the aileron trim before the bottom skin was attached. But as I read the instructions for the trim servo, it looks like one has to wait until the ailerons are attached to the wings and possibly the wings are attached to the airplane. Is that correct? Dave -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Fritzsche 40813 Puyallup, WA Wings ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:29:23 PM PST US
    From: "Carl Froehlich" <carl.froehlich@verizon.net>
    Subject: Gretz Pitot & Aileron Trim
    You can of course fit up the aileron trim servo mount onto the inboard left wing inspection plate. You cannot fit the aileron trim spring attachments to the aileron push tube until after the wings are on and the control surfaces are rigged. The aileron push tube needs to first be correct, "stick centered" position to determine where to put the spring attachments. Remember that the push tube is easily removed via the wing tip once you mark where the attachments go. Carl Pitot static test completed today - trying to get the FSDO out the first week in May. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rene Felker Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 7:53 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Gretz Pitot & Aileron Trim I mounted my Gretz control module to the inspection plate. Easy and accessible. I did my Aileron trim after the wing was on the airplane....but I think you could do it after the bottom skin was on but before you put the wing on the airplane. Rene' Felker N423CF 801-721-6080 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dave Fritzsche (Building) Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 5:05 PM Subject: RV10-List: Gretz Pitot & Aileron Trim --> <fritzsch@eskimo.com> Two questions: 1. Where have you mounted the Gretz control module? Ideally it would be mounted so that the face of the wire connecting block and the screws that hold the wire in place would be easily accessible from the inspection opening. The location of the three attachment points on the module make that a little difficult. I have placed the head mount in the position called for by the plans. Access would seem to dictate that it be mounted on the inspection hole side (outboard side) of the rib with the pitot mount on the inboard side of the rib, but I can's seem to find a position that would make both the connecting face and the screws on the module easy to see and tighten. 2. It would appear to be much easier to install the aileron trim before the bottom skin was attached. But as I read the instructions for the trim servo, it looks like one has to wait until the ailerons are attached to the wings and possibly the wings are attached to the airplane. Is that correct? Dave -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Fritzsche 40813 Puyallup, WA Wings ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:10:52 PM PST US
    From: "Ben Westfall" <rv10@sinkrate.com>
    Subject: Gretz Pitot & Aileron Trim
    I thought it would be easier to install the gretz using molex connectors for the wires so I mounted the assembly just inside of the wing rib inside the inspection plate. I split the wires leading from the pitot to the control unit and added appropriately sized molex connector. The thought being that installing the pitot is just a matter of snapping the molex connector tight instead of trying to work those little screws while upside down. Not flying yet so as to effectiveness and reliability.... WAG. Ben Westfall 40579 Portland, OR -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dave Fritzsche (Building) Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 4:05 PM Subject: RV10-List: Gretz Pitot & Aileron Trim Two questions: 1. Where have you mounted the Gretz control module? Ideally it would be mounted so that the face of the wire connecting block and the screws that hold the wire in place would be easily accessible from the inspection opening. The location of the three attachment points on the module make that a little difficult. I have placed the head mount in the position called for by the plans. Access would seem to dictate that it be mounted on the inspection hole side (outboard side) of the rib with the pitot mount on the inboard side of the rib, but I can's seem to find a position that would make both the connecting face and the screws on the module easy to see and tighten. 2. It would appear to be much easier to install the aileron trim before the bottom skin was attached. But as I read the instructions for the trim servo, it looks like one has to wait until the ailerons are attached to the wings and possibly the wings are attached to the airplane. Is that correct? Dave -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Fritzsche 40813 Puyallup, WA Wings ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:16:22 PM PST US
    From: "Ron Mara" <mara@leasenet.net>
    Subject: Re: Gretz Pitot & Aileron Trim
    Dave, I don't normally post but I think my installation worked out well. I have posted three different views. I would not place the controller outboard of the rib. The two AN3's are easily reached thru the access cover. Ron Mara Addison, Texas ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Fritzsche (Building)" <fritzsch@eskimo.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 6:04 PM Subject: RV10-List: Gretz Pitot & Aileron Trim > <fritzsch@eskimo.com> > > Two questions: > > 1. Where have you mounted the Gretz control module? Ideally it would be > mounted so that the face of the wire connecting block and the screws that > hold the wire in place would be easily accessible from the inspection > opening. The location of the three attachment points on the module make > that a little difficult. I have placed the head mount in the position > called for by the plans. Access would seem to dictate that it be mounted > on the inspection hole side (outboard side) of the rib with the pitot > mount on the inboard side of the rib, but I can's seem to find a position > that would make both the connecting face and the screws on the module easy > to see and tighten. > > 2. It would appear to be much easier to install the aileron trim before > the bottom skin was attached. But as I read the instructions for the trim > servo, it looks like one has to wait until the ailerons are attached to > the wings and possibly the wings are attached to the airplane. Is that > correct? > > Dave > > -- > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Dave Fritzsche > 40813 > Puyallup, WA > Wings > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 7086 (20120425) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7086 (20120425) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:17:38 PM PST US
    From: "Ron Mara" <mara@leasenet.net>
    Subject: Re: Gretz Pitot & Aileron Trim
    Sorry, size restriction... here's the third photo. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Fritzsche (Building)" <fritzsch@eskimo.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 6:04 PM Subject: RV10-List: Gretz Pitot & Aileron Trim > <fritzsch@eskimo.com> > > Two questions: > > 1. Where have you mounted the Gretz control module? Ideally it would be > mounted so that the face of the wire connecting block and the screws that > hold the wire in place would be easily accessible from the inspection > opening. The location of the three attachment points on the module make > that a little difficult. I have placed the head mount in the position > called for by the plans. Access would seem to dictate that it be mounted > on the inspection hole side (outboard side) of the rib with the pitot > mount on the inboard side of the rib, but I can's seem to find a position > that would make both the connecting face and the screws on the module easy > to see and tighten. > > 2. It would appear to be much easier to install the aileron trim before > the bottom skin was attached. But as I read the instructions for the trim > servo, it looks like one has to wait until the ailerons are attached to > the wings and possibly the wings are attached to the airplane. Is that > correct? > > Dave > > -- > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Dave Fritzsche > 40813 > Puyallup, WA > Wings > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 7086 (20120425) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7086 (20120425) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv10-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV10-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv10-list
  • Browse RV10-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --