Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 03:34 AM - Re: Re: Starship at Yuma (Kelly McMullen)
2. 12:34 PM - Chelton data storage (DLM)
3. 06:39 PM - Re: Low Fuel Sensor Location (Rick Lark)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Starship at Yuma |
I heard on the Beech list that one is still owned by a friend of
Rutan's, and he was offered a King Air 350 in exchange and turned it
down.
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Bob Turner <bobturner@alum.rpi.edu> wrote:
>
> Another composite airplane that didn't quite live up to its billing. Beech just
couldn't get the weight down to their original estimates, so they ended up
with a full load/very short range or long range/very few passengers airplane.
>
> I may be wrong, but I think a few years ago Beech stated that they would no longer
support the Starship, and offered something (I don't know how generous)
to buy back the remaining ones?
>
> --------
> Bob Turner
> RV-10 QB
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=372569#372569
>
>
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Chelton data storage |
I am installing a BlackVue DR400G HD DVR in my aircraft; this will be pilot
selectable on or off to record takeoffs, landings, other flight for later
review. The camera has no way to add intercom audio to the recording so the
only audio input will be some voice and lots of engine noise. If there is
ever an incident it might be advisable to synchronize the video with Chelton
EFIS data. The question is how much EFIS data is stored and for how long?
David McNeill
N46007 570TT
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Low Fuel Sensor Location |
Hey Michael
I see in your KIt Pro log, you stated dihedral was 3.5 degrees, and angle
of incidence was 1.5 degrees plus. Does that mean the spar is leaning 1.5
degrees at the top or bottom? I guess since there is almost always some
turbulence in flight, it probably doesn't matter. Does this sound right to
you? I'm also going to install optical sensors. Thx for your advise.
Rick
#40956
Southampton, Ont
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Michael Sausen <michael@sausen.net> wrote:
>
> If you can find my entries in the http://www.mykitlog.com/msausen/ site,
> I actually put one of the wings in flight orientation and used a manometer
> to set the 5gal mark. Haven't flown it yet though so YMMV.
>
> Michael
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:
> owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tom Koelzer
> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 4:25 PM
> To: rv10-list@matronics.com
> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Low Fuel Sensor Location
>
>
> Thanks Jae,
>
> I'm trying to decide before I drill the hole and prior to final assembly.
>
> Tom
>
> Do not archive
>
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|