RV10-List Digest Archive

Mon 12/31/12


Total Messages Posted: 16



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 02:23 AM - Re: N433RV First Flight (Patrick Pulis)
     2. 02:39 AM - Re: N433RV First Flight (Bob Leffler)
     3. 03:36 AM - Re: Re: N433RV First Flight (Jesse Saint)
     4. 07:21 AM - Re: Overhead Console Final Installation & TCAS Antenna Installa (bill.peyton)
     5. 07:32 AM - Re: Re: Overhead Console Final Installation & TCAS Antenna Installa (Kelly McMullen)
     6. 08:35 AM - Re: Re: Overhead Console Final Installation & TCAS Antenna Install (Carl Froehlich)
     7. 11:15 AM - Re: Re: Antennae Install (Carlos Trigo)
     8. 11:23 AM - Naca Vents (Rick Lark)
     9. 11:42 AM - Re: Naca Vents (bob-tcw)
    10. 11:50 AM - Re: Naca Vents (Geoff Combs)
    11. 11:53 AM - Re: Re: Antennae Install (bob-tcw)
    12. 12:11 PM - Re: Re: Antennae Install (Carl Froehlich)
    13. 12:43 PM - Re: Re: Antennae Install (Bob Leffler)
    14. 12:59 PM - Re: Naca Vents (Bob Leffler)
    15. 01:06 PM - Re: Naca Vents (Seano)
    16. 02:30 PM - Re: Antennae Install (Bob Turner)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:23:19 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: N433RV First Flight
    From: Patrick Pulis <rv10free2fly@yahoo.com.au>
    Well done Jay, Safe skies my friend. Warm regards Patrick On 31/12/2012, at 11:55 AM, "hotwheels" <jaybrinkmeyer@yahoo.com> wrote: > > N433RV RV-10 made her maiden flight on December 29th after nearly 9 years of building. > > My -10 is powered by a rebuilt Lyco IO-540, 2-blade Hartzell blended airfoil propeller, dual Light Speed electronic ignitions, dual B&C alternators and B&C starter. The panel includes Grand Rapids HXes and EIS, PS9000 Audio, Garmin 430W, SL30 and GTX330 xponder, TruTrak autopilot, Navworx UAT and a few steam gauges. It's a very nice ride. > > The plane has amazing performance. KFLY is at 6800' MSL and I was at pattern altitude before reaching the end of the runway. The controls were very responsive and the plane did exactly what I asked. I found that my -10 has a heavy left wing as has been reported by others. However, that should be easily remedied by adding some aileron trim. Speaking of trim, the Final Inspection document stated that "1/3 nose up travel" recommended for first flight. However, I found that to be way too much (50 lbs of sand in the baggage compartment for W&B). Neutral trim would have been a better choice - at least for me. > > My first flight was cut short due to a fuel issue after about 30 minutes. Fortunately, both pilot and plane made it safely back to the airport where I made a surprising good landing for an RV rookie. I can hardly wait to get back in the air after everything gets the once over. > > Thanks to my family who put up with riveting, cutting and dust in our garage... To the folks at Van's for providing a great design, to AlexD for quality transition training, to numerous EAA Tech Counselor visits and to my builder buddies (you know who you are!) and, of course, to tips provided by many of the folks on this list........ I couldn't have made the journey without lots of help from all of you! > > Cheers, > Jay > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=391255#391255 > > > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/img_0382_lr_671.jpg > > > > > > >


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:39:20 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: N433RV First Flight
    From: Bob Leffler <rv@thelefflers.com>
    Jay, Congrats on the first flight! I hope to be following you in another 6-8 weeks. I just have to wait to get this cast off my foot so I can finish final assembly. Bob Sent from my iPad On Dec 30, 2012, at 8:25 PM, "hotwheels" <jaybrinkmeyer@yahoo.com> wrote: > > N433RV RV-10 made her maiden flight on December 29th after nearly 9 years of building. > > My -10 is powered by a rebuilt Lyco IO-540, 2-blade Hartzell blended airfoil propeller, dual Light Speed electronic ignitions, dual B&C alternators and B&C starter. The panel includes Grand Rapids HXes and EIS, PS9000 Audio, Garmin 430W, SL30 and GTX330 xponder, TruTrak autopilot, Navworx UAT and a few steam gauges. It's a very nice ride. > > The plane has amazing performance. KFLY is at 6800' MSL and I was at pattern altitude before reaching the end of the runway. The controls were very responsive and the plane did exactly what I asked. I found that my -10 has a heavy left wing as has been reported by others. However, that should be easily remedied by adding some aileron trim. Speaking of trim, the Final Inspection document stated that "1/3 nose up travel" recommended for first flight. However, I found that to be way too much (50 lbs of sand in the baggage compartment for W&B). Neutral trim would have been a better choice - at least for me. > > My first flight was cut short due to a fuel issue after about 30 minutes. Fortunately, both pilot and plane made it safely back to the airport where I made a surprising good landing for an RV rookie. I can hardly wait to get back in the air after everything gets the once over. > > Thanks to my family who put up with riveting, cutting and dust in our garage... To the folks at Van's for providing a great design, to AlexD for quality transition training, to numerous EAA Tech Counselor visits and to my builder buddies (you know who you are!) and, of course, to tips provided by many of the folks on this list........ I couldn't have made the journey without lots of help from all of you! > > Cheers, > Jay > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=391255#391255 > > > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/img_0382_lr_671.jpg > > > > > > >


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:36:20 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: N433RV First Flight
    From: Jesse Saint <jesse@saintaviation.com>
    Well, a loose fitting there would mean that with the boost pump off, there is only slight suction at that fitting, so the engine driven pump might have been sucking a little bit of air (maybe what caused the engine to quit on the runway. With the boost pump on you are the pressurizing the fuel at that fitting, which caused it to leak. It could be that it was sealing ok with a finger tight fitting and that the vibration of flight caused it to loosen. Torque Seal is a great thing to use for this purpose. Not as much for Anti Sabatoge as much for reminding us if we torqued it or not. That reminds me, I need to order some more of that stuff. Good thing you caught it when you did. I've noticed that's one reason it's really nice to have blue dye in the 100LL, because slow leaks in the system show themselves. Glad it all turned out well. Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. jesse@itecusa.org www.itecusa.org www.mavericklsa.com C: 352-427-0285 O: 352-465-4545 F: 815-377-3694 Sent from my iPhone On Dec 30, 2012, at 11:20 PM, "hotwheels" <jaybrinkmeyer@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Sure... I'll share. In preparation for landing, I turned the electric fuel pump on and smelled fuel in the cockpit. Immediately turned off the fuel pump and landed. Then engine stopped on the runway and I coasted off. > > Removed cowl and tunnel covers back at the hangar. The tunnel was dry. However, running the electric fuel pump resulted in fuel leakage at the low pressure input fitting to the mechanical engine driven pump. It was loose. This after numerous engine starts, taxi tests and run ups without leakage. > > What's interesting is that nothing was obviously amiss until running the electric pump. Maybe someone else has ideas about why that might be... > > Just goes to show the value of putting a wrench on as much as possible before flight and, of course, mentally preparing for engine out events. > > Regards, > Jay > > > > [quote="bgill1(at)mediastreamus.n"]Way to go. I know the feeling. > > Any comments you care to share on the "fuel issue"? I always learn a lot from what other folks find. > > Byron > N253RV Flying (just need some paint) > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=391262#391262 > > > > > > > > > >


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:21:32 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Overhead Console Final Installation & TCAS Antenna Installa
    From: "bill.peyton" <peyton.b@sbcglobal.net>
    The Garmin GNS 430W and the G3X install manuals do not specify a bonding nor a ground plane for the GPS antenna. I suspect that this may have been revised for the GTN manuals to add the requirement. I have not seen any issues with my installation, which does not have a ground plane on either GPS antenna. I found an old GPS antenna and decided to sacrifice it. Below is a photo of the inside of this certified GPS antenna. The actual antenna element is etched on the top surface of a copper clad ceramic wafer which has a copper surface covering the entire underside (not visible in photo). The combination of the thickness of the ceramic and the size of the element determines the electrical properties of the antenna. This type of design is called a "patch antenna". Under the patch antenna resides the low noise amplifier. You can see that the antenna itself is mounted approximately 1/2" above what might be considered the base. Any additional ground plane that may be added by mounting this antenna to the metallic skin of the aircraft would "appear" to this patch antenna to reside 1/2" above the actual patch antenna ground plane. This antenna is an old design, and is probably not representative of the new low noise semi-conductor technology nor GPS antenna design. The noise figure and gain of the newer antennas is so far improved over the some of the original designs that it is hardly a fair comparison. But I couldn't resist taking it apart! Bill -------- Bill WA0SYV Aviation Partners, LLC Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=391273#391273 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscn0026_571.jpg


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:32:44 AM PST US
    From: Kelly McMullen <kellym@aviating.com>
    Subject: Re: Overhead Console Final Installation & TCAS Antenna
    Installa The ground plane recommendation is in the install instructions for the GA35 antenna, which was released with the 430W upgrade. Whether the instructions were changed later to add the ground plane recommendation, I don't know, as I obtained my antenna this fall. One poster on VAF mentioned that he put his antenna forward of the firewall with minimal ground plane, then added bigger ground plane later and saw noticeable performance improvement. So yes, it works without one, but apparently works better with one. On 12/31/2012 8:20 AM, bill.peyton wrote: > > The Garmin GNS 430W and the G3X install manuals do not specify a bonding nor a ground plane for the GPS antenna. I suspect that this may have been revised for the GTN manuals to add the requirement. I have not seen any issues with my installation, which does not have a ground plane on either GPS antenna. > > ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:35:26 AM PST US
    From: "Carl Froehlich" <carl.froehlich@verizon.net>
    Subject: Re: Overhead Console Final Installation & TCAS Antenna
    Install This is the second RV where I took the easy way for GPS and XM antenna mounts - on top of the glare shield. I do take some black cloth and wrap the typically white antennas to eliminate glare off the windshield. This mounting location has worked perfectly for both RVs (GX-60 and Garmin 396 in the RV-8A, Garmin GTN-650 and Dynon SkyView GPS in the RV-10). Considering the ever increasing rate of change in avionics, the odds are high that the RVs will go through panel upgrades several times during their life (the RV-8A is 10 years old and on its third panel mod - the fourth will come next year or so). As such, maintaining ease of avionic and associated panel modification is an important design element for me. External GPS antenna mounting tends to go against this principle. My external antennas on the RV-10 are all on the belly; two bent whip communications, a blade transponder and a blade ADSB antenna. Carl -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Kelly McMullen Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 10:32 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Overhead Console Final Installation & TCAS Antenna Installa The ground plane recommendation is in the install instructions for the GA35 antenna, which was released with the 430W upgrade. Whether the instructions were changed later to add the ground plane recommendation, I don't know, as I obtained my antenna this fall. One poster on VAF mentioned that he put his antenna forward of the firewall with minimal ground plane, then added bigger ground plane later and saw noticeable performance improvement. So yes, it works without one, but apparently works better with one. On 12/31/2012 8:20 AM, bill.peyton wrote: > --> <peyton.b@sbcglobal.net> > > The Garmin GNS 430W and the G3X install manuals do not specify a bonding nor a ground plane for the GPS antenna. I suspect that this may have been revised for the GTN manuals to add the requirement. I have not seen any issues with my installation, which does not have a ground plane on either GPS antenna. > > ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:15:48 AM PST US
    From: "Carlos Trigo" <trigo@mail.telepac.pt>
    Subject: Re: Antennae Install
    Carl Where exactly in your RV-10 belly did you install the antennae? Below the front seats? Below the feet of the rear passengers? Thanks Carlos -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Carl Froehlich Sent: segunda-feira, 31 de Dezembro de 2012 16:35 Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Overhead Console Final Installation & TCAS Antenna Install --> <carl.froehlich@verizon.net> This is the second RV where I took the easy way for GPS and XM antenna mounts - on top of the glare shield. I do take some black cloth and wrap the typically white antennas to eliminate glare off the windshield. This mounting location has worked perfectly for both RVs (GX-60 and Garmin 396 in the RV-8A, Garmin GTN-650 and Dynon SkyView GPS in the RV-10). Considering the ever increasing rate of change in avionics, the odds are high that the RVs will go through panel upgrades several times during their life (the RV-8A is 10 years old and on its third panel mod - the fourth will come next year or so). As such, maintaining ease of avionic and associated panel modification is an important design element for me. External GPS antenna mounting tends to go against this principle. My external antennas on the RV-10 are all on the belly; two bent whip communications, a blade transponder and a blade ADSB antenna. Carl -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Kelly McMullen Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 10:32 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Overhead Console Final Installation & TCAS Antenna Installa The ground plane recommendation is in the install instructions for the GA35 antenna, which was released with the 430W upgrade. Whether the instructions were changed later to add the ground plane recommendation, I don't know, as I obtained my antenna this fall. One poster on VAF mentioned that he put his antenna forward of the firewall with minimal ground plane, then added bigger ground plane later and saw noticeable performance improvement. So yes, it works without one, but apparently works better with one. On 12/31/2012 8:20 AM, bill.peyton wrote: > --> <peyton.b@sbcglobal.net> > > The Garmin GNS 430W and the G3X install manuals do not specify a > bonding nor a ground plane for the GPS antenna. I suspect that this may have been revised for the GTN manuals to add the requirement. I have not seen any issues with my installation, which does not have a ground plane on either GPS antenna. > > ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:23:47 AM PST US
    Subject: Naca Vents
    From: Rick Lark <larkrv10@gmail.com>
    Hi all, I'm getting ready to cut the NACA vent hole(s) in my tail cone for an overhead console and am wondering if I really need 2 vents. Seems to me I've read comments about one vent being sufficient. Also being in Southern Ontario, the summer temps aren't sustained for nearly as long as those of you south of the Mason Dixon line, thus the reason I question if 2 are needed. Any and all opinions are welcome. Happy New Year to everyone. Rick #40956 Southampton, Ont


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:42:50 AM PST US
    From: "bob-tcw" <rnewman@tcwtech.com>
    Subject: Re: Naca Vents
    Rick, I went with just one Naca scoop in the tail cone area (just behind baggage door) feeding my overhead console. It has provided plenty of air from overhead. There=99s a few pictures in my web album starting with this one: https://picasaweb.google.com/102955683430141812381/CoolingFans#5576300260 864810306 Bob Newman N541RV From: Rick Lark Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 2:23 PM Subject: RV10-List: Naca Vents Hi all, I'm getting ready to cut the NACA vent hole(s) in my tail cone for an overhead console and am wondering if I really need 2 vents. Seems to me I've read comments about one vent being sufficient. Also being in Southern Ontario, the summer temps aren't sustained for nearly as long as those of you south of the Mason Dixon line, thus the reason I question if 2 are needed. Any and all opinions are welcome. Happy New Year to everyone. Rick #40956 Southampton, Ont


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:50:42 AM PST US
    From: "Geoff Combs" <g.combs@aerosportmodeling.com>
    Subject: Naca Vents
    Rick I would still put 2 in. I have 2 and in the summer you get some air from them when taxiing. It is not a lot but sure helps when it is hot. You can always close the vents or for you put in the NACA control valve from Aerosport Products. You can shut the whole system down in the winter with the controller and open it up in the summer. Its easier to do it now then later. It will take maybe 1 hour more for the extra vent. FWIW Geoff Combs Aerosport www.aerosportproducts.com _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rick Lark Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 2:23 PM Subject: RV10-List: Naca Vents Hi all, I'm getting ready to cut the NACA vent hole(s) in my tail cone for an overhead console and am wondering if I really need 2 vents. Seems to me I've read comments about one vent being sufficient. Also being in Southern Ontario, the summer temps aren't sustained for nearly as long as those of you south of the Mason Dixon line, thus the reason I question if 2 are needed. Any and all opinions are welcome. Happy New Year to everyone. Rick #40956 Southampton, Ont


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:53:28 AM PST US
    From: "bob-tcw" <rnewman@tcwtech.com>
    Subject: Re: Antennae Install
    Carl, On my -10, my two bent whip com antennas are under the rear passenger seats, my ADS-b UAT blade antenna is about 3 feet back from the rear baggage bulkhead, my transponder antenna is about 1 foot back from the firewall and pops up into the tunnel. My 3 gps antennas are mounted to a metal plate about 8 inch wide and 12 inches long, this plate of antennas is hidden in my overhead console, with the antennas looking through fiberglass top. (note I took signal strength readings with this plate of antennas inside the aircraft as described and out of the aircraft with no fiberglass between the antennas and the satellites, absolutely no change in signal strengths) Bob Newman N541RV -----Original Message----- From: Carlos Trigo Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 2:16 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Antennae Install Carl Where exactly in your RV-10 belly did you install the antennae? Below the front seats? Below the feet of the rear passengers? Thanks Carlos -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Carl Froehlich Sent: segunda-feira, 31 de Dezembro de 2012 16:35 Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Overhead Console Final Installation & TCAS Antenna Install --> <carl.froehlich@verizon.net> This is the second RV where I took the easy way for GPS and XM antenna mounts - on top of the glare shield. I do take some black cloth and wrap the typically white antennas to eliminate glare off the windshield. This mounting location has worked perfectly for both RVs (GX-60 and Garmin 396 in the RV-8A, Garmin GTN-650 and Dynon SkyView GPS in the RV-10). Considering the ever increasing rate of change in avionics, the odds are high that the RVs will go through panel upgrades several times during their life (the RV-8A is 10 years old and on its third panel mod - the fourth will come next year or so). As such, maintaining ease of avionic and associated panel modification is an important design element for me. External GPS antenna mounting tends to go against this principle. My external antennas on the RV-10 are all on the belly; two bent whip communications, a blade transponder and a blade ADSB antenna. Carl -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Kelly McMullen Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 10:32 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Overhead Console Final Installation & TCAS Antenna Installa The ground plane recommendation is in the install instructions for the GA35 antenna, which was released with the 430W upgrade. Whether the instructions were changed later to add the ground plane recommendation, I don't know, as I obtained my antenna this fall. One poster on VAF mentioned that he put his antenna forward of the firewall with minimal ground plane, then added bigger ground plane later and saw noticeable performance improvement. So yes, it works without one, but apparently works better with one. On 12/31/2012 8:20 AM, bill.peyton wrote: > --> <peyton.b@sbcglobal.net> > > The Garmin GNS 430W and the G3X install manuals do not specify a > bonding nor a ground plane for the GPS antenna. I suspect that this may have been revised for the GTN manuals to add the requirement. I have not seen any issues with my installation, which does not have a ground plane on either GPS antenna. > > ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:11:58 PM PST US
    From: "Carl Froehlich" <carl.froehlich@verizon.net>
    Subject: Re: Antennae Install
    The transponder antenna is below the passenger's seat. Both communication antennas are mounted below the tunnel (but along the side edges of the tunnel, one left and one right). One just aft of the mid bell crank and the second one is mounted just aft of the rear seats. The are both positioned on the sides of the tunnel to preclude interference with the elevator push tubes. The ADSB blade antenna is mounted aft of the baggage compartment. I pick this location as I am mounting the ADSB receiver back there with it (Dynon unit), and it places it well away from the transponder antenna. All locations allow for access to the antennas for maintenance or replacement. Mounting antennas in areas like below the rear passenger's feet or seats is a problem as you will not have access to them - unless of course you add some access panels. Carl -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Carlos Trigo Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 2:16 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Antennae Install Carl Where exactly in your RV-10 belly did you install the antennae? Below the front seats? Below the feet of the rear passengers? Thanks Carlos -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Carl Froehlich Sent: segunda-feira, 31 de Dezembro de 2012 16:35 Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Overhead Console Final Installation & TCAS Antenna Install --> <carl.froehlich@verizon.net> This is the second RV where I took the easy way for GPS and XM antenna mounts - on top of the glare shield. I do take some black cloth and wrap the typically white antennas to eliminate glare off the windshield. This mounting location has worked perfectly for both RVs (GX-60 and Garmin 396 in the RV-8A, Garmin GTN-650 and Dynon SkyView GPS in the RV-10). Considering the ever increasing rate of change in avionics, the odds are high that the RVs will go through panel upgrades several times during their life (the RV-8A is 10 years old and on its third panel mod - the fourth will come next year or so). As such, maintaining ease of avionic and associated panel modification is an important design element for me. External GPS antenna mounting tends to go against this principle. My external antennas on the RV-10 are all on the belly; two bent whip communications, a blade transponder and a blade ADSB antenna. Carl -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Kelly McMullen Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 10:32 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Overhead Console Final Installation & TCAS Antenna Installa The ground plane recommendation is in the install instructions for the GA35 antenna, which was released with the 430W upgrade. Whether the instructions were changed later to add the ground plane recommendation, I don't know, as I obtained my antenna this fall. One poster on VAF mentioned that he put his antenna forward of the firewall with minimal ground plane, then added bigger ground plane later and saw noticeable performance improvement. So yes, it works without one, but apparently works better with one. On 12/31/2012 8:20 AM, bill.peyton wrote: > --> <peyton.b@sbcglobal.net> > > The Garmin GNS 430W and the G3X install manuals do not specify a > bonding nor a ground plane for the GPS antenna. I suspect that this may have been revised for the GTN manuals to add the requirement. I have not seen any issues with my installation, which does not have a ground plane on either GPS antenna. > > ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:43:17 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Antennae Install
    From: Bob Leffler <rv@thelefflers.com>
    My antenna on the bottom are very similar to Bob's. I also have a nav antenna under the tail. I have two gps antenna just behind the cabin cover and another two on the glare shield. Sent from my iPad On Dec 31, 2012, at 2:53 PM, "bob-tcw" <rnewman@tcwtech.com> wrote: > > Carl, On my -10, my two bent whip com antennas are under the rear passenger seats, my ADS-b UAT blade antenna is about 3 feet back from the rear baggage bulkhead, my transponder antenna is about 1 foot back from the firewall and pops up into the tunnel. > > My 3 gps antennas are mounted to a metal plate about 8 inch wide and 12 inches long, this plate of antennas is hidden in my overhead console, with the antennas looking through fiberglass top. (note I took signal strength readings with this plate of antennas inside the aircraft as described and out of the aircraft with no fiberglass between the antennas and the satellites, absolutely no change in signal strengths) > > Bob Newman > N541RV > > > -----Original Message----- From: Carlos Trigo > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 2:16 PM > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Antennae Install > > > Carl > > Where exactly in your RV-10 belly did you install the antennae? Below the > front seats? Below the feet of the rear passengers? > > Thanks > Carlos > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Carl Froehlich > Sent: segunda-feira, 31 de Dezembro de 2012 16:35 > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Overhead Console Final Installation & TCAS > Antenna Install > > --> <carl.froehlich@verizon.net> > > This is the second RV where I took the easy way for GPS and XM antenna > mounts - on top of the glare shield. I do take some black cloth and wrap > the typically white antennas to eliminate glare off the windshield. This > mounting location has worked perfectly for both RVs (GX-60 and Garmin 396 in > the RV-8A, Garmin GTN-650 and Dynon SkyView GPS in the RV-10). > > Considering the ever increasing rate of change in avionics, the odds are > high that the RVs will go through panel upgrades several times during their > life (the RV-8A is 10 years old and on its third panel mod - the fourth will > come next year or so). As such, maintaining ease of avionic and associated > panel modification is an important design element for me. External GPS > antenna mounting tends to go against this principle. > > My external antennas on the RV-10 are all on the belly; two bent whip > communications, a blade transponder and a blade ADSB antenna. > > Carl > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Kelly McMullen > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 10:32 AM > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Overhead Console Final Installation & TCAS > Antenna Installa > > > The ground plane recommendation is in the install instructions for the > GA35 antenna, which was released with the 430W upgrade. Whether the > instructions were changed later to add the ground plane recommendation, I > don't know, as I obtained my antenna this fall. > One poster on VAF mentioned that he put his antenna forward of the firewall > with minimal ground plane, then added bigger ground plane later and saw > noticeable performance improvement. So yes, it works without one, but > apparently works better with one. > > On 12/31/2012 8:20 AM, bill.peyton wrote: >> --> <peyton.b@sbcglobal.net> >> >> The Garmin GNS 430W and the G3X install manuals do not specify a >> bonding > nor a ground plane for the GPS antenna. I suspect that this may have been > revised for the GTN manuals to add the requirement. I have not seen any > issues with my installation, which does not have a ground plane on either > GPS antenna. > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:59:20 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Naca Vents
    From: Bob Leffler <rv@thelefflers.com>
    I put a pair of them in, along with an Aerosport Products vent controller. Like Geoff mentioned, in the air one is probably enough, but while taxiing y ou'll want them both wide open in the summer. You might drop Ivan an email and see what his experiences are in Guelph. Bob Sent from my iPad On Dec 31, 2012, at 2:23 PM, Rick Lark <larkrv10@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, I'm getting ready to cut the NACA vent hole(s) in my tail cone for an overhead console and am wondering if I really need 2 vents. Seems to me I've read comments about one vent being sufficient. Also being in Southern Ontario, the summer temps aren't sustained for nearly as long as those of y ou south of the Mason Dixon line, thus the reason I question if 2 are needed . > > Any and all opinions are welcome. Happy New Year to everyone. > > Rick > #40956 > Southampton, Ont > > > > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= >


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:06:04 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Naca Vents
    From: Seano <sean@braunandco.com>
    I have two in the back as well. I vote for two. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 31, 2012, at 13:58, Bob Leffler <rv@thelefflers.com> wrote: > I put a pair of them in, along with an Aerosport Products vent controller. Like Geoff mentioned, in the air one is probably enough, but while taxiin g you'll want them both wide open in the summer. > > You might drop Ivan an email and see what his experiences are in Guelph. > > Bob > > Sent from my iPad > > On Dec 31, 2012, at 2:23 PM, Rick Lark <larkrv10@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, I'm getting ready to cut the NACA vent hole(s) in my tail cone fo r an overhead console and am wondering if I really need 2 vents. Seems to m e I've read comments about one vent being sufficient. Also being in Souther n Ontario, the summer temps aren't sustained for nearly as long as those of y ou south of the Mason Dixon line, thus the reason I question if 2 are needed . >> >> Any and all opinions are welcome. Happy New Year to everyone. >> >> Rick >> #40956 >> Southampton, Ont >> >> >> >> >> >> ========================= ========= >> ctric.com >> >www.buildersbooks.com >> uilthelp.com >> matronics.com/contribution >> ========================= ========= >> ://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> ========================= ========= >> cs.com >> ========================= ========= >> > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= >


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:30:55 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Antennae Install
    From: "Bob Turner" <bobturner@alum.rpi.edu>
    Transponder under pilot seat. Com under passenger seat (yes, this is best done before installing the seat pan. I put a doubler with nutplates, and ran the coax, before closing it up.). GPS antenna behind the baggage bulkhead, on top of the tailcone. Archer wingtip for VOR/ LOC. Putting the GPS on top of the cabin looked best to me from a reception point of view, but worst as far as drag is concerned. Comments? Once in a while I have trouble with ATC when I am on the ground using the belly antenna. For those times my #2 com antenna, an Archer clone in the other wing tip, works better. In the air the belly whip is better. -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=391301#391301




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv10-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV10-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv10-list
  • Browse RV10-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --