Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 10:59 AM - Re: RV10 door seals (Ed Godfrey)
2. 07:19 PM - Skyview 5.1 to 5.0 Downgrade Successful... (Matt Dralle)
3. 09:12 PM - Re: RV10 door seals (rv10flyer)
4. 09:27 PM - Re: Rough engine (rv10flyer)
5. 11:22 PM - Re: Skyview 5.1 to 5.0 Downgrade Successful... (Andrew Long - AANet)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: RV10 door seals |
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Skyview 5.1 to 5.0 Downgrade Successful... |
Dear Listers,
Good news. I was able to roll back to Skyview 5.0.0 using a special roll-back
file supplied Mike Schofield at Dynon and carefully followed a procedure he outlined
to accomplish the task at hand. I am again getting an EMS data feed from
the Skyview to the VP-200. I haven't flown or started the engine yet, but
I flipped on the Boost pump and saw fuel pressure so that's a good sign.
Hopefully Vertical Power will have an update for the VP-200 soon...
I had a long phone conversation with Mike Schofield, Marketing Manager at Dynon
about the trials and tribulations of late. He was sympathetic to the plight
of those of us utilizing their EMS protocol, but didn't seem like they were planning
on really doing anything procedurally any different in the future with
respect to not compromising the data integrity of the data format for devices
such as the VP-200 in the field. I indicated that as a developer of products
that might potentially use those protocols, I would be uncomfortable choosing
to use those data feeds because of the lack of commitment to their stability and
continuity by Dynon. I guess I got my point across. He went on to say that
they hadn't intended for the protocol to be used by autonomous devices like
the VP-200, but rather foresaw it simply being used as raw data that would be
captured and used for post-analysis like with a spreadsheet. I countered that
even in those applications, some consistency of format is expected and consumers
of the data might very will write scripts and/or code to interpret the data
and would be put off by constant format changes.
Anyway, Dynon is a small company and they've got a lot on their plate and a lot
of customers asking for a lot of different things. I think they get it, but
it sometimes takes events like this to show them exactly why these things are
important.
-
Matt Dralle
RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen"
http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log
http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log
http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel
Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap...
RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer"
http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log
Status: 140+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: RV10 door seals |
Yep, go with the McMaster Carr seal.
--------
Wayne G.
SB 12/01/2009-12/01/2011
TT= 97.6
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=393755#393755
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Rough engine |
I am with the loose nut, bolt, safety wire ingestion or servo mechanical. Check
your alternate air hardware/rivets. If you don't find anything with a thorough
inspection ...don't leave the pattern for a while. Let us know.
--------
Wayne G.
SB 12/01/2009-12/01/2011
TT= 97.6
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=393757#393757
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Skyview 5.1 to 5.0 Downgrade Successful... |
Hi All,
I would also like to add that here in Australia there is a big discussion
around IFR avionics, certification and experimental avionics.
One of these areas is the software development protocols. It would be of
benefit that a standard protocol was adapted that may enhance the ability of
these instruments to be looked at more favourably when it comes to the
approval processes in different countries.
My view looking at the world at the moment is that Oz is not going to be the
last to deal with these issues and the better they are managed, the better
the outcomes.
PS: This is in no way a dispersion on development, just how we can manage
the perception of "Experimental"
Andrew.
www.ozrv10.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Matt Dralle
Sent: Thursday, 7 February 2013 2:18 PM
Subject: RV10-List: Skyview 5.1 to 5.0 Downgrade Successful...
Dear Listers,
Good news. I was able to roll back to Skyview 5.0.0 using a special
roll-back file supplied Mike Schofield at Dynon and carefully followed a
procedure he outlined to accomplish the task at hand. I am again getting an
EMS data feed from the Skyview to the VP-200. I haven't flown or started
the engine yet, but I flipped on the Boost pump and saw fuel pressure so
that's a good sign.
Hopefully Vertical Power will have an update for the VP-200 soon...
I had a long phone conversation with Mike Schofield, Marketing Manager at
Dynon about the trials and tribulations of late. He was sympathetic to the
plight of those of us utilizing their EMS protocol, but didn't seem like
they were planning on really doing anything procedurally any different in
the future with respect to not compromising the data integrity of the data
format for devices such as the VP-200 in the field. I indicated that as a
developer of products that might potentially use those protocols, I would be
uncomfortable choosing to use those data feeds because of the lack of
commitment to their stability and continuity by Dynon. I guess I got my
point across. He went on to say that they hadn't intended for the protocol
to be used by autonomous devices like the VP-200, but rather foresaw it
simply being used as raw data that would be captured and used for
post-analysis like with a spreadsheet. I countered that even in those
applications, some consistency of for!
mat is expected and consumers of the data might very will write scripts
and/or code to interpret the data and would be put off by constant format
changes.
Anyway, Dynon is a small company and they've got a lot on their plate and a
lot of customers asking for a lot of different things. I think they get it,
but it sometimes takes events like this to show them exactly why these
things are important.
-
Matt Dralle
RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen"
http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log
http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log
http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel
Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap...
RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer"
http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log
Status: 140+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer
Mode
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|