Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 02:58 AM - static port (Rob Kermanj)
2. 05:20 AM - Re: Gear leg stiffeners (Don McDonald)
3. 05:24 AM - Re: Baggage Area Weight (Don McDonald)
4. 06:26 AM - Re: static port (johngoodman)
5. 06:34 AM - Re: The Harbor Freight 2 Ton Shop Crane (johngoodman)
6. 06:35 AM - Re: Re: Gear leg stiffeners (Pascal)
7. 07:02 AM - Re: Re: static port (Rob Kermanj)
8. 07:44 AM - Re: Re: static port (Bob Leffler)
9. 08:24 AM - Re: Re: static port (Rob Kermanj)
10. 08:39 AM - Re: N880EE Exposed (Rick Lark)
11. 09:02 AM - Re: N880EE Exposed (Robin Marks)
12. 09:13 AM - Airspeed Indicator (Carlos Trigo)
13. 09:33 AM - Re: Airspeed Indicator (Robin Marks)
14. 12:10 PM - Re: Airspeed Indicator (davidsoutpost@comcast.net)
15. 12:31 PM - Mounting PC680 on firewall (rvdave)
16. 01:07 PM - Re: Mounting PC680 on firewall (Tim Olson)
17. 01:26 PM - Re: Mounting PC680 on firewall (Carl Froehlich)
18. 01:39 PM - Re: Re: static port (Carl Froehlich)
19. 01:46 PM - Re: N880EE Exposed (Rick Lark)
20. 01:52 PM - Re: static port (Rick Lark)
21. 02:30 PM - Re: N880EE Exposed (Robin Marks)
22. 02:39 PM - Re: Mounting PC680 on firewall (Robin Marks)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
anyone has used the static port fitting from Cleveland Tools http://www.cleavelandtool.com/prodinfo.asp?number=SPF140#.UR9keKUhdic?
if so, any idea if they are accurate?
Thanks
Rob.
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Gear leg stiffeners |
Bruce, it's not Van's tire, it's the tubes.=C2- Spend the bucks and get L
eak Stop tubes.
Don McDonald
--- On Fri, 2/15/13, Bruce Johnson <bruce1hwjohnson@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Bruce Johnson <bruce1hwjohnson@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: RV10-List: Gear leg stiffeners
Mine is about 45 mph on take off and landing, taxi is fine. And it shakes,
I almost aborted my take off this morning. When I first started flying it I
had heard about the slow leaks of the Van's tire and tried putting slime i
n them, that was fun. About 35 to 50 it gave a very interesting ride, needl
ess to say taking the slime out was way harder than putting it in. Lesson l
earned=C2-
From: Pascal <rv10flyer@live.com>
To: rv10-list@matronics.com
=0A Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: RV10-List: Gear leg stiffeners
=0A=0A=0A=0A=0ABruce;=0AI just had the same situation last week. I added so
me air to the front tire =0Aand verified the torque was right on the fork n
ut, but for some reason the plane =0Ashakes at a certain speed when I taxi
now. I thought it was the taxiway, but =0Athan it occurred to me that I hav
e been over the same taxiway in the past =0Awithout an issue, so I don
=99t know why it does it now, no issue on takeoff or =0Alanding, only wh
en I do a taxi at a job pace.=0A=C2-=0A=0A=0A=C2-=0A=0AFrom: Bruce John
son =0ASent: Friday, February 15, 2013 1:04 PM=0ATo: rv10-list@matronics.co
m =0ASubject: Re: RV10-List: Gear leg stiffeners=0A=C2-=0A=0A=0AI'll doub
le check, but it sure felt =0Alike it was the mains. Like I said never happ
ened before =0A=C2-=0A=0A=0A=0A=0AFrom: Linn =0A<flying-nut@cfl.rr.com>
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 1:33 =0APM
Subject: Re: RV10-List: Gear =0Aleg stiffeners
=0A=C2-=0A=0A=0AYou might have nosegear shimmy ..... easy =0Afor someone
on the ground to see.=C2- If so, just tighten up the nose fork nut =0Aso
that a spring scale reads 25-30 Lbs when pulled at the axle.=C2- You may
=0Aneed to add Belleville washers for more dampening.=C2- The washers 'we
ar in' a =0Alittle after initial tightening.
Linn
On 2/15/2013 3:24 PM, Bruce =0AJohnson wrote:
=0A=0A =0A Does =0A anybody have a picture handy of the wood stiffeners
I have heard about?? I =0A have got 87 hrs on 151BJ and have never had a p
roblem until today. Full fuel, =0A two 200lb guys and wow what a shake. I
dropped my passenger and still had a =0A shake and then landed without one
. Took off again and it was just a minute =0A shake, landed with none. Wei
rd after all these take offs =0A and landings for it to start now. I am go
ing to pull the fairings off and =0A check for other things, but while I a
m at it I might put the stiffeners on. =0A Thanks in advance =0A
=0A Do not =0A archive=0A Bruce =0A Johnson=0A=0A=0A=0A No virus found
in this message.
Checked =0A by AVG - www.avg.com
02/15/13
< font>
=0A=0Ahref="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matr
onics.com/Navigator?RV10-List=0Ahref="http://forums.matronics.com">http:/
/forums.matronics.com=0Ahref="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http
://www.matronics.com/c=0A=0A=0A=0A http://www.matronics.com/Navi="_blank"
==============0A=0A
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Baggage Area Weight |
It's really a non-issue anyway.... unless you're loading steel or lead back
there, you'll run out of room before you exceed either weight limit.- Th
e baggage area can easily support 200+ pounds...... having spent some time
back there myself...(during the build!). it's more of a weight and balance
safety concern.
--- On Fri, 2/15/13, Bob Turner <bobturner@alum.rpi.edu> wrote:
From: Bob Turner <bobturner@alum.rpi.edu>
Subject: RV10-List: Baggage Area Weight
The paperwork from Vans that came with my final kit recommended a maximum o
f 150 lbs in the baggage area.
But I see Vans' web site now says 100 lbs maximum.
Anyone know when this change happened? Or why?
Bob
--------
Bob Turner
RV-10 QB
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394373#394373
le, List Admin.
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Don't see why it wouldn't. Looks fine to me.
John
--------
#40572 Phase One complete and flying.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394404#394404
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: The Harbor Freight 2 Ton Shop Crane |
Two Ton Crane? I thought they were One Ton Cranes - 2000 pounds.
John
--------
#40572 Phase One complete and flying.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394405#394405
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Gear leg stiffeners |
sounds like the situation I was in, hadn't flown in weeks. and it was about
15 kts when it started.
I guess I need to go taxi around and get it all rounded out again!
Thanks for the feedback!
-----Original Message-----
From: rv10flyer
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 9:57 PM
Subject: RV10-List: Re: Gear leg stiffeners
Occasionally I get a nose wheel fore-aft shimmy around 15 kts GS. If my
plane sits in one place more than 10 days, Van's tires get flat spots which
can induce resonance in the round gear legs. I know my tires are out of
round by 1/4" and have Desser retreads in stock when I get a few more hours
on these.
Fly more.
--------
Wayne G.
SB 12/01/2009-12/01/2011
TT= 97.6
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394398#394398
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I thought that I read on this forum that some give erroneous pressures because
they project too far out. Although I could not find the conversation in the archives.
Do not archive.
Rob Kermanj
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 16, 2013, at 9:25 AM, "johngoodman" <johngoodman@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> Don't see why it wouldn't. Looks fine to me.
> John
>
> --------
> #40572 Phase One complete and flying.
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394404#394404
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 8
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I believe that Tim has a write up on his site. If I recall, too flat was the issue.
I'm at the hangar with out a good Internet connection to validate my memory.
Bob
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 16, 2013, at 10:06 AM, Rob Kermanj <flysrv10@gmail.com> wrote:
I thought that I read on this forum that some give erroneous pressures because
they project too far out. Although I could not find the conversation in the archives.
Do not archive.
Rob Kermanj
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 16, 2013, at 9:25 AM, "johngoodman" <johngoodman@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> Don't see why it wouldn't. Looks fine to me.
> John
>
> --------
> #40572 Phase One complete and flying.
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394404#394404
Message 9
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Thanks. I will check it out.
do not archive
On Feb 16, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Bob Leffler <rv@thelefflers.com> wrote:
>
> I believe that Tim has a write up on his site. If I recall, too flat was the
issue. I'm at the hangar with out a good Internet connection to validate my memory.
>
> Bob
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Feb 16, 2013, at 10:06 AM, Rob Kermanj <flysrv10@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> I thought that I read on this forum that some give erroneous pressures because
they project too far out. Although I could not find the conversation in the
archives.
>
> Do not archive.
>
> Rob Kermanj
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Feb 16, 2013, at 9:25 AM, "johngoodman" <johngoodman@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> Don't see why it wouldn't. Looks fine to me.
>> John
>>
>> --------
>> #40572 Phase One complete and flying.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Read this topic online here:
>>
>> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394404#394404
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 10
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: N880EE Exposed |
Looking good Robin. Are goinf g to bring the -8 to SnF or Oshkosh?
Rick
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Robin Marks <robin@painttheweb.com> wrote
:
> RV List****
>
> I recently posted a First Flight on the Vans site and VAF. I thought I
> would share it with those on this list that didn=92t already know about 8
5.
> ****
>
> Robin****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> http://www.vansairforce.com/community/showthread.php?p=744277****
>
> ** **
>
> http://www.vansaircraft.com/public/first-flights.htm****
>
> ** **
>
> *More photos can be seen at:*
> http://www.painttheweb.com/painttheweb/RV-8A/****
>
> *HD Video can be seen at:*
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJ912gZyQ0U&feature=share&list=UU33R
vUl-OACUdX3XIljn26w
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> *
>
===========
===========
===========
===========
> *
>
>
Message 11
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: N880EE Exposed |
Not SnF for sure. Schedule does not allow it this year. OSH is a possibilit
y but the 10 is so much more comfortable and if I go I may bring some frien
ds which again means the 10 so the answer is I don't really know just yet.
The up side is if I do bring the 10 people can check out my Showplanes cowl
. My 2013 calendar is loading up quickly.
Hope to be at OSH 13 with 2 seats or 4,
Robin
Rick Lark <larkrv10@gmail.com> wrote:
Looking good Robin. Are goinf g to bring the -8 to SnF or Oshkosh?
Rick
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Robin Marks <robin@painttheweb.com<mailto
:robin@painttheweb.com>> wrote:
RV List
I recently posted a First Flight on the Vans site and VAF. I thought I woul
d share it with those on this list that didn=92t already know about 85.
Robin
http://www.vansairforce.com/community/showthread.php?p=744277
http://www.vansaircraft.com/public/first-flights.htm
More photos can be seen at:
http://www.painttheweb.com/painttheweb/RV-8A/
HD Video can be seen at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJ912gZyQ0U&feature=share&list=UU33RvU
l-OACUdX3XIljn26w
get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
tp://forums.matronics.com
_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
Message 12
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Airspeed Indicator |
Guys
We are going to install an Airspeed Indicator from Van's as a back-up in our
instrument panel.
Those of you who also have one ASI in your panel, which one did you choose,
with the Knots in the inner scale or the outer scale?
Carlos
Message 13
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Airspeed Indicator |
Carlos,
On my 8A I installed the 3.125" Gemini EFIS with its own small backup batte
ry supply (not the TT battery we used the TCW unit). Instead of just giving
Airspeed you get a full 6 pack plus more in the unit. Works great and a so
lution for a lot of info in a small format. No way would I use individual c
omponents at this point in avionics development.
Robin
http://www.trutrakflightsystems.com/products/Gemini_PFD.html
[Gemini ADI]
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@m
atronics.com] On Behalf Of Carlos Trigo
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2013 9:13 AM
Subject: RV10-List: Airspeed Indicator
Guys
We are going to install an Airspeed Indicator from Van's as a back-up in ou
r instrument panel.
Those of you who also have one ASI in your panel, which one did you choose,
with the Knots in the inner scale or the outer scale?
Carlos
Message 14
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Airspeed Indicator |
Message 15
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Mounting PC680 on firewall |
Looking to mount second battery on firewall with aluminum tray from Hawker. Thinking
about letting bottom of tray/battery rest on engine mount with baffle material
on mount. Anyone foresee a problem or better location?
--------
Dave Ford
RV6 flying
RV10 building
Cadillac, MI
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394420#394420
Attachments:
http://forums.matronics.com//files/battery_b_948.jpg
http://forums.matronics.com//files/battery_a_133.jpg
Message 16
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Mounting PC680 on firewall |
I'd never do it.
Tim
On Feb 16, 2013, at 2:27 PM, "rvdave" <davidbf@centurytel.net> wrote:
>
> Looking to mount second battery on firewall with aluminum tray from Hawker.
Thinking about letting bottom of tray/battery rest on engine mount with baffle
material on mount. Anyone foresee a problem or better location?
>
> --------
> Dave Ford
> RV6 flying
> RV10 building
> Cadillac, MI
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394420#394420
>
>
>
>
> Attachments:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com//files/battery_b_948.jpg
> http://forums.matronics.com//files/battery_a_133.jpg
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 17
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Mounting PC680 on firewall |
I modified the stock battery mount to hold two PC625 batteries (batteries
are mounted at 90 degrees to the axis of the plane (back to back with a 1/4"
spacer), and both are held down by the one stock battery clamp). The PC625
has a little more CCA power than the PC680, a pound lighter and has a better
form factor for this application.
The batteries normally operate in parallel, but are split in the event of a
component failure (e.g. alternator). When split half the panel runs on the
one, the other half on the other, or both sides can run on one or the other
battery in the event a battery (or more likely master solenoid) itself
failed.
Carl
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of rvdave
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2013 3:28 PM
Subject: RV10-List: Mounting PC680 on firewall
Looking to mount second battery on firewall with aluminum tray from Hawker.
Thinking about letting bottom of tray/battery rest on engine mount with
baffle material on mount. Anyone foresee a problem or better location?
--------
Dave Ford
RV6 flying
RV10 building
Cadillac, MI
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394420#394420
Attachments:
http://forums.matronics.com//files/battery_b_948.jpg
http://forums.matronics.com//files/battery_a_133.jpg
Message 18
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Yep - too flat is the problem.
I used a couple of 3/16 AN470 rivets with a 1/16 hole drilled through the
head and the rivet shank. I made a 5/8" diameter x 1/4" thick aluminum ring
(disc with a 3/16" hole drill in the center) as a backing plate to the
rivet. Epoxy the rivet and backing ring to the inside skin. Once set glue
on the static line over the rivet shank. No fittings required or
desired.
This solved the static error I had on the 8A (I was using a first generation
Cleaveland port), and on the 10 works perfectly as well.
Get a dozen or so of the rivets as it takes a couple of tries to get the
hole drill right in the center of the shank. You want a rivet shank an inch
or so long.
Carl
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bob Leffler
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2013 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: static port
I believe that Tim has a write up on his site. If I recall, too flat was
the issue. I'm at the hangar with out a good Internet connection to validate
my memory.
Bob
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 16, 2013, at 10:06 AM, Rob Kermanj <flysrv10@gmail.com> wrote:
I thought that I read on this forum that some give erroneous pressures
because they project too far out. Although I could not find the conversation
in the archives.
Do not archive.
Rob Kermanj
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 16, 2013, at 9:25 AM, "johngoodman" <johngoodman@earthlink.net>
wrote:
> --> <johngoodman@earthlink.net>
>
> Don't see why it wouldn't. Looks fine to me.
> John
>
> --------
> #40572 Phase One complete and flying.
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394404#394404
Message 19
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: N880EE Exposed |
Let me try that again, Robin are you going to attend either SnF or
Airventure??
I'd sure like to see the RV8
Rick
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Rick Lark <larkrv10@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looking good Robin. Are goinf g to bring the -8 to SnF or Oshkosh?
>
> Rick
>
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Robin Marks <robin@painttheweb.com>wrot
e:
>
>> RV List****
>>
>> I recently posted a First Flight on the Vans site and VAF. I thought I
>> would share it with those on this list that didn=92t already know about
85.
>> ****
>>
>> Robin****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> http://www.vansairforce.com/community/showthread.php?p=744277****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> http://www.vansaircraft.com/public/first-flights.htm****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *More photos can be seen at:*
>> http://www.painttheweb.com/painttheweb/RV-8A/****
>>
>> *HD Video can be seen at:*
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJ912gZyQ0U&feature=share&list=UU33
RvUl-OACUdX3XIljn26w
>> ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *
>>
===========
===========
===========
===========
>> *
>>
>>
>
Message 20
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Rob or anyone else. I have a pair of the Cleveland ports I bought but
ended up using Safe Air instead. If anyone wants them for the cost of the
postage, they're yours...
Rick
#40956
Southampton, Ont
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 5:57 AM, Rob Kermanj <flysrv10@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> anyone has used the static port fitting from Cleveland Tools
> http://www.cleavelandtool.com/prodinfo.asp?number=SPF140#.UR9keKUhdic?
>
> if so, any idea if they are accurate?
>
> Thanks
> Rob.
>
>
Message 21
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Ill respond again...
Not SnF for sure. Schedule does not allow it this year. OSH is a possibilit
y but the 10 is so much more comfortable and if I go I may bring some frien
ds which again means the 10 so the answer is I don't really know just yet.
The up side is if I do bring the 10 people can check out my Showplanes cowl
. My 2013 calendar is loading up quickly.
Hope to be at OSH 13 with 2 seats or 4,
Robin
________________________________
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [owner-rv10-list-server@matronic
s.com] on behalf of Rick Lark [larkrv10@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2013 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: RV10-List: N880EE Exposed
Let me try that again, Robin are you going to attend either SnF or Airvent
ure??
I'd sure like to see the RV8
Rick
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Rick Lark <larkrv10@gmail.com<mailto:lark
rv10@gmail.com>> wrote:
Looking good Robin. Are goinf g to bring the -8 to SnF or Oshkosh?
Rick
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Robin Marks <robin@painttheweb.com<mailto
:robin@painttheweb.com>> wrote:
RV List
I recently posted a First Flight on the Vans site and VAF. I thought I woul
d share it with those on this list that didn=92t already know about 85.
Robin
http://www.vansairforce.com/community/showthread.php?p=744277
http://www.vansaircraft.com/public/first-flights.htm
More photos can be seen at:
http://www.painttheweb.com/painttheweb/RV-8A/
HD Video can be seen at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJ912gZyQ0U&feature=share&list=UU33RvU
l-OACUdX3XIljn26w
get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
tp://forums.matronics.com
_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
Message 22
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Mounting PC680 on firewall |
I'm with Tim. Keep it of the engine mount at a minimum.
Here is my dual battery set up. I have a 3rd (smaller) battery that exclusi
vely supports my D100 in case of a total electrical failure.
Robin
[cid:image003.jpg@01CE0C53.40C38F60]
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@m
atronics.com] On Behalf Of Carl Froehlich
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2013 1:25 PM
Subject: RE: RV10-List: Mounting PC680 on firewall
--> <carl.froehlich@verizon.net<mailto:carl.froehlich@verizon.net>>
I modified the stock battery mount to hold two PC625 batteries (batteries a
re mounted at 90 degrees to the axis of the plane (back to back with a 1/4"
spacer), and both are held down by the one stock battery clamp). The PC625
has a little more CCA power than the PC680, a pound lighter and has a bett
er form factor for this application.
The batteries normally operate in parallel, but are split in the event of a
component failure (e.g. alternator). When split half the panel runs on th
e one, the other half on the other, or both sides can run on one or the oth
er battery in the event a battery (or more likely master solenoid) itself f
ailed.
Carl
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com<mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@ma
tronics.com>
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of rvdave
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2013 3:28 PM
Subject: RV10-List: Mounting PC680 on firewall
vidbf@centurytel.net>>
Looking to mount second battery on firewall with aluminum tray from Hawker.
Thinking about letting bottom of tray/battery rest on engine mount with
baffle material on mount. Anyone foresee a problem or better location?
--------
Dave Ford
RV6 flying
RV10 building
Cadillac, MI
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394420#394420
Attachments:
http://forums.matronics.com//files/battery_b_948.jpg<http://forums.matronic
s.com/files/battery_b_948.jpg>
http://forums.matronics.com//files/battery_a_133.jpg<http://forums.matronic
s.com/files/battery_a_133.jpg>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|