RV10-List Digest Archive

Sat 02/16/13


Total Messages Posted: 22



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 02:58 AM - static port (Rob Kermanj)
     2. 05:20 AM - Re: Gear leg stiffeners (Don McDonald)
     3. 05:24 AM - Re: Baggage Area Weight (Don McDonald)
     4. 06:26 AM - Re: static port (johngoodman)
     5. 06:34 AM - Re: The Harbor Freight 2 Ton Shop Crane (johngoodman)
     6. 06:35 AM - Re: Re: Gear leg stiffeners (Pascal)
     7. 07:02 AM - Re: Re: static port (Rob Kermanj)
     8. 07:44 AM - Re: Re: static port (Bob Leffler)
     9. 08:24 AM - Re: Re: static port (Rob Kermanj)
    10. 08:39 AM - Re: N880EE Exposed (Rick Lark)
    11. 09:02 AM - Re: N880EE Exposed (Robin Marks)
    12. 09:13 AM - Airspeed Indicator (Carlos Trigo)
    13. 09:33 AM - Re: Airspeed Indicator (Robin Marks)
    14. 12:10 PM - Re: Airspeed Indicator (davidsoutpost@comcast.net)
    15. 12:31 PM - Mounting PC680 on firewall (rvdave)
    16. 01:07 PM - Re: Mounting PC680 on firewall (Tim Olson)
    17. 01:26 PM - Re: Mounting PC680 on firewall (Carl Froehlich)
    18. 01:39 PM - Re: Re: static port (Carl Froehlich)
    19. 01:46 PM - Re: N880EE Exposed (Rick Lark)
    20. 01:52 PM - Re: static port (Rick Lark)
    21. 02:30 PM - Re: N880EE Exposed (Robin Marks)
    22. 02:39 PM - Re: Mounting PC680 on firewall (Robin Marks)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:58:52 AM PST US
    From: Rob Kermanj <flysrv10@gmail.com>
    Subject: static port
    anyone has used the static port fitting from Cleveland Tools http://www.cleavelandtool.com/prodinfo.asp?number=SPF140#.UR9keKUhdic? if so, any idea if they are accurate? Thanks Rob.


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:20:55 AM PST US
    From: Don McDonald <building_partner@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Gear leg stiffeners
    Bruce, it's not Van's tire, it's the tubes.=C2- Spend the bucks and get L eak Stop tubes. Don McDonald --- On Fri, 2/15/13, Bruce Johnson <bruce1hwjohnson@yahoo.com> wrote: From: Bruce Johnson <bruce1hwjohnson@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Gear leg stiffeners Mine is about 45 mph on take off and landing, taxi is fine. And it shakes, I almost aborted my take off this morning. When I first started flying it I had heard about the slow leaks of the Van's tire and tried putting slime i n them, that was fun. About 35 to 50 it gave a very interesting ride, needl ess to say taking the slime out was way harder than putting it in. Lesson l earned=C2- From: Pascal <rv10flyer@live.com> To: rv10-list@matronics.com =0A Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 2:13 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Gear leg stiffeners =0A=0A=0A=0A=0ABruce;=0AI just had the same situation last week. I added so me air to the front tire =0Aand verified the torque was right on the fork n ut, but for some reason the plane =0Ashakes at a certain speed when I taxi now. I thought it was the taxiway, but =0Athan it occurred to me that I hav e been over the same taxiway in the past =0Awithout an issue, so I don =99t know why it does it now, no issue on takeoff or =0Alanding, only wh en I do a taxi at a job pace.=0A=C2-=0A=0A=0A=C2-=0A=0AFrom: Bruce John son =0ASent: Friday, February 15, 2013 1:04 PM=0ATo: rv10-list@matronics.co m =0ASubject: Re: RV10-List: Gear leg stiffeners=0A=C2-=0A=0A=0AI'll doub le check, but it sure felt =0Alike it was the mains. Like I said never happ ened before =0A=C2-=0A=0A=0A=0A=0AFrom: Linn =0A<flying-nut@cfl.rr.com> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 1:33 =0APM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Gear =0Aleg stiffeners =0A=C2-=0A=0A=0AYou might have nosegear shimmy ..... easy =0Afor someone on the ground to see.=C2- If so, just tighten up the nose fork nut =0Aso that a spring scale reads 25-30 Lbs when pulled at the axle.=C2- You may =0Aneed to add Belleville washers for more dampening.=C2- The washers 'we ar in' a =0Alittle after initial tightening. Linn On 2/15/2013 3:24 PM, Bruce =0AJohnson wrote: =0A=0A =0A Does =0A anybody have a picture handy of the wood stiffeners I have heard about?? I =0A have got 87 hrs on 151BJ and have never had a p roblem until today. Full fuel, =0A two 200lb guys and wow what a shake. I dropped my passenger and still had a =0A shake and then landed without one . Took off again and it was just a minute =0A shake, landed with none. Wei rd after all these take offs =0A and landings for it to start now. I am go ing to pull the fairings off and =0A check for other things, but while I a m at it I might put the stiffeners on. =0A Thanks in advance =0A =0A Do not =0A archive=0A Bruce =0A Johnson=0A=0A=0A=0A No virus found in this message. Checked =0A by AVG - www.avg.com 02/15/13 < font> =0A=0Ahref="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matr onics.com/Navigator?RV10-List=0Ahref="http://forums.matronics.com">http:/ /forums.matronics.com=0Ahref="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http ://www.matronics.com/c=0A=0A=0A=0A http://www.matronics.com/Navi="_blank" ==============0A=0A


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:24:59 AM PST US
    From: Don McDonald <building_partner@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Baggage Area Weight
    It's really a non-issue anyway.... unless you're loading steel or lead back there, you'll run out of room before you exceed either weight limit.- Th e baggage area can easily support 200+ pounds...... having spent some time back there myself...(during the build!). it's more of a weight and balance safety concern. --- On Fri, 2/15/13, Bob Turner <bobturner@alum.rpi.edu> wrote: From: Bob Turner <bobturner@alum.rpi.edu> Subject: RV10-List: Baggage Area Weight The paperwork from Vans that came with my final kit recommended a maximum o f 150 lbs in the baggage area. But I see Vans' web site now says 100 lbs maximum. Anyone know when this change happened? Or why? Bob -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394373#394373 le, List Admin.


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:26:45 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: static port
    From: "johngoodman" <johngoodman@earthlink.net>
    Don't see why it wouldn't. Looks fine to me. John -------- #40572 Phase One complete and flying. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394404#394404


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:34:26 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: The Harbor Freight 2 Ton Shop Crane
    From: "johngoodman" <johngoodman@earthlink.net>
    Two Ton Crane? I thought they were One Ton Cranes - 2000 pounds. John -------- #40572 Phase One complete and flying. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394405#394405


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:35:13 AM PST US
    From: "Pascal" <rv10flyer@live.com>
    Subject: Re: Gear leg stiffeners
    sounds like the situation I was in, hadn't flown in weeks. and it was about 15 kts when it started. I guess I need to go taxi around and get it all rounded out again! Thanks for the feedback! -----Original Message----- From: rv10flyer Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 9:57 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Gear leg stiffeners Occasionally I get a nose wheel fore-aft shimmy around 15 kts GS. If my plane sits in one place more than 10 days, Van's tires get flat spots which can induce resonance in the round gear legs. I know my tires are out of round by 1/4" and have Desser retreads in stock when I get a few more hours on these. Fly more. -------- Wayne G. SB 12/01/2009-12/01/2011 TT= 97.6 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394398#394398


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:02:07 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: static port
    From: Rob Kermanj <flysrv10@gmail.com>
    I thought that I read on this forum that some give erroneous pressures because they project too far out. Although I could not find the conversation in the archives. Do not archive. Rob Kermanj Sent from my iPad On Feb 16, 2013, at 9:25 AM, "johngoodman" <johngoodman@earthlink.net> wrote: > > Don't see why it wouldn't. Looks fine to me. > John > > -------- > #40572 Phase One complete and flying. > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394404#394404 > > > > > > > > > >


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:44:00 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: static port
    From: Bob Leffler <rv@thelefflers.com>
    I believe that Tim has a write up on his site. If I recall, too flat was the issue. I'm at the hangar with out a good Internet connection to validate my memory. Bob Sent from my iPhone On Feb 16, 2013, at 10:06 AM, Rob Kermanj <flysrv10@gmail.com> wrote: I thought that I read on this forum that some give erroneous pressures because they project too far out. Although I could not find the conversation in the archives. Do not archive. Rob Kermanj Sent from my iPad On Feb 16, 2013, at 9:25 AM, "johngoodman" <johngoodman@earthlink.net> wrote: > > Don't see why it wouldn't. Looks fine to me. > John > > -------- > #40572 Phase One complete and flying. > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394404#394404


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:24:14 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: static port
    From: Rob Kermanj <flysrv10@gmail.com>
    Thanks. I will check it out. do not archive On Feb 16, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Bob Leffler <rv@thelefflers.com> wrote: > > I believe that Tim has a write up on his site. If I recall, too flat was the issue. I'm at the hangar with out a good Internet connection to validate my memory. > > Bob > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Feb 16, 2013, at 10:06 AM, Rob Kermanj <flysrv10@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I thought that I read on this forum that some give erroneous pressures because they project too far out. Although I could not find the conversation in the archives. > > Do not archive. > > Rob Kermanj > Sent from my iPad > > On Feb 16, 2013, at 9:25 AM, "johngoodman" <johngoodman@earthlink.net> wrote: > >> >> Don't see why it wouldn't. Looks fine to me. >> John >> >> -------- >> #40572 Phase One complete and flying. >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394404#394404 > > > > > > > > > >


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:39:31 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: N880EE Exposed
    From: Rick Lark <larkrv10@gmail.com>
    Looking good Robin. Are goinf g to bring the -8 to SnF or Oshkosh? Rick On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Robin Marks <robin@painttheweb.com> wrote : > RV List**** > > I recently posted a First Flight on the Vans site and VAF. I thought I > would share it with those on this list that didn=92t already know about 8 5. > **** > > Robin**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > http://www.vansairforce.com/community/showthread.php?p=744277**** > > ** ** > > http://www.vansaircraft.com/public/first-flights.htm**** > > ** ** > > *More photos can be seen at:* > http://www.painttheweb.com/painttheweb/RV-8A/**** > > *HD Video can be seen at:* > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJ912gZyQ0U&feature=share&list=UU33R vUl-OACUdX3XIljn26w > **** > > ** ** > > * > =========== =========== =========== =========== > * > >


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:02:37 AM PST US
    From: Robin Marks <robin@PaintTheWeb.com>
    Subject: Re: N880EE Exposed
    Not SnF for sure. Schedule does not allow it this year. OSH is a possibilit y but the 10 is so much more comfortable and if I go I may bring some frien ds which again means the 10 so the answer is I don't really know just yet. The up side is if I do bring the 10 people can check out my Showplanes cowl . My 2013 calendar is loading up quickly. Hope to be at OSH 13 with 2 seats or 4, Robin Rick Lark <larkrv10@gmail.com> wrote: Looking good Robin. Are goinf g to bring the -8 to SnF or Oshkosh? Rick On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Robin Marks <robin@painttheweb.com<mailto :robin@painttheweb.com>> wrote: RV List I recently posted a First Flight on the Vans site and VAF. I thought I woul d share it with those on this list that didn=92t already know about 85. Robin http://www.vansairforce.com/community/showthread.php?p=744277 http://www.vansaircraft.com/public/first-flights.htm More photos can be seen at: http://www.painttheweb.com/painttheweb/RV-8A/ HD Video can be seen at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJ912gZyQ0U&feature=share&list=UU33RvU l-OACUdX3XIljn26w get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:13:02 AM PST US
    From: "Carlos Trigo" <trigo@mail.telepac.pt>
    Subject: Airspeed Indicator
    Guys We are going to install an Airspeed Indicator from Van's as a back-up in our instrument panel. Those of you who also have one ASI in your panel, which one did you choose, with the Knots in the inner scale or the outer scale? Carlos


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:33:36 AM PST US
    From: Robin Marks <robin@PaintTheWeb.com>
    Subject: Airspeed Indicator
    Carlos, On my 8A I installed the 3.125" Gemini EFIS with its own small backup batte ry supply (not the TT battery we used the TCW unit). Instead of just giving Airspeed you get a full 6 pack plus more in the unit. Works great and a so lution for a lot of info in a small format. No way would I use individual c omponents at this point in avionics development. Robin http://www.trutrakflightsystems.com/products/Gemini_PFD.html [Gemini ADI] From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@m atronics.com] On Behalf Of Carlos Trigo Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2013 9:13 AM Subject: RV10-List: Airspeed Indicator Guys We are going to install an Airspeed Indicator from Van's as a back-up in ou r instrument panel. Those of you who also have one ASI in your panel, which one did you choose, with the Knots in the inner scale or the outer scale? Carlos


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:10:16 PM PST US
    From: davidsoutpost@comcast.net
    Subject: Re: Airspeed Indicator


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:31:54 PM PST US
    Subject: Mounting PC680 on firewall
    From: "rvdave" <davidbf@centurytel.net>
    Looking to mount second battery on firewall with aluminum tray from Hawker. Thinking about letting bottom of tray/battery rest on engine mount with baffle material on mount. Anyone foresee a problem or better location? -------- Dave Ford RV6 flying RV10 building Cadillac, MI Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394420#394420 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/battery_b_948.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/battery_a_133.jpg


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:07:54 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Mounting PC680 on firewall
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    I'd never do it. Tim On Feb 16, 2013, at 2:27 PM, "rvdave" <davidbf@centurytel.net> wrote: > > Looking to mount second battery on firewall with aluminum tray from Hawker. Thinking about letting bottom of tray/battery rest on engine mount with baffle material on mount. Anyone foresee a problem or better location? > > -------- > Dave Ford > RV6 flying > RV10 building > Cadillac, MI > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394420#394420 > > > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/battery_b_948.jpg > http://forums.matronics.com//files/battery_a_133.jpg > > > > > >


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:26:42 PM PST US
    From: "Carl Froehlich" <carl.froehlich@verizon.net>
    Subject: Mounting PC680 on firewall
    I modified the stock battery mount to hold two PC625 batteries (batteries are mounted at 90 degrees to the axis of the plane (back to back with a 1/4" spacer), and both are held down by the one stock battery clamp). The PC625 has a little more CCA power than the PC680, a pound lighter and has a better form factor for this application. The batteries normally operate in parallel, but are split in the event of a component failure (e.g. alternator). When split half the panel runs on the one, the other half on the other, or both sides can run on one or the other battery in the event a battery (or more likely master solenoid) itself failed. Carl -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of rvdave Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2013 3:28 PM Subject: RV10-List: Mounting PC680 on firewall Looking to mount second battery on firewall with aluminum tray from Hawker. Thinking about letting bottom of tray/battery rest on engine mount with baffle material on mount. Anyone foresee a problem or better location? -------- Dave Ford RV6 flying RV10 building Cadillac, MI Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394420#394420 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/battery_b_948.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/battery_a_133.jpg


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:39:30 PM PST US
    From: "Carl Froehlich" <carl.froehlich@verizon.net>
    Subject: Re: static port
    Yep - too flat is the problem. I used a couple of 3/16 AN470 rivets with a 1/16 hole drilled through the head and the rivet shank. I made a 5/8" diameter x 1/4" thick aluminum ring (disc with a 3/16" hole drill in the center) as a backing plate to the rivet. Epoxy the rivet and backing ring to the inside skin. Once set glue on the static line over the rivet shank. No fittings required or desired. This solved the static error I had on the 8A (I was using a first generation Cleaveland port), and on the 10 works perfectly as well. Get a dozen or so of the rivets as it takes a couple of tries to get the hole drill right in the center of the shank. You want a rivet shank an inch or so long. Carl -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bob Leffler Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2013 10:29 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: static port I believe that Tim has a write up on his site. If I recall, too flat was the issue. I'm at the hangar with out a good Internet connection to validate my memory. Bob Sent from my iPhone On Feb 16, 2013, at 10:06 AM, Rob Kermanj <flysrv10@gmail.com> wrote: I thought that I read on this forum that some give erroneous pressures because they project too far out. Although I could not find the conversation in the archives. Do not archive. Rob Kermanj Sent from my iPad On Feb 16, 2013, at 9:25 AM, "johngoodman" <johngoodman@earthlink.net> wrote: > --> <johngoodman@earthlink.net> > > Don't see why it wouldn't. Looks fine to me. > John > > -------- > #40572 Phase One complete and flying. > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394404#394404


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:46:55 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: N880EE Exposed
    From: Rick Lark <larkrv10@gmail.com>
    Let me try that again, Robin are you going to attend either SnF or Airventure?? I'd sure like to see the RV8 Rick On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Rick Lark <larkrv10@gmail.com> wrote: > Looking good Robin. Are goinf g to bring the -8 to SnF or Oshkosh? > > Rick > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Robin Marks <robin@painttheweb.com>wrot e: > >> RV List**** >> >> I recently posted a First Flight on the Vans site and VAF. I thought I >> would share it with those on this list that didn=92t already know about 85. >> **** >> >> Robin**** >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> >> http://www.vansairforce.com/community/showthread.php?p=744277**** >> >> ** ** >> >> http://www.vansaircraft.com/public/first-flights.htm**** >> >> ** ** >> >> *More photos can be seen at:* >> http://www.painttheweb.com/painttheweb/RV-8A/**** >> >> *HD Video can be seen at:* >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJ912gZyQ0U&feature=share&list=UU33 RvUl-OACUdX3XIljn26w >> **** >> >> ** ** >> >> * >> =========== =========== =========== =========== >> * >> >> >


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:52:32 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: static port
    From: Rick Lark <larkrv10@gmail.com>
    Rob or anyone else. I have a pair of the Cleveland ports I bought but ended up using Safe Air instead. If anyone wants them for the cost of the postage, they're yours... Rick #40956 Southampton, Ont On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 5:57 AM, Rob Kermanj <flysrv10@gmail.com> wrote: > > anyone has used the static port fitting from Cleveland Tools > http://www.cleavelandtool.com/prodinfo.asp?number=SPF140#.UR9keKUhdic? > > if so, any idea if they are accurate? > > Thanks > Rob. > >


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:30:58 PM PST US
    From: Robin Marks <robin@PaintTheWeb.com>
    Subject: N880EE Exposed
    Ill respond again... Not SnF for sure. Schedule does not allow it this year. OSH is a possibilit y but the 10 is so much more comfortable and if I go I may bring some frien ds which again means the 10 so the answer is I don't really know just yet. The up side is if I do bring the 10 people can check out my Showplanes cowl . My 2013 calendar is loading up quickly. Hope to be at OSH 13 with 2 seats or 4, Robin ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [owner-rv10-list-server@matronic s.com] on behalf of Rick Lark [larkrv10@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2013 1:46 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: N880EE Exposed Let me try that again, Robin are you going to attend either SnF or Airvent ure?? I'd sure like to see the RV8 Rick On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Rick Lark <larkrv10@gmail.com<mailto:lark rv10@gmail.com>> wrote: Looking good Robin. Are goinf g to bring the -8 to SnF or Oshkosh? Rick On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Robin Marks <robin@painttheweb.com<mailto :robin@painttheweb.com>> wrote: RV List I recently posted a First Flight on the Vans site and VAF. I thought I woul d share it with those on this list that didn=92t already know about 85. Robin http://www.vansairforce.com/community/showthread.php?p=744277 http://www.vansaircraft.com/public/first-flights.htm More photos can be seen at: http://www.painttheweb.com/painttheweb/RV-8A/ HD Video can be seen at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJ912gZyQ0U&feature=share&list=UU33RvU l-OACUdX3XIljn26w get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:39:38 PM PST US
    From: Robin Marks <robin@PaintTheWeb.com>
    Subject: Mounting PC680 on firewall
    I'm with Tim. Keep it of the engine mount at a minimum. Here is my dual battery set up. I have a 3rd (smaller) battery that exclusi vely supports my D100 in case of a total electrical failure. Robin [cid:image003.jpg@01CE0C53.40C38F60] -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@m atronics.com] On Behalf Of Carl Froehlich Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2013 1:25 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Mounting PC680 on firewall --> <carl.froehlich@verizon.net<mailto:carl.froehlich@verizon.net>> I modified the stock battery mount to hold two PC625 batteries (batteries a re mounted at 90 degrees to the axis of the plane (back to back with a 1/4" spacer), and both are held down by the one stock battery clamp). The PC625 has a little more CCA power than the PC680, a pound lighter and has a bett er form factor for this application. The batteries normally operate in parallel, but are split in the event of a component failure (e.g. alternator). When split half the panel runs on th e one, the other half on the other, or both sides can run on one or the oth er battery in the event a battery (or more likely master solenoid) itself f ailed. Carl -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com<mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@ma tronics.com> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of rvdave Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2013 3:28 PM Subject: RV10-List: Mounting PC680 on firewall vidbf@centurytel.net>> Looking to mount second battery on firewall with aluminum tray from Hawker. Thinking about letting bottom of tray/battery rest on engine mount with baffle material on mount. Anyone foresee a problem or better location? -------- Dave Ford RV6 flying RV10 building Cadillac, MI Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394420#394420 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/battery_b_948.jpg<http://forums.matronic s.com/files/battery_b_948.jpg> http://forums.matronics.com//files/battery_a_133.jpg<http://forums.matronic s.com/files/battery_a_133.jpg>




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv10-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV10-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv10-list
  • Browse RV10-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --