RV10-List Digest Archive

Mon 03/11/13


Total Messages Posted: 7



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 11:08 AM - Finishing Kit Substitution Costs (Dave Fritzsche (Building))
     2. 11:30 AM - Re: Finishing Kit Substitution Costs (Pascal)
     3. 02:19 PM - Step intallation (Carlos Trigo)
     4. 03:11 PM - Re: Step intallation (Rick Lark)
     5. 03:35 PM - Re: Step intallation (bill.peyton)
     6. 06:49 PM - Firewall insulation (Ed Godfrey)
     7. 07:04 PM - cabin top trimming data point (Rick Lark)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:08:35 AM PST US
    From: "Dave Fritzsche (Building)" <dfritz@bpgsim.com>
    Subject: Finishing Kit Substitution Costs
    I pretty much went with the list of substitutions suggested on Tim's site and this list. My windshield and back side windows came with the fuselage kit I already had. I chose to delete the two door windows for which Van's credited me $110 each. The door windows from Dresser cost $150 each. Van's credited me $100.38 for the nose wheel. MATCO charged 130.49 for the nose wheel. Van's credited me $68 each for the main gear tires and $52.40 for the nose wheel tire. Dresser charge $69 each for the main gear retreads and $69.95 for the nose wheel retread. Thus these were not direct cost substitutes, but the nose wheel is a must and I hope the windows are worth the difference and I understand the tires wear longer. I thought this might be of interest to those at this stage of the build. Dave -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Fritzsche 40813 Puyallup, WA Fuselage


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:30:00 AM PST US
    From: "Pascal" <rv10flyer@live.com>
    Subject: Re: Finishing Kit Substitution Costs
    Dave; I helped Desser with the front window/windscreen another builder with the sides- they fit perfectly versus having to do all the trimming to make it fit. The quality of Cee baileys is also better than that sent from Vans. Keep in mind that you may pay more for the windows, Matco and tires but you are far better off for it. In the end you really saved a whole lot of time and eventually money as the parts you replaced from the Vans parts will last far longer. I make nothing on this, but believe me I worked with Desser/Cee Baileys because the windows are lacking from Vans and the product Desser came up with was based on thriving for perfection and a perfect fit "as is". Until you have put the windows on and off 20 times to get the gap right one would not understand the advantage of having a nearly perfect fitting piece on arrival. I tossed my windscreen as I had a "bulge" on the co-pilot side and used the Desser version that was rounded and tight fitting throughout. Thanks for the feedback! Pascal -----Original Message----- From: Dave Fritzsche (Building) Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 11:07 AM Subject: RV10-List: Finishing Kit Substitution Costs <dfritz@bpgsim.com> I pretty much went with the list of substitutions suggested on Tim's site and this list. My windshield and back side windows came with the fuselage kit I already had. I chose to delete the two door windows for which Van's credited me $110 each. The door windows from Dresser cost $150 each. Van's credited me $100.38 for the nose wheel. MATCO charged 130.49 for the nose wheel. Van's credited me $68 each for the main gear tires and $52.40 for the nose wheel tire. Dresser charge $69 each for the main gear retreads and $69.95 for the nose wheel retread. Thus these were not direct cost substitutes, but the nose wheel is a must and I hope the windows are worth the difference and I understand the tires wear longer. I thought this might be of interest to those at this stage of the build. Dave -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Fritzsche 40813 Puyallup, WA Fuselage


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:19:27 PM PST US
    From: "Carlos Trigo" <trigo@mail.telepac.pt>
    Subject: Step intallation
    Hi there On the QB fuselage, I came to the conclusion that most of the step installation work is already done, you only have to insert the step and final-drill the vertical hole for the AN3-20A bolt. My problem is that, with the existing pilot holes aligned, neither the 45 =BC=94 distance (between the aft edge of the wing attachment bulkhead and the leading edge of the step) indicated in fig. 2 of page 30-3 is good (I have around 1=94 more), nor the weld at the top of the step sits flush with the skin=85 Should I change anything to mate those 2 conditions, or can I just final-drill the hole like it is? Thanks Carlos


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:11:39 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Step intallation
    From: Rick Lark <larkrv10@gmail.com>
    Carlos, I only had pilot holes in the powder coated support, not the step tube, so I slid the steps in as far as required to get the right dimension. Also search the archives as lots of later builders are putting in a solid plug in the step tube, and then drilling through the whole assembly to help keep the bolt from lossening up over time. See Bob Newmans web site for details. Rick #40956 Southampton, Ont On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Carlos Trigo <trigo@mail.telepac.pt> wrote : > Hi there**** > > ** ** > > On the QB fuselage, I came to the conclusion that most of the step > installation work is already done, you only have to insert the step and > final-drill the vertical hole for the AN3-20A bolt.**** > > ** ** > > My problem is that, with the existing pilot holes aligned, neither the 45 > =BC=94 distance (between the aft edge of the wing attachment bulkhead and the > leading edge of the step) indicated in fig. 2 of page 30-3 is good (I hav e > around 1=94 more), nor the weld at the top of the step sits flush with th e > skin=85**** > > ** ** > > Should I change anything to mate those 2 conditions, or can I just > final-drill the hole like it is?**** > > ** ** > > Thanks**** > > Carlos **** > > * > =========== =========== =========== =========== > * > >


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:35:54 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Step intallation
    From: "bill.peyton" <peyton.b@sbcglobal.net>
    Are you sure you have the correct step on the correct side ? Also, you may want to create an access plate for the bolt in case it loosens up or the weld cracks. I believe bob Newman sells an insert for the step as Rick has posted above -------- Bill WA0SYV Aviation Partners, LLC Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=396048#396048


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:49:49 PM PST US
    From: Ed Godfrey <egodfrey@ameritech.net>
    Subject: Firewall insulation
    All, I am trying to make a decision as to a decent method of firewall insulation. I have looked through the arhives and have seen where some have used a Fiberfrax type of material and some have used a foam material. Is there anything that might not be a good idea to use bot the Fiberfrax as a thermal insulation and a foam insulation for acoustic?Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Ed Godfrey 40717


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:04:20 PM PST US
    Subject: cabin top trimming data point
    From: Rick Lark <larkrv10@gmail.com>
    Guys, I started trimming the cabin top today and made 2 discoveries. 1) as others have found normal jig saw blades dull incredibly quickly. 2) I also tried a carbide jig saw blade I purchased years ago to cut ceramic tile. This blade was mounted in my Makita jig saw and worked great. I completed all the rough trimming in probably a 1/2 hour, and with little dust compared to a rotary tool. Unfortunately I have no idea where I purchased this blade now but if you can find one, give it a try. Rick #40956 Southampton, Ont




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv10-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV10-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv10-list
  • Browse RV10-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --