RV10-List Digest Archive

Fri 08/30/13


Total Messages Posted: 3



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 10:52 AM - Oil choice (Dan Masys)
     2. 11:05 AM - Re: Oil choice (Pascal)
     3. 01:52 PM - Re: Oil choice (Kelly McMullen)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:52:14 AM PST US
    From: "Dan Masys" <dmasys@u.washington.edu>
    Subject: Oil choice
    So after decades of blissfully thinking I was doing the right thing for my aircraft engines by feeding them Aeroshell 15W50, it now is being called evil stuff by knowledgeable folks like Mike Busch. Is there general consensus that Phillips 15W50 is better as a multiviscosity oil for our IO-540's? And if using that does it have to be supplemented by Camguard to add back the Lycoming 'snake oil' additive to protect the parts that are only splash lubricated? Not trying to set off oilfield flame wars but have the feeling that somehow I missed something... -Dan Masys N104LD 620 hrs TTSN


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:05:46 AM PST US
    From: "Pascal" <rv10flyer@live.com>
    Subject: Re: Oil choice
    15w-50 is for radial, get the XC 20w-50. I used it for well over 100 hours- straight, than I used it adding camguard, now I use Aeroshell with camguard. Ask yourself, where are you located (if 100 miles from ocean and in warmer climates, like myself in So California, I could use the Aerosheel w100 year round, I'll switch to phillips for the winter anyway, in case I go up to the mountains 20 minutes away. If you fly often, and/or not near ocean or corrosion prone areas, skip the camguard. basically everything Mike comments on on his webinar. Pascal -----Original Message----- From: Dan Masys Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 10:51 AM Subject: RV10-List: Oil choice So after decades of blissfully thinking I was doing the right thing for my aircraft engines by feeding them Aeroshell 15W50, it now is being called evil stuff by knowledgeable folks like Mike Busch. Is there general consensus that Phillips 15W50 is better as a multiviscosity oil for our IO-540's? And if using that does it have to be supplemented by Camguard to add back the Lycoming 'snake oil' additive to protect the parts that are only splash lubricated? Not trying to set off oilfield flame wars but have the feeling that somehow I missed something... -Dan Masys N104LD 620 hrs TTSN


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:52:52 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Oil choice
    From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2@gmail.com>
    The problem with AS 15-50 is that it is 50% synthetic oil which does not keep solids suspended. It does contain the Lycoming addidtive. You do NOT need the Lycoming additive. It is for the "76" series engines like the O-320-H2AD that had very different cam and lifters than what your IO-540 has. The Lycoming additive is a version of tricresyl Phospate, or TCP, and is an extreme pressure lubricant. Later replaced by close cousin TPP. Phillips does not have that additive, and I don't think Camguard does either. Camguard is primarily an anti-corrosive, which is helpful in preventing pitting on the cam. The Phillips/Camguard combo gives best anti-corrosion protection. The Phillips is all mineral based, no synthetics. On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Dan Masys <dmasys@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > So after decades of blissfully thinking I was doing the right thing for my > aircraft engines by feeding them Aeroshell 15W50, it now is being called > evil stuff by knowledgeable folks like Mike Busch. Is there general > consensus that Phillips 15W50 is better as a multiviscosity oil for our > IO-540's? > > And if using that does it have to be supplemented by Camguard to add back > the Lycoming 'snake oil' additive to protect the parts that are only splash > lubricated? > > Not trying to set off oilfield flame wars but have the feeling that somehow > I missed something... > > -Dan Masys > N104LD 620 hrs TTSN > > -- - sent from the microchip implanted in my forearm




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv10-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV10-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv10-list
  • Browse RV10-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --