Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 11:56 AM - Re: Oil choice (Jesse Saint)
2. 01:49 PM - Re: Re: Nose gear leg fairing (Chris)
3. 05:02 PM - Re: Flying the Hudson through NY and to Washington DC. (ivankris)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Ditto on this. I use Phillips with Camguard except during the first
50-100 hours on a new engine, where I leave out the Camguard.
Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation, Inc.
jesse@saintaviation.com
C: 352-427-0285
F: 815-377-3694
On Aug 30, 2013, at 4:52 PM, Kelly McMullen <apilot2@gmail.com> wrote:
> The problem with AS 15-50 is that it is 50% synthetic oil which does
not keep solids suspended.
> It does contain the Lycoming addidtive.
> You do NOT need the Lycoming additive. It is for the "76" series
engines like the O-320-H2AD that had very different cam and lifters than
what your IO-540 has. The Lycoming additive is a version of tricresyl
Phospate, or TCP, and is an extreme pressure lubricant. Later replaced
by close cousin TPP.
> Phillips does not have that additive, and I don't think Camguard does
either. Camguard is primarily an anti-corrosive, which is helpful in
preventing pitting on the cam.
> The Phillips/Camguard combo gives best anti-corrosion protection. The
Phillips is all mineral based, no synthetics.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Dan Masys <dmasys@u.washington.edu>
wrote:
>
> So after decades of blissfully thinking I was doing the right thing
for my
> aircraft engines by feeding them Aeroshell 15W50, it now is being
called
> evil stuff by knowledgeable folks like Mike Busch. Is there general
> consensus that Phillips 15W50 is better as a multiviscosity oil for
our
> IO-540's?
>
> And if using that does it have to be supplemented by Camguard to add
back
> the Lycoming 'snake oil' additive to protect the parts that are only
splash
> lubricated?
>
> Not trying to set off oilfield flame wars but have the feeling that
somehow
> I missed something...
>
> -Dan Masys
> N104LD 620 hrs TTSN
>
>
>
> ==========
> arget="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
> ==========
> http://forums.matronics.com
> ==========
> le, List Admin.
> ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
> ==========
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> - sent from the microchip implanted in my forearm
>
>
>
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Nose gear leg fairing |
Thanks to all on the replies. I guess my case is a bit isolated. I do
remember adding glass to the lower attach points but I don't remember if I
did to the uppers - it is drawn in a bit by the screw but the gopro camera
lens might exaggerate it a little. Easy enough to go ahead and pull it off
and add some glass as you say below, and check for any exhaust leaks. I did
not see any fuel residue around it.
Thanks
Chris
N919AR
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of rv10flyer
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 12:54 AM
Subject: RV10-List: Re: Nose gear leg fairing
I had to build up on the inside of mine 1/8" at all four locations. Weekend
job for you coming up.
--------
Wayne G.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=407964#407964
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Flying the Hudson through NY and to Washington DC. |
Thanks to all for the help, ideas and suggestions you have given me here. I have
done the on-line courses for both the Washington Special Flight Rules Area (SFRA)
and the NY City SFRA. Now armed with a good knowledge of the rules and the
correct charts combined with the experience of having done it once before (15+
years ago) I feel quite confident that we can pull this off without any trouble.
The plan is to fly directly to Westchester County (KHPN) for customs and then launch
from there to do the Hudson River sight seeing tour. After the tour we will
stop in Monmouth Executive (KBLM) for lunch and file an IFR flight plan to
go into Gaithersburg (KGAI) where we will stay for a couple of nights and do
the Washington tourist thing.
Here is a link to SkyVectors.com showing my routing.
http://skyvector.com/?ll=40.921260992712455,-78.63061523802082&chart=301&zoom=7&plan=A.CY.CYKF:V.K6.BUF:V.K6.CFB:F.K6.GAYEL:F.K6.VALRE:A.K6.KHPN:V.K6.COL:A.K6.KBLM:A.K6.KGAI:V.K6.HGR:V.K6.TON:V.K6.JHW:A.CY.CYKF
--------
Ivan Kristensen.
www.ivankristensen.com
Builder # 40838
Flying (430hrs.)
C-GMDV
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=407994#407994
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|