Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 05:37 AM - Re: Fuel Pump Issue (BPA)
2. 07:13 AM - Re: Fuel Pump Issue (Kelly McMullen)
3. 07:27 AM - Re: Fuel Pump Issue (Bob Leffler)
4. 07:32 AM - Re: Fuel Pump Issue (BPA)
5. 07:35 AM - Re: Fuel Pump Issue (Kelly McMullen)
6. 09:57 AM - Re: Fuel Pump Issue (Ben Westfall)
7. 09:14 PM - Re: Fuel Pump Issue (Kelly McMullen)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Lycoming is notorious for part number changes. Any time they change a
vendor they change a P/N. Tempest makes the pump also. Call Justin at
Quality Aircraft Acc.
Allen Barrett
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bob Leffler
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: RV10-List: Fuel Pump Issue
After shipping the data logs from my two flights and ground testing to
Lycoming, they are recommending replacing my fuel pump. Naturally, I
am just outside the warranty period.
They recommended a part #62B26931, which I can find that it is an
approved substitute for the installed part, which is a LW15473. Anyone
know what the difference may be?
Bob
Sent from my iPad
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Fuel Pump Issue |
Seems rather poor customer service to sell an experimental engine, that
they know won't be put into service for many months after the sale, if
not a year or so, to not cover a fuel pump that only has an hour or two
of actual operation.
On 10/22/2013 5:39 AM, BPA wrote:
>
> Lycoming is notorious for part number changes. Any time they change a
> vendor they change a P/N. Tempest makes the pump also. Call Justin at
> Quality Aircraft Acc.
>
> Allen Barrett
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bob Leffler
> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 5:55 PM
> To: rv10-list@matronics.com
> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Fuel Pump Issue
>
>
> After shipping the data logs from my two flights and ground testing to
> Lycoming, they are recommending replacing my fuel pump. Naturally, I
> am just outside the warranty period.
>
> They recommended a part #62B26931, which I can find that it is an
> approved substitute for the installed part, which is a LW15473. Anyone
> know what the difference may be?
>
> Bob
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Fuel Pump Issue |
Allen,
Any opinion on the differences between the Lycoming part and the Tempest? The
Tempest is $100 less expensive.
Thanks,
Bob
Sent from my iPad
> On Oct 22, 2013, at 8:39 AM, "BPA" <BPA@bpaengines.com> wrote:
>
>
> Lycoming is notorious for part number changes. Any time they change a
> vendor they change a P/N. Tempest makes the pump also. Call Justin at
> Quality Aircraft Acc.
>
> Allen Barrett
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bob Leffler
> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 5:55 PM
> To: rv10-list@matronics.com
> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Fuel Pump Issue
>
>
> After shipping the data logs from my two flights and ground testing to
> Lycoming, they are recommending replacing my fuel pump. Naturally, I
> am just outside the warranty period.
>
> They recommended a part #62B26931, which I can find that it is an
> approved substitute for the installed part, which is a LW15473. Anyone
> know what the difference may be?
>
> Bob
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
They seem to work just fine in the test cell and I haven't heard of any
field issues.
Allen
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bob Leffler
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 8:27 AM
Subject: Re: RV10-List: Fuel Pump Issue
Allen,
Any opinion on the differences between the Lycoming part and the
Tempest? The Tempest is $100 less expensive.
Thanks,
Bob
Sent from my iPad
> On Oct 22, 2013, at 8:39 AM, "BPA" <BPA@bpaengines.com> wrote:
>
>
> Lycoming is notorious for part number changes. Any time they change a
> vendor they change a P/N. Tempest makes the pump also. Call Justin at
> Quality Aircraft Acc.
>
> Allen Barrett
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bob Leffler
> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 5:55 PM
> To: rv10-list@matronics.com
> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Fuel Pump Issue
>
>
> After shipping the data logs from my two flights and ground testing to
> Lycoming, they are recommending replacing my fuel pump. Naturally, I
> am just outside the warranty period.
>
> They recommended a part #62B26931, which I can find that it is an
> approved substitute for the installed part, which is a LW15473.
Anyone
> know what the difference may be?
>
> Bob
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Fuel Pump Issue |
Your guess is as good as any. Lycomng platinum gold dust sprinkled on the
paperwork?
Go with the Tempest and spend the difference on 100LL/
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Bob Leffler <rv@thelefflers.com> wrote:
>
> Allen,
>
> Any opinion on the differences between the Lycoming part and the Tempest?
> The Tempest is $100 less expensive.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bob
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On Oct 22, 2013, at 8:39 AM, "BPA" <BPA@bpaengines.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Lycoming is notorious for part number changes. Any time they change a
> > vendor they change a P/N. Tempest makes the pump also. Call Justin at
> > Quality Aircraft Acc.
> >
> > Allen Barrett
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
> > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bob Leffler
> > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 5:55 PM
> > To: rv10-list@matronics.com
> > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Fuel Pump Issue
> >
> >
> > After shipping the data logs from my two flights and ground testing to
> > Lycoming, they are recommending replacing my fuel pump. Naturally, I
> > am just outside the warranty period.
> >
> > They recommended a part #62B26931, which I can find that it is an
> > approved substitute for the installed part, which is a LW15473. Anyone
> > know what the difference may be?
> >
> > Bob
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
--
- sent from the microchip implanted in my forearm
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Geez Kelly what do you expect for $45,800... decent customer service? :-).
-Ben
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Kelly McMullen
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 7:13 AM
Subject: Re: RV10-List: Fuel Pump Issue
Seems rather poor customer service to sell an experimental engine, that they
know won't be put into service for many months after the sale, if not a year
or so, to not cover a fuel pump that only has an hour or two of actual
operation.
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Fuel Pump Issue |
Well, I'm sure it would drive Lyc into bankruptcy to warrant that $200 pump.
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Ben Westfall <rv10@sinkrate.com> wrote:
>
> Geez Kelly what do you expect for $45,800... decent customer service? :-).
>
> -Ben
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Kelly McMullen
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 7:13 AM
> To: rv10-list@matronics.com
> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Fuel Pump Issue
>
>
> Seems rather poor customer service to sell an experimental engine, that
> they
> know won't be put into service for many months after the sale, if not a
> year
> or so, to not cover a fuel pump that only has an hour or two of actual
> operation.
>
>
--
- sent from the microchip implanted in my forearm
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|