RV10-List Digest Archive

Mon 09/08/14


Total Messages Posted: 7



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:44 AM - SB Nose Wheel Report (Jim Combs)
     2. 09:25 AM - Re: Re: SB 2014-08-29 (Tim Olson)
     3. 01:24 PM - Re: Re: SB 2014-08-29 (Kelly McMullen)
     4. 01:44 PM - Re: SB 2014-08-29 (johngoodman)
     5. 01:58 PM - Re: Re: SB 2014-08-29 (Linn Walters)
     6. 02:11 PM - Re: Re: SB 2014-08-29 (Kelly McMullen)
     7. 07:38 PM - Re: Conduit in the wing (jeffwhip)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:44:44 AM PST US
    Subject: SB Nose Wheel Report
    From: Jim Combs <jiminlexky@gmail.com>
    I did the SB nose wheel inspection this weekend. Serial: 40192 Total Hours: 687 Weight: 1542 lbs Empty CG: 108.10 Nose Wheel Mount Status: No Cracks Misc: I just installed my third set of main tires / inner tubes and second nose wheel tire / tube. Jim Combs Do Not Archive


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:25:41 AM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: SB 2014-08-29
    Go Back VAF Forums > Model Specific > RV-10 Reload this Page SERVICE BULLETIN 14-08-29 User Name Remember Me? Password Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Search Reply Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3 View First Unread View First Unread Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes #21 Unread Yesterday, 08:27 AM Bill.Peyton's Avatar Bill.Peyton Bill.Peyton is offline Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: St. Louis, MO Posts: 1,110 Default Scott, I agree with Vic. My concern is as the elastomer donuts contract, space develops between the donuts and the weldment when it is unloaded in flight. I have had this happen twice in 300 hours, and had to insert shims to remedy. You can here it rattle during taxi. When this occurs, my concern is that the edges of the new plate insert will rub on the 4 tubes going into the current bracket. We can see this as currently evidenced by the elastomer metal washer today. I do agree that adhesive in between the new plate and the old one may not be the right answer, but using a thin enough layer might prevent this situation from occurring I don't have the answer other than to weld the new reinforcement plate even on the non-cracking mounts. Did engineering look at this situation Scott? __________________ Bill Peyton RV-10 - 290hrs First Flight Oct 2012 WA0SYV Aviation Partners, LLC Reply With Quote #22 Unread Yesterday, 05:25 PM rdoerr01 rdoerr01 is offline Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 79 Default I completed the no-crack SB on my RV-10 this morning. I painted the plate yesterday and let it dry over night. This morning I put a small ring of red RTV on the plate half way between the inner circle and the outer edge. I stuck this into position to ensure the plate doesn't come close to any of the engine mount tubes at the corners. Then I lowered the airplane and a little of the pro seal squeeze out the side. Cleaned that up and then install the top cap with a single washer spacer. I like Vic told Van's that it needs some way to stop the plate from vibrating around and destroying the engine mount tube and they agreed, but didn't really suggest anything. Thanks Ray Doerr N519RV (1140 hours) 40250 Reply With Quote #23 Unread Yesterday, 05:36 PM rvbuilder2002 rvbuilder2002 is offline Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Oregon Posts: 3,511 Default Quote: Originally Posted by Bill.Peyton View Post Did engineering look at this situation Scott? Yes, it was looked at. That is why my previous post mentioned Quote: Originally Posted by rvbuilder2002 View Post If the doubler is installed without welding (as done in the case of no cracks found) and is installed as prescribed, with some compression pre-load on the elastomers even when the nose gear leg is hanging free, and it is maintained in this state; Yes, it will take some effort on owners part to occasionally check for loss of preload in the nose gear elastomers. It has always been a design intent that there not be play in this location. It is in fact possible that some level of play can have contributed to damage in some cases. N410RV went almost 2000 hrs using the originally installed elastomers, but it did require some periodic adjustment by adding an additional spacer washer. The need for that periodic check should probably have been better conveyed to those with flying RV-10's. As a result of the continued airworthiness program for the RV-12, I think we are beginning to do a better job with that type of thing. __________________ Any opinions expressed in this message are my own and not those of my employer. Reply With Quote #24 Unread Yesterday, 07:44 PM RV10inOz's Avatar RV10inOz RV10inOz is offline Join Date: May 2008 Location: Brisbane Qld. Aust. Posts: 1,786 Default Ours is welded in about now.new bits going in this afternoon Hopefully flying tomorrow! I will post pictures later. __________________ ______________________________ David Brown Advanced Pilot Seminars-Australia The two best investments you can make, by any financial test, an EMS and APS! Reply With Quote #25 Unread Yesterday, 08:53 PM rvbuilder2002 rvbuilder2002 is offline Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Oregon Posts: 3,511 Default Quote: Originally Posted by rdoerr01 View Post I like Vic told Van's that it needs some way to stop the plate from vibrating around and destroying the engine mount tube and they agreed, but didn't really suggest anything. Actually Van's didn't agree, which is why the NOTIFICATION was issued without that recommendation. Since you used some RTV (or proseal? you mention both...), report back at your next inspection and let me know if it is still holding the plate in place or not. __________________ Any opinions expressed in this message are my own and not those of my employer. Reply With Quote #26 Unread Today, 03:59 AM RV10inOz's Avatar RV10inOz RV10inOz is offline Join Date: May 2008 Location: Brisbane Qld. Aust. Posts: 1,786 Default All went together really well. The aviation welder did a beautiful job. Fixed a cracked step too! I forgot pics today but I will be zip tie crazy in the morning tethering all the wires, and I will take some then. Only problem has been the extra nose height gained from new rubbers, new nose wheel tyre (higher quality one is bigger in diameter) and the extra thickness has dropped outr tail down. The Comanche now will not pass its stabilator under our tail. Ohh welltime to fix that problem. But it is a good problem to have. Total man hours to date; Strip down and have ready for welding 10 hrs. Welding repairs 4-5 hrs approx. Reassemble 9 hrs. Tidy up and re cowl and paper work estimate 3-4 hrs. All up about 27-28 hours I guess. The fix with the spacer ring looks really solid. I assume that the doubler insertion actually achieves the same result. __________________ ______________________________ David Brown Advanced Pilot Seminars-Australia The two best investments you can make, by any financial test, an EMS and APS! Reply With Quote #27 Unread Today, 08:09 AM vic syracuse vic syracuse is online now Super Moderator Join Date: May 2005 Location: Locust Grove, GA Posts: 1,014 Default Nose sits higher Yes, I noticed that the nose sits a little more proud now. I measured it at about a 1" gain. Mine has both the new plate and the doubler. I noticed it as well when I was cleaning the vertical fin, as I could reach up quite a bit higher. And it sounds much more solid when taxiing now, too. Scott, I did religiously make certain the elastomers were tight. I had 4 of the washers in mine. I see now that the service bulletin recommends replacement when 3 are needed. Vic __________________ Vic Syracuse Built RV-4, RV-6, 2-RV-10's, RV-7A, RV-8, Prescott Pusher, Kitfox Model II, Kitfox Speedster, Kitfox 7 Super Sport, DAR, A&P, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor, CFII-ASMEL/ASES Base Leg Aviation Mallards Landing, GA (GA04) Reply With Quote #28 Unread Today, 09:13 AM rvbuilder2002 rvbuilder2002 is offline Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Oregon Posts: 3,511 Default Quote: Originally Posted by vic syracuse View Post Yes, I noticed that the nose sits a little more proud now. I measured it at about a 1" gain. Mine has both the new plate and the doubler. I noticed it as well when I was cleaning the vertical fin, as I could reach up quite a bit higher. And it sounds much more solid when taxiing now, too. Scott, I did religiously make certain the elastomers were tight. I had 4 of the washers in mine. I see now that the service bulletin recommends replacement when 3 are needed. Vic I think the recommendation is to replace if you need MORE than 3. __________________ Any opinions expressed in this message are my own and not those of my employer. Reply With Quote #29 Unread Today, 09:54 AM vic syracuse vic syracuse is online now Super Moderator Join Date: May 2005 Location: Locust Grove, GA Posts: 1,014 Default Yep. Yep, more than 3. Vic __________________ Vic Syracuse Built RV-4, RV-6, 2-RV-10's, RV-7A, RV-8, Prescott Pusher, Kitfox Model II, Kitfox Speedster, Kitfox 7 Super Sport, DAR, A&P, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor, CFII-ASMEL/ASES Base Leg Aviation Mallards Landing, GA (GA04) Reply With Quote #30 I did my SB work this weekend. I ended up using a thin layer of RTV but did it over the entire surface, and then jacked the back end up so squeeze everything out that I could. In the end, there is really almost zero gap between the 2 plates, and there shouldn't easily be any moisture that gets in there. I believe the SB should prevent much worry about that particular part breaking, but I do have one area of concern that will linger. The shaft that the elastomers ride on, directly contacts the hole in the engine mount. The doubler is slightly larger, so there won't be an issue with that. But, when you look at the shaft, right at the top of the topmost elastomer, one side of my shaft was chafing on the hole of the engine mount. This led to a slight thinning of the shaft in one area. One other thing I noticed is that the shaft had a bit of rust inside. I believe that: 1) people should prime (NOT liquid plumber, but liquid PRIMER) the inside of that shaft before initial assembly. 2) That shaft won't last forever. At 1070 hours, it's showing wear. I'm sure it'll go 2000 hours. But, since this thing was designed with no replaceable wear surfaces, it won't last forever. I would love to see a sleeve over that part of the shaft, that can be replaced, but doing so would require that the elastomers were made with a larger hole, and the tophat shaped retainer would have to be wider too. So this isn't likely to be an easy thing to fix. So, I think people are going to have to pull that shaft and inspect it (I'd recommend maybe a 500hour inspection at least) and replace as necessary. On Van's end, I'd hope that they keep a dozen of these in stock, because it's going to be considered a wear part on higher time RV-10's. I don't know what that part costs, but it would be nice if there was some sort of bushing there to protect it...either on the hole side, or the shaft side, that could be replaced. Maybe Planearound should re-engineer for a bushing. :) Tim On 8/31/2014 9:07 AM, Barry wrote: > > Two thoughts > > 1. With the WD-1001K-MOD doubler installed it looks like there will be more clearence so the metal plates of the elastomers may clear the support tubes > > 2. With the added thickness of the doubler, you may need fewer U-1002 washers to take up the slack. I wonder if three washers will still be the max allowed > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=429679#429679 > >


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:24:33 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: SB 2014-08-29
    From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2@gmail.com>
    Having owned a Mooney for 16 yrs with the exact same shock disks as those on the nose of the RV-10, I am a bit surprised that they would lose that much height. They are installed with more compression on the Mooney, requiring sizable tools to compress, they only lose height on the newer, heavier models. My E model is about 1645 lbs empty with 2575 gross. It uses 4 disks on the mains and 3 on the nose. After 14 yrs they still meet spec for tension, with no added spacers. Perhaps the RV could use more compression........... On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Tim Olson <Tim@myrv10.com> wrote: > > > Scott, > I agree with Vic. > My concern is as the elastomer donuts contract, space develops between the > donuts and the weldment when it is unloaded in flight. I have had this > happen twice in 300 hours, and had to insert shims to remedy. You can here > it rattle during taxi. When this occurs, my concern is that the edges of > the new plate insert will rub on the 4 tubes going into the current > bracket. We can see this as currently evidenced by the elastomer metal > washer today. I do agree that adhesive in between the new plate and the old > one may not be the right answer, but using a thin enough layer might > prevent this situation from occurring I don't have the answer other than to > weld the new reinforcement plate even on the non-cracking mounts. > Did engineering look at this situation Scott? >


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:44:48 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: SB 2014-08-29
    From: "johngoodman" <johngoodman@earthlink.net>
    I found no cracks, and ordered the WD-1001K-MOD today from Van. They told me that it was backordered, so it will be a few weeks. I don't plan on installing it until my next Condition. John -------- #40572 Phase One complete in 2011 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430197#430197


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:58:41 PM PST US
    From: Linn Walters <flying-nut@cfl.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: SB 2014-08-29
    I didn't find any cracks .... and no grass field ops ....... ;-) I'm not flying yet so if someone needs one (and I'm not on the backorder list too :-P ) let me know. All I got was an email saying they'd send it out. Linn On 9/8/2014 4:44 PM, johngoodman wrote: > > I found no cracks, and ordered the WD-1001K-MOD today from Van. They told me that it was backordered, so it will be a few weeks. I don't plan on installing it until my next Condition. > John > > -------- > #40572 Phase One complete in 2011 > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430197#430197 > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > >


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:11:42 PM PST US
    From: Kelly McMullen <kellym@aviating.com>
    Subject: Re: SB 2014-08-29
    I requested mine last week, got it today. If someone is AOG and really needs it, could forward. Planning on painting this pm and mount in the next day or two. On 9/8/2014 1:57 PM, Linn Walters wrote: > > I didn't find any cracks .... and no grass field ops ....... ;-) > > I'm not flying yet so if someone needs one (and I'm not on the > backorder list too :-P ) let me know. All I got was an email saying > they'd send it out. > Linn > > On 9/8/2014 4:44 PM, johngoodman wrote: >> <johngoodman@earthlink.net> >> >> I found no cracks, and ordered the WD-1001K-MOD today from Van. They >> told me that it was backordered, so it will be a few weeks. I don't >> plan on installing it until my next Condition. >> John >> >> -------- >> #40572 Phase One complete in 2011 >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430197#430197 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ----- >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> >> > >


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:38:36 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Conduit in the wing
    From: "jeffwhip" <jeffwhip@me.com>
    I was wondering what size of conduit to buy? Did you buy it from Van's? Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430210#430210




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv10-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV10-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv10-list
  • Browse RV10-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --