Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 03:16 AM - Re: Manifold pressure with G3X (John Trollinger)
2. 04:07 AM - Re: Manifold pressure with G3X (Jesse Saint)
3. 06:12 AM - Re: Manifold pressure with G3X (Kelly McMullen)
4. 07:59 AM - Re: Antisplataero gust lock review (Albert)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Manifold pressure with G3X |
I have a G3X and my MP is pulled off of my #6 just fine
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 12:08 AM, bob88 <marty.crooks@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> Getting ready to hang the engine and trying to do as much as possible on
> the back end first. My question relates to the Vans recommendation that the
> manifold pressure line be connected to the port on cylinder #5. I have a
> used, overhauled engine with the MP port on #6. The plug on #5 doesn't want
> to come out, at least without extraordinary measures. So...is there a
> problem using #6 for the MP line with the Garmin engine sensor system? If
> so, any suggestions about getting the plug out of #5?
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=435587#435587
>
>
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Manifold pressure with G3X |
You can use the portion any cylinder. The port on #5 is just closer to the firewall.
Jesse Saint
I-TEC, Inc.
jesse@itecusa.org
www.itecusa.org
www.mavericklsa.com
C: 352-427-0285
O: 352-465-4545
F: 815-377-3694
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 11, 2014, at 12:08 AM, bob88 <marty.crooks@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
> Getting ready to hang the engine and trying to do as much as possible on the
back end first. My question relates to the Vans recommendation that the manifold
pressure line be connected to the port on cylinder #5. I have a used, overhauled
engine with the MP port on #6. The plug on #5 doesn't want to come out,
at least without extraordinary measures. So...is there a problem using #6 for
the MP line with the Garmin engine sensor system? If so, any suggestions about
getting the plug out of #5?
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=435587#435587
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Manifold pressure with G3X |
As Jesse says, it doesn't matter between cylinders. You could just as
easily use #3. The only difference is in the length of tubing to plumb to
where ever you mount the sensor. The FF plans just show mounting MP sensor
on the right side of the firewall, but there is nothing set in stone about
where you put it. I've seen #1 used for MP on a 4 cyl Lyc for a type
certificated aircraft.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Jesse Saint <jesse@saintaviation.com>
wrote:
>
> You can use the portion any cylinder. The port on #5 is just closer to the
> firewall.
>
> Jesse Saint
> I-TEC, Inc.
> jesse@itecusa.org
> www.itecusa.org
> www.mavericklsa.com
> C: 352-427-0285
> O: 352-465-4545
> F: 815-377-3694
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Dec 11, 2014, at 12:08 AM, bob88 <marty.crooks@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Getting ready to hang the engine and trying to do as much as possible on
> the back end first. My question relates to the Vans recommendation that the
> manifold pressure line be connected to the port on cylinder #5. I have a
> used, overhauled engine with the MP port on #6. The plug on #5 doesn't want
> to come out, at least without extraordinary measures. So...is there a
> problem using #6 for the MP line with the Garmin engine sensor system? If
> so, any suggestions about getting the plug out of #5?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Read this topic online here:
> >
> > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=435587#435587
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Antisplataero gust lock review |
There are cheaper but still effective gusts locks available.
Albert Gardner
N991RV
Yuma, AZ
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|