Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 06:03 AM - Re: Hose Interference (bill.peyton)
2. 06:20 AM - Re: Re: Hose Interference (Linn Walters)
3. 06:28 AM - Re: Re: Hose Interference (David Clifford)
4. 10:46 AM - Re: Re: Hose Interference (Bill Watson)
5. 10:53 AM - Hose Interference (Rich Hansen)
6. 11:10 AM - Re: Hose Interference (Linn Walters)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Hose Interference |
The moment of that extension will put a lot of stress on the output flange of the
heat muff. I have never heard of the interference problem before, nor did
I have one.
--------
Bill
WA0SYV
Aviation Partners, LLC
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438205#438205
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Hose Interference |
I agree .... I just looked at my installation (I'm still building) and
my scat tube doesn't come near interfering with anything. I suspect
that the scat tube Rich is installing might be cut too long. My scat
tube has a nice, graceful curve from the muff to the heat box.
Linn
On 2/10/2015 9:00 AM, bill.peyton wrote:
>
> The moment of that extension will put a lot of stress on the output flange of
the heat muff. I have never heard of the interference problem before, nor did
I have one.
>
> --------
> Bill
> WA0SYV
> Aviation Partners, LLC
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438205#438205
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>
>
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Hose Interference |
No alignment or interference with mine either.
----- Original Message -----
From: "bill.peyton" <peyton.b@sbcglobal.net>
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 9:00:38 AM
Subject: RV10-List: Re: Hose Interference
The moment of that extension will put a lot of stress on the output flange of the
heat muff. I have never heard of the interference problem before, nor did I
have one.
--------
Bill
WA0SYV
Aviation Partners, LLC
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438205#438205
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Hose Interference |
On 2/10/2015 9:16 AM, Linn Walters wrote:
> My scat tube has a nice, graceful curve from the muff to the heat box.
Well stated.
do not archive
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Hose Interference |
> Bob, agree scat tubing or scat "ducting" per ACS might have been better. Bottom
of my page says may not edit your post.
Bill, many have complained that the heat coming out of the front box is a bit much.
Possibly the 90 degree bend will decelerate the air flow creating a positive
outcome, but it is highly doubtful that it will cause the flange welds to
be ripped out of the heat muff. Is that what you meant?
Linn, in fitting this left side scat I started with a longer than desired piece.
Then progressively cut it down about an inch at a time, refitting and rechecking,
each time with an undesirable outcome. For my application it was: if
I clear the fuel line it hits the cooler, if I clear the cooler it hits the fuel
line, etc.
Look at Section FF6, page 5 in the plans. In the bottom middle picture it looks
like the scat may be hitting/rubbing against the oil cooler right behind the
crossover bracket. My plans are old & maybe things have changed. But, that's
about what I was dealing with. Wasn't interested in RTVing Air Seal Fabric
onto the hose as suggested on previous page.
Also, I should add that I do have SS aftermarket heat boxes and aftermarket cooler,
although I'm pretty sure their dimensions are the same as factory. Regarding
the fuel line, we probably all have somewhat similar installations, yet each
will be slightly different in routing, securing and final fit.
Didn't mean to stir the pot or create a problem for anyone, just offering up a
suggestion for fellow builders that appears to be a solution, not too expensive,
and/or that the elbow might be used somewhere else in someone's build - experimental!
PS: a 45 degree would be even better
Rich Hansen
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Hose Interference |
On 2/10/2015 1:50 PM, Rich Hansen wrote:
>
>
>> Bob, agree scat tubing or scat "ducting" per ACS might have been better. Bottom
of my page says may not edit your post.
> Bill, many have complained that the heat coming out of the front box is a bit
much.
You can cover some of the muff inlet on the baffle with some metal tape
to cut down the flow of air. My Grumman came from the factory that way
with no ill effects.
I used red RTV to glue a thin sheet of RTV on the heat valve to help
seal off the port through the firewall.
Linn
do not archive
>
snip
>
> Rich Hansen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|