Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 09:22 PM - PC680 vs PC925 (rvdave)
     2. 11:29 PM - Re: PC680 vs PC925 (Phillip Perry)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      I know theses are both good batteries that some are using.  Obviously the 925 is
      much better for starting but wondering if anyone has experience using the 680
      for starting?  I've been using one on a 4 cyl Lycoming with no problem but wondering
      about the 6 cyl?  I just did some testing on a Chevy van 6 cyl I have
      that needed a new battery, I have an older 10 year old 680 battery I had on the
      bench for shop projects I decided to try.  It does start my van in the winter
      cold but marginally because although it will turn over the engine adequately
      the clock will also reset to 12 o'clock sometimes, so I know this is marginal
      but may be attributed to the 10 year plus life.  So I ordered a 925 from amazon
      got a great deal, free freight and put in in my van to check it.  What a noticeable
      cranking difference--with authority!   Recently with this cold snap
      in Mi had a minus 27 deg morning and there was no hesitation with the 925 starting
      the van.  Sold on the 925 as very capable, but interested in the weight savings
      and I may have to get another new 680 to do the same test but thought I'd
      check others' experience with the 680 for starting.  Anyone with experience?
      
      --------
      Dave Ford
      RV6 for sale
      RV10 building
      Cadillac, MI
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438635#438635
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: PC680 vs PC925 | 
      
      
      There are folks running both successfully.  My system is dual batt with dual alts
      and have a 680 on both.  However I have a contractor that will allow me to
      bind them together in parallel if needed.  With that setup I can get redundancy,
      1360 for cold starting if required, and a backup starting battery in the event
      I show up to the hangar and have a dead primary battery. 
      
      My first engine start hasn't occurred yet, but I'm not worried about the 680  doing
      it based on other people's success with it in the -10. 
      
      I only point this out in case you happen to be running a dual-dual system.  If
      I were single battery though and in a cold climate I'd have a hard time turning
      my back on the 925 with all the lifting power the -10 provides. 
      
      Phil
      
      
      Sent from my iPhone
      
      > On Feb 23, 2015, at 11:19 PM, rvdave <rv610dave@gmail.com> wrote:
      > 
      > 
      > I know theses are both good batteries that some are using.  Obviously the 925
      is much better for starting but wondering if anyone has experience using the
      680 for starting?  I've been using one on a 4 cyl Lycoming with no problem but
      wondering about the 6 cyl?  I just did some testing on a Chevy van 6 cyl I have
      that needed a new battery, I have an older 10 year old 680 battery I had on
      the bench for shop projects I decided to try.  It does start my van in the winter
      cold but marginally because although it will turn over the engine adequately
      the clock will also reset to 12 o'clock sometimes, so I know this is marginal
      but may be attributed to the 10 year plus life.  So I ordered a 925 from amazon
      got a great deal, free freight and put in in my van to check it.  What a
      noticeable cranking difference--with authority!   Recently with this cold snap
      in Mi had a minus 27 deg morning and there was no hesitation with the 925 starting
      the van.  Sold on the 925 as very capable, but !
      > interested in the weight savings and I may have to get another new 680 to do
      the same test but thought I'd check others' experience with the 680 for starting.
      Anyone with experience?
      > 
      > --------
      > Dave Ford
      > RV6 for sale
      > RV10 building
      > Cadillac, MI
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > Read this topic online here:
      > 
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438635#438635
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |