RV10-List Digest Archive

Sat 03/14/15


Total Messages Posted: 7



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 07:35 AM - Has Low cost ADS-B arrived? (Kelly McMullen)
     2. 07:44 AM - Re: How to lift the nose wheel without an engine hoist (Bill Watson)
     3. 11:10 AM - Re: How to lift the nose wheel without an engine hoist (Rocketman1988)
     4. 11:53 AM - Re: Has Low cost ADS-B arrived? (Bob Turner)
     5. 12:25 PM - Re: Re: How to lift the nose wheel without an engine hoist (Kelly McMullen)
     6. 12:50 PM - Re: How to lift the nose wheel without an engine hoist (Bob Turner)
     7. 03:56 PM - Re: How to lift the nose wheel without an engine hoist (Rocketman1988)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:35:27 AM PST US
    From: Kelly McMullen <kellym@aviating.com>
    Subject: Has Low cost ADS-B arrived?
    Looks like there is a much cheaper option for those that haven't already invested. Of course there is much gnashing of teeth for the factory built aircraft. http://www.flyingmag.com/avionics-gear/instrumentaccessories/ads-b-compliance-699-its-true-sort <http://www.flyingmag.com/avionics-gear/instrumentaccessories/ads-b-compliance-699-its-true-sort> Kelly


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:44:09 AM PST US
    From: Bill Watson <Mauledriver@nc.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: How to lift the nose wheel without an engine hoist
    On 3/12/2015 10:14 AM, Marcus Cooper wrote: > > I havent tried it yet, but in the past some folks recommended filing a plastic tote with concrete and imbedding a hook in it. Sounds like a nice alternative to those of us without a eyelet in our hangar floor or the option to add one but can still pull the tail down. > If you look carefully you can see the concrete filled crate I embedded a hook in to winch the tail down to with a tie down strap. Even though I have the ubiqutous HF winch, I find it awkward for lifting the nose for this particular operation. BTW, I load the baggage compartment down with water bottles. Kitlog - tail raising and lowering <http://www.mykitlog.com/users/display_log.php?user=MauleDriver&project=224&category=7984&log=199155&row=2> You can also see how I used the HF wince to raise the tail and compress the donuts.


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:10:52 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: How to lift the nose wheel without an engine hoist
    From: "Rocketman1988" <Rocketman@etczone.com>
    Kelly said "...They are designed to secure the tail at a 45 degree pull angle for forces the horizontal stab can generate, not a direct pull vertically or horizontally..." Not to split hairs here, but that makes very little sense as basic physics tells us that the "45 degree pull angle" can be resolved by the summation of a horizontal and vertical components. Therefore, it matters not whether the force is applied vertically or at a 45 degree angle so long as the vertical force does not exceed any structural limitations. According to many that have tied the tail, it takes less than 250 lbs. The force that the stabilizer can produce is certainly greater than that. Of course, the stabilizer is mounted to distribute it load, so that needs to be considered. For me, I will have no issues borrowing the brick cart idea to secure the tail when necessary. YMMV. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=439378#439378


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:53:08 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Has Low cost ADS-B arrived?
    From: "Bob Turner" <bobturner@alum.rpi.edu>
    This just does not smell right. Whether normally certified or E-AB, FAR 91.225 and .227 apply to both equally. 91.227 requires that the position source meet certain standards. So far Navworks has not stated unequivocally that the gps meets those standards. And certainly almost no owner can so state with any authority. -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=439379#439379


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:25:22 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: How to lift the nose wheel without an engine hoist
    From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2@gmail.com>
    I don't disagree, however, the method of fastening the tiedown, the direction of pull etc do matter as to determining the actual structural strength. Whether rivets are in tension or shear matters. Same for the threads. If one loads the baggage compartment to lower the needed force, that side is good, but you need to protect against banging the tail on the floor. On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Rocketman1988 <Rocketman@etczone.com> wrote: > > Kelly said "...They are designed to secure the tail at a 45 degree pull > angle for forces the horizontal stab can generate, not a direct pull > vertically or horizontally..." > > Not to split hairs here, but that makes very little sense as basic physics > tells us that the "45 degree pull angle" can be resolved by the summation > of a horizontal and vertical components. Therefore, it matters not whether > the force is applied vertically or at a 45 degree angle so long as the > vertical force does not exceed any structural limitations. > > According to many that have tied the tail, it takes less than 250 lbs. > The force that the stabilizer can produce is certainly greater than that. > Of course, the stabilizer is mounted to distribute it load, so that needs > to be considered. For me, I will have no issues borrowing the brick cart > idea to secure the tail when necessary. > > YMMV. > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=439378#439378 > >


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:50:48 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: How to lift the nose wheel without an engine hoist
    From: "Bob Turner" <bobturner@alum.rpi.edu>
    I'd say you're both right, in some circumstances.(!) If you're talking about the structure (tailcone, spars, etc) then the ideal physics analysis is very good. At 45 degrees, 71% (actually one over the square root of two) of the force is vertical, and an equal amount is horizontal. But if you're talking about pulling out the threads, it is more complicated. The horizontal force will cause the bolt to pivot slightly, "locking" the bottom and top of the bolt deeper into the threads, where they are thicker, and thus have a lot more strength in tension. To visualize this, imagine that the tail had been tapped oversize, so the threads of the bolt just barely grabbed. -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=439382#439382


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:56:35 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: How to lift the nose wheel without an engine hoist
    From: "Rocketman1988" <Rocketman@etczone.com>
    Agreed. It is all just academic anyway because that tie down is threaded for a 3/8" bolt any unless you really messed up tapping the hole, 250 lbs is never going to pull those threads out... Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=439385#439385




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv10-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV10-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv10-list
  • Browse RV10-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --