RV10-List Digest Archive

Thu 07/23/15


Total Messages Posted: 11



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 11:43 AM - Re: Brake broke (Bill Watson)
     2. 12:06 PM - Declared Emergency (Jeff Carpenter)
     3. 12:44 PM - Re: Brake broke (Berck E. Nash)
     4. 03:54 PM - Brake broke (David Saylor)
     5. 04:39 PM - Re: Declared Emergency (Bill Watson)
     6. 05:01 PM - Re: Declared Emergency (Ben)
     7. 05:12 PM - Re: Declared Emergency (Justin Jones)
     8. 05:58 PM - Re: Brake broke (Jesse Saint)
     9. 06:17 PM - Re: Declared Emergency (Jack Philips)
    10. 07:54 PM - Re: Declared Emergency (Berck E. Nash)
    11. 10:33 PM - Re: Declared Emergency (David Saylor)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:43:56 AM PST US
    From: Bill Watson <Mauledriver@nc.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Brake broke
    Doing it the way tail draggers might do it makes sense to me but my interpretation is a bit different. Having moved from flying the Maule one day (actually 7 days/ week for a 2 months) to the '10 the next, I was all about rudder versus differential braking. For me that means constant rudder wagging. On grass it's stop to stop, on pavement it actually takes more concentration because it turns so easily with a xwind. But in both cases I try to keep it straight with minimal braking. Actual turns require braking. On the other hand, on pavement it often just rolls to fast. I never do a constant application of the brakes but tend to let the speed build then slow it way down and start over. Slow-fast-slow-fast etc. I got really long wear out of my brakes the first 3 years so by that measure it seems to work. Bill "declared my first emergency today" Watson On 7/22/2015 8:55 PM, David Saylor wrote: > Thanks folks. > > Jesse, I wish I'd read your post before I pulled the caliper. > > I had an enlightening conversation with Robbie Grove who explained the > required technique to me. Basically I learned I need to taxi kind of > like s-turning a tail dragger. Drift downwind (across the > taxiway) without any brakes, then just enough brake to get pointed to > the other side, and repeat as necessary. The brakes cool between steers. > > If anyone can explain it better, please do. > > Today I replaced the pads and the piston oring. Bled the brakes and > all seems well. Should be good for enough for a few landings to get > home, where I'll replace the disc and consider my upgrade options. > Even Cleveland says the brakes are undersized. > > EAA helped a LOT with everything I needed to make the repair. The > aircraft repair barn is well stocked with tools and supplies. > > Again thanks for the input. > > --Dave > > On Tuesday, July 21, 2015, Jesse Saint <jesse@saintaviation.com > <mailto:jesse@saintaviation.com>> wrote: > > As Coop said, it's more about technique than the brake kit, but > the Matco has double pads and should last longer. It most likely > just boiled the fluid and will harden back up when it cools down. > I wouldn't do anything for right now until you verify that. If it > firms up and you don't get a puddle by the brake, then you should > be good to go. When you get home you could replace pads and maybe > caliper. > > Jesse Saint > Saint Aviation, Inc. > 352-427-0285 > jesse@saintaviation.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jesse@saintaviation.com');> > > Sent from my iPad > > On Jul 21, 2015, at 3:19 PM, David Saylor <saylor.dave@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','saylor.dave@gmail.com');>> wrote: > >> We landed at OSH around noon. We landed 27 in a strong crosswind >> then taxied pretty far to the east, riding the brake as >> necessary. I guess my technique needs work because I think the >> right one overheated. By the time we got to HBP it was mushy, >> then a few seconds later it went to the floor. I stopped on the >> taxiway with the other brake. EAA tied us down on the cement at >> the end of P for repairs. >> >> I pulled the wheel pant and peeked under the cowl. The only sign >> of any loose fluid is out the top of the reservoir--quite a bit >> really. No leaks in the cabin. And the disc looks really bad, >> very scored and worn. The pads still have meat but they look sort >> of like the edges have chipped off. Maybe from heat. >> >> I replaced the right caliper a few years ago after it stranded us >> due to leaking. A new oring didn't help. Same brake again. >> >> Now I'm considering something other than Cleveland. Any suggestions? >> >> --Dave >> * >> >> D============================================ >> List"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> D============================================ >> //forums.matronics.com <http://forums.matronics.com> >> D============================================ >> ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> D============================================ >> >> * > > * > > get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > tp://forums.matronics.com > _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > * > > * > > > * > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> >


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:06:16 PM PST US
    From: Jeff Carpenter <jeff@westcottpress.com>
    Subject: Declared Emergency
    Do tell Bill... Jeff Carpenter 40304 On Jul 23, 2015, at 11:39 AM, Bill Watson wrote: > Doing it the way tail draggers might do it makes sense to me but my interpretation is a bit different. > > Having moved from flying the Maule one day (actually 7 days/ week for a 2 months) to the '10 the next, I was all about rudder versus differential braking. For me that means constant rudder wagging. On grass it's stop to stop, on pavement it actually takes more concentration because it turns so easily with a xwind. But in both cases I try to keep it straight with minimal braking. Actual turns require braking. > > On the other hand, on pavement it often just rolls to fast. I never do a constant application of the brakes but tend to let the speed build then slow it way down and start over. Slow-fast-slow-fast etc. > > I got really long wear out of my brakes the first 3 years so by that measure it seems to work. > > Bill "declared my first emergency today" Watson > > On 7/22/2015 8:55 PM, David Saylor wrote: >> Thanks folks. >> >> Jesse, I wish I'd read your post before I pulled the caliper. >> >> I had an enlightening conversation with Robbie Grove who explained the required technique to me. Basically I learned I need to taxi kind of like s-turning a tail dragger. Drift downwind (across the taxiway) without any brakes, then just enough brake to get pointed to the other side, and repeat as necessary. The brakes cool between steers. >> >> If anyone can explain it better, please do. >> >> Today I replaced the pads and the piston oring. Bled the brakes and all seems well. Should be good for enough for a few landings to get home, where I'll replace the disc and consider my upgrade options. Even Cleveland says the brakes are undersized. >> >> EAA helped a LOT with everything I needed to make the repair. The aircraft repair barn is well stocked with tools and supplies. >> >> Again thanks for the input. >> >> --Dave >> >> On Tuesday, July 21, 2015, Jesse Saint <jesse@saintaviation.com> wrote: >> As Coop said, it's more about technique than the brake kit, but the Matco has double pads and should last longer. It most likely just boiled the fluid and will harden back up when it cools down. I wouldn't do anything for right now until you verify that. If it firms up and you don't get a puddle by the brake, then you should be good to go. When you get home you could replace pads and maybe caliper. >> >> Jesse Saint >> Saint Aviation, Inc. >> 352-427-0285 >> jesse@saintaviation.com >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On Jul 21, 2015, at 3:19 PM, David Saylor <saylor.dave@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> We landed at OSH around noon. We landed 27 in a strong crosswind then taxied pretty far to the east, riding the brake as necessary. I guess my technique needs work because I think the right one overheated. By the time we got to HBP it was mushy, then a few seconds later it went to the floor. I stopped on the taxiway with the other brake. EAA tied us down on the cement at the end of P for repairs. >>> >>> I pulled the wheel pant and peeked under the cowl. The only sign of any loose fluid is out the top of the reservoir--quite a bit really. No leaks in the cabin. And the disc looks really bad, very scored and worn. The pads still have meat but they look sort of like the edges have chipped off. Maybe from heat. >>> >>> I replaced the right caliper a few years ago after it stranded us due to leaking. A new oring didn't help. Same brake again. >>> >>> Now I'm considering something other than Cleveland. Any suggestions? >>> >>> --Dave >>> >>> >>> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D >>> List"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >>> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D >>> //forums.matronics.com >>> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D >>> ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >>> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D >>> >> >> >> get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> tp://forums.matronics.com >> _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> >> >> >> >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Date: 07/19/15 >> > > > > Westcott Press 1121 Isabel Street Burbank, CA 91506 jeff@westcottpress.com 818-861-7300


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:44:39 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Brake broke
    From: "Berck E. Nash" <flyboy@gmail.com>
    I don't have any real time in an RV-10, but I have taxied one briefly, and it taxies very similar to other castering nosewheel aircraft I've flown. After teaching a few hundred air force cadets to fly a DA-20, I can state that most people naturally do it wrong. It's very tempting to control the direction of the airplane exclusively with the brakes, but in most cases you should not need the brakes when taxiing in a straight line. The rudder has more authority than you think it does, but you need to be quick on your feet, and not hesitate to use full rudder. The best way to save your brakes is to make sure you're never touching the brakes to turn unless you already have the rudder to the stop in that direction. I find that keeping the plane straight requires frequent, large applications of rudder applied as soon as the aircraft heads the wrong direction, but can be done in most conditions without any use of the brakes. If you find that you need to drag the brakes in order to taxi in a straight line, I suspect that you're not using all the rudder available. Note that you'll also get more rudder authority if you're positioning the ailerons correctly for wind direction. Now, in a 20 knot xwind, you probably need brakes, but 10 knots should be no big deal. If you do need brakes, do not drag them. Light, continuous brake actuation creates a lot more heat than brief, moderate application. If you need to drag the brakes, don't. Hold full rudder in the direction you need, and tap the brakes moderately and briefly as necessary to point the plane back downwind, let it weathervane back (while still holding full rudder), then tap it again to overcorrect back toward center and repeat. Note that I have no experience about what's necessary on grass, but I wouldn't think it would be much different. Hope this helps, Berck On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Bill Watson <Mauledriver@nc.rr.com> wrote: > Doing it the way tail draggers might do it makes sense to me but my > interpretation is a bit different. > > Having moved from flying the Maule one day (actually 7 days/ week for a 2 > months) to the '10 the next, I was all about rudder versus differential > braking. For me that means constant rudder wagging. On grass it's stop to > stop, on pavement it actually takes more concentration because it turns so > easily with a xwind. But in both cases I try to keep it straight with > minimal braking. Actual turns require braking. > > On the other hand, on pavement it often just rolls to fast. I never do a > constant application of the brakes but tend to let the speed build then > slow it way down and start over. Slow-fast-slow-fast etc. > > I got really long wear out of my brakes the first 3 years so by that > measure it seems to work. > > Bill "declared my first emergency today" Watson > > > On 7/22/2015 8:55 PM, David Saylor wrote: > > Thanks folks. > > Jesse, I wish I'd read your post before I pulled the caliper. > > I had an enlightening conversation with Robbie Grove who explained the > required technique to me. Basically I learned I need to taxi kind of like > s-turning a tail dragger. Drift downwind (across the taxiway) without any > brakes, then just enough brake to get pointed to the other side, and repeat > as necessary. The brakes cool between steers. > > If anyone can explain it better, please do. > > Today I replaced the pads and the piston oring. Bled the brakes and all > seems well. Should be good for enough for a few landings to get home, where > I'll replace the disc and consider my upgrade options. Even Cleveland says > the brakes are undersized. > > EAA helped a LOT with everything I needed to make the repair. The > aircraft repair barn is well stocked with tools and supplies. > > Again thanks for the input. > > --Dave > > On Tuesday, July 21, 2015, Jesse Saint <jesse@saintaviation.com> wrote: > >> As Coop said, it's more about technique than the brake kit, but the >> Matco has double pads and should last longer. It most likely just boiled >> the fluid and will harden back up when it cools down. I wouldn't do >> anything for right now until you verify that. If it firms up and you don't >> get a puddle by the brake, then you should be good to go. When you get home >> you could replace pads and maybe caliper. >> >> Jesse Saint >> Saint Aviation, Inc. >> 352-427-0285 >> jesse@saintaviation.com >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On Jul 21, 2015, at 3:19 PM, David Saylor <saylor.dave@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> We landed at OSH around noon. We landed 27 in a strong crosswind then >> taxied pretty far to the east, riding the brake as necessary. I guess my >> technique needs work because I think the right one overheated. By the time >> we got to HBP it was mushy, then a few seconds later it went to the floor. >> I stopped on the taxiway with the other brake. EAA tied us down on the >> cement at the end of P for repairs. >> >> I pulled the wheel pant and peeked under the cowl. The only sign of >> any loose fluid is out the top of the reservoir--quite a bit really. No >> leaks in the cabin. And the disc looks really bad, very scored and worn. >> The pads still have meat but they look sort of like the edges have >> chipped off. Maybe from heat. >> >> I replaced the right caliper a few years ago after it stranded us due >> to leaking. A new oring didn't help. Same brake again. >> >> Now I'm considering something other than Cleveland. Any suggestions? >> >> --Dave >> >> * >> >> D============================================ >> List"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List <http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List> >> D============================================ >> //forums.matronics.com <http://forums.matronics.com> >> D============================================ >> ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution <http://www.matronics.com/contribution> >> D============================================ >> >> * >> >> * >> >> get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List <http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List> >> tp://forums.matronics.com <http://forums.matronics.com> >> _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution <http://www.matronics.com/contribution> >> >> * >> >> > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Date: 07/19/15 > > > * > > > * > >


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:54:46 PM PST US
    Subject: Brake broke
    From: David Saylor <saylor.dave@gmail.com>
    Bill and Berck, thank you, your descriptions are what I'm hearing elsewhere too. It's funny how a specific situation can be so rare ( for me) and also so common. I'm approaching 1000 hours in the 10 but the long xwind taxi just never came up. Can't wait to try it again. And Bill, you know you can't just leave it at that... --Dave On Thursday, July 23, 2015, Bill Watson <Mauledriver@nc.rr.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Mauledriver@nc.rr.com');>> wrote: > Doing it the way tail draggers might do it makes sense to me but my > interpretation is a bit different. > > Having moved from flying the Maule one day (actually 7 days/ week for a 2 > months) to the '10 the next, I was all about rudder versus differential > braking. For me that means constant rudder wagging. On grass it's stop to > stop, on pavement it actually takes more concentration because it turns so > easily with a xwind. But in both cases I try to keep it straight with > minimal braking. Actual turns require braking. > > On the other hand, on pavement it often just rolls to fast. I never do a > constant application of the brakes but tend to let the speed build then > slow it way down and start over. Slow-fast-slow-fast etc. > > I got really long wear out of my brakes the first 3 years so by that > measure it seems to work. > > Bill "declared my first emergency today" Watson > > On 7/22/2015 8:55 PM, David Saylor wrote: > > Thanks folks. > > Jesse, I wish I'd read your post before I pulled the caliper. > > I had an enlightening conversation with Robbie Grove who explained the > required technique to me. Basically I learned I need to taxi kind of like > s-turning a tail dragger. Drift downwind (across the taxiway) without any > brakes, then just enough brake to get pointed to the other side, and repeat > as necessary. The brakes cool between steers. > > If anyone can explain it better, please do. > > Today I replaced the pads and the piston oring. Bled the brakes and all > seems well. Should be good for enough for a few landings to get home, where > I'll replace the disc and consider my upgrade options. Even Cleveland says > the brakes are undersized. > > EAA helped a LOT with everything I needed to make the repair. The > aircraft repair barn is well stocked with tools and supplies. > > Again thanks for the input. > > --Dave > > On Tuesday, July 21, 2015, Jesse Saint <jesse@saintaviation.com> wrote: > >> As Coop said, it's more about technique than the brake kit, but the >> Matco has double pads and should last longer. It most likely just boiled >> the fluid and will harden back up when it cools down. I wouldn't do >> anything for right now until you verify that. If it firms up and you don't >> get a puddle by the brake, then you should be good to go. When you get home >> you could replace pads and maybe caliper. >> >> Jesse Saint >> Saint Aviation, Inc. >> 352-427-0285 >> jesse@saintaviation.com >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On Jul 21, 2015, at 3:19 PM, David Saylor <saylor.dave@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> We landed at OSH around noon. We landed 27 in a strong crosswind then >> taxied pretty far to the east, riding the brake as necessary. I guess my >> technique needs work because I think the right one overheated. By the time >> we got to HBP it was mushy, then a few seconds later it went to the floor. >> I stopped on the taxiway with the other brake. EAA tied us down on the >> cement at the end of P for repairs. >> >> I pulled the wheel pant and peeked under the cowl. The only sign of >> any loose fluid is out the top of the reservoir--quite a bit really. No >> leaks in the cabin. And the disc looks really bad, very scored and worn. >> The pads still have meat but they look sort of like the edges have >> chipped off. Maybe from heat. >> >> I replaced the right caliper a few years ago after it stranded us due >> to leaking. A new oring didn't help. Same brake again. >> >> Now I'm considering something other than Cleveland. Any suggestions? >> >> --Dave >> >> * >> >> D============================================ >> List"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List <http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List> >> D============================================ >> //forums.matronics.com <http://forums.matronics.com> >> D============================================ >> ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution <http://www.matronics.com/contribution> >> D============================================ >> >> * >> >> * >> >> get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List <http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List> >> tp://forums.matronics.com <http://forums.matronics.com> >> _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution <http://www.matronics.com/contribution> >> >> * >> >> > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Date: 07/19/15 > > > * > > > * > >


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:39:54 PM PST US
    From: Bill Watson <Mauledriver@nc.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Declared Emergency
    Yes, so today I had what I think was my first in-flight problem with my '10 and it resulted in a declared emergency and precautionary landing. No big deal but an interesting experience. Flying home this morning from Pittsburgh to Durham NC, we had entered IMC conditions as we approached a wad of early morning cells. I requested a climb and a deviation in an effort to find VMC before getting too close to the cells. In the ever continuing effort to maintain hand flying skills with an extremely capable 2 axis autopilot, I decided to hand fly the plane and enjoy the challenge of flying to standard in light convective chop. Flightaware Information <http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N215TG/history/20150723/1215Z/KAGC/KLYH#> At one point I decided to let Tiger fly it for awhile so I could figure out my next move. Tiger immediately began a diving turn so I switched him off and resumed hand flying. Figuring that I had missed one of the buttons during my transition, I did another Direct-to and made sure I was exactly on altitude before giving it back to Tiger. Tiger performed another diving altitude excursion. Both excursions exceeded 200' but they were not called out by ATC (nor are they visible in the Flightaware track). It took a minute or two to figure out what the problem was; I had lost an accurate airspeed indication. This is not a particularly big problem other then it rendered my autopilot unusable (I have not yet explored whether or how my Trutrak unit could have been used in some degraded mode without a good airspeed indication). I told ATC that I had a problem with my airspeed indicator and I requested vectors and a descent to VMC and a landing. I was given a turn and a descent by the controller and was asked whether I was declaring an emergency. I said "yes". Very quickly a more sure voiced controller took over and directed me to lovely Lynchburg Regional. I broke out into hazy VMC at 5,000' over familiar territory. I fly over Lynchburg on many trips but hoped to never have to land there. During the steep straight-in approach to Runway 4 I noted that both my GRT EFIS with dual AHRS and the backup airspeed indicator were giving erroneous readings. Since they only share the pitot feed upstream of the dual AHRS connection, problem determination should be simple and is likely water. I'll let you all know what I find. Some thoughts: * I'm lucky and glad that the failure occurred while hand flying. If Tiger had been flying, it could have been much more confusing. Having said that, Tiger does 99% of my flying. * Declaring an emergency, even if done reluctantly, clears the mind along with the airspace. Loss of airspeed in IMC is no big deal but once detected, it's nice to be able to focus on flying the plane without other distractions (once you answer the standard 'souls on board' and 'fuel' questions) * I recall a few discussions regarding the '10's mechanical stall warning system. Mine is in place and operational. It was a comfort knowing it was there as a backstop during my approach and landing. I'm glad I put it in. * Darn the '10 is a sweet plane!! That's it so far. Need to go fill out an ASRS report. > Bill "declared my first emergency today" Watson


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:01:32 PM PST US
    From: "Ben" <n801bh@netzero.net>
    Subject: Re: Declared Emergency
    Good job buddy....... Ben Haas N801BH www.haaspowerair.com ---------- Original Message ---------- From: Bill Watson <Mauledriver@nc.rr.com> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Declared Emergency Yes, so today I had what I think was my first in-flight problem with my '10 and it resulted in a declared emergency and precautionary landing. No big deal but an interesting experience. Flying home this morning from Pittsburgh to Durham NC, we had entered I MC conditions as we approached a wad of early morning cells. I requeste d a climb and a deviation in an effort to find VMC before getting too c lose to the cells. In the ever continuing effort to maintain hand flyi ng skills with an extremely capable 2 axis autopilot, I decided to hand fly the plane and enjoy the challenge of flying to standard in light con vective chop. Flightaware Information At one point I decided to let Tiger fly it for awhile so I could figure out my next move. Tiger immediately began a diving turn so I switched him off and resumed hand flying. Figuring that I had missed one of the b uttons during my transition, I did another Direct-to and made sure I was exactly on altitude before giving it back to Tiger. Tiger performed an other diving altitude excursion. Both excursions exceeded 200' but they were not called out by ATC (nor are they visible in the Flightaware track). It took a minute or two to figure out what the problem was; I had lost an accurate airspeed indica tion. This is not a particularly big problem other then it rendered my autopi lot unusable (I have not yet explored whether or how my Trutrak unit cou ld have been used in some degraded mode without a good airspeed indicati on). I told ATC that I had a problem with my airspeed indicator and I reques ted vectors and a descent to VMC and a landing. I was given a turn and a descent by the controller and was asked whether I was declaring an eme rgency. I said "yes". Very quickly a more sure voiced controller took over and directed me to lovely Lynchburg Regional. I broke out into haz y VMC at 5,000' over familiar territory. I fly over Lynchburg on many t rips but hoped to never have to land there. During the steep straight-in approach to Runway 4 I noted that both my GRT EFIS with dual AHRS and the backup airspeed indicator were giving er roneous readings. Since they only share the pitot feed upstream of the dual AHRS connection, problem determination should be simple and is like ly water. I'll let you all know what I find. Some thoughts: I'm lucky and glad that the failure occurred while hand flying. If Tige r had been flying, it could have been much more confusing. Having said that, Tiger does 99% of my flying. Declaring an emergency, even if done reluctantly, clears the mind along with the airspace. Loss of airspeed in IMC is no big deal but once det ected, it's nice to be able to focus on flying the plane without other d istractions (once you answer the standard 'souls on board' and 'fuel' qu estions) I recall a few discussions regarding the '10's mechanical stall warning system. Mine is in place and operational. It was a comfort knowing it was there as a backstop during my approach and landing. I'm glad I put it in. Darn the '10 is a sweet plane!! That's it so far. Need to go fill out an ASRS report.Bill "declared my first emergency today" Watson ======================== ======================== ======================== ======================== ======================== ======================== ======================== ======= ____________________________________________________________ Old School Yearbook Pics View Class Yearbooks Online Free. Search by School & Year. Look Now! http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/55b17f9033dce7f90470bst01duc


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:12:46 PM PST US
    From: Justin Jones <jmjones2000@mindspring.com>
    Subject: Re: Declared Emergency
    This brings up a great point and an excellent technique. During flight testi ng or at any point, it is a good idea to establish and have known pitch and p ower settings for different configurations and phases of flight. For instanc e, if you know that 2400 RPM, 18" of manifold pressure and 2 degrees nose hi gh will give you 100 kts with flaps up, and that a notch of flaps, 15" manif old pressure and 1 degree nose low will give you a 600 fpm descent rate at 1 00 kts, you have an target to shoot for and it can help to keep you alive du ring these kinds of emergencies (no airspeed indication) where you can not r e-enter vmc flight. The Air Force, the Navy, civilian King Air medevac companies, and even my cu rrent job flying 747s all taught this concept of flying. Know your pitch and power settings and watch how easy flying becomes. Justin > On Jul 23, 2015, at 19:36, Bill Watson <Mauledriver@nc.rr.com> wrote: > > Yes, so today I had what I think was my first in-flight problem with my '1 0 and it resulted in a declared emergency and precautionary landing. No big deal but an interesting experience. > > Flying home this morning from Pittsburgh to Durham NC, we had entered IMC c onditions as we approached a wad of early morning cells. I requested a clim b and a deviation in an effort to find VMC before getting too close to the c ells. In the ever continuing effort to maintain hand flying skills with an extremely capable 2 axis autopilot, I decided to hand fly the plane and enj oy the challenge of flying to standard in light convective chop. > Flightaware Information > > At one point I decided to let Tiger fly it for awhile so I could figure ou t my next move. Tiger immediately began a diving turn so I switched him off and resumed hand flying. Figuring that I had missed one of the buttons duri ng my transition, I did another Direct-to and made sure I was exactly on alt itude before giving it back to Tiger. Tiger performed another diving altitu de excursion. > > Both excursions exceeded 200' but they were not called out by ATC (nor ar e they visible in the Flightaware track). It took a minute or two to figure out what the problem was; I had lost an accurate airspeed indication. > > This is not a particularly big problem other then it rendered my autopilot unusable (I have not yet explored whether or how my Trutrak unit could have been used in some degraded mode without a good airspeed indication). > > I told ATC that I had a problem with my airspeed indicator and I requested vectors and a descent to VMC and a landing. I was given a turn and a desce nt by the controller and was asked whether I was declaring an emergency. I s aid "yes". Very quickly a more sure voiced controller took over and directe d me to lovely Lynchburg Regional. I broke out into hazy VMC at 5,000' over familiar territory. I fly over Lynchburg on many trips but hoped to never h ave to land there. > > During the steep straight-in approach to Runway 4 I noted that both my GRT EFIS with dual AHRS and the backup airspeed indicator were giving erroneous readings. Since they only share the pitot feed upstream of the dual AHRS c onnection, problem determination should be simple and is likely water. I'll let you all know what I find. > > Some thoughts: > I'm lucky and glad that the failure occurred while hand flying. If Tiger h ad been flying, it could have been much more confusing. Having said that, T iger does 99% of my flying. > Declaring an emergency, even if done reluctantly, clears the mind along wi th the airspace. Loss of airspeed in IMC is no big deal but once detected, it's nice to be able to focus on flying the plane without other distraction s (once you answer the standard 'souls on board' and 'fuel' questions) > I recall a few discussions regarding the '10's mechanical stall warning sy stem. Mine is in place and operational. It was a comfort knowing it was th ere as a backstop during my approach and landing. I'm glad I put it in. > Darn the '10 is a sweet plane!! > That's it so far. Need to go fill out an ASRS report. >> Bill "declared my first emergency today" Watson > > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= >


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:58:24 PM PST US
    From: Jesse Saint <jesse@saintaviation.com>
    Subject: Re: Brake broke
    "The rudder has more authority than you think it does, but you need to be quick on your feet, and not hesitate to use full rudder. The best way to save your brakes is to make sure you're never touching the brakes to turn unless you already have the rudder to the stop in that direction." Exactly. Heals on the floor, full rudder deflection, a little bit of toe pressure as needed. No more than 1,000 rpm on hard surface for taxi. Pump brakes to slow down or stop. Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. 352-427-0285 jesse@saintaviation.com Sent from my iPad > On Jul 23, 2015, at 3:41 PM, Berck E. Nash <flyboy@gmail.com> wrote: > > The rudder has more authority than you think it does, but you need to be quick on your feet, and not hesitate to use full rudder. The best way to save your brakes is to make sure you're never touching the brakes to turn unless you already have the rudder to the stop in that direction.


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:17:29 PM PST US
    From: "Jack Philips" <jack@bedfordlandings.com>
    Subject: Declared Emergency
    Very interesting. Do you by chance have ForeFlight on your i-Pad with a Stratus 2s? One reason I bought that setup was to give me a set of backup instruments in case everything else went south (the Stratus 2s has a built in AHRS). Of course it would be referencing the GPS and reading groundspeed, not airspeed, but it should be close. I've always found the folks at KLYH Tower to be friendly and courteous. Glad they could help you. Jack Phillips #40610 - Fuselage and finally getting back to work on my RV-10 after a 3-year hiatus From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill Watson Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 7:36 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Declared Emergency Yes, so today I had what I think was my first in-flight problem with my '10 and it resulted in a declared emergency and precautionary landing. No big deal but an interesting experience. Flying home this morning from Pittsburgh to Durham NC, we had entered IMC conditions as we approached a wad of early morning cells. I requested a climb and a deviation in an effort to find VMC before getting too close to the cells. In the ever continuing effort to maintain hand flying skills with an extremely capable 2 axis autopilot, I decided to hand fly the plane and enjoy the challenge of flying to standard in light convective chop. Flightaware Information <http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N215TG/history/20150723/1215Z/KAGC/KLYH> At one point I decided to let Tiger fly it for awhile so I could figure out my next move. Tiger immediately began a diving turn so I switched him off and resumed hand flying. Figuring that I had missed one of the buttons during my transition, I did another Direct-to and made sure I was exactly on altitude before giving it back to Tiger. Tiger performed another diving altitude excursion. Both excursions exceeded 200' but they were not called out by ATC (nor are they visible in the Flightaware track). It took a minute or two to figure out what the problem was; I had lost an accurate airspeed indication. This is not a particularly big problem other then it rendered my autopilot unusable (I have not yet explored whether or how my Trutrak unit could have been used in some degraded mode without a good airspeed indication). I told ATC that I had a problem with my airspeed indicator and I requested vectors and a descent to VMC and a landing. I was given a turn and a descent by the controller and was asked whether I was declaring an emergency. I said "yes". Very quickly a more sure voiced controller took over and directed me to lovely Lynchburg Regional. I broke out into hazy VMC at 5,000' over familiar territory. I fly over Lynchburg on many trips but hoped to never have to land there. During the steep straight-in approach to Runway 4 I noted that both my GRT EFIS with dual AHRS and the backup airspeed indicator were giving erroneous readings. Since they only share the pitot feed upstream of the dual AHRS connection, problem determination should be simple and is likely water. I'll let you all know what I find. Some thoughts: * I'm lucky and glad that the failure occurred while hand flying. If Tiger had been flying, it could have been much more confusing. Having said that, Tiger does 99% of my flying. * Declaring an emergency, even if done reluctantly, clears the mind along with the airspace. Loss of airspeed in IMC is no big deal but once detected, it's nice to be able to focus on flying the plane without other distractions (once you answer the standard 'souls on board' and 'fuel' questions) * I recall a few discussions regarding the '10's mechanical stall warning system. Mine is in place and operational. It was a comfort knowing it was there as a backstop during my approach and landing. I'm glad I put it in. * Darn the '10 is a sweet plane!! That's it so far. Need to go fill out an ASRS report. Bill "declared my first emergency today" Watson


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:54:44 PM PST US
    From: "Berck E. Nash" <flyboy@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Declared Emergency
    On 07/23/2015 05:36 PM, Bill Watson wrote: > During the steep straight-in approach to Runway 4 I noted that both my > GRT EFIS with dual AHRS and the backup airspeed indicator were giving > erroneous readings. Since they only share the pitot feed upstream of > the dual AHRS connection, problem determination should be simple and is > likely water. I'll let you all know what I find. First, kudos on analyzing the situation, taking appropriate action and getting the aircraft back on the ground in one piece. An incorrect airspeed indication in IMC has killed lots of folks. (Air France 407...) Excellent job not becoming the most recent; I hope if I ever find myself in the same situation I perform as well as you did. Now for some questions... I assume they also share a static line? I'm a little confused about why the autopilot would use airspeed to hold altitude? I, admittedly, know nothing about how autopilots work, but it seems like if I were programming an autopilot I'd have it track a pressure a altitude to hold an altitude. I have flown a plane with a blocked static line... (Instrument instructor stuck tape over the single static port without telling me.) It was a good experience. First thing I noticed was not the sluggish altimeter on climbout, but rather the decreasing airspeed indication while maintaining a pitch attitude and power setting in a 172 that should have resulted in a climb. I eventually deduced pitot/static system failure, switched to alternate static source, and there was no change. The failure of the alternate static source to fix the problem was never adequately explained to me, and surprised the hell out of my instructor. After I leveled off, the static system leaked to the right altitude and all appeared normal until I tried to descend, at which point the airspeed indicator quickly read about 100 knots fast. I landed by taking off my foggles and looking outside the airplane using pitch/power and erring on the side of landing fast on a long runway. Had it been IMC, I don't know how well it would have gone. Anyway, I mention all this to say... are you sure it isn't a static line with partial blockage? Berck


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:33:17 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Declared Emergency
    From: David Saylor <saylor.dave@gmail.com>
    Bill, I'm happy for your happy ending. Good job flying the airplane. I've seen one RV with a soggy pitot. It behaved as you described. Always looKing forward to more of your sigs, --Dave On Thursday, July 23, 2015, Bill Watson <Mauledriver@nc.rr.com> wrote: > Yes, so today I had what I think was my first in-flight problem with my > '10 and it resulted in a declared emergency and precautionary landing. No > big deal but an interesting experience. > > Flying home this morning from Pittsburgh to Durham NC, we had entered IMC > conditions as we approached a wad of early morning cells. I requested a > climb and a deviation in an effort to find VMC before getting too close to > the cells. In the ever continuing effort to maintain hand flying skills > with an extremely capable 2 axis autopilot, I decided to hand fly the plane > and enjoy the challenge of flying to standard in light convective chop. > Flightaware Information > <http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N215TG/history/20150723/1215Z/KAGC/KLYH#> > > At one point I decided to let Tiger fly it for awhile so I could figure > out my next move. Tiger immediately began a diving turn so I switched him > off and resumed hand flying. Figuring that I had missed one of the buttons > during my transition, I did another Direct-to and made sure I was exactly > on altitude before giving it back to Tiger. Tiger performed another diving > altitude excursion. > > Both excursions exceeded 200' but they were not called out by ATC (nor > are they visible in the Flightaware track). It took a minute or two to > figure out what the problem was; I had lost an accurate airspeed indication. > > This is not a particularly big problem other then it rendered my autopilot > unusable (I have not yet explored whether or how my Trutrak unit could have > been used in some degraded mode without a good airspeed indication). > > I told ATC that I had a problem with my airspeed indicator and I requested > vectors and a descent to VMC and a landing. I was given a turn and a > descent by the controller and was asked whether I was declaring an > emergency. I said "yes". Very quickly a more sure voiced controller took > over and directed me to lovely Lynchburg Regional. I broke out into hazy > VMC at 5,000' over familiar territory. I fly over Lynchburg on many trips > but hoped to never have to land there. > > During the steep straight-in approach to Runway 4 I noted that both my GRT > EFIS with dual AHRS and the backup airspeed indicator were giving erroneous > readings. Since they only share the pitot feed upstream of the dual AHRS > connection, problem determination should be simple and is likely water. > I'll let you all know what I find. > > Some thoughts: > > - I'm lucky and glad that the failure occurred while hand flying. If > Tiger had been flying, it could have been much more confusing. Having said > that, Tiger does 99% of my flying. > - Declaring an emergency, even if done reluctantly, clears the mind > along with the airspace. Loss of airspeed in IMC is no big deal but once > detected, it's nice to be able to focus on flying the plane without other > distractions (once you answer the standard 'souls on board' and 'fuel' > questions) > - I recall a few discussions regarding the '10's mechanical stall > warning system. Mine is in place and operational. It was a comfort > knowing it was there as a backstop during my approach and landing. I'm > glad I put it in. > - Darn the '10 is a sweet plane!! > > That's it so far. Need to go fill out an ASRS report. > > Bill "declared my first emergency today" Watson > > > * > > > * > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv10-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV10-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv10-list
  • Browse RV10-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --