Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 05:36 AM - Re: Cowl Flaps (Bill Watson)
2. 06:54 AM - Re: Cowl Flaps (Shannon Hicks)
3. 07:00 AM - Re: Cowl Flaps (Kelly McMullen)
4. 07:02 AM - Oil temps (Shannon Hicks)
5. 07:05 AM - Re: Cowl Flaps (Alan Mekler MD)
6. 07:27 AM - Re: Oil temps (building_partner)
7. 07:32 AM - Re: Oil temps (Jesse Saint)
8. 07:50 AM - Re: Cowl Flaps (Shannon Hicks)
9. 08:41 AM - Re: Oil temps (Bill Watson)
10. 01:39 PM - Re: Oil temps (Albert)
11. 01:51 PM - Wet Dog Syndrome On Shutdown (Sean Stephens)
12. 02:10 PM - Re: Wet Dog Syndrome On Shutdown (Bruce Johnson)
13. 03:32 PM - Re: Wet Dog Syndrome On Shutdown (Deems Davis)
14. 03:42 PM - Re: Wet Dog Syndrome On Shutdown (Sean Stephens)
15. 03:59 PM - Re: Wet Dog Syndrome On Shutdown (Jesse Saint)
16. 04:20 PM - Re: Wet Dog Syndrome On Shutdown (Sean Stephens)
17. 05:51 PM - Re: Wet Dog Syndrome On Shutdown (Jesse Saint)
18. 06:46 PM - Re: Wet Dog Syndrome On Shutdown (Sean Stephens)
19. 07:26 PM - Re: Wet Dog Syndrome On Shutdown (Berck E. Nash)
20. 07:40 PM - Re: Wet Dog Syndrome On Shutdown (P Reid)
21. 08:06 PM - Re: Wet Dog Syndrome On Shutdown (Kelly McMullen)
22. 08:10 PM - Re: Wet Dog Syndrome On Shutdown (Kelly McMullen)
23. 09:19 PM - Re: Wet Dog Syndrome On Shutdown (Sean Stephens)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Just as a data point, I did exactly that (90, heat soaked, climb to 9).
I did have one cylinder hit 400 but the rest stayed under 380 as they
always do. Having problems with cylinder 1 which breaks 380 regularly
climbing out during our southern summers.
But this is a stock '10 with a stock IO-540 pulling 2600rpms with a
stock 2 bladed prop. I normally climb at 135 and start dialing back the
speed to 125 by 9k.
Bill "thinking the important number during the climb is reaching 70F" Watson
On 6/13/2016 9:02 PM, Kelly McMullen wrote:
> I don't suppose you were starting from ground temps of 85-90, much
> less departing with an engine that had already been hot soaked during
> a refuel stop. I expect this weekend I will be doing at least on
> takeoff with surface temps above 100.
>
> -sent from the microchip implanted in my forearm
>
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Shannon Hicks <civeng123@gmail.com
> <mailto:civeng123@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I have the stock louvers installed and have had absolutely no
> temperature issues on climb out. Friday I climbed straight
> to 11.5k at 120kts and none of my cylinders even came close to 400.
>
> Shannon
>
>
> On Monday, June 13, 2016, Kelly McMullen <apilot2@gmail.com
> <mailto:apilot2@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Thanks Ed. Very helpful. I guess that shows the stock louvers
> are not that effective. I was thinking of putting the cowl
> flaps outside the louvers. I will have to but a 3-D template
> to verify muffler clearance, but looked okay this morning,
> just eyeballing it.
>
>
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Kelly,
The ground temp was just north of 90 degrees. The difference may be that I
have a plenum instead of the baffle seals. Once I reach 1000' I pull back
the power to around 25" & 2500 rpm and lean to keep the same get as
takeoff.
Shannon
On Monday, June 13, 2016, Kelly McMullen <apilot2@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't suppose you were starting from ground temps of 85-90, much less
> departing with an engine that had already been hot soaked during a refuel
> stop. I expect this weekend I will be doing at least on takeoff with
> surface temps above 100.
>
> -sent from the microchip implanted in my forearm
>
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Shannon Hicks <civeng123@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','civeng123@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> I have the stock louvers installed and have had absolutely no temperature
>> issues on climb out. Friday I climbed straight to 11.5k at 120kts and none
>> of my cylinders even came close to 400.
>>
>> Shannon
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, June 13, 2016, Kelly McMullen <apilot2@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','apilot2@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Ed. Very helpful. I guess that shows the stock louvers are not
>>> that effective. I was thinking of putting the cowl flaps outside the
>>> louvers. I will have to but a 3-D template to verify muffler clearance, but
>>> looked okay this morning, just eyeballing it.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
OK, that explains a lot. Did you fabricate the plenum or purchase it? If
purchased, which vendor? I only have the stock baffle seals.
On 6/14/2016 6:54 AM, Shannon Hicks wrote:
> Kelly,
> The ground temp was just north of 90 degrees. The difference may be that
> I have a plenum instead of the baffle seals. Once I reach 1000' I pull
> back the power to around 25" & 2500 rpm and lean to keep the same get as
> takeoff.
>
> Shannon
>
>
> On Monday, June 13, 2016, Kelly McMullen <apilot2@gmail.com
> <mailto:apilot2@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I don't suppose you were starting from ground temps of 85-90, much
> less departing with an engine that had already been hot soaked
> during a refuel stop. I expect this weekend I will be doing at
> least on takeoff with surface temps above 100.
>
> -sent from the microchip implanted in my forearm
>
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Shannon Hicks <civeng123@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','civeng123@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
> I have the stock louvers installed and have had absolutely no
> temperature issues on climb out. Friday I climbed straight
> to 11.5k at 120kts and none of my cylinders even came close to 400.
>
> Shannon
>
>
> On Monday, June 13, 2016, Kelly McMullen <apilot2@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','apilot2@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
> Thanks Ed. Very helpful. I guess that shows the stock
> louvers are not that effective. I was thinking of putting
> the cowl flaps outside the louvers. I will have to but a 3-D
> template to verify muffler clearance, but looked okay this
> morning, just eyeballing it.
>
>
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
The other thread talking about cowl flaps got me rethinking another kind of
cooling issue that I am having. I can't get my oil temps to climb above
140. It doesn't matter how hot it is outside or how long I climb, they top
out right at 140. Could this be caused by me having a plenum and having too
much air flow through the oil cooler? The probe registers ambient
temperature correctly when not running, so it seems to be accurate in that
regard. Can a faulty vernatherm cause this?
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Shannon
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Only my cylinder one goes slightly over 400 on climb out at full power
Alan
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 14, 2016, at 8:34 AM, Bill Watson <Mauledriver@nc.rr.com> wrote:
>
> Just as a data point, I did exactly that (90, heat soaked, climb to 9). I
did have one cylinder hit 400 but the rest stayed under 380 as they always d
o. Having problems with cylinder 1 which breaks 380 regularly climbing out d
uring our southern summers.
>
> But this is a stock '10 with a stock IO-540 pulling 2600rpms with a stock
2 bladed prop. I normally climb at 135 and start dialing back the speed to
125 by 9k.
>
> Bill "thinking the important number during the climb is reaching 70F" Wats
on
>
>> On 6/13/2016 9:02 PM, Kelly McMullen wrote:
>> I don't suppose you were starting from ground temps of 85-90, much less d
eparting with an engine that had already been hot soaked during a refuel sto
p. I expect this weekend I will be doing at least on takeoff with surface t
emps above 100.
>>
>> -sent from the microchip implanted in my forearm
>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Shannon Hicks <civeng123@gmail.com> wro
te:
>>> I have the stock louvers installed and have had absolutely no temperatur
e issues on climb out. Friday I climbed straight to 11.5k at 120kts and non
e of my cylinders even came close to 400.
>>>
>>> Shannon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Monday, June 13, 2016, Kelly McMullen <apilot2@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>> Thanks Ed. Very helpful. I guess that shows the stock louvers are not t
hat effective. I was thinking of putting the cowl flaps outside the louvers.
I will have to but a 3-D template to verify muffler clearance, but looked o
kay this morning, just eyeballing it.
>
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|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Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Run it into a pot of boiling water and see what it reads. First thing is to verify
the probe is working correctly.
Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation, Inc.
352-427-0285
jesse@saintaviation.com
Sent from my iPad
> On Jun 14, 2016, at 10:02 AM, Shannon Hicks <civeng123@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The other thread talking about cowl flaps got me rethinking another kind of cooling
issue that I am having. I can't get my oil temps to climb above 140. It
doesn't matter how hot it is outside or how long I climb, they top out right
at 140. Could this be caused by me having a plenum and having too much air flow
through the oil cooler? The probe registers ambient temperature correctly when
not running, so it seems to be accurate in that regard. Can a faulty vernatherm
cause this?
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> Shannon
Message 8
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Kelly,
I purchased my plenum from rvbits. Easy to install.
http://rvbits.mybigcommerce.com/products/RV10-CARBON-PLENUM-LID.html
Shannon
On Tuesday, June 14, 2016, Kelly McMullen <kellym@aviating.com> wrote:
>
> OK, that explains a lot. Did you fabricate the plenum or purchase it? If
> purchased, which vendor? I only have the stock baffle seals.
>
> On 6/14/2016 6:54 AM, Shannon Hicks wrote:
>
>> Kelly,
>> The ground temp was just north of 90 degrees. The difference may be that
>> I have a plenum instead of the baffle seals. Once I reach 1000' I pull
>> back the power to around 25" & 2500 rpm and lean to keep the same get as
>> takeoff.
>>
>> Shannon
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, June 13, 2016, Kelly McMullen <apilot2@gmail.com
>> <mailto:apilot2@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I don't suppose you were starting from ground temps of 85-90, much
>> less departing with an engine that had already been hot soaked
>> during a refuel stop. I expect this weekend I will be doing at
>> least on takeoff with surface temps above 100.
>>
>> -sent from the microchip implanted in my forearm
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Shannon Hicks <civeng123@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','civeng123@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>
>> I have the stock louvers installed and have had absolutely no
>> temperature issues on climb out. Friday I climbed straight
>> to 11.5k at 120kts and none of my cylinders even came close to
>> 400.
>>
>> Shannon
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, June 13, 2016, Kelly McMullen <apilot2@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','apilot2@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Ed. Very helpful. I guess that shows the stock
>> louvers are not that effective. I was thinking of putting
>> the cowl flaps outside the louvers. I will have to but a 3-D
>> template to verify muffler clearance, but looked okay this
>> morning, just eyeballing it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Message 9
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
In non-summer conditions I had the same problem - just couldn't get the
oil temp up to the minimum.
It seems that the combination of running less oil (6-7 quarts) and
blocking some of the airflow to the cooler with a plate installed in the
engine shroud fixed it. I don't recall ever changing the oil temp probe.
No change is required for NC/FL summers but I do reduce the size of the
blocking if I remember and run another quart of oil in summer.
Bill "found the stock setup to run very cool except for the tunnel" Watson
On 6/14/2016 10:02 AM, Shannon Hicks wrote:
> The other thread talking about cowl flaps got me rethinking another
> kind of cooling issue that I am having. I can't get my oil temps to
> climb above 140. It doesn't matter how hot it is outside or how long I
> climb, they top out right at 140. Could this be caused by me having a
> plenum and having too much air flow through the oil cooler? The probe
> registers ambient temperature correctly when not running, so it seems
> to be accurate in that regard. Can a faulty vernatherm cause this?
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> Shannon
Message 10
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I added another opening on each side to improve oil cooling. I also have
an additional oil cooler. Seems to be good enough now for Yuma's hot,
hot weather.
Albert Gardner
RV-10 N991RV
Yuma, AZ
Message 11
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Wet Dog Syndrome On Shutdown |
My first IO-540, so not sure if some of this is "normal", but the darn
thing shakes like a wet dog on shutdown.
I've modified my shutdown to use a higher RPM when pulling the mixture.
That helps a little, but still very noticeable.
I'm wondering if there's more to it and I need to check a few things.
Maybe need another washer on the isolator through bolts to tighten them
up a bit? Do I need the stiffer isolators? Maybe I need to re-check my
engine mount bolts, but I'd think that would be REALLY noticeable if
they were not to spec.
I did have to add a washer to the nose gear isolators to snug those up a
bit about 10 hours ago and I had custom VA-143 and VA-144 made to
correct size. That helped a little also, but I'm still
seeing/hearing/feeling a good deal of shake rattle and roll on shutdown.
Any other tips or guidance on things to check?
-Sean #40303 prepping for second annual. Need to get that shifted to
winter months. :(
Message 12
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Wet Dog Syndrome On Shutdown |
It just sounds like you are not getting the fuel to shut of completely and
it just keeps trying to run. =C2-God Bless America (please) =C2-:) Bruc
e
On Tuesday, June 14, 2016 2:00 PM, Sean Stephens <sean@stephensville.co
m> wrote:
My first IO-540, so not sure if some of this is "normal", but the darn
thing shakes like a wet dog on shutdown.
I've modified my shutdown to use a higher RPM when pulling the mixture.=C2
-
That helps a little, but still very noticeable.
I'm wondering if there's more to it and I need to check a few things.=C2-
Maybe need another washer on the isolator through bolts to tighten them
up a bit?=C2- Do I need the stiffer isolators?=C2- Maybe I need to re-c
heck my
engine mount bolts, but I'd think that would be REALLY noticeable if
they were not to spec.
I did have to add a washer to the nose gear isolators to snug those up a
bit about 10 hours ago and I had custom VA-143 and VA-144 made to
correct size.=C2- That helped a little also, but I'm still
seeing/hearing/feeling a good deal of shake rattle and roll on shutdown.
Any other tips or guidance on things to check?
-Sean #40303 prepping for second annual.=C2- Need to get that shifted to
winter months. :(
S -
WIKI -
-
=C2- =C2- =C2- =C2- =C2- -Matt Dralle, List Admin.
Message 13
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Wet Dog Syndrome On Shutdown |
Sean,
Are referring to excessive(?) physical shaking/vibration of the engine @
shutdown, or are you more concerned about the engine not shutting down
promptly and 'running on'?
Deems
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Sean Stephens <sean@stephensville.com>
wrote:
>
> My first IO-540, so not sure if some of this is "normal", but the darn
> thing shakes like a wet dog on shutdown.
>
> I've modified my shutdown to use a higher RPM when pulling the mixture.
> That helps a little, but still very noticeable.
>
> I'm wondering if there's more to it and I need to check a few things.
> Maybe need another washer on the isolator through bolts to tighten them up
> a bit? Do I need the stiffer isolators? Maybe I need to re-check my
> engine mount bolts, but I'd think that would be REALLY noticeable if they
> were not to spec.
>
> I did have to add a washer to the nose gear isolators to snug those up a
> bit about 10 hours ago and I had custom VA-143 and VA-144 made to correct
> size. That helped a little also, but I'm still seeing/hearing/feeling a
> good deal of shake rattle and roll on shutdown.
>
> Any other tips or guidance on things to check?
>
> -Sean #40303 prepping for second annual. Need to get that shifted to
> winter months. :(
>
>
Message 14
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Wet Dog Syndrome On Shutdown |
Hey Deems!
Yes, what I feel to be excessive shaking of the engine at shutdown. It
does not run on.
Been following the Lyc recommended shutdown at 1200 rpm then ICO.
Shaking like crazy with that procedure. I've read other shutdown
suggestions on the interwebs, but can't find anything that works, which
leads me to believe it's some kind of isolator issue or something.
-Sean
> Deems Davis <mailto:deemsdavis@cox.net>
> June 14, 2016 at 5:31 PM
> Sean,
>
> Are referring to excessive(?) physical shaking/vibration of the engine
> @ shutdown, or are you more concerned about the engine not shutting
> down promptly and 'running on'?
>
> Deems
>
>
Message 15
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Wet Dog Syndrome On Shutdown |
Try shutting it down by killing the mags and see if it is smoother. If you are
cutting the fuel off completely, it should be as smooth as killing the mags. They
all shake, but I've never thought of it as excessive.
Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation, Inc.
352-427-0285
jesse@saintaviation.com
Sent from my iPad
> On Jun 14, 2016, at 6:41 PM, Sean Stephens <sean@stephensville.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hey Deems!
>
> Yes, what I feel to be excessive shaking of the engine at shutdown. It does
not run on.
>
> Been following the Lyc recommended shutdown at 1200 rpm then ICO. Shaking like
crazy with that procedure. I've read other shutdown suggestions on the interwebs,
but can't find anything that works, which leads me to believe it's some
kind of isolator issue or something.
>
> -Sean
>
>> Deems Davis <mailto:deemsdavis@cox.net>
>> June 14, 2016 at 5:31 PM
>> Sean,
>>
>> Are referring to excessive(?) physical shaking/vibration of the engine @ shutdown,
or are you more concerned about the engine not shutting down promptly and
'running on'?
>>
>> Deems
>
>
>
>
Message 16
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Wet Dog Syndrome On Shutdown |
Thanks Jesse.
Do you mean instead of ICO, or at the same time as ICO?
> Jesse Saint <mailto:jesse@saintaviation.com>
> June 14, 2016 at 5:58 PM
>
> Try shutting it down by killing the mags and see if it is smoother. If
> you are cutting the fuel off completely, it should be as smooth as
> killing the mags. They all shake, but I've never thought of it as
> excessive.
>
> Jesse Saint
> Saint Aviation, Inc.
> 352-427-0285
> jesse@saintaviation.com
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>
Message 17
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Wet Dog Syndrome On Shutdown |
Instead of.
Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation, Inc.
352-427-0285
jesse@saintaviation.com
Sent from my iPad
> On Jun 14, 2016, at 7:19 PM, Sean Stephens <sean@stephensville.com> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks Jesse.
>
> Do you mean instead of ICO, or at the same time as ICO?
>
>> Jesse Saint <mailto:jesse@saintaviation.com>
>> June 14, 2016 at 5:58 PM
>>
>> Try shutting it down by killing the mags and see if it is smoother. If you are
cutting the fuel off completely, it should be as smooth as killing the mags.
They all shake, but I've never thought of it as excessive.
>>
>> Jesse Saint
>> Saint Aviation, Inc.
>> 352-427-0285
>> jesse@saintaviation.com
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
Message 18
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Wet Dog Syndrome On Shutdown |
I assume what that would tell me is if I have the mixture properly set
on the servo to REALLY be at idle cutoff?
> Jesse Saint <mailto:jesse@saintaviation.com>
> June 14, 2016 at 7:05 PM
>
> Instead of.
>
> Jesse Saint
> Saint Aviation, Inc.
> 352-427-0285
> jesse@saintaviation.com
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>
Message 19
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Wet Dog Syndrome On Shutdown |
It's my understanding that most fuel injection systems have a spring-loaded
valve at the distribution manifold to allow for clean, quick shutdowns once
the fuel pressure drops below a certain threshold. Seems like if this were
failing to close cleanly some of the cylinders might run longer than
others, thus causing a shudder... Shutting down the ignition would
eliminate that as a cause.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Sean Stephens <sean@stephensville.com>
wrote:
>
>
> I assume what that would tell me is if I have the mixture properly set on
> the servo to REALLY be at idle cutoff?
>
>> Jesse Saint <mailto:jesse@saintaviation.com>
>> June 14, 2016 at 7:05 PM
>>
>> Instead of.
>>
>> Jesse Saint
>> Saint Aviation, Inc.
>> 352-427-0285
>> jesse@saintaviation.com
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Message 20
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Wet Dog Syndrome On Shutdown |
or the mixture cable isn't extending enough to fully close the fuel flow.it
does sound like the aircraft is at a 400rpm mode and struggling to stay ru
nning with minimal fuel flow.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Tab=C2=AE S
-------- Original message --------
From: "Berck E. Nash" <flyboy@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RV10-List: Wet Dog Syndrome On Shutdown
It's my understanding that most fuel injection systems have a spring-loaded
valve at the distribution manifold to allow for clean=2C quick shutdowns on
ce
the fuel pressure drops below a certain threshold. Seems like if this were
failing to close cleanly some of the cylinders might run longer than
others=2C thus causing a shudder... Shutting down the ignition would
eliminate that as a cause.
On Tue=2C Jun 14=2C 2016 at 7:45 PM=2C Sean Stephens <sean@stephensville.co
m>
wrote:
>
>
> I assume what that would tell me is if I have the mixture properly set on
> the servo to REALLY be at idle cutoff?
>
>> Jesse Saint <mailto:jesse@saintaviation.com>
>> June 14=2C 2016 at 7:05 PM
>>
>> Instead of.
>>
>> Jesse Saint
>> Saint Aviation=2C Inc.
>> 352-427-0285
>> jesse@saintaviation.com
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Message 21
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Wet Dog Syndrome On Shutdown |
Pull the throttle back to idle. Should be at or less than 1000 rpm. Then go
to ICO. Should shutdown quickly and smoothly, assuming it idles smoothly.
-sent from the microchip implanted in my forearm
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Sean Stephens <sean@stephensville.com>
wrote:
>
> Hey Deems!
>
> Yes, what I feel to be excessive shaking of the engine at shutdown. It
> does not run on.
>
> Been following the Lyc recommended shutdown at 1200 rpm then ICO. Shaking
> like crazy with that procedure. I've read other shutdown suggestions on
> the interwebs, but can't find anything that works, which leads me to
> believe it's some kind of isolator issue or something.
>
> -Sean
>
> Deems Davis <mailto:deemsdavis@cox.net>
>> June 14, 2016 at 5:31 PM
>> Sean,
>>
>> Are referring to excessive(?) physical shaking/vibration of the engine @
>> shutdown, or are you more concerned about the engine not shutting down
>> promptly and 'running on'?
>>
>> Deems
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Message 22
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Wet Dog Syndrome On Shutdown |
Your mixture should give a 50 rpm rise if you pull mixture slowly to
cutoff. If more, too rich. If less, too lean.
Shouldn't make any difference where it is set, you should still get
cutoff when mixture is pulled to the stop.
On 6/14/2016 6:45 PM, Sean Stephens wrote:
>
>
> I assume what that would tell me is if I have the mixture properly set
> on the servo to REALLY be at idle cutoff?
>> Jesse Saint <mailto:jesse@saintaviation.com>
>> June 14, 2016 at 7:05 PM
>>
>> Instead of.
>>
>> Jesse Saint
>> Saint Aviation, Inc.
>> 352-427-0285
>> jesse@saintaviation.com
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Message 23
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Wet Dog Syndrome On Shutdown |
Sorry, but I am confused.
The engine does stop, obviously, just not without doin' the shake. Are
you saying it may be set too rich, causing it to still fire during shutdown?
> Kelly McMullen <mailto:kellym@aviating.com>
> June 14, 2016 at 10:09 PM
>
> Your mixture should give a 50 rpm rise if you pull mixture slowly to
> cutoff. If more, too rich. If less, too lean.
> Shouldn't make any difference where it is set, you should still get
> cutoff when mixture is pulled to the stop.
>
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|