---------------------------------------------------------- RV10-List Digest Archive --- Total Messages Posted Tue 09/20/16: 5 ---------------------------------------------------------- Today's Message Index: ---------------------- 1. 04:20 AM - Re: PCU 5000 able to command low rpm (<1700rpm)? (Bill Watson) 2. 05:15 AM - Re: Lycoming Engine School (was PCU 5000 able to command low rpm) (Carlos Trigo) 3. 05:54 AM - Re: Lycoming Engine School (Carlos Trigo) 4. 07:10 AM - Re: Lycoming Engine School (was PCU 5000 able to command low rpm) (Bill Watson) 5. 07:38 AM - Re: Lycoming Engine School (Carlos Trigo) ________________________________ Message 1 _____________________________________ Time: 04:20:17 AM PST US Subject: Re: RV10-List: PCU 5000 able to command low rpm (<1700rpm)? From: Bill Watson On a similar note, I avoid running at or below 1000 rpm to avoid lead fouling, which I am led to believe can happen even when fully leaned. While attending Lycoming Engine School, I followed up with the instructor after his lead fouling discussion and came away with the understanding that lead build-up will occur anytime combustion chamber temperatures drop below a certain point. He emphasized that it happens very quickly based on some testing he was familiar with. He mentioned that that the practice of pulling the power off at touchdown and leaving it there during the rollout is enough to form visible deposits. By the same token, heating things up above the critical temperature soon after will cause most, but not all of those new deposits to quickly evaporate away. This write-up from Shell seems to support that thinking. As a result of the same thinking, I've never practiced engine out descents with the power pulled all the way and the prop slowed anywhere near 1000 rpm. This former fixed pitch jockey handles the prop cycling task by setting the power around 1500 rpms before cycling the prop. During the cycle, the rpm drop just hits 1000 rpms as I move the control forward. And I try to not to imitate what I've seen some CFIs do by slamming the prop control this way and that. On my engine a slower steady hand will do. I've never been told that it's hard on the prop and don't believe it is. I have been told that I'm both checking function and forcing some warm oil thru the controller so that it performs as expected during takeoff. Now I'm thinking the main task is just to make sure it works without spraying oil all over the place but honestly just don't really know. I just do it. Bill "glider guider at heart that has learned to love that big 'ol 540" Watson N215TG On 9/19/2016 10:26 PM, Carl Froehlich wrote: > I don't recall how far it will pull down the RPM - I only pull the prop > until a get a slight drop to make sure the governor is functioning. I was > told (correctly or incorrectly) deep run up cycles are hard on props. > > > Thanks, Carl. > > I want to make sure I understand your reply correctly. I do my runups at > 1800. If I pull the prop control back during runup, the MT governor/prop > will slow the engine way down -- probably below 1000 rpm. > Certainly well below 1700 rpm. Are you telling me that with the PCU > 5000, if pull the prop control all the way back (at runup, for example), > your experience is the PCU5000 won't slow the engine below 1700 rpm? > > Thanks very much for your insights. I appreciate it. > > Tim Lewis --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus ________________________________ Message 2 _____________________________________ Time: 05:15:04 AM PST US From: "Carlos Trigo" Subject: RE: RV10-List: Lycoming Engine School (was PCU 5000 able to command low rpm) Bill You mentioned "Lycoming engine School", does that still exist? Regards Carlos "wishing to learn all about Lycoming engines" Trigo De: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] Em nome de Bill Watson Enviada: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 12:19 PM Para: rv10-list@matronics.com Assunto: Re: RV10-List: PCU 5000 able to command low rpm (<1700rpm)? On a similar note, I avoid running at or below 1000 rpm to avoid lead fouling, which I am led to believe can happen even when fully leaned. While attending Lycoming Engine School, I followed up with the instructor after his lead fouling discussion and came away with the understanding that lead build-up will occur anytime combustion chamber temperatures drop below a certain point. He emphasized that it happens very quickly based on some testing he was familiar with. He mentioned that that the practice of pulling the power off at touchdown and leaving it there during the rollout is enough to form visible deposits. By the same token, heating things up above the critical temperature soon after will cause most, but not all of those new deposits to quickly evaporate away. This write-up from Shell seems to support that thinking. As a result of the same thinking, I've never practiced engine out descents with the power pulled all the way and the prop slowed anywhere near 1000 rpm. This former fixed pitch jockey handles the prop cycling task by setting the power around 1500 rpms before cycling the prop. During the cycle, the rpm drop just hits 1000 rpms as I move the control forward. And I try to not to imitate what I've seen some CFIs do by slamming the prop control this way and that. On my engine a slower steady hand will do. I've never been told that it's hard on the prop and don't believe it is. I have been told that I'm both checking function and forcing some warm oil thru the controller so that it performs as expected during takeoff. Now I'm thinking the main task is just to make sure it works without spraying oil all over the place but honestly just don't really know. I just do it. Bill "glider guider at heart that has learned to love that big 'ol 540" Watson N215TG On 9/19/2016 10:26 PM, Carl Froehlich wrote: I don't recall how far it will pull down the RPM - I only pull the prop until a get a slight drop to make sure the governor is functioning. I was told (correctly or incorrectly) deep run up cycles are hard on props. Thanks, Carl. I want to make sure I understand your reply correctly. I do my runups at 1800. If I pull the prop control back during runup, the MT governor/prop will slow the engine way down -- probably below 1000 rpm. Certainly well below 1700 rpm. Are you telling me that with the PCU 5000, if pull the prop control all the way back (at runup, for example), your experience is the PCU5000 won't slow the engine below 1700 rpm? Thanks very much for your insights. I appreciate it. Tim Lewis _____ This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com ________________________________ Message 3 _____________________________________ Time: 05:54:53 AM PST US From: "Carlos Trigo" Subject: RE: RV10-List: Lycoming Engine School Trying to answer my own question, are these the courses I found in the "Pennsylvannia College of Technology"? CT De: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] Em nome de Carlos Trigo Enviada: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 1:14 PM Para: rv10-list@matronics.com Assunto: RE: RV10-List: Lycoming Engine School (was PCU 5000 able to command low rpm) Bill You mentioned "Lycoming engine School", does that still exist? Regards Carlos "wishing to learn all about Lycoming engines" Trigo De: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [ mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] Em nome de Bill Watson Enviada: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 12:19 PM Para: rv10-list@matronics.com Assunto: Re: RV10-List: PCU 5000 able to command low rpm (<1700rpm)? On a similar note, I avoid running at or below 1000 rpm to avoid lead fouling, which I am led to believe can happen even when fully leaned. While attending Lycoming Engine School, I followed up with the instructor after his lead fouling discussion and came away with the understanding that lead build-up will occur anytime combustion chamber temperatures drop below a certain point. He emphasized that it happens very quickly based on some testing he was familiar with. He mentioned that that the practice of pulling the power off at touchdown and leaving it there during the rollout is enough to form visible deposits. By the same token, heating things up above the critical temperature soon after will cause most, but not all of those new deposits to quickly evaporate away. This write-up from Shell seems to support that thinking. As a result of the same thinking, I've never practiced engine out descents with the power pulled all the way and the prop slowed anywhere near 1000 rpm. This former fixed pitch jockey handles the prop cycling task by setting the power around 1500 rpms before cycling the prop. During the cycle, the rpm drop just hits 1000 rpms as I move the control forward. And I try to not to imitate what I've seen some CFIs do by slamming the prop control this way and that. On my engine a slower steady hand will do. I've never been told that it's hard on the prop and don't believe it is. I have been told that I'm both checking function and forcing some warm oil thru the controller so that it performs as expected during takeoff. Now I'm thinking the main task is just to make sure it works without spraying oil all over the place but honestly just don't really know. I just do it. Bill "glider guider at heart that has learned to love that big 'ol 540" Watson N215TG On 9/19/2016 10:26 PM, Carl Froehlich wrote: I don't recall how far it will pull down the RPM - I only pull the prop until a get a slight drop to make sure the governor is functioning. I was told (correctly or incorrectly) deep run up cycles are hard on props. Thanks, Carl. I want to make sure I understand your reply correctly. I do my runups at 1800. If I pull the prop control back during runup, the MT governor/prop will slow the engine way down -- probably below 1000 rpm. Certainly well below 1700 rpm. Are you telling me that with the PCU 5000, if pull the prop control all the way back (at runup, for example), your experience is the PCU5000 won't slow the engine below 1700 rpm? Thanks very much for your insights. I appreciate it. Tim Lewis _____ This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com ________________________________ Message 4 _____________________________________ Time: 07:10:22 AM PST US Subject: Re: RV10-List: Lycoming Engine School (was PCU 5000 able to command low rpm) From: Bill Watson Yes, I think so, but with a big but.... I recently got a mailing from Lycoming that indicated the long time instructor of the 2 'engine school' classes was going to retire after his last class. I attended the school back in 2013 and I'm not sure when his last class is scheduled (sometime in 2016 I believe). I forget the gentleman's name but he has been synonymous with the 'engine school' classes for a long time. He is a great instructor with a long and varied career at Lycoming that makes him a unique resource. I'd highly recommend the school with him instructing. I'd want a review of the 'new' classes before attending them without him. In some previous life I spent some time teaching and was steeped in pedagogical practice which makes me an instant critic of any educational event. This guy initially struck me as a knowledgeable old timer who was going to share war stories for 8 days; inject me with caffiene, stat! It took me a half day to realize he was a very experienced instructor who had the course content fully integrated into a folksy delivery style complete with hands on lab work and exactly the documentation and notes one needed to go home with. Barely a wasted word or motion. And he was deep in specific Lycoming operation and service details. Looking back at my confirmation letter from 2013, the classes were part of Penn College ($1,425 for both together). The first was called 'Service School' and one walked out with manuals, service documents, and the ability to use them to service Lycoming engines. That is prerequisite to the 2nd class 'Dissembly/Reassembly' which is a guided lab where you do the deed. I highly recommend the classes for any builder unless you already have a certificate, independent of how much service you intend to inflict on your IO-540. I envision that after he leaves, the classes will retain the same format, structure and value. The quality of instruction is the only question. Bill On 9/20/2016 8:14 AM, Carlos Trigo wrote: > > Bill > > You mentioned Lycoming engine School, does that still exist? > > Regards > > Carlos wishing to learn all about Lycoming engines Trigo > > *De:*owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] *Em nome de *Bill Watson > *Enviada:* Tuesday, September 20, 2016 12:19 PM > *Para:* rv10-list@matronics.com > *Assunto:* Re: RV10-List: PCU 5000 able to command low rpm (<1700rpm)? > > On a similar note, I avoid running at or below 1000 rpm to avoid lead > fouling, which I am led to believe can happen even when fully leaned. > > While attending Lycoming Engine School, I followed up with the > instructor after his lead fouling discussion and came away with the > understanding that lead build-up will occur anytime combustion chamber > temperatures drop below a certain point. He emphasized that it > happens very quickly based on some testing he was familiar with. He > mentioned that that the practice of pulling the power off at touchdown > and leaving it there during the rollout is enough to form visible > deposits. By the same token, heating things up above the critical > temperature soon after will cause most, but not all of those new > deposits to quickly evaporate away. > > This write-up from Shell > > seems to support that thinking. > > As a result of the same thinking, I've never practiced engine out > descents with the power pulled all the way and the prop slowed > anywhere near 1000 rpm. > > This former fixed pitch jockey handles the prop cycling task by > setting the power around 1500 rpms before cycling the prop. During > the cycle, the rpm drop just hits 1000 rpms as I move the control > forward. And I try to not to imitate what I've seen some CFIs do by > slamming the prop control this way and that. On my engine a slower > steady hand will do. > > I've never been told that it's hard on the prop and don't believe it > is. I have been told that I'm both checking function and forcing some > warm oil thru the controller so that it performs as expected during > takeoff. Now I'm thinking the main task is just to make sure it works > without spraying oil all over the place but honestly just don't really > know. I just do it. > > Bill "glider guider at heart that has learned to love that big 'ol > 540" Watson > N215TG > > On 9/19/2016 10:26 PM, Carl Froehlich wrote: > > I don't recall how far it will pull down the RPM - I only pull the prop > > until a get a slight drop to make sure the governor is functioning. I was > > told (correctly or incorrectly) deep run up cycles are hard on props. > > > Thanks, Carl. > > I want to make sure I understand your reply correctly. I do my runups at > > 1800. If I pull the prop control back during runup, the MT governor/prop > > will slow the engine way down -- probably below 1000 rpm. > > Certainly well below 1700 rpm. Are you telling me that with the PCU > > 5000, if pull the prop control all the way back (at runup, for example), > > your experience is the PCU5000 won't slow the engine below 1700 rpm? > > Thanks very much for your insights. I appreciate it. > > Tim Lewis > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Imagem removida pelo remetente. Avast logo > > > > > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > www.avast.com > > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus /9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAQEAYABgAAD/2wBDAAgGBgcGBQgHBwcJCQgKDBQNDAsLDBkSEw8UHRof Hh0aHBwgJC4nICIsIxwcKDcpLDAxNDQ0Hyc5PTgyPC4zNDL/2wBDAQkJCQwLDBgNDRgyIRwh MjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjL/wAAR CABkAGQDASIAAhEBAxEB/8QAHwAAAQUBAQEBAQEAAAAAAAAAAAECAwQFBgcICQoL/8QAtRAA AgEDAwIEAwUFBAQAAAF9AQIDAAQRBRIhMUEGE1FhByJxFDKBkaEII0KxwRVS0fAkM2JyggkK FhcYGRolJicoKSo0NTY3ODk6Q0RFRkdISUpTVFVWV1hZWmNkZWZnaGlqc3R1dnd4eXqDhIWG h4iJipKTlJWWl5iZmqKjpKWmp6ipqrKztLW2t7i5usLDxMXGx8jJytLT1NXW19jZ2uHi4+Tl 5ufo6erx8vP09fb3+Pn6/8QAHwEAAwEBAQEBAQEBAQAAAAAAAAECAwQFBgcICQoL/8QAtREA AgECBAQDBAcFBAQAAQJ3AAECAxEEBSExBhJBUQdhcRMiMoEIFEKRobHBCSMzUvAVYnLRChYk NOEl8RcYGRomJygpKjU2Nzg5OkNERUZHSElKU1RVVldYWVpjZGVmZ2hpanN0dXZ3eHl6goOE hYaHiImKkpOUlZaXmJmaoqOkpaanqKmqsrO0tba3uLm6wsPExcbHyMnK0tPU1dbX2Nna4uPk 5ebn6Onq8vP09fb3+Pn6/9oADAMBAAIRAxEAPwD3+iiigAooooAKKKKACiiigAooooAKKKKA CiiigAooooAKKKKACiiigAooooAKKKKACiiigAooooAKKKKACiiigAooooAKKKKACiiigAoo ooAKKKKACiiigAooooAKKKKACiiigAooooAKKKKACiiigAooooAKKKKACiiigAooooAKKKKA CiiigAooooAKKKKACiiigAooooAKKKKACiiigAooooAKKKKACiiigAooooAKKKKACiiigAoo ooAKKKKACiiigD//2Q= ________________________________ Message 5 _____________________________________ Time: 07:38:16 AM PST US From: "Carlos Trigo" Subject: RE: RV10-List: Lycoming Engine School The instructor who appears in the website information is Mr. Michael Damiani, being it in the 2016 or the 2017 courses. Carlos De: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] Em nome de Bill Watson Enviada: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 3:10 PM Para: rv10-list@matronics.com Assunto: Re: RV10-List: Lycoming Engine School (was PCU 5000 able to command low rpm) Yes, I think so, but with a big but.... I recently got a mailing from Lycoming that indicated the long time instructor of the 2 'engine school' classes was going to retire after his last class. I attended the school back in 2013 and I'm not sure when his last class is scheduled (sometime in 2016 I believe). I forget the gentleman's name but he has been synonymous with the 'engine school' classes for a long time. He is a great instructor with a long and varied career at Lycoming that makes him a unique resource. I'd highly recommend the school with him instructing. I'd want a review of the 'new' classes before attending them without him. In some previous life I spent some time teaching and was steeped in pedagogical practice which makes me an instant critic of any educational event. This guy initially struck me as a knowledgeable old timer who was going to share war stories for 8 days; inject me with caffiene, stat! It took me a half day to realize he was a very experienced instructor who had the course content fully integrated into a folksy delivery style complete with hands on lab work and exactly the documentation and notes one needed to go home with. Barely a wasted word or motion. And he was deep in specific Lycoming operation and service details. Looking back at my confirmation letter from 2013, the classes were part of Penn College ($1,425 for both together). The first was called 'Service School' and one walked out with manuals, service documents, and the ability to use them to service Lycoming engines. That is prerequisite to the 2nd class 'Dissembly/Reassembly' which is a guided lab where you do the deed. I highly recommend the classes for any builder unless you already have a certificate, independent of how much service you intend to inflict on your IO-540. I envision that after he leaves, the classes will retain the same format, structure and value. The quality of instruction is the only question. Bill On 9/20/2016 8:14 AM, Carlos Trigo wrote: Bill You mentioned "Lycoming engine School", does that still exist? Regards Carlos "wishing to learn all about Lycoming engines" Trigo De: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] Em nome de Bill Watson Enviada: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 12:19 PM Para: rv10-list@matronics.com Assunto: Re: RV10-List: PCU 5000 able to command low rpm (<1700rpm)? On a similar note, I avoid running at or below 1000 rpm to avoid lead fouling, which I am led to believe can happen even when fully leaned. While attending Lycoming Engine School, I followed up with the instructor after his lead fouling discussion and came away with the understanding that lead build-up will occur anytime combustion chamber temperatures drop below a certain point. He emphasized that it happens very quickly based on some testing he was familiar with. He mentioned that that the practice of pulling the power off at touchdown and leaving it there during the rollout is enough to form visible deposits. By the same token, heating things up above the critical temperature soon after will cause most, but not all of those new deposits to quickly evaporate away. This write-up from Shell seems to support that thinking. As a result of the same thinking, I've never practiced engine out descents with the power pulled all the way and the prop slowed anywhere near 1000 rpm. This former fixed pitch jockey handles the prop cycling task by setting the power around 1500 rpms before cycling the prop. During the cycle, the rpm drop just hits 1000 rpms as I move the control forward. And I try to not to imitate what I've seen some CFIs do by slamming the prop control this way and that. On my engine a slower steady hand will do. I've never been told that it's hard on the prop and don't believe it is. I have been told that I'm both checking function and forcing some warm oil thru the controller so that it performs as expected during takeoff. Now I'm thinking the main task is just to make sure it works without spraying oil all over the place but honestly just don't really know. I just do it. Bill "glider guider at heart that has learned to love that big 'ol 540" Watson N215TG On 9/19/2016 10:26 PM, Carl Froehlich wrote: I don't recall how far it will pull down the RPM - I only pull the prop until a get a slight drop to make sure the governor is functioning. I was told (correctly or incorrectly) deep run up cycles are hard on props. Thanks, Carl. I want to make sure I understand your reply correctly. I do my runups at 1800. If I pull the prop control back during runup, the MT governor/prop will slow the engine way down -- probably below 1000 rpm. Certainly well below 1700 rpm. Are you telling me that with the PCU 5000, if pull the prop control all the way back (at runup, for example), your experience is the PCU5000 won't slow the engine below 1700 rpm? Thanks very much for your insights. I appreciate it. Tim Lewis _____ This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com _____ This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other Matronics Email List Services ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post A New Message rv10-list@matronics.com UN/SUBSCRIBE http://www.matronics.com/subscription List FAQ http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV10-List.htm Web Forum Interface To Lists http://forums.matronics.com Matronics List Wiki http://wiki.matronics.com Full Archive Search Engine http://www.matronics.com/search 7-Day List Browse http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv10-list Browse Digests http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list Browse Other Lists http://www.matronics.com/browse Live Online Chat! http://www.matronics.com/chat Archive Downloading http://www.matronics.com/archives Photo Share http://www.matronics.com/photoshare Other Email Lists http://www.matronics.com/emaillists Contributions http://www.matronics.com/contribution ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.