Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 07:04 AM - Re: PCU5000 Prop Gov recall (johngoodman)
2. 07:51 AM - Re: Re: PCU5000 Prop Gov recall (Kelly McMullen)
3. 09:04 AM - PCU500/x Service Letter (kearney)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: PCU5000 Prop Gov recall |
The way I read it, it's just for overhaul shops working on PCU5000s, if they get
one. It's not a recall.
John
--------
#40572 Phase One complete in 2011
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=461633#461633
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: PCU5000 Prop Gov recall |
MT governors were not a recall either, just a service bulletin with some
misleading information as to what governors needed upgrade.
BTW my MT governor is noticeably more responsive and a little more
sensitive since the upgrade, as the new flyweights are a little heavier.
Kelly
-sent from the I-droid implanted in my forearm
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 7:03 AM, johngoodman <johngoodman@earthlink.net>
wrote:
>
> The way I read it, it's just for overhaul shops working on PCU5000s, if
> they get one. It's not a recall.
>
> John
>
> --------
> #40572 Phase One complete in 2011
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=461633#461633
>
>
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | PCU500/x Service Letter |
Hi
I just spoke to Aerotechnical about this service letter. Here are the facts as
given to me:
1. The MT prop flyweights and PCU500O flyweights are made by different manufacturers
2. This service letter has been in the works for a year - it is not the result
of technical issues
3. The service letter is a result of the company standardizing parts between their
turbine and reciprocating engine design / parts.
4. This does not affect the PCU overhaul requirements (7 years TIS or TBO whichever
occurs first).
I suggested that they post a note on VAF as peiople seem to be inferring that this
letter is related to the MT recall (which it is not).
In short, nothing to see here....
Cheers
Les
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=461641#461641
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|