---------------------------------------------------------- RV10-List Digest Archive --- Total Messages Posted Wed 10/26/16: 3 ---------------------------------------------------------- Today's Message Index: ---------------------- 1. 07:04 AM - Re: PCU5000 Prop Gov recall (johngoodman) 2. 07:51 AM - Re: Re: PCU5000 Prop Gov recall (Kelly McMullen) 3. 09:04 AM - PCU500/x Service Letter (kearney) ________________________________ Message 1 _____________________________________ Time: 07:04:29 AM PST US Subject: RV10-List: Re: PCU5000 Prop Gov recall From: "johngoodman" The way I read it, it's just for overhaul shops working on PCU5000s, if they get one. It's not a recall. John -------- #40572 Phase One complete in 2011 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=461633#461633 ________________________________ Message 2 _____________________________________ Time: 07:51:57 AM PST US From: Kelly McMullen Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: PCU5000 Prop Gov recall MT governors were not a recall either, just a service bulletin with some misleading information as to what governors needed upgrade. BTW my MT governor is noticeably more responsive and a little more sensitive since the upgrade, as the new flyweights are a little heavier. Kelly -sent from the I-droid implanted in my forearm On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 7:03 AM, johngoodman wrote: > > The way I read it, it's just for overhaul shops working on PCU5000s, if > they get one. It's not a recall. > > John > > -------- > #40572 Phase One complete in 2011 > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=461633#461633 > > ________________________________ Message 3 _____________________________________ Time: 09:04:27 AM PST US Subject: RV10-List: PCU500/x Service Letter From: "kearney" Hi I just spoke to Aerotechnical about this service letter. Here are the facts as given to me: 1. The MT prop flyweights and PCU500O flyweights are made by different manufacturers 2. This service letter has been in the works for a year - it is not the result of technical issues 3. The service letter is a result of the company standardizing parts between their turbine and reciprocating engine design / parts. 4. This does not affect the PCU overhaul requirements (7 years TIS or TBO whichever occurs first). I suggested that they post a note on VAF as peiople seem to be inferring that this letter is related to the MT recall (which it is not). In short, nothing to see here.... Cheers Les Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=461641#461641 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other Matronics Email List Services ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post A New Message rv10-list@matronics.com UN/SUBSCRIBE http://www.matronics.com/subscription List FAQ http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV10-List.htm Web Forum Interface To Lists http://forums.matronics.com Matronics List Wiki http://wiki.matronics.com Full Archive Search Engine http://www.matronics.com/search 7-Day List Browse http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv10-list Browse Digests http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list Browse Other Lists http://www.matronics.com/browse Live Online Chat! http://www.matronics.com/chat Archive Downloading http://www.matronics.com/archives Photo Share http://www.matronics.com/photoshare Other Email Lists http://www.matronics.com/emaillists Contributions http://www.matronics.com/contribution ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.